1. You found out what the "midterm surprise" was yesterday, didn't you?
Answer: I believe so.
2. How did that come about?
Answer: It seemed that my right to vote might be treated as a "test case" for a much larger perpetration of false claims of voter fraud nationally.
The State of California was directed by the U.S. Department of Justice to audit voting rolls concerning a list of names provided by the DOJ, and to do so within two days.
And it seemed that the federal government intended to disqualify those voters whose names were listed.
3. Was your name on that list?
Answer: I don't have that information, unfortunately.
But in an effort to learn more about my own access to a lawful voting process, I started asking questions of my county voting registrar's office, and the responses were, from my perspective, alarmingly insufficient, incomplete and dishonest.
Ultimately, it became quite clear through my dialogue with the county voting registrar that I was not likely to have access to participation in a free and fair election.
At that point, and with a great deal of regret, I felt it was necessary to withdraw my voter registration.
To be clear, this is not an action I recommend to anyone else. I think Americans should be registered to vote, and I think they should exercise their lawful right to vote at every opportunity.
4. Yet, you felt the withdrawal of your own voter registration might help other voters?
Answer: I did. Because I have filed a complaint with the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, the California Department of Justice and the California Secretary of State over this matter.
Given that there was a demand from the U.S. Attorney General to the state of California for an audit of voter rolls on short notice, along with a threat to follow up with federal investigators, it seemed that this could represent a much larger plan nationwide to disrupt the voting process.
If enough votes are disqualified through these proceedings, then the outcome of the midterms will be altered. And, no doubt, this is the intent.
5. You made the point yesterday that you believe the FBI, and subsequently the U.S. DOJ, accessed state voter rolls unlawfully. How did that occur?
Answer: It seems that, when many states refused to provide statewide voter rolls to the federal government when this was originally demanded a number of years ago, the FBI bypassed state Attorneys General and Secretaries of State and went directly to the County Voting Registrars, where the agency obtained the information through allegations of a "national security" prerogative. So the federal government has the information, though not through legal means. Further, the federal government appears to have identified the voters it wishes to disqualify. Likely, the Attorney General intends to give notification of required voter audits to numerous states, after which it will declare the response insufficient and commence an investigation intended to disqualify large numbers of honorable American voters.
6. So, can this scheme be halted in advance?
Answer: That's what we're about to find out.
7. What is the role of the DMV in the falsification of voters' names and addresses for the County Voting Registrars?
Answer: The DMV seems to be "updating" voters names and addresses with inserted errors and conveying those errors to the County Voting Registrars as though Americans are regularly re-registering to vote.
In some cases, the DMV appears to be misspelling addresses on driver's licenses with the explanation that these constitute DMV abbreviations, which is not the case.
8. And is all of this occurring at the direction of the FBI?
Answer: It seems to be, yes. These initiatives appear to be driven by the three-letter agencies. I do find it concerning that there is an allegation that Europeans are being affected by similar manipulations of their names and addresses, and that their own elections are being distorted by the same stratagems. This would imply CIA involvement, certainly. So, this is a problem that may well overflow our national borders. If this is even a remote possibility, I would think that the United Nations should be informed of this issue as soon as possible.
9. You have filed complaints about this matter, so are you prohibited from discussing this case publicly?
Answer: My public commentary may be the only means I have of thoroughly illuminating this issue for the wider nation and the wider world, so I think there is a necessity to talk about this to the extent that we can solve the issue together.
When Americans participate in free and fair elections, they are exercising their sovereignty, which our Constitution characterizes as inalienable. That is to say, our Constitution asserts that as human beings, we are born free and that our freedom is inseparable from our lives and our national character.
So we don't want to forfeit that sovereignty through silence, omission, inaction or fear.
We need to work together to support one another's sovereign rights as vigorously as we defend our own, That's what our freedom depends on -- our understanding that we cannot be free unless our neighbors are also free.
10. What is it about the United States that gives you hope for human sovereignty over the long term?
Answer: Americans have a great deal of courage and independence woven into our national identity. I think we possess a fundamental sense of fairness and equity that requires us to defend one another in difficult circumstances. I think we're generous, I think we're engaged, I think we're resilient, I think we're inquisitive, I think we're innovative, and I think we're insightful. All of this is extremely hopeful when it comes to the preservation of United States sovereignty.
On top of all of those gifts, I think we can fight our way out of a corner to miraculous degree.
So, we have reason to engage vigorously with these concerns regarding our fundamental freedoms.
11. Can we successfully do so?
Answer: I wouldn't be here if we couldn't succeed. I wouldn't be holding this torch if the path could not be illuminated. I wouldn't be sounding this clarion call if I did not think we could answer.
12. What do you imagine yourself doing on November 3, 2026?
Answer: I imagine myself bringing water, food, and encouragement to people who are waiting in line to cast their ballots. I don't know whether that's legal to do in all states, but that's what I would most like to do.
13. Will you please keep in close communication with us regarding this remarkable concern of false claims of voter fraud originating with the federal government?
Answer: Of course, yes.
14. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen
