In Appreciation for All Who Are Defending American Sovereignty in Their Decision-making

 1.  Is Attorney General Pam Bondi supporting the Supreme Court's ruling that investigative reports must be provided to you regarding your case?

Answer:  I believe she is, yes, despite what must be extraordinary pressure.

2.  What is your perspective regarding her choice to do so?

Answer:  Tremendous gratitude, and I hope the whole country can ultimately comprehend how important this decision is.  We need to grasp that the Attorney General, in defending the Supreme Court on this issue, is choosing to defend the long term human rights of Americans and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole.

So the Supreme Court has taken this stance, the OIG Hotline has taken this stance, certain members of Congress have taken this stance, and I myself have taken this stance.

And these decisions are being made by women and men working together -- largely behind the scenes -- to uphold the most foundational human rights and human dignity and individual self-determination and national sovereignty that make the American endeavor exceptional, transformative, and worthy.

3.  Are there those who have taken a contrary view?  Are there those who have pushed the Attorney General to ignore the Supreme Court ruling regarding this case?

Answer:  By definition, the FBI as a whole, as well as its affiliate agencies, will be opposing the Supreme Court rulings regarding this matter, which is of such profound import to the future.

Further, I think it's fair to say that those who may feel implicated by the reports in some manner will be opposing its provision to me.

But I have tried to make clear that the reports should be wielded for the defense of the future of our nation and our people, and not for the purpose of casting blame.

Sometimes, paradoxically, horrific experiences in the short term can be transformed into a much greater long term support of human rights across the board.

So, I hope people can hear my commitment to work for that outcome.

And again, in answer to your question, we all need to be deeply appreciative of the Attorney General's commitment to that path.

4.  What do you have to say about the fact that you and your family members are experiencing an escalation in threats of violence at this time?

Answer:  You know, the FBI and its affiliates are frightened, clearly.

But I think the U.S. military is interested in the long term sovereignty of the nation, and I think our military leadership is watching this situation closely.

The military leadership does not want to see certain information rendered public at this juncture, but they do want to see greater leverage regarding the leadership role of the United States regarding issues of long term global concern.

The military and I both know that I need to handle myself quite well in order to continue to play a forward role in my advocacy for the national interest.

So, I 'm going to be looking for their support, as well as the input of others.

5.  Are there certain issues of American sovereignty on which left, right and center agree?

Answer:  There are, without question.  Yes.  And these are the issues that we all consider necessary for our experience that we as Americans are a free people.

This is what is currently on the line for us, and this is the reason that everyone's support for the conveyance of reports to me at this time is critically important.

We need to recognize those who are making decisions supporting the long term national interest regarding this matter, such as the Attorney General's Office, and we need to stand together in expressing our appreciation for that leadership.

6.  Are you asking that President Trump extend his support regarding the safety of your loved ones and yourself at this time, while you await the provision of the reports from the OIG Hotline?

Answer:  Yes, I am, certainly.  I will appreciate the President's commitment to our security over these coming days, weeks, and months, and together with that, I will appreciate the efforts of the Congress and the U.S. DOJ to safeguard us as well.

7.  Are you prepared for confidential talks regarding your case?

Answer:  I am.  These discussions are the starting point for our shared understanding of the most critical changes that need to be implemented in upholding our long term sovereignty.

8.  Can the sovereignty of the United States be reclaimed in the long term?

Answer:  It must be.  The sovereignty of our nation will determine the human rights and self-determination of our own country and all those we influence the world over.  We are the key to the fulfillment of humanity's greatest long term potential.  So we need to work together to prevail.

9.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Americans Who Breathe Life Into the Constitution

 1.  The FBI appears to be indicating to you that you need to leave your home.  Do you have any idea why that is?

Answer:  The agency seems to be alleging that there are bxxx threats against my home, against my vehicles, and against mail and packages arriving for me as well.  So, they seem to be advising that I leave the premises.

2.  What is the reason for the escalation in bxxx threats?  Do you have any idea?

Answer:  It seems that there is a Constitutional requirement for the U.S. DOJ to provide investigative reports to Representative Sam Liccardo at this point, and further, that there is a legal requirement that he in turn convey those same reports to me.

3.  What are your thoughts about this?

Answer:  My thoughts are those of gratitude for the OIG Hotline, whose investigators have not given up on this arduous endeavor.  And my thoughts are those of deep appreciation for the Supreme Court, which has ruled that the reports must be provided to me.  

These honorable people deserve immense respect and thanks from the whole of the country for holding up under pressure that is unimaginable to most of us.

4.  Not unimaginable to you?

Answer:  Not unimaginable to me.  No.  

5.  What about Representative Sam Liccardo?

Answer:  I voted for him, but I've never met him.  If he has the courage to convey the reports to me intact, then he's a remarkable person.

6.  If investigative reports are conveyed to you, will this open up discussion regarding your case as a whole?

Answer:  Even if my case is ongoing, yes, it will necessarily open up discussion regarding events to date.

7.  You have said that you are sensitive to the fact that not everything within your case can be rendered public at this time.

Answer:  That's true, clearly.  And there may be subjects that are considered extremely sensitive in a lasting context as well.  Having said that, discussion about the preservation of the long term human rights of Americans in light of what we know so far is profoundly and transformatively important.

8.  How is your family holding up under this extraordinary pressure?

Answer:  I have been speaking a great deal about the importance of human sovereignty, and this is partly because I am extremely aware of sovereignty violations toward certain of my family members and the tremendous loss in personal freedom this has exacted.  There is no question that the strains are tremendous, and I can only hope they can survive them until the full reports are placed into my hands.

9.  Their lives are being threatened under these conditions?

Answer:  Daily.  Yes.

10.  What are you communicating to them in order to try to help them?

Answer:  I'm trying to reaffirm that they are important, that their experience is important, that their lives are important, that their hope in humanity cannot be extinguished at this moment or any other.

11.  What is your impression of their response to your words?

Answer:  That they are heavily burdened by their agencies at this time -- truly struggling to maintain their health and safety, facing demands for their signatures on false statements about our family on a daily basis, that they are frightened, beleaguered, traumatized and heartbroken for our country. All of this and more.

12. Are the very agencies that are demanding false statements from them -- namely the FBI and its affiliates -- using those false testaments to wrongfully justify plans of violence against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  Yes, the false statements are always taken to an individual judge somewhere as wrongful justification for physical harm.  

13.  The Supreme Court has consistently ruled in your favor in this case, hasn't it?

Answer:  I have not seen the judgements, but I believe this to be true.  The FBI should not be able to take renewed false claims to judges from lower courts in order to cause us harm, yet this appears to have happened on several occasions.

14.  Is it unconstitutional for the FBI to take your case to lower courts for rulings intended to cause your family harm, when the Supreme Court has already decided in your favor?

Answer:  I suspect this violates judicial procedure on multiple counts, yes.

15.  What has allowed these violations to continue?

Answer:  Secrecy.  It is the fact that the FBI is taking knowingly false evidence to lower courts in secret that has caused tremendous damage to my family members and myself.  And these improper proceedings have allowed for the continued demands for false statements from my children and daughter-in-law, despite clear and repeated violations of their human rights.

16.  What can halt this destructive cycle?

Answer:  Only the provision to me of the investigative reports, together with full disclosure to me regarding all aspects of my case.

17.  Can that now happen with certainty in the Constitutional mandates that require it?

Answer:  Yes, it can happen.  It is important for us to recognize that our Constitutional mandates depend, in the long term, on our own insistence.  The OIG Hotline is insisting, the Supreme Court is insisting, certain elected leaders are insisting, and I myself am insisting that this case matters to the long term freedoms we all consider foundational to a meaningful, joyful, honorable, trustful and worthy life as Americans.  The Constitution is a living document, and all of these good people are breathing life into it.

So, we need to understand how important our insistence is to others when we think about the sovereignty of those who will come after us.

We want them to say we served them well.

18.  Do you wish this particular responsibility had fallen on someone else's shoulders?

Answer:  There's a wonderful scene in the Lord of the Rings in which Frodo says, "I wish the Ring had never come to me.  I wish none of this had happened."

Gandalf answers him, "So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide.  All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us."

19.  What does that dialogue mean to you?

Answer:  It means that we need to strive to our utmost even and especially when we're outnumbered and discouraged.

20.  Have you met the new Sheriff of San Mateo County, Ken Binder?

Answer:  No, I have not.

21.  Is Sheriff Binder being asked to assist in surveillance of your property and potential harm to your family members?

Answer:  The FBI always coordinates with local law enforcement regarding false accusations for which they have sought the death penalty through concealed proceedings.

22.  Does Sheriff Binder have a role to play in objecting to the FBI's conduct in this case?

Answer:  Objections to improper proceedings based on false evidence are always a positive sign.  

23.  Should your sons' and daughter-in-law's coerced false witness statements be withdrawn, as well as that of your Uncle, and other friends and relatives who have been threatened and harmed because of this case?

Answer:  Decisively and immediately, yes.

24.  What are the most substantive threats you are receiving other than those delineated a few minutes ago?

Answer:  Staged "natural" disasters including landslides, sinkholes, wildfire, house fire, flooding, meteor fall, and other catastrophic failures such as gas explosion or fatal car accident --  along with issues such as power outage combined with violent home invasion, kidnapping or sniper assault.

25.  One of your family members has said he doesn't believe reports will ever be provided to you.  Yet you disagree.

Answer:  I cannot give up hope for the American people regarding their human rights, their dignity, and their personal sovereignty.   It's just not possible for me.

26.  Why not?

Answer:  Without working on behalf of the American people and our national sovereignty as a whole, I would have perished long ago.  It is my hope for others that has allowed me to endure.

27.  Will you please keep in close communication with us regarding your wellbeing and that of your family?

Answer:  Of course.  Yes.

28.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline, March 2, 2026

OIG Hotline, please see my communications to your Office from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com today, March 2, 2026.  Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day.

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Request for Investigative Report from the U.S. DOJ's OIG Hotline, sent at 11:35 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Follow Up Re: Request for Investigative Report from the U.S. DOJ's OIG Hotline, sent at 12:20 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ReSupply Support: Requesting Tax Receipt, sent at 1:03 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 1:13 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 2, 2026, sent at 1:54 PM and 8:06 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Americans Who Breathe Life Into the Constitution, sent at 6:59 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Amazon Delivery, March 2, 2026, sent at 7:17 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Unrecognized Calls, March 2, 2026, sent at 7:50 PM Pacific time.

To Representative Sam Liccardo: Request for Investigative Report from the U.S. DOJ's OIG Hotline

Email to the OIG Hotline from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 11:35 AM Pacific time on March 2, 2026.

OIG Hotline, please be informed of my communication, below, with Representative Sam Liccardo, who has expressed his intention to spend time within the U.S. DOJ this week, specifically requesting his constituents' guidance on the material they would like to receive.

I very much appreciate your support in conveying certified, sealed investigative reports regarding my case to Representative Liccardo at the earliest opportunity.

Thank you for your support regarding this matter.

Most sincerely, 

Lane MacWilliams

*************************************************************************************

Email sent to: sam.liccardo@mail.house.gov

From: lanemacwilliams@gmail.com

Date/Time Stamps:  March 2, 2026 at 11:31 AM Pacific time.

To the Staff of Representative Sam Liccardo:

Since Representative Liccardo was kind enough to ask his constituents for guidance with regard to his search for specific documentation within the U.S. DOJ, I hereby request that he inquire with the U.S. DOJ's Office of the Inspector General Hotline a full copy of investigative reports regarding my case as adjudicated with the assistance of that Office before the Supreme Court.

My understanding is that the Supreme Court has ruled that I must be provided with these full disclosures, yet the U.S. DOJ has so far been unable to successfully convey that material into my possession.

Reports provided should be certified material, secured with an official seal, and should not leave the direct possession of anyone who is authorized to transport material to me.

Under no circumstances should material be emailed to me, due to risks of the broad dissemination of false information.

Thank you for conveying this request to Representative Liccardo.  While I am unable to communicate with Representative Liccardo directly via email, I appreciate your serving as intermediary with regard to updates and progress concerning this matter.

Please be informed that in the past, a third party has endeavored to disrupt communication with my elected representatives through online impersonation in the communication of threats.  Please understand that I have not and will not ever extend threats to anyone, and that I believe our elected representatives should be treated with the utmost respect and appreciation for their honorable service to their constituents and the nation as a whole.

Sincerely yours,

Lane MacWilliams

******************************************************************************************************

Email sent to the OIG Hotline from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com on March 2, 2026 at 12:20 PM Pacific time.

OIG Hotline, please see my follow up communication, below, to Representative Sam Liccardo's staff.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this important documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

********************************************************************************************************

Email sent to sam.liccardo@mail.house.gov

From lanemacwilliams@gmail.com

Date/time stamps: March 2, 2026 at 12:16 PM Pacific time.

To the Staff of Representative Sam Liccardo:

Pursuant to my request for Representative Liccardo's secure conveyance of investigative reports to me from the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, please be informed that travel and expenses related to the conveyance of certified, sealed reports may be reimbursed by the OIG Hotline up to $20,000.

However, that reimbursement cannot be characterized as a political donation in any context, as it could improperly disallow my receipt of awards that have been extended to me over the years of my diligent advocacy on behalf of the long term human rights of all Americans.

If you have any questions about this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me via email prior to any reimbursement request.

Respectfully,

Lane MacWilliams

For the Formal Record

 OIG Hotline, for the formal record, let it be known that I did not cancel a meeting scheduled for February 28, 2026.  I set legal parameters for that meeting, after which other participants cancelled.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline, March 1, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see my emails to your Office from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com on March 1, 2026.  Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Follow Up to Gardening Services at 45 Vista Verde Way, Portola Valley, sent at 12:24 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd:  Text Message to Joao Bxxxxx, sent at 12:30 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd:  Follow Up to Gardening and Initial Repairs, 45 Vista Verde Way, sent at 12:55 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update and Documentation of Lane MacWilliams' Wifi Access, March 1, 2026, sent at 1:07 AM and 2:50 PM Pacific time. (Update at 3:06 AM Pacific time on March 2, 2026)
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Follow Up to Gardening and Initial Repairs, 45 Vista Verde Way, sent at 2:05 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: No Donations to ... from 10/4/25 to the Present Time, sent at 2:23 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Your Walk-through, Followed By Your Stroll With Zoe, March 1, 2026, sent at 2:26 PM Pacific time.
• Fwd: Our Emails, sent at 2:28 PM Pacific time.
• Fwd: The Republican Shutdown, sent at 2:28 PM Pacific time.
• Fwd: Will You Join Our Focus Group, sent at 2:29 PM Pacific time.
• Fwd:  Our Emails, sent at 2:29 PM Pacific time.
• Fwd: Will You Join Our Focus Group, sent at 2:30 PM Pacific time.
• Fwd: Our Emails, sent at 2:30 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: For the Formal Record Re: No Meeting on 2/28/2026, sent at 2:54 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Dog Grooming, March 1, 2026, sent at 5:19 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 8:09 PM Pacific time.

Communication to Portola Valley Contractor