1. Let's turn to the subject of the crimes Tom Lyons directed toward your property on Cape Cod, please.
Answer: Please go ahead.
2. What information did the FBI provide to you regarding this issue?
Answer: The FBI appeared to send me a lot of material about a "house of horrors," a house in which the deceased were concealed or buried, a house in which capital crimes had taken place, in addition to a lot of suggestions of "framing," corrupt law enforcement, falsified law enforcement reporting, manipulation of DNA evidence, and concealed court proceedings.
3. Over how long a period of time were you receiving these apparent allegations?
Answer: For years, it seemed to me. I found all of these allegations to be deeply upsetting, and I reported them regularly to the OIG Hotline for documentation purposes.
4. One winter several years ago, you traveled to your family home on Cape Cod in order to check on the property. Is that correct?
Answer: I have a fiduciary duty to manage the property, despite the extraordinary obstacles created by the FBI. So I traveled to Cape Cod in January of 2025 to assess the observable condition of the house and land.
5. What did you find?
Answer: It was quite cold, because the heat was turned off for the winter at that time, but I was alarmed upon entering the house.
6. May I ask why?
Answer: I remember that I reported to the OIG Hotline that the house smelled like a morgue. And I have never been in a morgue. But, on crossing the threshold, there was an immediate revulsion and nausea. This is an instinctive response -- not a learned one. I felt that there was something very, very wrong, and I immediately reached out the OIG Hotline about my impressions, requesting an investigation.
7. Did you also request information from the local police department and the local District Attorney?
Answer: Several times, yes.
8. And were you provided with any material regarding your home or your family?
Answer: No, I received nothing. At one point, I brought a dozen donuts to the Falmouth Police Department, together with my written request for information, and several officers appeared to be hiding in a darkened office behind the reception area. It seemed like exceptionally strange behavior from my point of view.
But I was denied all access to any information regarding my property, my family members or myself.
9. Did you make yourself available for a dialogue with law enforcement?
Answer: Absolutely, yes. I would have loved to have spoken with them directly about my concerns.
Later that winter, I traveled to Washington, D.C. to make myself available to the DOJ for direct meetings regarding my case, including my concerns about my home on Cape Cod. In addition, I wanted to ensure that a conveyance of case material could be rendered unobstructed by my presence within Washington, D.C.
10. What happened?
Answer: Nothing. I received no response.
I did have my life directly threatened by two men on the seventh floor of the Hilton on Connecticut Avenue.
And I was drugged by contaminated food that was served to me at the Hamilton restaurant in D.C.
So, I came away with the impression that Washington, D.C. was an exceptionally dangerous place for good people.
The town seemed to be crawling with corrupt intelligence personnel.
And I received no honest engagement whatsoever.
11. What were your impressions based on your outreach to all offices involved?
Answer: I don't want to leave out that I also asked for direct communication from the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, and was met with silence there, as well.
What were my impressions? My impressions were and are that falsified law enforcement reporting is a big, big racket within the United States at this time. I feel that all of these officials knew perfectly well that there had been FBI malfeasance at my property, perhaps both of my properties, and they were dodging any direct dialogue with me that would render them accountable to disclose these crimes on the part of the FBI and its affiliates.
Meanwhile, my life was under threat the entire time.
Honestly, I look back at my communications to all of these offices, at my travel that was intended to make decisive progress regarding my case, at my striving on every front -- and I think "That woman has astonishing courage!"
Truly, the record of my efforts is rather superhuman.
12. Given your superhuman efforts, what do you think of the allegation that the issue of the crimes Tom Lyons directed against your properties is only now being adjudicated for the first time?
Answer: Well, it shows you how dangerous the situation has become for the honorable public. Have I been asked to give testimony regarding any of these events? No. Not one gesture of outreach.
Meanwhile, I am supposedly on trial for my life for crimes for which Tom Lyons, Brandan Pesa and their FBI cohort are entirely responsible.
13. Do Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa have immunity from criminal prosecution regarding the crimes they directed?
Answer: I think it's clear that they exceeded the boundaries of that legal immunity.
Do they have a degree of immunity from prosecution? Yes.
But these abuses are so extraordinary that I think it's possible that immunity could be invalidated.
14. Why are you so determined to speak publicly about this matter at this time?
Answer: Because these men are still allegedly lying about my honor and lawfulness in a court setting in which I have no opportunity for rebuttal.
To write about the conduct of these men, by name, on a daily basis, is the only way in which I can defend my virtue and my integrity.
15. Will you continue to do so until your requirements for resolution of this matter are met to your standards and satisfaction?
Answer: Yes, I will.
16. What about the argument that these men would prefer not to be publicly exposed?
Answer: And I would prefer not to be falsely accused of crimes of which I have no knowledge whatsoever.
Mine is the greater need.
17. How do you respond to allegations that Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa, after having wrongfully conscripted your younger son into the Pxxxxxx Program, criminally directed him to perpetrate acts which were intended from the very beginning to frame you of serious crimes?
Answer: I know my sons, both of them, exceptionally well. I raised them myself with infinite honor, respect, love, faith, wisdom, engagement, and kindness. And I know they both would have died before harming another person prior to being tortured by the FBI and its affiliates.
The FBI assailed both of them with repeated sovereignty violations in the form of fade deployments in addition to torture, and the annihilation of personal boundaries that can result from such aggression needs to be fully understood if human sovereignty is to endure in any meaningful form whatsoever.
Do I believe that Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa directed a long series of criminal acts in a long term plan to destroy my entire family? Absolutely. That much is patently clear. And we also need to understand that they intended to profiteer from that criminal sequence.
18. What should happen to Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa at this juncture?
Answer: A lot of the problems we face in failed societies is the result of a lack of accountability. So the first requirement is for Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa to acknowledge their crimes to a court of law.
While I have been deprived of direct legal representation in every setting, these men have armies of lawyers at their disposal.
They should avail themselves of this advocacy and they should admit their crimes against my family.
At least that would give us a starting point for dialogue through an intermediary, which obviously needs to occur.
19. What should happen to the funds these men have misappropriated from your account over time?
Answer: All of it should be re-appropriated from these men's assets and returned to my account and then some. These men should literally be in debt to me for the rest of their lives, which I hope are long, so they can think about what they've done.
There are laws which disallow profiteering by predators. They need to be enforced in this case.
20. What about the additional civil liability these men have incurred to you? And what about the additional civil liability of the FBI and its affiliate agencies, which assisted these men in their criminal acts?
Answer: This needs to be carefully assessed, certainly, and I need to be directly involved in those discussions, because there are many components of that liability which are not delineated here.
But it is fair to say that the prolonged malice and predation involved in these events is extraordinarily severe, cruel, and malevolent. And I think that the civil liabilities incurred with regard to the FBI's crimes against my properties, and the crimes against my family pertaining to this particular scheme, should dwarf many other aspects of this case in terms of liability.
21. Once a liability is awarded to you, should the FBI and its affiliates be able to come along later and misappropriate those funds?
Answer: Never. It should never happen. The FBI and its affiliates are opposed to human sovereignty and the sovereignty of the United States as a whole. No one should be able to come along after the fact and demand payment from awards of which I have not been formally informed.
I cannot take my dogs for a walk without the FBI's wrongfully claiming that they harmed someone or threatened someone.
So, this graft needs to stop and the DOJ needs to insist that it stop.
Awards extended to me should not be available for anybody to co-opt later on.
Awards should be formally conveyed to me and then I should be allowed to designate funds for critical support of the sovereignty of the United States and our people. No one should be standing in the way of that.
22. The funds these men have misappropriated have rendered them substantially more powerful than they were at the outset of this case, haven't they?
Answer: Unquestionably so, and that's why these men's crimes now need to ensure their impoverishment. If Americans' future sovereignty is going to have a chance, then opponents of the independence of the United States must not become wealthy nation-states unto themselves.
23. It is reported that Tom Lyons has tried to weasel his way out of accountability for his crimes in this matter by wrongfully alleging that your parents were violent criminals. How do you feel about that attempt?
Answer: As George Orwell said, "Who controls the past controls the future." When we abandon the truth of our honorable and virtuous parents, we abandon all hope for a worthy future as well.
History cannot be a creative writing exercise for criminals evading accountability.
We are required to face the past honorably and truthfully if we hope that our worthy national character will be preserved through time.
Tom Lyons needs to be sharply rebuked for all of these attempts, and so does the FBI as a whole.
24. Will the Smithsonian Institution one day provide all of your writings for the American public to assess independent of governmental restrictions and censorship?
Answer: In the absence of my actively and directly curating that material, I certainly hope so.
25. Will you continue to speak about these issues for the time being?
Answer: I will continue to speak about these concerns until and unless I receive satisfactory resolution of this case to date to my standards and satisfaction, yes.
26. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
