OIG Hotline, please access the following communications sent to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com today, November 20, 2024.
Thank you very much for accessing these communications at your earliest opportunity.
Most gratefully,
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, please consider this document part of my Statement of Appeal, to be added to my prior Statement of Appeal, only if necessary and appropriate given current rulings.
I ask that my advocates place a priority at all times on upholding all Orders of Injunctive Relief extended by the Supreme Court in my favor.
In no case should an Order of Injunctive Relief extended by the Supreme Court in my favor be appealed.
I regret that I do not currently have the benefit of direct communication with legal counsel. The upholding of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 on an immediate basis will solve this intractable problem.
The FBI appears to allege that the CIA has argued before a Supreme Court Justice today that my life should be taken due to alleged disclosure of confidential information in a confidential email, sent and received within my own email account, lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, yesterday.
If true, I would respectfully request that any such Justice's ruling be immediately appealed.
I did not disclose confidential information publicly, even though some might argue that, because the agencies have never extended the appropriate communications to disclose to me what they consider to be confidential information, despite my repeated requests, I cannot be considered to be bound to unknown restrictions.
I have not publicly divulged the techniques of those who have assailed my family members and myself. I have written thoughtfully about them in an email to myself, with a subject line to attention of the OIG Hotline. Beyond this, I have labeled that email confidential in the subject line and through a detailed confidentiality notice embedded within the content itself.
I did not place the information on my blog, on my Facebook page, or on any other publicly accessible forum, even though lethal means were utilized against my family members and myself.
So, my response was restrained, measured, and responsible, while still allowing investigators to become aware of the fact that there has been an ethical breach that appears to have endangered many.
I believe every human being has a responsibility to let authorities know when such endangerment has occurred. When we know others are imperiled we must acknowledge the presence of the ethical mandate to inform someone in authority who can more thoroughly assess the violation of human rights.
Again, I did so through exceptionally private means.
While I have requested that outreach occur to me as soon as possible through the upholding of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, I would emphasize at this juncture that this has become an urgent petition due to the apparently repeated attempts of the FBI and its affiliates to justify egregious harm to my family members and/or myself.
The FBI has recently suggested that arson, wildfire, sniping, and other assaults recently delineated within my private email documentation could easily be utilized to cause lethal harm to my family members or myself.
For whatever reason, today, November 19, 2024, the FBI's threats appear to be targeting my older son and myself.
In both cases, I believe we have been knowingly mischaracterized by the agency as "dangerous," because this represents the fastest possible route for the FBI and its affiliates to wrongfully justify the taking of an innocent life.
Yet, the conflicts of interest are prodigious in this case.
The FBI is said to fear public hearings should President Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress determine that this is appropriate.
And now, certain of its personnel and affiliates may be implicated in planning extremely serious crimes against the law-abiding American public relating to a weekend event last Sunday, with concerns previously described for the OIG Hotline.
Please also allow me to observe that the FBI and its affiliates appear to have altered my Amazon "recommended for you" feed to include myriad books on the assassination of JFK and Martin Luther King, Jr. and to include books on all recent Presidents of the United States. I did not purchase these recommendations. I have never threatened anyone, much less a public official. And I never will.
I am a peaceable person, who believes wholeheartedly in the rule of law and civil discourse. As someone who has received hundreds of thousands of threats from the FBI over recent years, I understand the toll that threats take on a person attempting to live his or her life in peace and harmony. They are saddening, diminishing, disruptive, frightening, distracting, confusing and aggressive. The victim of such threats never knows which warnings to take most seriously, and which to ignore. So, he or she vacillates between hypervigilance on the one hand and sheer numbness to fear on the other.
For the FBI to mischaracterize me -- the recipient of a constant stream of death threats from the very agency that should have been protecting me from them -- as a person who would ever wish anyone to feel fear or distress, represents a devastating lie.
My whole life has been dedicated to attempting to help others, and it still is.
Fake messaging, fake emails, AI-generated audio recordings or video recordings in which I am seen or heard to be threatening harm to anyone are always going to be immediately perceivable as false by those who know my character.
Again, I always wish to protect and uplift others, not to cause them harm.
Recently, I have been critical of leaders who have withheld my FOIA report and investigative reports, even while they appear to have authorized others to attempt to take my life.
But I think that logical criticism is rational, and I think my peaceable objections are appropriate.
The Supreme Court seems to have agreed with me in issuing Injunctive Orders of Relief specifying that materials be provided to me on an immediate basis.
So, I would simply observe that, with the FBI's allegation that the CIA has now taken over the production of disinformation about me and about my family members as well, and with the agency's assertion that the AI systems of disinformation production within the CIA are much more advanced than those within the FBI, time is of the essence.
I am one person standing for the truth. The FBI has previously called itself "an army of liars." So there is no balance or equity in this circumstance, and there never can be balance or equity in pitting one honest whistleblower against AI's vast and relentless disinformation capabilities.
This is the reason that prior proven lies by the FBI must demonstrate the extent to which the FBI and CIA are fearful of exposure of their large programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public.
To say that these agencies possess conflict of interest regarding my case is a vast understatement.
AI will never develop the conscience necessary to tell the truth about virtuous Americans.
AI will never confess its duplicity, regret its manipulations, or lose sleep over its harms.
But its victims will, and its victims are.
Please assist me in reversing all judgements based on wrongful assertions about my character, my integrity, or my intent. I remain praiseworthy, dedicated to the wellbeing of those I know, and those I don't know, compassionate, benevolent, and peaceable in every way, shape and form.
I appreciate the thoughtful and dedicated engagement of my advocates regarding this issue.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, over the last several days, the FBI has appeared to allege that the daughters of my childhood minister -- Liz Herzog and Jenny Hoffman -- have been forced by the DoD to file knowingly falsified witness statements. Whether my minister friends, Chuck Hoffman and Ellendale McCallum Hoffman, have been forced to do the same, I don't know. The FBI has previously alleged that Peg Remsen may have been forced to do so, and potentially her husband Tony Remsen. All of these people, along with David Remsen, are part of the same family -- one to whom my family was exceptionally close while I was growing up.
Having said that, I knew Jenny Hoffman and Tony Remsen the least. Jenny was the little sister of my best friend, and there was too large an age gap for us to play together (approximately 5-6 years). And Tony Remsen was ultimately my best friend's stepfather, though out-of-state. So, we never had occasion to converse, even when he resided in my hometown. We were always cordial, however.
Liz Herzog, Chuck Hoffman, Ellendale McCallum Hoffman, Peg Remsen, and David Remsen are my friends -- wonderful people, with substantive integrity, kindness, intelligence, faith and warmth. These are truly good people, and they would never lie except under extreme duress. (I daresay that Jenny Hoffman and Tony Remsen are no doubt just as praiseworthy.)
I know the FBI hates ministers and clergy, so the agency probably punished Chuck and Ellendale to inordinate degree -- a fact which our whole nation should find devastating. The FBI did the same thing to my local minister Matt McDermott, taking his long-standing parish away from him and putting in his place a minister it can allegedly easily control, word for word, in the pulpit and out.
This constituted a spiritual crime it is difficult to quantify. The Reverend Matt McDermott refused to lie about me for FBI Station Chief Tom Lyons, even when Tom Lyons told him "Join or die." Because of his faith, character and integrity regarding this case, the Reverend Matt McDermott lost his entire church community.
Further, the FBI alleges that, despite the agency's financial compensation to the Reverend Matt McDermott, he has remained on their "target of interest" list, and suggests that the FBI has placed his entire family (wife, children, grandchildren, and twin brother) on this list as well.
The FBI also appears to allege that it has added my minister friend Lori Walton to its "target of interest" list -- again, for no reason whatsoever.
I remain deeply worried about these friends, and all of my other friends, who are wonderful people of honesty and good character as well.
My minister friends hold a special place in my heart, mind and soul, and to know the manner in which the FBI despises, harasses, surveils, defames and harms them is something I find entirely heartbreaking.
One favorite trick the FBI deploys is to email the whole congregation of a faith community by impersonating the online identity of the pastor, minister, priest, rabbi or imam. The FBI falsely alleges via email that a beloved faith leader is in distress and needs money from the congregation, and asks them to send gift cards via return email message.
By that point, the faith community is in chaos, with follow up emails clarifying the ruse for everyone -- but not before substantive monies have been sent in the form of gift cards from generous church goers!
Then the FBI tallies up the haul, and adds to their "target of interest" list every generous person who sent a gift card by falsely stating that they are supporting terrorism. Somehow the FBI alleges that the ruse was organized by a terrorist (all too true, but in the form of the agency itself!), and proceeds to implicate and target every kind person who attempted to help his or her minister in an allegedly difficult circumstance.
And, good people of the OIG Hotline, the agency does this over and over and over again -- to ALL the churches, ALL the synagogues, ALL the mosques -- multiple times.
Faithful Americans have no idea what is going on. None whatsoever.
And I find this absolutely heartbreaking, as I have said.
We were founded as one nation under God. That doesn't mean we all worship in the same way, according to the same rituals, at the same times. Some of us choose not to worship at all. But I believe that our founding as one nation under God was a statement of commitment to kindness toward our fellow man, benevolence toward the vulnerable, generosity of spirit toward our neighbors, altruism toward our countrymen.
The idea that the FBI should now be treating faith communities as ripe targets for scamming in this manner, with all the follow-on harms that are subsequently perpetrated against people of good faith, represents an abandonment of the very principles that brought us together and kept us together as a nation in our search for freedom and justice for all.
Does the fact that the FBI has contempt for God mean that Americans of substantive faith are doomed to be victimized by this agency?
Perhaps the American people would have a rejoinder to this predicament that we should now hear.
And perhaps the FBI might consider that, if God Himself is not a myth, He might find the agency's attacks on houses of worship to be as deeply offensive as the worst malevolent predation toward the vulnerable the agency has ever perpetrated anywhere, at any time, toward anyone.
I know I do.
I would further point out that our Constitution provides for the separation of Church and State in the First Amendment, a critical right that the FBI is now flagrantly violating. By cynically labeling the most thoughtful churchgoers "supporters of terrorism," the FBI has systematically breached all bounds of decency requiring respect for the sanctity and sovereignty of houses of worship across the United States.
Should we really allow Tom Lyons to turn our churches into casinos for this corrupt agency and its cohort? To turn our congregants into persecuted "targets," watched and harmed by the government for the sole crime of worshipping God?
Or can we muster the force of will as faithful Americans to say no? Emphatically and unwaveringly, no.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, please reference my email communications forwarded to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com today, November 19, 2024.
Thank you for accessing these communications at your earliest possible opportunity.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
OIG Hotline, the following test is excerpted from an email sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, sent at 1:47 PM Pacific time today, November 18, 2024, updated at 2:02 PM. Please access the original communication at your earliest opportunity.
OIG Hotline, please accept my texts to my older son in their entirely up until 1;28 PM on November 18, 2024.
As you can see, all of my communication with my son -- as with everyone else -- remains lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form.
I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully, and categorically false.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
I will update your Office throughout the day if I engage in further communications with my older son, Because he seems to be under inordinate pressure at this time, I believe it will be important to keep you updated regularly.
I will simply add the following. I asked many times for my sons to be separated from their handlers, and for MX to be separated from hers as well. If htis has not yet been accomplished, I believe the leadership which originally approved of their recruitment as the sons of an FBI whistleblower, intended to cause harm through false reporting about our family, remains responsible for this failure.
My sons should still be separated from their handlers. Their health should still be restored to them. All further involvement in the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program should be strictly prohibited. They should be thoroughly interviewed. And they should be rendered free and clear from any and all other government initiatives.
My concern is that they could now be further harmed or lose their lives because the President is afraid of the witness statements they may later provide concerning his apparent decisions to prey upon my family for his own personal gain.
The FBI appears to allege this afternoon that my older son's name has been added by the President to a CIA black-budget contract to take his life. No doubt this applies to my younger son as well. And I would imagine the MX is similarly vulnerable.
Under these circumstances, it is clear that I need the Supreme Court to uphold FRCP 23 on an immediate basis. I would ask once again that this communication be prioritized.
Thank you very much for your support in this regard.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
P.S. -- Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that some threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time. I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation. Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms. As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.
OIG Hotline, please see a new communication sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, bearing the following subject heading and date/time stamp:
OIG Hotline, please access an email sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, bearing the following subject heading and date/time stamp.
