Respect Where Respect Is Due

 OIG Hotline, at 7:23 PM Pacific time, I sent your Office an email with the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Attestation of Confidence by KPM.

The content of the text exchange between my husband and myself regarding this subject is as follows:

LM to KPM:  Kxx, I'm pleased that you have confirmed my right to my perspective regarding Dxxxxx's circumstances, which are by no means his own fault.  Your confirmation of my powers of reasoning, my cogency, my stability and my impressive resilience in the face of adversity is important from many points of view, and not least as a measure of your enduring respect for my judgment and my insight.  Thank you for your confidence in me as your wife, as an insightful mother to our children, and as a person of great substance and courage in the wider world.

KPM to LM:  You have my respect and my love Darling Person.  You have been a supportive, fiercely loving parent to our children, and a person of reason and insight.

LM to KPM:  Thank you for your confidence in me, Kxx.  I appreciate your truthful support, and your trust in my ability and my judgment.

Please let there be no more questions about my psychological stability and resilience.  It may be a miracle that I am as profoundly resolute and determined to support the sovereignty of our nation and our citizens as I am.  But that stalwart commitment is not a delusion, a psychosis, a myth or a dream.  It is a necessity on which every worthy leader's hopes for our country rely.  

I ask that there be no further attempts to say that those Americans of great fortitude and commitment to our nation have lost their minds.  This type of defamation is an insult to Americans' joint endeavor to build and rebuild a community of trust, talent, truthfulness and hope for the future.  

And we do not need to rely on the FBI's misogynistic tropes that lean toward accusations of histrionics, mental instability, and promiscuity toward every talented woman who comes into view.  This is outdated bias that is mostly shocking for its primitive regression to a time when women were not uncommonly institutionalized if they possessed a valuable inheritance and insufficiently loyal male relatives.

I happen to have only had one intimate partner over my lifetime as of this writing, that of my honorable husband of the last thirty five years.  But if I had had two or ten, I believe my character and integrity would be the same.

Let's insist on better conduct from the FBI and its affiliates with regard to its knowingly false accusations about highly honorable women, and let's do so right away, please.

Thank you for allowing me to express these serious concerns.

Lane MacWilliams

Rebutting Further False Allegations Directed By Wayward FBI Personnel

 1.  It seems that your older son is being threatened with death by his handlers unless he falsely alleges that you are mentally ill or unstable, and thus unqualified to receive awards extended in your name through the U.S. DoJ and its affiliates.  Is this your impression?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  My older son is allegedly being asked to sign false witness statements that dovetail with false witness statements from my younger son, and I'm sure that both sets of falsehoods are being thoroughly vetted by Txx Lxxxx, whose career within the FBI is now on the line due to his lies about me in the past.

2.  Aren't you currently serving as Durable Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney for your older son?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

3.  So, isn't it the case that his agency is continuing to task him outside the bounds of the law, given that you, as his advocate, have disallowed his participation in all government programs?

Answer:  Yes, his agency, working as FBI contractor in this case, is defying the law in continuing to harm him through ongoing participation in the Pxxxxxx Program and related initiatives.

4.  To be clear, your older son possesses disability rights.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  And, for the record, the FBI has alleged that my younger son has been sufficiently harmed by Txx Lxxxx and his FBI cohort that he now qualifies for disability rights as well.  However, I have not been allowed to see him or speak with him in order to make that assessment directly.

5.  Does Txx Lxxxx fear prison at this point?  Is this the reason that he is continuing to defame you and harm your children with wrongful demands?

Answer:  I am not in a position to reflect on Txx Lxxxx' legal jeopardy, given his crimes against my family members and myself.  However, I would expect that his career is at stake at the very least.  Under these circumstances, he is becoming more aggressive, to be sure.

6.  What can be done to counter his tactics?

Answer:  Well, again, the FBI needs to disengage with all involvement in human trafficking and other methods of torture and coercion.  My sons and MX should not have been harmed in this manner yesterday, nor on previous days.  This conduct on the part of the agency needs to be viewed under the heading of human atrocities, and the whole of the nation needs to condemn the FBI's conduct in this area without equivocation or misgiving.

