1. The Springfield Police Department appeared to engage in an incident of corruption yesterday evening. Are you able to tell us about it?
Answer: There appeared to be an FBI set-up involving one or more false witness statements while I was washing my clothes at a laundry. I had not been able to launder my clothes in hotels due to what appeared to be threats of assault. So, this was my first chance to take care of that task.
2. What happened at the laundry?
Answer: A young woman entered the facility and started behaving strangely. She brought a duffle bag with her, but did not begin to wash any clothes. She appeared to be having a phone conversation, but it seemed she was the only one on the line. She crowded my access to my washing machine, so that I could not reach my clothes.
I thought her behavior was sufficiently odd that I later photographed the license plate of her car in the parking lot, which was Texas VLJ9900.
3. What happened next?
Answer: She ran out of the laundry in a state of hysteria, swearing, insulting, and moving toward me rapidly.
4. What did you do?
Answer: I entered my vehicle and locked the doors, while she proceeded to attempt to film and photograph me through the windows, all the while she continued her outburst. After about five or ten minutes, she shouted loudly that she could not even wash her clothes at this location, and she left.
5. What were your thoughts about her conduct?
Answer: She could have been mentally ill, except for the fact that right before she arrived, the FBI appeared to send a message to my phone that stated "This is about to get bad."
After the woman left in a state of self-created apoplexy, she filed a false complaint with the local police, who came to the laundry within a few minutes.
6. Did anything strike you as odd about their arrival?
Answer: They were smiling sheepishly when they entered the shop, as if they were stepping on stage and hoped they remembered their lines. Like children. So, I thought that was an odd approach.
But secondly, they didn't look around the laundry and ask questions about whether there had been a disturbance, which would have been the natural thing to do. They walked to me directly from the door and asked to have a conversation.
7. Did they ask odd questions?
Answer: They disclosed that the young woman involved had falsely claimed that she had had a racist encounter in which she had been prevented from washing her clothes, and that afterwards, someone was "being mean" to her in the parking lot.
8. What was your response to these allegations?
Answer: It was all apparently staged, based on what the officers disclosed. Because none of those things happened. One of the officers asked me to describe the individual, and I did mention that she appeared to be behaving erratically, as if she were mentally ill. Beyond that, I asked the woman next to me to assist me with a physical description, and she offered one that was accurate.
9. Were there any other clues to the false narrative?
Answer: Yes, the officer mentioned that the woman stated that I had been recording her. I have an audio recorder buried deep in my bag, completely out of sight, and it is only sensitive enough to pick up my own voice, not the dialogue of others, due to proximity. But only the FBI knew that information. The young woman had no way of knowing it. And the officers had no way of knowing it either.
So that was an immediate clue that the FBI was behind the entire incident.
10. Why did the FBI want you to acknowledge that you were recording your own voice?
Answer: I suspect that they wanted me to state that I was recording others, which is illegal in Illinois. So, they wanted to charge me with a crime for being harassed by their affiliates.
But, as I said, my recorder is kept in the bottom of my bag, and it can only capture my own voice because I am the only one near enough to the device.
11. What is the greatest risk in a circumstance such as this one?
Answer: The greatest risk is that police officers appear on the scene due to an entirely false report and then perpetrate a shooting without cause.
The next greatest risk is that the FBI creates an AI-generated video and/or audio of a confrontation that did not transpire in its particulars, that places blame on the victim, and that is offered into evidence in a hearing to which the genuine victim is not invited and has no opportunity to defend herself with the truth.
12. What are the odds that this gambit will serve the FBI in this regard?
Answer: Hopefully, these details will illuminate the truth of the set-up and allow a court to see the facts of an FBI which is frightened of exposure to one of its "targets of interest" through a pending FOIA fulfillment.
But the FBI will endeavor to coerce false witness statements from others who were present, and the agency will attempt to pair those false statements with AI-generated material, I have no doubt.
13. Was your conduct lawful and honorable in every regard?
Answer: One hundred percent.
14.. Was there anything else that was odd about the evening?
Answer: Yes, later in the evening, when I was checking into my hotel, loading the luggage cart from my vehicle, two young women appeared in the parking lot separated by five minutes, wandering rather aimlessly out to their cars.
15, How did you handle the circumstance?
Answer: I immediately began video recording my own activities at my own vehicle so that there would be documentation with a time stamp regarding my engagement at that hour.
16. In the absence of your having the presence of mind to begin video recording, what could have happened.?
Answer: Any kind of false witness statement could have occasioned another wrongful encounter with police, together with all of the attendant risks.
17. What changed yesterday such that the FBI became substantially more predatory?
Answer: I requested a review of the improper denial of my FOIA request from the Illinois Secretary of State Police by the Illinois Attorney General's Public Access Counselor.
18. Will the State of Illinois actually provide you with the information pursuant to your FOIA request?
Answer: If I live long enough, it's possible.
19. How are you going to adapt to the FBI's predatory aggression, as evidenced yesterday?
Answer: I will need to videotape myself whenever I'm in public. And I will continue to audio record myself, and only myself, as supplemental documentation.
20. How can the FBI be appropriately penalized for yesterday evening's events?
Answer: Well, I think they can be sued, and I hope they will be. It is alleged that the Chicago Police Department was extending directives from the FBI as an intermediary in communication with the Springfield Police Department. So, all that communication should be aggregated and assessed. Again, we need to remember that people die due to knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. It's not a joke. It's not a pantomime. It's not a stage play. It's a crime, and it's one in which the innocent can be shot.
21. What are your views toward the young woman who caused this problem this evening?
Answer: Honestly, it's saddening to see the public behaving this appallingly. Usually, these people are told that they will be helping to put a predator behind bars. But the truth is that they are unwitting dupes to the schemes of the FBI.
22. What is their ability to see through the FBI's defamation?
Answer: Oh, extremely low.
23. Is the young woman herself guilty of defaming you to others in the laundry and to the Springfield Police Department?
Answer: I believe she is, yes.
24. Is the crime actionable?
Answer: You know, I think it is necessary to understand that false reporting endangers innocent people. Do I think that the young woman involved loves this country more than she loves her payoff? No. That's not possible, and no worthy person would engage in the wrongful acts that she did, in my opinion. Under those circumstances, legal redress is appropriate, and I hope that means that she is held both criminally and civilly liable.
25. Do you feel that the conduct of the Springfield Police Department placed your life at risk?
Answer: We need to understand the conduct of the Springfield Police Department as part of an intended sequence. The FBI has been endeavoring to falsely implicate me as someone who is dangerous, predatory, and mentally ill, all the while the FBI is behaving in a manner that is dangerous, predatory and mentally ill.
Calling in a false report to any law enforcement authority is a crime that serves to place the life of the innocent victim at wrongful and reckless risk.
Police officers carry weapons, they carry badges, and they carry a responsibility to the public.
Their critical vows should never be violated as a stunt, a prank, a joke, a lie, a dare, a stage play, or an opportunity to profiteer.
26. When is the last time you spoke to a Sheriff's Deputy?
Answer: When my husband and I filed a stalking report against Brandan Pesa to corrupt San Mateo County Sheriff's Deputy Rick Chaput and his partner in 2020, only to have Mr. Pesa direct Mr. Chaput to, without notifying me or my family members or requesting permission from any of us, refer me to Adult Protective Services because, according to the withheld report, I was "making no logical sense."
27. In truth, was your dialogue completely logical and coherent?
Answer: It was, yes. Entirely lucid and rational in every respect.
But I think it's important to understand that the wrongful referral to APS is part of a pattern that allows unjustified surveillance, falsified law enforcement reporting, and affiliated harm to accelerate. At this point, any interactions with law enforcement are an opportunity for AI-generated video and audio, along with officers' false claims, as directed by the FBI specifically.
28. And how does the FBI feel about its detractors?
Answer: Murderous, it is fair to say.
29. So what is the harm that Brandan Pesa, Tom Lyons, and their cohort have caused you and your family?
Answer: Incalculable. There really is no way to quantify the gratuitous and willful damage these men have caused.
30. Are they still directing the harm being perpetrated against your family members and yourself?
Answer: I believe so. These men are fairly desperate not to be caught, as is the FBI from an institutional perspective. They will go to any lengths to distract, defame, harm their victims, discredit their victims, etc. And unfortunately, we really need to comprehend that, to them, the territory of your life is the territory of their criminal impunity. They express a remorseless and unconscionable misogyny, and we saw this in the treatment of the USA gymnasts by the FBI, in the Epstein case, and in other cases.
Women are defamed as unstable, promiscuous, and dangerous to society -- qualities which can almost certainly be seen as a confession from the unstable, promiscuous and dangerous perpetrators of false reporting within the FBI.
31. What are the chances that we will be able to counter the scourge of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting at a later time?
Answer: The data centers that are being built all over the country, and indeed the world, should provide your answer to that question. We are now building the architecture of AI-generation, aggregation and dissemination of false information about all human beings, everywhere, in perpetuity.
We can see how difficult it is to obtain information through a simple FOIA request at this point, given that the FBI has effectively deconstructed the Freedom of Information Act through its own auspices.
If you persist in requesting responsive records, you are likely to experience what I am experiencing, which is extensive false reporting and predatory aggression from the FBI and its affiliates, including local law enforcement.
32. Has totalitarianism arrived?
Answer: We're watching it arrive, and we're aiding and abetting that process by not comprehending the larger systems of false reporting that are intended to remove all of our meaningful freedoms, without exception.
The data centers are partly serving worthy objectives for humanity, but the false information they are creating, aggregating and disseminating are by far the greater effect on human society in the future.
All of our innovation, creativity, educational advancement, technological prowess, insight, potential and genuine human bonds will be rendered moot by the effects of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.
That's the reason I am endeavoring to make this difference in asking the Illinois Attorney General's Office to insist on the provision of FOIA materials to me as soon as possible.
33. And you feel that that provision is possible, despite these astonishing headwinds.
Answer: Yes, it's possible.
34. Will you please keep in close contact with us given these new developments?
Answer: Yes, of course.
35. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
