A Territorial Challenge for the United States: The Race Toward Coastal Mining

 1.  Can you weigh in on the problems the United States is experiencing with regard to offshore mining?

Answer:  There is a push to aggregate rare earths at the current time, and there is a feeling that, if they are not mined aggressively, they may fall into the wrong hands.

2.  Can you be more specific with regard to the threats we are facing?

Answer:  There has already been a fair degree of deep-sea mining of which the United States is aware.

There is a feeling that, if our coasts are not adequately defended in the future, other interests could aggregate our rare earth metals, rendering them unavailable for our own use.

3.  So, either way, you are saying that the coasts will likely suffer extensive environmental damage.

Answer:  This is the greatest likelihood with our current approach, unfortunately.  

The best alternative would involve preserving our oceans as national parks or, in deeper waters, international parks.  Environmentally, this would serve as a safeguard against destructive mining operations and allow us to place certain protections of the ocean within the ocean landscape.

4.  What could those protections consist of?

Answer:  Sonic safeguarding would represent an effective approach, but this would need to be implemented early, and with cooperative planning.

If we get into a contest to see who can despoil the earth of its resources the fastest, then we've entered into a losing paradigm.  No one wins when the environment is ruined through rapacious mining.

5.  You sound as if you feel the United States may suffer significant territorial losses at the coasts.

Answer:  I think that's accurate, yes.  There are those who believe that we may experience various environmental crises that would force evacuation of coastal areas, and, following that, that we may not be free to re-occupy those regions.

6.  So, these areas may be viewed as uninhabitable?

Answer:  Yes.  

7.  But in truth, there would be coastal mining and other fairly radical environmental changes to the landscape?

Answer:  Yes, that's correct.  And coastal mining that was not being conducted by the United States.

8.  What are the ramifications for the health of the oceans?

Answer:  I think they're highly significant. I think we could expect to see a substantive decline in coastal marine habitat, perhaps to irreversible degree.

9.  You have said previously that there is an FBI allegation of evacuating Northern California on the basis of some manmade or "natural" disaster.

Answer: Yes, the agency appears to have extended repeated threats about this issue.

10.  Is the FBI planning to claim a terrorist event connected to the war in Iran?

Answer:  Apparently, this is front and center for the FBI, yes.

11.  Is the Trump administration actively involved in this potential scenario?

Answer:  You are asking an important question, and I hope that history asks it rigorously as well.

12.  What is the responsibility of this administration to address the climate crisis with the public honestly?

Answer:  There has been no indication that the severity of our climate crisis is going to be openly addressed at this time.  What is the responsibility to do so?  Well, I think it's a moral imperative.  

It's extremely difficult for societies to re-align with the truth once the government starts to lie about the most major factors driving certain decision-making.  It's not impossible, but there are many entrenched interests that support ongoing disinformation.

The public is not seen as capable of comprehending the truth, and the government ceases trying to extend it.

13.  Will there come a time when the truth can be spoken about the most critical pressures we currently face?

Answer:  That depends entirely on the character of our leaders, frankly.

Real leadership is not about hosting a cocktail party on the deck of the Titanic.

It's about preventing the disaster by captaining that ship with competence, foresight, communication, integrity, strategic capacity, preparation and adaptability.

14.  What is happening to those who are trying to point out our greatest challenges?

Answer:  They're certainly being identified by the FBI as "radicals" and "journalists."  Behind the scenes, the FBI considers them "glitches in the matrix."  In other words, the FBI is trying to silence these people, and as rapidly as possible.

15.  What is the FBI's current position, given that it has been found to have committed high treason by deploying fades against the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, the Executive Branch, and others?

Answer:  Significantly diminished.  I don't know that anyone in our government will ever really extend trust to the FBI and its affiliates again.  The breaches of United States sovereignty are too comprehensive and profound.

16.  The FBI appears to allege that the agency has returned to its former narrative of trying to discredit you with false accusations of mental illness.  Do you have any comment?

Answer:  The FBI is becoming much more rapid in the agency's utilization of AI-generated audio and video to falsely depict honorable American citizens.  So, the agency can create any dialogue it wants, any video it can imagine, in an effort to thoroughly discredit an agency critic.

I happen to be remarkably resilient and stable psychologically. much to the FBI's obvious consternation.

But lies and defamation are dangerous activities by the FBI, and make no mistake, they are intended to be.

17.  Do you have any history of mental illness?

Answer:  Never.

18.  Do you suffer from delusions or auditory hallucinations?

Answer:  Decidedly not.

19.  Are you depressed or anxious?

Answer:  Not at all.

20.  How do you manage your equanimity in the face of ongoing crimes by the FBI?

Answer:  I try to keep my focus on what I can do for others.  This is a great anodyne to the FBI's selfishness and narcissistic deceit.  In fact, on the basis of this conversation, I would like to think more about whether extending our national parks to include our coastal waters would be possible.

21.  Will you please keep in close contact with us, given the FBI's apparent ongoing predation toward your family members and yourself?

Answer:  I'm happy to do so.

22.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

An Open Letter to Tom Lyons

Dear Mr. Lyons:

Because you openly provided me with your business card (a card I still possess) at a meeting in Hillsborough several years ago, and because you actively invited my communications at that time, I feel that I am well within my rights to write an open letter to you regarding your misconduct against my family.

My understanding is that you are still employed by the FBI as of this writing.

Mr. Lyons, allegedly, the FBI routinely skims several percentage points off real estate transactions they prompt among their "targets of interest," whom the agency attempts, in all regards, to impoverish and dispossess of their property.

If the FBI cannot force a property sale, the agency apparently threatens, as it threatened to me, to drive the value of the property to zero through punitive crimes committed by the FBI itself.

This brings me to the astonishing allegation on the part of your own agency that you committed or directed a series of capital crimes with the intent of placing related "evidence" on one or more of my properties.

Mr. Lyons, I am certain the revelations of your purported misconduct in this matter are embarrassing to you and to the FBI, both.

But it is time for you to face the truth of any and all criminal acts you perpetrated or directed with an intent to wrongfully blame my family members or myself.

Actions have consequences, Mr. Lyons, and, as much as your immunity from prosecution has granted you license to perpetrate astonishing and gratuitous harm against my family, the truth has a way of emerging when honorable people insist.

And, Mr. Lyons, I insist.

Your forced recruitment of both of my sons and daughter-in-law into concealed government programs with which they wanted no involvement, for the express purpose of coercion of their conduct at your directive, including the provision of knowingly false witness statements, stands as a profoundly corrupt act, and one that should never have transpired.

Now, your treatment of them as virtual hostages to your whim represents unconscionable misconduct on your part and on the part of the FBI as a whole.

Are you aware that I regularly receive threats that my sons will be forced by their handlers to wield a weapon in public at your directive?  That they will be indicted on charges relating to drug crimes you directed?  That they will be arrested for assault or capital crimes you directed after violating their sovereignty in repeated and reportedly appalling abrogations of their human rights?  That you will further damage their cognitive health or their physical wellbeing?

Mr. Lyons, enough.

You will not escape accountability by further harming my children, just as you will not escape accountability by further harming America's children.

The sovereignty violations you have perpetrated against my family parallel the sovereignty violations you appear to have perpetrated against the nation as a whole in extending fade deployments against our most important elected and appointed leaders.

What has constituted your apparently irrational and obsessive harm of my loved ones has translated to your alleged treason against the nation.

I object, and I daresay the American people object alongside me.

Mr. Lyons, your apologies need now to commence, and they need to be accompanied by your consistent and ongoing demonstrations of genuine humility, sorrow, and remorse.

The funds you have misappropriated from awards extended to me must be returned in full, and you must begin a long and thorough process of atoning for your gratuitous harm against my family and the United States, to which we are loyal.

Your false accusations against me, and against every single one of my immediate family members, must be withdrawn in their entirety without delay, along with the corresponding harm they have justified.

The health harms you have directed against my loved ones and myself must all be withdrawn on a prioritized basis.

Mr. Lyons, the truth usually emerges in situations like this one, when a federal employee has caused harm to the nation with impunity, avarice, unconscionable aggression, and a complete lack of ethics or any perceptible moral boundaries.

Those who wrongfully seek to control and manipulate public officials through wielding disinformation and deceit may ultimately be caught, as you yourself have been caught.

And I hope this will serve as a lesson to your colleagues within the FBI each and every time they consider diverging from their mission and objectives to cause needless suffering toward the nation, to profiteer from their misconduct under color of authority, to defame and prey upon vulnerable Americans without justification, to exploit the young in a manner that brings lasting shame to your agency, to falsify records and evidence for the purpose of knowingly wrongful prosecutions, and to mete out spurious sentences toward the innocent.

History will not view these acts with forgiveness when the full extent of their cruelty and avarice is brought to light.

Mr. Lyons, I look forward to your lawful expressions of atonement, following the immediate cessation of your predation against my loved ones and myself.

These are vastly overdue, it must be said, as is genuine reformation of the FBI's widespread programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, unwanted by our nation, and unnecessary for any of your agency's legitimate goals.

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails recently sent to the attention of your Office.

April 23, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 23, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:32 AM Pacific time.

April 22, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Real Estate Feedback, Confidential, sent at 8:28 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: DEI, sent at 2:25 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 12:13 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Documentation of Recent FBI Allegations, sent at 11:57 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Thank you for your call today, sent at 11:33 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: BPVH and MH, sent at 11:10 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Respite, sent at 10:49 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Addendum to Letter to Tom Lyons, sent at 10:26 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Documents for Listing xx Vxxxx Vxxxx Wxx, Confidential, sent at 6:12 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: An Open Letter to Tom Lyons, sent at 7:29 AM Pacific time.

April 21, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for your inquiry!, sent at 11:01 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fungal RX as Prophylaxis for Birdie and Poppy, sent at 10:55 PM
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Receipts, April 21, 2026, sent at 10:39 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re:Fwd: Care for Birdie MacWilliams/Poppy MacWilliams, sent at 9:56 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Tour of "Lofts on the Mesa," Flagstaff, Arizona, sent at 8:58 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 8:05 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for an Appeal, sent at 12:36 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd:  Battling False Information, sent at 11:18 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Birdie; Safeway, sent at 1:49 AM and 1:57 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Who Controls the Past, sent at 1:07 AM Pacific time.

Request for an Appeal

 1.  The FBI has appeared to state this morning that it will not be relinquishing control of the U.S. government.  May I know your thoughts about this assertion?

Answer:  Oh, I think it will.  After the revelations about the FBI's attempted coup through deploying fades against the entire House and Senate, the entire Executive Branch, a large part of the DOJ, and a significant number of military leaders, I don't think American leadership is particularly inclined to enable more of the FBI's abuses of power.

2.  Will the Congress get the information they require regarding the FBI's conduct in this area?

Answer:  I have no doubt that through FISA withholding, budget withholding, and other methods, the United States Congress can obtain the material they need.

3.  You have said that special emphasis should be placed on identifying those FBI personnel and affiliates associated with your case who have not suffered fade deployments.  May I ask why that is?

Answer:  Because those are the ones who have been deploying fades against others.  Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx have been boasting for years about the American president being a "marionette" due to fade deployments.  I'm sure the Executive Branch, over two administrations, is not going to be particularly happy about those statements.

4.  If Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx are found primarily responsible for the deployment of fades against the elected and appointed leadership of the United States, what is their crime?  Is it espionage, a crime which, ironically enough, they have wrongfully projected onto you and your family?

Answer:  Are they guilty of espionage?  Almost certainly.  (And thank you for clarifying that my family and I are not.)

But more than this, I think there may be charges of treason involved.

So, it is difficult to imagine a more serious result of these men's egregious misconduct against our national security interests over the course of recent years.

5.  These individuals have argued that they have immunity from prosecution with regard to your case.

Answer:  Treason against the government as a whole is likely a different problem for them entirely.  I don't think they have immunity regarding treason, and I don't think any court will be granting it to them.

6.  In retaliation for your alerting the government about the conduct of Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx, the FBI has appeared to advance knowingly false accusations about you and your family not through the Supreme Court, but through a different judge.  Would you like to comment on that conduct?

Answer:  The FBI has allegedly taken false evidence to Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx, yes, with the specific intention of obtaining a concealed capital judgment.

7.  You are choosing not to name the particular Judge alleged to be involved in this scheme.

Answer:  I am not naming her, no, because I don't feel that our judges should be publicly singled out, even in extreme circumstances such as this one.  We need to know that our judicial processes are protected from threats, bribery, and coercion of all kinds.  So we have to maintain these guardrails, even when we suspect that a particular judgment has been corrupted.

8.  Is Txx Lxxxx still attempting to project onto you and your family legal blame for his own alleged capital crimes connected to one or more of your properties?

Answer:  This is what the FBI alleges, yes.  It may be that he is feeling panicked over these new revelations about his crimes against the nation as a whole.  So, he may not want to deal with people who can speak knowledgeably about his criminal history.

9.  What should occur with regard to his approach to Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx with false evidence and the resulting plans to take not only your life, but the lives of your family members and pets as well?

Answer:  I would respectfully ask for an appeal to be filed with the Supreme Court regarding Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx's judgement and sentencing, and I would hope to have the support of our leaders in the U.S. government in doing so on an immediate basis.

10.  The FBI appeared to cause an Achilles tendon tear in your dog two days ago, and now is alleged to have planned with a Flagstaff veterinary office to inject her with a deadly zoonotic parasite known as lungworm disease, in addition to a viral zoonotic infection that is alleged to cause heart attack within several weeks. In addition, there may be other pathogens involved of which you are unaware.   Is this the result of the wrongful judgement for which Txx Lxxxx asked Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx?

Answer:  Absolutely.  The FBI is running its own Crime and Punishment series in which the crimes are, if not made up, then wrongfully attributed to the innocent.  After that, concealed judicial proceedings, judgements and sentencing lead to exactly this type of aggression.

11.  Can this be considered an assassination attempt?

Answer:  I believe so, yes.

12.  What is the appropriate response?

Answer:  The appropriate response is always a lawful one, and hopefully one that exposes the wrongdoing that caused a spurious judgement.  We need to recognize that the FBI is acting not only as the enemy of the United States, but also as the enemy of human sovereignty.  These personnel have had no meaningful checks on their misconduct that diverges from mission and objectives.  And that needs to change without delay.

13.  What is your response to the FBI's assertion that you need to make sacrifices at this time?

Answer:  I'll let the FBI know when I'll be making sacrifices of any nature.  I think it's the FBI's turn to make some sacrifices in its abusive overreach.  The agency's misconduct has led to appalling aggression against the United States government, and now the presumption of trust and confidence in FBI personnel has reached an undeniable nadir.

We cannot allow the agency to return to business as usual, because business as usual for the FBI was treason.

So we need to demand change, and now is the time.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Who Controls the Past?

 1.  There is allegedly an Executive Order to the DOJ to destroy documents relating to your case.  Has that directive been completed as of this time?

Answer:  Not yet, no.  But the allegation is extremely concerning for the nation as a whole.  Who "owns" the documentation created by the U.S. Department of Justice?  The American people do.

And pertinent to this case and many other pressing concerns is whether the American people will retain access to our own history over time.

Will we be able to look back on this period in our history and understand the decisions that were being made on behalf of our people if our most critical documentation has been destroyed?

As George Orwell wrote in 1984, "Who controls the past controls the future."

We cannot allow our past to become falsified, because that loss would doom us to a likely future of disinformation as well.

2.  There is an interim Attorney General at this time.  Is that transition being utilized to achieve certain unlawful objectives?

Answer:  The danger is there.  And, I would observe, we now know that there have been fade deployments against the Executive Branch, so we cannot assume sovereignty within Executive Orders.  

How would we react if we knew that Russia, which has allegedly stolen vast sums from our National Treasury through this case, were ordering the U.S. DOJ to destroy its documentation proving those events?

No one should be rushing to erase proof of decisions of import and consequence for American sovereignty now or in the future.

3.  You have previously designated the Smithsonian Institution as a repository of documentation regarding your case.  Has there been an effort to transfer information relating to your case to the Smithsonian?

Answer:  I have made the point that the Smithsonian Institution needs to maintain an independent endowment in order to effectively preserve U.S. history.  A suppression of U.S. history by the opponents of Americans' long term human rights would have disastrous consequences for our understanding of the impediments to our most critical long term freedoms.

4.  How can we better understand the attempt to "curate" the past by those who stand against our freedom?

Answer:  We might consider the example of a baby being stolen from her parents at birth, and then having the kidnappers burn all evidence of the child's true origins.

Do we as Americans have the right to know where we came from?  Do we retain the right to reconciliation with the past?  Beyond omission and concealment, doesn't our history render our most remarkable future possible?

We all have a tremendous hunger for the truth, even the difficult truth, and as Americans, we have the courage to seek it out.

You asked earlier about the Smithsonian Institution, and I will say that I'm sure there will be an effort to preserve our history against the pressures of loss, politics, and time.

5.  Recently, information has come to light regarding fade deployments against U.S. leaders in the Congress and elsewhere.  Should the results of Congress' investigation into this matter be rendered public at some point?

Answer:  Without question.  American sovereignty can only be defended if this matter is investigated and fully characterized, with Americans' access to this information at the earliest possible time.

6.  Is it true that our own DoD has assisted in the dissemination of fades within the United States, but that it has done so under duress?

Answer:  That seems to be the case, yes.  But I think it's also necessary to point out that many of our military leaders have suffered from fade deployments as well.

7.  Do we have tests to measure retained sovereignty after fade deployments?

Answer:  Truthfully, I don't think traditional psychological and cognitive assessments are particularly reliable in this instance.  The critical steps involve fade withdrawals and sovereignty strengthening for all affected.  Beyond that, we need to ensure that this circumstance will never be repeated.

8.  Government facilities that store and disseminate fades are reported to be fairly evenly distributed throughout the United States.  These are typically metal-walled structures with metal doors, metal flooring and metal roofs.  Yet, most Americans have no idea what these facilities are doing.  Do you have any comment?

Answer:  Congress needs to obtain a comprehensive list of these locations, and to do so without delay, in my opinion.  Each of these facilities can be realistically viewed as a Trojan Horse sitting on U.S. territory.  There needs to be independent oversight of these locations so that they cannot be further utilized to harm the national security interest.

9.  Is it true that some of these facilities are concealed as metal-walled self-storage facilities?

Answer:  The Congress will assess that allegation, I'm sure.  What's clear is that the infrastructure that has allowed for broadscale dissemination of fades must be disrupted, with extensive oversight to ensure that it is not rebuilt elsewhere.

10.  Is there a peace to be made with fades and those who have demanded their deployments within the United States?

Answer:  Outwardly, by all means.  But privately, we need to understand that you can't negotiate with someone who wants your life.  Fades are designed to destroy human self-governance, human sovereignty, human identity, human memory, human depth, and human meaning.  That's a hugely damaging intent, and if we fail to grasp it, we will fail to counter the threat.

11.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Questions to Assist the United States Congress

 1.  It has been suggested that the Congress is weighing RICO prosecution of the manner in which your case is being manipulated for the profiteering of this administration.  May I know your thoughts?

Answer:  If RICO prosecutions have a four-year statute of limitations, as the Supreme Court has suggested, then such a prosecution could occur, yes.

2.  This administration has reportedly forged documents in your name, extended fake donations in your name, and committed other crimes in a scheme of sequestering large amounts from awards that have been extended to you.  Should all of that conduct come to light?

Answer:  You know, this is exceedingly difficult for people who feel that they are not accountable, but I am a person who upholds the truth.  I just do not believe we can rescue human sovereignty without a commitment to the truth.  Yes, the specifics should come to light.

If certain leaders have sustained fade deployments and other sovereignty violations, and these FBI aggressions have caused misjudgments and mistakes among our leadership, then we need to know it all.

But I think it's clear that we cannot rescue American sovereignty by hiding what has transpired.  We just need to be phenomenally courageous about it, and in this way, ensure that we have much more robust defenses against these violations in the future.

3.  What should happen to funds that were misappropriated through criminal conduct relating to your awards?

Answer:  I need to state once again that the risks to Americans' sovereignty that are present through the sequestering of funds by Vladimir Putin and other opponents of human freedom are profound.

Accordingly, we need to ensure that funds that were awarded in this case come back to the greatest extent possible.  We cannot have vast wealth being accumulated by the Txx Lxxxx types within the FBI and among its affiliates.  Their loyalties are with Russia.

Similarly, we cannot have our elected or appointed officials profiteering from the suffering of the public, because the incentives there are disastrous.

And I think that, as critical as the sovereignty concerns are relating to the misappropriations of  funds by the FBI and its affiliates, there are greater sovereignty concerns relating to fade deployments by the FBI, human trafficking crimes by the FBI, torture by the FBI, wrongful directives by the FBI, false reporting by the FBI, defamation by the FBI, concealed prosecutions by the FBI, and meting out of concealed sentences by the FBI.

4.  Successful RICO prosecutions would require the return of misappropriations of funds in this case.

Answer:  Then they should occur, and hopefully, the anticipation of that outcome would halt the outflow of funds based on current criminal schemes.  The National Treasury is not an ATM.  Russia's attempt to turn it into one are profoundly wrong and offensive.

5.  Are these acts of war by Russia against the United States?

Answer: They are better understood as acts of treason by the FBI, the CIA, and their affiliates, who are loyal to Russia.

There is a push for one world government.  The FBI and the CIA understand the origins of that impetus as residing with Russia and others, and so they feel their treasonous conduct can be justified.

6.  Do you disagree?

Answer:  I do.  I believe the American people deserve to know the truth of what is occurring on the world stage and the manner in which their lives will be affected.  Part of that picture is an inflationary policy that is utilizing my case as a conduit for vast money printing and misappropriations, over my strenuous objections and to my family's great peril and my own.  That is a Russian agenda, not a domestic one.

Now, with our understanding of the FBI's widespread fade deployments, we can get a clearer view into the manner in which the FBI and its affiliates have sought to perpetrate an invisible coup toward the nation as a whole.

7.  The Congress must be shocked over this disclosure.

Answer: Everyone should be shocked over this disclosure.

8. The Congress recently renewed the FBI's FISA 702, which allows the aggregation of communications of Americans through a large-scale surveillance program, but only for ten days.  What is your view of that decision?

Answer:  My praise to the members of Congress.  I believe our elected leaders are requiring an explanation from the FBI regarding fade deployments, and they're holding the agency's feet to the fire until they get the information they need.

9.  Are there specific questions the Congress should be asking?

Answer:  When J. Edgar Hoover died, it was discovered that he had directed and maintained extensive "Official and Confidential" files on virtually all members of Congress, and every President during his tenure as FBI Director, including "reams of information" about their families, their friends, and their contacts.

If I were a member of Congress currently, I would be asking for complete files about each member of the House and Senate.  Because, allow me to observe,  fade deployments are only perpetrated when the FBI is claiming that the intended "host" has done something wrong.

I have been speaking about knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting for a long time.  

The Congress should now see how it applies to them and to their families, not merely to me and mine.

10.  Are there any other specific questions they should be asking when it comes to fade deployments?

Answer:  Fade deployments are often first directed to the pet of a targeted individual, with a later transfer of the fade to the intended host.  So the Congress should be asking about deployments to their pets that may have later affected them.  The FBI will have all of these records.

11.  You have said that fade deployments serve to hollow out the victim's personality over time.

Answer:  That's true.  Over time there is reported to be a diminishment of affect, conscience, ethical engagement, higher order reasoning, the quality and character of decision-making, the depth of human bonds, the capacity to love others, loyalty toward others, the extent and quality of emotional memory and factual memory, and the boundaries that prevent reckless sexual or violent acts.

12.  Is the deployment of fades fundamentally intended to deconstruct human self-governance?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  It can be understood as an attack on the human race as a whole, and one that is not intended to be withdrawn.

It would be difficult to imagine an assault against our national security that was more serious.

13.  Will you be commenting further on fade deployments over this critical period of time, when the Congress is making urgent assessments as to the damage wrought by the FBI against our national security interests?

Answer:  Yes, certainly.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Fades Further Illuminated: Russian Origins of the "Existential Threat" to American Sovereignty

 1.  How do you respond to FBI allegations that your disclosures regarding the FBI's deployment of fades against U.S. leadership represents an "existential threat" to the nation?

Answer: Well, I think that's quite a projection.  For Vladimir Putin to attempt a hidden coup of the United States by directing the FBI to deploy fades against our Congress, our Supreme Court, our Executive Branch, certain members of the DOJ, the U.S. military leadership, and even certain key state governments -- this is the existential threat to our sovereignty.

2.  What about Russian threats regarding the deployment of non-conventional weapons?

Answer:  Vladimir Putin has often discussed the use of non-conventional weapons, but only in the context of other conflicts.  He always wants to project blame onto certain "radical factions" in order to absolve himself from the moral stain that history would attribute to him.  So, we need to be fully educated about his thinking in this regard, and maintain the pressure on him by letting him know he will be held fully accountable for any such acts.

The truth is that fades represent non-conventional warfare in and of themselves, and those within the FBI who have directed their deployment against U.S. leadership have engaged in treasonous acts.

3.  There can be no justification for the deployment of fades in this circumstance?

Answer:  Fades represent an enslavement of our leadership and our nation as a whole.  No, there can be no justification.

It's important to understand just how insidious fade deployments are.

The "hosts" of fade deployments ordinarily have no idea that they have been affected.  Even so, gradually, they are going to experience an erosion of their character, personality, identity, moral compass, empathy toward others, boundaries, ethical framework, decision-making and conduct.

They may recognize that there is a change in their decision-making, but they are highly unlikely to understand the origins of that change.

In other words, they still feel as though they are making independent determinations, even when they are not.

These are parasitic deployments that involve a gradual hollowing out of individual character.

So, they go right to the heart of who we are as human beings, including our ability to make the most important decisions affecting our lives and the lives of those surrounding us.

4.  Does the FBI need broad scale fade deployments to achieve its mission and objectives?

Answer:  Absolutely not.

Fade deployments against U.S. leadership have been perpetrated for the purpose of totalitarian control over the United States by a foreign adversary, and for no other reason than this.

5.  The FBI states that your sons have suffered "stacked" fade deployments involving ten or more fades each.  How much individual control over decision-making can an individual exert if they have suffered ten or more fade deployments?

Answer:  Zero.  It's just too great a burden for any one individual to sustain.  

6.  So, the individual's original character, personality, boundaries and decision-making -- in the event of such stacked deployments -- are effectively ...?

Answer: Annihilated.  They simply cannot defend against wrongful directives in that state.  

7.  And the FBI is fully aware of this?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  They extend these stacked deployments when they intend to render someone guilty of criminal acts that the handlers themselves direct.  It becomes a "Crime and Punishment" puppet show for the FBI, a stage play in which they exercise full control.

8.  And has the FBI demanded false witness statements from your sons when they have been burdened by these extreme "stacked" fade deployments?

Answer:  This is the FBI's allegation, yes.

9.  False witness statements regarding their childhoods?

Answer: Exactly so.  This is what the FBI has suggested.

10.  What are your thoughts about this?

Answer:  I know my sons extremely well.  I know the strength of their character.  They never would have signed false witness statements if they had been in possession of their sovereignty.

11.  What should happen next for your sons?

Answer:  The fades should be withdrawn in their entirety, and my sons should be allowed to give their true testimony as to the torture they have suffered at the hands of the FBI and its affiliates.  Whether or not that information is rendered immediately public is up to them.  But it needs to be documented as part of the formal record, because there is the possibility that great good can result from their accounts.

If we care about the long term sovereignty of Americans, then we need to hear from my sons and daughter-in-law.

12.  What about those who would wish to suppress that testimony, because they are concerned that they will be blamed for wrongfully authorizing these acts of torture?

Answer:  If they have suffered fade deployments themselves, then they are in a position to take the larger view for the good of the nation.  In other words, if their judgment could possibly have been compromised, then the truth about the perils for all of us regarding diminished sovereignty need to be openly evaluated.

Again, we cannot solve this problem without courage, honesty, integrity and disclosure.

We need to be stronger than our adversaries expect us to be.

The United States has always had a capacity for self-examination, and that might just serve to rescue the cause of human sovereignty.

This is tough territory.  Let's demonstrate that we're up to the challenge.

13.  How do you think about problem-solving in general?  Because these are unprecedented problems for our country, and yet you seem to hold to the belief that we can surmount them.

Answer:  I think about problem-solving in terms of transformation.  The hardest problems can be harnessed to their own destruction, in a way.  

Once we comprehend the means of attack with regard to a deployment such as that involved with fades, we can illuminate it and dismantle it by going after the origins and methods of dissemination.  Fades are not indestructible.  We need to demonstrate that we have greater resilience and adaptability than they do.

14.  Should the use of fades be prohibited as acts of war in both a domestic and international context?

Answer:  Without question.

15.  Once the U.S. Congress fully characterizes what has happened domestically with regard to fade deployments, should we notify other countries about these developments?

Answer:  This is a worldwide concern.  Yes.

16.  How are you yourself feeling, given that you have suffered stacked fade deployments in unknown number?

Answer:  I am feeling fantastic about having exposed this issue for our nation's sovereignty and the sovereignty of all those we will influence.  It just gives me great pleasure to be in the position to shine a bright light on this critical concern, knowing that now we will have the chance to defeat it.

17.  Who inspires you when you are required to stand alone on a critical issue?

Answer: My parents. My grandparents.  Many outstanding leaders throughout history, including Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Jr., Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton.  

Leadership is not always about having a lot of company in the beginning.

Sometimes, it means that you are standing alone, speaking for the cause of freedom, not knowing whether anyone can hear your words.

But if we believe in the indomitable human spirit, we're going to try anyway, in the hope that, as Abraham Lincoln said, we can attain a "new birth of freedom," and that human sovereignty, with all its attendant gifts, "shall not perish from the Earth."

18.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams