"The Devil's Backbone": The Problem of Fade Deployment for U.S. Leaders

1.  Someone sent an email to your inbox saying "There will be a President after Donald Trump." What was your response, please?

Answer:  Regardless of one's political views, it doesn't really matter who is President after Donald Trump, because individuals like Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx will control him.  

Every President has sovereignty violations now, which is to say, every President suffers fade deployment, usually more than one.

In the truest sense, we are entering into a stage play of government, a performance of democracy, a parade of puppets.

The succession of leaders is not meaningful in this context.

2.  Did the same thing happen to President Biden?

Answer:  It did, yes.  There were about five minutes when he considered holding a press conference to discuss the problem of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, but Ron Clain allegedly told him it was too big a risk, and that was that.

Later in his Presidency, we saw dramatic erosion of President Biden's ethical conduct, which was less likely a reflection of incipient dementia and more likely the result of fade deployment, although the fade could have caused the dementia as well.

3.  To what extent are other leaders suffering from fade deployments?

Answer: Well, this is the critical question.  To what degree are members of Congress suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent is the Supreme Court suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent are DOJ personnel suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent are our military leaders suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent are FBI and CIA personnel themselves suffering from fade deployments?

The FBI alleges that millions of fades have been deployed within the United States.  Government officials are no doubt a priority for Russian organized crime and Russian oligarchs in this framework, though, alarmingly, fade deployment is occurring with the help of our own citizens.

4.  Is human sovereignty itself a thing of the past?

It will be if we don't find a way to address this parasitic invasion of our most fundamental access to self-determination and identity.

5.  Who knows the most about fades?

The DoD, because DoD personnel are facilitating fade deployment within the United States at this time.

The FBI knows a great deal about fades as well, but the agency will be highly unlikely to reveal to Congress what it knows.

6.  What is the best way to monitor for the effects of fades?

Answer:  It's important for our leaders to continuously ask themselves whether their decisions are consistent with the values they have developed over a lifetime, or whether they mark a departure from their former ethics.

If they are feeling as though their decisions are changing in their character, there is a problem.

And I need to point out that this can be exceptionally difficult to perceive in oneself, so it's valuable to ask others whether they notice significant changes about a given individual when compared to a lifetime of conduct.

7.  What are fades really designed to do?

Answer: They can be considered a brain parasite or brain amoeba.  Fades are designed to invade human consciousness to the point of gaining control over human identity and decision-making.  Once they have fully manifested, so the FBI alleges, the sovereignty of the individual is significantly compromised.

8.  What does it feel like to be the victim of a fade deployment from your own first-hand perspective?

Answer:  It's profoundly difficult, because it becomes necessary to re-evaluate decision-making with a much higher standard of rigor and thoroughness.  Instead of moving forward with daily decisions as normal, I scrutinize important decisions with extreme caution and analysis to make sure they reflect my character and identity in every way, including the highest level of ethics.  So, it slows everything down considerably.

9.  Bxxxxxx Pxxx has allegedly referred to fades as "the devil's backbone."  Do you have a response to this allegation?

Answer:  Fades allegedly have the potential to control certain aspects of human aggression and sexuality, and the risk is that their most fundamental purpose is to lead Americans to turn on one another at a given time.  I can say, having watched my family members suffer from fade deployments, that you don't know what to expect from them -- even after having known and loved these people for decades.  

10.  What about you yourself?  Do you feel that you can rely on yourself to uphold your own standards?

Answer:  I will die before I abandon my ethics and standards.  But I think I'm fairly unusual in this respect.  I have more awareness about the potential effects of fades and I am engaged in extensive monitoring of my decisions and my conduct.  I still have had only one intimate partner over my lifetime, that of my husband of nearly thirty-six years.  

But it is accurate to say that I am appalled by the decision to deploy fades against me as a supporter for the sovereignty of the United States.  This should never have happened, and the fades should be immediately withdrawn.

11.  Should Congress now delve into this matter with the DoD and the FBI?

Answer:  This is an urgent issue, in my opinion, and I believe it should be given pressing priority.  The Congress needs to understand everything they can about the functioning, deployment and effects of fades, while comprehending that their intent is fundamentally counter to human identity, sovereignty and self-determination.

And the Congress should be highly motivated, knowing that they themselves have almost certainly been affected by fade deployments.

12.  What is your view of the appropriate determinations that should be made regarding fade deployments?

Answer:  Withdraw them all, for the love of God.  If we want to have a future in which our freedoms are meaningful, our human development is open to us, our human potential can be fully realized, then fades have to go, never to return.

13.  What about the argument that fades are a viable life form?

Answer:  There are all kinds of deadly parasites that can be considered a viable life form, but they diminish humanity to irreparable degree.  Humanity does not need fades, and neither does the Earth as a whole.  They should be eradicated in their entirety as a matter of national sovereignty.

14.  Will you please continue to illuminate this concern, given that you are on the front lines of this struggle?

Answer:  I will, yes, because I believe this issue to be critical to our future.

15.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Authority: Ongoing Crimes By the FBI

 1,  The FBI has reportedly caused your impending divorce through a myriad of harms to your marriage and family, yet the agency is also depriving you of a lawyer, Linda Anderson, because it appears to be afraid that you might gain genuine legal advocacy regarding your case.  What are your thoughts on this circumstance, please?

Answer:  I find it to be an appalling violation of my human rights, and I refuse to accept it.

2.  What recourse do you have?

Answer:  I'm going on strike.  All my efforts on behalf of the nation as a whole have ended up strengthening the enemies of the United States and those staunchly opposed to long term human sovereignty.  So, this is deeply disappointing, and I simply won't tolerate ongoing violations of my standards.

3.  Is the United States a failed nation because of the way certain elected officials are handling this matter?

Answer:  You know, failed nations embrace knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, propaganda, defamation, human trafficking, drug trafficking, wrongful imprisonment, unjustified torture and first-degree murder against such regimes' detractors.  

So there are enormous warning signs when it comes to my case.

When I checked into a hotel in Sedona, Arizona yesterday afternoon, the FBI appeared to reference a nearby "black site" designed for the torture and killing of the agency's critics.  This is clearly designed to terrorize the agency's betters, and it has no place in our society.

4.  You were feeling extremely nauseous today because of an apparent fade deployment last night -- this, at the same time that you were requesting that all fades be withdrawn immediately.  Would you care to reflect on this situation?

Answer:  Competent leadership is not going to allow sovereignty violations against those advocating for the nation's long term human sovereignty, because the damaging effects on the country as a whole are greatly amplified.

I find the FBI's decision-making to be monstrous, and I reject it out of hand.

It's not just that these FBI personnel are betraying the nation; it's that they are betraying the human race.

5.  Meanwhile, you have had great difficulty obtaining safe food and water, including an incident at a take-out restaurant yesterday.  Can you express what happened?

Answer:  I ordered four chicken sandwiches at a McDonald's in Tucson, and I paid $26.00 for them, after which the restaurant refused to provide me with the food.  I was nearly fainting from hunger, and this restaurant willfully failed to extend the food I had paid for.  My order never appeared on the electronic board as being in progress.  And it seems the FBI thought this was an amusing denial of nourishment.  Ultimately, I needed to walk out, because it was clear I was never going to be served.

6.  What are your thoughts about this experience?

Answer:  Again, it's completely unacceptable to me.  Denying food to a famished person  is not a joke.  It's concentration camp territory, and I find it highly notable that the FBI thinks this is amusing conduct.  The malice of this agency is quite an indictment.

7.  When you stopped to charge your electric vehicle this afternoon, a woman appeared to stalk you and your dogs through the parking lot.  Is that the case?

Answer: Yes, she was mildly harassing us, following us with her car, calling out the window to ask about the dogs.  I face this kind of situation all the time.  Who knows what falsehoods accompanied the antics?  But, depending on the lies, this conduct can be highly endangering.

8.  Her conduct was so unusual that you later photographed her license plate.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  The Arizona plates showed 431 YRK. 

9.  How does it make you feel to be stalked in public in this manner?

Answer:  Deeply saddened for our country.  No worthy nation can be built on lies about the virtuous.

10.  What do you make of allegations that your case is being used as an inflation vector regarding intentional and concealed monetary policy?

Answer:  Again, I think this is cause for grief.  My case should never be used to cause harm to the American public.

11.  And no one has been willing to meet with you to discuss your case and its importance for the human rights of Americans as a whole?

Answer:  No, they have not.  Two senators and a governor asked to meet with me and then cancelled.  But I have spoken to no one about my case.

12.  So, how does it feel to have divorce attorney decline to represent you at the directive of the FBI, when the FBI, through myriad means, has dictated your divorce?

Answer:  Annihilating.  It feels like a prelude to a murder, in which the FBI is focusing on isolating the victim from all known supports.  Institutionally, it fits with the FBI's credo of "disrupt, discredit and divide."  But more than this, it just represents psychopathic predatory behavior, in which the victim is separated from all family and friends prior to first-degree murder.

13.  You don't have any faith in the goodwill of the FBI or its affiliates.

Answer:  Decidedly not.  This agency has deprived me of all of my human rights over a period of years, and the threats are now worse than they have ever been.

14.  Do you give credence to the FBI's threats of abduction and murder?

Answer:  The FBI's affiliates have perpetrated abductions all through Central and South America, so yes, it is reasonable to assume that the horror of abduction will be brought to the United States due to the predations of the FBI as well.

15.  What would happen to the awards extended to you if you suddenly disappeared, were imprisoned, or were murdered by the FBI?

Answer:  Those funds would be misappropriated within a short period of time, and the American public would likely never hear about them.

16.  So, you protest your treatment on every level.

Answer:  Yes, I do.  The fade deployments as fundamental sovereignty violations alone are extremely wrong.  The deprivation of legal counsel is appalling and unacceptable.  The intent to isolate, harm, and profiteer from my case is unconscionable.

All of it represents an astonishing betrayal of good faith, and the fact that my case has become this horrible distortion of justice is something of which the nation's leaders should be ashamed.

17.  Has the government failed to fulfill its most basic responsibilities to you and to the public of the United States?

Answer:  The treatment has been outside of all bounds of human decency, of the requirements of jurisprudence, and of representative government.

18.  The government is still ignoring the requirements of the Supreme Court to provide you with investigative reports concerning your case.

Answer:  Yes.

19.  What are your thoughts about a DOJ that ignores Supreme Court rulings?

Answer:  It's likely that Pam Bondi lost her job over this issue alone, because she likely expressed that, as Attorney General, she was responsible for upholding those rulings.

But when the Supreme Court is ignored, the results for the nation are devastating.  We cannot expect that the long term future of the nation can be protected on any level when the Supreme Court is disrespected and disregarded.

So, we're seeing an abandonment of Constitutional requirements.

20.  You are deeply disappointed.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  It is fair to say.  I need to re-evaluate all aspects of this matter and my participation in advocating for the American people, because my efforts appear to be serving the adversaries of the United States, and not advancing the long term human rights about which I care so deeply.

21.  Will you be writing further about the compromise of your safety through fade deployments?

Answer:  Stacked fade deployments are usually intended to result in heart attack, stroke or aneurysm, but yes, the loss of full sovereignty they result in is by far the worst consequence of the monstrosity that such deployments constitute.  Presuming I don't have a heart attack, stroke or aneurysm, I will be writing much more about this, yes.

22.  You have repeatedly asked for outreach regarding your case, and you have repeatedly been answered with silence, isolation, and violations of your most fundamental freedoms.

Answer:  I have.

23.  Your friends, including your minister, have suffered extreme targeting by the FBI in their own right.

Answer: Yes.

24.  And still, no one has been willing to speak with you regarding these most critical concerns.

Answer:  You know, money is profoundly corrupting, and when money, not people, is the most important priority of government, then we see horrible distortions developing in which the government is profiteering from the torture of the people.

25.  With regard to your properties, has the FBI apologized for its conduct?

Answer:  Not as of this moment, no.  Any forward progress with my properties seems designed to create knowingly false reports and planted evidence, with an apparent intent to lead to arrest and worse.

26.  And, remarkably, you know that names of the individuals most responsible for these schemes?

Answer:  I do know their names, yes.

27.  What is your opinion of these individuals?

Answer:  These people struggle with self-hatred, insecurity, and severe mental illness.  They should not be in charge of a goldfish bowl, much less critical aspects of governance of the United States.

28.  What does it say about the United States when serial killers are permitted to stalk, harass, terrorize and harm the honorable public over a period of long years, without anyone in the government halting the abuse?

Answer: What, indeed?

29.  Will you please continue writing about these issues, given their import for so many?

Answer:  You know, it's all I can now do.  All other recourse has been closed to me.  My only option is to write publicly about the FBI's predations in the hope that this information will be preserved and made accessible by historical examination of this period of time.

30.  Can history hold the worst of the FBI's perpetrators accountable?

Answer:  It can and it must.

31.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

We Need to Talk About Ben Sasse

 1.  Ben Sasse, a former Republican senator, was recently interviewed in the New York Times regarding his terminal cancer diagnosis.  But, on reading the interview, you found some concerning details that, in your view, require broader attention.  Could you expound on those specifics, please?

Answer:  First of all, I would like to express my concern for Ben Sasse and his family at this time.  This is a person who has dedicated his life to the service of others and someone who has engaged with public life with a rare compass of ethics and integrity.

2.  But you find some of the details of his illness to be unusual.

Answer:  I do, and I think Congress will find them unusual as well.

3.  What are those details, please?

Answer:  Ben Sasse was diagnosed simultaneously with pancreatic cancer, lymphoma, liver cancer, lung cancer, cancer of the blood vessels and more.  This is an unlikely presentation when it comes to terminal cancer diagnosis, and it generally represents a deadly exposure to radiation or a powerful chemical carcinogen.  We just don't normally see people being diagnosed with unrelated cancers simultaneously.  When we do see it, there is a reason.  This is not merely "the luck of the draw" or compromised genetics.  There is likely to have been significant harm to the environment of the patient, and an inquiry into this matter should be undertaken by the Congress as a whole, in a bipartisan way, because this particular instance is so grievous.

4.  What should Congress do as a start to assess what has happened in this situation?

Answer:  Congress should pull Ben Sasse's FBI file immediately.

5.  How do you know that former Senator Ben Sasse has an FBI file?

Answer:  Everyone has an FBI file.  All Americans.  Even minors.  This is what I have been trying to convey through my discussions on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates.  If you think you're the exception, you're wrong.  If you think your spouse is the exception, you're wrong again.  If you think your children are the exception, you're wrong three times over.

6.  Do you have any idea what former Senator Ben Sasse's FBI file might contain?

Answer:  The FBI labels every American of faith as a religious extremist, so I can guarantee that much is there.  So the honorable former Senator would certainly have been mischaracterized as a "dangerous person" on this basis alone.

Having said that, there is likely to be a great deal of unrelated falsified law enforcement reporting as well.

7.  Why do you say that?

Answer:  The FBI likes to throw the whole kitchen sink of false accusations into the files.  Espionage, Terrorism, Child abuse. Capital crimes.  On the chance that any single accusation is later disproved, the agency can still claim that the "target of interest" was engaged in criminal conduct.

8.  Why is former Senator Ben Sasse's case particularly important to the nation as a whole?

Answer:  Because we want our elected officials to be able to speak freely about their opinions, their beliefs, their advocacy for their constituents, and their concerns for our nation as a whole.  If we have reached the point at which honesty and integrity in the public sphere are answered with a concealed death sentence, extended through a hidden adjudication, then we have lost our Constitutional governance and all the critical guarantees that go along with it.

Public service cannot become the arena of personal grievance, political vengeance, and targeted harm.  We need to rely on the ability of Congress, in a bipartisan way, to ensure that our elected officials, our former elected officials, and others who are advocating for the nation, are not incapacitated in retaliation for a perceived slight or a killed out of a desire to profiteer.  This is unacceptable conduct for any civilized nation, and we need together to reject it outright.

Beyond this, I would point out that Americans of faith are not radicals, extremists, or terrorists, and the FBI needs to stop mischaracterizing them in these ways.  The separation of Church and State means that no government body or agency should be targeting Americans for the manifestation of their religious or spiritual beliefs.

And that includes the FBI.

9.  What should Congress do if indeed it is found that Ben Sasse's FBI file is filled with disinformation?

Answer:  After that, Congress should inquire about any and all concealed judgments against him on the basis of this knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  

Following this, members of the House and Senate should obtain all information about the means by which the FBI may have directed specific harms toward Ben Sasse and toward his family members.

10.  Is there a responsibility on the part of Congress to ensure that Ben Sasse receives the best possible care at this time?

Answer:  Congress needs to evaluate this matter behind closed doors.  I would certainly hope that Ben Sasse's care would be prioritized under these circumstances.

Republicans and Democrats alike need to know that they are empowered to speak their minds, to help their constituents, to uphold long term human rights for Americans, and to lead with honesty, integrity, courage, and fortitude.

That means we're going to need certain changes within the FBI, because no Congressperson or former Congressperson should be suffering due to their public service.  Our nation is immeasurably weakened whenever this happens.

11.  Do you think both Democrats and Republicans can join together to address this particular issue?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Everyone needs to express that, as our elected leaders, they are collectively insisting that their ability to exercise their Constitutional freedoms in defense of the national interest must be protected.

And the same holds true for our military leaders and retired military leaders.  We don't want to see those who demonstrate the power of extraordinary character and integrity being targeted in any manner whatsoever by the FBI or any of its affiliates.  We need our military to be able to hold the line in certain critical aspects of the nation's future.  That means our leaders within the Congress and the military both need to reject the targeting of those who are serving or have served Americans' sovereignty and security.

12.  When should this concern be taken up by a busy and overburdened Congress?

Answer:  How soon is now?  This is an urgent matter for all of our leaders, and it needs to be addressed immediately.  Any time we have a problem with the architecture of our government, the issue needs to rise to the top of our priorities.

13.  Will we be reading about this issue in the newspapers?

Answer:  No, I expect that Congress will address it confidentially.  But Congress, the Supreme Court and the DOJ have a critical role in ensuring that there are laws in place that protect civilian and military leaders who are advocating -- or, as in the case of former Senator Ben Sasse -- who have advocated in the past -- for the welfare of the American public and their long term human rights.

14.  You have documented recently that the FBI seems to be expressing profound antipathy to American churches and houses of worship.

Answer:  Yes, and that antipathy plays a role in this particular instance, I have no doubt.  But Americans of faith are not insane, dangerous, delusional, or radicalized.  And as Americans, we have the right to worship as we choose, with all the Constitutional freedoms that are afforded to us.  Now is not the time to be relinquishing that right.  Our nation is much weaker if we are disallowed from exercising religious freedom.  Spiritual inquiry should not translate to an indictment.  And this needs to be made much clearer to the FBI.

15.  Is there anything you would like to add?

Answer:  Totalitarianism can often arrive with technological advances that outpace our moral and spiritual development.  Knowledge without commensurate wisdom and benevolence represents a tremendous risk for human society, and, indeed, for the world as a whole.

Right now, the FBI is wielding highly advanced tools without the insight, wisdom, and restraint that we require.  And, in the realm of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, AI is increasingly being harnessed to the aggregation of disinformation about Americans and to the unseen consequences of that aggregation.

We don't currently have meaningful plans in place to deconstruct the architecture of that false reporting.  These files of disinformation represent Americans' permanent records.  And they may not be public, but they are determinative.

So, this represents a governmental crisis, and not only for the United States, but for other nations as well.

16.  Can we change our current course?

Answer:  We need to engage at every inflection point available to us.  But yes, if I didn't think we could rescue human sovereignty for Americans, and by extension all those we influence, I wouldn't be striving for our future in this manner.

17.  What do we need to be focusing on most?

Answer:  Right now, let's focus on the good Senator Ben Sasse, and, regardless of our political views, let's see what a Congressional investigation into this matter will illuminate.

18.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline, on April 10. 11,12, 13 and 14,, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to the attention of your Office on April 10, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Signing of Listing Agreement, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:38 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Code Red Allegation, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:39 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Best Western Dos Rios Management and Best Western Management, sent at 10:39 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Austin Airport Hilton Management, sent at 9:56 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Communication to Task Rabbit Support Team, sent at 9:42 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 8:51 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Stranded Due to Apparent EV Tampering, sent at 4:33 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 10, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:38 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 11:15 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: We Need to Talk About Ben Sasse, sent at 8:33 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Document shared with you..., sent at 1:03 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Strengthening Words for My Beloved Young Man, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:21 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 9, 2026, sent at 12:03 AM Central time.

April 11, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 9:00 AM Central time.
• The Need for Heightened Caution, sent at 8:56 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Code Red Allegation, sent at 5:18 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent Vehicle Charging Obstruction, sent at 4:27 AM Central time.

April 12, 2026:

• Notes to Myself, sent at 10:39 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signing of L...., sent at 5:16 PM Pacific time  (signature postponed while FedEx sent).
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 3:54 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Electrify America Management, sent at 10:39 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 12, 2026, sent at 8:41 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 7:15 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Please Do Not Commence Work Until I Hear from My Insurance... sent at 7:12 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Photos Fwd: ATTN: Atrium Inn's Management, sent at 7:00 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Atrium Inn's Management, sent at 3:08 AM Pacific time.

April 13, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: 2025 Chase Bank 2124 Records, sent at 1:16 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys,please respond as soon as you can, sent at 1:09 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: 2025 Accounting Information for 40 Gansett, sent at 1:03 PM Pacific time. (in addition to 12:05 AM Pacific time on April 14, 2026)
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Tucson Airport Hilton Front Desk, sent at 6:25 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Notes to Myself Re: A Few Words About ActBlue, sent at 5:39 AM Pacific time.

April 14, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Raising the Red Flag, sent at 6:55 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: I will call you tomorrow, sent at 12:09 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx, Confidential, sent at 12:15 AM Pacific time.
• List, Confidential, sent at 12:15 AM Pacific time.

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline on April 7, 8, and 9, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office today, April 7, 2026.

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Taskrabbit in Austin, TX, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:58 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 2:53 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: A Call for Clear, Consistent, and Sustained Change, sent at 2:42 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 2:26 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 7, 2026, sent at 5:53 AM Central time.

April 8:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, 7:32 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 5:07 PM Central time.

April 9:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 9:46 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information,  sent at 9:05 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Traveling Once More, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:53 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Engagement Letter; Draft Letter, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:44 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: FK Consultation Information, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:41 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Amazon Package Delivery, sent at 8:02 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Real Estate Attorney Referrals, Etc., Pertaining to... , sent at 8:00 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd:  Referral from Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx, sent at 7:58 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Policy #1509219 Coverage of Attorney Needed Due to Third Party Malfeasance,  sent at 7:56 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Additional Tax Documentation for 2025 and 2026, sent at 7:55 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Case Number 21030976 Pick Up of MB EQS 450,  sent at 7:54 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Document shared with you: "45 Vista Verde Marketing", sent at 7:49 AM Central time.

A Call for Clear, Consistent, and Sustained Change

 OIG Hotline, this is to document that current apparent threats I am receiving from the FBI include references to car bomb, hotel bomb, drone assault, staged car accident, acute illness caused by air and/or water compromise at the Airport Hilton in Austin, TX, food poisoning, heart attack, and other potentially fatal damage to underlying health.

The FBI appears to reference knowingly false allegations referencing mental illness, an irony given the documented mental illnesses of some of the personnel involved in this case among FBI personnel.

A substantive risk of false reporting appears to exist in the person of my TaskRabbit assistant, Audrey C., who is arriving shortly.  I will update your Office regarding the errands she runs on my behalf.

In general, I would like to see a complete turnaround in the current conduct of the FBI and its affiliates toward my family members and toward myself.

Until there is a clear, consistent and sustained change in directives toward this agency, I am going to assume that Txx Lxxxx and his affiliates remain murderous in their intent toward my family, my friends, my pets and myself.

I don't believe that conduct will serve the corrupt objectives of this cohort, and I hope that honorable members of our government will prove me right in this regard.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

The U.S. Postal Service in Support of American Sovereignty

An addendum has been inserted in bold-face type below.

*****************************************************************************

OIG Hotline, it appears that I continue to be deprived of legal assistance as of this writing, so I cannot rely on legal guidance in addressing the U.S. Postal Service.

A robust and reliable mail service is critical for the sustenance of our democratic norms, including the maintenance of mail-in voting in both Democratic and Republican states.  We cannot expect that mail-in voting will be preserved if the U.S. mail service is allowed to decline and fail as a public entity.

Therefore, I respectfully request that your Office allocate 109 billion dollars to clear the current debt of the USPS.  

In addition, I ask that the OIG Hotline allocate a 300 billion dollar endowment, of which not more than five percent of total value is to be drawn in any given year for the purpose of ensuring that the U.S. Post Office does not incur any further indebtedness.  The endowment should be invested in such a manner as to ensure retained underlying value over time, anticipating inflation, and should earn at least five percent interest income per year. The Post Office should have expert assistance in the management of this endowment.

The Post Office appears to have significant unfunded liabilities related to longstanding pension promises to its employees, and if those liabilities should exceed available funds on the basis of annual endowment interest (not to exceed five percent of total value of the endowment) and operating income, I would ask that the USPS receive assistance in addressing solvency concerns with its retirees.

The fiscal management of the U.S. Postal Service should be carefully guarded, as its failure to maintain reliable and honorable mail service, without interference or obstruction, is critical for our nation's sovereign future.  A trustworthy mail service is essentially a natural extension of free speech, the right to vote, freedom of assembly, and many other liberties our Constitution clearly delineates as protected activities within the United States.

I must state that the FBI and its affiliates should be expressly excluded from co-opting the U.S. Postal Service for the purpose of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  Fake communications, false donations, forged letters as "evidence" of supposed wrongdoing by the honorable American public must be halted quite decisively.  

The U.S. Postal Service should not constitute yet another way for the FBI to lie about the worthy American people.

Rather, we should ensure that the U.S. Postal Service separate itself from the FBI and its affiliates to the greatest extent possible.  Mail carriers and USPS personnel at all levels should be bound by promises to uphold the Constitution, and together with that vow, they should be expressly prohibited from lying about those members of the public they serve.

This endowment is contingent upon the discontinuation of any financial connection between the USPS on the one hand and the FBI and its affiliates on the other.  Individual postal workers should under no circumstances receive bribes or payoffs for false reporting for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency.

The U.S. Postal Service is intended to serve the American public, not participate in harmful conduct toward mail customers in any capacity whatsoever.

Further, it should be a federal crime for anyone to utilize the U.S. Postal Service in any capacity for the purpose of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  

The FBI and its affiliates should never be enabled to cause harm to the American public through co-opting U.S. mail service, and the agency's obstruction of the normal receipt and sending of honorable mail should never be permitted.

I hope the United States Congress and the Supreme Court will render this clear to all.

This allocation is predicated on these requirements, and I will appreciate their strict observance, as will the American people as a whole.

Thank you for allowing me to specify this allocation on behalf of the sovereignty of the American people, and on behalf of our national independence which derives from our individual freedoms.

I hope this gift will make a substantive difference to our shared future.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams