My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Tuesday, May 5, 2026

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your attention.  Please note that this list is not complete:

May 4, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Missing FedEx Package, sent at 10:22 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Expanded Background Information, sent at 1:27 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Court Filing, May 4, 2026, sent at 6:12 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:44 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 11:42 AM Pacific time.

May 3, 2026
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:25 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Re: May 2, 2026, sent at 12:31 AM Pacific time.

May 2, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: My Lawful Right to Vote, sent at 5:15 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Confirmation of Lease Correction..., sent at 5:06 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Carol Elaine Von Herzen..., sent at 4:27 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Documentation Pertaining to Identification, sent at 1:59 PM Pacific time.

May 1, 2026
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: No Utility Charges..., sent at 10:25 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Pacific Gas and Electric..., sent at 10:03 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 2:26 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Current FBI Threats, sent at 1:59 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Ticket Assistance, sent at 1:03 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: GTM Texts, sent at 11:22 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: By Living and Helping Others to Live, sent at 12:41 AM Pacific time.

April 30, 2026

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 30, 2026, sent at 11:51 PM Pacific time.

Monday, May 4, 2026

Coconino Superior Court Filing, May 4, 2026

OIG Hotline, I would redact proper names below, except for the fact that it is possible that I am still being accused by the FBI and its affiliates of malfeasance of which I have no knowledge.  Under such circumstances, and without investigative reports or contact from an honorable intermediary, the risks are simply too great for me to remain silent about the identities of the individuals who have committed the most egregious wrongs concerning this case.

If immediate and honorable outreach occurs, and if my court filing is respectfully and appropriately handled, then and only then, my filings can be removed from my blog, not before.

Accompanying my petition was a copy of my lease, my diriver's license, my social security card, my birth certificate, my marriage certificate, documentation from my husband, and limited real estate POA's, along with general background concerning my parents, children, husband, birth place, birth date, known assets, etc.  The inclusion of my passport appears to have been wrongfully obstructed, so I will need to add it to my petition as soon as possible.


Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams


 May 4, 2026


To the Honorable Judge assigned to preside over my request to change my name from Carol Elaine Von Herzen to Lane MacWilliams:


I am a current resident of Coconino County, Arizona, as you see from my materials included herewith.


It is important that you know that I am a human rights advocate in a federal case pertaining to the FBI’s commission of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public.  This case has been, and continues to be, adjudicated before the Supreme Court with the support of the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice.


I have assiduously and continuously sought complete documentation of corrupt law enforcement’s perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting through Freedom of Information Act requests and state public information act requests, and have been provided with some interesting proofs of this apparently wide-scale problem.


Through a provision of documents required of the FBI from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence several years ago, I learned that a corrupt local Sheriff’s Deputy, Rick Chaput, in San Mateo County, California, where I lived at the time, took a stalking report from my husband and myself only to proceed to refer me – unbeknownst to me or any of my family members – to “Adult Protective Services,” apparently with the intention of justifying extensive and ongoing surveillance of my entire family and myself.


Later, when I spoke to an employee of a women’s shelter in Sacramento in the course of my research on this issue, she disclosed to me that many women in California were denied requests for information about stalking complaints through the Freedom of Information Act and the California Public Records Act.


In other words, it appeared that there was a pattern of local law enforcement within California withholding public information requested by stalking victims – and whether these women were suffering stalking from law enforcement affiliates is unclear – and further, in speaking to women’s shelter staffing, it appeared that many of these women believed that they were being improperly surveilled as part of this problem.


Were many of them being referred to Adult Protective Services with false statements from law enforcement questioning their mental health, as apparently had occurred in my case?


This appears to be a distinct possibility, given that the vast majority of my requests for information through the Freedom of Information Act, as well as an international background check I ran (at a cost of several thousand dollars), including a fingerprint scan, addressing any and all records within the United States and other countries to which I had traveled (Canada, France, Portugal, Zimbabwe, and Zaire) were returned to me as blank.


As part of this quest, I should disclose that several years ago, a corrupt FBI official named Tom Lyons apparently tried to force me to sell my family home on Cape Cod. Allegedly the FBI skims several percentage points off the realtors’ commissions in forced sales of the properties of “targets of interest,” and this scheme is treated as a kind of “profit-sharing” sideline within the agency.


If I refused to sell, Tom Lyons appeared to threaten to drive the value of my home to zero through undisclosed means.  (It was unclear whether my main residence in San Mateo County, California was also included in this apparent threat.)


I did refuse to sell, and, subsequently, appeared to receive threats that my family home on Cape Cod had been treated as a staged crime scene of some kind by the FBI, with Tom Lyons leading all crimes related to this conduct.  Falsified DNA evidence was reported to be part of this staging, though I have received no verified communication regarding this issue.


I have received myriad apparent threats regarding the matter of the saleability of both of my homes due to reported predatory acts directed by Tom Lyons, along with his reported close affiliate in Russian organized crime, a man named Brandan Pesa.


And, as it happens, my husband now wishes to sell our Portola Valley (San Mateo County, CA) home and to assist with the sale of my family’s Cape Cod property at this time. (My own personal view is that the attempt to list and sell one or both of our properties should force the hand of the FBI to reveal any and all false accusations regarding these homes and their affiliated land.  So, I am now in favor of this development.  Please note that, as Tom Lyons appears to have been recently cornered on this issue, he is alleged to be casting false blame for serious crimes upon my virtuous and honorable parents, now deceased, Janice Elaine Von Herzen and Richard Pierre Von Herzen.  They are not here to defend themselves, so I continue to defend their laudable character and integrity throughout their lifetimes.)


At this point, I have taken on the role of advocating for the long term human rights of all Americans, because it has been alleged that the U.S. DOJ has extended very large sums as awards against FBI malfeasance in my case.


The problem seems to be that false accusations are regularly filed against me in a concealed manner, and misappropriations are regularly drawn from accounts in my name, thus perpetuating a process of significant graft by certain top government officials.  


For the record, I have difficulty taking my dogs for a walk without being besieged by “witnesses” who are alleged to later file false claims about the lawfulness of my communications, my cell phone screen, whether my dogs are aggressive (definitely not), and more.


Often, false reports are alleged to pertain to the well-worn misogynistic tropes of mental instability and promiscuity.  (Female targets of interest are alleged to be delusional, lacking the capacity for self-care, a danger to the public, and voraciously sexualized and predatory toward others, including minors.)


For your own knowledge, I do not suffer and have never suffered from mental illness. I happen to have had only one intimate partner over my lifetime, that of my husband of thirty-five years.  I own no weapons, although I do use kitchen utensils while cooking in the kitchen.  I have threatened no one and I never will threaten anyone.  I am protective toward others, both vulnerable and hearty members of the public, respecting others’ human rights at all times and in all settings.  And I am an entirely peaceable, honorable, and law-abiding person.


I am undertaking this request for a name change because it has been alleged that the current Executive Branch intends to direct the misappropriation of all awards in this case through the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice on the basis of the discrepancy between my birth certificate, which reads Carol Elaine Von Herzen, and my current identification (driver’s license, passport, social security card, etc.) which reads Lane MacWilliams.


So, I would like to have a court order that renders my name, Lane MacWilliams, official, in order to protect my human rights advocacy and the support for the American public that I intend to continue to render.


As part of this name change application, there is a question about whether I have ever been accused of a felony or convicted of a felony.  I have no proof that either has occurred, but I suspect that my case at the federal level has been exploited for the profiteering of top elected officials for a prolonged period of time, to include knowingly false accusations followed by presumed exoneration on an ongoing basis.


For your additional information, my husband is alleged by the FBI to have been falsely accused of “espionage” activity, and my sons are alleged to have been forcibly recruited into a corrupt government program, which I will redact here as the Pxxxxxx Program, involving intentional harm toward the public, directed by federal agencies.  My older son appears to be falsely reported upon in the categories of “illegal weapons trafficking” and “terrorism.” And my younger son appears to be falsely reported upon in the categories of “drug trafficking,” “failing to register as a foreign agent,” and other crimes.  Both of them have reportedly suffered human trafficking by their respective agencies (the FBI in the case of my younger son and an affiliate agency in the case of my older son), shock treatment, near-drowning, food and water deprivation, sovereignty violations, directives to cause harm to others,  and other injuries in the demand for knowingly falsified witness statements about our family.


Unfortunately, the FBI’s abuse of our family members, colleagues and friends does not appear to stop with my sons, but allegedly extends to my daughter in law, my brother, my uncle, my aunt, my ministers, and many other family members, friends, colleagues and associates – all in the quest for knowingly false witness statements which are intended to bolster false FBI claims, apparently originating with Tom Lyons and his close affiliate Brandan Pesa.


However, I would like to point out that false reporting about the American public appears to represent widespread policy for the FBI, and my case – while uniquely egregious in its abuses by the agency – is part of an apparent larger effort by the FBI to create a dossier of false reporting which wrongfully implicates every American citizen, including minors, of wrongdoing that could serve to justify their harm.


The FBI often likes to state that it needs falsified law enforcement reporting because of the pressures of global concerns relating to a climate crisis which is much more severe than has been acknowledged by public officials.


But my contention is that the FBI wants falsified law enforcement reporting in order to exert control over the financial, social, professional, educational, and medical spheres of the American public’s personal lives.  The agency does not need it to fulfill its mission and objectives.


And further, there is no plan to sunset programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  These false dossiers, increasingly AI-generated, will be created, aggregated, and disseminated in perpetuity unless insightful and insistent advocates such as myself object at this juncture with clarity, principle and determination on behalf of the nation as a whole.


The American people cannot defend themselves against lies they cannot examine.


Therefore, I respectfully request that you communicate with the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice regarding my name change request.


You will certainly receive extensive communication from the FBI, regardless.


At issue is whether or not the FBI’s false reporting will be loaded into the publicly accessible court records associated with my name change request, information which I have been repeatedly denied despite my assiduous efforts to obtain it.


What are my thoughts about this juncture?


I would ask that the Honorable Judge involved in this case speak with me directly about the alternatives.


I am not hiring an attorney to handle this matter, because the FBI has used attorneys in the past to communicate misleading counsel.  So, I would rather that this issue be handled more directly.


Do I wish to be defamed by the FBI by AI-generated films, photos, false witness statements and wrongful accusations in the public record when I have been deprived of all of this information through my lawful requests?


No one would want such an outcome.


Having said that, if this is the only way to force the FBI to disclose the problem of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the honorable American public, it might be a viable tool for change in the course of my advocacy.


Your Honor should know that I currently have an Arizona Public Records Act request with the Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’ Office, with documentation pending.


Attorney General Mayes will come under extraordinary pressure as part of this request, as will, regrettably, you yourself.


My recommendation for mitigating that pressure is to move quickly and decisively, and to involve me in the decision-making.


The longer an individual waits regarding a critical matter pertaining to knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI, the greater the opportunity for the FBI to threaten and bribe family members, friends, and associates.


So, delay is the enemy for good people combating false reporting by the FBI.


And communication with the investigators of integrity within the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice (oig.hotline@usdoj.gov)  is key. (Please note that the Hotline is distinct from the standard OIG of the U.S. DOJ.)


Thank you for allowing me to provide this background, your Honor, and I look forward to the opportunity to speak with you about this circumstance, if you feel that is most appropriate.


Respectfully,




Lane MacWilliams

Sunday, May 3, 2026

Calling Out Executive Conflict of Interest

Duncan Sayer MacWilliams, my beloved son,

It is understood through the highest level of legal precedent throughout the nation, and internationally, that victims of torture cannot provide credible witness statements to their tormentors.

The fact that this administration continues to direct you unlawfully to provide knowingly false information about our family members represents an appalling and egregious wrong -- and one that cannot go unanswered.

The rumor that you and Mary are currently residing in a property in New York City which is owned by the highest elected official in our nation brings into focus an astonishing conflict of interest.

At issue is whether the Executive Branch has dispensation to hold you and Mary as virtual hostages to the falsified law enforcement reporting against which I have worked for the last eight years running.

Does the President have the right to order that you be subjected to shock treatment, near-drowning, beatings, human trafficking, wrongful orders, continuous threat of untreated illness, arrest, death and more in his quest for funds awarded in my case, funds which he can misappropriate if you falsely attest to the character and conduct of our family members?

No, my beloved child.  He does not.

And I will speak to President Trump directly about this matter if I am asked to do so honorably.

The President has crossed a line with regard to his treatment of our family, and he has crossed it many times.

I am here to express that that conduct, to the appalling harm of our family and the American people, both, is unacceptable.

FBI staff member, Tom Lyons, who freely gave me his business card and invited ongoing dialogue when I met him years ago in Hillsborough, CA at a public event, is alleged to have directed desecration of our family home on Cape Cod, allegedly in a quest to "drive the value to zero" of our property when I declined to sell it at his directive.

Now, instead of facing a criminal sentence, which would be most appropriate, Tom Lyons is continuing to direct you to sign your name -- under the most grievous distress -- to false testimony concerning your father and me, your grandparents, and even your brother.

Tom Lyons and his close affiliates would rather murder our entire family than face accountability for his criminal predatory acts in this matter.

I have a better idea.

Tom Lyons now needs to publicly acknowledge that he has lied about this case from the very beginning, and has profiteered to vast degree from our suffering and that of the American people as a whole.

Beyond this, he needs to stop his unconscionable abuse of our family, which includes you, Mary, Graham, Uncle Mike, Aunt Margaret, my brother Brian, and many others, in his predatory quest for false witness statements to bolster his accusations.

This change can only manifest if he is forced out of concealment and into the public square, where I am waiting to speak with him, lawfully and honorably, about his crimes.

And you, my beloved son, are to be rendered free from Tom Lyons' ongoing predatory abuses of power, so repugnant to people of good conscience and integrity.

Tom Lyons has allegedly described his current circumstance as a "crisis," a "predicament," a "turning point," and "the biggest risk yet."

I'm sorry he has placed himself in that position through his consistently criminal choices regarding our family and our nation as a whole.

But that's where my sympathy for the man ends.

The FBI appears to urge me to remain silent this morning because the agency has given me symptoms of diabetes Type 1, Crohn's disease, rales, myocarditis, and more, through undisclosed means.

Again, my ideas about this subject are clearly more reasonable.

The FBI needs to remove its improper conference of symptoms of illness from our family -- all symptoms -- and stop using the lever of suffering and death as a cudgel with which to punish its ethical superiors among America's true leaders.

Duncan, when you were growing up, I didn't think I would need to teach you about the dangers of totalitarianism.  I had not experienced its manifold harms, and I had no basis of reference upon which to draw.

When faced with coercion on the part of the Executive Branch, the FBI, the CIA, and others, the manner in which each person will respond is unique to them.  After the shock of institutional depravity has worn off, each person needs to decide whether to comply with wrongful directives or to resist them.

For me, my fealty to the territory of my soul outweighs other considerations.  I choose never to be false, predatory, harmful, or malicious, as these qualities are anathema to my identity and my personhood.  

And I embrace my honesty, my virtue, my benevolence and my faith even while knowing that the FBI wishes to kill me over these gifts.

How can I criticize you as a victim of torture for the choices you are making in an attempt to survive Tom Lyons' wrongful schemes?

This is not possible.  

And, once again, I would simply say that our judicial system needs to excuse you, as a victim of torture, from all further demands for false witness statements intended to ensure the irretrievable harm of all of our family members, as well as all other "assignments" that would require you to cause harm to others or yourself.

The Executive Branch needs to support its own separation from my children, immediately and permanently, in recognition of the appalling violations of conscience and humanity that it has allowed to persist, authorized, and indeed profited from, in this case.

I will be writing about this matter daily until I receive investigative reports or until I receive honorable outreach regarding my concerns.

History is a harsh master for some, and I invoke it now.

The misconduct of this administration will be writ large on history's page, as will Tom Lyons' crimes against our family, and the appalling misdeeds of his close affiliates unless these men begin an immediate and lifelong apology for their misconduct.

That is just.  That is meet.  That is overdue.

I love you, Duncan Sayer MacWilliams, now and always. Hold this truth within you at all times, and let it fortify you in the challenges at hand.

Mom

Friday, May 1, 2026

The FBI Comes Face to Face with the Righteous Indignation of the American Public

1.  A politician recently stated, apparently with regard to your case, that "the rules are the same for everybody."  May I please have your response to this assertion?

Answer:  First of all, I don't know the context in which this statement was made.  But obviously, the rules are not the same for everyone.  Ask Bryan Kohberger if the rules are the same for everyone.  Ask the Central Park Five if the rules are the same for everyone.  Ask any person who has been wrongfully convicted based on false DNA evidence if the rules are the same for everyone.  And keep in mind, while you're at it, that those who have wrongfully framed the innocent in these cases have immunity from prosecution.

The corrupt law enforcement officials involved have never been formally punished for lying to a court, and they never will be criminally prosecuted.

So, the assertion that the rules are the same for everybody is patently false.  And my work over the past eight years in opposing knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting has focused on the fact that we cannot expect to have a worthy nation emerge in the future from "rules" which allow wayward law enforcement officials to lie with impunity against the rest of us.

2.  What about the FBI's argument that the climate crisis is now so severe that law enforcement officials need to lie about the public in order to justify certain Draconian solutions to the pressures on the environment?

Answer:  It's no longer lawful for the public to comment on this subject directly.  But I need to repeat that the FBI does not need falsified law enforcement reporting to achieve its mission and objectives.  

The agency wants falsified law enforcement reporting in order to manifest totalitarian control over the American public in perpetuity; but it doesn't need this stratagem, and our government should not be allowing it.

There is no plan to sunset these programs.

And now, people are talking about maintaining data centers, which serve to create, aggregate, and disseminate this false reporting, as satellites, separate and apart from any human access or accountability on Earth.

So, this is a disaster in the making, clearly.

The notion that human beings will not lose control of AI-generated false reporting in all of its forms is starkly delusional.

For humanity, this will mean that to ask certain questions is completely forbidden, to challenge certain authority, especially unjust authority, will be punishable by death with no due process, and to be intelligent and expressive will translate to a survival disadvantage.

Without change, we will see a dramatic diminishment of human potential across the board.

3.  You do not ascribe to the FBI's belief that the "ends justify the means" when it comes to false reporting in the law enforcement sphere?

Answer:  Absolutely not.  Behind closed doors, everyone needs to be acknowledging that the FBI represents unjust authority, and further, that the agency should be decommissioned as soon as it is possible, given certain requirements.

As proof of this assertion, the FBI recently committed High Treason in deploying fades against virtually all national elected and appointed leaders in the United States.

So, in the middle term, the FBI will have to go.

4. There will be no way for the government to negotiate with the FBI?

Answer:  You cannot negotiate with someone who wants your life.

The FBI wants the life of the United States.  It stands firmly opposed to our national sovereignty.

So, no.  The agency will have to be decommissioned at the earliest possible point.  This is not in debate, and I don't believe our leaders have any doubt about this necessity.

5.  What about the individuals within the FBI who have falsely accused you and your family members of their own crimes?

Answer:  These are serial killers who have been elevated to a position of authority. And I just need to express that, if our government will tolerate this, the American people will not.  This isn't a difference of opinion or heartfelt beliefs or philosophical divergence.  This is a question of murderers in the FBI blaming the innocent for their own predatory conduct.

That's wrong. It was wrong yesterday, it's wrong today, and it's still going to be wrong tomorrow.

6.  Why hasn't the government been able to rein in these perpetrators within the FBI and associated with the FBI?

Answer:  Because no one wants his or her children to suffer rape, trafficking, torture, shock treatment, near-drowning, drug overdose, brain damage, forced conscription, sovereignty violations, and more, like my children have suffered at the hands of the FBI and its affiliate agencies.  That's why.

7.  Yet you are naming those men who have tortured your family, because you feel there is no other way forward.

Answer:  When you reach the point at which the FBI is obtaining wrongful convictions through concealed court proceedings against your family members and yourself based on fake DNA evidence, it's time to name the names.  You cannot protect the serial killers who are endeavoring to murder your whole family for profit.  

And an ethical person cannot keep silent regarding the FBI's wrongful prosecutions in the past.

You just reach a moment at which the very foundations of your personhood are on the line.

At that point, you need to take charge where others have failed.

8.  What do Tom Lyons and his close affiliates need to do at this time?

Answer:  Acknowledge that they lied from the beginning of this case and appoint an honorable intermediary to begin a lifelong apology.

9.  You have said that the appropriate word for your response to years of false reporting by the FBI is outrage.

Answer:  Outrage, righteous indignation, deep spiritual offense -- all of these words apply.

And the entire American public is going to be experiencing them alongside me, I assure you.

10.  You are insisting that the FBI meet your ethical standards regarding your case and that of others as well.

Answer:  That is correct.

11.  Do you require complete exoneration regarding your family members and yourself?

Answer: I do.  And I also require my family members' honorable discharge from all government programs.

12.  Are you also asking for the resolution of other cases to your satisfaction?

Answer:  Yes, this is necessary.  We cannot tolerate the endurance of injustice.

13.  Assuming Tom Lyons acknowledges his lies about you and your family members, what will happen to him?

Answer:  The OIG Hotline should ensure that every penny he stole throughout this case comes back to my account, as well as assessing astronomical liabilities to others involved in this scheme of false reporting.

The question of his freedom is another matter, related to treasonous crimes against the nation as a whole.

14.  Is there any excuse for the gratuitous harm this man has caused to your family?

Answer:  None.  He has caused us incalculable, intentional, needless, reckless, and irretrievable harm.  There is no justification whatsoever.

15.  What about those within the government who have said that your family is an "acceptable sacrifice" for their own welfare?

Answer:  Well, this is always what it comes down to with those who argue that "the ends justify the means."  What they really mean is that their gain justifies the public's suffering.  And ultimately, when an FBI official stakes his entire career and reputation on lying about the most serious crimes possible, he has a conflict of interest in arguing that the silencing of his victims serves some "greater good" than that of his own enrichment, entitlement, and impunity.

Do you know how you can tell who is virtuous in a situation like this?

The virtuous person is saying, meet me in an open courtroom and let's have this discussion in the full view of the American public.

Liars do not want that outcome, and, in fact, they will go to murderous lengths to prevent it.

16.  Could Tom Lyons meet you in an open courtroom?

Answer:  The man would never have the courage to do so, in my opinion.

Could he be dragged there against his will by a civil suit regarding his astronomical liability to me?  That's possible.

17.  You are not willing to have your beloved parents, or any other family members, wrongfully blamed by the FBI.

Answer:  I am not.

18.  Given that your sons were wrongfully conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program, does the Pxxxxxx Program often sacrifice its own people?

Answer:  All the time.  In fact, everyone conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program is slated for death after a certain point.  The FBI simply doesn't want anyone left to tell the tale.  It's too monstrous a story, and government agencies wish to preserve their reputations in a historical context.

19.  What is your response when the FBI claims that your sons have to die because they "know too much"?

Answer:  Did the agency ask my permission for this conclusion, or is this a thought they are trying to think on their own, without adult supervision?

The FBI should not be trying to make any further decisions about my family members.  They have proven their judgment to be abysmal.  We don't need any further demonstrations of that fact.

20.  What about the argument that you should not be naming Tom Lyons as your accuser?

Answer:  He freely gave me his business card at a public meeting.  Why does Tom Lyons have the right to falsely accuse me of the most heinous crimes, yet exert wrongful authority to prevent my robust self-defense?  The Constitution says that I have the right to face my accuser in a court of law.  Bring it on.  This man either needs to face me through due process, knowing that I will reveal all I know about his crimes, or he needs to concede defeat at this juncture regarding his lies -- one or the other.

21.  What should happen to your properties, given the alleged crimes of Tom Lyons and the FBI against you and your family members?

Answer:  That's up to the Congress and the DOJ, keeping in mind that the FBI should not be allowed to impoverish a human rights advocate through predatory acts.

22.  Has the FBI ceased trying to cause you harm within your apartment building, Aura apartments, at this time?

Answer:  My apartment appeared to have been wrongfully entered yesterday afternoon, so, no, the FBI has not yet understood its position regarding my safety and security.

23.  Will you please keep in close contact with us, given these astonishing circumstances?

Answer:  Of course, yes.

24.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Thursday, April 30, 2026

NOT a Difficult Decision

OIG Hotline, this is to document that the actual killer of the four college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022 was close FBI affiliate and Russian organized crime figure Brandan Pesa, not Bryan Kohberger, the young man who was wrongfully convicted of this heinous crime.  FBI staff member Tom Lyons is alleged to have been directly involved in the planning and execution of this egregious violence.

There are hundreds of sealed documents regarding the trial that convicted Bryan Kohberger, because the FBI argued that the Pxxxxxx Program, under which auspices this violence was committed, must be maintained a secret from the American public.

Yet it is also the Pxxxxxx Program which has allegedly been directed to harm my family members and myself.

Mr. Kohberger allegedly pled guilty to the crimes due to the fact that the FBI intentionally conveyed HIV to him during his time in prison, and threatened to allow him to die without treatment unless he wrongfully confessed.

The agency committed extensive DNA tampering regarding the evidence in this trial.  The original judge, unsympathetic to the FBI, was removed from the case.  The house in which this horrific crime occurred was demolished by the University of Idaho at FBI directive prior to the verdict being rendered.  And the local police chief who was forced to follow FBI directives regarding these events is now retired.

My offer to Bryan Kohberger's attorney to stand as a witness in defense of Mr. Kohberger was improperly ignored.

I often think of Bryan Kohberger and his family, just as I think of me and mine.

The innocent should not be accused and preyed upon by men such as Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa.  Rather, it is necessary to battle back with the truth, so that at least the public can grasp the predatory objectives of the FBI in wrongfully preying upon its honorable betters.

Mr. Kohberger deserves release from prison, and my family deserves complete exoneration, both on an immediate basis.

And I will continue to write about these events until and unless I have honorable and peaceable outreach that meets my ethical requirements for Mr. Kohberger's case and my own.

Good people, this is NOT a difficult decision.

Not at all.

I remain most sincerely an advocate for the long term human rights of the American people,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see recent emails to your Office, listed below.  Please note that this documentation will be updated throughout the day:

  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 30, 2026, sent at 11:51 AM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Legal Name Change Procedure, sent at 3:22 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 2:49 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Notes to Myself, sent at 2:40 PM Pacific time.
  • Fwd: ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: UA ENVS MS Application Update, sent at 2:23 PM Pacific time.
  • ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Facing a Recalcitrant FBI: Can Wisdom, Reason, Judgment and Goodwill Prevail, sent at 12:21 AM Pacific time.

Facing a Recalcitrant FBI: Can Wisdom, Reason, Judgment and Goodwill Prevail?

 1.  What are your thoughts about the so-called "evidence" Txx Lxxxx and the FBI continue to throw before various courts regarding the harms they themselves perpetrated against your properties?

Answer:  It's exceptionally easy to malign people who are not present to defend themselves.  The FBI has been creating fake DNA evidence for years, apparently.  In general, judges do not know the extent of the FBI's capabilities in this realm.  So, the FBI just treats courtrooms as a playground in which they are making up the games, the rules, the players, the whole narrative.

And if I defend myself publicly, in this forum, I will be accused of disclosing confidential information -- confidential information used in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting to which I have been objecting as a human rights advocate for the last eight years.

It's not that the system is merely unfair.

It's designed to convict the wrong people.

And we have seen many examples of this within the Black community, when corrupt law enforcement officials submitted fake evidence to courts in order to guarantee rapid convictions, which ultimately were overturned.

So, the FBI has been working in this realm, with very clear objectives.

2.  What are those objectives?

Answer:  The FBI wants to be able to accuse any American of any crime at any given moment and have confidence that they can dictate the outcome.  That's totalitarianism, and it has been advancing within the American judicial system for years.

Michael German has written convincingly about the FBI's "criminalization of black identity."

And, of course, the FBI has criminalized all "targets of interest" through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.

3.  How can the FBI be getting away with these crimes of false reporting?

Answer: I've discussed this before, but fundamentally, federal law enforcement officers are obligated to tell the truth, but national security officers are not.  The FBI is now defining itself primarily as a national security agency.

4.  Can our national sovereignty survive a lying FBI?

Answer:  No, it cannot.  We can have no illusions about this point.  It's not just that the FBI has lied to and about me.  It has also lied to Congress, to the DOJ, to the U.S. military, to the Executive Branch, to the Supreme Court, and to the American people in deploying fades against our leadership and a substantive part of the American public.

So, no.  We will have no sovereignty as long as the FBI is allowed to lie. The tools the agency is currently wielding are too powerful.  If allowed to persist, the FBI will prevail over all wisdom, reason, judgment and goodwill.

5.  Is there any determination on the part of our leadership to alter the FBI's current course?

Answer:  I cannot imagine that our leadership would not be furious over the FBI's conduct regarding the fade deployments.

How will that pushback weigh in the balance with the FBI's mission and objectives currently?

We will see.

Often throughout history we have seen that psychopathic institutions push their advantage when they have determined that they are needed and cannot be easily replaced.

6.  How will history remember the FBI?

Answer:  How, indeed?  A primary question on the minds of the FBI leadership is whether history can be suppressed through acts of first-degree murder.  Can history be killed, in other words?  The FBI believes it can, but I think their hubris on this point, as on many others, is misplaced.

7.  What about your documentation within the Smithsonian Institution?  Will it be preserved within Smithsonian auspices for Americans in perpetuity?

Answer:  I don't know.  As with so much about this case, I am acting on good faith in the hope that the Smithsonian has, at my directive, been granted an independent endowment, and further, that crucial information about this case will be preserved for the public to assess.

8.  What is the answer to resolving the FBI's crimes against your properties, and related crimes against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  The FBI has claimed secrecy surrounding its crimes against my properties, and I have explained that that means the agency doesn't have license to present false accusations in concealed court proceedings to wrongfully argue for my family members' deaths or my own.

The FBI cannot have it both ways.  It cannot ask me to protect information regarding its malfeasance while still falsely accusing us at every turn.

9.  Who is able to place those boundaries into effect for the FBI?  Who is in charge of the guardrails?

Answer:  Not many people, and I would venture to say they all have suffered sovereignty violations over time. Any person who wields some form of authority over the FBI, and I include myself in this statement, has suffered from fade deployments.

Basically, the FBI has been unwilling to concede to any outer controls or limitations from American leadership.

10.  Now, will the agency be forced to withdraw its false accusations against you and your family members?

Answer:  I would like to see it happen immediately, yes.

11.  Will the agency be forced to withdraw all fade deployments from American leadership and the American people?

Answer:  This would be the best possible outcome of these revelations.  I hope our leaders insist on that withdrawal and I hope they won't relent until it is verifiably accomplished.

12.  Will you please keep us updated with regard to your family's wellbeing and your own?

Answer:  Certainly.  

13.  Will you please let us know whether you are being treated honorably and respectfully in your current residence in Aura Flagstaff, Arizona?

Answer:  Of course.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us tonight.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams