Threats to Older Son and Younger Son of Human Rights Advocate Lane MacWilliams

OIG Hotline, please be informed that current threats extended to my older son by third parties previously identified for your Office allegedly include both forced suicide and coerced harm toward others.  In addition, there appear to be ongoing references to a directive that he unlock one or more doors to allow access to our home overnight.

Current threats to my younger son and daughter-in-law by third parties previously identified for your Office allegedly pertain to a violation of international law in some manner, presented as an order through the Chain of Command.  While I have no independent verification of such an event, it would seem that additional judicial review of this situation may be warranted, and through the involvement of Justices who have the opportunity to review previous decisions on this matter.

Allegations of threats to the flights of my younger son and daughter-in-law, comprising information I do not possess, continue to be extended.  Parallel threats to the travel of other family members appear to be alleged as well.

It is alleged that video, AI-generated or otherwise, is being utilized in an attempt to coerce false witness statements from both of my sons and my daughter-in-law to wrongfully justify further aggression by the FBI and its affiliates against my husband and/or myself, and against our pets.

Because of the potential for any false witness statements to result in catastrophic aggression against one or more of my loved ones, I would respectfully request that any and all such coerced material be regarded as false and defamatory until such time as I may participate in my own defense and that of my loved ones to refute knowingly wrongful claims.

Thank you for your intervention in this matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

New Claim

OIG Hotline, due to the pressing possibility of misappropriation of substantive financial resources, and, furthermore, due to my responsibility to ensure the safety of those funds, I hereby formally claim all funds awarded in my name, a variation of the spelling of my name, or associated with my identity relating to my complaint against the FBI and its affiliate agencies, contractors and associates throughout the entire time period of my case.

Please reach out to me with regard to any documentation I need to provide to you on an immediate basis given my responsibility for the safety of the funds described herein.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Insistence at the Critical Hour

 1.  The FBI has allegedly indicated that there is a planned home invasion regarding your Portola Valley residence in the early morning hours of December 30, 2025.  

Answer:  December 30, 2025, yes.

2.  Tonight, in other words.

Answer:  Tonight.  

3.  What are your comments about this allegation, please?

Answer:  It is allegedly based on AI-generated false reporting from an affiliate agency of the FBI.  So there is an attempt to offload the culpability to other agencies and contractors, which is typical for the FBI when the agency plans to do the wrong thing.

4.  And is there a planned power outage associated with this reportedly planned home invasion?

Answer:  Allegedly, yes.  A planned power outage, a simultaneous first- and second-floor home invasion, a kidnapping, and removal to a black site in Guatemala.  All of these far-fetched claims have been alleged.

5.  Do you give them any credence?

Answer:  Over time, I have seen that the FBI and its affiliates are far more unbalanced and extreme than is publicly known.  They generally respond to calls for accountability with heightened aggression.

6.  By "heightened aggression" do you mean plans of first-degree murder?

Answer:  Well, when the FBI plans at length to wrongfully harm, defame, implicate and kill an honorable American family, most of us would consider that to be first-degree murder, yes.  If there are trillions of dollars on the line in accounts bearing the name of a "high value target," then special circumstances may be said to be present.

7.  Under what justification could FBI affiliates possibly seek to abduct you or your family members under these circumstances?

Answer:  FBI affiliates rely on false terrorism allegations in these instances, allegedly.  They aggregate false messaging or emails and then make an argument before a judge that the "high value target" represents a threat to U.S. interests or persons, or is planning terrorist activities.

8.  Does any of this apply to you?

Answer:  It does not apply to me in any way whatsoever.

9.  Are we now at the point at which a virtuous American who is advocating for the sovereignty of the nation is suddenly a "terrorist" when certain individuals wish to steal her accounts?

Answer:  This is a pressing risk for us, it would appear.

10.  It was alleged weeks ago that the FBI was given a deadline of December 31st of taking the lives of your family members and you yourself, so as to facilitate the theft accounts affiliated with your name or identity.  Who directed the agency to meet this deadline?

Answer:  Who, indeed?

11.  And if this deadline is not met?  Is there any intention to engage in honorable outreach to you regarding your case to date?

Answer:  If there are those who genuinely care about the long term future of the American people, then the intention to engage in honorable outreach will emerge quickly.

12.  How can you decisively disprove the false allegations of the FBI and its affiliated agencies?

Answer:  I would need to examine the false evidence and speak in my own defense, as is my Constitutional right.  When judicial proceedings are concealed from the American public, allowing false evidence to be presented with the intention of meting out harm up to and including capital punishment against the virtuous, then our foundational human rights over the long term have been placed in profound jeopardy.

13.  When you and your older son walked your dogs this afternoon, were you engaging in suspicious behavior?

Answer:  Absolutely not.  Walking two puppies is not suspicious behavior.  My puppies are not suspicious, Their leashes are not suspicious.  My honorable conversation with my son is not suspicious.

14.  Is your son's hxxxxxx suspicious?

Answer:  The fact that my son's hxxxxxx has allegedly directed my son to open the door to the second-floor balcony of my home when told to do so in the early hours of the morning is suspicious, yes.

15.  What about the wrongful directives allegedly extended to your younger son?  Is it suspicious that they appear to have originated with Txx Lxxxx, who is already allegedly implicated in myriad crimes against your family?

Answer:  If Txx Lxxxx is shown to have played any role whatsoever in extending further wrongful directives toward my family members, this would represent corruption, not suspicious activity.

16.  Why can't he acknowledge his wrongdoing?

Answer:  It is possible that the FBI would rather silence him than allow such a condemnatory acknowledgement.

17.  Can his crimes against your family be resolved through honorable outreach?

Answer:  It is fair to say that honorable outreach is necessary to define and resolve those concerns.

18.  Can you and your family be safe under the current circumstances?

Answer:  We can strive for safety, and we can ask that others strive on our behalf.

19.  You, in turn, are striving for the long term future of many Americans.

Answer:  Yes, I am.  

20.  Can American freedoms endure in the long term?

Answer:  Only if we insist that they prevail.

21.  Thank you for speaking with us tonight.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Fair Warning

 My father, who was an infinitely wise man, exercised extraordinary restraint in situations that would have driven most people to exasperation.

His patience was superhuman.

The fuse on his temper was as long as an undersea communications cable, spanning the continental shelf.

But one never wanted to exhaust it.

Occasionally, very occasionally, he would utter the words "Fair warning." 

This was a gift to whoever had crossed his boundaries.

He only said it once.  One time.  If you didn't hear him, God help you.

I myself only rarely utter these words.

But I am speaking them now.

If a member of my family, whether related to me by blood or by marriage, has failed to register as a foreign agent while traveling in a foreign country -- after I informed the DOJ that this matter needed to be corrected -- such a lapse would make the Executive Branch look extremely culpable of malfeasance.

If a member of my family, whether related to me by blood or by marriage, carried or transferred a package with unknown contents at the directive of his handlers while within the United States or while traveling in a foreign country -- after I informed the DOJ that this matter needed to be corrected -- such a lapse would make the Executive Branch look extremely culpable of malfeasance.

If a member of my family, whether related to me by blood or by marriage, were forced by their handlers to engage in human trafficking activities or drug trafficking activities within the United States or while traveling within a foreign country -- after I informed the DOJ that this matter needed to be corrected -- such a lapse would make the Executive Branch look extremely culpable of malfeasance.

If a member of my family, whether related to me by blood or by marriage, engaged in a Pxxxxxx Program assignment of any kind while within the United States or within a foreign country -- after I informed the DOJ that this matter needed to be corrected -- such a lapse would make the Executive Branch look extremely culpable of malfeasance.

If a member of my family, whether related to me by blood or by marriage, engaged in communications that implicated him or her of wrongdoing of any kind while within the United States or within a foreign country -- after I informed the DOJ that this matter needed to be corrected -- such a lapse would make the Executive Branch look extremely culpable of malfeasance.

If a member of my family, whether related to me by blood or by marriage, provided knowingly false witness statements at the directive of his or her handlers or others -- after I informed the DOJ that this matter needed to be corrected -- such a lapse would make the Executive Branch look extremely culpable of malfeasance.

To the FBI and its affiliated agencies:  Hands off my family.  Hands off my children.  Hands off my friends.  Hands off my pets.  Hands off myself.

To the good people involved in this case, and I know that some of them are advocating for us within the Executive Branch, I am endeavoring to make myself eminently clear.

The future freedoms of Americans cannot and will not be held hostage to the further harm of those I love by the foreign adversaries of the United States.

Fair warning to those who would -- whether now or in the future -- seek to entrap, ensnare, corner, coerce, compel, corrupt, extort, harm, defame or defile my family.

The truth is a persistent task master.  And no one is exempt from the truth's full illumination, nor from the dispassionate stare of history in evaluating the full course of events.

Now is the time to remember the import of these words and their pressing requirement that decision-making demonstrate greater wisdom, greater understanding, and finer judgment.

Lane MacWilliams

You Can Count On Me

When my grandmother was alive, she always used to combine family Christmas invitations with a follow up question:  Can we count on you?

She entertained large and boisterous crowds at Christmastime, and she wanted to know if we would be among them.

Would there be two turkeys or three?  Four pies or five?  Enough love for a gaggle or enough love for a throng?  

These things were important, and she was planning them with matriarchal authority.

Some of the most transformative truths among family members are never spoken, but it's miraculous when they are.

Who hugs whom first and longest and best?  Who speaks the longed for words during Grace before the meal?  Who sits closest?  Who laughs loudest?  Who asks for compassion and who receives it?

The best answer to all of these questions is You can count on me.

This is what my grandmother taught me, and this is what I am speaking again, in her honor.

You can count on me.

My family members know this is true, and I hope, on this Christmas Day, 2025, that the wider world feels that way, too.

Merry Christmas to all those who hold high hopes for our loved ones, our neighbors, our nation, and the magnificent blue orb that we call home.

Lane MacWilliams

A Novelist Claims Her Own Original Work

 OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to allege that Txx Lxxxx has committed perjury in wrongfully withholding evidence against him for his role in a criminal conspiracy in this case. 

The FBI appears to mention Txx Lxxxx’ wrongful claim of plagiarism pertaining to my own original work. For the record, I possess the original notebooks in which all of my original works have been composed and can produce them upon request. 

Further, the writing of my first novel was witnessed by my husband (then fiancé) with whom I lived during its composition. 

The writing of my second novel occurred in the three years following my marriage, so my husband witnessed my daily labors with this literary work as well. 

My third novel has evolved over a long period, with my husband, my colleagues, the Yaddo Foundation (which provided me with a fellowship based on my original work), hundreds of participants in a related short film project, and an Oscar-winning film producer David Parfitt assisting me with a related screenplay. As with my other works, I possess my original handwritten notebooks of the narrative.

My original screenplay related to my novel is formally copyrighted by the U.S. copyright office. (Unless the FBI has altered this record, the original screenplay is fully protected.  And I possess the copyright certificate. )

There are so many people who know of my original authorship of the novel and screenplay, there really could be no open contest regarding the truth of this matter. 

The fact that Txx Lxxxx is alleged to have completed my third novel through ghost writing and to have sold it in Germany, and allegedly online in some form, constitutes inexcusable and incalculable theft. 

For the FBI to investigate Txx Lxxxx’ crime without allowing me to present my extensive evidence of my original  authorship represents a travesty of justice, if in fact such an inanity occurred. 

Whatever the case in the past, my claim of my own intellectual property must be re-established unequivocally and entirely, and Txx Lxxxx must be held accountable for his crimes in this matter. 

Ultimately, who will want to be part of a nation when the FBI is stealing and selling their intellectual property?

No scientist, no novelist, no inventor, no composer would ever wish to make the United States their home if the lowest criminals such as Txx Lxxxx are allowed to prevail in the theft, betrayal, perfidy, and contempt for the labors of the honest public. 

I love my writing. The NEA found me meritorious enough to award me a literary fellowship, and they were not alone in acknowledging my original gifts. 

The worst of the worst American criminals should not be allowed to wrest my talent, my labors, my reputation, my family members, my dignity or my accounts from my full ownership. 

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

A Request for Intervention from President Trump

President Trump, please insist that my sons and daughter-in-law be immediately and honorably discharged from all government programs.

The apparent intent by the FBI and its affiliate agencies to extract false witness statements from them, to order them to engage in conduct involving harming the innocent public, and thus to "legally" ensure the deaths of my entire family through misguided and concealed judicial proceedings cannot be justified.

No President would wish this type of indefensible FBI conduct to compromise his legacy.

No one would wish to be remembered as a leader who allowed the FBI to prey upon the most virtuous Americans for profit.

And no elected official would wish to be known as allowing the FBI to repeatedly violate the safety and sovereignty of the children of a highly honorable advocate for the long term human rights of all Americans as the agency profiteered from accounts bearing her name and/or identity.

My sons both now possess disabilities due to the wrongful and predatory acts of the FBI and its affiliates, and as such, their disability rights must be acknowledged and upheld.

As my older son's Durable Power of Attorney and Durable Medical Power of Attorney, I have already withdrawn him from all government programs.

I have not been allowed to see my younger son in order to assess his capacity since recent injuries caused by his handler, but, certainly, this visit -- now scheduled for Christmas Eve -- should be facilitated by all involved in this case.

Mr. President, let's stop facilitating those among the FBI and its affiliates who have harmed my family, and let's discuss the very real changes that need to be implemented if the fundamental freedoms of Americans are to endure in the long term.

Outreach to me is needed at this time, along with immediate protection of my family.

Thank you for your concern and your intervention in this critical matter.

Sincerely yours,

Lane MacWilliams

A Message to the Human Traffickers Within the FBI: The Truth and I Will Outlast You

OIG Hotline, this documentation stands as my formal complaint that both of my sons are being tasked with Pxxxxxx Program "assignments" at this time, both first-degree "assignments" and "cleaning assignments."

They are both being directed by their handlers to engage in these activities under threat of grievous bodily harm and death.

I cannot speak to the safety of MX, but I must assume that she has been unacceptably imperiled as well.

False witness statements have allegedly been coerced from all of them.

In the meantime, the FBI appears to be sending me communications that "it doesn't have to be this way," that I can "pay" some unspecified ransom for my sons' freedom from this continuing torture and abuse.

I will observe as objectively as possible at this time that the FBI and its affiliates appear to be engaging in terror tactics against the American public, and my family foremost among them, for the purpose of both sadistic entertainment and profiteering.

What am I to make of apparent allegations that the FBI films the crimes its handlers are coercing, or that FBI personnel then take those films to a courtroom somewhere for the express purpose of condemning the "perpetrators" (also innocent victims of this predatory agency) to capital punishment?

What is our nation to make of the fact that the victims of the FBI and its affiliates have no opportunity for rebuttal, redress, or formal defense in a court of law?

Instead, these court proceedings transpire without their participation, knowledge, notification or consent.

It is only afterwards that their handlers are all too happy to disclose that they have been "convicted" of "crimes" their handlers imposed on them in the first place.

Good people, I have not named my sons' handlers in this documentation.  Nor have I here named those who have authorized this astonishing abuse of power from within the halls of government.

However, I respectfully request that, within documentation provided to the Smithsonian Institution regarding this incident and all those that preceded it, my sons' handlers be identified by their full names.  With regard to my older son, it seems that his primary handler is Axxxxx, last name presently unknown.  However, it seems that Txx Lxxxx is directing Axxxxx through regular communications, despite the cross-agency link from FBI to CIA.  

In the case of my younger son and MX, Txx Lxxxx appears to be dictating their harm more directly through FBI personnel and affiliates, and even through direct communication with my son and MX themselves.

My sons and MX should have the option of privacy through redaction of their names within materials provided to the Smithsonian Institution and the public at large.

Their handlers should not receive the same courtesy.

I ask that those who have authorized this misconduct be identified for the full information of the public when evaluating these events in the future.

On an immediate basis, my sons and MX should receive urgent and honorable discharge from all government service, now and in the future, under the auspices of any program whatsoever.

They all require medical attention, psychological care, rehabilitation and compassion.  All of their stories should be told in the manner that they themselves determine once their sovereignty has been restored to them.

What is the price tag we choose to place on the safety and sanctity of America's children?

What is the cost of their protection from a predatory FBI?

What is the value of their separation from this wayward agency's exploitation in human trafficking, drug trafficking, and first-degree crimes?

How can the American public be expected to negotiate with the terrorists that FBI personnel have now apparently become?

Good people, the FBI needs to understand that the virtue of our nation is not for sale, the wellbeing of our children is not a "deal" to be made, and the sovereignty of the United States is not to be held hostage to those whose self-interest drives their every initiative.

The FBI has a difficult set of mission and objectives.

Raping and trafficking America's children does not stand among them.

All of us are responsible for making clear to this agency that confusion, equivocation, or uncertainty on this point are unacceptable failures of institutional conduct.

Penalties for the FBI and its affiliate agencies must be swift and severe, and should include profound career penalties for the agents involved in the trafficking and torture of America's children and youth for profit.

Likewise, there should be no possibility that the perpetrators of these crimes can profiteer from them later by "settling" with my sons or MX only to place their settlement funds in accounts controlled by their agencies, thus allowing rapid theft of their contents.

Nor should it be possible for others to make claims against accounts bearing my name or affiliated with my identity.  This, too, would only serve to incentivize the ongoing torture of my family and the families of many other Americans.

Aside from funds provided to the Smithsonian Institution for the purpose of the creation of an exhibit of my verified documents, my accounts should be locked.  Deposits may be added, but withdrawals should not be permitted at this time.

I will be providing further information to your Office regarding these events.

To all those involved in the ongoing harm of my children, I will say this:

Our nation stands far above you.  Our values of care and concern for the vulnerable will illuminate your actions for public scrutiny in perpetuity.  And at that point, I hardly think your family members and friends will identify you with anything other than shame and disgrace to our people.  The truth is insistent so long as the virtuous demand that it be revealed.  So, I make that demand, on behalf of my own children, and on behalf of America's children alongside them.  

If the truth makes you tremble, then tremble.  If the truth makes you cry, then cry.  If the truth makes you rage, then rage.  

But know that the truth only serves to strengthen me, to hearten me, to renew me.

And this is the reason the truth and I will outlast you.

Lane MacWilliams

Still Standing: The Insistent Defense of Sovereignty for the American People

1.  Your sons are allegedly still being asked to cause harm to your family.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  Where are these directives coming from?

Answer:  My sons are allegedly receiving them as Executive orders.

3.  Orders from the Executive Branch?

Answer:  Yes.

4.  Your sons were both wrongfully conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program, entirely against their will, and with the express intention of coercing them to provide knowingly false witness statements regarding your family that would lead to your deaths, and, ultimately, their own.  Is that your understanding?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

5.  Over recent days, what has happened to your sons and your daughter-in-law?

Answer:  Torture, human trafficking, Pxxxxxx Program "assignments," and "cleaning assignments."  Agency personnel probably directed them to move a few packages from one place to another so that they could wrongfully claim drug dealing or terrorism activity.

6.  In addition to all of those horrors, did the FBI and its affiliates coerce your sons and daughter-in-law to provide knowingly false witness statements regarding your family?

Answer:  This is always part of the drill.  Once their sovereignty is decimated, then their handlers demand that false witness statements -- which have already been composed -- be signed.  As soon as that is accomplished, those statements are taken into a courtroom somewhere and the FBI argues for capital punishment for crimes of which we know nothing whatsoever.

7.  What crimes do you think the FBI -- and I'm assuming that Txx Lxxxx is leading the charge on this initiative -- is alleging that you and/or your husband may have committed through aggregating false witness statements from your sons and daughter-in-law?

Answer:  Well, the unconstitutional part of this is that I have no idea.  At various points, the FBI has indirectly claimed that it is wrongfully accusing us of everything from mental illness to espionage to human trafficking to terrorism to child abuse to capital crimes.  We just don't know, and, not having the wrongful accusations to examine, we have scant means of defending ourselves.

8.  Your sons have confirmed for you many times that they had happy childhoods and suffered no abuse whatsoever.  Isn't that true?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

9.  So, why is Txx Lxxxx circling back to this false accusation?

Answer:  The FBI appears to have stated that his own father abused him in his childhood.  If so, there is likely psychiatric pathology driving this particular individual.  It's possible that he never found the strength of character to accuse his own father.  Instead, he may be taking satisfaction in accusing innocent American parents.  This represents the psychological phenomenon known as projection.

But some have appeared to suggest that the FBI is also routinely accusing Americans of Communism, prostitution, drug abuse and a whole set of other unlawful behaviors.

10.  Is Txx Lxxxx' career on the line because he staged a set of unknown crimes at your family's property on Cape Cod?

Answer:  Again, this has not been disclosed to me directly.  But quite a few people have appeared to suggest that Txx Lxxxx has repeatedly defamed me regarding to crimes he staged at one or more of my properties.

11.  And you have now requested that all of this information be transferred to the Smithsonian Institution.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  I'm not fearful of complete illumination of this matter.  The FBI is.  So, I have requested that all documentation be transferred to the Smithsonian.  If I am alive and well, I will assist in curating that exhibit, which should exist in perpetuity.  If not, all legitimate documents should be made available to the public for their examination.

12.  Do you include all documentation pertaining to your sons in materials you wish to be transferred to the Smithsonian at this time?

Answer:  Yes, I do.  I am serving as Durable Power of Attorney for my older son, so I have the legal standing to insist that this information be included.

13.  Why is this important?

Answer:  Because my sons and daughter-in-law have had their sovereignty stolen from them, yet the American public has no idea what that means.

14.  What does it mean?

Answer:  It means that an individual has his or her free will erased, and in its place, the FBI will be dictating their words, their actions, their attestations about the past, their health, their medications, their sanity, their relationships, their marriages, their finances, their intimacy, whether they have children, their education, their friends, where they live, whether they can travel, and the manner and timing of their deaths.

That's what it means.

15.  Anything else?

Answer:  When there is this degree of totalitarian control over an individual, then their potential for development is strictly circumscribed -- and this means their intellectual development, their social development, their emotional development and their spiritual development are dramatically diminished.

