My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.

Thursday, September 29, 2022

Confirmation of Successful Transmission of 7-page Fax to OIG Hotline

I include herewith confirmation of successful transmission of a 7-page fax to the OIG Hotline today, September 29, 2022, beginning at 12:51 p.m. Pacific time to (202) 616-9881.  Note that the OIG Hotline is specifically designated as the recipient.

This fax included communications regarding DNA ,matching through younger brother of suspect; possible fax content tampering; documentation of apparent remote 911 dial by Pegasus-hacked cell phone.

 I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

Partial DNA Match for Biological Sample from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation

September 29, 2022

To the OIG Hotline Investigations Division:

It is likely that investigators can locate a partial DNA match for my stalker xxxxxxx xxxx by searching for the criminal record of his younger brother, who I am informed has been involved in drug offenses, likely in the state of New York.

While I do not have independent verification of this information, I believe it holds sufficient weight to pursue.

I hope this may assist your efforts.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*Postscript: For investigators' information, I do not believe there is any love lost between these brothers.  The younger brother apparently disclosed to xxxxxxx xxxx's hometown that he was HIV positive, thereby making him feel that he could not comfortably socialize in his hometown in the future.  There are apparently ongoing hard feelings about this unconsented disclosure.

Documentation of Apparent Remote 911-Dial By Pegasus-hacked Cell Phone

This is to document the fact that my cell phone (415) 963-1467, which has apparently sustained a Pegasus hack, appeared to place an emergency call to 911 without my initiative this morning at approximately 9:10 a.m.  Following this event, the phone appeared to be frozen, and it remains so at this time.

I called my husband from my landline (650) 851-1025 immediately following this event and requested that he call the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office dispatch to confirm that no emergency had transpired.  He did so, and called me back on our landline (650) 851-1081 to let me know that he had received reassurance from the SMC Sheriff's Office that law enforcement responders were not being dispatched to our residence.

Clearly, there are serious risks to safety in circumstances such as these, which appear to involve a Pegasus-hacked cell phone being controlled by a third party to effect an emergency dial connected to the residence of a law enforcement whistleblower.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Has the FBI Coordinated With Another Three-letter Agency Regarding Harm to a "Target of Interest"?

OIG Hotline, it is with reluctance that I convey the following threats to my family.

First, I am aware that the FBI and its affiliates have undertaken a concerted effort to discredit my truthful account of its engagement in falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-demcratic objectives.  Consequently, I feel hesitant to relate the full extent of threats I receive.  There are too many of them, frankly, and they are often too broad in scope to be meaningful.

Second, I am not in a position to assess the credibility of these threats.  Except to say that it appears the FBI has undertaken unlawful and repeated plans to cause harm to me as a whistleblower of agency malfeasance, I cannot realistically evaluate the seriousness of each threat I receive.  Clearly, the overall intent of these death threats is to render me fearful.  Yet, I am not a fearful person by nature, and I dislike the forced identity of a "victim," per se.  I see myself as a capable and resilient person, and I view my efforts to communicate with your Office as being dedicated to the many "targets of interest" who, despite their best efforts, have been unable to secure advocacy as of yet.

Having said that, something very significant has changed in my stalker xxxxxxx xxxx's communications through the Pegasus hack of my cell phone (xxx) xxx-1467.  He has repeatedly conveyed that he believes he will be incriminated by DNA evidence connected to a sample of some type provided to investigators by the Palo Alto Medical Foundation.  While he conveys that he himself is not in the "database," (I am not certain whether he is referring to a DNA "database"), he has communicated that his younger brother has committed minor drug offenses, and therefore, may prove a genetic link.

Yesterday, I received a series of communications from my stalker stating "Keep faith, even though you have no chance."  

He appeared to suggest coordination between the FBI and an alternate agency, the CIA, regarding predation toward my family.  It is noteworthy that the CIA mention is entirely new.  It has never been extended to me before.  I was unaware that the CIA ever worked domestically, but, based on a quick online search, it seems that the agency is capable of doing so if the FBI requests this assistance as the primary agency involved.  

Could the FBI's false allegations of "espionage" or "terrorism" occasion such coordination?

Again, this is not my area of expertise in any way, shape, or form.  

But I am concerned about a more concrete threat I have received involving a nighttime break-in perpetrated by armed contractors from a three-letter agency.  Thursday night was specified, and, as I said, the CIA was an entirely new assertion regarding this latest threatened assault.

Perhaps of greatest concern to me is the repeated recent appearance on my phone of the "Destroyer/Ecstasy" post, below.  My stalker seems to possess an unusual psychology, which may involve sadistic components, unfortunately.  In the past, the appearance of the "Destroyer/Ecstasy" material has corresponded to more serious attempts to cause us harm.

Out of an abundance of caution, I am forwarding these details to you.

On the chance the FBI may have coordinated with another agency to cause harm to me as an FBI whistleblower, or to my family, perhaps there is sufficient time and space in which to address this threat through formal channels.

I appreciate, as always, your efforts to protect the safety of my family and myself under these unusual circumstances.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

Monday, September 26, 2022

UPDATE: A Facebook Notification Regarding Access

 OIG Hotline investigators, I have re-established two-factor authentication on my Facebook account, as Meta requested of me, below, on September 21, 2022.

Please notify me if I can further assist your access to my account.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams


OIG Hotline investigators, I received the following notification from Facebook's parent company, Meta, this afternoon, appearing to indicate that I will be forced to reinstate two-factor authentication on my Facebook account by September 27, 2022.  

My Facebook account will remain accessible for the time being, but I will abide by this deadline.

Having said that, I hereby formally grant OIG Hotline investigators my full permission to access my Facebook account at any time they so desire.

I am sure that investigators are free to proceed of their own accord.  But if any other documentation should be required for the OIG Hotline Investigations Division to obtain full access to my Facebook account, please let me know.

I will be happy to provide whatever supporting attestation will assist.

I grant this permission to OIG Hotline Investigations Division of my own fee will and accord.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams


The following document is transcribed for ease of reading.

Email from: To:

Date:  September 21, 2022 at 1:43 p.m.

Re:  Secure your account to keep access

Hi Lane,

If someone compromises your Facebook account, they could take control of business assets like ad accounts, Pages, lines of credit or the Business Manager.

To continue managing Meta Business Accounts and assets, you'll need to turn on two-factor authentication by September 27, 2022.

Failure to turn on two-factor authentication will result in restricted access.

Two-factor authentication is when we ask for a verification code in addition to your password if we notice a login from an unrecognized device or browser.  This makes it harder for others to gain access to your account and take control of your business.

The FBI's Influence Over Moral Failures in Medical Care

 1. It seems that some people who have provided falsified witness statements about you to the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office and the FBI may have been instructed by your stalker and his affiliates to suggest that you were ill.

Answer:  If you mean ill with HIV, it has been suggested that my stalker may have arranged for this false reporting.  I do not know whether this transpired.  For the record, I do not currently have HIV and neither does my husband.  Neither of us have any risk factors for contracting this particular illness, it should be noted.  We have never experienced illness with an STD.

2.  Why would the FBI direct such falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer:  I think that's a valid question, and I think it needs to be determined whether the FBI engaged in any predation that was intended to cause my unlawful exposure to HIV in a medical setting, to correspond with all the falsified witness statements that came before.

3.  Are you suggesting that the FBI may be intentionally exposing "targets of interest" to serious illness through physicians whose cooperation has been coerced?

Answer:  I am.  While it sounds extremely improbable, I think the possibility must be considered.  It appears that, from a historical perspective, the Nazis engaged in similar crimes during WWII.  (There's a fascinating article in the New York Times from July 24, 2022, entitled "A University in France Confronts the Medical Sins from Its Nazi Past."

I would tend to ask whether any former Nazis were hired into the FBI or other three-letter agencies after the War, as has been alleged.  Perhaps this reflected an attempt to counter the threat of the Soviet Union.  Patterns of human atrocities can persist, albeit in slightly different form.  But we need to be fairly assertive, in my opinion, in evaluating exactly what crimes far right members of the FBI may be committing in this regard.

4.  Why?  What are the risks?

Answer:  The risks are that far right personnel within the FBI may be engaging in aggression toward Democrats and journalists for anti-democratic objectives, but doing so in such a way as to remain out of the public view.

5.  Covert war, you mean.

Answer:  Yes, that's exactly what I mean.

6.  And who would be dictating the parameters of such aggression?

Answer:  Nobody who has been voted into office by the American electorate.  And that's the problem.  Our Constitution provides for civilian control of the military.  Civilian control.  The founding fathers thought this through.  They did not want those with military or special forces capability refusing direct accountability to our Commander-in-Chief.  We happen to have a wonderful Commander-in-Chief in President Joseph R. Biden.  Far right segments of the FBI should not be assailing law-abiding American citizens in defiance of his directives.

7.  Do you think the FBI attempted to render you seriously ill with a communicable pathogen?

Answer:  I don't have evidence of that attempted crime at this time, although there are concerning signs.

8.  What are they?

Answer:  I have received thousands of threats from my stalker on my Pegasus-hacked iPhone (xxx) xxx-1467, indicating that the FBI has engaged in multiple plans to cause exactly this harm.

9.  Together with your stalker's collusion?

Answer:  Yes.

10.  Anything else?

Answer:  The Palo Alto Medical Foundation initiated an Ethics and Compliance investigation prior to my ultrasound exam and my scheduled visit with Dr. Winona Tan.  So, something problematic happened within PAMF prior to my being seen.  I just don't yet know what that was.

11.  What would be the implications if the FBI did in fact attempt this crime?

Answer:  Well first, I would say that anyone and everyone who reported to law enforcement that I was ill or promiscuous has implicated himself or herself in filing a false report at the direction of FBI personnel or affiliates.  And that's a serious matter all by itself.  So, I think those individuals would need to be held to account.

12.  In other words, lying about someone's virtue opens the door to potential physical predation.

Answer:  Exactly so.  Lies about an individual's conduct, ethics, virtue and health can set her up for horrific targeting in the future.  Witnesses who have engaged in falsified law enforcement reporting at any level need to understand this.

13.  What are the other implications?

Answer:  There are broader programmatic implications that should be urgently assessed.  If such a crime was being planned against one "target of interest," is this a "standard" component of the FBI's unlawful harms directed toward those law-abiding Americans who have been wrongfully designated as "targets"?  And how many people would that be?

14.  Are there other implications as well?

Answer:  If my stalker's genetic material is connected to the FBI's alleged attempt to harm me in this manner, as has been alleged, it seems to me the fact that my stalker is a leading member of Russian-affiliated organized crime should be revisited.  

15.  For what purpose?

Answer:  Why would far right segments of the FBI be coordinating with Russian-affiliated organized crime to harm law-abiding American citizens?  Where is that agenda originating?  With Vladimir Putin?  With FBI Director Christopher Wray?  Who thinks that Russian-affiliated totalitarianism on American soil represents a good idea?  What are the names of these people?  What badges are they carrying?  What titles?

16.  You are suggesting that such evidence, if it exists, would provide definitive proof of Russian infiltration into portions of the United States national security apparatus.

Answer: Yes,  I am.  

17.  Are there other important considerations?

Answer.  There are.  On February 21, 2020, my husband and I traveled to the Oakland headquarters of the FBI to meet in person with an agent at our own initiative.

18.  Why did you do that?

Answer:  Because my stalker had appeared to confess to committing a capital crime against a child in the autumn of 2017, and I felt it was incumbent upon me to convey this information to federal law enforcement authorities.  Beyond this, he had seemed to confess to repeatedly and intentionally infecting healthy American citizens with HIV, and I felt it was necessary to convey this information as well.

19.  Do you believe the FBI suppressed an investigation of your stalker for political reasons?

Answer:  I do, and I believe the FBI agent who should have initiated that investigation instead falsified his report of our conversation.  It would be illuminating to understand how many innocent Americans were victimized by my stalker because the FBI failed to investigate him at the appropriate time.

20.  Weren't there seventy additional child victims of Larry Nassar's predations because the FBI suppressed an investigation of him when they first learned of his crimes?

Answer:  I believe so.  I think the American public has the right to ask why the FBI appears to be protecting men who are actively preying upon women and children in violation of state and federal law.

21.  You have said that your stalker, as a leading member of Russian-affiliated organized crime in the United States, is a self-described human trafficker.  

Answer:  Yes.

22.  Do you believe that certain individuals within the FBI could be profiting from human trafficking crimes being perpetrated within the United States?

