NOT a Difficult Decision

OIG Hotline, this is to document that the actual killer of the four college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022 was close FBI affiliate and Russian organized crime figure Brandan Pesa, not Bryan Kohberger, the young man who was wrongfully convicted of this heinous crime.  FBI staff member Tom Lyons is alleged to have been directly involved in the planning and execution of this egregious violence.

There are hundreds of sealed documents regarding the trial that convicted Bryan Kohberger, because the FBI argued that the Pxxxxxx Program, under which auspices this violence was committed, must be maintained a secret from the American public.

Yet it is also the Pxxxxxx Program which has allegedly been directed to harm my family members and myself.

Mr. Kohberger allegedly pled guilty to the crimes due to the fact that the FBI intentionally conveyed HIV to him during his time in prison, and threatened to allow him to die without treatment unless he wrongfully confessed.

The agency committed extensive DNA tampering regarding the evidence in this trial.  The original judge, unsympathetic to the FBI, was removed from the case.  The house in which this horrific crime occurred was demolished by the University of Idaho at FBI directive prior to the verdict being rendered.  And the local police chief who was forced to follow FBI directives regarding these events is now retired.

My offer to Bryan Kohberger's attorney to stand as a witness in defense of Mr. Kohberger was improperly ignored.

I often think of Bryan Kohberger and his family, just as I think of me and mine.

The innocent should not be accused and preyed upon by men such as Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa.  Rather, it is necessary to battle back with the truth, so that at least the public can grasp the predatory objectives of the FBI in wrongfully preying upon its honorable betters.

Mr. Kohberger deserves release from prison, and my family deserves complete exoneration, both on an immediate basis.

And I will continue to write about these events until and unless I have honorable and peaceable outreach that meets my ethical requirements for Mr. Kohberger's case and my own.

Good people, this is NOT a difficult decision.

Not at all.

I remain most sincerely an advocate for the long term human rights of the American people,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see recent emails to your Office, listed below.  Please note that this documentation will be updated throughout the day:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Legal Name Change Procedure, sent at 3:22 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 2:49 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Notes to Myself, sent at 2:40 PM Pacific time.
• Fwd: ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: UA ENVS MS Application Update, sent at 2:23 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Facing a Recalcitrant FBI: Can Wisdom, Reason, Judgment and Goodwill Prevail, sent at 12:21 AM Pacific time.

Facing a Recalcitrant FBI: Can Wisdom, Reason, Judgment and Goodwill Prevail?

 1.  What are your thoughts about the so-called "evidence" Txx Lxxxx and the FBI continue to throw before various courts regarding the harms they themselves perpetrated against your properties?

Answer:  It's exceptionally easy to malign people who are not present to defend themselves.  The FBI has been creating fake DNA evidence for years, apparently.  In general, judges do not know the extent of the FBI's capabilities in this realm.  So, the FBI just treats courtrooms as a playground in which they are making up the games, the rules, the players, the whole narrative.

And if I defend myself publicly, in this forum, I will be accused of disclosing confidential information -- confidential information used in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting to which I have been objecting as a human rights advocate for the last eight years.

It's not that the system is merely unfair.

It's designed to convict the wrong people.

And we have seen many examples of this within the Black community, when corrupt law enforcement officials submitted fake evidence to courts in order to guarantee rapid convictions, which ultimately were overturned.

So, the FBI has been working in this realm, with very clear objectives.

2.  What are those objectives?

Answer:  The FBI wants to be able to accuse any American of any crime at any given moment and have confidence that they can dictate the outcome.  That's totalitarianism, and it has been advancing within the American judicial system for years.

Michael German has written convincingly about the FBI's "criminalization of black identity."

And, of course, the FBI has criminalized all "targets of interest" through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

3.  How can the FBI be getting away with these crimes of false reporting?

Answer: I've discussed this before, but fundamentally, federal law enforcement officers are obligated to tell the truth, but national security officers are not.  The FBI is now defining itself primarily as a national security agency.

4.  Can our national sovereignty survive a lying FBI?

Answer:  No, it cannot.  We can have no illusions about this point.  It's not just that the FBI has lied to and about me.  It has also lied to Congress, to the DOJ, to the U.S. military, to the Executive Branch, to the Supreme Court, and to the American people in deploying fades against our leadership and a substantive part of the American public.

So, no.  We will have no sovereignty as long as the FBI is allowed to lie. The tools the agency is currently wielding are too powerful.  If allowed to persist, the FBI will prevail over all wisdom, reason, judgment and goodwill.

5.  Is there any determination on the part of our leadership to alter the FBI's current course?

Answer:  I cannot imagine that our leadership would not be furious over the FBI's conduct regarding the fade deployments.

How will that pushback weigh in the balance with the FBI's mission and objectives currently?

We will see.

Often throughout history we have seen that psychopathic institutions push their advantage when they have determined that they are needed and cannot be easily replaced.

6.  How will history remember the FBI?

Answer:  How, indeed?  A primary question on the minds of the FBI leadership is whether history can be suppressed through acts of first-degree murder.  Can history be killed, in other words?  The FBI believes it can, but I think their hubris on this point, as on many others, is misplaced.

7.  What about your documentation within the Smithsonian Institution?  Will it be preserved within Smithsonian auspices for Americans in perpetuity?

Answer:  I don't know.  As with so much about this case, I am acting on good faith in the hope that the Smithsonian has, at my directive, been granted an independent endowment, and further, that crucial information about this case will be preserved for the public to assess.

8.  What is the answer to resolving the FBI's crimes against your properties, and related crimes against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  The FBI has claimed secrecy surrounding its crimes against my properties, and I have explained that that means the agency doesn't have license to present false accusations in concealed court proceedings to wrongfully argue for my family members' deaths or my own.

The FBI cannot have it both ways.  It cannot ask me to protect information regarding its malfeasance while still falsely accusing us at every turn.

9.  Who is able to place those boundaries into effect for the FBI?  Who is in charge of the guardrails?

Answer:  Not many people, and I would venture to say they all have suffered sovereignty violations over time. Any person who wields some form of authority over the FBI, and I include myself in this statement, has suffered from fade deployments.

Basically, the FBI has been unwilling to concede to any outer controls or limitations from American leadership.

10.  Now, will the agency be forced to withdraw its false accusations against you and your family members?

Answer:  I would like to see it happen immediately, yes.

11.  Will the agency be forced to withdraw all fade deployments from American leadership and the American people?

Answer:  This would be the best possible outcome of these revelations.  I hope our leaders insist on that withdrawal and I hope they won't relent until it is verifiably accomplished.

12.  Will you please keep us updated with regard to your family's wellbeing and your own?

Answer:  Certainly.  

13.  Will you please let us know whether you are being treated honorably and respectfully in your current residence in Aura Flagstaff, Arizona?

Answer:  Of course.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us tonight.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

FBI Threats of "Eviction" Without Cause

OIG Hotline, please be informed of my communication, below, with Kas of Aura Flagstaff for your reference.

Please note that this issue appears to accompany FBI threats of "eviction" without cause.

It may be that the FBI is attempting to change the terms of the lease to absolve Aura of any liability for harm that might occur to me while being an Aura resident.  The FBI often sets to work on revising legal agreements to release all liability for harm up to and including first degree murder.

Further, perhaps the FBI feels emboldened in knowing that the Arizona Attorney General's Office has elected not to protect me from housing discrimination and attendant harm.

I will provide your Office with all updates regarding this matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Email sent to Kas of Aura Flagstaff at 9:01 PM on April 29, 2026:

Kas, do you recall that, on April 24th, while we were working together on lease materials in your office, I asked you to correct the spelling of my last name from Macwilliams to MacWilliams, with a capital W?

I wanted to be certain that the lease was valid with the correct spelling of my name, so I did not complete the signing of the first version you emailed to me, but rather the second.

Is this your clear understanding?  It certainly is mine.  (Please be aware that because of my human rights advocacy, I need to record my interactions out and about in the wider world; so we do actually have objective documentation to reference should there be any confusion on this point whatsoever.)

I am concerned because now my account within Bilt is misspelled to Macwilliams, whereas it as correctly spelled as MacWilliams previously.

In addition, the second email you sent to me with the link to the lease marked with the correct spelling of my last name, MacWilliams, has apparently been deleted from my gmail account.

(Sometimes these things happen, but the fact that Krystal is now asking me spontaneously to re-sign the lease for Aura with a different spelling of my last name is deeply concerning.  I am not informed as to whether there have been any changes made to the lease documents I signed on the 24th.)

I think the best thing for us to do is to start with our shared recollection of events on the 24th.  Once we have established a mutual recollection of those facts, perhaps you would be so kind as to re-forward the second email you sent to me with the correct spelling of my last name.

From there, we can establish what exactly has gone missing with regard to my original documentation and attempt to locate it appropriately.

Thank you for your support with this matter.  I do realize you are away and that your response may be delayed due to travels.  I hope you're finding your conference productive and enjoyable!

Kind regards,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline,

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails to your Office.  Please note that this list will be updated.

April 29, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats, April 28, 2026, sent at 12:34 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Note to L, sent at 12:18 AM Pacific time.

April 28, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats, April 28, 2026, sent at 10:19 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Unexplained Email Content in Russian, sent at 9:49 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Jurisdiction of the Arizona Attorney General's Office, Civil Rights Division, sent at 4:17 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:58 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Looking Forward, sent at 11:53 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Suspicious Vehicle at Both SpringHill Suites and Aura, sent at 3:27 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Texts GTM, sent at 12:11 AM Pacific time.

Email to the Coconino County Director of Public Health Services, Michele Axlund

Public Health Advisory

Ms. Axlund, as Director of Public Health Services for Coconino County, please be informed that there is an allegation that the FBI directed the dissemination of a dangerous fungal infection, the spores of which were reportedly contained within a substance provided to the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital recently.

I visited the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital on April 21, 2026, when we were shown into a room with floors that were soaking wet.  When I commented on this, the administrative assistant, Norma, immediately took us into another room.

Following this visit, I received a threat that the floors had intentionally been contaminated with a fungal pathogen that is resistant to treatment and causes amputations and fatalities for many people and animals, both.

As a result, I followed up immediately with the veterinary office, though I received no reply.

When one of my dogs developed a white fungal infection on one of her paws, noticed yesterday, I emailed the veterinary office again, and have still received no reply.

Please see those communications, here attached.

Should this situation worsen for my dog, should the infection spread to my second dog or to me, I will reach out to you again.

In the meantime, the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital may have no idea what substance they were asked to disseminate.  If their staff is affected, or if Flagstaff residents and/or domestic pets begin to show resistant fungal infections which cause amputations and fatalities, please treat this communications as an important notification for the community as a whole.

For your information, the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital is alleged to have received directives pertaining to the dissemination of this pathogen from the FBI or FBI affiliates as part of its "infrastructure" programs.

Even so, I believe that Arizona state laws would prohibit knowing or intentional public harm through this type of active and willful dissemination of disease.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this concern to your Office.

Please reach out to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice with any questions or concerns regarding this matter.

Sincerely yours, 

Lane MacWilliams

I Am Not Patient Zero

 OIG Hotline, please be informed that I just recently took my dogs for a long walk to Ponderosa Pines Park and Ponderosa Trail.

They did walk on the grass and briefly roll on the grass, although they were wearing coats.  I had recently treated their paws with Lotrimin as a precaution.

At a distance, there were children playing with hula hoops on the lawn, but we had no interaction with them whatsoever.

The dogs rather exuberantly said hello to one older golden retriever, but they did not touch noses or paws.  I do not believe there was the possibility of any contagion of a fungal illness, though I have no idea of whether spores associated with the FBI's recent alleged dissemination of a dangerous fungal illness invade the lungs and airways.

I raise this subject because of the fact that the FBI has a history of conveying dangerous diseases to "targets of interest," only to go before a judge in a concealed proceeding and argue that she or he must be killed, or her or his pets must be killed, in order to prevent contagion.

I have been through this routine before regarding certain dangerous viral illnesses the FBI has conveyed to us, and I find this method of harm to be astoundingly manipulative and predatory.

The FBI now appears to allege that Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx has directed this approach today as a political "stratagem" intended to justify first degree murder and subsequent misappropriation of funds awarded over the course of this case.  (For the record, I don't know Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx and have no basis for judging the veracity of this allegation.)

What is the reality of this circumstance?

The FBI appears to be playing with numerous pathogens, intentionally disseminated to the American public, with the express purpose of causing mxxx fxxxxxxxxx.

The agency finds it convenient to silence its critics by alleging that they are "patient zero" in what later is to become an out-of-control pxxxxxxx.

With falsified evidence of "patient zero" status for a given "target of interest," the FBI goes before a judge to ask for the death penalty "in the interests of public safety."

Later, in what the FBI publicly characterizes as a "tragic" sequence of events, many people dxx.

And this is allegedly what the FBI has attempted to do today in indicting me for taking my dogs for a walk when the FBI allegedly caused them a deadly fungal infection.

Normally, I would not post this information on my blog, for confidentiality reasons.

But the FBI clearly has yet to learn its lesson here.

I will be contacting various authorities regarding the FBI's conduct in this instance, and I will be making them all public.

If President Trump chooses to withdraw this intentional harm from my dogs, from myself, from the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital, and from the community of Flagstaff, that would be highly appropriate.

If not, history will remember him as a President who violated all human rights with the apparent intention of personally profiteering from that process.

That's his call, certainly, and I'm sure he will consider it with care.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office today.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams