My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Wednesday, February 18, 2026

Emails to the OIG Hotline on February 18, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your attention today, February 18, 2026:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signed Testaments, February 18, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 2:32 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: LM Video, sent at 4:15 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for your ... ; sent at 6:05 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 6:10 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, February 18, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:22 PM Pacific time.

The Just Response to the FBI's Predation Toward America's Children

 Sent to the attention of the OIG Hotline within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com at 4:15 PM Pacific time:


OIG Hotline, please download the attached file if you are able to do so close to the time of sending, at 4:00 PM Pacific time today, February 18, 2026.  The FBI only needs 2-3 hours to create credible AI-generated video, so the chances of falsification of this material increase with longer time duration prior to your access.

This documentation should immediately refute any false claims of lack of cogency or stability being put forward by the FBI.

For the record, I have never threatened anyone, nor will I.  I do think it is permissible for me to disapprove of the men within the FBI who are responsible for trafficking my sons and daughter-in-law repeatedly.  Indeed, my older son is being forced to attend "David's BBQ" by his handler today, entirely against his will.  Expressions of disbelief, frustration, anger and outrage over the ongoing harm of my children is not only understandable, it is necessary.  I do express my feelings regarding these predators when I am alone in my own home, refusing to burden others with my indignance over these appalling choices by others.  This is my right, and I refuse to relinquish it.

The FBI should never ask the victims of its torture for silence, nor should it dare to ask the parents of FBI torture victims for silence.

Silence is acquiescence in this unacceptable hostage-taking, and I do not acquiesce.

Unlike the FBI, I believe in the rule of law, in due process, in restorative justice, and in peaceable dialogue.

Until I have access to those luxuries, I am free to raise my voice in my own home, and I will not be apologizing for my access to that freedom.

Is it right to feel outrage about the FBI's repeated rape, trafficking, torture, and sovereignty violations of America's children?  It is.

Would we be worthy human beings if we didn't?  No.

Could we possibly restore our worthy nation without outrage over these crimes by the FBI?  Absolutely not.

So, we must be exceptionally careful that the torturers are not authorized to silence those they have so egregiously wronged.

Torturers do apparently feel shame when publicly exposed for their crimes.  That's good!  We can wield the FBI's shame over this issue to the great benefit of the nation; and if we fail to do so, we are remiss.

OIG Hotline, I am a peaceable person.  But no one should view the repeated rape of her children as a peaceable act.

And none of us should ask Americans to be impassive, silent, disinterested, acquiescent, or neutral about this matter.

Americans should shout about it.  Americans should rage about it.  Americans should seek legal redress regarding it.  And Americans should make sure it doesn't ruin the nation, as our adversaries would prefer.

Thank you for allowing me to express these most serious concerns.

Most sincerely,



Lane MacWilliams


Video for Immediate Access By the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see a critical communication as soon as possible within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com with the following  subject heading: 

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: LM Video, sent at 4:15 PM Pacific time.
I will shortly publish on my blog the content of the email accompanying this documentation.

Most sincerely,



Lane Macwilliams

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Emails to the OIG Hotline on February 17, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office today, February 17, 2026.  Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day.

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Unusual Dissemination, February 17, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:19 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Armando of Ishmael Stucco, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:32 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:13 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: WWF Donation, sent at 11:39 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Gathering Information and Waiting for Appropriate Safeguards, sent at 3:19 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: MacWilliams' Family Health Update, February 17, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:38 PM and 8:42 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, February 17, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:02 PM Pacific time.

Monday, February 16, 2026

On President's Day

1.  Today is President's Day, and I would like to hear your reflections on the occasion.

Answer:  It's much more accurate today to understand the Presidency as a role of power-sharing with others.

2.  Are you referencing the U.S. Congress?

Answer:  Not in this case.  I'm not discussing the separation of powers so much as the influence of the FBI, CIA, DoD and others over the decisions that appear to originate with the President.

The Presidency is still a remarkably powerful position, but there are many hidden influences of which we need to be increasingly aware.

3.  Are there still divided factions within the FBI and CIA, politically speaking?

Answer:  There have been numerous purges of the FBI and CIA, attempting to ensure unanimity among the personnel of these agencies on a political basis.  

But we still have former Presidents who are directing loyalists within these agencies, remarkably enough.

4.  How do you view those realities?

Answer:  Both former Presidents and sitting Presidents are concerned about their lasting legacies.  But we don't want to see those concerns translate into directives to harm the innocent.  

5.  What if there are Presidents, either former or sitting, who are concerned about the documentation of their actions regarding your case?

Answer:  I hope they would send a peaceable emissary to speak with me.  If anyone feels that he needs to explain conduct in a particular context, then that honorable outreach should be able to occur without violating ethics.  Otherwise, in the event that silence is maintained, my life is placed at needless risk.

6.  Why is that the result of silence?

Answer:  Right now, the FBI, CIA, and their affiliates have been proven to be perpetrating knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public.  So, the agencies are fearful of exposure of these corrupt programs, and they would rather silence any detractors.  Because of this dynamic, the FBI will encourage current and former Presidents to gravitate to violence over and above communication.

7.  Do the current and former Presidents have the ability to make a different choice?

Answer:  Most certainly, they do.  Anyone who cares about the long term future of human rights within the United States, and among all those we influence, will want to ensure that my case is resolved to my satisfaction.

8.  Why?

Answer:  Because I am a profoundly loyal, insightful, and dedicated advocate for the long term sovereignty of the American people and the nation as a whole.

9.  Do you feel that false reporting about your family is accelerating right now?

Answer:  I do.  Yes.

10.  For what reason?

Answer:  There appears to be more fear surrounding documentation to be provided to the Smithsonian Institution regarding my case.  So this may be one of the primary motivations.

11.  And the other would be financial?

Answer:  Yes.  If the FBI can wrongfully accuse me of being a felon, which I am not, then the agency can steal funds that have been set aside under my name and identity in recognition of the critical importance of the long term sovereignty of Americans.  So, the FBI and its affiliates have a clear focus on that goal for themselves, contrary to all the interests of the American public.

12.  How can you best defend against wrongful accusations against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  With courage and vigor and determination on a daily basis.

13.  Can the United States right its course regarding knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer:  Only when we reach the point of agreeing that lying by law enforcement does not serve our national security interests.

14.  You have said that you would welcome honorable outreach that provides you with documentation regarding your case, as well as meaningful dialogue about these critical issues.

Answer:  I certainly would.

15.  Today, on President's Day, what message would you wish to convey to our Presidents, both current and former?

Answer:  I would wish to convey that I am worthy of the truth within documentation regarding this case, not because I believe all of it should be rendered public, but because I will ensure that it be dedicated to the greatest good for the nation.

Our Presidents genuinely care about the United States, and accordingly, they will want to ensure that my case makes the greatest difference possible to the sovereignty of Americans in the long term.

16.  You want to safeguard funds awarded to you, because you know they can made a critical difference to the future of the nation.  Is that a truthful statement?

Answer:  Quite so.  I want to be directly involved in the decisions that will determine the future of human rights, and that means the funds need to be there.

17.  Are your sons still being pressed to sign knowingly false statements regarding your family?

Answer:  Regularly.

18.  Daily?

Answer:  Close to it.

19.  Can you continue to insist that they attest to the truth?

Answer:  There is tremendous pressure on them, but yes, I am endeavoring to insist that they be allowed to speak the truth of our family, now and in the future.

20.  Will you please keep us informed about how your family members are feeling, given the astonishing circumstances in which you find yourself?

Answer:  Of course, I will.

21.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline on February 16, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see my email communications to your Office today, February 16, 2026.  This list will be updated throughout the day:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Ensuring Truthfulness in Communications, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:53 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for our phone conversation today; Conditionally Confidential, sent at 4:36 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 5:22 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: A Few Details to Considers; Conditionally Confidential, sent at 5:43 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Your Donation Receipt from Humane Society Silicon Valley, sent at 6:51 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd:  Amazon Delivery to Front Door, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:25 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: GTM Texts, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:39 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, February 16, 2026, sent at 11:27 PM Pacific time.





Sunday, February 15, 2026

In an Era of Falsehood, What Does It Mean to Honor Our Parents?

 In a time of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting about all living Americans, what does it mean when the FBI reaches back to defame the dead?

In my own case, in which the FBI appears to now be engaging in the ignoble business of defaming my deceased parents, it means the agency has been caught in some rather appalling lies about an honorable American family, and they don't want to accept accountability for the years-long deceit of the DOJ, the Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court.

Yet, when I speak about my parents, I honor them by speaking the truth.

My father was a deeply courteous person, kind, stoic, adventurous, brilliant, wise, determined, courageous, and virtuous.  His presence was like a mountain, or the sea, or the truth.  You could count on it.  There was something monumental in his character, and this quality made people desire to be in his company, to speak with him, to ask his opinion, to follow his guidance.

His standards were impossibly high, but you wanted to meet them, to exceed them, to earn this noble person's admiration, to call him your good friend.

And my mother?

My mother was a force of nature:  gifted, knowing, a fierce advocate for the vulnerable, a sacred person.  Music followed her everywhere she went.  So did books, flowers, adoring children, school teachers, opera singers, scientists, politicians, and ministers.  My mother was not only the life of the party.  She was life itself.  She judged others not on the basis of their power, but on the basis of their hearts and minds and intent. My mother was accustomed to doing the impossible so frequently that others began to expect it of her.  I know I did. 

You wanted to be by her side to see what would happen next.  Because it was going to be astonishing, and it was going to be miraculous, and it was going to change your life.

Once, a stranger followed her through an airport, demanding an autograph.

"You're somebody!  You're somebody!" the woman insisted.

"Yes, I am somebody," my mother laughed.

My parents were formidable people, leaders, people who changed their part of the world by walking into it.  They were determined to make a positive difference for others, and they did.

And now, I stand in defense of their memories.

Richard Pierre Von Herzen and Janice Elaine Von Herzen.

Thank you for your irreplaceable kindness, courage, integrity, discovery, art, inspiration, depth, brilliance, insight, leadership, and teaching.

Thank you for your goodness.

Thank you for the soulfulness that informed your accomplishments.

Thank you for your ever-present belief in your daughter.

Your wisdom still guides me every day of my life.

That's a legacy that I hope will make a difference to countless others.

I honor you with the truth about your lives, and that honor will continue.

I cannot be paid or threatened to abandon it, because the truth about your lives cannot be killed or suppressed or betrayed.

So, too, the truth about the living cannot be killed or suppressed or betrayed.

Good Americans, do we need the FBI's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting in order to diminish what we know about one another?

No, we do not.

Does the FBI need to maintain its programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting in order to meet its mission and objectives?

Again, no.

Will our future be elevated, enriched, or expanded because we allowed the FBI to gratuitously defame the living and the dead, our neighbors, friends, family, and associates?

In no measure.

The truth does not have to be a casualty of this moment in history, nor does our insistence on our own virtue, or our gratitude toward those who came before us.

So, I invite the FBI's South Bay Chief of Station to a conversation about my honorable parents.  A peaceable conversation.  A respectful conversation. And one in which his accountants explain themselves.

Our origins cannot be reduced to institutional defamation, desecration of property, or diminishment of the leaders among us.

And while not all truths must be spoken at all times, this one does.

An abandonment of our parents' virtue is nothing less than an abandonment of our own.

For if we cannot speak to their own goodness, who, then, will speak for ours?

Lane MacWilliams