Email to the Coconino County Director of Public Health Services, Michele Axlund

Public Health Advisory

Ms. Axlund, as Director of Public Health Services for Coconino County, please be informed that there is an allegation that the FBI directed the dissemination of a dangerous fungal infection, the spores of which were reportedly contained within a substance provided to the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital recently.

I visited the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital on April 21, 2026, when we were shown into a room with floors that were soaking wet.  When I commented on this, the administrative assistant, Norma, immediately took us into another room.

Following this visit, I received a threat that the floors had intentionally been contaminated with a fungal pathogen that is resistant to treatment and causes amputations and fatalities for many people and animals, both.

As a result, I followed up immediately with the veterinary office, though I received no reply.

When one of my dogs developed a white fungal infection on one of her paws, noticed yesterday, I emailed the veterinary office again, and have still received no reply.

Please see those communications, here attached.

Should this situation worsen for my dog, should the infection spread to my second dog or to me, I will reach out to you again.

In the meantime, the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital may have no idea what substance they were asked to disseminate.  If their staff is affected, or if Flagstaff residents and/or domestic pets begin to show resistant fungal infections which cause amputations and fatalities, please treat this communications as an important notification for the community as a whole.

For your information, the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital is alleged to have received directives pertaining to the dissemination of this pathogen from the FBI or FBI affiliates as part of its "infrastructure" programs.

Even so, I believe that Arizona state laws would prohibit knowing or intentional public harm through this type of active and willful dissemination of disease.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this concern to your Office.

Please reach out to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice with any questions or concerns regarding this matter.

Sincerely yours, 

Lane MacWilliams

I Am Not Patient Zero

 OIG Hotline, please be informed that I just recently took my dogs for a long walk to Ponderosa Pines Park and Ponderosa Trail.

They did walk on the grass and briefly roll on the grass, although they were wearing coats.  I had recently treated their paws with Lotrimin as a precaution.

At a distance, there were children playing with hula hoops on the lawn, but we had no interaction with them whatsoever.

The dogs rather exuberantly said hello to one older golden retriever, but they did not touch noses or paws.  I do not believe there was the possibility of any contagion of a fungal illness, though I have no idea of whether spores associated with the FBI's recent alleged dissemination of a dangerous fungal illness invade the lungs and airways.

I raise this subject because of the fact that the FBI has a history of conveying dangerous diseases to "targets of interest," only to go before a judge in a concealed proceeding and argue that she or he must be killed, or her or his pets must be killed, in order to prevent contagion.

I have been through this routine before regarding certain dangerous viral illnesses the FBI has conveyed to us, and I find this method of harm to be astoundingly manipulative and predatory.

The FBI now appears to allege that Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx has directed this approach today as a political "stratagem" intended to justify first degree murder and subsequent misappropriation of funds awarded over the course of this case.  (For the record, I don't know Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx and have no basis for judging the veracity of this allegation.)

What is the reality of this circumstance?

The FBI appears to be playing with numerous pathogens, intentionally disseminated to the American public, with the express purpose of causing mxxx fxxxxxxxxx.

The agency finds it convenient to silence its critics by alleging that they are "patient zero" in what later is to become an out-of-control pxxxxxxx.

With falsified evidence of "patient zero" status for a given "target of interest," the FBI goes before a judge to ask for the death penalty "in the interests of public safety."

Later, in what the FBI publicly characterizes as a "tragic" sequence of events, many people dxx.

And this is allegedly what the FBI has attempted to do today in indicting me for taking my dogs for a walk when the FBI allegedly caused them a deadly fungal infection.

Normally, I would not post this information on my blog, for confidentiality reasons.

But the FBI clearly has yet to learn its lesson here.

I will be contacting various authorities regarding the FBI's conduct in this instance, and I will be making them all public.

If President Trump chooses to withdraw this intentional harm from my dogs, from myself, from the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital, and from the community of Flagstaff, that would be highly appropriate.

If not, history will remember him as a President who violated all human rights with the apparent intention of personally profiteering from that process.

That's his call, certainly, and I'm sure he will consider it with care.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office today.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Did President Trump Authorize the Dissemination of a Dangerous, Resistant Fungal Infection with an Intent to Profiteer?

 OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to allege that President Trump authorized the dissemination of a dangerous fungal infection through spores distributed by the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital last week, which allegedly mopped a room with a liquid contaminant at FBI directive immediately prior to my entry with my pets.

At this point, my dog Birdie appears to have contracted the infection on one paw.

The Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital is unresponsive to my email queries for more information regarding this incident.

For background, I signed no liability waiver during this medical visit, and the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital is fully responsible for this infection.  Because I received FBI threats of its conveyance immediately following my visit, I wrote to the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital right away about this matter, without waiting for a problem to develop.

Now, the FBI appears to state that this fungal infection is resistant to all treatment, that it leads to amputation and death for many, that it is an issue for my entire apartment complex and community, and that it will be a matter for the Department of Agriculture to investigate.

I have a better idea, which is that President Trump should authorize the reversal of this harm.

Further, he should withdraw the FBI's false accusations of criminal activity on my part or on the part of my family members.

Beyond this, he should withdraw any and all plans to steal funds awarded to me on behalf of the long term preservation of Americans' human rights.  All attempts to hack, freeze, and invade my accounts should be halted immediately.

OIG Hotline, contempt for the public on the part of a top elected official is a matter the American people will indeed view with seriousness and rigor.

The public trust is not won in a single election.  Rather it is earned and re-earned through worthy and honorable efforts on the part of those privileged with its vestiture.  

In the face of predatory, deceitful, or dishonorable leadership, it can be withdrawn entirely.

This may be an appropriate moment for the FBI and its close affiliates to reflect on that timeless truth.

I will be updating your Office and the public regularly regarding this matter.

For your information, I am now being prevented from uploading photographs to this blog.

In the public interest, I would respectfully request that that capacity be immediately restored.

Thank you for allowing me to document this serious concern.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Alacrity and Conscience

 1.  You do not support political violence in any form.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, you're correct.  I do not support violence in any circumstance.

2.  May I please know your response to the events at the White House Correspondents Dinner last night?

Answer:  You know, this entire incident is extremely worrisome for the United States as a whole.  We need to know that our elected officials are safe, and we need to know that our journalists are protected as well.  

I will also say that I thought that what was most revealing about the entire circumstance was disclosed afterwards, in the details the FBI chose to provide to the public today.

3.  Can you please elaborate on that observation?

Answer:  The FBI has characterized the individual responsible for this incident as a Democrat, someone who participated in a "No Kings" rally recently, someone who is characterized as a "radical," and someone who hid weapons on his parents property without their knowledge or consent.

4.  What is unusual about this set of facts?

Answer:  The FBI left out whether or not the individual involved has an FBI handler, and I think this is a critical omission.

And I only raise this possibility because my older son's handler has reportedly directed him to hide weapons on our property without our knowledge or consent as well.

And I must observe, what a gambit!  The FBI can take out a whole family that way with very little effort.  Everybody in the family is implicated of wrongdoing, radicalization, or terrorism, while the FBI directed every single wrong involved.

5.  When did your older son's handler most recently direct him to move or hide weapons, presumably with Executive authorization?

Answer:  Allegedly on Friday afternoon, April 24, 2026.

6.  Two days ago?

Answer:  Two days ago, yes.

7.  And what could happen as a direct result of that handler-directed conduct?

Answer:  My whole family could lose our lives.  Nothing less.  

But we're actually looking at circumstances controlled entirely by the FBI and its affiliate agencies.

8.  You have been urged recently to change political parties, ostensibly by certain members of the FBI itself.  Is there an explanation for that communication?

Answer:  Apparently, the FBI is preparing to engage in mass arrests at some point in time, and primarily of Democrats, who are being wrongfully characterized by the FBI as Communists and radicals across the board, at least according to those who have discussed these stratagems of false reporting.

9.  What do you think is the likelihood that President Trump knew about the planned disturbance ahead of time regarding the White House Correspondents Dinner?

Answer: My understanding is that the White House Correspondents Dinner is typically quite a roast of the sitting President.  

This involves a myriad of critical barbs at which the whole world appears to be laughing.

President Trump has previously commented that the event is "negative" and "boring," and he did not attend for multiple years of his last presidency.

His announced attendance this year was considered a surprise.

I think the odds that he knew about this in advance are stunningly high.

The incident garnered understandable sympathy for him while endangering everyone present; and it completely disrupted the evening, so the President did not have to sit through it.  In real terms, the message to journalists might be understood as "don't criticize the President or you will be placing your life at substantive risk."

10.  What era are we moving into in terms of press freedoms?

Answer:  They don't exist now, and the question is whether they will be reclaimed at some future time.  But the press is already being tightly controlled by the FBI and its affiliate agencies.

11.  You submitted a civil rights complaint to the Arizona Attorney General's Office recently regarding misconduct by the FBI and its affiliates.

Answer:  Yes, I did.

12.  Will the Arizona Attorney General be following up with an interview regarding that submission?

Answer:  By law, the Office is required to do so, yes.

13.  As part of that process, will the Arizona Attorney General, and to be specific, this is Kris Mayes -- be obtaining a full copy of investigative reports from the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ?

Answer:  I certainly hope so.

14.  Was the directive to your older son -- conveyed to him by his handler on Friday -- to move illicit weapons of some kind from one location to another intended to prevent the provision of investigative reports to you?

Answer:  I believe so.  

I have also been informed that recent false reporting concerning my husband, my younger son and my daughter-in-law has been intended to prevent that provision of information to me.

15.  Should the judicial denial of the provision of that material to you be immediately appealed?

Answer:  Urgently, yes.

16.  Why urgently?

Answer:  Because I am currently receiving apparent bomb threats and sniper threats from the FBI.  So action on behalf of my family members and myself needs to be immediate.

17.  Would you request that the Supreme Court rule on this matter?

Answer:  The Supreme Court has already ruled that the reports should be provided to me.  But yes, an appeal of wrongful convictions by a lower court could be extended to the Supreme Court, certainly.

18.  Presuming that the Supreme Court is presented with sufficient facts to exonerate you and your family members, what should the Arizona Attorney General's Office do to facilitate this documentation being provided to you?

Answer:  They should make haste.  And I hate to say this, because we all know the reasons for the well-known adage, "The wheels of justice grind slow, but exceedingly fine."

We're just not within that era of justice at this moment in American history.

Right now, the FBI cannot be allowed any slack time in which to create more false accusations against my family or myself.

We simply need immediate outreach and urgent provision of the reports, because the window of time in which this conveyance can be made may be quite narrow.

So, people need to move with alacrity and conscience, knowing that I will immediately respond.

19.  To be clear, you continue to serve as a human rights advocate by engaging in the highest character and integrity at all times and in all settings?  Is that correct?

Answer:  Emphatically so.  I am advocating for the sovereignty of the nation, and I possess that role as my highest priority.

20.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see recent emails to your Office, listed below.  Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day today.

I would call your attention especially to April 25, 2026 communications to Kris Mayes, Attorney General of Arizona-- important documentation, here forwarded to your Office.  These communications should be documented publicly in order to ensure that appropriate follow up from the AG's Office is facilitated.

April 26, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Massachusetts Real Estate..., sent at 4:13 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: California Real Estate ..., sent at 4:12 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 2:20 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: D, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 2:10 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 2:06 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Possible FBI Projection, sent at 3:04 AM Pacific time.

April 25, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: April 25, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, 7:21 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Receipts, April 24, 2026, sent at 5:02 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: SpringHill Suites Photos, sent at 4:14 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Concerning Properties, sent at 3:46 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Properties, sent at 12:11 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Requests from Lane MacWilliams, Marriott Bonvoy Ambassador #7xxxxxxxx,  sent at 12:09 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Submission: Civil Rights Intake Questionnaire, sent at 10:42 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Communication to Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, sent at 10:39 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: More About My Human Rights Advocacy, Conditionally Confidential, 9:34 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 12:03 AM Pacific time.
• 
  

April 24, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Move on April 24, 2026, sent at 11:49 PM Pacific time.

April 23, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Vista Verde Listing, sent at 8:32 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Non-profit Board Position, sent at 2:57 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 23, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:32 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: The Eleventh Hour: The Global Climate Crisis Meets an Unprepared American Public, sent at 11:57 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 10:07 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: An invitation to re-align with truthful communication, sent at 10:07 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 23, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:32 AM Pacific time.

A Territorial Challenge for the United States: The Race Toward Coastal Mining

 1.  Can you weigh in on the problems the United States is experiencing with regard to offshore mining?

Answer:  There is a push to aggregate rare earths at the current time, and there is a feeling that, if they are not mined aggressively, they may fall into the wrong hands.

2.  Can you be more specific with regard to the threats we are facing?

Answer:  There has already been a fair degree of deep-sea mining of which the United States is aware.

There is a feeling that, if our coasts are not adequately defended in the future, other interests could aggregate our rare earth metals, rendering them unavailable for our own use.

3.  So, either way, you are saying that the coasts will likely suffer extensive environmental damage.

Answer:  This is the greatest likelihood with our current approach, unfortunately.  

The best alternative would involve preserving our oceans as national parks or, in deeper waters, international parks.  Environmentally, this would serve as a safeguard against destructive mining operations and allow us to place certain protections of the ocean within the ocean landscape.

4.  What could those protections consist of?

Answer:  Sonic safeguarding would represent an effective approach, but this would need to be implemented early, and with cooperative planning.

If we get into a contest to see who can despoil the earth of its resources the fastest, then we've entered into a losing paradigm.  No one wins when the environment is ruined through rapacious mining.

5.  You sound as if you feel the United States may suffer significant territorial losses at the coasts.

Answer:  I think that's accurate, yes.  There are those who believe that we may experience various environmental crises that would force evacuation of coastal areas, and, following that, that we may not be free to re-occupy those regions.

6.  So, these areas may be viewed as uninhabitable?

Answer:  Yes.  

7.  But in truth, there would be coastal mining and other fairly radical environmental changes to the landscape?

Answer:  Yes, that's correct.  And coastal mining that was not being conducted by the United States.

8.  What are the ramifications for the health of the oceans?

Answer:  I think they're highly significant. I think we could expect to see a substantive decline in coastal marine habitat, perhaps to irreversible degree.

9.  You have said previously that there is an FBI allegation of evacuating Northern California on the basis of some manmade or "natural" disaster.

Answer: Yes, the agency appears to have extended repeated threats about this issue.

10.  Is the FBI planning to claim a terrorist event connected to the war in Iran?

Answer:  Apparently, this is front and center for the FBI, yes.

11.  Is the Trump administration actively involved in this potential scenario?

Answer:  You are asking an important question, and I hope that history asks it rigorously as well.

12.  What is the responsibility of this administration to address the climate crisis with the public honestly?

Answer:  There has been no indication that the severity of our climate crisis is going to be openly addressed at this time.  What is the responsibility to do so?  Well, I think it's a moral imperative.  

It's extremely difficult for societies to re-align with the truth once the government starts to lie about the most major factors driving certain decision-making.  It's not impossible, but there are many entrenched interests that support ongoing disinformation.

The public is not seen as capable of comprehending the truth, and the government ceases trying to extend it.

13.  Will there come a time when the truth can be spoken about the most critical pressures we currently face?

Answer:  That depends entirely on the character of our leaders, frankly.

Real leadership is not about hosting a cocktail party on the deck of the Titanic.

It's about preventing the disaster by captaining that ship with competence, foresight, communication, integrity, strategic capacity, preparation and adaptability.

14.  What is happening to those who are trying to point out our greatest challenges?

Answer:  They're certainly being identified by the FBI as "radicals" and "journalists."  Behind the scenes, the FBI considers them "glitches in the matrix."  In other words, the FBI is trying to silence these people, and as rapidly as possible.

15.  What is the FBI's current position, given that it has been found to have committed high treason by deploying fades against the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, the Executive Branch, and others?

Answer:  Significantly diminished.  I don't know that anyone in our government will ever really extend trust to the FBI and its affiliates again.  The breaches of United States sovereignty are too comprehensive and profound.

16.  The FBI appears to allege that the agency has returned to its former narrative of trying to discredit you with false accusations of mental illness.  Do you have any comment?

Answer:  The FBI is becoming much more rapid in the agency's utilization of AI-generated audio and video to falsely depict honorable American citizens.  So, the agency can create any dialogue it wants, any video it can imagine, in an effort to thoroughly discredit an agency critic.

I happen to be remarkably resilient and stable psychologically. much to the FBI's obvious consternation.

But lies and defamation are dangerous activities by the FBI, and make no mistake, they are intended to be.

17.  Do you have any history of mental illness?

Answer:  Never.

18.  Do you suffer from delusions or auditory hallucinations?

Answer:  Decidedly not.

19.  Are you depressed or anxious?

Answer:  Not at all.

20.  How do you manage your equanimity in the face of ongoing crimes by the FBI?

Answer:  I try to keep my focus on what I can do for others.  This is a great anodyne to the FBI's selfishness and narcissistic deceit.  In fact, on the basis of this conversation, I would like to think more about whether extending our national parks to include our coastal waters would be possible.

21.  Will you please keep in close contact with us, given the FBI's apparent ongoing predation toward your family members and yourself?

Answer:  I'm happy to do so.

22.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

An Open Letter to Tom Lyons

Dear Mr. Lyons:

Because you openly provided me with your business card (a card I still possess) at a meeting in Hillsborough several years ago, and because you actively invited my communications at that time, I feel that I am well within my rights to write an open letter to you regarding your misconduct against my family.

My understanding is that you are still employed by the FBI as of this writing.

Mr. Lyons, allegedly, the FBI routinely skims several percentage points off real estate transactions they prompt among their "targets of interest," whom the agency attempts, in all regards, to impoverish and dispossess of their property.

If the FBI cannot force a property sale, the agency apparently threatens, as it threatened to me, to drive the value of the property to zero through punitive crimes committed by the FBI itself.

This brings me to the astonishing allegation on the part of your own agency that you committed or directed a series of capital crimes with the intent of placing related "evidence" on one or more of my properties.

Mr. Lyons, I am certain the revelations of your purported misconduct in this matter are embarrassing to you and to the FBI, both.

But it is time for you to face the truth of any and all criminal acts you perpetrated or directed with an intent to wrongfully blame my family members or myself.

Actions have consequences, Mr. Lyons, and, as much as your immunity from prosecution has granted you license to perpetrate astonishing and gratuitous harm against my family, the truth has a way of emerging when honorable people insist.

And, Mr. Lyons, I insist.

Your forced recruitment of both of my sons and daughter-in-law into concealed government programs with which they wanted no involvement, for the express purpose of coercion of their conduct at your directive, including the provision of knowingly false witness statements, stands as a profoundly corrupt act, and one that should never have transpired.

Now, your treatment of them as virtual hostages to your whim represents unconscionable misconduct on your part and on the part of the FBI as a whole.

Are you aware that I regularly receive threats that my sons will be forced by their handlers to wield a weapon in public at your directive?  That they will be indicted on charges relating to drug crimes you directed?  That they will be arrested for assault or capital crimes you directed after violating their sovereignty in repeated and reportedly appalling abrogations of their human rights?  That you will further damage their cognitive health or their physical wellbeing?

Mr. Lyons, enough.

You will not escape accountability by further harming my children, just as you will not escape accountability by further harming America's children.

The sovereignty violations you have perpetrated against my family parallel the sovereignty violations you appear to have perpetrated against the nation as a whole in extending fade deployments against our most important elected and appointed leaders.

What has constituted your apparently irrational and obsessive harm of my loved ones has translated to your alleged treason against the nation.

I object, and I daresay the American people object alongside me.

Mr. Lyons, your apologies need now to commence, and they need to be accompanied by your consistent and ongoing demonstrations of genuine humility, sorrow, and remorse.

The funds you have misappropriated from awards extended to me must be returned in full, and you must begin a long and thorough process of atoning for your gratuitous harm against my family and the United States, to which we are loyal.

Your false accusations against me, and against every single one of my immediate family members, must be withdrawn in their entirety without delay, along with the corresponding harm they have justified.

The health harms you have directed against my loved ones and myself must all be withdrawn on a prioritized basis.

Mr. Lyons, the truth usually emerges in situations like this one, when a federal employee has caused harm to the nation with impunity, avarice, unconscionable aggression, and a complete lack of ethics or any perceptible moral boundaries.

Those who wrongfully seek to control and manipulate public officials through wielding disinformation and deceit may ultimately be caught, as you yourself have been caught.

And I hope this will serve as a lesson to your colleagues within the FBI each and every time they consider diverging from their mission and objectives to cause needless suffering toward the nation, to profiteer from their misconduct under color of authority, to defame and prey upon vulnerable Americans without justification, to exploit the young in a manner that brings lasting shame to your agency, to falsify records and evidence for the purpose of knowingly wrongful prosecutions, and to mete out spurious sentences toward the innocent.

History will not view these acts with forgiveness when the full extent of their cruelty and avarice is brought to light.

Mr. Lyons, I look forward to your lawful expressions of atonement, following the immediate cessation of your predation against my loved ones and myself.

These are vastly overdue, it must be said, as is genuine reformation of the FBI's widespread programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, unwanted by our nation, and unnecessary for any of your agency's legitimate goals.

Lane MacWilliams