Facing a Recalcitrant FBI: Can Wisdom, Reason, Judgment and Goodwill Prevail?

 1.  What are your thoughts about the so-called "evidence" Txx Lxxxx and the FBI continue to throw before various courts regarding the harms they themselves perpetrated against your properties?

Answer:  It's exceptionally easy to malign people who are not present to defend themselves.  The FBI has been creating fake DNA evidence for years, apparently.  In general, judges do not know the extent of the FBI's capabilities in this realm.  So, the FBI just treats courtrooms as a playground in which they are making up the games, the rules, the players, the whole narrative.

And if I defend myself publicly, in this forum, I will be accused of disclosing confidential information -- confidential information used in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting to which I have been objecting as a human rights advocate for the last eight years.

It's not that the system is merely unfair.

It's designed to convict the wrong people.

And we have seen many examples of this within the Black community, when corrupt law enforcement officials submitted fake evidence to courts in order to guarantee rapid convictions, which ultimately were overturned.

So, the FBI has been working in this realm, with very clear objectives.

2.  What are those objectives?

Answer:  The FBI wants to be able to accuse any American of any crime at any given moment and have confidence that they can dictate the outcome.  That's totalitarianism, and it has been advancing within the American judicial system for years.

Michael German has written convincingly about the FBI's "criminalization of black identity."

And, of course, the FBI has criminalized all "targets of interest" through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

3.  How can the FBI be getting away with these crimes of false reporting?

Answer: I've discussed this before, but fundamentally, federal law enforcement officers are obligated to tell the truth, but national security officers are not.  The FBI is now defining itself primarily as a national security agency.

4.  Can our national sovereignty survive a lying FBI?

Answer:  No, it cannot.  We can have no illusions about this point.  It's not just that the FBI has lied to and about me.  It has also lied to Congress, to the DOJ, to the U.S. military, to the Executive Branch, to the Supreme Court, and to the American people in deploying fades against our leadership and a substantive part of the American public.

So, no.  We will have no sovereignty as long as the FBI is allowed to lie. The tools the agency is currently wielding are too powerful.  If allowed to persist, the FBI will prevail over all wisdom, reason, judgment and goodwill.

5.  Is there any determination on the part of our leadership to alter the FBI's current course?

Answer:  I cannot imagine that our leadership would not be furious over the FBI's conduct regarding the fade deployments.

How will that pushback weigh in the balance with the FBI's mission and objectives currently?

We will see.

Often throughout history we have seen that psychopathic institutions push their advantage when they have determined that they are needed and cannot be easily replaced.

6.  How will history remember the FBI?

Answer:  How, indeed?  A primary question on the minds of the FBI leadership is whether history can be suppressed through acts of first-degree murder.  Can history be killed, in other words?  The FBI believes it can, but I think their hubris on this point, as on many others, is misplaced.

7.  What about your documentation within the Smithsonian Institution?  Will it be preserved within Smithsonian auspices for Americans in perpetuity?

Answer:  I don't know.  As with so much about this case, I am acting on good faith in the hope that the Smithsonian has, at my directive, been granted an independent endowment, and further, that crucial information about this case will be preserved for the public to assess.

8.  What is the answer to resolving the FBI's crimes against your properties, and related crimes against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  The FBI has claimed secrecy surrounding its crimes against my properties, and I have explained that that means the agency doesn't have license to present false accusations in concealed court proceedings to wrongfully argue for my family members' deaths or my own.

The FBI cannot have it both ways.  It cannot ask me to protect information regarding its malfeasance while still falsely accusing us at every turn.

9.  Who is able to place those boundaries into effect for the FBI?  Who is in charge of the guardrails?

Answer:  Not many people, and I would venture to say they all have suffered sovereignty violations over time. Any person who wields some form of authority over the FBI, and I include myself in this statement, has suffered from fade deployments.

Basically, the FBI has been unwilling to concede to any outer controls or limitations from American leadership.

10.  Now, will the agency be forced to withdraw its false accusations against you and your family members?

Answer:  I would like to see it happen immediately, yes.

11.  Will the agency be forced to withdraw all fade deployments from American leadership and the American people?

Answer:  This would be the best possible outcome of these revelations.  I hope our leaders insist on that withdrawal and I hope they won't relent until it is verifiably accomplished.

12.  Will you please keep us updated with regard to your family's wellbeing and your own?

Answer:  Certainly.  

13.  Will you please let us know whether you are being treated honorably and respectfully in your current residence in Aura Flagstaff, Arizona?

Answer:  Of course.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us tonight.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

FBI Threats of "Eviction" Without Cause

OIG Hotline, please be informed of my communication, below, with Kas of Aura Flagstaff for your reference.

Please note that this issue appears to accompany FBI threats of "eviction" without cause.

It may be that the FBI is attempting to change the terms of the lease to absolve Aura of any liability for harm that might occur to me while being an Aura resident.  The FBI often sets to work on revising legal agreements to release all liability for harm up to and including first degree murder.

Further, perhaps the FBI feels emboldened in knowing that the Arizona Attorney General's Office has elected not to protect me from housing discrimination and attendant harm.

I will provide your Office with all updates regarding this matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Email sent to Kas of Aura Flagstaff at 9:01 PM on April 29, 2026:

Kas, do you recall that, on April 24th, while we were working together on lease materials in your office, I asked you to correct the spelling of my last name from Macwilliams to MacWilliams, with a capital W?

I wanted to be certain that the lease was valid with the correct spelling of my name, so I did not complete the signing of the first version you emailed to me, but rather the second.

Is this your clear understanding?  It certainly is mine.  (Please be aware that because of my human rights advocacy, I need to record my interactions out and about in the wider world; so we do actually have objective documentation to reference should there be any confusion on this point whatsoever.)

I am concerned because now my account within Bilt is misspelled to Macwilliams, whereas it as correctly spelled as MacWilliams previously.

In addition, the second email you sent to me with the link to the lease marked with the correct spelling of my last name, MacWilliams, has apparently been deleted from my gmail account.

(Sometimes these things happen, but the fact that Krystal is now asking me spontaneously to re-sign the lease for Aura with a different spelling of my last name is deeply concerning.  I am not informed as to whether there have been any changes made to the lease documents I signed on the 24th.)

I think the best thing for us to do is to start with our shared recollection of events on the 24th.  Once we have established a mutual recollection of those facts, perhaps you would be so kind as to re-forward the second email you sent to me with the correct spelling of my last name.

From there, we can establish what exactly has gone missing with regard to my original documentation and attempt to locate it appropriately.

Thank you for your support with this matter.  I do realize you are away and that your response may be delayed due to travels.  I hope you're finding your conference productive and enjoyable!

Kind regards,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline,

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails to your Office.  Please note that this list will be updated.

April 29, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats, April 28, 2026, sent at 12:34 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Note to L, sent at 12:18 AM Pacific time.

April 28, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats, April 28, 2026, sent at 10:19 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Unexplained Email Content in Russian, sent at 9:49 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Jurisdiction of the Arizona Attorney General's Office, Civil Rights Division, sent at 4:17 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:58 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Looking Forward, sent at 11:53 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Suspicious Vehicle at Both SpringHill Suites and Aura, sent at 3:27 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Texts GTM, sent at 12:11 AM Pacific time.

Email to the Coconino County Director of Public Health Services, Michele Axlund

Public Health Advisory

Ms. Axlund, as Director of Public Health Services for Coconino County, please be informed that there is an allegation that the FBI directed the dissemination of a dangerous fungal infection, the spores of which were reportedly contained within a substance provided to the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital recently.

I visited the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital on April 21, 2026, when we were shown into a room with floors that were soaking wet.  When I commented on this, the administrative assistant, Norma, immediately took us into another room.

Following this visit, I received a threat that the floors had intentionally been contaminated with a fungal pathogen that is resistant to treatment and causes amputations and fatalities for many people and animals, both.

As a result, I followed up immediately with the veterinary office, though I received no reply.

When one of my dogs developed a white fungal infection on one of her paws, noticed yesterday, I emailed the veterinary office again, and have still received no reply.

Please see those communications, here attached.

Should this situation worsen for my dog, should the infection spread to my second dog or to me, I will reach out to you again.

In the meantime, the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital may have no idea what substance they were asked to disseminate.  If their staff is affected, or if Flagstaff residents and/or domestic pets begin to show resistant fungal infections which cause amputations and fatalities, please treat this communications as an important notification for the community as a whole.

For your information, the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital is alleged to have received directives pertaining to the dissemination of this pathogen from the FBI or FBI affiliates as part of its "infrastructure" programs.

Even so, I believe that Arizona state laws would prohibit knowing or intentional public harm through this type of active and willful dissemination of disease.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this concern to your Office.

Please reach out to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice with any questions or concerns regarding this matter.

Sincerely yours, 

Lane MacWilliams

I Am Not Patient Zero

 OIG Hotline, please be informed that I just recently took my dogs for a long walk to Ponderosa Pines Park and Ponderosa Trail.

They did walk on the grass and briefly roll on the grass, although they were wearing coats.  I had recently treated their paws with Lotrimin as a precaution.

At a distance, there were children playing with hula hoops on the lawn, but we had no interaction with them whatsoever.

The dogs rather exuberantly said hello to one older golden retriever, but they did not touch noses or paws.  I do not believe there was the possibility of any contagion of a fungal illness, though I have no idea of whether spores associated with the FBI's recent alleged dissemination of a dangerous fungal illness invade the lungs and airways.

I raise this subject because of the fact that the FBI has a history of conveying dangerous diseases to "targets of interest," only to go before a judge in a concealed proceeding and argue that she or he must be killed, or her or his pets must be killed, in order to prevent contagion.

I have been through this routine before regarding certain dangerous viral illnesses the FBI has conveyed to us, and I find this method of harm to be astoundingly manipulative and predatory.

The FBI now appears to allege that Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx has directed this approach today as a political "stratagem" intended to justify first degree murder and subsequent misappropriation of funds awarded over the course of this case.  (For the record, I don't know Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx and have no basis for judging the veracity of this allegation.)

What is the reality of this circumstance?

The FBI appears to be playing with numerous pathogens, intentionally disseminated to the American public, with the express purpose of causing mxxx fxxxxxxxxx.

The agency finds it convenient to silence its critics by alleging that they are "patient zero" in what later is to become an out-of-control pxxxxxxx.

With falsified evidence of "patient zero" status for a given "target of interest," the FBI goes before a judge to ask for the death penalty "in the interests of public safety."

Later, in what the FBI publicly characterizes as a "tragic" sequence of events, many people dxx.

And this is allegedly what the FBI has attempted to do today in indicting me for taking my dogs for a walk when the FBI allegedly caused them a deadly fungal infection.

Normally, I would not post this information on my blog, for confidentiality reasons.

But the FBI clearly has yet to learn its lesson here.

I will be contacting various authorities regarding the FBI's conduct in this instance, and I will be making them all public.

If President Trump chooses to withdraw this intentional harm from my dogs, from myself, from the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital, and from the community of Flagstaff, that would be highly appropriate.

If not, history will remember him as a President who violated all human rights with the apparent intention of personally profiteering from that process.

That's his call, certainly, and I'm sure he will consider it with care.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office today.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Did President Trump Authorize the Dissemination of a Dangerous, Resistant Fungal Infection with an Intent to Profiteer?

 OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to allege that President Trump authorized the dissemination of a dangerous fungal infection through spores distributed by the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital last week, which allegedly mopped a room with a liquid contaminant at FBI directive immediately prior to my entry with my pets.

At this point, my dog Birdie appears to have contracted the infection on one paw.

The Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital is unresponsive to my email queries for more information regarding this incident.

For background, I signed no liability waiver during this medical visit, and the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital is fully responsible for this infection.  Because I received FBI threats of its conveyance immediately following my visit, I wrote to the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital right away about this matter, without waiting for a problem to develop.

Now, the FBI appears to state that this fungal infection is resistant to all treatment, that it leads to amputation and death for many, that it is an issue for my entire apartment complex and community, and that it will be a matter for the Department of Agriculture to investigate.

I have a better idea, which is that President Trump should authorize the reversal of this harm.

Further, he should withdraw the FBI's false accusations of criminal activity on my part or on the part of my family members.

Beyond this, he should withdraw any and all plans to steal funds awarded to me on behalf of the long term preservation of Americans' human rights.  All attempts to hack, freeze, and invade my accounts should be halted immediately.

OIG Hotline, contempt for the public on the part of a top elected official is a matter the American people will indeed view with seriousness and rigor.

The public trust is not won in a single election.  Rather it is earned and re-earned through worthy and honorable efforts on the part of those privileged with its vestiture.  

In the face of predatory, deceitful, or dishonorable leadership, it can be withdrawn entirely.

This may be an appropriate moment for the FBI and its close affiliates to reflect on that timeless truth.

I will be updating your Office and the public regularly regarding this matter.

For your information, I am now being prevented from uploading photographs to this blog.

In the public interest, I would respectfully request that that capacity be immediately restored.

Thank you for allowing me to document this serious concern.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Alacrity and Conscience

 1.  You do not support political violence in any form.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, you're correct.  I do not support violence in any circumstance.

2.  May I please know your response to the events at the White House Correspondents Dinner last night?

Answer:  You know, this entire incident is extremely worrisome for the United States as a whole.  We need to know that our elected officials are safe, and we need to know that our journalists are protected as well.  

I will also say that I thought that what was most revealing about the entire circumstance was disclosed afterwards, in the details the FBI chose to provide to the public today.

3.  Can you please elaborate on that observation?

Answer:  The FBI has characterized the individual responsible for this incident as a Democrat, someone who participated in a "No Kings" rally recently, someone who is characterized as a "radical," and someone who hid weapons on his parents property without their knowledge or consent.

4.  What is unusual about this set of facts?

Answer:  The FBI left out whether or not the individual involved has an FBI handler, and I think this is a critical omission.

And I only raise this possibility because my older son's handler has reportedly directed him to hide weapons on our property without our knowledge or consent as well.

And I must observe, what a gambit!  The FBI can take out a whole family that way with very little effort.  Everybody in the family is implicated of wrongdoing, radicalization, or terrorism, while the FBI directed every single wrong involved.

5.  When did your older son's handler most recently direct him to move or hide weapons, presumably with Executive authorization?

Answer:  Allegedly on Friday afternoon, April 24, 2026.

6.  Two days ago?

Answer:  Two days ago, yes.

7.  And what could happen as a direct result of that handler-directed conduct?

Answer:  My whole family could lose our lives.  Nothing less.  

But we're actually looking at circumstances controlled entirely by the FBI and its affiliate agencies.

8.  You have been urged recently to change political parties, ostensibly by certain members of the FBI itself.  Is there an explanation for that communication?

Answer:  Apparently, the FBI is preparing to engage in mass arrests at some point in time, and primarily of Democrats, who are being wrongfully characterized by the FBI as Communists and radicals across the board, at least according to those who have discussed these stratagems of false reporting.

9.  What do you think is the likelihood that President Trump knew about the planned disturbance ahead of time regarding the White House Correspondents Dinner?

Answer: My understanding is that the White House Correspondents Dinner is typically quite a roast of the sitting President.  

This involves a myriad of critical barbs at which the whole world appears to be laughing.

President Trump has previously commented that the event is "negative" and "boring," and he did not attend for multiple years of his last presidency.

His announced attendance this year was considered a surprise.

I think the odds that he knew about this in advance are stunningly high.

The incident garnered understandable sympathy for him while endangering everyone present; and it completely disrupted the evening, so the President did not have to sit through it.  In real terms, the message to journalists might be understood as "don't criticize the President or you will be placing your life at substantive risk."

10.  What era are we moving into in terms of press freedoms?

Answer:  They don't exist now, and the question is whether they will be reclaimed at some future time.  But the press is already being tightly controlled by the FBI and its affiliate agencies.

11.  You submitted a civil rights complaint to the Arizona Attorney General's Office recently regarding misconduct by the FBI and its affiliates.

Answer:  Yes, I did.

12.  Will the Arizona Attorney General be following up with an interview regarding that submission?

Answer:  By law, the Office is required to do so, yes.

13.  As part of that process, will the Arizona Attorney General, and to be specific, this is Kris Mayes -- be obtaining a full copy of investigative reports from the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ?

Answer:  I certainly hope so.

14.  Was the directive to your older son -- conveyed to him by his handler on Friday -- to move illicit weapons of some kind from one location to another intended to prevent the provision of investigative reports to you?

Answer:  I believe so.  

I have also been informed that recent false reporting concerning my husband, my younger son and my daughter-in-law has been intended to prevent that provision of information to me.

15.  Should the judicial denial of the provision of that material to you be immediately appealed?

Answer:  Urgently, yes.

16.  Why urgently?

Answer:  Because I am currently receiving apparent bomb threats and sniper threats from the FBI.  So action on behalf of my family members and myself needs to be immediate.

17.  Would you request that the Supreme Court rule on this matter?

Answer:  The Supreme Court has already ruled that the reports should be provided to me.  But yes, an appeal of wrongful convictions by a lower court could be extended to the Supreme Court, certainly.

18.  Presuming that the Supreme Court is presented with sufficient facts to exonerate you and your family members, what should the Arizona Attorney General's Office do to facilitate this documentation being provided to you?

Answer:  They should make haste.  And I hate to say this, because we all know the reasons for the well-known adage, "The wheels of justice grind slow, but exceedingly fine."

We're just not within that era of justice at this moment in American history.

Right now, the FBI cannot be allowed any slack time in which to create more false accusations against my family or myself.

We simply need immediate outreach and urgent provision of the reports, because the window of time in which this conveyance can be made may be quite narrow.

So, people need to move with alacrity and conscience, knowing that I will immediately respond.

19.  To be clear, you continue to serve as a human rights advocate by engaging in the highest character and integrity at all times and in all settings?  Is that correct?

Answer:  Emphatically so.  I am advocating for the sovereignty of the nation, and I possess that role as my highest priority.

20.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams