My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Thursday, July 23, 2026

Request for Intervention: Are American Drivers Caught in the FBI's Game of Matchbox Cars?

1.  You spoke to George who is a manager at AutoNation for Mercedes Benz in San Jose a few minutes ago.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  This relates to a 2023 Mercedes Benz EQS 450 4Matic which you purchased in December of 2025, seven months ago.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes.

3.  What did you express to George regarding your vehicle?

Answer:  I communicated to him the fact that the facilitated hacks regarding the operating software of the vehicle have repeatedly placed my life at risk.

4.  How has that manifested?

Answer:  The navigation system is hacked to the extent that destination replacement has occurred multiple times en route to a destination.  So, without my knowledge, in the middle of my receiving directions, a third party has rerouted the car to somewhere I don't want to go, and a location about which I have no information whatsoever.

For someone who routinely receives kidnapping threats, that represents a serious problem.

5.  How have you adapted to this remarkable flaw in the vehicle's safety?

Answer:  I have to be constantly vigilant.  I have lost all trust in Mercedes Benz overall, given the company's failure to respond to my outreach.  So, I just need to check and re-check and re-check that I am heading to the right destination via a reasonable route.

6.  Does the navigation system sometimes route you to destinations via unsafe roads?

Answer:  Absolutely.  I have received notification that I will be routed to an easily accessible destination through restricted areas and unpaved roads, for example.  Obviously, in that case, I have not followed the vehicle's routing in any manner.  But the potential for harm is astonishing.

7.  Are there other allegations of alterations to the software of the vehicle?

Answer:  I can attest to the fact that my remote access to vehicle controls such as door locking and climate control has been completely blocked.  These features are simply not operational.  And this matters because others should not be accessing my vehicle when I am away from it, obviously.  Further, my dogs should be able to remain in an air conditioned vehicle for five minutes if I am at a rest stop while traveling.

Further allegations of harm to the vehicle are yet more serious, as they pertain to compromise of the adaptive cruise control system, and are accompanied by threats that acceleration, braking, and steering could all be altered at speed, on a freeway, for example, leading to intentional fatality.

8.  To what extent are the changes to your own car's operating system reflective of changes to the operating systems of all Mercedes Benz vehicles?

Answer:  This is a critical question.  In general, when the FBI pays affiliates, as it has paid both AutoNation and Mercedes Benz, to make alterations that allow the FBI to have life and death control over Americans, the harm is broad-based.  I would suspect that the changes have been made to all Mercedes Benz vehicles because of this pattern of conduct.  The software updates to Mercedes Benz vehicles are automatically uploaded, with no involvement from car owners.  So this harm could have easily been disseminated without any awareness on the part of consumers whatsoever.

9.  Do you believe that other car companies may have been convinced to participate in similar compromise due to FBI guidance?

Answer:  Yes, I do.  I think this compromise is highly likely to have affected many other car manufacturers.

10.  What is the impact on Americans if this is true?

Answer:  The FBI can kill you whenever it wants to do so, simply by taking control of your vehicle remotely at a point in time it determines.

11.  That would represent an astonishing violation of Americans' sovereignty and Constitutional rights.

Answer:  Yes, it would.  We have seen prior FBI incursions into this realm when it convinced Congress to pass "kill switch" requirements in all vehicles, allowing law enforcement to turn off the ignition of any vehicle at any time at the independent determination of law enforcement officers.  This represents a tremendous safety risk to the public when our law enforcement represents an increasingly violent and predatory contingent, violating the public's freedoms with absolute impunity.

And this is not to say that we don't have honorable law enforcement officers.

But how safe is your lovely sixteen year old daughter returning from prom with her new driver's license when local law enforcement can kill the ignition of her vehicle at will?

The problems are all lamentably foreseeable.  And they place the public interest in stark opposition to law enforcement's prerogatives.

Americans' cars should not be treated like remote-control Matchbox toys, in which the fate of the public becomes concealed entertainment for a predatory FBI.

12.  What should happen at this juncture with regard to your own safety?

Answer:  I would respectfully request an investigation of this matter by the OIG Hotline, to involve the aggregation of all FBI communications with AutoNation and Mercedes Benz regarding the intentional compromise of the software of my Mercedes Benz vehicle, as well as other Americans' Mercedes Benz vehicles.  All judgments against Mercedes Benz, AutoNation, the FBI, and specific employees of these three organizations should be deposited into the Foundation I have specified for the preservation of Americans' long term sovereignty.

If I had open communication with the OIG Hotline, I would request that a series of independent software experts examine my car in detail to determine the source of the problems described herewith, and any other problems involved.

In the absence of that, Mercedes Benz should refund the vehicle and cooperate in every way with the investigative team to facilitate this inquiry.

No American wants to buy a car that will knowingly place their life at risk or endanger the lives of their loved ones.

There is no business model for such a car manufacturer and there never will be.

13.  Did George indicate a willingness to refund your vehicle's purchase price given the unacceptable risks to your safety caused by the car's compromise?

Answer:  No, he did not.  In fact, he emphatically conveyed that he did not care what happened to customers after they purchased cars from AutoNation.

14.  Did it seem to you that George was taking a payoff from the FBI directly?

Answer:  George struck me as genuinely callous, even without the FBI's influence, but yes, I think he was taking a payoff, too.

George not only does not appear to care whether his customers die after driving off the lot with their new Mercedes Benz purchase, but may believe further that his profiteering is worth their demise.

15.  You recently listed "safety in transportation" as one of the key components of the preservation of the sovereignty of Americans in the long term.  Is your astonishing experience with AutoNation and Mercedes Benz one of the reasons why?

Answer:  Without question.  In the long term, we cannot accept that the FBI can kill our loved ones or ourselves in the guise of an auto accident at any time they so choose.  The agency is not wise enough to make those life and death determinations, and we never want to pretend that it is worthy of that authority.

16.  Will you please keep in close communication with us, given these revelations regarding improper FBI alliances with car manufacturers?

Answer:  Yes, I will.  Of course.

17.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Awards Addressing FBI Misconduct Are Exempt from Tax

OIG Hotline, all awards extended to me in the adjudication of my case are exempt from state and federal tax, as are all such judgments.

Therefore, I request that your Office insist that "taxes" or graft not be allowed to be withdrawn from my account for any reason.

Rather, as I have requested, awards should be deposited in a Foundation for the preservation of Americans' long term sovereignty.

I will also point out that "parallel cases" represent a direct threat to the sovereignty of the nation if "taxes" are allowed to be skimmed from awards designated through concealed adjudication.  I have asked that these judgments also be deposited in the Foundation I have specified for American sovereignty due to the fact that misappropriations from these accounts by our foreign adversaries can, in and of themselves, result in the end of our nation's self-determination.

These details are critical to our future capacity to defend our national interests.

Thank you for your support regarding this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails to your Office.  Please note that this list is not complete.


  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Awards Addressing FBI Misconduct Are Exempt from Tax, sent at 4:31 AM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, July 22, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 4:18 AM Central Daylight Time.

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Time Is of the Essence

 OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to suggest that the agency is forging documents in my handwriting at this time, with unknown content.  Please know that, other than grocery lists and sundries lists, I am not engaging in handwritten documentation at this time.

My holographic Will was provided to your Office, dated December 11, 2025, and has not been updated since that time.

I may endeavor to update that documentation on my return to my home state of California, but I will inform you of those details publicly through this blog if I do so.

Otherwise, please know that I am not handwriting letters, messages, codes, hieroglyphs, fingerpaintings, directives, maps or gifts.

Please be aware that, when I was visiting Canada, I submitted electronic fingerprint scans and a fingerprint card as part of a quest for falsified documentation originating from the FBI as well its Canadian affiliates.  This search returned nothing whatsoever, but my provision of fingerprints could certainly now be knowingly misused by the agency for the purposes of falsified "evidence" in a knowingly corrupted investigation.

It may be important to know that my family members are experiencing increasing pressure to sign knowingly false witness statements regarding my family, including the FBI's perpetration of torture methods against my children and daughter-in-law, and threats of forced job loss and arrest toward all of my family members and myself.

Food and water deprivation, along with deprivation of medical care, is allegedly being perpetrated against my children and daughter-in-law, as are other alleged harms.

Allegations of forged threats, as well as AI-generated audio and video of events that never transpired, are abundant, as are allegations of forged financial allocations. 

Any financial designations will be published publicly by me on my blog, as well as documented for you via email.  Having said that, at this time, financial allocations specified by me in defense of the sovereignty of the American people should briefly pause.

I am not extending small-dollar donations to my favorite charities at this time, because I do not wish for them to be mischaracterized.  Once materials have been provided to me, I intend to reclaim my right to donate as a lawful citizen of the United States.

Accordingly, it seems most appropriate to act expeditiously in the provision of any and all materials to me relating to my case at this time.

If sequential provisions of materials will expedite the provision of an initial tranche, I hope this approach will be implemented.  While certainly the provision of all materials at the earliest possible time is best, any substantive provision of documentation will of necessity alter the FBI's approach to this issue.

Therefore, time is of the essence.

This is to reconfirm that all of my conduct, communications, activities, tv/cable/internet viewing, reading, and cell phone and computer content and use have been and continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form, reflecting the highest character and integrity at all times and in all settings.

I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully and categorically false.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

 

OIG Hotline, please see the communication below from the San Mateo County Elections Office, stating that my vote "was NOT contested or challenged at any point."

Note that in an earlier email, included below, from Oxxx xxxxxxx, he states that, while my ballot was received on May 27, 2026, it was "ultimately counted," suggesting a delay due to a challenge of some kind.

OIG Hotline, I strongly suspect that your Office knows all too well about the details of an unjustified challenge to the validity of my vote in the California June 2, 2026 election.

Mr. xxxxx's confirmation that my vote was uncontested and counted should put any concealed challenges to rest on an immediate basis.

Any funds that were misappropriated due to an unjustified challenge to my vote should be immediately returned to the Foundation.

The FBI appears to claim that total funds in the Foundation should now be at least 131 T.

What is the larger voting concern for the nation?

The overwhelming concern is that county voting registrars have apparently been compromised by the FBI, which is contesting certain voters' ballots in a concealed manner about which the voters are never informed.  Have county voting registrar personnel signed agreements with the FBI?  Almost certainly, they have.  Have they accepted compensation in any form from the FBI?  Almost assuredly, yes.

Highly significant are the FBI claims that these disqualifications of votes occurred in the last nationwide election.

For reference, the FBI is functioning identically to the Mob at this point, which is to say that once someone has signed a contract or accepted compensation from the agency, they cannot "leave."  Accordingly, voting registrar personnel, likely nationwide, must be considered to be compromised at this time.  At least a portion of them are being asked to disqualify honorable Americans' votes in a concealed manner, in violation of state and federal elections laws, and in abrogation of the Constitution.  And they are being paid to do so, and told that they are serving a "national security objective" through their compliance.

The implications of loss of American sovereignty, in which Vladimir Putin and A.'s cadre are effectively controlling many if not most U.S. political outcomes, is all too clear.

What would it take to correct this issue?

Open assessment of the damage.

A concealed process of new rules, regulations, statutes, laws, and judicial rulings, created by the DOJ, the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court, will be insufficient to the challenge at hand with regard to voting security, for the simple reason that the architecture of voting compromise is already in place.  The FBI will not relinquish this hold over the American electorate willingly or silently.

Instead, journalists would need to be informed of the damage to American elections, and an independent commission would be needed to document the contractual status with the FBI of each and every elections employee connected to County Voting Registrars.  Have voting day volunteers and staffers also been directed by the FBI to report "suspicious" or felonious behavior on the part of a portion of voters on Election Day?  Has this information also been used to disqualify votes?  My own experience would suggest that this is highly likely.

If an open process examining this compromise cannot be undertaken, will the United States be unable to unmake the architecture of voting control in the future?

Not if falsified law enforcement reporting remains in place, no.  These two areas of compromise are closely related.  As long as the FBI is lying about honorable Americans, election compromise is likely to remain.  

Convicted felons are at risk of permanent loss of voting rights, and that includes Americans who have no idea the FBI has convicted them of felonies in secret, consisting of crimes of which they have no knowledge.  In addition, FBI claims of "voter fraud" in the face of name, legal residency, or identification misspellings or misinformation directed by the agency itself are also unknown to voters, and concealed upon their direct inquiry, as evidenced herewith.

(Redacted content including recommendations.)

Thank you for allowing me to extend these serious concerns to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

****************************************************

Sent to Lane MacWilliams from the San Mateo County Elections Office, July 20, 2026 at 9:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time.

Lane,

Your vote was NOT contested or challenged at any point.

Sincerely,

xxxxxx xxxxx

Elections Specialist III

San Mateo County Elections Office

40 Tower Road San Mateo, CA 94402




 






Sunday, July 19, 2026

When the FBI Directs that Americans' Votes Be Contested in Concealment

 1.  The FBI appears to be urging you to travel home to California even while there is an alleged "death squad" threat against your life.  Do you have any comment to make about the agency in this regard?

Answer:  Well, I think those two things are entirely consistent.  The agency has obtained some corrupt death sentence based on knowingly falsified evidence from Tom Lyons, and now is urging me to travel through states which are thoroughly under FBI control in order to carry out that sentence.

2.  What is your response to that stratagem?

Answer:  My response is no.  If the agency has shown itself to be so corrupt as to arrange for a wrongful death sentence against me, then I cannot be expected to travel across country while incurring additional risk to my safety and security.

I shouldn't have to die to prove that I am a California resident.

When the agency apologizes and vacates its wrongful convictions against my loved ones and myself, then I will be free to travel home to California on my chosen schedule, like a free and sovereign American citizen.

3.  There are FBI allegations that xxxxxx xxxxx of the San Mateo County Voting Registrar's Office in California has lied to you about counting your vote in the June 2, 2026 election, and possibly in previous elections.

Answer:  Yes, there are.

4.  What appears to have happened here?

Answer:  It appears that the FBI has been in direct communication with the San Mateo County Voting Registrar's Office, along with many other county voting registrars, in order to contest and invalidate lawful votes in a concealed manner, without notifying voters, in stark violation of the the Constitution and state and federal elections laws.

In my particular case, there appears to be an intent to profiteer through a wrongful allegation of voter fraud, so this instance is particularly egregious.

5.  xxxxxx xxxxx stated in writing that your vote was counted in the June 2, 2026 California election, didn't he?

Answer:  Yes, he did.  I have asked him a few more questions about whether my vote was ever contested or challenged, and I am waiting for his response at this point.

6.  What do you expect that response to be?

Answer:  It had better be the truth.

If he states that my vote was contested, then he needs to provide the information to me, in accordance with California state law.  He also needs to explain why he previously lied to me about this matter, in violation of all voting standards and requirements.

If he states that it was not contested, then everyone needs to withdraw false allegations of voter fraud and relinquish all claims on awards extended to me in my case against the FBI through the U.S. DOJ.

Either way, this is an enormous issue for the American people and the nation as a whole.

7.  May I ask why?

Answer:  Because when the FBI is contesting and invalidating certain votes without informing the honorable electorate, there is no democratic process whatsoever.

8.  Before the last federal election, President Trump was openly talking about the importance of the manner in which the votes were counted.  Is this what he was referring to?

Answer:  Apparently, it was.  It seems that the FBI has been manifesting this scheme for quite some time, certainly including the last federal election.  FBI directives to county voting registrars have stood in complete defiance of state laws governing elections, and in complete contradiction of Constitutional law.  In other words, we have not experienced free and fair elections for at least two years.

9.  Who directed this alleged election interference?

Answer:  We will likely see heavy involvement on the part of the FBI and its affiliate agencies.  But mainly, this violation of our most fundamental democratic freedoms is being directed by Russia at this time, along with A.'s cadre.  There is a strong push toward "one world government," and that is the origin of this loss of our fundamental sovereignty as a nation.

10.  Who directed xxxxxx xxxxx of the San Mateo County Voting Registrar to lie to you about your vote being counted in the June 2, 2026 California election?

Answer:  This was likely to be Tom Lyons, President Trump, and other FBI personnel and affiliates.

11.  And the purpose was to profiteer on the basis of knowingly false allegations of voter fraud?  

Answer:  Allegedly so, yes.  I repeatedly asked xxxxxx xxxxx and others in the San Mateo County Voting Registrar's Office about my voting documentation and my ability to cast a lawful vote in the June 2, 2026 election, specifically due to the proposed SAVE Act, and I was repeatedly reassured that everything was in order.

So, if my vote was contested without my being informed, then the intent was clearly to profiteer in a concealed manner from knowingly false allegations.

12.  The President just gave a speech on voter integrity last Thursday.  What are your thoughts about his comments to the American people?

Answer:  We need to be able to comprehend that the message of the speech can be distilled to one sentence to the whole of the nation:  "Your elections are not secure."  And that appears to be exactly correct.  Our elections are not secure, though not for the reasons that have been described to us heretofore.

13.  On what basis were the President and Tom Lyons allegedly trying to invalidate your vote?

Answer:  My married name is different from my birth name, which is the problem with the SAVE Act for millions of American women.

And beyond this, I have been traveling away from my home for a few months, despite the fact that California is still my lawful residence.  So, there was allegedly an attempt to invalidate my vote based on false accusations that I had permanently moved.

14.  Have you permanently moved?

Answer:  No.  I am staying in hotels while I am traveling, like most people do.  That is not a permanent situation, I assure you.

15.  Yet, you cannot travel back to your home state of California while there is a "death squad ruling" against you, for alleged crimes of which you have no knowledge.

Answer:  No, I'm not willing to take that risk.

Even now, the FBI alleges that it placed a car bomb in my Volkswagen Atlas rental vehicle, along with perpetrating other sabotage to the car.

And my MB EQS 450 allegedly has an adaptive cruise control system that has been hacked to allow remote third-party activation, with an intent to cause a fatal accident.

So the risks are quite extreme even when I'm not traveling long distances.

16.  Will you publicly share with us the response to your questions of xxxxxx xxxxx and the San Mateo County Voting Registrar's Office?

Answer: Yes, I will.  And I am happy to share my email asking for further explanation beforehand.

17.  What is your response to the FBI's claim that it needed to take control of U.S. elections due to certain crises that the United States is facing geopolitically?

Answer:  It is clear to me that we are experiencing functional martial law at this time in the United States, given the sovereignty violations being perpetrated against the public at large.

But if the FBI wishes to explain to me why it needed to remove free and fair elections for the American people in perpetuity, the agency can certainly choose an intermediary to articulate that point of view on an immediate basis.

18.  What other concerns do you have regarding this matter, which is so critical to the future of human sovereignty?

Answer:  I have concerns that concealed invalidation of lawful votes may also have been perpetrated internationally, simultaneously shifting many governments to the far right worldwide.

19.  What is your assessment of that likelihood?

Answer:  The FBI and its affiliates, such as the CIA, are following parallel policy manifestations at this time.  I would assess the likelihood of compromise of other nations' elections on the same basis of improperly invalidated votes to be above 80 percent based on the simultaneity of rightward shifts politically around the world.

20.  What should happen to misappropriations of funds relating to your case against the FBI?

Answer:  They need to be returned and deposited into the Foundation I have designated for the preservation of Americans' long term sovereignty.

Funds awarded through derivative cases should also be deposited in the Foundation as a matter of course.

21.  What are the current threats to your safety through exacerbations of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?

Answer:  They are quite high in that I am experiencing stalking behavior, almost certainly connected to false witness statements, nearly everywhere I go.  Online impersonation, false messaging, and other falsified "evidence" are almost certainly part of that FBI misconduct, as previously.

22.  What would make the most decisive difference to your safety and security at this time?

Answer:  Provision of full information to me through the Freedom of Information Act or state information statutes.

23.  Will you please keep in close contact with us regarding your correspondence with xxxxxx xxxxx and the San Mateo County Voting Registrar?

Answer:  Yes, I will.

24.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams



Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office.  Please note that this list is not complete.

July 22, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Reiterating the Most Appropriate Response to Tom Lyons' and Brandan Pesa's Alleged Genetic Theft, sent at 11:23 AM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Unsafe and Unclean Hotels, sent at 7:42 AM and 11:33 AM Central Daylight Time.

July 21, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINERe: Fwd: Request for a Signed Statement, sent at 9:19 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Warning of Falsified Threats, Falsified Audio, Falsified Video, etc., sent at 9:21 AM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Health Update, July 21, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 6:10 AM and 6:37 AM Central Daylight Time.


July 20, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as possible, sent at 10:10 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, July 20, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 2:00 PM  and 10:28 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 3:12 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, July 19/20, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 3:01 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Corrected July 20, 2026 Update Re: Fwd: Questions for the San Mateo County Voting Registrar's Office Re: Confirmation of June 2, 2026 Uncontested and Counted Ballot, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 3:00 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Laundry, Residence Inn, July 20, 2026, sent at 11:17 AM and 3:07 PM Central Daylight Time.


July 19, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: GTM Texts, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:24 AM Central Daylight Time.


July 18, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Current Security Concerns, sent at 7:25 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Re: Fwd: Questions for the San Mateo County Voting Registrar's Office Re: Confirmation of June 2, 2026 Uncontested and Counted Ballot, sent at 5:29 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: LM to Prioritize and Integrate with..., sent at 3:16 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Injunctive Relief Re: Parallel Cases Involving Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting, sent at 2:15 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Poppy and Birdie, sent at 12:51 PM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Intervention, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:05 PM and 12:10 PM, Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as possible, sent at 11:44 AM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: My Assessment of the Foundation, July 18, 2026, sent at 11:09 AM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Potential Email and/or Blog Compromise, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:02 AM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 12:19 AM Central Daylight Time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Pertaining to July 17, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:15 AM Central Daylight Time.