My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.

Monday, August 1, 2022

The Real Questions at Hand, with Addendum

The company for which my husband works is hosting a myriad of military and DoD visitors this week and next.  There are purported to be military contractors among this group as well.

Given that my stalker, an FBI affiliate, has been referencing these events, I feel genuinely alarmed at the prospect of these individuals adding yet further grist to the FBI's falsified reporting mill.

I have no control over these events.

I cannot alter them.

But what I can do is notify the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. DOJ that I have been warned the FBI has asked these men to add further to lies about my husband, who is in all ways an honorable man.

It's difficult to know how best to address the Stasi-style predicament into which the FBI has placed our nation.

What can one say when one's hair dresser, Klara Turner, has been conscripted as an FBI informant?

How can one respond to the knowledge that one's gardener is being threatened by repercussions to his family members' immigration applications if he fails to comply with FBI demands for false reporting?

How can a person answer the assertion that employees and clients of one's fitness club, Equinox, have perjured themselves for pay?

I realize that I stand as a whistleblower regarding corruption of programs that are worth billions of dollars in congressional budget appropriations every year.  How much exactly -- it's hard to say.

The Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative is worth perhaps two billion.  But affiliated programs connected to the FBI's "target of interest" program are worth much more.

The Air Force and the Navy appear to jointly administer HAARP to harass "targets" (aka law-abiding, contributing Democrats and journalists).

And Air Force Intelligence appears to be closely involved in running its "non-investigative subjects" program (in which law-abiding participants are entirely unwilling and unconsenting).

The NSA is devoting vast resources from the National Treasury to track all electronic and phone communications.

And now, with the broad dissemination of Pegasus software, FBI affiliates appear to be recording Americans' private lives without their knowledge or permission.

And many men and women within the FBI appear to be creating false accusations about law-abiding American citizens out of whole cloth.  This takes time, effort, threats extended by FBI handlers, and considerable bribes from Infragard.

Then there are all the ancillary companies engaged in the manufacture of the surveillance gadgetry and apparatus that keep this particular engine humming.

I would guesstimate the entire enterprise of surveillance and harassment to be drawing between 20 billion and 50 billion dollars in yearly expenditures.

If I'm right about this, the real questions at hand are the following:

Could Air Force, DoD, and military contractor personnel be persuaded to lie about a virtuous man at the instruction of the FBI, knowing that between 20 billion and 50 billion dollars were on the line for their associates annually?

Would those lies comport with falsehoods the FBI had already attempted to assert regarding unlawful technology transfer to a foreign entity of some kind, as my stalker has alleged?  In other words, would the FBI be seeking to bolster its lies surrounding "industrial espionage"?

And what would the FBI's goals be?  The threat of unjustified arrest so that I, as an FBI whistleblower, could be controlled?  

Further threats of physical harm toward my family members, so that I, as an FBI whistleblower, could be silenced?

The delay of the fulfillment of my FOIA request from the ODNI?  The delay of the fulfillment of my husband's FOIA request from the ODNI?

OIG Hotline, my sense is that it would be helpful for those who support democracy to take a very assertive stance with regard to the Air Force, DoD, and military contractor visitors who will soon be gathering at my husband's workplace.

There are many aligned interests located within the "military-industrial complex," as Eisenhower referred to it, all of whom would like to see national treasury allocations for the "authoritarian enterprise" increase -- not decrease.

I sense that my husband is in danger of being falsely testified against by some powerful entities, and I think we need your help.


Addendum:  OIG Hotline, my stalker has conveyed that there is an intention to cause physical harm to my husband in some manner.  These visitors are here for Monday and Tuesday this week, and Tuesday plus one other day next week, I believe.  

I am aware that they plan to caravan to lunch and dinner locations.  

It is not clear to me whether my stalker is referencing a staged car accident during such a caravan, when my husband's vehicle would be surrounded front and back by vehicles driven by military men and military contractors.  Certainly, my stalker has threatened a staged vehicle accident concerning my husband many, many times.

I am not aware of alternate plans of harming my husband, but I need to state that my alarm is raised.  Over the last several days, my stalker repeatedly stated an intention to render me a widow.  Perhaps false witness statements from this group are intended to justify physical violence toward my family perpetrated by law enforcement.

I believe we need protective intervention on an urgent basis.

Beyond this, I need to state my belief at this time that the delay in fulfilling our Freedom of Information Act requests is placing our lives at risk.

My family is comprised of loyal, law-abiding Americans of high character and integrity  We are civilians, I must point out.  We have no special training that would allow us to survive predation at this level.  We have no security detail.  We have never been on a battlefront.

We have courage, faith, hope, and a desire to illuminate the truth through our Freedom of Information Act requests.

Given the imbalance of powers present in this circumstance, I must ask:  are these personal gifts sufficient to this challenge?

No comments:

Post a Comment