1. What are some of the most heinous things President Trump has done regarding your case?
Answer: Recently? He authorized the placement of an electro-magnetic sink at a rental property I was considering, planning for my murder through its deployment.
2. What is an electro-magnetic sink and why is it dangerous?
Answer: There are conditions under which, when combined with other DEWs, it can cause a fatal electric shock very reliably.
3. So, it's an electrocution.
Answer: It is, yes. An electrocution that the victim has no advance warning about, under ordinary circumstances.
4. Was the FBI fined heavily for its participation in this scheme?
Answer: Very.
5. Did the agency learn its lesson?
Answer: Apparently not, because the agency, as of last night, set up the same equipment at my hotel, the TownePlace Suites by Marriott in Tehachapi, California.
6. They set up another electro-magnetic sink in order to cause fatal electric shock to you in your room?
Answer: Yes, they did.
7. Will you ask for injunctive relief pertaining to this follow on crime by the FBI?
Answer: Yes, I will.
8. So, the agency learned nothing from the first incident.
Answer: Apparently not. They wanted to repeat themselves and see whether they could get away with it the second time around.
9. How could the OIG Hotline ascertain the truth of this matter?
Answer: My understanding is that the military personnel supervising the equipment set up are the same. It's a little bit of a sophisticated technical problem, and not everyone can ensure that the electric currents are sufficient for the fatal shock to occur.
There is Dodge Ram pickup truck 42784L4 which the OIG Hotline should track. There are overlaps with the last attempt. So, I think the circumstances will become clear.
10. Are you filing a complaint regarding this issue?
Answer: Yes, with this dialogue. And I am herewith immediately claiming any and all penalties for the Foundation I have specified to protect American sovereignty.
11. May we turn to your car for a moment?
Answer: Please go ahead.
12. You have been informed that an autonomous sniper device has been placed in your car, intended to fire when you are stopped at a traffic light. Is this so?
Answer: Yes, apparently, the FBI has placed it inside the upholstery of the driver's seat. So, it's directly behind me the whole time I am driving.
13. You spoke about this for the first time yesterday, and today, your car has suddenly been recalled.
Answer: That's true.
14. What are the chances that that recall was entirely coincidental regarding the illumination of this matter?
Answer: Zero, in my opinion.
15. Did FlexCar, which is your car subscription service, knowingly place your life at risk by providing you with a car that had an autonomous sniper device placed inside it before you picked it up?
Answer: This appears to be the implication, yes.
16. Has FlexCar diminished in your eyes because of their failure to protect you in this important incident?
Answer: That would be a fair observation. Who would want to rent a car through a subscription service like FlexCar knowing that, even on one occasion, they accepted pay from the FBI to perpetrate murder against an honorable American human rights advocate within the United States? That would dent their business model, certainly.
All business is conducted on a basis of trust, and FlexCar seems to have proven that it has no respect for its customers, unfortunately.
Now, they want the car back before the device can be recovered by others.
17. Turning to another subject for a moment, the FBI has threatened to contaminate your food with psilocybin at every opportunity. What is the agency thinking regarding this matter?
Answer: They have allegedly harmed both of my sons with this methodology through their PsyOps division. They basically try to cause psychotic breaks among their sane critics, after which they call them mentally ill and justify yet further physical injury.
18. So, it's a plan of murder, essentially, with a quick stop along the way for a false diagnosis of mental illness.
Answer: Yes, that's accurate.
19. In this case, are they trying to diagnose you as mentally ill so that they can misappropriate funds under the auspices of the Foundation?
Answer: Yes, that's exactly what they are attempting.
20. Have they already stolen funds on that basis?
Answer: I'm under the impression that they were blocked on this occasion, even though they were reportedly wielding an AI-generated film bearing my likeness in which I was supposedly crawling and weeping through a laundromat.
21. Did that strike you as odd?
Answer: The allegation certainly bore no resemblance to my experience. So, yes, it seemed remarkably odd.
22. What is President Trump's culpability regarding all of these plans?
Answer: The buck stops with the President. So his responsibility is 100 percent. He has authorized the plans, and he is culpable of their implementation.
23. President Trump is allegedly worried about impeachment at this point.
Answer: So I understand.
24. May I know your thoughts about this possibility?
Answer: He has allegedly stolen at least three trillion dollars from this case in order to privatize those funds as his own family's personal assets. And now he is threatening to fire the lead investigator within the OIG Hotline so he or she cannot hold him to account regarding this matter. If either one of these allegations is true, then I understand why he may fear impeachment.
25. You have recently stated that you believe there needs to be campaign finance reform that would free our elected representatives from the control of those who are managing election finances at the state and federal levels.
Answer: Yes, I think those running for political office at the state and federal level can be rendered free of the burden of fundraising in order to focus on their constituents and their broader policy initiatives. And I think the nation would be much better off if we are able to implement this change across the board.
26. Returning to the OIG Hotline for a moment, how important is it that the staff members be free from the threat of job loss?
Answer: It is critical to the whole nation, frankly. These people are central to our ability to preserve United States sovereignty. And this is not an overstatement.
27. You insist that the OIG Hotline have job security, as well as personal health and safety on a daily basis.
Answer: I do.
28. Has the President also targeted the OIG Hotline through PsyOps and other predatory initiatives?
Answer: There is an allegation that ten people are currently being targeted, including at least two within the OIG Hotline. So, this is completely unacceptable.
29. Are the allegations true that the ten include three Supreme Court Justices who have ruled consistently in your favor regarding your case?
Answer: I cannot conjecture about that allegation, but I find the mere suggestion to be extremely disturbing.
30. Is the FBI attempting to control the rulings of the Supreme Court through unconstitutional intimidation and threats toward Supreme Court Justices?
Answer: I think Congress needs to ask them this question, and right away. Supreme Court decisions being made now will affect our nation's sovereignty for many generations. So we owe a debt of gratitude to those who are courageously holding the line on behalf of the freedom of the American people. That includes Supreme Court Justices, and it certainly also includes the OIG Hotline.
31. Can the safety of these ten critical people be restored?
Answer: That's what we're about to find out. I can only say that I am insisting on it, and I won't stop insisting until the FBI learns that it must relent.
32. Are your family members being affected by this targeting?
Answer: Yes, and I would expect that the family members of all ten people are being targeted as well.
33. In a word, how would you characterize that conduct by the FBI and those authorizing the FBI, including the President?
Answer: Unconscionable.
34. Given the extraordinary threats to your life from the FBI, including the firing of two bullets in your proximity the day before yesterday, will you please keep in close contact with us?
Answer: Yes, certainly.
35. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon, and please travel carefully through the wider world.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams, aka Carol Elaine Von Herzen
