1. The FBI is allegedly being required to provide critical information to the United States Congress with regard to its crimes of deploying fades against the nation's most important leaders.
Answer: So I understand.
2. Are these disclosures overdue?
Answer: Terribly overdue, yes.
3. What will complete FOIA reports about the members of the U.S. Congress reveal?
Answer: They will reveal that the FBI has been accusing our elected and appointed officials of all manner of crimes of which they have no knowledge whatsoever.
4. With the ability of the FBI to perpetrate Pegasus-style hacks of cell phones and computers, does the agency have the capacity to place information on the electronic devices of law-abiding citizens that citizens do not know is present? For example, could the FBI place unlawful pornographic material on the cell phones of law-abiding Americans without their knowledge or consent?
Answer: Pegasus-style hacks require a "mirror phone," which is a phone with the same IP address as the phone of a given individual being targeted by the FBI. And there is complete third-party control over the device from a remote location. So, yes, unlawful material can be placed on the cell phones of honorable Americans without their knowledge or consent, easily.
5. Did you receive a threat that the FBI had perpetrated this falsified law enforcement reporting against your own phone or against the phone of one or your family members?
Answer: Yes, the agency typically threatens to place child pornography onto the phone of a "target of interest." When the FBI really wants to arrest or murder an individual, this is a go-to strategy. I do receive threats pertaining to my family members and myself all the time.
But of course the agency is perpetrating these crimes against many Americans, and members of Congress could easily be among the victims of this false reporting.
6. What if the FBI is unwilling to release complete documentation to members of Congress about themselves?
Answer: I have faith that the Congress will insist on complete information, with the understanding that fade deployments are predicated on accusations of crimes having been committed. Congress needs this information, and I have confidence that the honorable members of the House and Senate with persist until they obtain it.
7. From a bigger-picture perspective, why would the FBI create and aggregate knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting about each and every American citizen? What is the larger objective here? And isn't the FBI responsible for telling the truth in all circumstances?
Answer: The FBI has redefined itself as only partly a federal law enforcement agency. It now identifies primarily as a national security agency. Law enforcement officers are responsible for telling the truth. National security personnel are not. As a result, we are now seeing FBI officials lying with abandon, and the truth is that they possess immunity in doing so.
You asked why the FBI would gather all of this disinformation about members of the American public, but the answer has now been rendered illegal to provide.
To answer your question, I would simply say that we should look to history for the lessons it can provide. During the Holocaust, those being wrongfully targeted were accused of many heinous crimes they never committed. False reporting was used in the 1930's and 1940's as an excuse for mass murder, and this is well documented.
8. You have linked the FBI's crimes of falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public to the fact that we are now facing a major climate crisis. Can you expound on that connection, please?
Answer: The FBI is well-aware that we have overtaxed the Earth's environment to a crisis point. The reality is that the agency has determined that global population numbers have to come down in order to reach sustainability vis a vis the climate.
9. What are the agency's numbers with regard to sustainability? What population can our global environment sustain?
Answer: With our current technologies, the global environment could sustain, at the outside, 3 billion people. The FBI's targets are considerably less, with fewer than 1 billion people projected as the agency's goal required to achieve sustainability.
10. How does the FBI intend to take the world from 8.3 billon people to one-tenth or one-eleventh of that number?
Answer: How indeed?
11. Your point is that we are experiencing a fundamental disconnect between governance and the governed.
Answer: We are, without question. Our government has been unwilling to tell the truth about the severity of our climate crisis in a way that the American people can grasp. And the issue has remained politicized, so there has been virtually no hope of conveying this crisis point accurately without suffering tremendous setbacks at the polls.
12. No one wants to be the bearer of bad news, and no one wants to hear it. Is that the case?
Answer: Yes, undoubtedly. That's why I would have partnered with our military leaders early on in order to ask that our generals, who have all had access to the climate simulations, speak to the public about the critical changes we needed to make.
This would have de-politicized the issue, and it would have enabled the public to understand the seriousness of the crisis toward which we were heading.
13. But when should that approach have commenced?
Answer: Forty years ago, because we needed the time in order to bring our numbers into line with requirements for sustainability.
14. So, we missed the window of opportunity in which the government could have partnered with the public honestly.
Answer: Yes, we did.
15. How would you characterize our circumstances now?
Answer: I would characterize them as the eleventh hour. Global populations will come down and very dramatically, and the FBI knows this quite well.
16. How will this take place?
Answer: There will be a great deal of upheaval, and we will see both ostensibly "natural" and manmade disasters.
The American civilian population is almost entirely unprepared, and so is the global civilian population.
There is no valuable journalism on this subject, and there isn't going to be.
17. Why not?
Answer: Because the FBI has made a priority of targeting independent journalists. The agency does not want to be exposed for its role in the approaching challenges, and it does not want to be remembered by history for having deceived and betrayed the American people.
So, the press is not going to be able to help us, and most of them don't have the scope of knowledge required to do so, in any case.
18. What is the role of the President in this astonishing predicament?
Answer: The Commander in Chief has a critical role to play, obviously. We always need to attend to the manner in which our top leaders are addressing the most critical issues shaping our global future. Are they making things better for us, or worse? Are they being as honest with the public as possible, or are there many defining developments that are being concealed? Does the public understand the factors that are shaping its future, or are they almost entirely ignorant?
I think it's a great tragedy when the public doesn't understand what is happening to them and why.
19. But you've said it is now the eleventh hour, and we're in a terribly compromised position.
Answer: That's correct. We needed a much higher level of candor with the public much earlier, and I would apply this observation to President Truman onward.
20. Why President Truman?
Answer: President Truman became aware of certain developments immediately following World War II, and he elected to hold that information in secret from the American public. He founded the national security agencies in a semblance of their form today, and he deferred certain revelations that, in many ways, have rendered our current plight inevitable.
Truman made the wrong call, obviously, and we're now paying the price for that concealment.
There was a thought that the American public could not handle certain surprising revelations, but I feel that this approach constitutes a fundamentally cowardly way to govern.
Again, we had too much focus on poll numbers and elections, and not enough emphasis on respectful and honorable engagement with the public.
The question now is whether we will have a future opportunity for our government to realign with the truth in its conduct toward the American people.
21. Do you believe that we will?
Answer: We need to identify all the critical inflection points, past and present. But yes, it is possible that we will. In any case, it is incumbent upon honorable people to strive for that chance.
22. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
