OIG Hotline, please consider this document part of my Statement of Appeal, to be added to my prior Statement of Appeal, only if necessary and appropriate given current rulings.
I ask that my advocates place a priority at all times on upholding all Orders of Injunctive Relief extended by the Supreme Court in my favor.
In no case should an Order of Injunctive Relief extended by the Supreme Court in my favor be appealed.
I regret that I do not currently have the benefit of direct communication with legal counsel. The upholding of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 on an immediate basis will solve this intractable problem.
The FBI appears to allege that the CIA has argued before a Supreme Court Justice today that my life should be taken due to alleged disclosure of confidential information in a confidential email, sent and received within my own email account, lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, yesterday.
If true, I would respectfully request that any such Justice's ruling be immediately appealed.
I did not disclose confidential information publicly, even though some might argue that, because the agencies have never extended the appropriate communications to disclose to me what they consider to be confidential information, despite my repeated requests, I cannot be considered to be bound to unknown restrictions.
I have not publicly divulged the techniques of those who have assailed my family members and myself. I have written thoughtfully about them in an email to myself, with a subject line to attention of the OIG Hotline. Beyond this, I have labeled that email confidential in the subject line and through a detailed confidentiality notice embedded within the content itself.
I did not place the information on my blog, on my Facebook page, or on any other publicly accessible forum, even though lethal means were utilized against my family members and myself.
So, my response was restrained, measured, and responsible, while still allowing investigators to become aware of the fact that there has been an ethical breach that appears to have endangered many.
I believe every human being has a responsibility to let authorities know when such endangerment has occurred. When we know others are imperiled we must acknowledge the presence of the ethical mandate to inform someone in authority who can more thoroughly assess the violation of human rights.
Again, I did so through exceptionally private means.
While I have requested that outreach occur to me as soon as possible through the upholding of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, I would emphasize at this juncture that this has become an urgent petition due to the apparently repeated attempts of the FBI and its affiliates to justify egregious harm to my family members and/or myself.
The FBI has recently suggested that arson, wildfire, sniping, and other assaults recently delineated within my private email documentation could easily be utilized to cause lethal harm to my family members or myself.
For whatever reason, today, November 19, 2024, the FBI's threats appear to be targeting my older son and myself.
In both cases, I believe we have been knowingly mischaracterized by the agency as "dangerous," because this represents the fastest possible route for the FBI and its affiliates to wrongfully justify the taking of an innocent life.
Yet, the conflicts of interest are prodigious in this case.
The FBI is said to fear public hearings should President Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress determine that this is appropriate.
And now, certain of its personnel and affiliates may be implicated in planning extremely serious crimes against the law-abiding American public relating to a weekend event last Sunday, with concerns previously described for the OIG Hotline.
Please also allow me to observe that the FBI and its affiliates appear to have altered my Amazon "recommended for you" feed to include myriad books on the assassination of JFK and Martin Luther King, Jr. and to include books on all recent Presidents of the United States. I did not purchase these recommendations. I have never threatened anyone, much less a public official. And I never will.
I am a peaceable person, who believes wholeheartedly in the rule of law and civil discourse. As someone who has received hundreds of thousands of threats from the FBI over recent years, I understand the toll that threats take on a person attempting to live his or her life in peace and harmony. They are saddening, diminishing, disruptive, frightening, distracting, confusing and aggressive. The victim of such threats never knows which warnings to take most seriously, and which to ignore. So, he or she vacillates between hypervigilance on the one hand and sheer numbness to fear on the other.
For the FBI to mischaracterize me -- the recipient of a constant stream of death threats from the very agency that should have been protecting me from them -- as a person who would ever wish anyone to feel fear or distress, represents a devastating lie.
My whole life has been dedicated to attempting to help others, and it still is.
Fake messaging, fake emails, AI-generated audio recordings or video recordings in which I am seen or heard to be threatening harm to anyone are always going to be immediately perceivable as false by those who know my character.
Again, I always wish to protect and uplift others, not to cause them harm.
Recently, I have been critical of leaders who have withheld my FOIA report and investigative reports, even while they appear to have authorized others to attempt to take my life.
But I think that logical criticism is rational, and I think my peaceable objections are appropriate.
The Supreme Court seems to have agreed with me in issuing Injunctive Orders of Relief specifying that materials be provided to me on an immediate basis.
So, I would simply observe that, with the FBI's allegation that the CIA has now taken over the production of disinformation about me and about my family members as well, and with the agency's assertion that the AI systems of disinformation production within the CIA are much more advanced than those within the FBI, time is of the essence.
I am one person standing for the truth. The FBI has previously called itself "an army of liars." So there is no balance or equity in this circumstance, and there never can be balance or equity in pitting one honest whistleblower against AI's vast and relentless disinformation capabilities.
This is the reason that prior proven lies by the FBI must demonstrate the extent to which the FBI and CIA are fearful of exposure of their large programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public.
To say that these agencies possess conflict of interest regarding my case is a vast understatement.
AI will never develop the conscience necessary to tell the truth about virtuous Americans.
AI will never confess its duplicity, regret its manipulations, or lose sleep over its harms.
But its victims will, and its victims are.
Please assist me in reversing all judgements based on wrongful assertions about my character, my integrity, or my intent. I remain praiseworthy, dedicated to the wellbeing of those I know, and those I don't know, compassionate, benevolent, and peaceable in every way, shape and form.
I appreciate the thoughtful and dedicated engagement of my advocates regarding this issue.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
