My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Tuesday, April 7, 2026

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline on April 7, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office today, April 7, 2026.

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Taskrabbit in Austin, TX, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:58 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 2:53 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: A Call for Clear, Consistent, and Sustained Change, sent at 2:42 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 2:26 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 7, 2026, sent at 5:53 AM Central time.

A Call for Clear, Consistent, and Sustained Change

 OIG Hotline, this is to document that current apparent threats I am receiving from the FBI include references to car bomb, hotel bomb, drone assault, staged car accident, acute illness caused by air and/or water compromise at the Airport Hilton in Austin, TX, food poisoning, heart attack, and other potentially fatal damage to underlying health.

The FBI appears to reference knowingly false allegations referencing mental illness, an irony given the documented mental illnesses of some of the personnel involved in this case among FBI personnel.

A substantive risk of false reporting appears to exist in the person of my TaskRabbit assistant, Audrey C., who is arriving shortly.  I will update your Office regarding the errands she runs on my behalf.

In general, I would like to see a complete turnaround in the current conduct of the FBI and its affiliates toward my family members and toward myself.

Until there is a clear, consistent and sustained change in directives toward this agency, I am going to assume that Txx Lxxxx and his affiliates remain murderous in their intent toward my family, my friends, my pets and myself.

I don't believe that conduct will serve the corrupt objectives of this cohort, and I hope that honorable members of our government will prove me right in this regard.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Monday, April 6, 2026

The U.S. Postal Service in Support of American Sovereignty

An addendum has been inserted in bold-face type below.

*****************************************************************************


OIG Hotline, it appears that I continue to be deprived of legal assistance as of this writing, so I cannot rely on legal guidance in addressing the U.S. Postal Service.

A robust and reliable mail service is critical for the sustenance of our democratic norms, including the maintenance of mail-in voting in both Democratic and Republican states.  We cannot expect that mail-in voting will be preserved if the U.S. mail service is allowed to decline and fail as a public entity.

Therefore, I respectfully request that your Office allocate 109 billion dollars to clear the current debt of the USPS.  

In addition, I ask that the OIG Hotline allocate a 300 billion dollar endowment, of which not more than five percent of total value is to be drawn in any given year for the purpose of ensuring that the U.S. Post Office does not incur any further indebtedness.  The endowment should be invested in such a manner as to ensure retained underlying value over time, anticipating inflation, and should earn at least five percent interest income per year. The Post Office should have expert assistance in the management of this endowment.

The Post Office appears to have significant unfunded liabilities related to longstanding pension promises to its employees, and if those liabilities should exceed available funds on the basis of annual endowment interest (not to exceed five percent of total value of the endowment) and operating income, I would ask that the USPS receive assistance in addressing solvency concerns with its retirees.

The fiscal management of the U.S. Postal Service should be carefully guarded, as its failure to maintain reliable and honorable mail service, without interference or obstruction, is critical for our nation's sovereign future.  A trustworthy mail service is essentially a natural extension of free speech, the right to vote, freedom of assembly, and many other liberties our Constitution clearly delineates as protected activities within the United States.

I must state that the FBI and its affiliates should be expressly excluded from co-opting the U.S. Postal Service for the purpose of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  Fake communications, false donations, forged letters as "evidence" of supposed wrongdoing by the honorable American public must be halted quite decisively.  

The U.S. Postal Service should not constitute yet another way for the FBI to lie about the worthy American people.

Rather, we should ensure that the U.S. Postal Service separate itself from the FBI and its affiliates to the greatest extent possible.  Mail carriers and USPS personnel at all levels should be bound by promises to uphold the Constitution, and together with that vow, they should be expressly prohibited from lying about those members of the public they serve.

This endowment is contingent upon the discontinuation of any financial connection between the USPS on the one hand and the FBI and its affiliates on the other.  Individual postal workers should under no circumstances receive bribes or payoffs for false reporting for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency.

The U.S. Postal Service is intended to serve the American public, not participate in harmful conduct toward mail customers in any capacity whatsoever.

Further, it should be a federal crime for anyone to utilize the U.S. Postal Service in any capacity for the purpose of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  

The FBI and its affiliates should never be enabled to cause harm to the American public through co-opting U.S. mail service, and the agency's obstruction of the normal receipt and sending of honorable mail should never be permitted.

I hope the United States Congress and the Supreme Court will render this clear to all.

This allocation is predicated on these requirements, and I will appreciate their strict observance, as will the American people as a whole.

Thank you for allowing me to specify this allocation on behalf of the sovereignty of the American people, and on behalf of our national independence which derives from our individual freedoms.

I hope this gift will make a substantive difference to our shared future.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams


General George's Testimony Before Congress

 1.  I would like to revisit the concerns pertaining to General George's recent departure as Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army.

Answer:  Please go ahead.

2.  Have you received any information that General George refused to deploy drones or explosive devices against you at others' directives?

Answer:  Multiple times, yes, although I must point out that I am not in a position to confirm the veracity of those claims.

3.  Have you received any allegations that General George declined to deploy various forms of violence against you, including kidnapping and sexual violence, at the directive of others?

Answer:  Yes, I have.

4.  And have those claims been substantiated?

Answer:  The only substantiation I have of those claims is the fact that I have been fairly aggressively stalked in hotel settings since General George's departure.

5.  Does this mark a change in your experience lately, given that you have been traveling since March 27th?

Answer:  It does mark a notable change in my safety, yes.

6.  And have you received any allegations that General George declined to deploy Pxxxxxx Program personnel against you in an assassination order when others favored that aggression?

Answer:  I have.

7.  Do you feel markedly more endangered since General George left his position as Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army last week?

Answer:  Without question, I do.  I have a strong suspicion that General George was not caving in to those who support the gratuitous harm of honorable Americans for profit and entertainment.  

8.  You believe he disagreed with unethical harm toward the American people -- harm that stands separate and apart from mission and objectives.

Answer:  I do.

9.  Is it your hope and expectation that Congress will investigate this matter thoroughly?

Answer:  Yes, I would like to see that thorough illumination in closed sessions, allowing General George and other military personnel to speak freely to members of Congress about their experiences.

10.  Is there further information you would like to add?

Answer:  I think there are other deployments affecting my family members and myself that General George also opposed, and I hope the whole truth will be disclosed for the United States Congress as soon as possible.

My sons have reportedly been subjected to repeated sovereignty violations, so this represents an extremely serious area of concern.

As a nation, we need our military leaders to insist that military standards be upheld and preserved, even under great pressure to abandon them.  So, we need to recognize that, when our military leaders are being forced to retire or resign their commissions due to ethical concerns regarding departure from mission and objectives, the circumstances for our nation are extremely serious.

We need to establish a means by which our military leaders can fully document their objections to directives that diverge from their mission and objectives in an effort to discourage civilian leaders from exercising wrongful authority.

11.  Is history insistent on justice?

Answer:  We always need to be careful about who is writing our history.  If the facts have been documented in meaningful ways, then history is remarkably insistent on the truth.

When our leaders feel that they will be accountable to the truth of their conduct over the long reach of history, then the American people will be experiencing a higher standard of governance.

We need to do everything possible to ensure that we are supporting our military leadership in facilitating that documentation.

12.  Is there critical documentation that needs to transpire with regard to the ethical stance of General George in insisting that gratuitous harm not be perpetrated in this case?

Answer:  There is, without question.

13.  Are you specifically requesting that Congress illuminate the ethical concerns involved in General George's departure?

Answer:  I am, yes.  I think his departure signals a profound challenge to the sovereignty of military leadership within the United States, and I think the American people need to come to a clearer understanding of what has occurred.

14.  Is that possible to do without divulging protected information?

Answer:  Congress should have access to all information about this matter, and with regard to the public, yes, a much clearer comprehension of the pressures on our top military leadership can be achieved.

15.  Is there an alternative to closed session hearings regarding this matter in the U.S. Congress?

Answer:  No, I don't think so.  This issue is too important for half-measures or lassitude.  We need Congress to take the reins here and to wield them well.

16.  Will you please keep in close communication with us, given ongoing threats to your safety?

Answer:  Of course.

17.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Sunday, April 5, 2026

Regarding General George

 1.  Quite a few military leaders have recently been forced to retire due to alleged conflicts with the Department of Defense, most recently Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, General Randy George, who, by all accounts, demonstrated great fealty to the President's directives.  What are your perspectives about the loss of these experienced leaders from among our military ranks?

Answer:  The allegation was that General George attempted to defend the planned promotion of four officers to the rank of one-star generals, although there was an alleged attempt to obstruct their advancement due to race and gender.

2.  In fact, that obstruction did take place, didn't it?

Answer:  I would assume so.

3.  What does it say to you that qualified military personnel are being held back on the basis of race and gender at this time?

Answer:  It says to me that the FBI and the CIA are pulling rank over our military leadership, frankly.  Military officers and enlisted service members who are women or people of color, or both, are being overtly marginalized at this time, a change we can ultimately expect to see reflected in American society as a whole.

Those who are students of history will recognize that victimization follows marginalization, so the Department of Defense is now signaling that military or law enforcement personnel who are women or people of color will not be protected in the future.

Military leaders who stand for their own provenance over their ranks are continuing to be forced out, leading me to conclude that rules of military engagement are likely to be summarily and consistently violated by the FBI and CIA.  In other words, there will be no further rules of war, consistent military chain of command, or military justice that will be recognized as valid by the intelligence agencies.

4.  Is this conflict over promotions reflective of the only disagreement between General George and the Department of Defense?

Answer:  Almost certainly not.

I remain deeply concerned by the architecture of totalitarianism that may not be able, through reasoned and thoughtful engagement, to be deconstructed at any time in the future.

Alongside damage to our internal military governance, civilian structures of governance will be yet further decimated, to be certain.

5.  What are the risks for us?

Answer:  The risks include the vast diminishment of the level of human civilization -- not merely in our numbers, but in our determination to stand separate from barbarism, and our ability to rise above barbarism once it fully manifests.

6.  Do you see other warning signs?

Answer:  It is notable that, whatever one may think of their performance, two high-level female staff members have recently been forced out of their positions:  Attorney General Pam Bondi and Secretary Kristi Noem.

There are five other women in the President's Cabinet, but as women's human rights become more endangered within the United States, the FBI may dictate their removal as well.

7.  Secretary Hegseth's minister reportedly disapproves of women's right to vote.

Answer:  Duly noted.

8.  Is this an insignificant detail pertaining to governance within the United States currently?

Answer:  No.  It represents radically regressive ideology that may well have dramatic effects on our nation as a whole.

9.  How would you characterize the FBI's misogyny?

Answer:  As murderous.  Fairly frequently, if my hair is not perfect or I haven't applied my makeup, the FBI will send a death threat to my phone:  "All dogs go to Heaven."  In other words, if you're a woman, any worth you might have from the FBI's perspective depends on your attractiveness on any given day.  Of course, if a woman is too attractive, she might be murdered on the basis of her appearance as well.  So, the FBI regularly signals a mindset that involves the stalking and killing of women for entertainment, at least in the context of threats sent to me.

10.  Do you think General George would have approved of that mindset?

Answer:  I do not.  I think General George likely demonstrated superior character and integrity throughout his long career, and I think he would have made that clear.  Beyond that, I think his expectations for the conduct of his troops manifested meaningful standards for ethical conduct in every way possible.  That personal and professional honor may have made the FBI uncomfortable.

11.  What would you do if you were a member of the United States Congress at this point?

Answer:  I would be interested in hearing from every high-level military leader who has been forced to retire or resign over the last year.  I would want Congress as a whole to be asking difficult questions in closed sessions with these individuals so that I could gain a clear picture of what has occurred here.

I think we need to understand that when our military leaders are holding the line in matters of ethics and integrity, we need to be supporting their ongoing service to the nation.

If the FBI is even partially involved in dictating the removal of certain military leaders -- and I do believe this is a concern, given alleged communications between military intelligence and the FBI -- then we need to halt that overreach.

12.  Should certain military leaders be reinstated?

Answer:  Congress has a critical role to play in insisting that our military leaders have the freedom and authority to uphold ethical standards and military codes of conduct without losing their commissions.  The Congress as a whole needs to determine how they will support the military leadership in this regard, but I do think they need to consider meaningful steps that will guarantee that our military leaders can safely raise objections to misconduct, overreach, or gratuitous harm.

We are depending on our military to exercise restraint when restraint is possible.  That means we need to give them the standing to do so.

Without this, our whole society will suffer declines from which our long term recovery is deeply imperiled.

13.  Your father served in the U.S. Army, did he not?

Answer:  Yes, he did.  And I think he felt that the military reinforced his sense of innate discipline and integrity throughout his illustrious scientific career.

14.  Does it surprise you that our military leaders may be holding the line when it comes to critical matters being discussed behind the scenes?

Answer:  Not at all.  But again, we need to ensure that our elected officials defend them in turn.

15.  Today is Easter Sunday.  Do you have any words for us on this occasion?

Answer:  Happy Easter for all those who are celebrating.  We draw hope from the knowledge that, despite great travails, we can find sustenance and renewal in benevolence, generosity, compassion and abundant good faith with one another.

16.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline on April 4, April 5, and April 6, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your attention on the following dates.  Please note that this list will be updated.

April 4, 2026:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 4, 2026, 9:48 PM Central time, sent at 9:50 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, sent at 4:36 PM and 7:08 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 1:36 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 1:32 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Regarding April 3 and April 4, 2026, sent at 12:15 PM Central time.
April 5, 2026:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: von Herzen/MacWilliams Cape Cod Property, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:56 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 8:36 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Regarding General George, sent at 8:13 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 6:39 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: EV Charging Stop, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:21 AM Central time.
April 6, 2026:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The U.S. Postal Service in Support of American Sovereignty, April 6, 2026, sent at 9:58 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Control Over Rental Inquiries, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:36 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The U.S. Postal Service in Support of American Sovereignty, sent at 8:52 PM and 9:05 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Mooring Payment Date Discrepancy, sent at 6:56 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Mooring Questions,  sent at 6:53 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Investigation; Fwd: Proposed Changes to Mooring Regulations, sent at 6:51 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats of Planned Account Invasion, sent at 3:59 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 1:42 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Preservation of Evidence Demand..., sent at 1:39 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 12:17 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: A Reflection on What Lasts, sent at 12:11 PM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: General George's Testimony Before Congress, sent at 7:57 AM Central time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Front Desk Assistance, sent at 12:08 AM Central time.

Friday, April 3, 2026

What the Constitution Left Out

Our Constitution represents a brilliant delineation of our civil liberties as Americans.  Regarded the world over as a model of a people's foundational rights, it is viewed by many as divinely inspired.  

Our rights to free speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom from unlawful search and seizure, freedom of religion, separation of Church and State, in addition to our rights to privacy, our rights to own private property, and, indeed, many other fundamental liberties we hold as necessary for the congress of our worthy nation, our close-knit communities, and our meaningful individual aspirations as proud citizens of the United States, are guaranteed within the Constitutional articles and amendments upon which we all rely.

The founders were balancing myriad concerns in 1787, when the Constitution was composed, including the balance between state and federal governance, the rights of slaves and the critical question of their future, the place of women in the workings of the nation, the methods by which the co-equal callings of the legislative, judicial and executive branches of government could check one another when necessary, and much more.

So, we can forgive them for what they left out.  The task of identifying what is missing from the Constitution now falls to us to determine, with wisdom, courage, and clarity of purpose.

And good people, it is this:

Our rights are of inestimable worth to the future of our people and the sovereignty of our nation.

But they will all go away if we do not formalize the responsibilities on which they rely.

In addition to upholding our human rights, we must fully comprehend the requirement that we stand as much better stewards of the environment of the Earth.

Without our understanding that our freedoms depend on our responsibilities to steward the environment, we will lose everything we set out to preserve.

Without breathable air, clean water, pristine land, and a thriving wilderness, we have no rights at all -- nothing to bequeath to our children and grandchildren, no legacy we would wish to claim.

And this is the unsayable thing.

We have overtaxed the environment to such astonishing degree that we are now risking the future of humanity, and all of our beloved freedoms alongside this future.

Because we have not yet understood the seriousness of the manner in which our rights and our responsibilities are inextricably bound to one another, we are seeing serious losses of environmental resources around the globe, alarming loss of diversity of wildlife, the extinction of whole species and ecosystems which developed over thousands of years.

Humanity is part of this narrative, not separate from it.

Human populations are so high at the current time that the global environment is facing stressors that are unsustainable.  And that climate crisis is happening now, not fifty years from now.

As a direct result, we are seeing broad movements toward totalitarianism worldwide.  With these changes, we will experience not only a broad decimation of our human rights.  Totalitarianism also brings other losses, more shocking, more historic, and more indelible.

Good people, as tragic as this territory is, it was foreseeable.  And, in fact, it was foreseen.

What messaging did we need that we didn't have?  We needed the military to be assigned a forward role in speaking to the American public, and indeed, to other nations, about goal-setting regarding climate markers, so that all of us could have engaged in assiduous efforts to change our way of life early and profoundly in defense of the environment as a whole.

Climate change will never be a politically easy topic for elected officials to address.  The oil companies are too powerful for meaningful transitions in energy consumption to be made without de-politicizing the issue through coordination with our military leaders.  Entrenched interests easily create enough uncertainty regarding climate science for the public to be distracted, polarized, and conflicted regarding critical requirements for change.

So, we needed our most respected Generals to stand before the public as early as possible in explaining that the Earth's environment doesn't care whether Americans are Democrats or Republicans.  It doesn't care about our race, our gender, our religion, or our personal orientation.  In making critical changes, it is our commitment to our families, our communities, our national security, and the world as a whole that matters, not the superficial differences that can serve to divide us.

Such a course of guidance from our military would not have represented an autocratic course, but rather one that assigned politically fraught but critical issues to those required to stand separate from the political sphere.

And this should have occurred beginning forty to fifty years ago.

In many ways, we required a companion document to the Constitution, one which formalized our responsibilities in reaching climate sustainability and in maintaining it indefinitely.

We still need this document to guide us in the future toward humanity's preservation, alongside the realization of our greatest potential.

Without it, we will not succeed.

At this moment, our task is to identify every possible inflection point regarding the environment's trajectory and to intervene in it with the highest quality of leadership, wisdom, commitment, courage, and integrity we can muster.

Part of that analysis involves identifying critical environmental inflection points that were missed over the past forty years.

Our current challenges are immense and immediate, but they are not insurmountable.

We need all of our talents, gifts, insights, knowledge, creativity, resourcefulness and acumen in establishing a better way forward that seeks to reclaim Americans' human rights in the long term, and that seeks to rescue our national sovereignty at the same time.

Those approaches will not be conventional, predictable or assured, just as any moonshot endeavor is not a humble or meager attempt to change the course of our reach into the future.

But they must now occupy our hearts and minds in forming our unified resolve to manifest them.

And we must ensure that we have all the resources necessary to bring them to fruition.

My case before the Supreme Court continues to gather those resources.  Let's ensure that they are preserved for this most urgent task.

Lane MacWilliams