So, that's a fair characterization of how devastating sovereignty violations by the FBI actually are, and it's a realistic portrait of our future if we do nothing about the course we're currently taking.

16.  Because of the fact that the stakes are so high for humanity, you want the logs of the torture and trafficking crimes of the FBI affiliates against your sons to be made available to the American public.

Answer:  Yes, I do.  Their names can be redacted, but all of the information regarding the crimes against their sovereignty, and what the FBI did to them following the loss of their self-determination, should be made public.

17.  We have always, throughout human history, assumed that free will would remain intact for humanity, haven't we?

Answer:  The works of classical antiquity, thousands of years old, spend a great deal of time on the concept of free will.  The Greeks were tremendously interested in the manner in which the character of a person determined their fate, and Sophocles and Homer and Aeschylus were all profoundly concerned with the course of human destiny as defined by self-determined human identity.  

Lucretius wrote about the fact that, even though the outer world may "strike against a man"* to act in a certain way, he may choose to exercise restraint.  He may choose to resist.

So, yes, we have assumed that free will would remain available to us.  And when we remove mankind's ability to choose his own words and his own actions, then we lose everything that is meaningful to human civilization.

18.  Given the nature of human rights violations currently transpiring through the FBI and its affiliates, what are the chances that we will be able to rescue the most important facets of human sovereignty?

Answer:  In the short term, we are not likely to rescue sovereignty, unfortunately.  Our circumstances are now too imperiled by the climate crisis and other challenges, and the FBI is not inclined to withdraw its sovereignty violations against the public at this time.

But in the long term, we may be able to insist that sovereignty return to us.  That's what I'm striving for, and that's why I'm asking others to strive alongside me.

And to be clear, sovereignty does not mean that we're deciding whether to have the vanilla or the chocolate ice cream cone.

It means that we're deciding whether our lives will be filled with learning, epiphany, friendship, genuine love for one another, scientific discovery, masterworks of art, sustainable stewardship of the environment, spiritual growth, and advancement in every area of human potential we can imagine.

So, this matters, and it matters more than anything else we've ever done.

19.  Given the tremendous concerns, what can be done in the short term to try to hold onto the best of our humanity?  What can you do regarding your own circumstances when your two sons are being wrongfully directed to take the lives of your family members as a Christmas gathering?

Answer:  Illumination is always the answer regarding these intended crimes.  Txx Lxxxx is attempting to take the lives of my family members for the purpose of profiteering from funds awarded in my name pertaining to my complaint against the FBI through the OIG Hotline at the U.S. Department of Justice.  So, those accounts, with the exception of those funds I have designated for the Smithsonian Institution, should be locked and inaccessible at this time.

20.  The FBI has encouraged you to give up this battle for the future of our nation and the freedom of our people, hasn't it?

Answer:  There is no giving up.  If we love our children, our neighbors, our nation, and our wider world, there is no giving up.  

All that is best within us -- our courage, our fortitude, our faith, our kindness, our leadership, our deepest bonds to one another, and our vision for the future -- depends on our perseverance against wind and weather.

21.  And you're still standing.

Answer: I'm still standing, and I'm still expressing my gratitude for those who are choosing to stand with me in defense of the sovereignty of our nation and the American people.

22.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

*Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, referenced by Stephen Greenblatt, The Swerve, W.W. Norton, copyright 2011, First Edition, p. 189.

The Smithsonian Institution

OIG Hotline, this document is to confirm that I specify that five billion dollars from awards extended in my name or affiliated with my identity are to be transferred to the Smithsonian Institution on an immediate basis as an endowment dedicated to the Museum's aggregation, preservation, and display of my documentation for the American public and others.

Together with these funds, all materials related to my case should also be transferred in a secure manner at this time.

The selection of materials to be included in this exhibition is to transpire with my direct assistance or that of my named Executor, my husband.

Please note that I retain copyright to all of materials written by me.

If neither I nor my husband are available to assist in curating the content of this exhibit, all verified content by me relating to my case should be made available to the American public by the Smithsonian Institution in perpetuity. 

The Smithsonian is to be permitted to invest this five billon dollar endowment, or a portion thereof, in long term holding of commodities at this time.

Other than this designated transfer of funds, my accounts are to remain locked for the time being.  No assessments against accounts bearing my name or associated with my identity should be allowed through allegations of wrongdoing on the part of one or more of my family members or on the part of myself, through allegations of incapacity or mental illness on my part, or on the basis of documentation from me allowing withdrawals, given that such documentation would represent forgeries.

Please note that my accounts include those affiliated both with misspellings and correct identification of my name, including Lane Macwilliams (small W), Lane Mac Williams, Carol Elaine Von Herzen, Lane von Herzen, and any variations on the above.  Settlements should not be extended to my sons or daughter in law in any manner that represents withdrawals from my accounts, nor should settlements be extended in any form to my sons without my express knowledge and consent, given capacity concerns.  At this time, I grant the OIG Hotline my permission to address misconduct by the FBI and its affiliates that may have occurred during an interim period when this was disallowed.  Resulting penalties against the FBI or its affiliates may be funded to my accounts, but assessments may not be withdrawn for any reason at this time, other than the Smithsonian designation above.  

To reconfirm, other than the Smithsonian allotment described above, accounts affiliated with my name, any variations of my name, and/or my identity should be treated as locked, with the exception that deposits may occur.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

 

Respect Where Respect Is Due

 OIG Hotline, at 7:23 PM Pacific time, I sent your Office an email with the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Attestation of Confidence by KPM.

The content of the text exchange between my husband and myself regarding this subject is as follows:

LM to KPM:  Kxx, I'm pleased that you have confirmed my right to my perspective regarding Dxxxxx's circumstances, which are by no means his own fault.  Your confirmation of my powers of reasoning, my cogency, my stability and my impressive resilience in the face of adversity is important from many points of view, and not least as a measure of your enduring respect for my judgment and my insight.  Thank you for your confidence in me as your wife, as an insightful mother to our children, and as a person of great substance and courage in the wider world.

KPM to LM:  You have my respect and my love Darling Person.  You have been a supportive, fiercely loving parent to our children, and a person of reason and insight.

LM to KPM:  Thank you for your confidence in me, Kxx.  I appreciate your truthful support, and your trust in my ability and my judgment.

Please let there be no more questions about my psychological stability and resilience.  It may be a miracle that I am as profoundly resolute and determined to support the sovereignty of our nation and our citizens as I am.  But that stalwart commitment is not a delusion, a psychosis, a myth or a dream.  It is a necessity on which every worthy leader's hopes for our country rely.  

I ask that there be no further attempts to say that those Americans of great fortitude and commitment to our nation have lost their minds.  This type of defamation is an insult to Americans' joint endeavor to build and rebuild a community of trust, talent, truthfulness and hope for the future.  

And we do not need to rely on the FBI's misogynistic tropes that lean toward accusations of histrionics, mental instability, and promiscuity toward every talented woman who comes into view.  This is outdated bias that is mostly shocking for its primitive regression to a time when women were not uncommonly institutionalized if they possessed a valuable inheritance and insufficiently loyal male relatives.

I happen to have only had one intimate partner over my lifetime as of this writing, that of my honorable husband of the last thirty five years.  But if I had had two or ten, I believe my character and integrity would be the same.

Let's insist on better conduct from the FBI and its affiliates with regard to its knowingly false accusations about highly honorable women, and let's do so right away, please.

Thank you for allowing me to express these serious concerns.

Lane MacWilliams

Rebutting Further False Allegations Directed By Wayward FBI Personnel

 1.  It seems that your older son is being threatened with death by his handlers unless he falsely alleges that you are mentally ill or unstable, and thus unqualified to receive awards extended in your name through the U.S. DoJ and its affiliates.  Is this your impression?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  My older son is allegedly being asked to sign false witness statements that dovetail with false witness statements from my younger son, and I'm sure that both sets of falsehoods are being thoroughly vetted by Txx Lxxxx, whose career within the FBI is now on the line due to his lies about me in the past.

2.  Aren't you currently serving as Durable Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney for your older son?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

3.  So, isn't it the case that his agency is continuing to task him outside the bounds of the law, given that you, as his advocate, have disallowed his participation in all government programs?

Answer:  Yes, his agency, working as FBI contractor in this case, is defying the law in continuing to harm him through ongoing participation in the Pxxxxxx Program and related initiatives.

4.  To be clear, your older son possesses disability rights.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  And, for the record, the FBI has alleged that my younger son has been sufficiently harmed by Txx Lxxxx and his FBI cohort that he now qualifies for disability rights as well.  However, I have not been allowed to see him or speak with him in order to make that assessment directly.

5.  Does Txx Lxxxx fear prison at this point?  Is this the reason that he is continuing to defame you and harm your children with wrongful demands?

Answer:  I am not in a position to reflect on Txx Lxxxx' legal jeopardy, given his crimes against my family members and myself.  However, I would expect that his career is at stake at the very least.  Under these circumstances, he is becoming more aggressive, to be sure.

6.  What can be done to counter his tactics?

Answer:  Well, again, the FBI needs to disengage with all involvement in human trafficking and other methods of torture and coercion.  My sons and MX should not have been harmed in this manner yesterday, nor on previous days.  This conduct on the part of the agency needs to be viewed under the heading of human atrocities, and the whole of the nation needs to condemn the FBI's conduct in this area without equivocation or misgiving.

7.  How would you evaluate your ability to prevent your older son's human trafficking yesterday?

Answer:  I would describe it as zero influence.  His handler told him to report to his apartment before noon yesterday, so my older son dove into a fake political argument and called an Uber.

8.  How did you respond to his conduct?

Answer:  I began to play some Bach in order to establish a calm and peaceful environment within my kitchen, and then I told him that I believed in his character and integrity, and that I supported his virtue and courage under difficult circumstances.

9.  Yet he still left according to his handler's instructions?

Answer:  Yes, he did.  And right on time.

10.  And shortly after that, was he trafficked again?

Answer:  This is the allegation, yes.

11.  Following his trafficking at the directive of his handler, did he engage in "training" for aggression of some kind?

Answer:  I don't have knowledge of the training he has received through the Pxxxxxx Program, except to know that it has been deeply traumatizing.

12.  Isn't it true that your older son received training yesterday regarding aggression against your own family members?

Answer:  Again, that is beyond any information he has shared with me.  

13.  Is it your impression that the Pxxxxxx Program has engaged in weapons training with your older son?

Answer:  It is, yes.

14.  Why does this seem apparent to you?

Answer:  Because my older son does not deny that he has discharged a firearm under his handlers' directives, and I would never have guided him in this activity in any way, shape or form.  Beyond this, he scrupulously avoids holding knives in the kitchen when in proximity to my husband or myself.  He won't take a letter opener in hand if I am nearby.  And all of these are notable changes from his prior behavior.

15.  Is your impression that he now knows how to wield a knife to cause great harm, specifically because of the training he has received through the Pxxxxxx Program at the directive of the FBI, including Txx Lxxxx?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

16.  And you have mentioned that your older son has been previously tasked with "cleaning" assignments, which are also traumatizing.

Answer:  That is correct.  In fact, my older son was withdrawn from programming at a local mental health organization in Palo Alto, called LxSxxxx, in order for him to participate in traumatizing training through the Pxxxxxx Program.

17.  He was withdrawn from mental health counseling programs without your consent or that of your husband in order to receive violent training through an FBI program?

Answer:  Yes, he was.

18.  May I have your comments regarding this conduct on the part of Txx Lxxxx and the agency?

Answer:  Obviously, there are no limits for Txx Lxxxx' conduct.  The fact that my son was harmed in this manner, even after I explicitly disallowed his participation as his Durable Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney, and the fact that his participation in the Pxxxxxx Program is still occurring, both demonstrate that Txx Lxxxx and his FBI personnel exhibit no respect for the law or American families whatsoever.

19.  What is Txx Lxxxx' objective in this case?

Answer:  Simply to "win."  My impression is that he would like to direct a violent incident inside my home and, no doubt the aftermath would include the loss of my older son's life as well, so as not to leave any loose ends.  A Rob Reiner-style disaster.

20.  You are referring to the fact that Rob Reiner and his wife were killed by their son after a political argument at a Christmas party?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

21.  Do those events seem unusual to you?

Answer:  Rob Reiner had been quite outspoken in his political beliefs.  The tragic events that took his life and that of his wife have all the earmarks of a staged event.  The public political argument a short time before is just a little too neat, but this is the kind of thing the FBI does when it perpetrates assassination under the auspices of Pxxxxxx.  So, yes, the sequence is unusual.

22.  What are the odds of Pxxxxxx Program involvement in this tragedy?

Answer:  I would put the odds at greater than seventy percent on the basis of the staging of the public political argument.  The likelihood that that argument was scripted and that there was a handler guiding the public statements and the timing of those statements at a public event -- these are significant.

23.  How could the truth of this matter come to light?

Answer:  The son's attorney should ascertain whether there is a root canal with an unusual filler material in an upper back molar, and together with that dental procedure, the placement of a communications device that is typical procedure for Pxxxxxx Program participants.  That would be the place to start.  

24.  If that could be established, what would the son's responsibility for these crimes be?

Answer:  After determining the presence of communications with a handler, then you would need to delve into the whole realm of sovereignty violations.  So, the record of "treatments" and "training" perpetrated toward him would need to be obtained and examined in full.  Extensive sovereignty violations have the effect of completely removing an individual's capacity for self-determination, and I think this point is critical for us to understand.

25.  You have emphasized human sovereignty as one of the most important factors determining the future sovereignty of the United States, and, indeed, of the freedom of mankind as a whole.

Answer:  Yes, I have.  Individual sovereignty and national sovereignty are inextricably linked, because any one person can have their sovereignty violated by many of these methods in question.  Our military leadership can be affected.  Our Congressional representatives can be affected.  Our Supreme Court Justices can be affected.  Our DOJ personnel can be affected.  Our Executive Branch can be affected.  There is no national sovereignty without a robust defense of individual sovereignty, and that's why these assaults on self-determination need to be strictly and unequivocally prohibited.

26.  What is the personal impact of sovereignty violations when you view it in the context of your own family?

Answer:  To watch someone you love be overtaken by sovereignty violations of the sort perpetrated by the Pxxxxx Program is to be witness to an overwhelming loss of our best qualities as human beings.  Our courage, our boundaries, our decision-making, our priorities, our deepest human bonds -- all of these are determined by our individual identities, which we have labored over decades of experience to form and nurture and grow.  So, in answer to your question, the personal impact of sovereignty violations in someone you love is devastating.

27.  What is the potential for someone who has suffered extensive sovereignty violations to recover their free will in its entirety?

