My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Sunday, July 31, 2022

Privacy Rights and Confidentiality Rights

A Clarification of My Privacy Rights

August 3, 2022

To the Office of the Inspector General Hotline, U.S. DOJ and the Honorable Avril Haines, ODNI:

This is to clarify my retention of my privacy rights and confidentiality rights.

1.  No one has the right to distribute fake or defamatory material concerning me, no matter its origin, to anyone other than OIG Hotline investigators.

2.  No one has the right to distribute private and confidential material concerning me, no matter its origin, to anyone other than OIG Hotline investigators.

I maintain all rights to my voice, my image and/or likeness, my name, my medical records, and my reputation.  

Those who have defamed me through the dissemination of such records are separately and wholly liable to me under the law.

The collection and dissemination of falsified information regarding me by FBI employees and affiliates, as well as my private information by FBI employees and affiliates, stands in clear and ongoing violation of my constitutional rights.

I have granted certain access to the OIG Hotline to collect, not disseminate, information from my medical providers and legal advocates to assist in this Office's investigation of falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives.  And I have granted permission to certain physicians and attorneys to share information with OIG Hotline investigators only.  These select permissions stand in full force and effect.

I hope this is clear for those within the FBI, DOJ, or ODNI who are confused regarding these points.

Please convey to all concerned that violations of my privacy rights will be prosecuted fully.

A July 31, 2022 document entitled "Privacy Rights and Confidentiality Rights," is replaced by this document and rendered null and void by it.

Thank you very much for your support in this matter,




Lane MacWilliams


Contents of FedEx Mailing to the OIG Hotline (Tracking Number 276196103799)

This afternoon, my husband sent a FedEx mailing on my behalf to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice for delivery on Monday, August 1, 2022.  Its tracking number is 276196103799, and I include both the receipt and the list of contents herewith, along with a photo of the hand-sealed package.

Contents of this mailing:

Blog Post: Details to Assist the OIG Hotline in the Investigation of the FBI's "Target of Interest" Program, July 30, 2022 (https://lanevonherzen.blogspot.com).   6 pages.  The redactions within the original blog post have been removed in this communication.

Permissions relating to an ongoing legal matter.  6 pages.

Permissions relating to medical care providers.  32 pages.  Physicians included:  Dr. Winona Tan, PAMF Ultrasound Manager Prissy and staff, Dr. Yumi Ando, Dr. Judith Nevitt, Dr. Winston Vaughan, Dr. Christina Kong, Hillview Laboratory, Dr. David Lieberman, Dr. Sachin Parikh, Dr. Ben Erickson, Sabina Schnapek, Dr. Ian Kroes, Dr. Tayyeba Ali, Dr. Jordan Piluek, Dr. Ann Jarayam, Dr. Jackson Lau.

Permissions relating to legal advocacy:  8 pages.  Attorneys included:  Nicholas Heimlich, Peter Schlueter, Christopher Bou-Saeed, John Bradley.

Letter to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline, Investigations Division, July 29, 2022. 6 pages.

These communications are enclosed within a manila envelope which bears four wax seals, as pictured below.





When Fire Departments Are Signatory to Infragard and An FBI Whistleblower Is Facing Threats of Arson



.


ADDENDUM:  This post has been updated as of August 2, 2022.  The following documentation has been forwarded to the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ.


I am informed that Woodside Fire Protection District Captain Sean Devlin and the Fire Marshal are in ongoing communication with the FBI/Infragard concerning their participation in an arson crime at 45 Vista Verde Way. 

Apparently, there is an intent to set fire to our field, to have a fire department “response,” and to insist on a “medical evaluation” for me at a hospital. The resultant ambulance ride, according to my stalker, is planned to involve a morphine overdose. 