Answer:  I believe that financial ties between far right segments of the FBI and Russian-affiliated organized crime within the United States almost certainly exist.

23.  How can this best be illuminated for the American public?

Answer:  Truthfully.  I believe our democracy has been placed at risk because of the infiltration of far-right interests into the FBI and other national security agencies.  So, truthfully and courageously and factually and judiciously.  All of these.


At the end of my posts regarding the unlawful actions of far-right personnel within the FBI, I will be adding the following statement.  The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  The safety of FBI agents should be protected, just as the safety of the American citizenry should be protected.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of ALL AMERICANS that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise.  All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.

Request for Intervention Regarding HAARP/DEW Deployment

Current threats to the MacWilliams family, as communicated to me by FBI affiliates through the Pegasus hack of my cell phone (xxx) xxx-1467 include the following:

  • threats of grievous harms to Duncan MacWilliams and/or Mary Grinnell
  • threats of HAARP deployment
  • threats of DEW deployment from neighbors' properties 
  • threats of DEW deployment through devices allegedly placed in our garage on the night of August 10, 2022 when our garage door was partially opened by FBI contractors
  • threats of DEW deployment through a device allegedly placed in our attic at the direction of the FBI by Ruperto Solis
  • threats of DEW deployment through a device my stalker refers to as a truck-mounted "thrower"
  • threats of staged car accident for Ken MacWilliams when he attends a conference at the coast on Tuesday, September 27, 2022
  • threats of fire at our home in Portola Valley and/or our family home on Cape Cod
  • threats of flooding at our home in Portola Valley and/or our family home on Cape Cod
  • threats of career harms to Ken MacWilliams and/or Duncan MacWilliams

Of concern, RF radiation readings in our residence at 45 Vista Verde Way are exceptionally high at night, even without WiFi connected.  Taking a stroll outside of our home, it does appear that high and concentrated RF readings are currently emanating from one or more of our neighbors' homes.  It seems that the most powerful DEW has been placed on a neighbor's property directly across Vista Verde Way, so that is the greatest concern among nearby properties.  

In addition, I measure extremely high pulsed RF levels in our kitchen/family room/dining room areas throughout the day.  Often, these measurements are out-of-range high as measured on my TriField EMF TF2 meter.  The strength of this signal indicates a near source, giving credence to my stalker's assertion that the FBI is utilizing one or more DEW devices which it has wrongfully placed within our residence.

My family and I would appreciate any and all efforts to halt the FBI current predations toward us through DEW and HAARP deployment at home and at work, applying to all members of the MacWilliams family, and extending to Mary Grinnell.

My stalker is repeatedly requesting "silence" from me over the results of genetic testing of the biological sample OIG Hotline investigators purportedly collected from the Palo Alto Medical Foundation.

The FBI's current predations toward our family seem to be related to my stalker's fear of exposure regarding the results of this test.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliiams

Updated: Follow Up Communications With Viktor Goldmakher

OIG Hotline investigators, I will be posting all current communications with my family's summer Cape Cod tenant Viktor Goldmakher here.

Why am I taking this precaution?  

Mr. Goldmakher is of Russian descent, which may mean that he is easily controlled by FBI personnel should they extend a common threat of "espionage" investigation against him or his family.  Further, he has engaged in some unusual disclosures in recent email communications to me, including a mention of his interactions with the KGB.  Beyond this, he is working on a start-up, which no doubt has proprietary information that is important to safeguard.  And finally, he has repeatedly recommended that his friends also rent at our Cape Cod home, involving a Harvard professor of biophysics who is also potentially of Russian ethnicity.

I am aware that FBI personnel have "recruited" Mr. Goldmakher to participate in falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives against my family.  I have further been warned by my stalker xxxxxxx xxxx that the Harvard professor of biophysics recommended by Mr. Goldmakher as a future tenant has also been "recruited" as a paid informant by the FBI.  Again, the express intent here seems to be that of falsified reporting, potentially with an emphasis on false claims concerning the dissemination of IP to foreign entities (in which my family and I have never engaged and never will engage) or false claims relating to the possession of "nuclear information" (none of which my family and I possess nor will possess).  The additional potential exists of false claims surrounding Mr. Goldmakher and/or his friend as conduits for financial remuneration for crimes unknown to me and to my family.

Because I stand as a whistleblower of FBI malfeasance pertaining to the agency's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives, it appears that the FBI leadership is intent on discrediting my family and me through false accusations.  The agency appears highly capable of appropriating IP addresses, producing fake communications, false photos, and AI-generated films of crimes that never occurred.  In addition, through threats and bribes, agency personnel appear to be routinely coercing falsified witness statements regarding "targets of interest."

As a result, I believe that this degree of transparency is required in communications with Mr. Goldmakher and his Harvard professor friend is judicious.

It is important to note that I am a fiduciary of the property in question, and as such, I am at risk of legal repercussions if I turn away renters or in other ways am seen to have  mishandled the financial management of the property.  Because the FBI appears to have repeatedly attempted property divestment schemes against my family regarding this property, I am ever aware of my legal responsibility not to turn renters away.

I will be providing current and upcoming communications on this post, with updates occurring regularly.  In addition, I will be forwarding these communications to OIG Hotline investigators through other means.

Thank you for your understanding of this unusual circumstance.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams


Sent from: To: Date: September 25, 2022 at 9:24 AM

Viktor, thank you for your patience.  My husband spent several hours yesterday afternoon evaluating rents on Cape Cod and preparing the table, here attached, which shows the discounted rent for your family for the six weeks at 40 Gansett for 2023.  He determined that the current rent per week would be $4200, but I think your discounted per week rate would be $3780.  Would you please let me know if you think this is something your family can manage for summer 2023?  It would be lovely to have you return.

Perhaps you would be so kind as to inquire with your friends whether they can afford the $4200 per week for the remainder of the summer.  The taxes have increased somewhat, so I am informed, to reflect the following:  MA tax 5.7%, Falmouth tax 6%, Community Impact fee 3% and Cape Cod and Islands fee 2.75% -- for a total of 17.45%.  If your friends wish to rent for fewer than 32 days, these short-term occupancy taxes would apply.

If they would like to proceed, I will determine the best means of communication with them, and we can take it from there.

OK, Viktor, once again, I appreciate your patience, and I look forward to hearing from you regarding your thoughts.

All best,

Lane MacWilliams


Sent to: From: Date:  Monday, September 26, 2022, 9:17 PM

Hi Lane,

Thank you. I am definitely interested.  Please give me several days for a specific answer.



Sent to:  From: Date: Wednesday, September 28, 2022, 8:20 AM

Certainly, Viktor.


Sunday, September 25, 2022

A Word About Anger Expressed by Targets of Interest

 1.  What do you feel about the FBI's utilization of unlawfully recorded "targets of interest" in the agency's effort to discredit them?  Some of those recordings allegedly involve the privately expressed anger of "targets of interest."

Answer:  The privacy violations in which the FBI is routinely engaging are clearly unconstitutional.  The agency is currently skirting its constitutional obligations to the American people by training contractors to exercise unwarranted surveillance facilitated by Pegasus software, among other means of privacy incursion.  After law-abiding American citizens are unlawfully recorded, that information is purchased back from contractors by the FBI.  

2.  So the FBI is finding refuge in the excuse that it is simply aggregating information about law-abiding American citizens, but not surveilling them directly?

Answer:  In many cases, yes.  It needs to be stated, however, that when the FBI coerces a false witness statement from someone alleging crimes as serious as "espionage," "terrorism," or "abuse of the vulnerable," the agency is falsely justifying direct surveillance.

3.  But what about unlawfully recorded anger on the part of "targets of interest"?

Answer:  My understanding is that the FBI often re-edits the recorded dialogue of "targets of interest" to attempt to make them sound dangerous or unstable, thereby attempting to justify previously initiated unlawful surveillance.

4.  Do "targets of interest" have the right to their anger?

Answer:  Privately expressed?  They certainly do.  It's important to understand that people have human limits.  If you send one thousand men to kill one individual woman, her private anger over that injustice may help her survive.  No one should attempt to deprive her of her righteous indignation, in my opinion.

5.  But anger is not always reasonably expressed.

Answer:  By definition.  A "target" may state in a private expression of anger that she intends to "get" her stalker, when what she is trying to say is that she intends to bring him to justice in a way that respects the rule of law in its entirety.  We do employ idiomatic language, particularly when angry.  But I think that, when a "target of interest" is publicly expressing her commitment to the rule of law, we need to understand that she is sincere in her adherence to reason and due process as manifested by a nation of laws.  "Targets of interest" are, as a group, peaceable people who cannot fathom why they have been unjustly targeted by an inhumane program of surveillance, harassment and harm.

6.  Are you a peaceable person?

Answer:  In every way, shape and form.  I support democracy, the rule of law, rational and reasoned due process based on tangible evidence.  I support peer-reviewed medical treatment, the scientific method, civil discourse, a free press, free speech, freedom of assembly, the right to privacy and the Constitutionally protected civil liberties and human rights of all Americans.

7.  And is your husband a peaceable person?

Answer:  Yes, just as determinedly as I.

8.  Yet you feel that anger is an important emotion for "targets of interest"?

Answer:  Anger, privately expressed, can allow "targets of interest" the chance of survival.

9.  Why?  

Answer:  Their alternative is depression, and depression in the absence of social support can have disastrous consequences.

10.  At a certain point, most "targets of interest" begin to feel overwhelmed by the FBI's implemented "gang stalking" approach.

Answer:  They do.  The FBI deploys an intentional program of slander and defamation, social isolation, career harms, property divestment, and physical assault against "targets of interest."  Almost all of them will experience severe impacts on their quality of life.

11.  Under such circumstances, it would be impossible for "targets of interest" not to experience frustration and despair at times.

Answer:  True.  Even so, it is necessary for "targets of interest" to continue to express an ongoing commitment to the rule of law.

12.  Even though others are violating the law in preying upon "targets of interest"?

Answer:  Especially so.  The far right is attempting to falsely portray "targets of interest" as dangerous and unstable people whom the FBI must closely surveil and limit.

13.  Can you give an example of this false portrayal?

Answer:  I can.  Quora featured a post this morning from former NSA Intelligence Analyst Karen Stewart in answer to the question, What do targeted individuals think about their experiences?  Most of her answer expresses the "shock and disbelief" of "targets of interest." But at a certain point, Ms. Stewart states that "Anyone/everyone involved is guilty of crimes against humanity and war crimes and they ALL need to be executed from top to bottom."  Later, she expresses a hope that "eternity" for these individuals should "start soon."  I reprint the entire post herewith:

Shock, disbelief that SO many people are so greedy, stupid, vile as to take money to harass innocent people “becuz da Gubment say so”. Mad as hell. And beyond furious government is so very corrupt as to design a SECRET COWARDLY psyop campaign, saying INNOCENT people are “threats” merely to bilk the government (Fed and State) out of billions upon billions of dollars (massive fraud) forever, to base an UNNEEDED POLICE STATE ON. Humans NEED food, water, and …Justice to live. Anyone/everyone involved is guilty of crimes against humanity and war crimes and they ALL need to be executed from top to bottom. Conspiracy to deprive of rights, conspiracy to torture, conspiracy to murder and human trafficking are at the core. The program has drawn out the secret/covert sociopaths and psychopaths in society and they need to be tried in a military tribunal (immediate justice, no delays after sentencing). (Imagine a society almost totally free of sociopaths and psychopaths?) Without such sick people, this program could not have succeeded. And all officials… police, local authorities, civilians, Federal, military who participated should be considered rabid dogs as well to be dealt with similarly. As far as mercy, give them exactly as much mercy as they gave us. Zero. I cannot speak for all victims, but this is what I feel. Deuteronomy 27: 24–25, Cursed is he who smiteth (murders) his neighbor secretly; cursed is he who smiteth his neighbor secretly for money. Cursed = damned to hell. Let their eternity there start soon.

14.  Is Ms. Stewart's expression illegal?

Answer:  Potentially.  A lawyer or law enforcement officer would need to weigh in on the specifics of Ms. Stewart's language. But from my perspective, this post can be interpreted as encouraging others to commit violence, and because of this, I find it completely unacceptable.

15.  You have said that sometimes the FBI directs certain individuals, even "targets of interest," to post in a manner that seems unstable or dangerous in an effort to discredit "targets of interest" as a whole.

Answer:  That is my distinct impression.

16.  What about former NSA Intelligence Analyst Karen Stewart's post on Quora this morning?

Answer:  I have never seen Ms. Stewart espousing any form of violence online or elsewhere previous to this morning.

17.  Does it seem uncharacteristic to you?

Answer:  It does.

18.  What are the risks present?

Answer:  Any "target of interest" who responds to Ms. Stewart's post is likely to be classified by the FBI as supporting violent action, when in truth, that is unlikely to be the case.

19.  What would you like to emphasize?

Answer:  Law-abiding "targets of interest" need to consciously and consistently and publicly explain that they are peaceable people who are committed to the rule of law in all circumstances.  They need to hold fast to the principles of peaceable civil engagement upon which all democracies depend.

20.  Why do you feel so strongly about this conduct?

Answer:  Because "targets of interest" need advocacy from those allies within our government who support true democracy -- and they are present.  We are exceptionally fortunate to have President Joseph R. Biden as our Commander-in-Chief at this point in our nation's history, when our democracy is being put so clearly to the test.  And President Biden's administration is laboring valiantly to save our democracy from those who would unmake it.  We need to make it clear that we, as law-abiding "targets of interest," stand with reasoned, rational civil discourse in illuminating the truth of this matter.

21.  It will take courage for Americans to face the truth of the FBI's corruption of the "target of interest" program.

Answer:  It will, but our democracy has no alternative.  We need to have the courage to face the truth of the FBI's engagement in falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives, because no organization can address its own wrongs entirely by itself.  In the public sphere, we need to set aside our private anger over these abuses of the public trust and publicly reconfirm our commitment to defend one another's civil liberties and human rights as law-abiding American citizens.  It is the generosity of spirit present in our determination to defend one another's civil liberties that renders us worthy possessors of democracy's inheritance.  

22.  And what is that inheritance?

Answer:  A government of the people, by the people and for the people.

Friday, September 23, 2022

The Hypothetical Scenario: When Safe Access to Medical Care Is Denied

1.  I would like to ask you a set of hypothetical questions.  And they do not apply to anyone's life in particular, but I'm curious to hear your perspective.

Answer:  Okay.

2.  What would you do if you were in a situation in which you thought you had cancer, but you could not access medical care?

Answer:  I'm not clear on whether you're suggesting a definitive diagnosis.

3.  No, there would be no definitive diagnosis, because you could not safely access medical care.  But nonetheless, due to symptoms, you would believe you likely had cancer.

Answer:  May I ask what symptoms?

4.  Bleeding, initially.  And then, perhaps you would actually be able to palpate a tumor abdominally.

Answer:  Oh, wow.  That sounds like a  phenomenally difficult circumstance.  And why exactly would I be unable to safely access medical care?

5. You would be in a circumstance that would not allow it.

Answer:  A desert island circumstance?

6.  Something like that, yes.  What would you do?

Answer:  Honestly, I would probably grieve for a couple days at first.  I'm sixty years old, but I feel like I'm about thirty.  There are some significant contributions I would like to be able to make.

7.  You would only grieve for a couple of days?

Answer:  It would be very important not to feel sorry for oneself in a situation like the one you're describing.  It sounds like a circumstance involving necessary isolation from care and support, so it would be tremendously important to remain optimistic.  You're only defeated if you accept that there's no way to change your situation.

8.  How would you attempt to change your situation?

Answer:  I would probably go after the cancer stem cells by following the sequence described in an excellent 2017 paper in the medical journal Oncotarget, entitled "Vitamin C and Doxycycline:  A synthetic lethal combination therapy targeting metabolic flexibility in cancer stem cells (CSCs)."

9.  This is merely an in vitro study?

Answer:  Yes, but the science is quite good.  I'm not suggesting that this should replace established medical care, but you have offered me a hypothetical situation in which safe access to medical care would not be available to me.  So, this is what I would turn toward.

10.  Can you explain in layman's terms what the paper says?

Answer:  Well, I am a layperson, so, by definition, yes.  Cancer cells -- all cancer cells involving cancer of every type -- have one Achilles' heel involving metabolic flexibility.  The cancer cell takes in energy through highly active mitochondrial respiration, and its energy needs are higher than that of normal cells.  But Doxycyline, as an OXPHOS inhibitor, forces the cell to adapt to an alternate phenotype, in which energy is taken in to the cancer cell through glycolysis.  After nine weeks on increasing Doxycycline dosages, mitochondrial respiration is thoroughly suppressed, and the cancer cells all transition to glycolysis.  At that point, a discontinuation of Doxycycline and a transition to high-dose Vitamin C kills the cancer cells.

11.  All of them?

Answer:  It's important to recognize that cancer cells that have transitioned to the glycolytic phenotype are capable of adapting back to mitochondrial respiration over time.  So, if some cancer cells were not reached on the first cycle, you could likely reach them on a subsequent cycle.

12.  You mean that, after eight or nine weeks on high-dose vitamin C, you could transition back to the Doxycycline?

Answer:  Potentially, yes.  Or an alternate OXPHOS inhibitor.  And the principles of OXPHOS inhibitors are explained in the excellent paper by cancer researchers De Francesco, Bonucelli, Maggionlini, Sotgia, and Lisanti, mentioned above.

13.  So you could cycle back and forth between an OXPHOS inhibitor and the glycolysis inhibitor of high dose Vitamin C, and in that way ...

Answer:  In that way, you should be able to kill all the cancer stem cells.

14. Is that equivalent to eradicating the cancer itself?

Answer:  It is, yes.

15.  How would you know whether it was working?

Answer:  Well, I think most obviously, if the bleeding stopped and if the tumor was no longer palpable over time, I would feel fairly assured that it was working.  Again, I am in no way suggesting that anyone turn away from traditional, documented, peer-reviewed best practices in oncology.  But you have suggested a highly unusual circumstance, in which I would be isolated from professional medical attention at a time when I desperately needed it.  So, in that hypothetical situation, this would be my course of action.

16.  Can you imagine any real-life situation in which this hypothetical situation could manifest?

Answer:  As a real circumstance in my life?

17.  Yes.

Answer:  Wow.  I could come up with some unlikely scenario if I were pressed to do so.

18.  Like what, for example?

Answer:  Well, let's say that I were a whistleblower of corruption within a couple of major programs within the FBI.  I might be able to imagine a circumstance in which the FBI would be highly motivated to obstruct my safe access to medical care under those circumstances.

19.  What if those people who had been supporting your case found out that you had developed cancer?

Answer:  I would very much want them to know that I was getting well.

20.  Why?

Answer:  Let's imagine that the truth of my particular case could potentially help millions of other innocent people.  We could even go one step further and imagine that the truth of my case could help the cause of democracy itself.  In that circumstance, I would want everyone to know that I was healing quite beautifully, that I was vigorous and energetic, and looking forward to advocating for the truth on behalf of many others.

21.  Wouldn't it require a lot of courage to face something like this on your own?

Answer:  Yes, but then I think it would be hugely exhilarating to heal from such a serious illness against all the odds.

22.  You would probably come through such an experience with a renewed sense of purpose.

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Yes, I would.

Blog Post Concerning Viktor Goldmakher Has Been Altered By a Third Party

OIG Hotline, please be aware that my blog post entitled, "Documentation of Communications with Russian Emigre Viktor Goldmakher," has been repeatedly corrupted.

The final email in that thread, sent from Viktor Goldmakher to me, reads as follows:

Hi Lane -- of course I can wait -- no rush.  About my friends, certainly, I respect your point of view, although of course I would never have our friends sign any sublease or any document at all.  Let me know if it is OK for them to directly contact you via email.

About the FBI, I have no worries at all because of my previous experience with the KGB.  As soon as my family applied for emigration from the USSR in 1979, I was immediately considered an enemy of the state and had to face the KGB.  This was serious.  In addition, as an officer in reserve (every young male in the USSR was in reserve), I faced being sent to war in Afghanistan.  So, with this experience, I am not afraid of the FBI at all, especially in a law-abiding society, which is our country.  There is no way the FBI could intimidate me or make me do anything wrong.

Best regards,


Good people of the OIG Hotline, if my stalker is to be believed, Mr. Viktor Goldmakher is quite readily controlled by his FBI handler.

My stalker has alleged that the "friend" with whom Mr. Goldmakher is attempting to place me in direct communication is in fact a Physics professor from Harvard whom the FBI has already recruited.  Why have FBI personnel allegedly done this?  Apparently, they wish to have a purported "source" for the supposed "nuclear information" in my family's possession.

Good people of the OIG Hotline, my family does not possess any "nuclear information"!  At all!  In any context!  Nor have we ever!

At a certain point, law-abiding "targets of interest" want the truth to be embraced and the lies of far right FBI personnel to be discredited.

That point is now.

As President Biden has so thoughtfully expressed, we stand at an inflection point in our democracy.

The truth of the actions of far right FBI personnel in preying upon the law-abiding American public must be articulated for the American electorate if our democracy is to have any chance of survival.

For far right FBI personnel to be falsely accusing law-abiding "targets of interest" of "espionage," "terrorism,"  "predation toward the vulnerable,"  "animal abuse," "prostitution," "drug manufacture," etc. represents a set of heinous crimes perpetrated by corrupt federal law enforcement officials for political objectives.  We need to understand whether, in fact, law-abiding "targets of interest" are over-represented by Democrats and journalists, as my stalker has alleged, and we need to do so quickly.

For me, one of the most astonishing aspects of the FBI as an agency is that, when far right personnel are caught in a lie, they double down with further lies.

One always expects that, in the face of hard evidence, dishonest people will have to concede their fault.

Yet, they don't!  They persist yet further to tarnish their virtuous victims.  We saw this sort of egregious and inexcusable scapegoating of the Jews during World War II.  Why are we allowing the scapegoating of "targets of interest" now?

Good people of the OIG Hotline, to stand with me in defense of the truth is to stand with the truth in defense of our democracy.

I ask for that faith at this time.

You will never find a "target of interest" of greater courage, more determination, greater resilience, more resourcefulness, or higher integrity.  Nor will you find within materials responsive to a FOIA request corrupted witness statements which the FBI failed to conceal with secrecy agreements, as are reported to exist in this case.

The approach to this circumstance by all of us who love democracy must be assertive, insistent, and urgent, in my opinion.

The "insider threat" represented by far right segments of the FBI is a clear and present one.

Our country must find the fortitude to face it with honesty and immediacy.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Is Equinox Engaged in Money-Laundering for Far Right Criminal Interests?

I don't know the answer to this question.

What I do know is that several of the trainers at Equinox Palo Alto claimed to personally know my stalker, who is, by his own description, a leading member of the far right, a human trafficker, and a ranking member of Russian-affiliated organized crime within the United States.

Did myriad trainers at Equinox, being under my stalker's control, knowingly contribute to falsified law enforcement reporting being aggregated by the FBI as part of its corrupted Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and its affiliated "target of interest" program?

I don't know the answer to this question either.

And the reason I don't know is that San Mateo County Sheriff's Office and the FBI have both failed to fulfill my Freedom of Information Act requests, despite my steadfast, tireless efforts in insisting that San Mateo County Sheriff's Case Report #19-11840, opened by my husband and me as an investigative report on my stalker, should be provided to me in their entirety.

Logically, I would just ask readers to consider the following.

If nothing is false within San Mateo County Sheriff's Deputy Rick Chaput's Case Report #19-11840, then why did he attempt to write a "replacement report" #20-02355, which he described to my husband as "more accurate"?

If material within these case reports reflects only the truth, then why has it been unlawfully withheld from me for twenty months, all the while my life, and the lives of my family members, have been under active threat?

If materials responsive to my FOIA requests are not corrupted, then why have I been continually pressured by FBI affiliates to accept redacted information?

If the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office and the FBI personnel who have added to this law enforcement reporting are telling the truth, then why have I been repeatedly pressured to accept materials without an AI-generated film bearing my likeness that is reported to be among the materials responsive to my FOIA request?

People, there is something very wrong here.  Very, very, very, very wrong.

Whether Equinox employees contributed to falsified law enforcement reporting within these materials, I don't know.  I haven't seen the information responsive to my request.  

I have been deprived of it, despite the fact that this material has been broadly distributed nationwide through federal information-sharing programs HSIN, N-DEx and/or LEEP.

The withholding of this material from me is unlawful.  In every way.  Unlawful.  Unethical.  Indefensible.

I have had ONE lifetime intimate partner, my wonderful husband of 32 years.

If anyone has alleged otherwise, I have the right to know that information, and, further, I have the right to take any and all slanderers and defamers to court.

If the FBI is extending pay to American citizens to lie about one another within falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives, the American public has both the right and the necessity to know that far right members of the agency are committing these crimes.

Without this full reckoning, our democracy is lost.

I am not willing to concede that struggle for our nation's soul, and I don't think President Biden is either.

Those who have lied about me or about my husband at the direction of my stalker and his FBI cohort need to face us in a court of law and explain their crimes.  What was the reason for this predation?  That we contribute to the Democratic Party?  That we are engaged and thoughtful and moderate members of the American electorate?

I am informed that my stalker has attempted to discredit me of late with a recording of my voice castigating him for his violence and then breaking down into tears.

Good people of the OIG Hotline, it takes acting ability to stay alive for five years when predators such as my stalker and his cohort are actively stalking an individual woman and her family.

Anyone who understands the life-and-death seriousness of the matter will be motivated to perform, adapt, improvise, and overcome -- and to do so repeatedly.  These men are highly dangerous -- they work in groups -- and they exhibit no conscience or remorse.  

There are times that my survival has been supported by expressed emotion.  I do not think I should be penalized for that ingenuity.  This journey has required the nerves of steel, creativity, and resourcefulness of someone with a military training I never received.

I feel proud of myself for my combined strength and adaptability under circumstances of extreme and ongoing predation perpetrated by far right criminals working in teams.

The fact that most people could not have done what I have done makes me all the more determined to help those law-abiding "targets of interest" who are without advocacy, despite their best efforts.

My ongoing quest for all materials responsive to my FOIA request is a quest for the truth.

It is miraculous that my family and I have survived long enough to continue to articulate my civil liberties in this matter.

But that miracle should be answered by the provision of all materials responsive to my FOIA request, as well as my husband's.

My plea is one borne of dedication to our democracy and sheer force of will in defense of our Constitution.

Stand with me in this worthy cause.  

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Documentation of Communications With Russian Emigre Viktor Goldmakher

OIG Hotline, because my stalker has made clear to me that my longtime summer tenant on Cape Cod, Mr. Viktor Goldmakher, has been coerced by the FBI into provideing falsifed witness statements regarding my family, I am concerned about the communication below, in which Mr. Goldmakher mentions his experience with the KGB.  Out of an abundance of caution, I include this information herewith to prevent any attempts on the part of the FBI to mischaracterize these communications.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

*************************************************************************************This is to document my concerns regarding my summer tenant Viktor Golkmakher's email, included below, mentioning his experience with the KGB.

The FBI is quite experienced at creating disinformation based on such communicaitons, as in "Target discussed KGB with Viktor Goldmakher," for example, twisting and projecting mentions like this to bolster knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives.

My stalker xxxxxxx xxxx has suggested that the FBI has, at his direction, knowingly alleged the appalling falsehood that Ken and/or I are involved in some sort of illegal activity relating to "espionage."

So, it's really not possible for me to answer Viktor Goldmakher's email mentioning his experience with the KGB.

I absolutely cannot touch such communciations, given the risks they may represent to to my family's safety.

Because the FBI is quite capable of generating email communications that never transpired, there are risks present on the basis of Mr. Goldmakher's Russian heritage alone.

Of greatest concern, the FBI's objective does not seem to be one of drawing "targets" into a courtroom, but rather in justifying physical attacks based on spurious claims of the "national security interest."

The FBI is said to have a "disposition matrix" which contains lists of law-abiding Americans the agency intends to kill, for political reasons, no less.

Dare I ask what happens to whistleblowers of FBI malfeasance?  Given that I am a whistleblower who has been wrongfully placed on the "disposition matrix," I think I am in the process of finding out.

Yet the American public remains almost entirely unaware that far right segments of the FBI are committing these crimes, in stark violation of the Constitution and the rule of law.

How can we illuminate the truth of far right agents' malfeasance in this situation?

This remains to be seen.

Lane MacWilliams


Sent to: From: Date:  Monday, September 19, 2022, 11:11 AM

Re:  40 Gansett Summer 2023

Hi Viktor,

I hope this email finds you well.

I wanted to touch base with you, as I've embarked on an analysis of the Cape rental market.  It does seem as though rents have increased quite a bit, but you have been long-time tenants and we have valued your presence at the house.

Before I suggest an update on the rental price, I would like to have some input from you with regard to your circumstances and budget, please.

That would be a great help.

Thank you for getting back to me,
Lane MacWilliams


Sent to :  From: Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 8:49 AM

Hi Lane,

I hope that everything is well with you. I am fine.

You asked me about my circumstances and budget. I am a biologist, developing novel antibody-based anti-cancer drugs. Two of the drugs (against breast cancer and against multiple myeloma) have been approved by the FDA, and the third one (against ovarian cancer) will likely be approved by the end of the year. I discovered these drugs while being an employee of a biotechnology company. Two years ago, I left my job as Director of Discovery, and with my business partner co-founded a startup in which we develop a new class of anti-cancer drugs. Initial funding of the startup came from me and from my business partner; then we got money from an “angel investor”. At this point, all the money goes strictly into research, I have no income from the company.

It may change in a year or two: our latest drug candidate works well in mice bearing human pancreatic cancer, and with these results, we have a good chance of getting funding from large investors for further research & development, which also will enable us to pay ourselves decent salaries.

So, for the last two years, all income of my wife and I was from our Social Security benefits plus my wife’s additional income (she teaches Russian literature); all together it gives ~ $ 85,000 per year. In addition, I have savings from which I gradually draw money. Thus, despite the relatively low income for the last two years, I was comfortable renting your house on the Cape. Last year the rent was $ 13,950 for five weeks, plus you generously gave us another week for free (thank you!). If you slightly increase the rent in 2023, I will still be comfortable paying it. If you consider a large increase, let me know, and I will consider it.

Renting a house in Falmouth with bigger beds and central air conditioning, may  be an option for me, but your house has several advantages: 1) our grandchildren love the beach 2)  it is close to the Children School of Science 3) a special aura – both Nina and I like to spend a few weeks in an estate of Herzen’s descendants!

Will there be a discount if we rent for the whole summer? We don’t need more than 6 weeks, but our friends (good responsible people) are potentially interested in renting the remaining 2-3 weeks in August. It would be cost efficient for them to be on our lease in order to avoid short term rental taxes. If you agree, we could sign a rental agreement for the summer (and be responsible for the property), but our friends would spend 2-3 weeks in the house. If this is an option, please let me know. When we know the price for the summer, I will check with my friends whether they are still interested.

I hope that my family will be able to spend another summer in your house.

Wishing you a good year,


p.s. in case you are interested in my professional background, have in mind that all my publications are under a more conventional spelling of my name: Victor Goldmacher (the Viktor Goldmakher spelling was assigned to me by an immigration officer when we immigrated into the US in 1981).


Sent to: From: Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2022, at 8:57 AM

Viktor, thank you for your thoughtful letter.  Because I have such fundamental respect for the IP of startups, I try quite intentionally to know nothing about them.  Sadly, the FBI has a pattern of falsely accusing law-abiding American citizens of unlawful IP "transfers" to various foreign countries.  If they can't manage to pull that off, they try to bring world-class physicists into the sphere of their "targets," so they can falsely accuse them of possessing knowledge relating to  "nuclear technology."  Suffice it to say that the FBI's lies and predations render one extremely cautious.  This level of institutional dishonesty certainly renders no one safer or more secure!  FBI personnel who have been co-opted by the far right now represent an "insider threat" to our democracy, sadly enough.

I hasten to say that the agency is deeply divided.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.

I'm delighted that you and your family wish to return to 40 Gansett for summer 2023, Viktor.  I've taken a look at rents in general, but we would of course give a discount for the six weeks.  I would like to have my husband's help in making a proposal, which he should be able to manage this weekend. So, I should be able to propose something to you by Sunday or Monday.  Will that timing work for you?

I am not at liberty to have anyone sublet the property, because insurance coverage is affected by subleases.  Also, regarding the short-term occupancy taxes, while I understand your thoughtful desire to assist your friends financially, it is my formal responsibility to ensure that the state of Massachusetts receives all the taxes she is due.  I do my utmost to fulfill that responsibility.  Most of the short-term occupancy taxes go toward protecting the Cape environment, which I know all of us want to see honored and preserved.  Cape Cod is such an extraordinary gem.  Having grown up there, I find that my memories are sustaining to the spirit.  I hope your grandchildren will cherish the memories you are making for them, too, Viktor.  You are extending to your family a rather timeless gift.

All best,

Wednesday, September 21, 2022

UPDATE: A Facebook Notification Regarding Access

OIG Hotline investigators, I have re-established two-factor authentication on my Facebook account, as Meta requested of me, below, on September 21, 2022.

Please notify me if I can further assist your access to my account.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams


OIG Hotline investigators, I received the following notification from Facebook's parent company, Meta, this afternoon, appearing to indicate that I will be forced to reinstate two-factor authentication on my Facebook account by September 27, 2022.  

My Facebook account will remain accessible for the time being, but I will abide by this deadline.

Having said that, I hereby formally grant OIG Hotline investigators my full permission to access my Facebook account at any time they so desire.

I am sure that investigators are free to proceed of their own accord.  But if any other documentation should be required for the OIG Hotline Investigations Division to obtain full access to my Facebook account, please let me know.

I will be happy to provide whatever supporting attestation will assist.

I grant this permission to OIG Hotline Investigations Division of my own fee will and accord.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams


The following document is transcribed for ease of reading.

Email from: To:

Date:  September 21, 2022 at 1:43 p.m.

Re:  Secure your account to keep access

Hi Lane,

If someone compromises your Facebook account, they could take control of business assets like ad accounts, Pages, lines of credit or the Business Manager.

To continue managing Meta Business Accounts and assets, you'll need to turn on two-factor authentication by September 27, 2022.

Failure to turn on two-factor authentication will result in restricted access.

Two-factor authentication is when we ask for a verification code in addition to your password if we notice a login from an unrecognized device or browser.  This makes it harder for others to gain access to your account and take control of your business.

A Big-hearted Commitment

1.  What does it take to survive a situation like this, in which federal and local law enforcement are aiding and abetting a stalker who is a self-described predator?

Answer:  It's important to clarify that you're asking about the most extreme sort of predator.

2.  You have said that your stalker has described himself as someone who has taken the lives of others.

Answer:  That is correct.  He has appeared to acknowledge this.

3.  So, how have you survived?

Answer:  Beyond high adaptability and an inclination to learn rapidly, I have had the help of many people. My husband has believed in me.  My President has believed in me.  The OIG Hotline has believed in me.  My stalker has himself extended frequent warnings to me, which has helped me to protect myself.  And I have also received help at critical times from certain individuals within other agencies, including the FBI, who have taken an interest in my progress.

4.  You have said that the FBI is a deeply divided agency.

Answer:  And it absolutely is.  There are many highly honorable people within the FBI who take their vows to the Constitution as oaths they would never willingly violate.

5.  The FBI alleges that it has recorded you speaking in anger at times, and these recordings have been used to discredit you in various settings.

Answer:  Segments of the FBI specialize in disinformation.  Unlawful privacy violations committed by the FBI should not be rewarded by others with the gift of credibility extended to the assertions of the far right within the agency.

6.  You have said at times that you might have earned three Oscars over the past few years, given all that has been required of you.  What do you mean by that?

Answer:  One psychopath is a handful, truly.  Just one psychopath will wreak havoc in an otherwise peaceful life.  But when facing groups of predatory men working together as FBI contractors and far right FBI personnel?  Such a situation requires that a "target" learns how to engage in entertaining oratory, notice ten thousand infinitesimal details that may be important later, and cry on queue.

7.  In other words, surviving thus far has required generous help from others and nerves of steel from you.

Answer:  That's fair to say.  But I would also like to say that it's not possible to survive something like this if one is only working for oneself.

8.  What do you mean by that?

Answer:  I am aware that there are millions of other "targets of interest" who have not been able to find advocacy, despite their best efforts.  I cannot abandon those good people.  I'm not willing to abandon them.  I have to keep striving -- not on my own behalf so much as theirs.  Our whole democracy rests on our shared understanding of this big-hearted commitment to our fellow Americans.

9.  You have previously mentioned that you have a faith in God.

Answer:  Carl Jung once said that he didn't "believe" in God.  Instead, he "knew."  At a certain point, faith becomes more.

10.  Has your faith become "more" partly as a result of your travails?

Answer:  Yes, it has.  It's only advisable to take a journey like this one with a knowledge that God, in His infinite wisdom, is watching over us.