My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Thursday, February 5, 2026

Express Request of the OIG Hotline for Strict Adherence to All Conditions

 OIG Hotline, this is to expressly prohibit the transfer of funds awarded in my name and/or my identity to my sons or daughter-in-law in excess of those limits already delineated for your Office.  

To reiterate, following herewith are the conditions on which any provision to my two sons and daughter-in-law may be made.

Thank you for your careful adherence to all requirements listed here.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*********************************************************************************

I hereby suggest that amounts that have been previously awarded to my two sons and daughter-in-law by the OIG Hotline for crimes perpetrated against them by the FBI and its affiliates, not to exceed one billion dollars per person, be provided to each of my two sons and daughter-in-law from awards that have been extended in my name, a variation of my name, or associated with my identity. 

This provision is contingent upon the following:

  • It must be determined that all conflict of interest standards are being met.
  • My two sons and daughter in law can only accept this provision if they agree to permanently foregoprior to the provision,  all involvement in government programs or contractor programs related to the government, including the Pxxxxxx Program, now and in the future.  Various legal options for their guarantees should be explained to them, including their right to claim disability status in light of their need to recover from the trauma they have already suffered.  Documentation of their binding guarantees not to be involved in any government programs now and in the future must be provided to me before any provision is extended.
  • Funds provided to my two sons and daughter-in-law cannot be held within FBI accounts, FBI affiliate-agency accounts, FBI associate accounts, or government accounts.  In other words, they need to be publicly held, just like other normal citizens.  I must receive notification of pending settlements to my two sons and daughter-in-law before the provision is extended.
  • To prevent misappropriation of funds extended to my two sons and daughter-in-law under this provision, my husband and I must both ensure that the capital is substantively retained over time, which is to say we must both have a role of oversight, guaranteeing that funds are not siphoned off, lost through speculative investment or misappropriated by disreputable advisors.  All funds are to remain in trusts established for each of my two sons and daughter-in-law.  Investments must be approved by us in advance, and management of the awards must be overseen with our help so that further victimization of my two children and daughter-in-law does not occur.  My two sons and daughter-in-law cannot be expected to protect themselves or their belongings, given the sovereignty violations that have been perpetrated against them over time.
  • The restoration of the full health, both physical and psychological, of my two sons and daughter-in-law is to be paid for by the FBI on an indefinite basis, given that the FBI is entirely responsible for this gratuitous and cruel harm.  All communications devices enabling directives from their respective handlers to my two sons and daughter-in-law are to be permanently removed, and my two sons and daughter-in-law are to have no further communications with their handlers, their agencies, organized crime personnel who are affiliated with the FBI and its fellow agencies.  They are only to have communication with government personnel with regard to the restoration of their health and wellbeing, in addition to the fulfillment of this provision.
  • My two sons and daughter-in-law are to be allowed to speak the truth of their harrowing experience to their family members, who love and uphold them in every circumstance.
  • Physicians and/or mental health personnel who may endeavor to assist the recoveries of my two sons and daughter-in-law are to be strictly prohibited from providing witness statements of any kind about my two sons and daughter-in-law to any third parties.
  • Similarly, the family, professional colleagues, friends and acquaintances of my two sons and daughter-in-law are to be strictly prohibited from providing witness statements of any kind about my two sons and daughter-in-law to any third parties.
  • Any "convictions" of my two sons and daughter-in-law for following their handlers' directives are to be vacated.
  • Any charges toward my two sons and daughter-in-law are to be withdrawn without renewal.
  • Fxxx deployments and/or jxxxx deployments toward my two sons and daughter-in-law are to be withdrawn in their entirety and never renewed.
  • My two sons and daughter-in-law are to have rehabilitation and expert care to re-establish their full sovereignty and health in every measure.
  • Defamation of any kind by the FBI or its affiliates toward my two sons and daughter-in-law is to be strictly prohibited.
OIG Hotline, please let me know whether these conditions can be met.  I will be informing my sons and daughter-in-law of this request on my part.  These beloved children deserve to recover from the needless trauma they have experienced at the hands of the malevolent and avaricious individuals within the FBI and among its affiliates.



Emails to the OIG Hotline, February 4 and 5, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see my communications to your Office from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, bearing the following subject headings and date/time stamps.  This list will be updated throughout the day.


February 5, 2026:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: STORAGE SPACE ALMOST AT MAXIMUM, sent at 9:42 AM Pacific time.


February 4, 2026:


  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: The Natural Resources Defense Council, Board Members Re: The NRDC's Role in a New Initiative to Preserve and Expand the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:31 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: World Wildlife Fund Board Members Re: WWF's Role in a New Initiative to Preserve and Expand the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:30 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: The National Park Conservation Association Re: The NCPA's Role in a New Initiative to Preserve and Expand the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:29 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: The Nature Conservancy, Board Members Re: The Nature Conservancy's Role in a New Initiative to Preserve and Expand the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:27 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Sierra Club, Board Members Re: The Sierra Club's Role in a New Initiative to Preserve and Expand the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:26 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Chandler Green Re: EDF's Role in a New Initiative to Protect and Expand the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:25 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Raul Arce-Contreras Re: EDF's Role in a New Initiative to Protect and Defend the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:24 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: EDF's Role in Protecting and Expanding the National Parks of the United States, sent at 9:15 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Request on Your Behalf; Outreach, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:37 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd:  Your Legally Documented Separation From All Government Agencies, Entities, Contractors and Employees As of Now, sent at 4:09 PM and 4:20 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Intervention Re: Inserted Typographical Error by the FBI Intended to Further Victimize the Son of a Human Rights Advocate, sent at 3:23 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Complaint Re: Obstruction of Signing, February 4, 2026, sent at 2:37 PM Pacific time.










Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Emails to the OIG Hotline, February 3 and February 4, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see recent emails to your Office from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com.  This documentation will be updated.

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: False Evidence from the FBI, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:46 AM Pacific time on February 3, 2026.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: GTM Text, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:15 AM Pacific time on February 3, 2026.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Thank you for your donation to NRDC!, sent at 7:23 PM Pacific time on February 3, 2026.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Request on Your Behalf; Outreach, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:53 PM Pacific time on February 3, 2026.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Three Hostages Whose Freedom Is Delayed, sent at 8:03 PM Pacific time on February 3, 2026.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Extension of Deadline, sent at 3:23 AM Pacific time on February 4, 2026.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: I Believe in You, sent at 4:38 AM Pacific time on February 4, 2026.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Complaint, GTM Health, sent at 4:55 AM Pacific time on February 4, 2026.

Extension of Deadline

 OIG Hotline, my older son has indicated a willingness to sign documents which will guarantee that he declines to participate in any government programs or government-affiliate programs now or in the future.

Seventy two hours from my original requirement for this material will not allow sufficient time for these materials to be adequately prepared.

As a result, I will extend this deadline through Saturday February 7, 2026 for my older son.

It appears clear that my younger son and daughter-in-law will require an in-person discussion regarding this requirement.  As a result, I will follow up with your Office regarding this timing.

As soon as documentation from my older son is complete, I will provide this information to your Office.

Thank you for waiting to fulfill my provision to my sons and daughter-in-law until this requirement can be satisfied according to my standards.

Please allow me to extend written communication to my brother regarding the matter of his freedom from all further tasking through government programs prior to the fulfillment of my provision to him as well.

Again, I will update your Office with this information at the earliest opportunity.

I appreciate your support with these procedural concerns, upon which avoidance of conflict of interest relies.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Tuesday, February 3, 2026

Three Hostages Whose Freedom Is Delayed

 1.  Your children are apparently not being allowed to provide you with documentation guaranteeing their retirement from all government programs -- this by order of the President, allegedly.  What is your response to this decision?

Answer:  It is unacceptable.

2.  The President seems to be fearful of the truth your children might disclose regarding their torture and harm at the hands of their agencies under this administration.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That does seem to be the case.

3.  Does the President still have your children and daughter-in-law on an assassination list?

Answer:  The FBI appears to allege that this is the case, yes.

4.  Do you believe that they are at substantive risk of being further harmed because their agencies and this administration are so afraid that they might talk openly about the astonishing harms they have suffered?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  The FBI hates loose ends.  In general, the agency tries quite consistently to murder its detractors.  

5.  It is reported that the FBI and its affiliate agencies provided your children and daughter-in-law with settlements today, but have not involved you in ensuring that those funds will be protected from incursions by the very predators who have harmed them in the first place.

Answer:  Yes, that's correct.  I have no involvement in any payouts to my children at this point.  My own conditions for provisions to be made to my children have not yet been met.  

Their handlers are instructing them not to sign guarantees of no further involvement in government programs.  And this signals clearly that they are not retired and the government will not let them go.

6.  Do you view your sons and daughter-in-law as hostages to the Trump administration at this point?

Answer:  One hundred percent.  Their communications devices are still in place.  They can be raped, trafficked, or tortured at will, and they have no recourse.

7.  What are the chances that the FBI will honor commitments to the DOJ not to further harm your children and daughter-in-law?

Answer:  Zero.

8.  You have no trust in the FBI and its affiliate agencies to prioritize the safety of your children.

Answer:  My children have been tortured by the FBI.  The men responsible, whose names I know, have not been held to account.  So, no, trust is long gone.

9.  How safe is it for you to be together with your children at this point?

Answer:  Demonstrably unsafe.  On Saturday, my older son brought multiple fxxx deployments into my home at the directive of his handler, with predictably harmful results within 24 hours.  

10.  Could those particular harms result in the loss of your life?

Answer:  Easily.  I have been receiving daily threats from the FBI of massive coronary infarction or rapid cortical volume loss due to this one deployment alone.

11.  What narrative is your older son's handler pushing at this point?

Answer:  He's trying to push psychosis, paranoia, or delusional thought disorder in the context of bipolar illness, perhaps with a little depression or anxiety thrown in.  This is just a DSM IV grab bag for the FBI.  They will allege anything and everything they can.

12.  Do you suffer from any mental illness whatsoever?

Answer:  I do not.

13.  Is your son's medical care for illnesses caused by the FBI dependent on his false allegations in this realm?

Answer:  My son seems quite desperate and illogical about this issue, extending assertions as non sequiturs in the middle of a conversation.  Basically, he seems to be suggesting that anyone who has ever heard of the FBI or malfeasance by the FBI is suffering from mental illness.

14.  What do you make of this stratagem?

Answer:  You know, I think Txx Lxxxx is in trouble, and he sees a false assertion of mental illness as the most likely route to get him out of it.

15.  The FBI would like to misappropriate funds awarded in your name and connected to your identity, wouldn't it?

Answer:  I'm sure there are many people who would like to do so.

16.  In the meantime, what do you make of apparent FBI assertions that Delta Whistler Village Suites in British Columbia, Canada has been pressed by the FBI to work up a false series of statements regarding alleged crimes that occurred in the hotel or in the town of Whistler, BC?

Answer:  You know, the manager of the Hotel stated in writing that all guests and staff had found my time there utterly honorable and lawful in every regard.  Is the FBI capable of working up a set of false allegations well after my departure from the Hotel?

I have no doubt that this would be possible.  I did leave items in storage with the Bell Cap, and a portion of these were ultimately thrown away.  

Further, the FBI seems to be encouraging me to return to Canada, which would correspond to a false set of allegations there, if they exist.

17.  What would the FBI try to do with a false set of allegations in Canada?

Answer:  Well, they consistently take false allegations to a judge, whether in the United States or in Canada, and they endeavor to come away with a sentence of capital punishment.

18.  Without a defendant's being present to defend him- or herself?

Answer:  Absolutely.  

19.  Is this what Txx Lxxxx is now attempting to do?

Answer:  He may have already accomplished this, given the daily encouragement I am receiving to travel to Canada.  So, there may now be a necessity to appeal these wrongful proceedings dictated by Txx Lxxxx in the first place.

20.  Do you know to what Canadian authority you would appeal for assistance?

Answer:  No idea, and I would ask the OIG Hotline to advance an appeal on my behalf.

21.  What are the odds that your life could be taken on a trip to Canada under the circumstances of a false conviction?

Answer:  Oh, they're quite high.  There was an attempt on my life on July 19, 2025 while I was in Canada at a dog park with my two puppies, for instance.  A woman and a man who had traveled to Whistler from Montreal, three thousand miles distant, and South America, coordinated a very serious assault as part of the Pxxxxxx Program.

22.  How severe was the trauma?

Answer:  It caused me to suffer a heart attack, a concussion, and pleural effusion, so the circumstances were extremely serious.

I would take pains to clarify that the Canadian government did not seem to be apprised of this assault ahead of time.

Rather, it seemed to represent a sovereignty violation toward Canada.

23.  What was the motivation for that assault on the part of the FBI and its affiliates?

Answer:  Oh, it was purely financial.  The FBI and its affiliates wanted to profiteer from my demise.  It's as simply as that.

24.  And all the false reporting perpetrated by Txx Lxxxx and others was intended to wrongfully justify this assault?

Answer:  Yes, it was.

25.  Was Txx Lxxxx attempting to perpetrate yet further false reporting during your stay in Canada?

Answer:  It certainly seemed so.  There was a three year old standing in the hallway alone outside my suite for several minutes after 10:00 PM at night on one occasion.  (I did not open my door, but reported the incident to the Hotel.). On another occasion someone had entered my hotel suite and placed a child's hair band on the floor, an incident I also immediately reported to the hotel involved, which was not Delta Whistler Village Suites.  But these incidents were extremely unsettling, given my knowledge of the ways in which the FBI plants evidence and manipulates disinformation.

26.  Do you have the impression that Txx Lxxxx might be attempting to falsely implicate you wherever you go in an effort to exonerate himself from crimes he allegedly directed or committed at one or more of your properties?

Answer:  Yes, I think he is persisting because he doesn't see any other way forward for himself.  If he is proven to be a liar (and for the record, I think this has already happened), he will suffer career penalties at the very least.

The unspoken rule within the FBI is that personnel can break any law in existence, but they cannot get caught.

27.  How can Txx Lxxxx back out of this trap of false reporting by which he is apparently snared?

Answer:  There is a rumor that he is endeavoring to blame my honorable parents for his crimes, which I will not accept.

What can he do to move beyond this impasse of his own false reporting by which he is trapped?

If he is not courageous enough to assume responsibility, he can state that there was unlawful access to the property during my family's absence, which is true.

But all attempts to blame my family members or me must be abandoned.

And I don't want to be hearing any other allegations along this line ever again.  

My sons and daughter-in-law need to be exempted from all future participation in government programs of any kind whatsoever.

And I should have outreach which allows resolution to my standards regarding this case to date.

28.  Those concerns include most immediately your requirement that your sons and daughter-in-law retire from all government programs and lawfully guarantee that they will not participate in the future.  Is that correct?

Answer:  It most certainly is.

29.  Will you please keep us apprised of how your family is managing?

Answer:  I certainly will.

30.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane Macwilliams


Monday, February 2, 2026

Request for Support with Documentation

 OIG Hotline, I can only proceed with provisions to my sons, daughter-in-law and brother if each of them individually confirms that they will no longer participate in any government programs whatsoever.

To do otherwise would be to allow conflict of interest in my case, which I expressly prohibit.

Having said that, it is considered a felony for my sons, daughter-in-law, or brother to acknowledge that they have been involved in government programs heretofore.

As a result, I suggest the following language in their documentation to be provided to me:

I, (named individual), hereby formally and legally decline any and all current and/or future participation in any government programs and government contractor programs whatsoever, thereby permanently excusing me from receiving, acknowledging, or agreeing to any assignments or commands from any individual who is affiliated with government agencies, initiatives, training programs, transportation programs, elected officials, appointed officials, law enforcement personnel, national security personnel or the military of the United States of any other nation whatsoever.

This legal commitment is to be considered permanent, binding, and effective immediately.


Signature: (named individual)

Date:


Today, my older son's handler appeared desperate when he directed my son to utter declarations like "If you loved me, you would not be asking me to sign anything!"

These sound like the protestations of a young child, and they are certainly not originating from my older son himself.

The FBI and its affiliates created unconscionable conflict of interest when they forcibly recruited my relatives and loved ones in the first place, intending all the while to coerce false witness statements from them.

Now, my task is to undo a portion of that astonishing and ongoing harm toward my family.

I will appreciate your Office's support in this regard.

It is obvious that only a person with extensive conflict of interest would decline to sign a binding agreement preventing future conflict of interest.

Yet, my relatives cannot free themselves from this tautological trap that prevents them from acknowledging their plight.

Is your Office able to instruct the FBI and its affiliates to cease and desist in their obstruction of my sons', daughter-in-law's and brother's binding refusal to participate in government programs and government contractor programs now and in the future?

I will be able to contribute in a much more focused way to the nation if I am not worrying about the rape, trafficking and torture of my loved ones.

Accordingly, I respectfully request your urgent assistance in permitting my loved ones' resignations to proceed, thus allowing their recoveries to commence.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Emails to the OIG Hotline, February 2, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your attention from lanemacwilliams@gmail.com on February 2, 2026.  Please note that this list will be updated throughout the day.


  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: The Truth, sent at 10:04 AM (an email originally sent to my older son and forwarded to the OIG Hotline with commentary)