1. You attempted to place your Will in a safety deposit box at Chase Bank in Los Altos on Friday, along with querying five other banks. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
2. What happened, may I ask?
Answer: I learned that Chase Bank is closing all of its safety deposit boxes for all American consumers across the United States.
3. All safety deposit boxes are being closed by the largest bank in the United States for all Americans with banking needs?
Answer: Yes, that is what I was told.
4. Were you given any explanation for this extraordinary step?
Answer: Chase Bank can no longer guarantee the security of its safety deposit boxes for Americans.
5. Was Chase Bank able to refer you to any bank that could effectively guarantee the security of safety deposit box contents?
Answer: No, it was not.
6. Why not?
Answer: I came away with the strong impression that Chase Bank is the first financial institution of many to effect these closures, and that other banks will soon follow.
7. For what reason?
Answer: The logical conclusion is that safety deposit boxes depend upon the promise of the financial institution that the boxes are not being inappropriately invaded by third parties. Once the customer and the bank lose that surety, the model can no longer function.
8. Who would be invading Americans' safety deposit boxes as unwelcome third parties?
Answer: Who, indeed? Who would have enough information to know the contents of the boxes, the insurance of the contents, the health of those possessing title to the boxes, etc.? That's a lot of information to aggregate, and there are only a few institutions that could have gathered that documentation over time.
9. Would the FBI have the information?
Answer: It would, yes.
10. You have said previously that the FBI has taken control of U.S. banks in a manner that is of significant concern to you.
Answer: Yes. We have seen a wholesale change in the privacy policies of the banks, in the wire security guarantees of the banks, and now in the safety deposit box policies of the banks. So, I'm sure that Jamie Dimond and others have quite a story to tell.
11. Are we at a point where Americans will be keeping their valuables under their mattresses, as we saw during the Great Depression?
Answer: Not quite. But the banks are signaling a separation from the interests of the American consumer and saver, and this information is highly important for the public to understand.
The United States is over-indebted in U.S. dollar-denominated obligations, and our government will at some point seek to pay off those debts in dramatically devalued currency.
So we are going to see dramatic inflation over the next several years, and together with that, we are going to see instability in many financial markets and investment structures, including U.S. banks.
12. What should the American consumer do at this point?
Answer: American citizens need to diversify any savings they might possess by considering investments that do well during periods of high inflation. Certain commodities will hold value. And we know the President himself is supporting cryptocurrencies, so everyone needs to pay attention to that messaging, however they might independently choose to respond to it.
13. You're saying that inflation is no accident this time around, but rather intentional government policy?
Answer: That is exactly so.
14. There will be a financial crisis that is planned in detail?
Answer: There will, yes.
15. You have asked to see records relating to your case within the DOJ, but you have also been told that those records are at risk of being altered.
Answer: It's best for me to see records directly at this time without anticipating their contents. The FBI has disclosed to me the amount of awards extended in my name and identity, so I am expecting to see documentation that demonstrates fealty to those numbers.
16. There should be full disclosure to you?
Answer: Yes, there should be.
17. You don't necessarily believe that all aspects of your case can be rendered public. Is that fair to say?
Answer: Yes, it is. Not all aspects of this case can be rendered public at this time, due to complexities regarding various governmental initiatives. That said, there should be full disclosure to me regarding my own case, its adjudication, its awards, its detailed timeline to date.
18. In the meantime, you are wandering around while maintaining possession of your own Will, due to the fact that it could disappear from other locations that have traditionally been regarded as "secure."
Answer: Well, this is the reason I have published the Will online. My circumstances do not allow for the usual privacy measures regarding estate documentation. I have made clear to my sons and my husband that I hope to update my Will with the assistance of an attorney. But the latest draft of my Will, a holographic document that is properly prepared and executed in keeping with the laws of California, is dated December 11, 2025.
So right now, I look forward to direct engagement with an attorney who will obtain documents from the DOJ which convey full disclosure of this case to me up to the current date.
19. With full disclosure, will you consider that a confidential dialogue with your attorney has commenced?
Answer: I expect a confidential dialogue with my attorney from the very beginning, which is to say that I expect to have attorney/client privilege upheld, and I expect that my attorney will represent my interests over and above those of other parties, despite what may be remarkable influence extended by others.
It really will not work for members of the FBI to be sabotaging my communications with my attorney by perpetrating the usual slander and defamation that is the specialty of people like Txx Lxxxx. If this is allowed, the consequences for the perpetrators will be quite severe.
20. Who will prevent that slander from being repeated?
Answer: We will see. I don't think it is reasonable to expect the FBI to suddenly grow a conscience regarding the agency's wrongdoing in this matter. Txx Lxxxx is not a person who will be experiencing remorse, shame, regret or doubt about his crimes against my family. To the contrary, in the past he has demonstrated an unusual proclivity for aggression at the precise moment he should be apologizing. So, restraint is not within this person's toolbox. Is it possible that the DOJ could effectively cut off his communications with those attorneys who may assist me in the future? I think it is, and I think this step would be wise for everyone involved.
21. What about the threats of FBI affiliates to harm your whole family if you persist in your right to see the details of your case with full disclosure?
Answer: Of course, it's likely that Txx Lxxxx would like to see his career worries vanish through an act of violence. But I think he may be prevented from proceeding down that path, given the contents of my Will dated December 11, 2025.
22. You have expressed deep concern for the preservation of Americans' human rights in the long term.
Answer: That is correct. I have. And the reason for this is that we cannot allow the agencies to perpetrate human trafficking, falsified law enforcement reporting, and sovereignty violations -- all of these standing separate and apart from their mission and objectives -- if we hope that human rights will endure within the United States and among our allies over the long term. These activities have been hugely profitable for the FBI and its affiliates. But they are indelibly and irresponsibly wrong, and they will condemn all of us to a nation that is diminished beyond all recognition if we fail to counter them.
23. What do the American people need in their leadership in the long term?
Answer: In the long term, they will need the truth if their freedom is to be preserved in any meaningful form. That means that ultimately, someone will need to possess the courage to express to the public what our greatest challenges are and how we can solve them together. We have not yet begun that renewed alliance between governance and the governed, but this is the necessity on which all of our hopes as a nation rely.
24. Will we recognize the inflection points that will allow that renewed alliance to be formed?
Answer: This is a critical question, because those inflection points will not last long. We need to be ready for them by regarding the future with great wisdom, insight and preparation.
25. Do you feel that that preparation can commence at this time?
Answer: It must begin at this time, yes. The government is striving for consensus among its central leadership team regarding short term objectives, but regarding the longer term, more dialogue will be needed.
26. And not necessarily public dialogue at this moment?
Answer: No. Not necessarily.
27. Will you please update us regarding your family members' health, your pets' health, your own health, as you are able?
Answer: Of course, and I am grateful for your concern for us.
28. That you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment