1. It seems that your older son is being threatened with death by his handlers unless he falsely alleges that you are mentally ill or unstable, and thus unqualified to receive awards extended in your name through the U.S. DoJ and its affiliates. Is this your impression?
Answer: Yes, it is. My older son is allegedly being asked to sign false witness statements that dovetail with false witness statements from my younger son, and I'm sure that both sets of falsehoods are being thoroughly vetted by Txx Lxxxx, whose career within the FBI is now on the line due to his lies about me in the past.
2. Aren't you currently serving as Durable Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney for your older son?
Answer: Yes, I am.
3. So, isn't it the case that his agency is continuing to task him outside the bounds of the law, given that you, as his advocate, have disallowed his participation in all government programs?
Answer: Yes, his agency, working as FBI contractor in this case, is defying the law in continuing to harm him through ongoing participation in the Pxxxxxx Program and related initiatives.
4. To be clear, your older son possesses disability rights. Is that the case?
Answer: Yes, it is. And, for the record, the FBI has alleged that my younger son has been sufficiently harmed by Txx Lxxxx and his FBI cohort that he now qualifies for disability rights as well. However, I have not been allowed to see him or speak with him in order to make that assessment directly.
5. Does Txx Lxxxx fear prison at this point? Is this the reason that he is continuing to defame you and harm your children with wrongful demands?
Answer: I am not in a position to reflect on Txx Lxxxx' legal jeopardy, given his crimes against my family members and myself. However, I would expect that his career is at stake at the very least. Under these circumstances, he is becoming more aggressive, to be sure.
6. What can be done to counter his tactics?
Answer: Well, again, the FBI needs to disengage with all involvement in human trafficking and other methods of torture and coercion. My sons and MX should not have been harmed in this manner yesterday, nor on previous days. This conduct on the part of the agency needs to be viewed under the heading of human atrocities, and the whole of the nation needs to condemn the FBI's conduct in this area without equivocation or misgiving.
7. How would you evaluate your ability to prevent your older son's human trafficking yesterday?
Answer: I would describe it as zero influence. His handler told him to report to his apartment before noon yesterday, so my older son dove into a fake political argument and called an Uber.
8. How did you respond to his conduct?
Answer: I began to play some Bach in order to establish a calm and peaceful environment within my kitchen, and then I told him that I believed in his character and integrity, and that I supported his virtue and courage under difficult circumstances.
9. Yet he still left according to his handler's instructions?
Answer: Yes, he did. And right on time.
10. And shortly after that, was he trafficked again?
Answer: This is the allegation, yes.
11. Following his trafficking at the directive of his handler, did he engage in "training" for aggression of some kind?
Answer: I don't have knowledge of the training he has received through the Pxxxxxx Program, except to know that it has been deeply traumatizing.
12. Isn't it true that your older son received training yesterday regarding aggression against your own family members?
Answer: Again, that is beyond any information he has shared with me.
13. Is it your impression that the Pxxxxxx Program has engaged in weapons training with your older son?
Answer: It is, yes.
14. Why does this seem apparent to you?
Answer: Because my older son does not deny that he has discharged a firearm under his handlers' directives, and I would never have guided him in this activity in any way, shape or form. Beyond this, he scrupulously avoids holding knives in the kitchen when in proximity to my husband or myself. He won't take a letter opener in hand if I am nearby. And all of these are notable changes from his prior behavior.
15. Is your impression that he now knows how to wield a knife to cause great harm, specifically because of the training he has received through the Pxxxxxx Program at the directive of the FBI, including Txx Lxxxx?
Answer: Yes, it is.
16. And you have mentioned that your older son has been previously tasked with "cleaning" assignments, which are also traumatizing.
Answer: That is correct. In fact, my older son was withdrawn from programming at a local mental health organization in Palo Alto, called LxSxxxx, in order for him to participate in traumatizing training through the Pxxxxxx Program.
17. He was withdrawn from mental health counseling programs without your consent or that of your husband in order to receive violent training through an FBI program?
Answer: Yes, he was.
18. May I have your comments regarding this conduct on the part of Txx Lxxxx and the agency?
Answer: Obviously, there are no limits for Txx Lxxxx' conduct. The fact that my son was harmed in this manner, even after I explicitly disallowed his participation as his Durable Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney, and the fact that his participation in the Pxxxxxx Program is still occurring, both demonstrate that Txx Lxxxx and his FBI personnel exhibit no respect for the law or American families whatsoever.
19. What is Txx Lxxxx' objective in this case?
Answer: Simply to "win." My impression is that he would like to direct a violent incident inside my home and, no doubt the aftermath would include the loss of my older son's life as well, so as not to leave any loose ends. A Rob Reiner-style disaster.
20. You are referring to the fact that Rob Reiner and his wife were killed by their son after a political argument at a Christmas party?
Answer: Yes, I am.
21. Do those events seem unusual to you?
Answer: Rob Reiner had been quite outspoken in his political beliefs. The tragic events that took his life and that of his wife have all the earmarks of a staged event. The public political argument a short time before is just a little too neat, but this is the kind of thing the FBI does when it perpetrates assassination under the auspices of Pxxxxxx. So, yes, the sequence is unusual.
22. What are the odds of Pxxxxxx Program involvement in this tragedy?
Answer: I would put the odds at greater than seventy percent on the basis of the staging of the public political argument. The likelihood that that argument was scripted and that there was a handler guiding the public statements and the timing of those statements at a public event -- these are significant.
23. How could the truth of this matter come to light?
Answer: The son's attorney should ascertain whether there is a root canal with an unusual filler material in an upper back molar, and together with that dental procedure, the placement of a communications device that is typical procedure for Pxxxxxx Program participants. That would be the place to start.
24. If that could be established, what would the son's responsibility for these crimes be?
Answer: After determining the presence of communications with a handler, then you would need to delve into the whole realm of sovereignty violations. So, the record of "treatments" and "training" perpetrated toward him would need to be obtained and examined in full. Extensive sovereignty violations have the effect of completely removing an individual's capacity for self-determination, and I think this point is critical for us to understand.
25. You have emphasized human sovereignty as one of the most important factors determining the future sovereignty of the United States, and, indeed, of the freedom of mankind as a whole.
Answer: Yes, I have. Individual sovereignty and national sovereignty are inextricably linked, because any one person can have their sovereignty violated by many of these methods in question. Our military leadership can be affected. Our Congressional representatives can be affected. Our Supreme Court Justices can be affected. Our DOJ personnel can be affected. Our Executive Branch can be affected. There is no national sovereignty without a robust defense of individual sovereignty, and that's why these assaults on self-determination need to be strictly and unequivocally prohibited.
26. What is the personal impact of sovereignty violations when you view it in the context of your own family?
Answer: To watch someone you love be overtaken by sovereignty violations of the sort perpetrated by the Pxxxxx Program is to be witness to an overwhelming loss of our best qualities as human beings. Our courage, our boundaries, our decision-making, our priorities, our deepest human bonds -- all of these are determined by our individual identities, which we have labored over decades of experience to form and nurture and grow. So, in answer to your question, the personal impact of sovereignty violations in someone you love is devastating.
27. What is the potential for someone who has suffered extensive sovereignty violations to recover their free will in its entirety?
Answer: This is unknown to me. The FBI appears to claim that recovery is possible. I simply have not seen that claim borne out in anyone who has been profoundly impacted by these human rights crimes.
28. How would you assess your own sovereignty at this time?
Answer: It's an irony that, in such a youth oriented culture, people over the age of fifty are less vulnerable to sovereignty violations. We've simply had more time to strengthen and reinforce our identities, our values, and our decision-making. All of which is to say that I'm currently doing well.
29. Do you consider yourself to be lucid and rational in your perspectives about yourself and the wider world?
Answer: I do.
30. Yet you would still insist that all sovereignty violations against your family members and yourself be immediately and permanently withdrawn?
Answer: As a top priority. Yes.
31. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment