My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Thursday, April 3, 2025

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 3, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com,.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,





Lane MacWilliams




Wednesday, April 2, 2025

FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF LACK OF ALL CONFIDENTIALITY REQUESTS FROM THE FBI

Federal Bureau of Investigation:

You and your affiliates have engaged in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against my family and myself in a case which you decisively lost before the Supreme Court.

FOIA reports and investigative reports are now due to me on an immediate basis.

Your ongoing efforts, through the effects of torture and individual sovereignty violations, to task my two sons with human trafficking assignments, assassinations, animal cruelty, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, terrorism-affiliated crimes, and espionage-related crimes condemn every aspect of your failed agency's corruption and predation.

Your ongoing attempts to impugn the high character of my husband and myself are equally reprehensible.

I requested outreach regarding my case by today, April 2, 2025, explaining that in the absence of any communication from the FBI or its representative by this date, the agency would be communicating to me that it possessed no confidentiality concerns whatsoever regarding my case.

The OIG Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice and the ODNI are said to have awarded more than 8 trillion dollars in my name regarding the FBI's crimes, yet I have not been formally notified of any of those awards.

Instead, the FBI has continued to attempt to take my life and those of my family members through plans of first-degree murder against its betters.

To ensure that the FBI and its affiliates are fully apprised of my understandable assumption, given its unexplained silence in the face of my repeated requests for communication, that the agency has no confidentiality needs regarding this matter, I am publishing this letter publicly, as well as sending a copy to the FBI's FOIA Office, with a copy to the OIG Hotline.

I will grant the FBI until 5:00 PM East Coast time on April 3, 2025 to engage in outreach if the agency possesses any requests for confidentiality regarding my case which it would like to communicate.

My email and phone number are known by the OIG Hotline, which has been investigating this matter on an ongoing basis.

Sincerely,




Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 2, 2025

OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com,.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,





Lane MacWilliams




Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Outreach

1. You do not recommend that PG&E cut your power tomorrow.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct.  Such an action would be highly inadvisable.

2.  May I ask why?

Answer:  I have sufficient information about PG&E's predations toward my family and my properties specifically that any further aggression whatsoever will be taken as overt, unjustifiable hostility that will require a response involving public exposure of this agency's crimes and many other details of the FBI's criminal predation toward my family.

3.  Would an exception be presented by outreach to you by tomorrow, which you have requested?

Answer:  Outreach will not occur tomorrow if the power is cut.  So, for there to be a power outage on the day of a deadline for outreach -- this would represent an unfortunate signal toward escalation of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and attendant harms.

And that is simply unacceptable to me.

4.  What do you mean by unacceptable?

Answer:  If I do not receive outreach by tomorrow, I will be formally expressing to the FBI that the agency has, in failing to engage in honorable outreach, communicated that it has no confidentiality concerns regarding any aspect of my case whatsoever.

5.  So, if you do not receive honorable outreach by tomorrow, the FBI will be giving you permission to discuss all of its crimes against you publicly.  

Answer:  It most certainly will.

6.  Do you believe that any aspect of your case may be considered confidential by the FBI or any of its affiliates?

Answer:  I don't have any idea.  I'm a civilian.  That's why I have repeatedly asked for honorable outreach concerning this matter -- so that appropriate, peaceable communication can take place that includes any and all expression of confidentiality concerns that could possibly exist.  

Any viable federal law enforcement agency would respond to such a request with professional and peaceable outreach.  In that absence of that, it is reasonable to assume that there are no confidentiality concerns on the part of the FBI or any of its affiliates pertaining to this case.

7.  Will you please let us know if you experience a power outage tomorrow?  

Answer:  I may not be able to do so in real time due to the impediments to communication, but yes, I will post on my blog as soon as I am able to do so.

8.  The FBI appears to be suggesting that it has coerced one or both of your sons into providing knowingly false witness statements intended to wrongfully justify a raid on your household tomorrow, during a power outage inappropriately facilitated by PG&E.  Is that your understanding?

Answer:  The FBI appears to be making this suggestion, yes.

9.  What is your perspective regarding this threat?

Answer:  The FBI needs to find another line of work.  This cycle of torture, coerced false witness statements, and threatened law enforcement raids is a dystopian system that needs to be retired completely.

10.  What do you think about the FBI's renewed threats of conveying tuberculosis, HIV, and many other acute illnesses to your family members or to you yourself, in addition to the threats of cancer, car accident, arson, wildfire, staged plane accident, intentional brain damage, kidnapping, arrest, predation toward your pets, and countless other harms?

Answer:  Again, these standard operating procedures on the part of the FBI simply need to be shelved.  They're deeply wrong from an ethical perspective.  No worthy court of law is going to uphold such harms, knowing that they are based on false witness statements extracted under torture.

11.  Does President Trump hold the power to pull the FBI into line?

Answer:  This has been the hope.

12.  Has that hope materialized?

Answer:  I do not yet have outreach, but I hope it will be soon forthcoming.

13.  Outreach would tell you what?

Answer:  That President Trump is running the country as an effective and conscientious chief executive who is not going to tolerate an FBI that trafficks, tortures and preys upon our youth and others in a manner that stands completely separate and apart from mission and objectives.

14.  And the lack of outreach would tell you what?

Answer:  That organized crime has taken over, with the FBI and the CIA as its chief representatives, often advancing the interests of the foreign adversaries of the United States.

15.  Will you be writing more about this if there is no honorable outreach extended to you by the end of the business day tomorrow?

Answer:  Much more.

16.  Specifically because the FBI will be communicating that it has no confidentiality concerns regarding your case whatsoever?

Answer:  Exactly so.

17.  You are not willing to suffer additional health harms to your family members, your pets or you yourself perpetrated by a wayward FBI or by anyone.  

Answer:  No, I am not.

18.  And you are no longer willing to wear a gas mask in your own home, check for radon gas constantly, measure ionizing radiation "hotspots," be constantly on guard for infectious disease caused by both environmental and non-conventional vectors.

Answer:  No, I am not.

19.  You traveled to Washington, D.C. in order to make yourself available to the DOJ and to facilitate the conveyance of FOIA and investigative reports due to you, in addition to traveling to Cape Cod and then back home, communicating honorably to District Attorneys, police departments and sheriff's offices all the while.  So, you now feel done with law enforcement corruption.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  When law enforcement does not accept your open invitation to an honorable conversation, there is no truthful law enforcement reporting going on.  It's all a sham, and those perpetrating it know perfectly well it's a sham.  By offering to assist them in their work by speaking to them directly, I simply called their bluff.  These people had nothing to say.  Zero.  And that says it all.

20.  They're lying.

Answer:  They're lying, and they've been lying the whole time.  And those lies are being utilized to hurt the best Americans we have.  

So, once again, we're facing a problem with law enforcement corruption in which law enforcement personnel are doing the bidding of our foreign adversaries who want to see us weak, disorganized, confused, sick, dying, impoverished and undone as a nation.

21.  You want more for us.

Answer:  Yes, I do.  I expect more for the United States and that means that outreach needs to occur regarding this matter, and it needs to occur right away.

22.  Please keep us updated with regard to the simple question of whether PG&E cuts your power tomorrow.

Answer:  I will do my best.

23.  If an attorney contacts you, will you be updating us?

Answer:  An attorney may request confidentiality during discussion, and I would be inclined to honor that request.

24.  For what reason?

Answer:  If someone is engaging in outreach in good faith, it's appropriate to converse with them with an understanding of their concerns.

25.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.





Lane MacWilliams


Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 1, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including, but not limited to, those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,





Lane MacWilliams





Saturday, March 29, 2025

Crimes Against Human Sovereignty By the FBI

1.  What is it like to have your older son unlawfully tasked with "cleaning" assignments or worse by his corrupt handler within the CIA?

Answer:  To be clear, the CIA is acting as an FBI contractor in this case, because the CIA only forcibly recruited my older son at FBI initiative.

But in answer to your question, the experience is horrific and stands in direct repudiation of all human decency and societal virtue.

2.  Your son has a disability which, through your Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney, has invalidated his prior agreements with the CIA.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

3.  Even so, his handler continues to unlawfully task him by threatening his life.  Isn't that so?

Answer:  Yes.

4.  And the threats to his life are not empty.  Rather they have involved the CIA's communication to your son of deadly disease, which his handler refused to treat unless your son follows his handler's directives.  Isn't that accurate?

Answer:  It is accurate.

5.  What wrongful acts did your son's handler direct him to perpetrate last night?

Answer:  I honestly don't know.  This could have constituted a "cleaning" assignment, though the FBI alleges that he was forced to perpetrate harm of some kind.

6.  What is a "cleaning assignment"?

Answer:  It is the forced desecration of a human corpse through dismemberment following a first-degree murder committed by the FBI or its affiliates.  And I'm sure it involves an attempt to erase evidence that a violent crime has been committed.

7.  When your son's handler has forced him to perpetrate harm in the past, what has that harm consisted of?  Torture?  Rape?  Murder?

Answer:  I don't know.  What I can say is that my son has lost his sovereignty as a direct result of the FBI's crimes against him and against our family. So his handler could direct him to do anything and he would be unable to refuse.

8.  What methods are utilized in stealing the sovereignty of an American citizen?

Answer:  In my older son's case, torture, rape, trafficking, and the conveyance of deadly disease have all been utilized, in addition to numerous other "methods" routinely used by the FBI as mechanisms of control over targeted members of the American public.

9.  You have recently disclosed that the FBI is heavily involved in the trafficking of American citizens.  Is the agency attempting to discredit your family as a result?  Is this why your son was given a wrongful directive by his handler last night?

Answer:  Honestly, it seems to be about discrediting my family, yes.  But I think the larger objective is to attempt to extract false witness statements from my older son that would allow a wrongful law enforcement raid on our home.

10.  With a violent intent?

Answer:  Yes, with a violent intent.

11.  And is the plan oriented toward the misappropriation of funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI?

Answer:  It appears to be, yes.

12.  So, really, this is about greed.  Avarice.

Answer:  I believe that greed is the driving force behind these crimes against my family -- this insatiable hunger for money.

13.  Who is participating in these crimes against your family as perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates at this time?

Answer:  This is an important question, certainly.  Who knows about them?  Who is authorizing them?  Who is seeking to profit from them?

14.  The FBI has routinely threatened, having stolen your son's sovereignty, to direct him to commit public harm toward innocents, has it not?

Answer:  Yes, it has.

15.  Do you think the FBI, through its experiments with sovereignty violations, is responsible for a certain percentage of mass shootings in the public sphere?

Answer:  This is occurring, without doubt.  The question is to what degree.  Is the FBI responsible for fifty percent of mass shootings in the United States?  Eighty percent?  Ninety?  There is direct culpability for the agency in a majority of these crimes.

Again, I am not disclosing here the full range of methods the FBI is utilizing in sovereignty violations.  But the tools are extensive, and when I say sovereignty violations, I am really talking about a total usurpation of independent human will.

16.  A total overthrow of the individual's ability to make his or her own decisions?

Answer:  Complete.  Yes.  There are no vestiges left of the individual's capacity to reject wrongful directives from his handler.  

17.  What is it like to witness these violations perpetrated by the FBI against your own children?

Answer:  What is the scariest horror film you have ever seen?  Multiply it by one thousand.

18.  You have said that all of your efforts to invest your sons with an unshakeable ethical framework, guiding principles, and a moral reference frame to aid them in decision-making throughout life have been effectively erased by a predatory FBI in an astonishingly short period of time.

Answer:  The loss of sovereignty makes no exceptions for the children of those of us who were excellent, attentive and loving parents.  All of that human investment in raising wonderful young men and women is simply wiped out by these predatory and inhuman stratagems of sovereignty violation being deployed by the FBI.

19.  If this matter is not illuminated further, how do you evaluate the future freedoms of Americans as a whole?

Answer:  They are utterly forfeit.

If this nation cannot muster the will to care about my children, it will care about no one's children.

The FBI's sovereignty violations make a mockery of the Constitution, and the agency knows it well.

So without proper accountability in this case, there can be no future freedoms, and we cannot expect we will have another chance to rescue them.

20.  Why not?

Answer:  There's already a tremendous knowledge gap between the public's awareness of tools being wielded by the FBI and the FBI's active deployment of those modalities, and this chasm is rapidly expanding.  There will not come a future time in which we can pause to consider the effects of the FBI's virtual enslavement and exploitation of the public through the co-opting of the human will.  That moment is now, not later.

21.  Should the communications devices of the FBI and its affiliates have been removed from your sons and MX the moment it was determined that sovereignty violations were occurring?

Answer:  That very instant, yes.

22.  And did you request this?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  I requested it endlessly.

23.  Yet those communications devices are still in place?

Answer:  Yes, they are.

24.  Is this a failure of the DOJ?  Is this a failure of a judicial process?  Why were those communications devices not removed?

Answer:  These are important questions, and their answers deserve our full attention as a nation.

25.  Can't your sons' handlers be stopped?  Can't the White House forcefully direct them to stop?

Answer:  Again, these are critical questions, and I'm glad you're giving voice to them.

26.  The FBI has also recently conveyed serious illness to you and to your pets.  It's not only your sons who are experiencing the terrible harms the agency is now wielding against you.

Answer:  That's true.

27.  Is this also because you revealed that the FBI is responsible for human trafficking crimes within the United States?

Answer:  I think the agency has been shamed by the human trafficking revelations, and I also think they have been shamed over their treasonous betrayals of American athletes on the world stage.

28.  Do you believe that the exacerbation of harm against your family has been the result of planning by both national and international participants?

Answer:  I do.  There is likely an intent to raid the coffers of the U.S. Treasury in a manner that transcends our borders.

29.  And you have still not been formally informed about funds awarded in your name?

Answer:  No, I have not.

30.  What needs to happen next?

Answer:  Leadership needs to happen next.  I will appreciate outreach on an immediate basis, along with a full investigation of the recent harms of my sons and MX.

31.  In the meantime, you are allowing the publication of your recent texts to your older son, below, in order to illuminate a portion of the impact of the FBI's crimes against your family.

Answer:  Yes, I am.  Keep in mind that I extend these exhortations to him even knowing he has lost his sovereignty.  It's like speaking a prayer to a person in a coma.  He cannot respond.  He cannot save himself.  But in the future, he may remember that I was advocating for him, and this may help him in some manner yet to be elucidated.

32.  You do not believe your words alone can overcome the FBI's sovereignty violations toward your sons and MX.

Answer:  Absolutely not.

33.  Can their sovereignty be returned to them?

Answer:  If we are a worthy nation, we will insist on finding out.

34.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.





Lane MacWilliams






Monday, March 24, 2025

Nowhere On Earth

 1.  Who would have sold out the USA gymnasts through paying Larry Nassar as an FBI informant running "background checks" while he was abusing those virtuous girls and young women who were representing our nation?

Answer:  Obviously, that initiative originated with an adversary of the United States, someone who felt that it was satisfying to harm those formally representing the United States at the highest level in athletic competition, and particularly in the realm of gymnastics.  I would expect that the originator of those acts represented a nation that competes with the U.S. internationally in women's gymnastics competitions -- a nation that believes that, were the USA gymnasts incapacitated, they might be dominant.

2.  You're talking about Russia or China.

Answer:  Russia and/or China would represent reasonably deduced answers here.  I think the American people deserve to know where these directives originated, who within the FBI was paid to advance them, and further, what other teams may be suffering from harm in various manifestations due to similarly competitive initiatives.

For example, it was documented that the U.S. men's swimming team during the Paris Olympics appeared to be intentionally undermined by an improper training schedule immediately before critical team competitions.

3.  The men on the U.S. swim team apparently felt betrayed by what transpired, I understand.

Answer:  Yes, they did.

So, we would want to know what happened there.  The FBI or FBI affiliates were likely pressuring the coaches with threats and bribes, and so we would want to illuminate these events and fully understand their origin.

4.  Who won the men's 4 x 100 relay in swimming at the Paris Olympics?

Answer:  China.

5.  Because the United States is is normally dominant in this event.

Answer:  Without question.

6.  Some of the Chinese swimmers had earlier tested positive for a banned substance that was ruled to be the result of unexplained contamination within a restaurant.

Answer:  This was reported, yes.

7.  What is going on here?

Answer:  The United States is experiencing fundamental problems with sovereignty due to the corruption of the FBI and FBI-affiliated agencies, and the world-class U.S. athletes who are some of the most visible and dominant representatives of U.S. competition on the global stage are paying a high price.  That's what's going on.

8.  How critical is it that the FBI's crimes against the American public in the realm of human trafficking be illuminated at this juncture?

Answer:  How critical is the future of the American people?  Those questions are one and the same.

9.  You feel righteous indignation over this issue.

Answer:  Every American is going to feel righteous indignation over this issue.  The human trafficking crimes of the FBI and its affiliates represent such a fundamental assault on our nation's families and communities -- and such a profound betrayal of everything the FBI is meant to stand for in defending the nation -- that righteous indignation is the least of the feelings the public is going to bring to this matter.

10.  Did the FBI offer to remodel your home on Cape Cod if you kept quiet about this?

Answer:  That appeared to be something the agency was suggesting, albeit indirectly.

11.  What is your response to that suggestion?

Answer:  Do I seem like the type of person who would sell out America's children in return for a remodeled house?

12.  No, you don't.

Answer:  Thank you very much.

13.  What needs to happen regarding this matter?

Answer:  We need to understand who is paying off the FBI to undermine the nation, and we need to comprehend whether those payments are also being directed to key figures within the United States' military and within other spheres as well.

14.  What will happen if we don't?

Answer:  Adversarial nations will continue to cause the American public appalling harms in the realm of human trafficking and other realms having nothing whatsoever to do with our nation's goals, and the FBI will continue to help them.

15.  Has the FBI acted in treasonous ways toward the American public pertaining to human trafficking?

Answer:  I believe the FBI has done so, yes.  And I also suspect that FBI affiliates have acted in treasonous ways when in comes to drug trafficking that has harmed countless American citizens.

Again, neither human trafficking nor drug trafficking have anything whatsoever to do with the mission and objectives of the FBI or its affiliate agencies.  This is important to keep in mind.

16.  Human trafficking and drug trafficking do not meet any national objectives of the FBI, whether concealed or overt.   Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct.

However, these are highly lucrative "businesses" that are controlled by organized crime figures within the United States and elsewhere, and those funds are being funneled to certain key figures within the FBI and elsewhere, without doubt.

The American public can be disabled by human trafficking and drug trafficking crimes perpetrated by the FBI, with a portion of Americans losing their lives over these forms of enslavement.

And with a disabled public, the interests of our foreign adversaries are greatly advanced.

17.  You want outreach concerning these crimes against your family, and you want outreach concerning these crimes against our nation.  Is that true?

Answer:  Oh, yes.

18.  Isn't the FBI continuing to engage in knowingly falsified reporting against your family?

Answer:  I would say that the knowingly falsified reporting by the FBI has accelerated, not abated, over recent days.

19.  What are the reasons for this?

Answer:  Obviously, the FBI is attempting to avoid accountability with regard to its own predation toward the American public in the realm of human trafficking.  So, there is an exacerbation of falsified law enforcement information concerning my family and myself.

20.  Isn't it likely that the FBI was offering to remodel your house on Cape Cod only to claim that you accepted those improvements as a bribe from Russia or China for malfeasance of which you and and your husband know nothing whatsoever?

Answer:  This would be a typical pattern for the agency.  The FBI appears incapable of acknowledging its own guilt.  Instead, it projects all of its own crimes onto its victims.  This is an institutional culture, deeply ingrained, and it represents a terrible flaw within the organization and a pressing problem for the nation as a whole.

21.  Is the FBI, having betrayed the national interest through human trafficking crimes toward the American people, still worthy of the public trust?

Answer:  Let's ask the American public that question, and let's be certain they know all the facts as they decide upon their answer.

22.  You have said that the American public is a sleeping giant.

Answer:  The giant is not always asleep, and no one should be counting on the giant's indefinite slumber regarding this issue.

23.  You want outreach regarding your case on an immediate basis, and you want outreach regarding the human trafficking crimes against the American public as a whole.  Is that right?

Answer:  I don't know how many times I have to say this.  Yes.  Lawful and honorable outreach is necessary at this time.

24.  Is there a greater or more determined love than that you feel for America's children?

Answer:  Nowhere on earth.

25.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.





Lane MacWilliams