7.  How would you evaluate your ability to prevent your older son's human trafficking yesterday?

Answer:  I would describe it as zero influence.  His handler told him to report to his apartment before noon yesterday, so my older son dove into a fake political argument and called an Uber.

8.  How did you respond to his conduct?

Answer:  I began to play some Bach in order to establish a calm and peaceful environment within my kitchen, and then I told him that I believed in his character and integrity, and that I supported his virtue and courage under difficult circumstances.

9.  Yet he still left according to his handler's instructions?

Answer:  Yes, he did.  And right on time.

10.  And shortly after that, was he trafficked again?

Answer:  This is the allegation, yes.

11.  Following his trafficking at the directive of his handler, did he engage in "training" for aggression of some kind?

Answer:  I don't have knowledge of the training he has received through the Pxxxxxx Program, except to know that it has been deeply traumatizing.

12.  Isn't it true that your older son received training yesterday regarding aggression against your own family members?

Answer:  Again, that is beyond any information he has shared with me.  

13.  Is it your impression that the Pxxxxxx Program has engaged in weapons training with your older son?

Answer:  It is, yes.

14.  Why does this seem apparent to you?

Answer:  Because my older son does not deny that he has discharged a firearm under his handlers' directives, and I would never have guided him in this activity in any way, shape or form.  Beyond this, he scrupulously avoids holding knives in the kitchen when in proximity to my husband or myself.  He won't take a letter opener in hand if I am nearby.  And all of these are notable changes from his prior behavior.

15.  Is your impression that he now knows how to wield a knife to cause great harm, specifically because of the training he has received through the Pxxxxxx Program at the directive of the FBI, including Txx Lxxxx?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

16.  And you have mentioned that your older son has been previously tasked with "cleaning" assignments, which are also traumatizing.

Answer:  That is correct.  In fact, my older son was withdrawn from programming at a local mental health organization in Palo Alto, called LxSxxxx, in order for him to participate in traumatizing training through the Pxxxxxx Program.

17.  He was withdrawn from mental health counseling programs without your consent or that of your husband in order to receive violent training through an FBI program?

Answer:  Yes, he was.

18.  May I have your comments regarding this conduct on the part of Txx Lxxxx and the agency?

Answer:  Obviously, there are no limits for Txx Lxxxx' conduct.  The fact that my son was harmed in this manner, even after I explicitly disallowed his participation as his Durable Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney, and the fact that his participation in the Pxxxxxx Program is still occurring, both demonstrate that Txx Lxxxx and his FBI personnel exhibit no respect for the law or American families whatsoever.

19.  What is Txx Lxxxx' objective in this case?

Answer:  Simply to "win."  My impression is that he would like to direct a violent incident inside my home and, no doubt the aftermath would include the loss of my older son's life as well, so as not to leave any loose ends.  A Rob Reiner-style disaster.

20.  You are referring to the fact that Rob Reiner and his wife were killed by their son after a political argument at a Christmas party?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

21.  Do those events seem unusual to you?

Answer:  Rob Reiner had been quite outspoken in his political beliefs.  The tragic events that took his life and that of his wife have all the earmarks of a staged event.  The public political argument a short time before is just a little too neat, but this is the kind of thing the FBI does when it perpetrates assassination under the auspices of Pxxxxxx.  So, yes, the sequence is unusual.

22.  What are the odds of Pxxxxxx Program involvement in this tragedy?

Answer:  I would put the odds at greater than seventy percent on the basis of the staging of the public political argument.  The likelihood that that argument was scripted and that there was a handler guiding the public statements and the timing of those statements at a public event -- these are significant.

23.  How could the truth of this matter come to light?

Answer:  The son's attorney should ascertain whether there is a root canal with an unusual filler material in an upper back molar, and together with that dental procedure, the placement of a communications device that is typical procedure for Pxxxxxx Program participants.  That would be the place to start.  

24.  If that could be established, what would the son's responsibility for these crimes be?

Answer:  After determining the presence of communications with a handler, then you would need to delve into the whole realm of sovereignty violations.  So, the record of "treatments" and "training" perpetrated toward him would need to be obtained and examined in full.  Extensive sovereignty violations have the effect of completely removing an individual's capacity for self-determination, and I think this point is critical for us to understand.

25.  You have emphasized human sovereignty as one of the most important factors determining the future sovereignty of the United States, and, indeed, of the freedom of mankind as a whole.

Answer:  Yes, I have.  Individual sovereignty and national sovereignty are inextricably linked, because any one person can have their sovereignty violated by many of these methods in question.  Our military leadership can be affected.  Our Congressional representatives can be affected.  Our Supreme Court Justices can be affected.  Our DOJ personnel can be affected.  Our Executive Branch can be affected.  There is no national sovereignty without a robust defense of individual sovereignty, and that's why these assaults on self-determination need to be strictly and unequivocally prohibited.

26.  What is the personal impact of sovereignty violations when you view it in the context of your own family?

Answer:  To watch someone you love be overtaken by sovereignty violations of the sort perpetrated by the Pxxxxx Program is to be witness to an overwhelming loss of our best qualities as human beings.  Our courage, our boundaries, our decision-making, our priorities, our deepest human bonds -- all of these are determined by our individual identities, which we have labored over decades of experience to form and nurture and grow.  So, in answer to your question, the personal impact of sovereignty violations in someone you love is devastating.

27.  What is the potential for someone who has suffered extensive sovereignty violations to recover their free will in its entirety?

Answer:  This is unknown to me.  The FBI appears to claim that recovery is possible.  I simply have not seen that claim borne out in anyone who has been profoundly impacted by these human rights crimes.

28.  How would you assess your own sovereignty at this time?

Answer:  It's an irony that, in such a youth oriented culture, people over the age of fifty are less vulnerable to sovereignty violations.  We've simply had more time to strengthen and reinforce our identities, our values, and our decision-making.  All of which is to say that I'm currently doing well.

29.  Do you consider yourself to be lucid and rational in your perspectives about yourself and the wider world?

Answer:  I do.

30.  Yet you would still insist that all sovereignty violations against your family members and yourself be immediately and permanently withdrawn?

Answer:  As a top priority.  Yes.

31.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

The Needs of a Nation: Wisdom, Insight and Preparation

 1.  You attempted to place your Will in a safety deposit box at Chase Bank in Los Altos on Friday, along with querying five other banks.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  What happened, may I ask?

Answer:  I learned that Chase Bank is closing all of its safety deposit boxes for all American consumers across the United States.

3.  All safety deposit boxes are being closed by the largest bank in the United States for all Americans with banking needs?

Answer:  Yes, that is what I was told.

4.  Were you given any explanation for this extraordinary step?

Answer:  Chase Bank can no longer guarantee the security of its safety deposit boxes for Americans.

5.  Was Chase Bank able to refer you to any bank that could effectively guarantee the security of safety deposit box contents?

Answer:  No, it was not.

6.  Why not?

Answer:  I came away with the strong impression that Chase Bank is the first financial institution of many to effect these closures, and that other banks will soon follow.

7.  For what reason?

Answer:  The logical conclusion is that safety deposit boxes depend upon the promise of the financial institution that the boxes are not being inappropriately invaded by third parties.  Once the customer and the bank lose that surety, the model can no longer function.

8.  Who would be invading Americans' safety deposit boxes as unwelcome third parties?

Answer:  Who, indeed?  Who would have enough information to know the contents of the boxes, the insurance of the contents, the health of those possessing title to the boxes, etc.?  That's a lot of information to aggregate, and there are only a few institutions that could have gathered that documentation over time.

9.  Would the FBI have the information?

Answer:  It would, yes.

10.  You have said previously that the FBI has taken control of U.S. banks in a manner that is of significant concern to you.

Answer:  Yes.  We have seen a wholesale change in the privacy policies of the banks, in the wire security guarantees of the banks, and now in the safety deposit box policies of the banks.  So, I'm sure that Jamie Dimond and others have quite a story to tell.

11.  Are we at a point where Americans will be keeping their valuables under their mattresses, as we saw during the Great Depression?

Answer:  Not quite.  But the banks are signaling a separation from the interests of the American consumer and saver, and this information is highly important for the public to understand.

The United States is over-indebted in U.S. dollar-denominated obligations, and our government will at some point seek to pay off those debts in dramatically devalued currency.

So we are going to see dramatic inflation over the next several years, and together with that, we are going to see instability in many financial markets and investment structures, including U.S. banks.

12.  What should the American consumer do at this point?

Answer:  American citizens need to diversify any savings they might possess by considering investments that do well during periods of high inflation.  Certain commodities will hold value.  And we know the President himself is supporting cryptocurrencies, so everyone needs to pay attention to that messaging, however they might independently choose to respond to it.

13.  You're saying that inflation is no accident this time around, but rather intentional government policy?

Answer:  That is exactly so.

14.  There will be a financial crisis that is planned in detail?

Answer:  There will, yes.

15.  You have asked to see records relating to your case within the DOJ, but you have also been told that those records are at risk of being altered.

Answer:  It's best for me to see records directly at this time without anticipating their contents.  The FBI has disclosed to me the amount of awards extended in my name and identity, so I am expecting to see documentation that demonstrates fealty to those numbers.

16.  There should be full disclosure to you?

Answer:  Yes, there should be.

17.  You don't necessarily believe that all aspects of your case can be rendered public.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  Not all aspects of this case can be rendered public at this time, due to complexities regarding various governmental initiatives.  That said, there should be full disclosure to me regarding my own case, its adjudication, its awards, its detailed timeline to date.

18.  In the meantime, you are wandering around while maintaining possession of your own Will, due to the fact that it could disappear from other locations that have traditionally been regarded as "secure."

Answer:  Well, this is the reason I have published the Will online.  My circumstances do not allow for the usual privacy measures regarding estate documentation.  I have made clear to my sons and my husband that I hope to update my Will with the assistance of an attorney.  But the latest draft of my Will, a holographic document that is properly prepared and executed in keeping with the laws of California, is dated December 11, 2025.

So right now, I look forward to direct engagement with an attorney who will obtain documents from the DOJ which convey full disclosure of this case to me up to the current date.

19.  With full disclosure, will you consider that a confidential dialogue with your attorney has commenced?

Answer:  I expect a confidential dialogue with my attorney from the very beginning, which is to say that I expect to have attorney/client privilege upheld, and I expect that my attorney will represent my interests over and above those of other parties, despite what may be remarkable influence extended by others.

It really will not work for members of the FBI to be sabotaging my communications with my attorney by perpetrating the usual slander and defamation that is the specialty of people like Txx Lxxxx.  If this is allowed, the consequences for the perpetrators will be quite severe.

20.  Who will prevent that slander from being repeated?

Answer:  We will see.  I don't think it is reasonable to expect the FBI to suddenly grow a conscience regarding the agency's wrongdoing in this matter.  Txx Lxxxx is not a person who will be experiencing remorse, shame, regret or doubt about his crimes against my family.  To the contrary, in the past he has demonstrated an unusual proclivity for aggression at the precise moment he should be apologizing.  So, restraint is not within this person's toolbox.  Is it possible that the DOJ could effectively cut off his communications with those attorneys who may assist me in the future?  I think it is, and I think this step would be wise for everyone involved.

21.  What about the threats of FBI affiliates to harm your whole family if you persist in your right to see the details of your case with full disclosure?

Answer:  Of course, it's likely that Txx Lxxxx would like to see his career worries vanish through an act of violence.  But I think he may be prevented from proceeding down that path, given the contents of my Will dated December 11, 2025.

22.  You have expressed deep concern for the preservation of Americans' human rights in the long term.

Answer:  That is correct.  I have.  And the reason for this is that we cannot allow the agencies to perpetrate human trafficking, falsified law enforcement reporting, and sovereignty violations -- all of these standing separate and apart from their mission and objectives -- if we hope that human rights will endure within the United States and among our allies over the long term.  These activities have been hugely profitable for the FBI and its affiliates.  But they are indelibly and irresponsibly wrong, and they will condemn all of us to a nation that is diminished beyond all recognition if we fail to counter them.

23.  What do the American people need in their leadership in the long term?

Answer:  In the long term, they will need the truth if their freedom is to be preserved in any meaningful form.  That means that ultimately, someone will need to possess the courage to express to the public what our greatest challenges are and how we can solve them together.  We have not yet begun that renewed alliance between governance and the governed, but this is the necessity on which all of our hopes as a nation rely.

24.  Will we recognize the inflection points that will allow that renewed alliance to be formed?

Answer:  This is a critical question, because those inflection points will not last long.  We need to be ready for them by regarding the future with great wisdom, insight and preparation.

25.  Do you feel that that preparation can commence at this time?

Answer:  It must begin at this time, yes.  The government is striving for consensus among its central leadership team regarding short term objectives, but regarding the longer term, more dialogue will be needed.

26.  And not necessarily public dialogue at this moment?

Answer:  No.  Not necessarily.

27.  Will you please update us regarding your family members' health, your pets' health, your own health, as you are able?

Answer:  Of course, and I am grateful for your concern for us.

28.  That you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

December 11, 2025 Will of Lane MacWilliams

 

Biometric Documentation

OIG Hotline, please find attached two photos of my hands taken by my husband on December 9, 2025.  My fingers are unusually long and tapered, and these photos show the patterning of veins in both hands.  The pisiform bone at the outer edge of my wrist is prominent.  So these images should be useful from a biometric perspective.  Thank you for adding them to your Office's documentation.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

UPDATE: OIG Hotline Interview Questions for the Sons of an FBI Whistleblower

UPDATE:

OIG Hotline, for various reasons, it would be helpful to begin any discussions with my sons and MX with the following questions.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

1.  Did you receive "medical attention" directed by your handler or his associates over the last 72 hours for any reason?

2.  Was there an injection involved?

3.  Were you told that that injection was for your own good?

4.  Following that injection, were you presented with paperwork from your handler or agency?  

5.  Was that paperwork falsely attesting that one or both of your parents had committed fraud, espionage, human trafficking, child abuse or terrorism?

6.  Were you offered financial remuneration if you signed those false testaments?  How much, please, and in what form?

7.  Were you threatened with a lack of medical treatment for diseases caused by the FBI and its affiliates if you refused to sign the documentation provided to you?

8.  Were some of the forms provided to you wrongfully alleging that you made your own decisions in fulfilling the express directives of your handlers, Txx Lxxxx, and his associates?

9.  Did some of the forms provided to you wrongfully allege that you were abused by one or both of your parents during your childhood?

10.  Did some of the forms provided to you wrongfully allege that one or both of your parents harmed others during your childhood or later?

11.  Were you directed to release a non-conventional vector of illness within your parents' home, targeting pets or human beings, within the last 72 hours?

12.  Did you do so?

13.  Do you think that it may represent a conflict of interest for Txx Lxxxx and your other handlers to be directing you in these ways in an effort to exculpate themselves of their own guilt regarding wrongful directives, torture, and human trafficking toward you over a period of years?

14.  How do you think this cycle of lying, false reports, coercion, monetary awards and financial theft by Txx Lxxxx and his associates can be halted decisively?

15.  What can the DOJ do at this point to allow you to speak honestly and openly to your parents about the extensive harm you have experienced?

16.  What can the DOJ do to ensure that your parents are involved in any and all discussions regarding your recovery?

17.  What will it take for you to feel safe within the United States or elsewhere in the future?

18.  What can the DOJ do to facilitate those steps on an immediate basis?

*********************************************************************************

OIG Hotline, every effort should be made to reach out to both of my sons and MX to ask the following questions of my loved ones as soon as possible.

Thank you for your support regarding these critical concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*******************************************************************************

1.  Have you been raped or experienced forced human trafficking by your handlers or their associates within the last 48 hours?

2.  Have you experienced other forms of torture, specifically electric shock "treatment," within the last 48 hours?

3.  Has your handler ever ordered you to report to another apartment or condominium within your building of residence?  Have you experienced rape or torture there?  How recently?

4.  Has your health been harmed in any manner whatsoever by the actions of your handlers or their associates within the last several weeks?  Within the last several months?  What are the specific harms you have suffered?

5.  Has restorative medical care been withheld from you unless you provide knowingly false witness statements regarding your own family members to the FBI, the DoD, or others?

6.  Has the FBI ordered you to sign knowingly false statements, written by others, concerning your childhood, your mother, your father, or your sibling?  Have others ordered you to do so?  Have you been threatened with death if you elect not to do so?

7.  Have employees, contractors or associates of the FBI, including the DoD, ever entered your apartment or condominium and proceeded to punch, kick, slap or beat you in order to coerce you to sign false statements regarding your own family?  How recently did this occur?

8.  Have you ever been told that you have received a high level order to sign false statements regarding your family members?  From whom?  How recently did this occur?

9.  Has your handler ever told you that the United States is currently experiencing a civil war, perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates?  How recently has he done so?

10.  Have you ever been told by your handler, FBI personnel, or FBI affiliates that you could be ordered to participate in a public shooting or public violence against your will?  How recently were you told this?

11.  Have you ever been told by your handler, FBI personnel, or FBI affiliates that your suicide would constitute a "patriotic act"?

12.  Have you ever been ordered by your handler to pick up a package with contents unknown to you and then drop it off elsewhere without your ever having been made aware of the package's contents?  How recently did this occur?

13.  Have you ever been told by your handler that you have been tried and/or convicted of weapons trafficking or terrorism as a direct result of moving a package in that manner?  How recently did this occur?

14.  Have you ever been ordered by your handler, the FBI or FBI affiliates to harm your own family members?  When did this occur?

15.  Have you been given a deadline of December 31, 2025 by which to have perpetrated harm against your family members?  Who conveyed this deadline to you?  

16.  Do you know whether high-level authorization was given for you to harm your family members?  Do you know the name of the person who authorized this initiative?

17.  Have you been ordered to place an explosive device within your parents' home or car, or in a public place with the specific intent of causing grievous injury to one or both of your parents?

18.  Have you been ordered to contaminate your family members' food or drink in some manner?

19.  Have you been ordered to place a radioactive device or perpetrate chemical or biological contamination at your parents' home or at their property?

20.  Have you been ordered to release a "non-conventional vector" of disease at your parents' home or within their cars, intended to cause death within several weeks?

21.  Have you ever been told by your handler that you have been designated as a "Code Red" by a high-level elected or appointed official within the United States' military chain of command?

22.  Do you know what a Code Red is?

23.  Have you ever been told by your handler or his affiliates that, after the provision of knowingly false witness statements about your family, or after the commission of harm against your family, you will be killed in order to ensure your silence regarding the torture you have experienced at the hands of the FBI and others?

24.  Have you been informed that the FBI's South Bay Chief of Station has been charged with crimes against your family for his role in initiating knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, and resultant physical harm, against your family members and yourself?

25.  If this individual is persisting in attempting to wrongfully blame your family members for his own crimes, what disciplinary actions should he now face?

26.  How can the U.S. Department of Justice best support you as you attempt to inform your parents of the full extent of torture you have suffered at the hands of the FBI and it affiliates?

My Return to the Country I Love

 OIG Hotline, please be apprised that I returned to the United States at 11:59 PM on December 7, 2025.  

In order to arrive at my home in Portola Valley early this morning, I drove in two twelve hour segments, staying overnight in Lake Oswego at the Hilton Garden Inn.

I drove primarily at night in order to travel more quickly, with fewer stops.  My puppies were able to sleep at night during our travel, and the trip was easier on them with this schedule.

I filled up the car with gas in California, close to Shasta Lake, last night.  My attempt to refill my car was denied twice at one gas station and once at another.  (The fourth try worked.)  One pump listed on the viewscreen, "Please wait while we determine your security status," or something quite similar.  I have never seen such a statement before, though I have once -- during the last two weeks -- been denied the ability to refill my car through yet another non-functioning pump that was listed as being in full working order.

I need to observe that, for a woman alone to be refused gas for her car in the middle of a rural area at night represents a serious safety risk.

There were two cars at the Shasta gas station last night, one of which was a white van whose driver approached me when the other vehicle left.  The driver stated, apropo of nothing, that I looked "lost" and "out of place" before asking whether I needed assistance.

I told him "No.  I'm fine."

His assertions seemed plainly scripted, consistent with an intention to falsely report that I was in distress in some manner.

The real risk was, ironically, caused by the stranger approaching me at the behest of Txx Lxxxx' FBI cohort in the middle of the night.

Today, I unloaded my car of my suitcases and belongings only to have two gardeners immediately appear at 55 Vista Verde Way, raking leaves that were not in urgent need of disposal.

Meanwhile, two women, allegedly Jehovah's Witnesses, spoke together at the top of my driveway for at least twenty minutes, doing nothing.

Eventually, they descended my driveway, at which point I courteously explained that I was just returning from six months of travel and was unable to speak with them.

They appeared to seek permission to return, but I will not be conversing with these individuals for two reasons.  First, Jehovah's Witnesses have a history of being extremely intolerant of Americans with other faiths, and I feel this stance is unconstitutional.  Second, I do not believe it is appropriate for any people of faith to be paid to file false witness statements about others.

For your full information, I left Canada to return to the United States at this time, because there appeared to be the placement of a child's belonging within my hotel suite without my knowledge or consent, a circumstance I immediately reported to hotel management and one I consider to be particularly indefensible for its possible implications regarding knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

In addition, demands for false witness statements from hotel staff and guests appeared to be escalating.

Having said that, I am profoundly grateful to Canada for its welcome over the past six months.  Many Canadians approached this case with the highest ethics, and I appreciate their honor, their integrity and their commitment in doing so.

Canada, as close ally of the United States, shares our interest in ensuring that the long term human rights of their people are honored and upheld in every regard.

This is to confirm that all of my conduct while traveling, as at all other times, was lawful and honorable, reflecting the highest character and integrity, as always.

This is also to confirm that my puppies did not interact with others during our travel, except perhaps to bark from the back seat during a drive-through at McDonald's, or while parked at a rest stop.

I was able to clean up after them thoroughly within our hotel room in Lake Oswego, and our room was left in clean and serviceable condition, without damage.

I have no means of verifying whether the FBI initiated a fake 911 call from my room during our stay, but this allegation was extended to me.  To verify, I made no 911 call, nor did I send any messages or texts indicating distress or a need for emergency services.

One man at a rest stop appeared to attempt to approach us with his Dachsund, but because the rest stop was relatively dark, with poor lighting, I guided my dogs back to our car immediately.

During rest stops, I called my husband in order to enhance our safety and security, speaking to him throughout our time in public.

Because I elected not to leave my dogs alone during our trip, due to the fact that my car has been broken into previously with my dogs inside, a Burger King server brought our meal to my car when it was ready.

All went smoothly in this instance, as one would expect.

I will close this account by expressing that it was with a sense of joy and celebration that I re-entered the United States.

The border official seemed to indicate that all was in order regarding my file, even though a work permit had been mailed to me from Canadian immigration without my having applied for one.

Allegedly, the FBI was attempting to cause harm to me on the basis of this documentation, because those with a work permit are required to demonstrate a successful job application within a limited time period.  Without this, a violent immigration raid apparently becomes possible.  I doubt that this work permit was legal, because I had never applied for it.  But it could have occasioned physical harm to me, nonetheless.

Why did I return to the United States with a sense of celebration and homecoming?  Because this country, committed to its freedom, fiercely independent, insistent on its good faith, supportive of  Constitutional rights, still stands as a beacon of human potential worldwide, one that must not be diminished.

Americans know that our long term liberty can only be preserved if the long term liberty of our families, our neighbors, our communities, is preserved alongside our own.

I stand by our future, and I am here to help make it.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams