1. The FBI appears to have accused you of sending out anonymous letters to public officials, including threats and other content that would constitute felonious conduct. Have you engaged in any such activity?
Answer: Absolutely not. I am representing the long term human rights of hundreds of millions of Americans, and beyond our borders, all those we influence all over the world. I maintain that responsibility with the utmost honor and integrity in every setting and at all times.
Beyond this, I will simply say that I am a person who has received over one million death threats from the FBI and its affiliates, and I am keenly aware of how upsetting, disruptive, disrespectful and criminal this conduct actually is. I've been on the receiving end of this type of human rights violation, so I speak from experience when I say that threats are intended to diminish our potential, our reach, our fortitude, our resilience and our resolve.
And we need to reject them in every circumstance.
2. Yet threats that are a preview of actual tangible aggression have a profound impact on people's behavior. Can you speak to this at greater length, please?
Answer: Yes, this is a tragic reality. A man who is being threatened with forced job loss unless he signs false witness statements about his wife for example will likely stop communicating with her altogether.
3. Has that occurred to anyone you know?
Answer: Yes, it has. The FBI apparently directed my husband to attest that I had been disloyal at one or more points over the course of our thirty-five year marriage. Yet, I have had only one intimate partner over my lifetime, a fact which my husband knows quite well.
You know, many marriages experience infidelities, and I will be the first to say that I do not stand in judgment of others' private lives. That is the private territory of family life, not intended for public scrutiny in the context of responsible and accountable adults who must answer to their loved ones.
But that is simply not my history.
I have done the hard work of remaining loyal over thirty-five years of marriage, and I am claiming full credit for those choices.
4. Do you feel that you deserve praise for that accomplishment?
Answer: From my husband? One hundred percent. Yes. I don't expect the world to praise me for my private life, but I do expect my husband to recognize that -- okay, here is a woman who turned away from many circumstances that could have compromised her virtue and instead chose to be entirely loyal to the promises she made on our wedding day thirty-five years ago.
5. But what if the FBI is threatening your husband with job loss unless he impugns your virtue?
Answer: Indeed. That would be a harrowing situation that would render him almost entirely silent, despite our long years together in a trustful and loving relationship.
6. Is your husband now almost entirely silent regarding his communications with you?
Answer: He is.
7. And is there any other explanation for the sudden change in his communication to you?
Answer: None.
8. Are you able to seek his formal attestation regarding your honor and integrity over the course of your marriage?
Answer: Yes, and I will do so. But because I cannot now count on the timing of his reply, I am disclosing this problem publicly at this juncture.
9. To what extent is Tom Lyons controlling these events?
Answer: Centrally, I would expect.
10. Has Tom Lyons himself been in direct communication with your husband?
Answer: Either he or his colleague, Iggy, or other FBI agents. They would have selected someone who could convincingly convey all manner of threats.
11. What is the objective of this line of approach?
Answer: Primarily, the objectives are defamation, concealed criminal allegations, concealed criminal convictions, and a concealed judge's order allowing first-degree murder by the FBI, in that order.
12. Does this relate to Tom Lyons' crimes involving your family property on Cape Cod in any way?
Answer: Tom Lyons may feel trapped by the proofs of his criminal conduct involving my family home on Cape Cod, yes. So, his immediate strategem may be redoubled aggression and yet more extensive false accusations.
13. Can Tom Lyons win in this situation?
Answer: Not now. I have the freedom to publicly discuss his crimes, while he is required to maintain his corrupt conduct in a concealed manner within the agency. So, no, he can no longer win, per se.
That doesn't mean he isn't trying.
14. The FBI has recently alleged that Tom Lyons has authorized your abduction and/or detention in order to silence you regarding the crimes he has committed against your family.
Has that manifested in any real-world threats to your safety?
Answer: Many, I would say.
15. Are you able to specify?
Answer: Yesterday, I had an Uber ride from a highly dangerous individual, not residing in Flagstaff and not familiar with Flagstaff, who just happened to be one minute away from my apartment building at the time of my ride request.
16. How would you assess the Uber driver who appeared at your door?
Answer: I wish to make clear that I notified my husband of the ride details before getting into the vehicle. But I would assess the driver as a highly experienced contractor, working for the Pxxxxxx Program, someone with extensive training in physical combat, an immigrant with a heavy debt to immigration authorities within the United States, likely from Cuba or Venezuela, a profoundly dangerous individual.
17. How were you able to assess all of this over the course of a short Uber ride?
Answer: I have learned to sense when a person is seeking an opportunity to aggress. There's a certain stillness that is artificial, a certain preternatural focus of attention. After you've seen this a few times, you recognize it fairly rapidly. But the driver also talked about himself, and this always reveals volumes.
18. Why Cuba or Venezuela?
Answer: Because the FBI has stated an attempt to mischaracterize me as a Communist. So, the agency would endeavor to put me in a car with someone from a Communist or Socialist country, and then, almost certainly, to pair that event with AI-generated audio regarding the dialogue during the Uber ride.
19. Would the FBI be pressuring your husband and sons to defame you as a Communist at the same time?
Answer: This is highly likely, yes.
20. The FBI appears to have suggested that Tom Lyons is now not only engaged in the planning of your first-degree murder, but is also engaged in "succession planning" regarding your critical role in leading the long term defense of human rights within the United States. Is that correct?
Answer: My understanding is that Tom Lyons is involved in "succession planning" regarding my legal case, due to the fact that he and his colleagues want a puppet in this role, a pawn who can be easily controlled by the FBI, now and in the future.
21. What does that "succession planning" involve as you understand it, please?
Answer: Genetic impersonation, AI-generated communications and representations, including audio and video of my voice and likeness, a general plan of "replacement" in the public view to follow a kidnapping/torture/murder sequence by the FBI that is to be entirely concealed.
This has been tried before, as with the Chinese tennis player Peng Shuai after she disclosed sexual assault by a Chinese Vice Premier. The videos that have been released since her disappearance do not appear genuine, and many people believe she is no longer alive.
22. How does the public know that you yourself are participating in this interview, and not an AI-representation of you?
Answer: Because I'm still kicking ass.
An AI-representation of me is not going to be making the FBI uncomfortable.
And believe me, these disclosures are making the FBI uncomfortable.
23. Can the OIG Hotline hunt down the Uber driver to ascertain the details of his Pxxxxxx Program affiliation?
Answer: Easily.
But I think equally germane is the judicial process which would have allowed this aggression. We need to look at the manner in which the FBI is routinely taking false evidence to a judge and asking for a concealed judgment of capital punishment, with no opportunity for honorable Americans to defend themselves.
24. The FBI appears to state that the current President is fearful about his legacy should revelations about your case be made public.
Answer: If President Trump has in fact harmed honorable Americans for profit, then I would understand his concern regarding the public's view of that conduct.
First-degree murder of those already unjustly harmed, including an American human rights advocate, is not a viable stratagem to address those concerns, however.
25. The FBI recently appeared to tell you to vote in a certain way in the current election in order to ensure your safety. Is that the case?
Answer: I evaluate candidates from an independent perspective, and I will not be separated from that objectivity for any reason.
And to answer your question further, I will simply say that there is no safety to be found in compliance with the FBI. This is an agency that harms its own people routinely, because it simply views every person as eminently replaceable.
I disagree with that view in expressing my belief that each of us possesses unique and irreplaceable gifts.
So, no one is going to be telling me how to vote, and no one is going to be telling me to abandon my advocacy for the long term human rights of Americans and the independence on which our sovereignty relies.
Whether that advocacy is private or public is a different determination, and one that I will be making in the coming months.
26. Will you be setting priorities for the foundation you have recently discussed in this forum?
Answer: I would like to have confirmation of the foundation's assets, and I would like to have confirmation of assets that have been misappropriated. But yes, I will be setting those priorities as a critical matter.
27. Have you received any communication as of yet regarding your request for information from the state of Arizona?
Answer: Not as of this time.
28. Will you please keep us closely informed with regard to your safety and wellbeing under these extraordinary circumstances?
Answer: Yes, I will.
29. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
