1. What are your thoughts about the recent news of Kristi Noem's transition?
Answer: You know, I think the American public was understandably upset that neighbors of goodwill were being mischaracterized as "domestic terrorists" -- and this, well prior to any investigation of the deaths of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti.
We don't want the fact of an impartial investigation to imply opposition to federal authorities.
The public simply rejected that paradigm.
And this wholesale rejection was being felt in the polls, certainly.
2. You have received allegations from the FBI that your case is being used to fund ICE operations, and that other misappropriations are being perpetrated against your accounts at the directive of the President. May I know your perspective regarding this possibility?
Answer: I have made clear that my case should not be utilized to fund initiatives that deprive Americans of their human rights in any context and in any time frame. My case should not be funding ICE expansion, surveillance, reporting, training, deployment, operations, evacuations, ammunition, equipment or infrastructure.
Allegations of other misappropriations are also extremely concerning, and I would ask that any such initiatives be halted immediately, with the funds returned.
3. One of the specific allegations you received recently was that ICE was involved with the FBI in planning a staged car accident relating to you or a family member. May I please know your response?
Answer: The FBI has alleged significant tampering with my vehicle, as well as extending threats of a staged car accident. At this stage, all of that harm and planning for harm needs to be reversed and withdrawn.
4. Who has the ability to direct that those harms be reversed?
Answer: President Trump does, certainly.
5. How does the military view allegations that President Trump and Vladimir Putin, his close ally, may be extensively profiteering from misappropriations relating to your case?
Answer: Not favorably. They don't like this conduct. And even though there is assiduous care on the part of this administration to maintain consideration of the military, the military leadership understands that this level of corruption effectively dooms the sovereignty of the United States. And our worthiest military leaders are simply not in support of that.
6. Can funds allegedly misappropriated by President Trump be returned to the accounts from which they were wrongfully taken?
Answer: This is what needs now to occur.
7. Regarding the situation in Iran, you have expressed concern regarding possible retaliation on U.S. soil.
Answer: Many people have expressed that concern, I among them.
8. What do we need to be watchful about?
Answer: Russia has close ties to Iran, and Russia has close ties to President Trump. So, we need to be watchful of a staged sequence of events in which the U.S. could lose control of significant territory on both a short term and long term basis.
9. What could that loss of territory look like?
Answer: It could look like the use of non-conventional weapons over a valuable segment of the United States, resulting in the need for mass evacuations affecting millions of people. And that exodus may not be temporary.
10. If such a sequence of events were planned with the help of President Trump, which regions would be most vulnerable to such an attack?
Answer: Places where federal forces are notably absent at the current time. The President is not going to sacrifice valuable federal personnel to such a tragedy. So we would need to be looking at places where ICE is not currently present, and where the National Guard is not presently deployed.
11. And those would be?
Answer: Northern California leaps to mind, because President Trump made some unusually scripted announcements about why he was not sending troops into San Francisco. In general, Northern California is not particularly well defended by federal troops at this time. And this is uniquely valuable territory for our nation. The climate and the proximity to the West Coast make this a highly desirable and strategic area of national interest. Of course, Silicon Valley holds a great deal of human capital and intellectual property that render it a meaningful economic engine for the whole nation.
So, the enemies of U.S. sovereignty could focus on this area, unfortunately.
12. How would our military leadership feel about such a plan?
Answer: Highly displeased.
13. Would the details of such planning ever be publicly disclosed?
Answer: Two dozen Admirals and Generals were forced to resign prior to our aggression in Iran. So, I would say there would be a real chance of disclosure of behind-the-scenes planning.
14. Is significant territorial loss for the United States part of the FBI's mission and objectives?
Answer: Unfortunately, it is.
15. For what reason?
Answer: External pressures.
16. Are you able to identify those external pressures for us?
Answer: Not at this juncture.
17. What needs to occur at this time in order for your standards and expectations to be met?
Answer: Immediate outreach that is honorable and respectful, with all invasions of the accounts halted on an urgent basis.
18. What needs to happen regarding the manner in which your sons and daughter-in-law have been treated?
Answer: Wholesale change regarding the treatment of my loved ones.
19. What needs to happen regarding certain financial predations against your family members and yourself?
Answer: Immediate reimbursements and a cessation of all targeting.
20. What needs to happen regarding harm to your children's health, your pets' health, your own health?
Answer: Immediate and unequivocal restoration, without further harm.
21. How might the American public respond to proof that an American President colluded in the historic harm of the nation?
Answer: With unprecedented indignation.
22. Are such revelations now possible?
Answer: Highly possible, yes.
23. You are determined to protect funds awarded in your case so that the enemies of United States sovereignty do not abscond with those resources. Is that correct?
Answer: It most certainly is.
24. Can a rogue administration be held to account?
Answer: Most certainly, it can.
25. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
