OIG Hotline, the following communications were extended by me to your Office and to Attorney Danielle Miller of Loeb and Loeb, an estate planning attorney in Los Angeles, with whom I had scheduled a consultation at 1:30 PM today, January 2, 2026.
Please be aware that my Will consists of a holographic document dated December 11, 2025. There are no updates to this document or revisions of this document at this time.
Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams
**********************************************************************************
Sent to Danielle Miller and Bekah Patton at 12:21 PM on January 2, 2026
From: Lane MacWilliams
Danielle, I am looking forward to reaching out to you for our phone call this afternoon at 1:30 PM. Please let me know via email if there are any adjustments to your schedule.
Before our conversation, I wish to mention to you that I am a human rights advocate. Due to my role in this capacity, I need to preface our dialogue with a few minor requests.
I am a highly honorable and law-abiding person, and I presume that we are initiating this discussion in good faith, with attorney/client privilege in place and -- as Bekah's efforts have established in advance -- avoidance of all conflict of interest. If you need to discuss this further, please let me know the best manner in which this can be arranged.
I am assuming that confidentiality needs in estate planning normally preclude any recording of phone calls or consultations between attorney and client. Likewise, I am assuming that confidentiality provisions in estate planning prevent discussions with third parties regarding attorney/client dialogue, as well as preventing written attestations for third parties regarding attorney/client conversations. Again, if you need to discuss this further, please let me know.
Of course, an ethical attorney would always need to report any unlawful confession or suspicious circumstance that arose during a conversation with a client. Since I am entirely law-abiding, this is not going to be a concern.
To prevent any demands from third parties for false characterization of our conversations, I would simply ask that you email me within 15 minutes of the conclusion of any consultation we have to express any concerns to me in writing, allowing me to give you any needed clarification. If you do reach out, I will endeavor to respond to you immediately.
Assuming this will not be necessary, I will send a follow up email to our conversation, thanking you for our talk.
In the absence of an email from you expressing concerns immediately following a consultation, you will be confirming that our conversation was a good faith dialogue between attorney and client, and one that was lawful and honorable in every respect.
Thank you for allowing me to extend this background, Danielle. I hope it will serve to simplify our progress.
I look forward to speaking with you soon.
Kind regards,

Lane MacWilliams
********************************************************************************
Sent to Danielle Miller and Bekah Patton at 1:21 PM on January 2, 2026
From: Lane MacWilliams
Danielle, one other important note:
Because third parties may attempt to invalidate my pre-existing estate documents by requesting an attestation from an attorney that I am not cognizant of my assets, their location, or my family members, or by requesting an attestation that I do not possess legal capacity due to illness, injury, or otherwise, this email will serve as our mutual agreement that you will not endeavor for any reason or under any circumstances to assert that I do not possess legal capacity to make financial decisions, to engage in estate planning, or to make any other sort of legal and binding determinations regarding my estate.
Thank you for your agreement in this matter.
Kind regards,

Lane MacWilliams
**********************************************************************************
Sent to Danielle Miller and Bekah Patton at 2:16 PM on January 2, 2026
From: Lane MacWilliams
Danielle, I appreciate our consultation today.
This email serves as our agreement that our conversation today was lawful in all respects, and that both you and I demonstrated legal capacity and cogency during the full duration of our talk.
To review what we discussed, I began our call by referencing two emails I sent to you and Bekah today, at 12:21 PM and 1:21 PM. I asked whether you had received them, and you acknowledged that you had.
While initially, you stated that you had not had time to consider my emails in detail, you later specified that my confirmation that you would avoid all conflict of interest in representing me, described in my email sent at 12:21 PM, presented a problem for you.
You described your conflict of interest concerns regarding your representation of me as nuanced, and you felt that you would not be able to meet my expectations that my own interests would be prioritized over and above the interests of others.
Danielle, I am grateful for your insistence on calling attention to this concern.
As you know, conflict of interest matters are so fundamental to the realm of legal representation that they are front and center for every Bar association within the United States, and rightly so.
I regret that you did not have the freedom to engage in the ethical representation that I require.
That said, I extend best wishes to you in your future endeavors.
Regards,

Lane MacWilliams
********************************************************************************
Email to the OIG Hotline at 2:48 PM on January 2, 2026
From: Lane MacWilliams
This material, along with any and all affiliated investigative findings, is to be rendered broadly public, including its placement in my documents made available to the public in perpetuity by a repository within the Smithsonian Institution.
********
At this particular time, no assessments against accounts bearing my name or associated with my identity should be allowed through allegations of wrongdoing on the part of one or more of my family members or on the part of myself, or on the basis of documentation from me allowing withdrawals, given that such documentation would represent forgeries. Please note that this should include misspellings of my name, including Lane Macwilliams (small W), Lane Mac Williams, Lane McWilliams, Carol Elaine Von Herzen, Lane von Herzen, and any variations on the above. Settlements should not be extended to my sons or MX in any manner that represents withdrawals from my accounts, nor should settlements be extended in any form to my sons without my express knowledge and consent, given capacity concerns. At this time, I grant the OIG Hotline my permission to address misconduct by the FBI and its affiliates. Resulting penalties against the FBI or its affiliates may be funded to my accounts, but assessments may not be withdrawn for any reason at this time. Accounts affiliated with my name, any variations of my name, and/or my identity should be treated as locked, with the exception that deposits may occur.
********
OIG Hotline, please see my follow up email, included below, to Attorney Danielle Miller.
At this time, it is necessary for me to disclose that the FBI has appeared to allege that Txx Lxxxx has been in direct communication with Attorney Miller for weeks.
Beyond this, the FBI has appeared to allege that Danielle Miller has accepted substantive pay through her "witness informant" and secrecy agreements with the FBI or its affiliate agencies -- and that this pay has been possibly drawn from misappropriations of funds awarded in my own case within the U.S. DOJ.
As such, Attorney Miller's highly unusual objections to being held to ethical requirements regarding confidentiality and conflict of interest provisions established by the California Bar Association are particularly notable.
Given Txx Lxxxx' alleged convictions for crimes against my family members and myself regarding my case, please consider this communication to be a complaint against him and against the FBI and any of its affiliates for violating my right to legal representation in my attempt to engage in estate planning with formal representation.
I believe that Attorney Danielle Miller should be interviewed by OIG Hotline investigators on an immediate basis to determine the manner in which she was first contacted by Txx Lxxxx or his affiliates, and further, the manner in which my family members and I were defamed through those communications, thus preventing me from obtaining unbiased representation.
The amount of her compensation should be fully characterized by your Office, as should its source.
Beyond this, all of Txx Lxxxx' communications regarding Attorney Danielle Miller and her assistant Bekah Patton, or extended to Danielle Miller directly or to her assistant Bekah Patton, should be aggregated for the full documentation of my case.
Txx Lxxxx should suffer a substantive career penalty for his conduct regarding this matter, and he should be prohibited from engaging in any such obstruction in the future.
I am highly displeased about the conduct of the FBI in this instance, as in myriad others.
I do deserve highly ethical estate planning representation, and this right of access must be restored to me on an immediate basis.
Thank you for allowing me to register this serious concern.
Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams