1. The President's daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, recently and remarkably stated that President Trump had a speech prepared on an unusual subject, one that he was saving until the right time to deliver to the American people. Do you know what that subject is?
Answer: I do, yes.
2. What is the subject, please?
Answer: The subject pertains to what we commonly refer to as extraterrestrial life.
3. Alien life forms?
Answer: Yes.
4. Does President Trump have knowledge of alien life forms that he has withheld from the American people?
Answer: He does, yes.
5. What is your comment about this subject, please?
Answer: This information has been withheld from the public for decades, actually, and the reason for that choice is simply that no American President has found the time opportune to disclose the details to the American public.
We have, quite understandably, an anthropocentric culture, with anthropocentric religions, and nobody has been willing to delve into this subject matter due to fears about the ability of the public to accept such a profound challenge to our previous views about human life, our role on the Earth, humanity's potential in the future, on and on.
There has been a sense that the information would be destabilizing to human societies.
So, no one has wanted to risk the disclosure.
6. To what point does this information originally date? What American President first received this information?
Answer: Truman, immediately following World War II. And this was the real reason behind his founding and expansion of the intelligence agencies. But every President since Truman has had the information, and the public disclosures have never been made.
Further, at this point, barring disclosure from outside of the government's auspices, they are not going to be made as long as humanity is strong enough to mount a reasonable defense of our specific interests.
7. Why not?
Answer: Because governments are really beholden to a much more advanced species that is threatening us with things like alteration of fundamentals to our ecosystems, such as solar radiation exposures, in addition to global emergencies such as meteor strikes or nuclear war -- any one of which could force the extinction of humanity.
8. Why are these threats being made at this point in time, when we have allegedly had some interaction with alien species since at least as early as the 1940's?
Answer: Because our climate crisis has reached a critical inflection point. We have been told, and the DoD simulations agree with this assessment, that human populations, given our current technologies, must be dramatically reduced.
Others are capitalizing on this inflection point to demand that we make certain territorial concessions, that we agree to one world government with Russia in the lead position, and that we move forward with an acquiescence to totalitarian rule.
9. What would those developments mean for long term human sovereignty?
Answer: They would mean a disaster for long term human sovereignty, and I don't think there's any argument on that point.
10. But you don't believe President Trump will make that speech to the American people, even now?
Answer: No, I don't. Not unless the public forces him into that position through extra-governmental disclosures.
What is much more likely is that certain significant areas of landmass and ocean territories will be designated as unsafe for human habitation and human travel, either through natural disasters, radiation contamination, chemical contamination, or climate change. And those areas will simply not be repopulated by humanity over time.
In reality, those will be territorial concessions that we will not regain.
So, the specific losses will not be accidental.
The United States will redefine its boundaries by pushing into Central and South America, which we're already seeing.
Russia will push westward into Europe.
And China will appropriate Taiwan and Japan, with ambitions toward Australia and New Zealand.
Africa will be conflict-ridden, given a multi-national push for the continent's natural resources.
11. What can Americans expect?
Answer: Americans can expect the power to go out at a certain point. We're not going to have a gradual transition to renewable energy. We will simply experience sudden, recurring and then permanent power outages in much of the nation.
We will have runaway inflation that imposes great hardships on most of the country.
We will see a loss of the fundamentals we have long assumed were givens in our society -- a stable food supply, reliable and safe transportation, a government that is on the side of the citizenry, affordable and accessible electricity, predictable and survivable weather patterns, trustworthy and capable medical care, and beyond.
12. What are the best alternatives for us at this point?
Answer: From my perspective, we need to make the demand that the Earth's environment is not to be irrevocably damaged. That is requirement number one.
That eliminates nuclear war, radiological and chemical contamination, and other kinds of damage that would render large areas of land uninhabitable by human beings.
We shouldn't be worrying about an effective "nuclear winter" that will deprive the Earth of sunlight for a prolonged period, certainly.
Secondly, and related to the above requirement, we need to disclose a few critical truths to the American public, including the genuine nature of our climate crisis and the fact that we are all going to need to change the way we are consuming energy, the way we are conducting our daily lives professionally and personally, our dietary habits, and much more.
The public deserves to know that we can anticipate a whole series of crises that will upend American society as it has existed heretofore.
13. Does the public have the right to information about the pressures being placed on us by Russia and others, as you have mentioned here?
Answer: Yes, that would be the third set of actions. The public deserves to know that the United States government and military are under pressure from a more advanced species.
And we need to openly address the territorial concessions we are being asked to make in that context.
Sovereignty violations against the public should be acknowledged and discussed along with this issue, because they are closely related to our concerns about human freedoms in the future.
14. What are the most important fundamentals with regard to communication from the government?
Answer: Basically, we don't want the government to be lying about the crises we are experiencing nor about the ones we will experience imminently.
If we want to recover human sovereignty to its fullest potential and extent in the future, we need to acknowledge that critical truths have been withheld from the public. And we need to further admit that that concealment, beginning with President Truman, was misguided.
The American public cannot know everything, because some information remains too sensitive.
But we can know that we're in a difficult position which will prompt some unprecedented challenges for our nation.
And we need to navigate those challenges with honesty and integrity at every step of the way.
15. Does that mean that our public and appointed officials should not be profiteering from the suffering of the American people, as you have recently pointed out with regard to your case?
Answer: Yes, it does. It means exactly that.
And it also means that, through informing the American public of our true pressures, we can negotiate more completely with opposing interests with regard to our territorial integrity, now and in the future.
16. What about knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting of the kind currently being perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates?
Answer: It has to go. There is no human sovereignty to be rescued from a nation that has institutionalized knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. Period. The fact that fake dossiers are being aggregated on every single American citizen, including minors, lays out a direct path to a totalitarian dystopia from which there is no retreat.
The FBI does not need these fake dossiers. It merely wants them.
We cannot grant the agency's wish in this regard.
Human sovereignty is much more valuable than the unconstitutional programs that have created this national mess.
Our freedoms of thought, speech, assembly, press, privacy, private property -- these are much more necessary to us than the false reporting of the FBI.
17. Will this document be aggregated within a trove of your documentation to be made publicly available to all Americans in the future?
Answer: Yes, it will. Barring my determination that it should be excluded, it will be accessible to all.
18. What message does that send to those who authorized sniper reconnaissance outside of your apartment this morning?
Answer: It's not so easy to kill the truth. Wise men and women don't attempt to do so.
President Trump's legacy will not be enhanced by the FBI's murder of me as a leading advocate for our nation's sovereignty.
Nor will it be helped by the DEW deployments perpetrated overnight, intended to cause brain damage and/or organ failure.
It won't be salvaged by a staged car accident, kidnapping, or manifestation of the FBI's threats of deafness, blindness or other health problems either.
The time has come for real leadership from highly capable people, and that requires dialogue.
19. What if the government is relying on your case in order to manifest certain economic priorities?
Answer: To be clear, profiteering cannot be considered an "economic priority."
The government needs to reach out to me in an honorable way for a discussion incorporating integrity and respect -- not victimization and contempt.
20. Well said. Given your insistence on the preservation of the Earth's environmental integrity, and your ongoing advocacy for the sovereignty of Americans, let's hope that outreach occurs imminently.
Answer: That's a worthy hope, certainly.
21. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