Answer:  This is unknown to me.  The FBI appears to claim that recovery is possible.  I simply have not seen that claim borne out in anyone who has been profoundly impacted by these human rights crimes.

28.  How would you assess your own sovereignty at this time?

Answer:  It's an irony that, in such a youth oriented culture, people over the age of fifty are less vulnerable to sovereignty violations.  We've simply had more time to strengthen and reinforce our identities, our values, and our decision-making.  All of which is to say that I'm currently doing well.

29.  Do you consider yourself to be lucid and rational in your perspectives about yourself and the wider world?

Answer:  I do.

30.  Yet you would still insist that all sovereignty violations against your family members and yourself be immediately and permanently withdrawn?

Answer:  As a top priority.  Yes.

31.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

The Needs of a Nation: Wisdom, Insight and Preparation

 1.  You attempted to place your Will in a safety deposit box at Chase Bank in Los Altos on Friday, along with querying five other banks.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  What happened, may I ask?

Answer:  I learned that Chase Bank is closing all of its safety deposit boxes for all American consumers across the United States.

3.  All safety deposit boxes are being closed by the largest bank in the United States for all Americans with banking needs?

Answer:  Yes, that is what I was told.

4.  Were you given any explanation for this extraordinary step?

Answer:  Chase Bank can no longer guarantee the security of its safety deposit boxes for Americans.

5.  Was Chase Bank able to refer you to any bank that could effectively guarantee the security of safety deposit box contents?

Answer:  No, it was not.

6.  Why not?

Answer:  I came away with the strong impression that Chase Bank is the first financial institution of many to effect these closures, and that other banks will soon follow.

7.  For what reason?

Answer:  The logical conclusion is that safety deposit boxes depend upon the promise of the financial institution that the boxes are not being inappropriately invaded by third parties.  Once the customer and the bank lose that surety, the model can no longer function.

8.  Who would be invading Americans' safety deposit boxes as unwelcome third parties?

Answer:  Who, indeed?  Who would have enough information to know the contents of the boxes, the insurance of the contents, the health of those possessing title to the boxes, etc.?  That's a lot of information to aggregate, and there are only a few institutions that could have gathered that documentation over time.

9.  Would the FBI have the information?

Answer:  It would, yes.

10.  You have said previously that the FBI has taken control of U.S. banks in a manner that is of significant concern to you.

Answer:  Yes.  We have seen a wholesale change in the privacy policies of the banks, in the wire security guarantees of the banks, and now in the safety deposit box policies of the banks.  So, I'm sure that Jamie Dimond and others have quite a story to tell.

11.  Are we at a point where Americans will be keeping their valuables under their mattresses, as we saw during the Great Depression?

Answer:  Not quite.  But the banks are signaling a separation from the interests of the American consumer and saver, and this information is highly important for the public to understand.

The United States is over-indebted in U.S. dollar-denominated obligations, and our government will at some point seek to pay off those debts in dramatically devalued currency.

So we are going to see dramatic inflation over the next several years, and together with that, we are going to see instability in many financial markets and investment structures, including U.S. banks.

12.  What should the American consumer do at this point?

Answer:  American citizens need to diversify any savings they might possess by considering investments that do well during periods of high inflation.  Certain commodities will hold value.  And we know the President himself is supporting cryptocurrencies, so everyone needs to pay attention to that messaging, however they might independently choose to respond to it.

13.  You're saying that inflation is no accident this time around, but rather intentional government policy?

Answer:  That is exactly so.

14.  There will be a financial crisis that is planned in detail?

Answer:  There will, yes.

15.  You have asked to see records relating to your case within the DOJ, but you have also been told that those records are at risk of being altered.

Answer:  It's best for me to see records directly at this time without anticipating their contents.  The FBI has disclosed to me the amount of awards extended in my name and identity, so I am expecting to see documentation that demonstrates fealty to those numbers.

16.  There should be full disclosure to you?

Answer:  Yes, there should be.

17.  You don't necessarily believe that all aspects of your case can be rendered public.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  Not all aspects of this case can be rendered public at this time, due to complexities regarding various governmental initiatives.  That said, there should be full disclosure to me regarding my own case, its adjudication, its awards, its detailed timeline to date.

18.  In the meantime, you are wandering around while maintaining possession of your own Will, due to the fact that it could disappear from other locations that have traditionally been regarded as "secure."

Answer:  Well, this is the reason I have published the Will online.  My circumstances do not allow for the usual privacy measures regarding estate documentation.  I have made clear to my sons and my husband that I hope to update my Will with the assistance of an attorney.  But the latest draft of my Will, a holographic document that is properly prepared and executed in keeping with the laws of California, is dated December 11, 2025.

So right now, I look forward to direct engagement with an attorney who will obtain documents from the DOJ which convey full disclosure of this case to me up to the current date.

19.  With full disclosure, will you consider that a confidential dialogue with your attorney has commenced?

Answer:  I expect a confidential dialogue with my attorney from the very beginning, which is to say that I expect to have attorney/client privilege upheld, and I expect that my attorney will represent my interests over and above those of other parties, despite what may be remarkable influence extended by others.

It really will not work for members of the FBI to be sabotaging my communications with my attorney by perpetrating the usual slander and defamation that is the specialty of people like Txx Lxxxx.  If this is allowed, the consequences for the perpetrators will be quite severe.

20.  Who will prevent that slander from being repeated?

Answer:  We will see.  I don't think it is reasonable to expect the FBI to suddenly grow a conscience regarding the agency's wrongdoing in this matter.  Txx Lxxxx is not a person who will be experiencing remorse, shame, regret or doubt about his crimes against my family.  To the contrary, in the past he has demonstrated an unusual proclivity for aggression at the precise moment he should be apologizing.  So, restraint is not within this person's toolbox.  Is it possible that the DOJ could effectively cut off his communications with those attorneys who may assist me in the future?  I think it is, and I think this step would be wise for everyone involved.

21.  What about the threats of FBI affiliates to harm your whole family if you persist in your right to see the details of your case with full disclosure?

Answer:  Of course, it's likely that Txx Lxxxx would like to see his career worries vanish through an act of violence.  But I think he may be prevented from proceeding down that path, given the contents of my Will dated December 11, 2025.

22.  You have expressed deep concern for the preservation of Americans' human rights in the long term.

Answer:  That is correct.  I have.  And the reason for this is that we cannot allow the agencies to perpetrate human trafficking, falsified law enforcement reporting, and sovereignty violations -- all of these standing separate and apart from their mission and objectives -- if we hope that human rights will endure within the United States and among our allies over the long term.  These activities have been hugely profitable for the FBI and its affiliates.  But they are indelibly and irresponsibly wrong, and they will condemn all of us to a nation that is diminished beyond all recognition if we fail to counter them.

23.  What do the American people need in their leadership in the long term?

Answer:  In the long term, they will need the truth if their freedom is to be preserved in any meaningful form.  That means that ultimately, someone will need to possess the courage to express to the public what our greatest challenges are and how we can solve them together.  We have not yet begun that renewed alliance between governance and the governed, but this is the necessity on which all of our hopes as a nation rely.

24.  Will we recognize the inflection points that will allow that renewed alliance to be formed?

Answer:  This is a critical question, because those inflection points will not last long.  We need to be ready for them by regarding the future with great wisdom, insight and preparation.

25.  Do you feel that that preparation can commence at this time?

Answer:  It must begin at this time, yes.  The government is striving for consensus among its central leadership team regarding short term objectives, but regarding the longer term, more dialogue will be needed.

26.  And not necessarily public dialogue at this moment?

Answer:  No.  Not necessarily.

27.  Will you please update us regarding your family members' health, your pets' health, your own health, as you are able?

Answer:  Of course, and I am grateful for your concern for us.

28.  That you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

December 11, 2025 Will of Lane MacWilliams

 

Biometric Documentation

OIG Hotline, please find attached two photos of my hands taken by my husband on December 9, 2025.  My fingers are unusually long and tapered, and these photos show the patterning of veins in both hands.  The pisiform bone at the outer edge of my wrist is prominent.  So these images should be useful from a biometric perspective.  Thank you for adding them to your Office's documentation.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

UPDATE: OIG Hotline Interview Questions for the Sons of an FBI Whistleblower

UPDATE:

OIG Hotline, for various reasons, it would be helpful to begin any discussions with my sons and MX with the following questions.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

1.  Did you receive "medical attention" directed by your handler or his associates over the last 72 hours for any reason?

2.  Was there an injection involved?

3.  Were you told that that injection was for your own good?

4.  Following that injection, were you presented with paperwork from your handler or agency?  

5.  Was that paperwork falsely attesting that one or both of your parents had committed fraud, espionage, human trafficking, child abuse or terrorism?

6.  Were you offered financial remuneration if you signed those false testaments?  How much, please, and in what form?

7.  Were you threatened with a lack of medical treatment for diseases caused by the FBI and its affiliates if you refused to sign the documentation provided to you?

8.  Were some of the forms provided to you wrongfully alleging that you made your own decisions in fulfilling the express directives of your handlers, Txx Lxxxx, and his associates?

9.  Did some of the forms provided to you wrongfully allege that you were abused by one or both of your parents during your childhood?

10.  Did some of the forms provided to you wrongfully allege that one or both of your parents harmed others during your childhood or later?

11.  Were you directed to release a non-conventional vector of illness within your parents' home, targeting pets or human beings, within the last 72 hours?

12.  Did you do so?

13.  Do you think that it may represent a conflict of interest for Txx Lxxxx and your other handlers to be directing you in these ways in an effort to exculpate themselves of their own guilt regarding wrongful directives, torture, and human trafficking toward you over a period of years?

14.  How do you think this cycle of lying, false reports, coercion, monetary awards and financial theft by Txx Lxxxx and his associates can be halted decisively?

15.  What can the DOJ do at this point to allow you to speak honestly and openly to your parents about the extensive harm you have experienced?

16.  What can the DOJ do to ensure that your parents are involved in any and all discussions regarding your recovery?

17.  What will it take for you to feel safe within the United States or elsewhere in the future?

18.  What can the DOJ do to facilitate those steps on an immediate basis?

*********************************************************************************

OIG Hotline, every effort should be made to reach out to both of my sons and MX to ask the following questions of my loved ones as soon as possible.

Thank you for your support regarding these critical concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*******************************************************************************

1.  Have you been raped or experienced forced human trafficking by your handlers or their associates within the last 48 hours?

2.  Have you experienced other forms of torture, specifically electric shock "treatment," within the last 48 hours?

3.  Has your handler ever ordered you to report to another apartment or condominium within your building of residence?  Have you experienced rape or torture there?  How recently?

4.  Has your health been harmed in any manner whatsoever by the actions of your handlers or their associates within the last several weeks?  Within the last several months?  What are the specific harms you have suffered?

5.  Has restorative medical care been withheld from you unless you provide knowingly false witness statements regarding your own family members to the FBI, the DoD, or others?

6.  Has the FBI ordered you to sign knowingly false statements, written by others, concerning your childhood, your mother, your father, or your sibling?  Have others ordered you to do so?  Have you been threatened with death if you elect not to do so?

7.  Have employees, contractors or associates of the FBI, including the DoD, ever entered your apartment or condominium and proceeded to punch, kick, slap or beat you in order to coerce you to sign false statements regarding your own family?  How recently did this occur?

8.  Have you ever been told that you have received a high level order to sign false statements regarding your family members?  From whom?  How recently did this occur?

9.  Has your handler ever told you that the United States is currently experiencing a civil war, perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates?  How recently has he done so?

10.  Have you ever been told by your handler, FBI personnel, or FBI affiliates that you could be ordered to participate in a public shooting or public violence against your will?  How recently were you told this?

11.  Have you ever been told by your handler, FBI personnel, or FBI affiliates that your suicide would constitute a "patriotic act"?

12.  Have you ever been ordered by your handler to pick up a package with contents unknown to you and then drop it off elsewhere without your ever having been made aware of the package's contents?  How recently did this occur?

13.  Have you ever been told by your handler that you have been tried and/or convicted of weapons trafficking or terrorism as a direct result of moving a package in that manner?  How recently did this occur?

14.  Have you ever been ordered by your handler, the FBI or FBI affiliates to harm your own family members?  When did this occur?

15.  Have you been given a deadline of December 31, 2025 by which to have perpetrated harm against your family members?  Who conveyed this deadline to you?  

16.  Do you know whether high-level authorization was given for you to harm your family members?  Do you know the name of the person who authorized this initiative?

17.  Have you been ordered to place an explosive device within your parents' home or car, or in a public place with the specific intent of causing grievous injury to one or both of your parents?

18.  Have you been ordered to contaminate your family members' food or drink in some manner?

19.  Have you been ordered to place a radioactive device or perpetrate chemical or biological contamination at your parents' home or at their property?

20.  Have you been ordered to release a "non-conventional vector" of disease at your parents' home or within their cars, intended to cause death within several weeks?

21.  Have you ever been told by your handler that you have been designated as a "Code Red" by a high-level elected or appointed official within the United States' military chain of command?

22.  Do you know what a Code Red is?

23.  Have you ever been told by your handler or his affiliates that, after the provision of knowingly false witness statements about your family, or after the commission of harm against your family, you will be killed in order to ensure your silence regarding the torture you have experienced at the hands of the FBI and others?

24.  Have you been informed that the FBI's South Bay Chief of Station has been charged with crimes against your family for his role in initiating knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, and resultant physical harm, against your family members and yourself?

25.  If this individual is persisting in attempting to wrongfully blame your family members for his own crimes, what disciplinary actions should he now face?

26.  How can the U.S. Department of Justice best support you as you attempt to inform your parents of the full extent of torture you have suffered at the hands of the FBI and it affiliates?

My Return to the Country I Love

 OIG Hotline, please be apprised that I returned to the United States at 11:59 PM on December 7, 2025.  

In order to arrive at my home in Portola Valley early this morning, I drove in two twelve hour segments, staying overnight in Lake Oswego at the Hilton Garden Inn.

I drove primarily at night in order to travel more quickly, with fewer stops.  My puppies were able to sleep at night during our travel, and the trip was easier on them with this schedule.

I filled up the car with gas in California, close to Shasta Lake, last night.  My attempt to refill my car was denied twice at one gas station and once at another.  (The fourth try worked.)  One pump listed on the viewscreen, "Please wait while we determine your security status," or something quite similar.  I have never seen such a statement before, though I have once -- during the last two weeks -- been denied the ability to refill my car through yet another non-functioning pump that was listed as being in full working order.

I need to observe that, for a woman alone to be refused gas for her car in the middle of a rural area at night represents a serious safety risk.

There were two cars at the Shasta gas station last night, one of which was a white van whose driver approached me when the other vehicle left.  The driver stated, apropo of nothing, that I looked "lost" and "out of place" before asking whether I needed assistance.

I told him "No.  I'm fine."

His assertions seemed plainly scripted, consistent with an intention to falsely report that I was in distress in some manner.

The real risk was, ironically, caused by the stranger approaching me at the behest of Txx Lxxxx' FBI cohort in the middle of the night.

Today, I unloaded my car of my suitcases and belongings only to have two gardeners immediately appear at 55 Vista Verde Way, raking leaves that were not in urgent need of disposal.

Meanwhile, two women, allegedly Jehovah's Witnesses, spoke together at the top of my driveway for at least twenty minutes, doing nothing.

Eventually, they descended my driveway, at which point I courteously explained that I was just returning from six months of travel and was unable to speak with them.

They appeared to seek permission to return, but I will not be conversing with these individuals for two reasons.  First, Jehovah's Witnesses have a history of being extremely intolerant of Americans with other faiths, and I feel this stance is unconstitutional.  Second, I do not believe it is appropriate for any people of faith to be paid to file false witness statements about others.

For your full information, I left Canada to return to the United States at this time, because there appeared to be the placement of a child's belonging within my hotel suite without my knowledge or consent, a circumstance I immediately reported to hotel management and one I consider to be particularly indefensible for its possible implications regarding knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

In addition, demands for false witness statements from hotel staff and guests appeared to be escalating.

Having said that, I am profoundly grateful to Canada for its welcome over the past six months.  Many Canadians approached this case with the highest ethics, and I appreciate their honor, their integrity and their commitment in doing so.

Canada, as close ally of the United States, shares our interest in ensuring that the long term human rights of their people are honored and upheld in every regard.

This is to confirm that all of my conduct while traveling, as at all other times, was lawful and honorable, reflecting the highest character and integrity, as always.

This is also to confirm that my puppies did not interact with others during our travel, except perhaps to bark from the back seat during a drive-through at McDonald's, or while parked at a rest stop.

I was able to clean up after them thoroughly within our hotel room in Lake Oswego, and our room was left in clean and serviceable condition, without damage.

I have no means of verifying whether the FBI initiated a fake 911 call from my room during our stay, but this allegation was extended to me.  To verify, I made no 911 call, nor did I send any messages or texts indicating distress or a need for emergency services.

One man at a rest stop appeared to attempt to approach us with his Dachsund, but because the rest stop was relatively dark, with poor lighting, I guided my dogs back to our car immediately.

During rest stops, I called my husband in order to enhance our safety and security, speaking to him throughout our time in public.

Because I elected not to leave my dogs alone during our trip, due to the fact that my car has been broken into previously with my dogs inside, a Burger King server brought our meal to my car when it was ready.

All went smoothly in this instance, as one would expect.

I will close this account by expressing that it was with a sense of joy and celebration that I re-entered the United States.

The border official seemed to indicate that all was in order regarding my file, even though a work permit had been mailed to me from Canadian immigration without my having applied for one.

Allegedly, the FBI was attempting to cause harm to me on the basis of this documentation, because those with a work permit are required to demonstrate a successful job application within a limited time period.  Without this, a violent immigration raid apparently becomes possible.  I doubt that this work permit was legal, because I had never applied for it.  But it could have occasioned physical harm to me, nonetheless.

Why did I return to the United States with a sense of celebration and homecoming?  Because this country, committed to its freedom, fiercely independent, insistent on its good faith, supportive of  Constitutional rights, still stands as a beacon of human potential worldwide, one that must not be diminished.

Americans know that our long term liberty can only be preserved if the long term liberty of our families, our neighbors, our communities, is preserved alongside our own.

I stand by our future, and I am here to help make it.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

A Dispatch from the Front Lines of the FBI's False Information

 1.  It has been suggested to you that there has been approval of yet another plan by the CIA to cause a mass-casualty event or even a localized explosion at your hotel, and following this, to attempt to blame it on you or another innocent person.  May I have your thoughts, please?

Answer:  There has been an allegation that the FBI and its affiliates have been in communication with the hotel's insurance company, yes, as well as that the hotel is due for a major renovation in the near future.  So the CIA is apparently quite active at the hotel at this time.

My response to the suggestion that this plan has been approved?  Russia appears to be exerting inappropriate influence over the United States government at this time, and is directing others to act in a manner that is counter to the interests of the sovereignty of the United States.

2.  It is further alleged that a harmful chemical was disseminated in your hotel suite last night.  Do you know what it was?

Answer:  I woke up with a terrible headache, so the allegation may reflect a tangible harm, to be sure.  Usually, the FBI and its affiliates are working with noxious pesticides that cause DNA damage, and this represents a long list.  Most of these chemicals are banned from being used in intentional exposures, and we've signed onto all of those treaties internationally.  So, for the United States to be directing such a dissemination in Canada represents a stark violation of international law.

3.  What about the suggestion that Txx Lxxxx of the FBI is now attempting to blame your deceased father for the crimes he himself directed at your Cape Cod property.

Answer:  My father was a tremendously honorable person, kind to everyone, deeply courteous, concerned with the human rights of all.  He worked for the U.N. at one point in his illustrious career, and he had close scientific collaboration with renowned scientists from all over the world.  On his last day on this Earth, scientists were calling me from all over the world to tearfully extend goodbyes -- Japan, France, on and on.  My father was a noble, dignified, brilliant, and gifted person, who never hurt anyone.

The truth of his virtue needs to be upheld.

4.  What option does Txx Lxxxx have if he cannot blame your family members for the crimes he himself directed, including extensive sovereignty violations of your two sons?

Answer:  He needs to tell the truth about what he did, both to me and to the DOJ.  If the DOJ elects to forgive his appalling predations in this case, that is the DOJ's prerogative.  But outreach to me is required on an immediate basis, because Txx Lxxxx is still attempting to exculpate himself by engaging in knowingly false reporting concerning me here in Canada.

5.  What was the latest incident regarding his attempts in this regard?

Answer:  Yesterday, I found a child's broken hair band on the floor of my hotel suite.  I immediately reported it to the hotel and the OIG Hotline, but what if I had happened not to find this item?  I could easily have missed it, because my puppies have all kinds of chew toys on the floor.  One can only imagine the lies that could have accompanied the placement of this item within my hotel room.  A detail as small as this can immediately place my life at risk all because Txx Lxxxx has chosen not to disclose the truth of his conduct in this case.  That's wrong.  It was wrong yesterday, it's wrong today, and it will be wrong tomorrow.  This man needs to confess before he causes any further harm to innocents, including my family.

6.  Can the DoD stop demanding false witness statements from both of your sons, intended to falsely report on their childhoods?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Those orders must be withdrawn on an urgent basis.  And the corresponding health harms to both of my sons and MX, intended to coerce them, should be reversed right away.

7.  If you can provide your completed Trust to the OIG Hotline, will this have the effect of mitigating the threats to your lives you are currently experiencing?

Answer:  This may take me several days, but yes, I would certainly hope so.

8.  In the meantime, how are you going to address the threat of egregious harm to you and your dogs at the hotel?

Answer:  This remains to be seen, but I will be reporting actively about our circumstances.

9.  Who has the greatest ability to withdraw these threats to your physical safety at this time?

Answer:  I think President Trump and Vice President Vance have the ability to communicate to Pete Hegseth that the safety of my entire family should immediately be restored.

10.  You are currently staying at the Westin in Whistler, B.C.?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

11.  Please keep us up-to-date on your safety and security status, given these extraordinary circumstances.

Answer:  Thank you for your concern.  I will certainly do so.

12.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams