The Namesake

 OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to be alleging that I am being extended a 90-day respite from knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting concerning my family members and myself.

Having said that, with CIA involvement in this case at FBI request, I have learned something about the way in which these agencies work.

One of the primary ways in which they prey upon their victims, innocent "targets of interest," is by telling them what they want to hear.

This is a fundamental credo of psychopathic pathology.

In telling victims what they want to hear, the FBI knows that "targets of interest" will let their guards down in the hope that finally their ordeal might be halted peaceably and honorably.

I do happen to know something about the FBI's mission and objectives as they pertain to United States civilians at this time.  And, while I cannot disclose them in this setting, I will say that they inform my determination to take charge of this case with all the tools and resources that have been provided to me.

The FBI appears to allege that it has recently focused on coercing knowingly false witness statements from a family member's colleagues in Sxxxx Cxxxx in furthering a knowingly false "espionage" case against him.  Specifically, the FBI has appeared to refer to these false witnesses as "sheep" who are simply doing what they are told in signing previously prepared witness statements which have no basis in reality.

It will perhaps come as no surprise to you that I will not be tolerating such conduct in silence, acquiescence, or meek obedience to wrongful authority.

Our nation has a major challenge due to the FBI's insistence on creating the permanent architecture to allow falsified law enforcement reporting against every single American citizen, by creating fake dossiers that can be deployed against our most honorable people at the FBI's whim.

As I have previously made clear, this false reporting is not required for the FBI's mission and objectives.

The FBI simply wants this illusion of legal and moral rectitude, alongside the absolute power that falsified law enforcement reporting confers to them.

I believe the American public must ultimately and unanimously deny the FBI's wish in this regard.

If our nation is to defend its sovereignty to become the global leader in critical issues such as environmental sustainability, and the myriad issues which contribute to that preservation -- if our people are to retain individual sovereignty so that the right to choose between benevolent acts and malevolent ones, between unity and division, between kindness and gratuitous cruelty is to remain the inviolable province of each individual -- if Americans' human rights are to be upheld over the long term, so that our greatest potential as scientists, artists, inventors, leaders, teachers, discoverers, and explorers is to be fulfilled -- then the FBI cannot maintain its authoritarian threat over our nation in the form of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

May I observe something?  Renee Nicole Good was killed in Minneapolis last week in a manner that now looks to the majority of Americans like an execution.  After the agent who shot her had discharged his weapon for the third time, the words he allegedly spoke were "fxxxxxx bxxxx."

Good people, this ICE officer had been provided with extensive defamation regarding Renee Nicole Good ahead of time.

Nothing this woman said or did in the moment could possibly have justified that level of fury on the part of ICE agent Jonathan Ross.

And this is the effect of defamation:  hatred, distrust, division and aggression.

And I need to point out to everyone that the FBI has made a detailed study of how to defame innocent people so that others will respond to them in exactly this manner.

The agency calls them child molesters, human traffickers, sexual predators, spies, terrorists, thieves and murderers -- and, along with those astonishing claims, it provides AI-generated video, AI-generated audio, and AI-generated still photos, AI-generated emails and AI-generated texts, allegedly collected from the "dark web" and other hidden sources, as proof of guilt.  

And this material is believable enough to convince law enforcement authorities, members of the lay public, physicians, Uber drivers, accountants, judges, professors, house cleaners, and car mechanics that the individual is a terrible human being who deserves the worst possible treatment humanity can muster.

I am here to say that America is better than this.

We are capable of questioning the data centers that are being constructed all over the nation for the purpose of aggregating false and defamatory material about our loved ones, our friends, our neighbors, and even our pets.

And if we are empowered to envision a future that allows for trust between honorable people, then we will ultimately insist that the architecture of deceit be dismantled in favor of our deep and courageous bonds to one another as Americans.

Those of us who love this nation understand that the opportunity for the United States to emerge as a global leader in the realm of environmental sustainability will depend on our demonstration that we are a worthy nation, with honest aims, with a courageous and benevolent people who refuse to forsake one another, despite the demands of wrongful authority.

Governor Tim Walz is demonstrating the integrity to ask the state of Minnesota to investigate the killing of Renee Nicole Good, separate and apart from the FBI, and with the full knowledge that Jonathan Ross was granted federal immunity.

Now, in turn, we all need to ask ourselves, should the FBI be allowed to kill the American "good" alongside its namesake?

Or do all of us possess the goodwill and commitment to one another that will ensure the American "good" cannot and will not die?

Honorable people, can we really allow the FBI to separate truth and justice from the American ethos?

Or can we now insist that we will not relinquish our virtue to this agency, now or ever?

Lane MacWilliams