1. Your children are apparently not being allowed to provide you with documentation guaranteeing their retirement from all government programs -- this by order of the President, allegedly. What is your response to this decision?
Answer: It is unacceptable.
2. The President seems to be fearful of the truth your children might disclose regarding their torture and harm at the hands of their agencies under this administration. Is that correct?
Answer: That does seem to be the case.
3. Does the President still have your children and daughter-in-law on an assassination list?
Answer: The FBI appears to allege that this is the case, yes.
4. Do you believe that they are at substantive risk of being further harmed because their agencies and this administration are so afraid that they might talk openly about the astonishing harms they have suffered?
Answer: Oh, yes. The FBI hates loose ends. In general, the agency tries quite consistently to murder its detractors.
5. It is reported that the FBI and its affiliate agencies provided your children and daughter-in-law with settlements today, but have not involved you in ensuring that those funds will be protected from incursions by the very predators who have harmed them in the first place.
Answer: Yes, that's correct. I have no involvement in any payouts to my children at this point. My own conditions for provisions to be made to my children have not yet been met.
Their handlers are instructing them not to sign guarantees of no further involvement in government programs. And this signals clearly that they are not retired and the government will not let them go.
6. Do you view your sons and daughter-in-law as hostages to the Trump administration at this point?
Answer: One hundred percent. Their communications devices are still in place. They can be raped, trafficked, or tortured at will, and they have no recourse.
7. What are the chances that the FBI will honor commitments to the DOJ not to further harm your children and daughter-in-law?
Answer: Zero.
8. You have no trust in the FBI and its affiliate agencies to prioritize the safety of your children.
Answer: My children have been tortured by the FBI. The men responsible, whose names I know, have not been held to account. So, no, trust is long gone.
9. How safe is it for you to be together with your children at this point?
Answer: Demonstrably unsafe. On Saturday, my older son brought multiple fxxx deployments into my home at the directive of his handler, with predictably harmful results within 24 hours.
10. Could those particular harms result in the loss of your life?
Answer: Easily. I have been receiving daily threats from the FBI of massive coronary infarction or rapid cortical volume loss due to this one deployment alone.
11. What narrative is your older son's handler pushing at this point?
Answer: He's trying to push psychosis, paranoia, or delusional thought disorder in the context of bipolar illness, perhaps with a little depression or anxiety thrown in. This is just a DSM IV grab bag for the FBI. They will allege anything and everything they can.
12. Do you suffer from any mental illness whatsoever?
Answer: I do not.
13. Is your son's medical care for illnesses caused by the FBI dependent on his false allegations in this realm?
Answer: My son seems quite desperate and illogical about this issue, extending assertions as non sequiturs in the middle of a conversation. Basically, he seems to be suggesting that anyone who has ever heard of the FBI or malfeasance by the FBI is suffering from mental illness.
14. What do you make of this stratagem?
Answer: You know, I think Txx Lxxxx is in trouble, and he sees a false assertion of mental illness as the most likely route to get him out of it.
15. The FBI would like to misappropriate funds awarded in your name and connected to your identity, wouldn't it?
Answer: I'm sure there are many people who would like to do so.
16. In the meantime, what do you make of apparent FBI assertions that Delta Whistler Village Suites in British Columbia, Canada has been pressed by the FBI to work up a false series of statements regarding alleged crimes that occurred in the hotel or in the town of Whistler, BC?
Answer: You know, the manager of the Hotel stated in writing that all guests and staff had found my time there utterly honorable and lawful in every regard. Is the FBI capable of working up a set of false allegations well after my departure from the Hotel?
I have no doubt that this would be possible. I did leave items in storage with the Bell Cap, and a portion of these were ultimately thrown away.
Further, the FBI seems to be encouraging me to return to Canada, which would correspond to a false set of allegations there, if they exist.
17. What would the FBI try to do with a false set of allegations in Canada?
Answer: Well, they consistently take false allegations to a judge, whether in the United States or in Canada, and they endeavor to come away with a sentence of capital punishment.
18. Without a defendant's being present to defend him- or herself?
Answer: Absolutely.
19. Is this what Txx Lxxxx is now attempting to do?
Answer: He may have already accomplished this, given the daily encouragement I am receiving to travel to Canada. So, there may now be a necessity to appeal these wrongful proceedings dictated by Txx Lxxxx in the first place.
20. Do you know to what Canadian authority you would appeal for assistance?
Answer: No idea, and I would ask the OIG Hotline to advance an appeal on my behalf.
21. What are the odds that your life could be taken on a trip to Canada under the circumstances of a false conviction?
Answer: Oh, they're quite high. There was an attempt on my life on July 19, 2025 while I was in Canada at a dog park with my two puppies, for instance. A woman and a man who had traveled to Whistler from Montreal, three thousand miles distant, and South America, coordinated a very serious assault as part of the Pxxxxxx Program.
22. How severe was the trauma?
Answer: It caused me to suffer a heart attack, a concussion, and pleural effusion, so the circumstances were extremely serious.
I would take pains to clarify that the Canadian government did not seem to be apprised of this assault ahead of time.
Rather, it seemed to represent a sovereignty violation toward Canada.
23. What was the motivation for that assault on the part of the FBI and its affiliates?
Answer: Oh, it was purely financial. The FBI and its affiliates wanted to profiteer from my demise. It's as simply as that.
24. And all the false reporting perpetrated by Txx Lxxxx and others was intended to wrongfully justify this assault?
Answer: Yes, it was.
25. Was Txx Lxxxx attempting to perpetrate yet further false reporting during your stay in Canada?
Answer: It certainly seemed so. There was a three year old standing in the hallway alone outside my suite for several minutes after 10:00 PM at night on one occasion. (I did not open my door, but reported the incident to the Hotel.). On another occasion someone had entered my hotel suite and placed a child's hair band on the floor, an incident I also immediately reported to the hotel involved, which was not Delta Whistler Village Suites. But these incidents were extremely unsettling, given my knowledge of the ways in which the FBI plants evidence and manipulates disinformation.
26. Do you have the impression that Txx Lxxxx might be attempting to falsely implicate you wherever you go in an effort to exonerate himself from crimes he allegedly directed or committed at one or more of your properties?
Answer: Yes, I think he is persisting because he doesn't see any other way forward for himself. If he is proven to be a liar (and for the record, I think this has already happened), he will suffer career penalties at the very least.
The unspoken rule within the FBI is that personnel can break any law in existence, but they cannot get caught.
27. How can Txx Lxxxx back out of this trap of false reporting by which he is apparently snared?
Answer: There is a rumor that he is endeavoring to blame my honorable parents for his crimes, which I will not accept.
What can he do to move beyond this impasse of his own false reporting by which he is trapped?
If he is not courageous enough to assume responsibility, he can state that there was unlawful access to the property during my family's absence, which is true.
But all attempts to blame my family members or me must be abandoned.
And I don't want to be hearing any other allegations along this line ever again.
My sons and daughter-in-law need to be exempted from all future participation in government programs of any kind whatsoever.
And I should have outreach which allows resolution to my standards regarding this case to date.
28. Those concerns include most immediately your requirement that your sons and daughter-in-law retire from all government programs and lawfully guarantee that they will not participate in the future. Is that correct?
Answer: It most certainly is.
29. Will you please keep us apprised of how your family is managing?
Answer: I certainly will.
30. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.

Lane Macwilliams