This threat is alleged to be in retaliation for my standing as a whistleblower of corruption of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the FBI’s affiliated “target of interest” program.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Lane MacWilliams 




The first two of the letters below were sent to Captain Sean Devlin of the Woodside Fire Protection District on July 8, 2022 and July 11, 2022, following Captain Devlin's unexpected visit to my front door, alongside three of his Fire District colleagues.

The second two letters were sent to Fire Chief Timothy Smith, Scott Thrasher and Chad Absten of the Falmouth, MA Fire Department on July 20 2022 and July 25, 2022.

I will transcribe the text of these emails, for ease of reading, tomorrow.

For now, hopefully, this record will allow my family to sleep safely in our beds despite the myriad arson threats of which I am in receipt this evening.


Sent:  Friday, July 8, 2022 at 10:09 pm
From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com
To: sdevlin@woodsidefire.org

Sean, thank you very much for stopping by the house today, together with your colleagues from the Woodside Fire Protection District.

As I mentioned, I have received threats from FBI affiliates for several years. But, as I have gotten closer to the fulfillment of my Freedom of Information Act request from the FBI -- which I am told reveals corruption of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the FBI's related "target of interest" program, the threats have escalated.

Obviously, we wish to do all we can to avoid a fire on our property.

That said, I was informed this afternoon that the Woodside Fire Protection District is signatory to Infragard, and, beyond this, that you yourself have an arrangement allowing you to accept individual compensation from Infragard.  I was further informed that the Fire Marshall has a remunerative relationship with Infragard, which is of additional concern to us.  These relationships present clear conflicts of interest given my role as an FBI whistleblower.

Please be apprised that any false denial of dialogue with the FBI and/or Infragard concerning this matter opens up the County, as well as County employees, to criminal and civil liability.  The FBI handlers, clearly, are implicated in this matter as well. 

It's worth noting that FBI personnel will advise you to destroy all evidence of your communications with the agency, but you should preserve these records for your own documentation.  

As I explained to you today, the NSARI and affiliated programs are worth billions in congressional budget appropriations every year, and the FBI  is keenly interested in having those dollar flows continue.

The problem is that these programs are extensively corrupted by falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives.  This issue is currently under investigation by the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice.  And the White House is involved as well -- and all praise to President Biden, as well as the heroes within the DOJ on that front.

Obviously, this matter carries with it extremely serious implications  for the future of our democracy.

Sean, the FBI appears to have been involved in some fairly elaborate schemes to keep their programs involving falsified law enforcement reporting intact.  These men are practiced in their techniques and they do not want to be held accountable for their crimes.  Given this reality, we cannot have anyone on the property who is signatory to Infragard at this time.

It's a question of our family's safety and the safety of our property, and I'm sure you can appreciate these very real concerns.

Perhaps my husband and I can find an independent fire safety expert with no ties to predatory federal law enforcement.  This might be our best option in view of the current conflicts of interest.

Thank you for your understanding.

Sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
45 Vista Verde Way
Portola Valley

Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 at 6:30 pm
From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com
To: sedevlin@woodsidefire.org

Sean, your silence in response to my email of July 9, 2022 confirms for me the likelihood that the Woodside Fire Protection District and the Fire Marshal, and you yourself are signatory to Infragard, as has been alleged to me.

Given the extensive arson threats I have received from FBI affiliates, I find these relationships with the FBI and Infragard to be deeply concerning.

Should there be any fire at my home or on my property, the Woodside Fire Protection District and its personnel would come under immediate scrutiny from investigators at the federal level, and it's important that you understand this.

All of us should be supporting an outcome in which fire is prevented, and lives and property are protected.

I would appreciate your ongoing cooperation in these aims.

Sean, our democracy is important -- not only in the preservation of our own civil liberties and human rights, but also in defense of the rights of others.

Your honesty and integrity on an individual level matter in that defense.

I encourage you and your department to hold to your highest principles, even, and especially, when others may be attempting to separate you from that fortitude.

The truth is that our whole community depends on your ability to turn down offers of personal rewards in favor of our protection.

Those within the FBI who are highly skilled in the preparation and dissemination of disinformation would have you believe that there are "bad Americans" whom you should prey upon through their "target of interest' program.  Fake film, fake photos, edited and misattributed audio, fake messaging, false claims about DNA evidence -- all of these tools are deployed by the FBI in their foray into totalitarian territory.  Deceit is the centerpiece of their efforts.

Yet, these attempts are morally, ethically and legally wrong, and they betray the very fundamentals of our democracy, which insist that we defend the rights of other Americans just as courageously as we defend our own.

Sean, stand strong.  You're important to our country not because of your bank account.  You're important to our country because of your strength of character.  Sometimes that heroism is celebrated, and sometimes it is silent.

But I have to believe it's still there.

Sincerely yours,
Lane MacWilliams

cc: multiple

Sent: July 20, 2022 at 5:44 pm
From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com
To: timothy.smith@falmouthfirema.gov, scott.thrasher@falmouthfirema.gov, chad.absten@falmouthfirema.gov

Gentlemen, I appreciate your allowing me to introduce myself via email. I may have emailed you once last year with regard to arson threats I was receiving at that time, but I feel it is important for me to renew our written dialogue on a current basis.

I stand as an FBI whistleblower regarding corruption of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the FBI's affiliated "target of interest" program.  These are major federal programs which, you may be aware, draw billions of dollars in congressional budget appropriations each and every year.  Unfortunately for all of us, it appears that the FBI has based these programs on rather extensive falsified law enforcement reporting against law-abiding American citizens.  These crimes appear to be widespread enough that they are currently being investigated an an "insider threat" to our democracy within the U.S. Department of Justice and the ODNI.

As I have approached a critical fulfillment of a Freedom of Information Act request which will demonstrate this falsified law enforcement reporting, the threats extended to my family members and myself have escalated.  Among them are extensive threats of both arson and water damage at our family home, where I grew up, in Woods Hole, at 40 Gansett Rd.

There is strong suspicion that FBI affiliates gained recent entry to our home, and I do not currently have information about their actions while in the interior of the house.

Because a major lever of corruption for the FBI is located within payments tendered by Infragard, I wonder if you can tell me whether the Falmouth Fire Department is signatory to Infragard.

Beyond this, have any FBI affiliates and/or employees engaged in communication with Falmouth Fire Department concerning our property?

This is important information for federal investigators with oversight over FBI conduct.

Please be aware that your truthfulness and full disclosure are important.  Any false denial would open up the Department to unwanted liability.

Here in California, we were alarmed to recently discover that the Chief of our local fire district, in addition to the Fire Marshal, had accepted pay as individual Infragard "informants" in return for "cooperation" concerning their actions -- and the actions of their employees -- toward our property.

Obviously, everyone should be attempting to protect life and property at this time.

My needs are no less urgent in this regard than others', and in truth, they are substantively more pressing.

So, with that in mind, I would appreciate your answering the query above.

Thank you very much for your support for our safety and that of our property,
Lane MacWilliams

cc: multiple
Sent: July 25, 2022 at 5:29 pm
From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com
To: timothy.smith@falmouthfirema.gov, scott.thrasher@falmouthfirema.gov, chad.absten@falmouthfirema.gov


Gentlemen, your silence in response to my email of July 20, 2022 confirms for me the likelihood that the 
Falmouth Fire Department, and perhaps key individuals within that Department,  are signatory to Infragard, as has been alleged to me.

Given the extensive arson threats I have received from FBI affiliates, I find these relationships with the FBI and Infragard to be deeply concerning.

Should there be any fire at my home or on my property, the Falmouth Fire Department and its personnel would come under immediate scrutiny from investigators at the federal level, and it's important that you understand this.

All of us should be supporting an outcome in which fire is prevented, and lives and property are protected.

I would appreciate your ongoing cooperation in these aims.

It's worth noting that FBI personnel will advise you to destroy all evidence of your communications with the agency, but you should preserve these records for your own documentation.  

Gentlemen, our democracy is important -- not only in the preservation of our own civil liberties and human rights, but also in defense of the rights of others.

Your honesty and integrity on an individual level matter in that defense.

I encourage you and your Department to hold to your highest principles, even, and especially, when others may be attempting to separate you from that fortitude.

The truth is that our whole community depends on your ability to turn down offers of personal rewards in favor of our protection.

Those within the FBI who are highly skilled in the preparation and dissemination of disinformation would have you believe that there are "bad Americans" whom you should prey upon through their "target of interest' program.  Fake film, fake photos, edited and misattributed audio, fake messaging, false claims about DNA evidence -- all of these tools are deployed by the FBI in their foray into totalitarian territory.  Deceit is the centerpiece of their efforts.

Yet, these attempts are morally, ethically and legally wrong, and they betray the very fundamentals of our democracy, which insist that we defend the rights of other Americans just as courageously as we defend our own.

Gentlemen, stand strong.  You're important to our country not because of your bank account.  You're important to our country because of your strength of character.  Sometimes that heroism is celebrated, and sometimes it is silent.

But I have to believe it's still there.

Sincerely yours,
Lane MacWilliams

cc: multiple

Saturday, July 30, 2022

OIG Hotline: Please Ensure That FBI Informants Attorney Tom Still and Dr. Ben Erickson Uphold the Spirit and Letter of the Law in Maintaining Confidentiality

 OIG Hotline, I am informed that the FBI has intended to allege that Dr. Ben Erickson never received my updated permission letter from Attorney Tom Still -- this, with the intention of disseminating defamatory material through a contact within ODNI.  

Please assist in conveying this threat to the Honorable Avril Haines.  I believe that, in their understanding of their liability, these men can be persuaded to follow an ethical and lawful course.

Thank you very much,

Lane MacWilliams

**********************************************************************************

Email Documentation:

Friday, July 29, 2022 at 2:14 p.m.

From: Lane MacWilliams (lanemacwilliams@gmail.com)

To:  Jennifer Still (JStill@hinshaw-law.com)

cc: Tom Still (tstill@hinshaw-law.com)

Dear Attorney Jennifer Still,

Please find herewith a permission letter which replaces that which I provided to you yesterday.

Due to privacy concerns over the long-term, only the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. DOJ has my permission to speak to Dr. Ben Erickson in an investigative capacity concerning this matter -- no one else.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.

I will fax this material to your office shortly in order to verify your receipt of this material.

I appreciate your forwarding it to Dr. Ben Erickson at your earliest convenience.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter,

Lane MacWilliams

Attachment: BRWDCE99495DF01_003085.pdf

*********************************************************************************

Return email:

Friday, July 29, 2022 at 2:53 p.m.

From: Tom Still (tstill@hinshaw-law.com)

To: Lane MacWilliams (lanemacwilliams@gmail.com)

cc: Jennifer Still (JStill@hinshaw-law.com)


Dear Ms. MacWilliams,

Apologies, but we do not represent Dr. Ben Erickson.  We have never represented him.  Perhaps you should reach out to Dr. Erickson directly.

Thomas E. Still

Hinshaw, Marsh, Still and Hinshaw, LLP, 12901 Saratoga Ave, Saratoga, CA. 95070

**********************************************************************************

Return Email:

Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 2:53 p.m.

From: Lane MacWilliams (lanemacwilliams@gmail.com)

To: Tom Still (tstill@hinshaw-law.com)

cc: Jennifer Still (JStill@hinshaw-law.com)


Tom, with all due respect, I am informed that you have engaged in recent online communications with Dr. Ben Erickson regarding the subject of these permissions, as well as with your FBI handler.

Given these events, I heartily suggest that you forward to Dr. Ben Erickson the replacement documentation I have shared with you.

In the event that a null and void permission is misused to disseminate defamatory information concerning me in the future, both you and your FBI handler, as well as Dr. Ben Erickson and his FBI handler, bear whole and separate liability to me.

Consider this your formal notification that, in the event of such a crime being perpetrated, I will hold you to account, and I will ensure that the California Bar is notified of your deceitful actions as well.

Tom, character and integrity are rather central when it comes to the matter of the FBI's utilization of falsified law enforcement reporting in the corruption of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the FBI's affiliated "target of interest" program.  It is extremely telling to evaluate an attorney's actions in the context of serving as an FBI informant, as you have done in this matter.  How should society respond when an individual who has committed his life to upholding the law choose to violate the rights of another while being compensated by Infragard?  There are some within the U.S. Department of Justice who are attempting to answer this question, a development for which we should all be grateful.  This communication will be copied to those investigators, you should be aware.

I will observe that Attorney Jennifer Still seems to me to be an individual who has conducted herself in a manner that upholds the ethical standards of her profession, and I have appreciated that choice.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

**********************************************************************************

The permission letter herewith is valid and in full force and effect at this time:




Communication with Attorney Virgil Pryor Regarding Dr. Yumi Ando and Dr. Judith Nevitt

Addendum:  Attorney Virgil Pryor has failed to confirm receipt of the faxed communications, below.  As a result, in the event of any inappropriate release of defamatory information into the public sphere, Attorney Pryor and his clients, Yumi Ando and Judith Nevitt, may be held separately and wholly liable.



Transcribed text of emails:

Friday July 29, 2022 at 2:35 p.m.
From: Lane MacWilliams (lanemacwilliams@gmail.com)
To: Virgil Pryor (virgil@orplaw.com)
Re: Replacement Documents for Dr. Yumi Ando and Dr. Judith Nevitt

Dear Attorney Pryor:

Please find herewith two permission letters which replace the documentation I provided to you yesterday.

Du to privacy concerns over the long-term, only the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. DOJ has my permission to speak to Dr. Yumi Ando and Dr. Judith Nevitt in an investigative capacity concerning this matter -- no one else.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns.

I will fax this material to your office shortly in order to verify your receipt of this documentation.

I appreciate your forwarding the attached letters to Dr. Yumi Ando and Dr. Judith Nevitt at your earliest convenience.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter,
Lane MacWilliams

Attachment:  BRWDCE99495DF01_003088.pdf

**********************************************************************************

Saturday, July 30, 2022 at 6:57 p.m.
From: Lane MacWilliams (lanemacwilliams@gmail.com)
To: Virgil Pryor (virgil@orplaw.com)

Dear Attorney Pryor:

Due to an issue which has arisen in Attorney Tom Still's communication with a physician regarding updated permissions, I felt it was incumbent upon me to bring his conduct to the attention of investigators within the DOJ.

Under the circumstances, it would be a good idea for you to verify to me via return email that you have conveyed updated permissions to both Dr. Ando and Dr. Nevitt at this time.

The FBI appears to be extremely anxious regarding exposure of its malfeasance in engaging in falsified law enforcement reporting within the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the affiliated "target of interest" program.  As a result, the agency is seeking ways to discredit me as a whistlblower.

Obviously, there is liability in the efforts of FBI handlers and informants who accede to such unlawful schemes.  It would be best for everyone if honesty and integrity were maintained through open, transparent, and prompt communication regarding this issue.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter,
Lane MacWilliams

***********************************************************************************



Details to Assist the OIG Hotline in the Investigation of the FBI's "Target of Interest" Program

 July 30, 2022

 

To the Office of the Inspector General Hotline, Investigations Division:

 

On the chance you are able to speak to some of the physicians to whom I have provided permissions, I would like to share a few details that may assist questioning.

 

1.     Why did I mention the existence of my stalker to Dr. DL?

 

One day, while checking out of Dr. L’s Office, one of the receptionists appeared to be making an appointment with a new patient over the phone.  She asked the patient to spell his name, after which she repeated the spelling:  X-X-X-N-D-A-N.  This is an unusual spelling of the name – and the spelling of the first name of my stalker.  At the time, I was concerned that my stalker may be aware of who my doctor was, where his office was, etc.  I was genuinely worried for the safety of the office staff and physicians, so I expressed my concerns to Dr. L and Dr. P.  I told them in general terms that I did have a stalker with the first name of an apparent new patient of theirs – and recounted what happened in the lobby of their practice.  I refused to share my stalker’s last name for liability reasons.  (My stalker is reported to be a malignant narcissist who is apparently gratified by accusing his victims of his own crimes.  I did not intend to be accused by him of slander and defamation, so I refused to share his last name.)

 

In retrospect, I can see that this was a fairly cynical set-up in which my benevolence and good faith were used against me.  I was trying to protect the very physician who was preying upon me for pay from Infragard – at my stalker’s direction.

 

Dr. L asked whether I had reported my stalker to the authorities, and I told him I had.

 

But I never mentioned the details of that reporting, the name of Sheriff’s Deputy Rick Chaput, or the contents of my complaint.  I shared no specifics.

 

Likewise, with Sheriff’s Deputy Rick Chaput, I never mentioned my doctor DL.

 

The only way in which Dr. L would have been able to add a falsified contribution to Case Report #19-11840 is through the coordination of the FBI.  This particular doctor and this particular Sheriff’s Deputy would  never have known each other otherwise.

 

2.      How did Dr. L attempt to explain the harm he caused me during surgery on December 26, 2019?  He told other physicians that I had an A-frame deformity prior to surgery – a blatant falsehood.  Then he altered my in-office photos to add shadowing indicating this asymmetry.

 

I include a photo herewith for OIG Hotline investigators to show that I had no such deformity prior to surgery:



 

The attempt of the surgeon to lie in this manner is stunning, in my opinion.  The cynicism and premeditation involved in these acts – the contempt for his patient – the group predation – all of it.  Suffice it to say that these acts do not represent the professional and ethical standards we expect all physicians to be upholding.  Many laws were broken by this man.  Many laws were broken by his partner, Dr. P, who attempted to cover Dr. L’s malfeasance.

 

It is difficult to view such “gang stalking” as acceptable on any level.

 

3.      Why was there the effort to communicate a more serious pathogen through Dr. WV, and, more recently, the medical personnel at PAMF?

 

My stalker describes himself as possessing a sadistic drive.  In other words, he finds it gratifying to cause harm to good and innocent people.

 

He has expressed to me that he has engaged repeatedly and extensively in the intentional transmission of his HIV virus to otherwise healthy people. (My husband and I did report this allegation, among others, to the FBI agent to whom we spoke at Oakland, CA FBI Headquarters on February 21, 2020 – but this agent is reported to have falsified the resulting report and suppressed the investigation of my stalker.)

 

Perhaps my stalker believed that his false assertions that I had had many intimate partners would be bolstered by an HIV diagnosis.

 

Honestly, it is extremely difficult to grasp the psychological illness that would lead someone to prey upon others in this manner.

 

To imagine complicity on the part of local and federal law enforcement officers with someone like my stalker is – a far reach.

 

Most reasonable people are simply not going to give credence to the idea that such malevolence exists.

 

I’m one of those reasonable people.  It took me a long time to accept that certain employees and affiliates of the FBI are preying upon “targets of interest” in the medical realm.

 

4.     On September 15, 2019, I spontaneously stopped by the medical office of Dr. Ian Kroes, because I realized that my own physician, Yumi Ando, was not appropriately meeting my medical needs due to professional compromise through the FBI/Infragard.

 

I sought to replace her as my concierge physician.  The office staff told me that Dr. Kroes was accepting new patients and that the Office Manager, Sabina Schnapek, would be delighted to see me the following day.

 

The office shared with me Dr. Kroes’ fee structure, which seemed like something I could afford, though I don’t recall the specific dollar amounts now.

 

The next day, on September 16, 2019, the Office Manager Sabina Schnapek explained to me that she had spoken with Yumi Ando about my being there, and that Yumi Ando had expressed that I was in some manner “troubled” or “dishonest.”

 

It bears stating that Yumi Ando would have had no means of knowing that I had visited Dr. Kroes’ office without active surveillance and harassment of those acting in a criminal capacity within the FBI/Infragard.

 

Ms. Schnapek stated that Dr. Kroes was not accepting new patients – a lie.  And she mentioned a fee structure that was far outside of my price range, in direct conflict with what I had been told the day before.

 

Again, this represents predatory gang stalking as perpetrated by the FBI.

 

I just need to observe that to obstruct a patient’s medical care is dangerous.  This type of action opens myriad liability concerns.  In a democratic society, citizens should have access to private and safe medical care delivered through a physician in whom they trust.  All of these standards were violated in this circumstance when I was prevented from obtaining proper care when I sought to become a patient of Dr. Kroes.

 

My own physician, Yumi Ando, needed to possess the moral reference frame to tell the FBI to cease and desist.  Instead, she took pay to do their bidding by perpetrating unwarranted slander and defamation.

 

I can personally attest that such failures of character are deeply disheartening.


5.  Physician Ben Erickson is reported to have defamed me to myriad physicians, including Judith Nevitt, Tayyeba Ali, Jackson Lau, Ann Jarayam, and Jordan Piluek.  It's notable that I never mentioned to Dr. Erickson that I intended to consult with any of the physicians listed above.  


Instead, the manner in which Dr. Erickson learned of my consults with these doctors was through direct contact with his FBI handler, who subsequently instructed him in a plan of slander and defamation toward me.  And, let's not forget to mention, Dr. Erickson committed these crimes for purported remuneration from Infragard.  


Does this sound ethical to anyone?  Does it sound lawful?  Does it sound Constitutional?  


No, my friends.  


No, on all counts.

 

6..     Attorney Nick Heimlich is reported to have slandered and defamed me to Attorneys Peter Schlueter and Christopher Bou-Saeed, as well as many other attorneys I attempted to consult. (The appropriate permissions for the OIG Hotline will be forthcoming.)

 

Neither Mr. Schlueter nor Mr. Bou-Saeed were willing to answer my email queries about their communications with Mr. Heimlich.  Nobody wanted to be disbarred for violating the fundamental requirements of attorney/client privilege.

 

But I did not mention any of these attorneys to one another.  Mr. Heimlich had no way of knowing that I had contacted Mr. Schlueter and Mr. Bou-Saeed except through the FBI/Infragard.

 

Clearly, for the FBI to obstruct a law-abiding client’s impartial legal advocacy is unconstitutional.  

 

I am told this is a standard element of the FBI’s “target of interest”program, resulting in the fact that “targets of interest” have not yet been able to defend themselves from this type of predation in a court of law.

 

7.     My stalker has sent me numerous quotes recently through the Pegasus hack of my iPhone claiming that “those who did you wrong are telling a different version of the story and claiming to be the victim,” “those who know they wronged you are obsessed with discrediting you,” “when they cannot find anything wrong with you, they create it,” – and more.

 

I have learned over time that malignant narcissists “project” their own crimes onto their victims.  Malignant narcissists who are stalkers accuse their victims of stalking behavior.  Then they consciously set out to create behavior in their victims that could be wrongly interpreted in that manner.

 

As an example, Attorney Lior Zorea repeatedly asked me to “check on” my stalker’s well-being by “making a big public display” of concern for him.

 

He suggested that I bring food to my stalker’s house, which I would never have done.

 

He suggested that I send lingerie to my stalker in the mail, which I would never have done.

 

He explained to me that my stalker, as a gigolo, had two “price ranges” for customers.  In other words, he attempted to serve as a pimp for my stalker.  I made clear to Mr. Zorea that under no circumstances was I going to be a “customer” of my stalker.

 

Mr. Zorea committed many other deceits beyond these, but it is possible through this brief list to perceive a concerted attempt at a fairly elaborate set-up.

 

Clearly, the men involved in gang stalking programs are enjoying certain group aspects of their predation, attempting to derail the lives of virtuous American citizens (“targets”) in a manner that brings them gratification while reassuring themselves of their power over others.

 

As general commentary, I will just observe that the “target of interest” program is hugely expensive.  The payoffs through Infragard appear to be highly motivating to “informants” – and American citizens appear to be easily duped by the sort of disinformation the FBI is peddling.  FBI personnel are highly experienced in prevarication.  They appear to be able to make innocent American citizens appear to be heinous criminals if they do not comply with the agency’s starkly totalitarian objectives.

 

In such an environment, the Freedom of Information Act should be liberally, determinedly upheld.

 

The average citizen has no hope of defending herself against false accusations extended in secret by federal agents.  “Targets of interest” have no idea what is being said about them when they are slandered and defamed by those in a position of authority.

 

All of these actions are clearly unconstitutional.

 

It is secrecy which allows these crimes to be perpetrated by the FBI, in direct and ongoing subversion of our democracy.

 

Who will defend law-abiding American citizens in this matter against the clearly anti-democratic predations of the FBI/Infragard in embodying a de facto “secret police” which demands total compliance from the public?

 

I do not believe that falsified law enforcement reporting should be allowed to remain concealed, either within Case Report #19-11840 or at the federal level.

 

It’s disconcerting enough that the FBI pays informants for false reporting – but it’s devastating that the agency follows this by further falsifying and notarizing reports within its auspices in a process entirely internal to the agency.


Someone has to have the courage to expose this lawlessness.

 

If the Freedom of Information Act had been properly upheld, the FBI would never have been able to manifest corruption of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the “target of interest” program.

 

Now, our entire democracy in under threat from the very men who have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution.

 

In response, there should be an assertive commitment to fulfill FOIA requests in nearly all circumstances.

 

Recently, my stalker has been offering to render me a “kajillionaire” if I will only allow my FOIA request to be fulfilled by accepting redacted materials.

 

He has also asserted that withholding the fake AI-generated film or films co-opting my likeness, with which the FBI has so liberally and viciously defamed me for the last several years, would be “better for everyone.”

 

Not for me.

 

These lies have been disseminated nationally through federal information-sharing programs HSIN, N-DEx and/or LEEP.  But it is somehow “better for everyone” if the victim herself does not have access to them?

 

That does not sound like democracy to me.

 

That sounds utterly and completely dystopian.

 

And further, I must ask, is it really in the interests of the United States to allow a human trafficker, the head of a far-right militia, and a ranking member of Russian-affiliated organized crime to be deciding what is “better for everyone” in this country?

 

Maybe elected officials could be deciding what is “better for everyone” in support of our democracy instead?

 

Perhaps due process of law could be involved?

 

Perhaps the Freedom of Information Act could be upheld as part of that due process of law?

 

These observations are the ABC-song of democracy.  They’re not an opera by Verdi.  If we don’t know the tune, we must listen to those who do.

 

Falsified law enforcement reporting cannot persist alongside American democracy.  They are incompatible with one another – wholly, completely, resolutely opposed.

 

Perhaps the FBI has really and truly deconstructed our Constitution, and there’s no going back.  Perhaps the lack of fulfillment of my FOIA request bears that out.

 

The good people within the OIG Hotline make me feel that may not have transpired quite yet.

 

Their determined investigators make me believe there may be others who are as committed to illuminating the truth of this matter as I.

 

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams