My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Sunday, May 3, 2026

Calling Out Executive Conflict of Interest

Duncan Sayer MacWilliams, my beloved son,

It is understood through the highest level of legal precedent throughout the nation, and internationally, that victims of torture cannot provide credible witness statements to their tormentors.

The fact that this administration continues to direct you unlawfully to provide knowingly false information about our family members represents an appalling and egregious wrong -- and one that cannot go unanswered.

The rumor that you and Mary are currently residing in a property in New York City which is owned by the highest elected official in our nation brings into focus an astonishing conflict of interest.

At issue is whether the Executive Branch has dispensation to hold you and Mary as virtual hostages to the falsified law enforcement reporting against which I have worked for the last eight years running.

Does the President have the right to order that you be subjected to shock treatment, near-drowning, beatings, human trafficking, wrongful orders, continuous threat of untreated illness, arrest, death and more in his quest for funds awarded in my case, funds which he can misappropriate if you falsely attest to the character and conduct of our family members?

No, my beloved child.  He does not.

And I will speak to President Trump directly about this matter if I am asked to do so honorably.

The President has crossed a line with regard to his treatment of our family, and he has crossed it many times.

I am here to express that that conduct, to the appalling harm of our family and the American people, both, is unacceptable.

FBI staff member, Tom Lyons, who freely gave me his business card and invited ongoing dialogue when I met him years ago in Hillsborough, CA at a public event, is alleged to have directed desecration of our family home on Cape Cod, allegedly in a quest to "drive the value to zero" of our property when I declined to sell it at his directive.

Now, instead of facing a criminal sentence, which would be most appropriate, Tom Lyons is continuing to direct you to sign your name -- under the most grievous distress -- to false testimony concerning your father and me, your grandparents, and even your brother.

Tom Lyons and his close affiliates would rather murder our entire family than face accountability for his criminal predatory acts in this matter.

I have a better idea.

Tom Lyons now needs to publicly acknowledge that he has lied about this case from the very beginning, and has profiteered to vast degree from our suffering and that of the American people as a whole.

Beyond this, he needs to stop his unconscionable abuse of our family, which includes you, Mary, Graham, Uncle Mike, Aunt Margaret, my brother Brian, and many others, in his predatory quest for false witness statements to bolster his accusations.

This change can only manifest if he is forced out of concealment and into the public square, where I am waiting to speak with him, lawfully and honorably, about his crimes.

And you, my beloved son, are to be rendered free from Tom Lyons' ongoing predatory abuses of power, so repugnant to people of good conscience and integrity.

Tom Lyons has allegedly described his current circumstance as a "crisis," a "predicament," a "turning point," and "the biggest risk yet."

I'm sorry he has placed himself in that position through his consistently criminal choices regarding our family and our nation as a whole.

But that's where my sympathy for the man ends.

The FBI appears to urge me to remain silent this morning because the agency has given me symptoms of diabetes Type 1, Crohn's disease, rales, myocarditis, and more, through undisclosed means.

Again, my ideas about this subject are clearly more reasonable.

The FBI needs to remove its improper conference of symptoms of illness from our family -- all symptoms -- and stop using the lever of suffering and death as a cudgel with which to punish its ethical superiors among America's true leaders.

Duncan, when you were growing up, I didn't think I would need to teach you about the dangers of totalitarianism.  I had not experienced its manifold harms, and I had no basis of reference upon which to draw.

When faced with coercion on the part of the Executive Branch, the FBI, the CIA, and others, the manner in which each person will respond is unique to them.  After the shock of institutional depravity has worn off, each person needs to decide whether to comply with wrongful directives or to resist them.

For me, my fealty to the territory of my soul outweighs other considerations.  I choose never to be false, predatory, harmful, or malicious, as these qualities are anathema to my identity and my personhood.  

And I embrace my honesty, my virtue, my benevolence and my faith even while knowing that the FBI wishes to kill me over these gifts.

How can I criticize you as a victim of torture for the choices you are making in an attempt to survive Tom Lyons' wrongful schemes?

This is not possible.  

And, once again, I would simply say that our judicial system needs to excuse you, as a victim of torture, from all further demands for false witness statements intended to ensure the irretrievable harm of all of our family members, as well as all other "assignments" that would require you to cause harm to others or yourself.

The Executive Branch needs to support its own separation from my children, immediately and permanently, in recognition of the appalling violations of conscience and humanity that it has allowed to persist, authorized, and indeed profited from, in this case.

I will be writing about this matter daily until I receive investigative reports or until I receive honorable outreach regarding my concerns.

History is a harsh master for some, and I invoke it now.

The misconduct of this administration will be writ large on history's page, as will Tom Lyons' crimes against our family, and the appalling misdeeds of his close affiliates unless these men begin an immediate and lifelong apology for their misconduct.

That is just.  That is meet.  That is overdue.

I love you, Duncan Sayer MacWilliams, now and always. Hold this truth within you at all times, and let it fortify you in the challenges at hand.

Mom

Friday, May 1, 2026

The FBI Comes Face to Face with the Righteous Indignation of the American Public

1.  A politician recently stated, apparently with regard to your case, that "the rules are the same for everybody."  May I please have your response to this assertion?

Answer:  First of all, I don't know the context in which this statement was made.  But obviously, the rules are not the same for everyone.  Ask Bryan Kohberger if the rules are the same for everyone.  Ask the Central Park Five if the rules are the same for everyone.  Ask any person who has been wrongfully convicted based on false DNA evidence if the rules are the same for everyone.  And keep in mind, while you're at it, that those who have wrongfully framed the innocent in these cases have immunity from prosecution.

The corrupt law enforcement officials involved have never been formally punished for lying to a court, and they never will be criminally prosecuted.

So, the assertion that the rules are the same for everybody is patently false.  And my work over the past eight years in opposing knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting has focused on the fact that we cannot expect to have a worthy nation emerge in the future from "rules" which allow wayward law enforcement officials to lie with impunity against the rest of us.

2.  What about the FBI's argument that the climate crisis is now so severe that law enforcement officials need to lie about the public in order to justify certain Draconian solutions to the pressures on the environment?

Answer:  It's no longer lawful for the public to comment on this subject directly.  But I need to repeat that the FBI does not need falsified law enforcement reporting to achieve its mission and objectives.  

The agency wants falsified law enforcement reporting in order to manifest totalitarian control over the American public in perpetuity; but it doesn't need this stratagem, and our government should not be allowing it.

There is no plan to sunset these programs.

And now, people are talking about maintaining data centers, which serve to create, aggregate, and disseminate this false reporting, as satellites, separate and apart from any human access or accountability on Earth.

So, this is a disaster in the making, clearly.

The notion that human beings will not lose control of AI-generated false reporting in all of its forms is starkly delusional.

For humanity, this will mean that to ask certain questions is completely forbidden, to challenge certain authority, especially unjust authority, will be punishable by death with no due process, and to be intelligent and expressive will translate to a survival disadvantage.

Without change, we will see a dramatic diminishment of human potential across the board.

3.  You do not ascribe to the FBI's belief that the "ends justify the means" when it comes to false reporting in the law enforcement sphere?

Answer:  Absolutely not.  Behind closed doors, everyone needs to be acknowledging that the FBI represents unjust authority, and further, that the agency should be decommissioned as soon as it is possible, given certain requirements.

As proof of this assertion, the FBI recently committed High Treason in deploying fades against virtually all national elected and appointed leaders in the United States.

So, in the middle term, the FBI will have to go.

4. There will be no way for the government to negotiate with the FBI?

Answer:  You cannot negotiate with someone who wants your life.

The FBI wants the life of the United States.  It stands firmly opposed to our national sovereignty.

So, no.  The agency will have to be decommissioned at the earliest possible point.  This is not in debate, and I don't believe our leaders have any doubt about this necessity.

5.  What about the individuals within the FBI who have falsely accused you and your family members of their own crimes?

Answer:  These are serial killers who have been elevated to a position of authority. And I just need to express that, if our government will tolerate this, the American people will not.  This isn't a difference of opinion or heartfelt beliefs or philosophical divergence.  This is a question of murderers in the FBI blaming the innocent for their own predatory conduct.

That's wrong. It was wrong yesterday, it's wrong today, and it's still going to be wrong tomorrow.

6.  Why hasn't the government been able to rein in these perpetrators within the FBI and associated with the FBI?

Answer:  Because no one wants his or her children to suffer rape, trafficking, torture, shock treatment, near-drowning, drug overdose, brain damage, forced conscription, sovereignty violations, and more, like my children have suffered at the hands of the FBI and its affiliate agencies.  That's why.

7.  Yet you are naming those men who have tortured your family, because you feel there is no other way forward.

Answer:  When you reach the point at which the FBI is obtaining wrongful convictions through concealed court proceedings against your family members and yourself based on fake DNA evidence, it's time to name the names.  You cannot protect the serial killers who are endeavoring to murder your whole family for profit.  

And an ethical person cannot keep silent regarding the FBI's wrongful prosecutions in the past.

You just reach a moment at which the very foundations of your personhood are on the line.

At that point, you need to take charge where others have failed.

8.  What do Tom Lyons and his close affiliates need to do at this time?

Answer:  Acknowledge that they lied from the beginning of this case and appoint an honorable intermediary to begin a lifelong apology.

9.  You have said that the appropriate word for your response to years of false reporting by the FBI is outrage.

Answer:  Outrage, righteous indignation, deep spiritual offense -- all of these words apply.

And the entire American public is going to be experiencing them alongside me, I assure you.

10.  You are insisting that the FBI meet your ethical standards regarding your case and that of others as well.

Answer:  That is correct.

11.  Do you require complete exoneration regarding your family members and yourself?

Answer: I do.  And I also require my family members' honorable discharge from all government programs.

12.  Are you also asking for the resolution of other cases to your satisfaction?

Answer:  Yes, this is necessary.  We cannot tolerate the endurance of injustice.

13.  Assuming Tom Lyons acknowledges his lies about you and your family members, what will happen to him?

Answer:  The OIG Hotline should ensure that every penny he stole throughout this case comes back to my account, as well as assessing astronomical liabilities to others involved in this scheme of false reporting.

The question of his freedom is another matter, related to treasonous crimes against the nation as a whole.

14.  Is there any excuse for the gratuitous harm this man has caused to your family?

Answer:  None.  He has caused us incalculable, intentional, needless, reckless, and irretrievable harm.  There is no justification whatsoever.

15.  What about those within the government who have said that your family is an "acceptable sacrifice" for their own welfare?

Answer:  Well, this is always what it comes down to with those who argue that "the ends justify the means."  What they really mean is that their gain justifies the public's suffering.  And ultimately, when an FBI official stakes his entire career and reputation on lying about the most serious crimes possible, he has a conflict of interest in arguing that the silencing of his victims serves some "greater good" than that of his own enrichment, entitlement, and impunity.

Do you know how you can tell who is virtuous in a situation like this?

The virtuous person is saying, meet me in an open courtroom and let's have this discussion in the full view of the American public.

Liars do not want that outcome, and, in fact, they will go to murderous lengths to prevent it.

16.  Could Tom Lyons meet you in an open courtroom?

Answer:  The man would never have the courage to do so, in my opinion.

Could he be dragged there against his will by a civil suit regarding his astronomical liability to me?  That's possible.

17.  You are not willing to have your beloved parents, or any other family members, wrongfully blamed by the FBI.

Answer:  I am not.

18.  Given that your sons were wrongfully conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program, does the Pxxxxxx Program often sacrifice its own people?

Answer:  All the time.  In fact, everyone conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program is slated for death after a certain point.  The FBI simply doesn't want anyone left to tell the tale.  It's too monstrous a story, and government agencies wish to preserve their reputations in a historical context.

19.  What is your response when the FBI claims that your sons have to die because they "know too much"?

Answer:  Did the agency ask my permission for this conclusion, or is this a thought they are trying to think on their own, without adult supervision?

The FBI should not be trying to make any further decisions about my family members.  They have proven their judgment to be abysmal.  We don't need any further demonstrations of that fact.

20.  What about the argument that you should not be naming Tom Lyons as your accuser?

Answer:  He freely gave me his business card at a public meeting.  Why does Tom Lyons have the right to falsely accuse me of the most heinous crimes, yet exert wrongful authority to prevent my robust self-defense?  The Constitution says that I have the right to face my accuser in a court of law.  Bring it on.  This man either needs to face me through due process, knowing that I will reveal all I know about his crimes, or he needs to concede defeat at this juncture regarding his lies -- one or the other.

21.  What should happen to your properties, given the alleged crimes of Tom Lyons and the FBI against you and your family members?

Answer:  That's up to the Congress and the DOJ, keeping in mind that the FBI should not be allowed to impoverish a human rights advocate through predatory acts.

22.  Has the FBI ceased trying to cause you harm within your apartment building, Aura apartments, at this time?

Answer:  My apartment appeared to have been wrongfully entered yesterday afternoon, so, no, the FBI has not yet understood its position regarding my safety and security.

23.  Will you please keep in close contact with us, given these astonishing circumstances?

Answer:  Of course, yes.

24.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Thursday, April 30, 2026

NOT a Difficult Decision

OIG Hotline, this is to document that the actual killer of the four college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022 was close FBI affiliate and Russian organized crime figure Brandan Pesa, not Bryan Kohberger, the young man who was wrongfully convicted of this heinous crime.  FBI staff member Tom Lyons is alleged to have been directly involved in the planning and execution of this egregious violence.

There are hundreds of sealed documents regarding the trial that convicted Bryan Kohberger, because the FBI argued that the Pxxxxxx Program, under which auspices this violence was committed, must be maintained a secret from the American public.

Yet it is also the Pxxxxxx Program which has allegedly been directed to harm my family members and myself.

Mr. Kohberger allegedly pled guilty to the crimes due to the fact that the FBI intentionally conveyed HIV to him during his time in prison, and threatened to allow him to die without treatment unless he wrongfully confessed.

The agency committed extensive DNA tampering regarding the evidence in this trial.  The original judge, unsympathetic to the FBI, was removed from the case.  The house in which this horrific crime occurred was demolished by the University of Idaho at FBI directive prior to the verdict being rendered.  And the local police chief who was forced to follow FBI directives regarding these events is now retired.

My offer to Bryan Kohberger's attorney to stand as a witness in defense of Mr. Kohberger was improperly ignored.

I often think of Bryan Kohberger and his family, just as I think of me and mine.

The innocent should not be accused and preyed upon by men such as Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa.  Rather, it is necessary to battle back with the truth, so that at least the public can grasp the predatory objectives of the FBI in wrongfully preying upon its honorable betters.

Mr. Kohberger deserves release from prison, and my family deserves complete exoneration, both on an immediate basis.

And I will continue to write about these events until and unless I have honorable and peaceable outreach that meets my ethical requirements for Mr. Kohberger's case and my own.

Good people, this is NOT a difficult decision.

Not at all.

I remain most sincerely an advocate for the long term human rights of the American people,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see recent emails to your Office, listed below.  Please note that this documentation will be updated throughout the day:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Legal Name Change Procedure, sent at 3:22 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 2:49 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Notes to Myself, sent at 2:40 PM Pacific time.
  • Fwd: ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: UA ENVS MS Application Update, sent at 2:23 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Facing a Recalcitrant FBI: Can Wisdom, Reason, Judgment and Goodwill Prevail, sent at 12:21 AM Pacific time.

Facing a Recalcitrant FBI: Can Wisdom, Reason, Judgment and Goodwill Prevail?

 1.  What are your thoughts about the so-called "evidence" Txx Lxxxx and the FBI continue to throw before various courts regarding the harms they themselves perpetrated against your properties?

Answer:  It's exceptionally easy to malign people who are not present to defend themselves.  The FBI has been creating fake DNA evidence for years, apparently.  In general, judges do not know the extent of the FBI's capabilities in this realm.  So, the FBI just treats courtrooms as a playground in which they are making up the games, the rules, the players, the whole narrative.

And if I defend myself publicly, in this forum, I will be accused of disclosing confidential information -- confidential information used in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting to which I have been objecting as a human rights advocate for the last eight years.

It's not that the system is merely unfair.

It's designed to convict the wrong people.

And we have seen many examples of this within the Black community, when corrupt law enforcement officials submitted fake evidence to courts in order to guarantee rapid convictions, which ultimately were overturned.

So, the FBI has been working in this realm, with very clear objectives.

2.  What are those objectives?

Answer:  The FBI wants to be able to accuse any American of any crime at any given moment and have confidence that they can dictate the outcome.  That's totalitarianism, and it has been advancing within the American judicial system for years.

Michael German has written convincingly about the FBI's "criminalization of black identity."

And, of course, the FBI has criminalized all "targets of interest" through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

3.  How can the FBI be getting away with these crimes of false reporting?

Answer: I've discussed this before, but fundamentally, federal law enforcement officers are obligated to tell the truth, but national security officers are not.  The FBI is now defining itself primarily as a national security agency.

4.  Can our national sovereignty survive a lying FBI?

Answer:  No, it cannot.  We can have no illusions about this point.  It's not just that the FBI has lied to and about me.  It has also lied to Congress, to the DOJ, to the U.S. military, to the Executive Branch, to the Supreme Court, and to the American people in deploying fades against our leadership and a substantive part of the American public.

So, no.  We will have no sovereignty as long as the FBI is allowed to lie. The tools the agency is currently wielding are too powerful.  If allowed to persist, the FBI will prevail over all wisdom, reason, judgment and goodwill.

5.  Is there any determination on the part of our leadership to alter the FBI's current course?

Answer:  I cannot imagine that our leadership would not be furious over the FBI's conduct regarding the fade deployments.

How will that pushback weigh in the balance with the FBI's mission and objectives currently?

We will see.

Often throughout history we have seen that psychopathic institutions push their advantage when they have determined that they are needed and cannot be easily replaced.

6.  How will history remember the FBI?

Answer:  How, indeed?  A primary question on the minds of the FBI leadership is whether history can be suppressed through acts of first-degree murder.  Can history be killed, in other words?  The FBI believes it can, but I think their hubris on this point, as on many others, is misplaced.

7.  What about your documentation within the Smithsonian Institution?  Will it be preserved within Smithsonian auspices for Americans in perpetuity?

Answer:  I don't know.  As with so much about this case, I am acting on good faith in the hope that the Smithsonian has, at my directive, been granted an independent endowment, and further, that crucial information about this case will be preserved for the public to assess.

8.  What is the answer to resolving the FBI's crimes against your properties, and related crimes against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  The FBI has claimed secrecy surrounding its crimes against my properties, and I have explained that that means the agency doesn't have license to present false accusations in concealed court proceedings to wrongfully argue for my family members' deaths or my own.

The FBI cannot have it both ways.  It cannot ask me to protect information regarding its malfeasance while still falsely accusing us at every turn.

9.  Who is able to place those boundaries into effect for the FBI?  Who is in charge of the guardrails?

Answer:  Not many people, and I would venture to say they all have suffered sovereignty violations over time. Any person who wields some form of authority over the FBI, and I include myself in this statement, has suffered from fade deployments.

Basically, the FBI has been unwilling to concede to any outer controls or limitations from American leadership.

10.  Now, will the agency be forced to withdraw its false accusations against you and your family members?

Answer:  I would like to see it happen immediately, yes.

11.  Will the agency be forced to withdraw all fade deployments from American leadership and the American people?

Answer:  This would be the best possible outcome of these revelations.  I hope our leaders insist on that withdrawal and I hope they won't relent until it is verifiably accomplished.

12.  Will you please keep us updated with regard to your family's wellbeing and your own?

Answer:  Certainly.  

13.  Will you please let us know whether you are being treated honorably and respectfully in your current residence in Aura Flagstaff, Arizona?

Answer:  Of course.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us tonight.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

FBI Threats of "Eviction" Without Cause

OIG Hotline, please be informed of my communication, below, with Kas of Aura Flagstaff for your reference.

Please note that this issue appears to accompany FBI threats of "eviction" without cause.

It may be that the FBI is attempting to change the terms of the lease to absolve Aura of any liability for harm that might occur to me while being an Aura resident.  The FBI often sets to work on revising legal agreements to release all liability for harm up to and including first degree murder.

Further, perhaps the FBI feels emboldened in knowing that the Arizona Attorney General's Office has elected not to protect me from housing discrimination and attendant harm.

I will provide your Office with all updates regarding this matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Email sent to Kas of Aura Flagstaff at 9:01 PM on April 29, 2026:

Kas, do you recall that, on April 24th, while we were working together on lease materials in your office, I asked you to correct the spelling of my last name from Macwilliams to MacWilliams, with a capital W?

I wanted to be certain that the lease was valid with the correct spelling of my name, so I did not complete the signing of the first version you emailed to me, but rather the second.

Is this your clear understanding?  It certainly is mine.  (Please be aware that because of my human rights advocacy, I need to record my interactions out and about in the wider world; so we do actually have objective documentation to reference should there be any confusion on this point whatsoever.)

I am concerned because now my account within Bilt is misspelled to Macwilliams, whereas it as correctly spelled as MacWilliams previously.

In addition, the second email you sent to me with the link to the lease marked with the correct spelling of my last name, MacWilliams, has apparently been deleted from my gmail account.

(Sometimes these things happen, but the fact that Krystal is now asking me spontaneously to re-sign the lease for Aura with a different spelling of my last name is deeply concerning.  I am not informed as to whether there have been any changes made to the lease documents I signed on the 24th.)

I think the best thing for us to do is to start with our shared recollection of events on the 24th.  Once we have established a mutual recollection of those facts, perhaps you would be so kind as to re-forward the second email you sent to me with the correct spelling of my last name.

From there, we can establish what exactly has gone missing with regard to my original documentation and attempt to locate it appropriately.

Thank you for your support with this matter.  I do realize you are away and that your response may be delayed due to travels.  I hope you're finding your conference productive and enjoyable!

Kind regards,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline,

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails to your Office.  Please note that this list will be updated.

April 29, 2026:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats, April 28, 2026, sent at 12:34 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Note to L, sent at 12:18 AM Pacific time.
April 28, 2026:
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent FBI Threats, April 28, 2026, sent at 10:19 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Unexplained Email Content in Russian, sent at 9:49 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Jurisdiction of the Arizona Attorney General's Office, Civil Rights Division, sent at 4:17 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:58 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Looking Forward, sent at 11:53 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Suspicious Vehicle at Both SpringHill Suites and Aura, sent at 3:27 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Texts GTM, sent at 12:11 AM Pacific time.