1. What are your thoughts about the so-called "evidence" Txx Lxxxx and the FBI continue to throw before various courts regarding the harms they themselves perpetrated against your properties?
Answer: It's exceptionally easy to malign people who are not present to defend themselves. The FBI has been creating fake DNA evidence for years, apparently. In general, judges do not know the extent of the FBI's capabilities in this realm. So, the FBI just treats courtrooms as a playground in which they are making up the games, the rules, the players, the whole narrative.
And if I defend myself publicly, in this forum, I will be accused of disclosing confidential information -- confidential information used in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting to which I have been objecting as a human rights advocate for the last eight years.
It's not that the system is merely unfair.
It's designed to convict the wrong people.
And we have seen many examples of this within the Black community, when corrupt law enforcement officials submitted fake evidence to courts in order to guarantee rapid convictions, which ultimately were overturned.
So, the FBI has been working in this realm, with very clear objectives.
2. What are those objectives?
Answer: The FBI wants to be able to accuse any American of any crime at any given moment and have confidence that they can dictate the outcome. That's totalitarianism, and it has been advancing within the American judicial system for years.
Michael German has written convincingly about the FBI's "criminalization of black identity."
And, of course, the FBI has criminalized all "targets of interest" through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.
3. How can the FBI be getting away with these crimes of false reporting?
Answer: I've discussed this before, but fundamentally, federal law enforcement officers are obligated to tell the truth, but national security officers are not. The FBI is now defining itself primarily as a national security agency.
4. Can our national sovereignty survive a lying FBI?
Answer: No, it cannot. We can have no illusions about this point. It's not just that the FBI has lied to and about me. It has also lied to Congress, to the DOJ, to the U.S. military, to the Executive Branch, to the Supreme Court, and to the American people in deploying fades against our leadership and a substantive part of the American public.
So, no. We will have no sovereignty as long as the FBI is allowed to lie. The tools the agency is currently wielding are too powerful. If allowed to persist, the FBI will prevail over all wisdom, reason, judgment and goodwill.
5. Is there any determination on the part of our leadership to alter the FBI's current course?
Answer: I cannot imagine that our leadership would not be furious over the FBI's conduct regarding the fade deployments.
How will that pushback weigh in the balance with the FBI's mission and objectives currently?
We will see.
Often throughout history we have seen that psychopathic institutions push their advantage when they have determined that they are needed and cannot be easily replaced.
6. How will history remember the FBI?
Answer: How, indeed? A primary question on the minds of the FBI leadership is whether history can be suppressed through acts of first-degree murder. Can history be killed, in other words? The FBI believes it can, but I think their hubris on this point, as on many others, is misplaced.
7. What about your documentation within the Smithsonian Institution? Will it be preserved within Smithsonian auspices for Americans in perpetuity?
Answer: I don't know. As with so much about this case, I am acting on good faith in the hope that the Smithsonian has, at my directive, been granted an independent endowment, and further, that crucial information about this case will be preserved for the public to assess.
8. What is the answer to resolving the FBI's crimes against your properties, and related crimes against your family members and yourself?
Answer: The FBI has claimed secrecy surrounding its crimes against my properties, and I have explained that that means the agency doesn't have license to present false accusations in concealed court proceedings to wrongfully argue for my family members' deaths or my own.
The FBI cannot have it both ways. It cannot ask me to protect information regarding its malfeasance while still falsely accusing us at every turn.
9. Who is able to place those boundaries into effect for the FBI? Who is in charge of the guardrails?
Answer: Not many people, and I would venture to say they all have suffered sovereignty violations over time. Any person who wields some form of authority over the FBI, and I include myself in this statement, has suffered from fade deployments.
Basically, the FBI has been unwilling to concede to any outer controls or limitations from American leadership.
10. Now, will the agency be forced to withdraw its false accusations against you and your family members?
Answer: I would like to see it happen immediately, yes.
11. Will the agency be forced to withdraw all fade deployments from American leadership and the American people?
Answer: This would be the best possible outcome of these revelations. I hope our leaders insist on that withdrawal and I hope they won't relent until it is verifiably accomplished.
12. Will you please keep us updated with regard to your family's wellbeing and your own?
Answer: Certainly.
13. Will you please let us know whether you are being treated honorably and respectfully in your current residence in Aura Flagstaff, Arizona?
Answer: Of course.
14. Thank you for speaking with us tonight.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams