A Letter to Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs

 

Sent to Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs via email on Friday, April 17, 2026 at 10:46 AM Pacific time, with receipt confirmed at 10:46 AM Pacific time.

Dear Governor Hobbs:

I am happy to be visiting Arizona for the first time in many years, currently staying in Flagstaff and considering a rental home here.

Governor Hobbs, you may know that I stand as a human rights advocate in an important federal case before the Supreme Court regarding human rights violations perpetrated by the FBI against the honorable American public.  I support the long term sovereignty of all Americans, despite astonishing incursions by the FBI and its affiliates into fundamental freedoms of United States citizens that are intended by the agency to represent indefinite losses.  Many of these FBI violations relate to knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public, together with affiliated harm.

As a direct result of my ongoing support for our most fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech, peaceable assembly, freedom of the press, and the right to own private property, I have drawn the special attention of the FBI, which appears to maintain a retaliatory perspective.

The agency has suggested that it will render it impossible for me to locate a rental home within Flagstaff, and that, even if I were to secure a home, the agency would perpetrate various environmental harms to the property that would render it an unsafe domicile -- this, as a supposed "national security" prerogative.

My point to the FBI has always been that totalitarianism, permanently ensconced in the architecture of the governance of the United States, is safe for no one.

One particular FBI agent with strong ties to Russia has suffered repeated disciplinary action by the DOJ as a direct result of his unwarranted false reporting regarding my human rights case, and he appears to be persisting in his wrongful assertion of authority within Flagstaff.

Specifically, my requests for rental housing tours remain unanswered, and the FBI appears to extend ongoing threats to harm any property I might secure, even for a stay of three to six months.

I am certain that such conduct violates Arizona's fair housing statutes, as well as federal law.  Accordingly, I wonder whether your administration might assist me in requesting honorable follow up to my housing inquiries to tour available rental homes at xxxx South xxxxxxxx Rd. and xxx xxxxx Rd.  My attempts to fill out housing applications online are being blocked altogether, so realtors may need to assist me with hard copy application forms.  My husband and I do own two homes and our joint income is high.

I do have my two beloved dogs, Poppy and Birdie, with me.  These trusted pets, on whose judgment I have come to rely, appear to love Flagstaff more than any other place we have visited over thousands of miles on our current travels.  They are never wrong about people or places, I find, and for this and many other reasons, they are cherished traveling companions.

Are there ways in which I might contribute to Arizonans' human rights if I am unable to remain in the state, with my safety reasonably assured?  I have no doubt that there are.

I have committed to advocate for Americans' futures in a bi-partisan way, because awards extended to me through the U.S. DOJ are very substantive, and I have allocated a portion of them to foundations for specific causes that will assist the nation as a whole.

But within this framework, there are myriad worthy and, indeed, transformative goals that can be accomplished.

Perhaps if I am supported in remaining in Arizona for a time, we can further explore the many ways in which I might support the future of Arizona as a whole.

Thank you for any efforts your administration might extend on my behalf in the meantime.

With kind wishes and best regards,

Lane MacWilliams

Congressional Investigation of Fade Deployments as an Urgent Matter

 1.  People appear to be upset with you, because of the fact that you have identified fades as having compromised both Democrats and Republicans.  Is that the case?

Answer:  It would appear to be the case, yes.  But I think that our leaders need to understand that the point of fades is total control over humanity in general.  Fades don't really care about your political leanings.  Fades are deployed for the purpose of co-opting the human will.  So, all of our leaders are going to find themselves affected, and if we didn't see compromised decision-making, compromised ethics -- that would be the surprise.

Our leaders need to ask themselves not whether the public might discredit them or discriminate against them if they have suffered fade deployments.  Rather they need to ask themselves whether they possess the moral courage to assess whether their decision-making has changed in any substantial way considering their long-held standards and values.

This isn't about popularity or campaigning or polls or legacy-shaping.  

This is about the future of human sovereignty and whether we are going to have any.

So, we need our leaders to be identifying themselves first as members of the human race who support the self-determination and freedoms that we hold as foundational to a meaningful human society.

Maybe later, we can talk about less critical matters like our children's Little League games, and our dinner recipes, and our political leanings.

2.  Is the Congress going to be able to subpoena information about the deployment of fades against the House and Senate, the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, the Executive Branch, and others?

Answer:  I hope this will be considered an urgent matter for the Congress to take up, yes, and on both sides of the aisle.

3.  What about you yourself?  What is it like to know that fades have been deployed against you as a human rights advocate?

Answer:  Well, fades make it necessary to face the hardest things, because the reality is that they are deployed with the intention of killing their victims, but only after destroying their independence and sovereignty.  So, we have to look at those worst possible outcomes and we each need to make some decisions about our boundaries and our limits.  No one wants to have his or her identity stolen.  No one wants to be deprived of his or her God-given selfhood and ability to make decisions that derive from a lifetime of character-building.

4. You have repeatedly asked that the fades be withdrawn, but that hasn't happened.

Answer:  No, it hasn't.

5.  What is your feeling about that fact?

Answer:  It's extremely upsetting, of course, to know that one's government intends to commit first degree murder of a human rights advocate in this manner or any other.  After you get over the initial shock of that realization, you begin to ask about the most meaningful ways you can contribute to the future of human sovereignty with the sovereignty you have left.

But you don't take anything for granted.  And you really need to constantly engage in the evaluation of whether your decision-making adheres to your highest ethical and personal standards.

6.  Wouldn't you be able to perceive if you were departing from your previous ethical decision-making?

Answer:  I do think that people can perceive that they are changing in some manner, but mostly they don't understand the cause.  If you know you have suffered from one or more fade deployments, you can be quite rigorous about your self-evaluation.  But it slows everything down, and that alone is an unconscionable impediment to what should be freedom of decision-making.

7.  You have said you would die before you would compromise your ethics.

Answer:  Yes, and that is my own way of dealing with this assault to my sovereignty.  I don't think that many people would feel as strongly as I feel about this matter.  But my whole identity is built on the strength of my character, and I'm not willing to compromise that integrity for anyone under any circumstances.  Life and sovereignty are synonymous to me.  One without the other has no meaning.

8.  To be clear, you are in no way suicidal.

Answer:  No, I'm not.  I'm simply highly watchful and aware given the fade deployments I have suffered, which have not been withdrawn despite my requests.

9.  You are trying to make the point that fades are not political.

Answer:  Yes!  Exactly so.  If we cannot understand this fundamental point, then humanity will devolve into a lesser species.  That's foreseeable from this vantage.  So, we need to ask ourselves whether we are for or against the development of the human race to its fullest potential in the future.  That decision is being made right now, not at some future indeterminate time.

10.  What about people who feel criticized by your writings on this subject?

Answer:  If people feel concerned that they made have made unethical determinations regarding my case, then I think they should be keenly interested in whether they have suffered from fade deployments without their knowledge.  If there have been fade deployments against U.S. leaders or former leaders, then this would present a unique opportunity for them to express what happened from their own perspective in the cause of Americans' sovereignty in the long term.

Again, the stakes are so high in this situation that if we fail to demonstrate courage in speaking about this issue openly, we will fail in the defense of human sovereignty, and fail spectacularly.

The President who brings fades to the American public's awareness will be remembered as a staunch defender of human freedoms.

11.  What if there are restrictions that prevent this disclosure?

Answer:  Then we need to rely on those outside the government to say this is unacceptable.

12.  People like you.

Answer:  People like me.  Yes.  When the Executive Branch, the Congress, the DOJ and the Supreme Court are all being affected by fade deployments that cannot be discussed publicly, we have reached a crisis point in the sovereignty of the nation as a whole.

This is not a crisis that will be solved without investigative hearings, new legislation and continuous monitoring.

But when we say that our most profound problems are too confidential to talk about, we have lost the fight for our freedoms before we've begun.

If we can't name the problem, we can't solve it.

We need to have the courage to talk about this issue.

13.  What are the odds that you could be killed for talking about this issue publicly?

Answer:  Well, they're not zero.  I'm staying at the Marriott Bonvoy Springfield Suites in Flagstaff, Arizona, and my neighbors in Suite #209 seem to be taking an unusual interest in everything I do.

14.  That couldn't be by chance?

Answer:  The FBI says that I'm leading a convoy of travelers who plan to stay wherever I'm staying.  So unnatural interest is noteworthy.

15.  What are the greatest risks in such a circumstance?

Answer:  Dxx deployments and other non-conventional deployments during sleeping hours.

16.  And these could lead to further harm of your dogs or yourself?

Answer:  Easily.

17.  Of what kind?

Answer:  Brain damage, blindness, deafness (I have already lost half my hearing because of the FBI), organ damage, knee damage or damage to other joints (My dog Birdie is already limping with no discernible injury.) Other acute or chronic illnesses.  Stacked fade deployments designed to cause heart attack, stroke or aneurysm. Hotel fire. FBI planted explosive device.  Sniper assault.  It's a long list.

Lately the FBI has also threatened car theft.

18.  Does the FBI have the capability of restoring your hearing?

Answer:  Unknown.

19.  You were asked earlier today what you stand for.  What is the answer?

Answer:  I stand for the Truth.  I stand for the indomitable human spirit.  I stand for relentless courage in the face of long odds.  I stand for the long term human rights of Americans and all those we influence.  I stand for the sovereignty of the United States.  I stand for our deepest, most genuine bonds to one another.  I stand for generosity as an answer to defamation by the FBI.  I stand for good faith as an answer to cynicism. I stand for our ability to surmount extraordinary obstacles.  I stand for our capacity to transcend astonishing wrongs.  I stand for the greatness of human potential.  And I stand for our ability to begin again.

20.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

"The Devil's Backbone": The Problem of Fade Deployment for U.S. Leaders

1.  Someone sent an email to your inbox saying "There will be a President after Donald Trump." What was your response, please?

Answer:  Regardless of one's political views, it doesn't really matter who is President after Donald Trump, because individuals like Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx will control him.  

Every President has sovereignty violations now, which is to say, every President suffers fade deployment, usually more than one.

In the truest sense, we are entering into a stage play of government, a performance of democracy, a parade of puppets.

The succession of leaders is not meaningful in this context.

2.  Did the same thing happen to President Biden?

Answer:  It did, yes.  There were about five minutes when he considered holding a press conference to discuss the problem of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, but Ron Clain allegedly told him it was too big a risk, and that was that.

Later in his Presidency, we saw dramatic erosion of President Biden's ethical conduct, which was less likely a reflection of incipient dementia and more likely the result of fade deployment, although the fade could have caused the dementia as well.

3.  To what extent are other leaders suffering from fade deployments?

Answer: Well, this is the critical question.  To what degree are members of Congress suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent is the Supreme Court suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent are DOJ personnel suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent are our military leaders suffering from fade deployments?  To what extent are FBI and CIA personnel themselves suffering from fade deployments?

The FBI alleges that millions of fades have been deployed within the United States.  Government officials are no doubt a priority for Russian organized crime and Russian oligarchs in this framework, though, alarmingly, fade deployment is occurring with the help of our own citizens.

4.  Is human sovereignty itself a thing of the past?

It will be if we don't find a way to address this parasitic invasion of our most fundamental access to self-determination and identity.

5.  Who knows the most about fades?

The DoD, because DoD personnel are facilitating fade deployment within the United States at this time.

The FBI knows a great deal about fades as well, but the agency will be highly unlikely to reveal to Congress what it knows.

6.  What is the best way to monitor for the effects of fades?

Answer:  It's important for our leaders to continuously ask themselves whether their decisions are consistent with the values they have developed over a lifetime, or whether they mark a departure from their former ethics.

If they are feeling as though their decisions are changing in their character, there is a problem.

And I need to point out that this can be exceptionally difficult to perceive in oneself, so it's valuable to ask others whether they notice significant changes about a given individual when compared to a lifetime of conduct.

7.  What are fades really designed to do?

Answer: They can be considered a brain parasite or brain amoeba.  Fades are designed to invade human consciousness to the point of gaining control over human identity and decision-making.  Once they have fully manifested, so the FBI alleges, the sovereignty of the individual is significantly compromised.

8.  What does it feel like to be the victim of a fade deployment from your own first-hand perspective?

Answer:  It's profoundly difficult, because it becomes necessary to re-evaluate decision-making with a much higher standard of rigor and thoroughness.  Instead of moving forward with daily decisions as normal, I scrutinize important decisions with extreme caution and analysis to make sure they reflect my character and identity in every way, including the highest level of ethics.  So, it slows everything down considerably.

9.  Bxxxxxx Pxxx has allegedly referred to fades as "the devil's backbone."  Do you have a response to this allegation?

Answer:  Fades allegedly have the potential to control certain aspects of human aggression and sexuality, and the risk is that their most fundamental purpose is to lead Americans to turn on one another at a given time.  I can say, having watched my family members suffer from fade deployments, that you don't know what to expect from them -- even after having known and loved these people for decades.  

10.  What about you yourself?  Do you feel that you can rely on yourself to uphold your own standards?

Answer:  I will die before I abandon my ethics and standards.  But I think I'm fairly unusual in this respect.  I have more awareness about the potential effects of fades and I am engaged in extensive monitoring of my decisions and my conduct.  I still have had only one intimate partner over my lifetime, that of my husband of nearly thirty-six years.  

But it is accurate to say that I am appalled by the decision to deploy fades against me as a supporter for the sovereignty of the United States.  This should never have happened, and the fades should be immediately withdrawn.

11.  Should Congress now delve into this matter with the DoD and the FBI?

Answer:  This is an urgent issue, in my opinion, and I believe it should be given pressing priority.  The Congress needs to understand everything they can about the functioning, deployment and effects of fades, while comprehending that their intent is fundamentally counter to human identity, sovereignty and self-determination.

And the Congress should be highly motivated, knowing that they themselves have almost certainly been affected by fade deployments.

12.  What is your view of the appropriate determinations that should be made regarding fade deployments?

Answer:  Withdraw them all, for the love of God.  If we want to have a future in which our freedoms are meaningful, our human development is open to us, our human potential can be fully realized, then fades have to go, never to return.

13.  What about the argument that fades are a viable life form?

Answer:  There are all kinds of deadly parasites that can be considered a viable life form, but they diminish humanity to irreparable degree.  Humanity does not need fades, and neither does the Earth as a whole.  They should be eradicated in their entirety as a matter of national sovereignty.

14.  Will you please continue to illuminate this concern, given that you are on the front lines of this struggle?

Answer:  I will, yes, because I believe this issue to be critical to our future.

15.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Authority: Ongoing Crimes By the FBI

 1,  The FBI has reportedly caused your impending divorce through a myriad of harms to your marriage and family, yet the agency is also depriving you of a lawyer, Linda Anderson, because it appears to be afraid that you might gain genuine legal advocacy regarding your case.  What are your thoughts on this circumstance, please?

Answer:  I find it to be an appalling violation of my human rights, and I refuse to accept it.

2.  What recourse do you have?

Answer:  I'm going on strike.  All my efforts on behalf of the nation as a whole have ended up strengthening the enemies of the United States and those staunchly opposed to long term human sovereignty.  So, this is deeply disappointing, and I simply won't tolerate ongoing violations of my standards.

3.  Is the United States a failed nation because of the way certain elected officials are handling this matter?

Answer:  You know, failed nations embrace knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, propaganda, defamation, human trafficking, drug trafficking, wrongful imprisonment, unjustified torture and first-degree murder against such regimes' detractors.  

So there are enormous warning signs when it comes to my case.

When I checked into a hotel in Sedona, Arizona yesterday afternoon, the FBI appeared to reference a nearby "black site" designed for the torture and killing of the agency's critics.  This is clearly designed to terrorize the agency's betters, and it has no place in our society.

4.  You were feeling extremely nauseous today because of an apparent fade deployment last night -- this, at the same time that you were requesting that all fades be withdrawn immediately.  Would you care to reflect on this situation?

Answer:  Competent leadership is not going to allow sovereignty violations against those advocating for the nation's long term human sovereignty, because the damaging effects on the country as a whole are greatly amplified.

I find the FBI's decision-making to be monstrous, and I reject it out of hand.

It's not just that these FBI personnel are betraying the nation; it's that they are betraying the human race.

5.  Meanwhile, you have had great difficulty obtaining safe food and water, including an incident at a take-out restaurant yesterday.  Can you express what happened?

Answer:  I ordered four chicken sandwiches at a McDonald's in Tucson, and I paid $26.00 for them, after which the restaurant refused to provide me with the food.  I was nearly fainting from hunger, and this restaurant willfully failed to extend the food I had paid for.  My order never appeared on the electronic board as being in progress.  And it seems the FBI thought this was an amusing denial of nourishment.  Ultimately, I needed to walk out, because it was clear I was never going to be served.

6.  What are your thoughts about this experience?

Answer:  Again, it's completely unacceptable to me.  Denying food to a famished person  is not a joke.  It's concentration camp territory, and I find it highly notable that the FBI thinks this is amusing conduct.  The malice of this agency is quite an indictment.

7.  When you stopped to charge your electric vehicle this afternoon, a woman appeared to stalk you and your dogs through the parking lot.  Is that the case?

Answer: Yes, she was mildly harassing us, following us with her car, calling out the window to ask about the dogs.  I face this kind of situation all the time.  Who knows what falsehoods accompanied the antics?  But, depending on the lies, this conduct can be highly endangering.

8.  Her conduct was so unusual that you later photographed her license plate.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  The Arizona plates showed 431 YRK. 

9.  How does it make you feel to be stalked in public in this manner?

Answer:  Deeply saddened for our country.  No worthy nation can be built on lies about the virtuous.

10.  What do you make of allegations that your case is being used as an inflation vector regarding intentional and concealed monetary policy?

Answer:  Again, I think this is cause for grief.  My case should never be used to cause harm to the American public.

11.  And no one has been willing to meet with you to discuss your case and its importance for the human rights of Americans as a whole?

Answer:  No, they have not.  Two senators and a governor asked to meet with me and then cancelled.  But I have spoken to no one about my case.

12.  So, how does it feel to have divorce attorney decline to represent you at the directive of the FBI, when the FBI, through myriad means, has dictated your divorce?

Answer:  Annihilating.  It feels like a prelude to a murder, in which the FBI is focusing on isolating the victim from all known supports.  Institutionally, it fits with the FBI's credo of "disrupt, discredit and divide."  But more than this, it just represents psychopathic predatory behavior, in which the victim is separated from all family and friends prior to first-degree murder.

13.  You don't have any faith in the goodwill of the FBI or its affiliates.

Answer:  Decidedly not.  This agency has deprived me of all of my human rights over a period of years, and the threats are now worse than they have ever been.

14.  Do you give credence to the FBI's threats of abduction and murder?

Answer:  The FBI's affiliates have perpetrated abductions all through Central and South America, so yes, it is reasonable to assume that the horror of abduction will be brought to the United States due to the predations of the FBI as well.

15.  What would happen to the awards extended to you if you suddenly disappeared, were imprisoned, or were murdered by the FBI?

Answer:  Those funds would be misappropriated within a short period of time, and the American public would likely never hear about them.

16.  So, you protest your treatment on every level.

Answer:  Yes, I do.  The fade deployments as fundamental sovereignty violations alone are extremely wrong.  The deprivation of legal counsel is appalling and unacceptable.  The intent to isolate, harm, and profiteer from my case is unconscionable.

All of it represents an astonishing betrayal of good faith, and the fact that my case has become this horrible distortion of justice is something of which the nation's leaders should be ashamed.

17.  Has the government failed to fulfill its most basic responsibilities to you and to the public of the United States?

Answer:  The treatment has been outside of all bounds of human decency, of the requirements of jurisprudence, and of representative government.

18.  The government is still ignoring the requirements of the Supreme Court to provide you with investigative reports concerning your case.

Answer:  Yes.

19.  What are your thoughts about a DOJ that ignores Supreme Court rulings?

Answer:  It's likely that Pam Bondi lost her job over this issue alone, because she likely expressed that, as Attorney General, she was responsible for upholding those rulings.

But when the Supreme Court is ignored, the results for the nation are devastating.  We cannot expect that the long term future of the nation can be protected on any level when the Supreme Court is disrespected and disregarded.

So, we're seeing an abandonment of Constitutional requirements.

20.  You are deeply disappointed.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  It is fair to say.  I need to re-evaluate all aspects of this matter and my participation in advocating for the American people, because my efforts appear to be serving the adversaries of the United States, and not advancing the long term human rights about which I care so deeply.

21.  Will you be writing further about the compromise of your safety through fade deployments?

Answer:  Stacked fade deployments are usually intended to result in heart attack, stroke or aneurysm, but yes, the loss of full sovereignty they result in is by far the worst consequence of the monstrosity that such deployments constitute.  Presuming I don't have a heart attack, stroke or aneurysm, I will be writing much more about this, yes.

22.  You have repeatedly asked for outreach regarding your case, and you have repeatedly been answered with silence, isolation, and violations of your most fundamental freedoms.

Answer:  I have.

23.  Your friends, including your minister, have suffered extreme targeting by the FBI in their own right.

Answer: Yes.

24.  And still, no one has been willing to speak with you regarding these most critical concerns.

Answer:  You know, money is profoundly corrupting, and when money, not people, is the most important priority of government, then we see horrible distortions developing in which the government is profiteering from the torture of the people.

25.  With regard to your properties, has the FBI apologized for its conduct?

Answer:  Not as of this moment, no.  Any forward progress with my properties seems designed to create knowingly false reports and planted evidence, with an apparent intent to lead to arrest and worse.

26.  And, remarkably, you know that names of the individuals most responsible for these schemes?

Answer:  I do know their names, yes.

27.  What is your opinion of these individuals?

Answer:  These people struggle with self-hatred, insecurity, and severe mental illness.  They should not be in charge of a goldfish bowl, much less critical aspects of governance of the United States.

28.  What does it say about the United States when serial killers are permitted to stalk, harass, terrorize and harm the honorable public over a period of long years, without anyone in the government halting the abuse?

Answer: What, indeed?

29.  Will you please continue writing about these issues, given their import for so many?

Answer:  You know, it's all I can now do.  All other recourse has been closed to me.  My only option is to write publicly about the FBI's predations in the hope that this information will be preserved and made accessible by historical examination of this period of time.

30.  Can history hold the worst of the FBI's perpetrators accountable?

Answer:  It can and it must.

31.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

We Need to Talk About Ben Sasse

 1.  Ben Sasse, a former Republican senator, was recently interviewed in the New York Times regarding his terminal cancer diagnosis.  But, on reading the interview, you found some concerning details that, in your view, require broader attention.  Could you expound on those specifics, please?

Answer:  First of all, I would like to express my concern for Ben Sasse and his family at this time.  This is a person who has dedicated his life to the service of others and someone who has engaged with public life with a rare compass of ethics and integrity.

2.  But you find some of the details of his illness to be unusual.

Answer:  I do, and I think Congress will find them unusual as well.

3.  What are those details, please?

Answer:  Ben Sasse was diagnosed simultaneously with pancreatic cancer, lymphoma, liver cancer, lung cancer, cancer of the blood vessels and more.  This is an unlikely presentation when it comes to terminal cancer diagnosis, and it generally represents a deadly exposure to radiation or a powerful chemical carcinogen.  We just don't normally see people being diagnosed with unrelated cancers simultaneously.  When we do see it, there is a reason.  This is not merely "the luck of the draw" or compromised genetics.  There is likely to have been significant harm to the environment of the patient, and an inquiry into this matter should be undertaken by the Congress as a whole, in a bipartisan way, because this particular instance is so grievous.

4.  What should Congress do as a start to assess what has happened in this situation?

Answer:  Congress should pull Ben Sasse's FBI file immediately.

5.  How do you know that former Senator Ben Sasse has an FBI file?

Answer:  Everyone has an FBI file.  All Americans.  Even minors.  This is what I have been trying to convey through my discussions on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates.  If you think you're the exception, you're wrong.  If you think your spouse is the exception, you're wrong again.  If you think your children are the exception, you're wrong three times over.

6.  Do you have any idea what former Senator Ben Sasse's FBI file might contain?

Answer:  The FBI labels every American of faith as a religious extremist, so I can guarantee that much is there.  So the honorable former Senator would certainly have been mischaracterized as a "dangerous person" on this basis alone.

Having said that, there is likely to be a great deal of unrelated falsified law enforcement reporting as well.

7.  Why do you say that?

Answer:  The FBI likes to throw the whole kitchen sink of false accusations into the files.  Espionage, Terrorism, Child abuse. Capital crimes.  On the chance that any single accusation is later disproved, the agency can still claim that the "target of interest" was engaged in criminal conduct.

8.  Why is former Senator Ben Sasse's case particularly important to the nation as a whole?

Answer:  Because we want our elected officials to be able to speak freely about their opinions, their beliefs, their advocacy for their constituents, and their concerns for our nation as a whole.  If we have reached the point at which honesty and integrity in the public sphere are answered with a concealed death sentence, extended through a hidden adjudication, then we have lost our Constitutional governance and all the critical guarantees that go along with it.

Public service cannot become the arena of personal grievance, political vengeance, and targeted harm.  We need to rely on the ability of Congress, in a bipartisan way, to ensure that our elected officials, our former elected officials, and others who are advocating for the nation, are not incapacitated in retaliation for a perceived slight or a killed out of a desire to profiteer.  This is unacceptable conduct for any civilized nation, and we need together to reject it outright.

Beyond this, I would point out that Americans of faith are not radicals, extremists, or terrorists, and the FBI needs to stop mischaracterizing them in these ways.  The separation of Church and State means that no government body or agency should be targeting Americans for the manifestation of their religious or spiritual beliefs.

And that includes the FBI.

9.  What should Congress do if indeed it is found that Ben Sasse's FBI file is filled with disinformation?

Answer:  After that, Congress should inquire about any and all concealed judgments against him on the basis of this knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  

Following this, members of the House and Senate should obtain all information about the means by which the FBI may have directed specific harms toward Ben Sasse and toward his family members.

10.  Is there a responsibility on the part of Congress to ensure that Ben Sasse receives the best possible care at this time?

Answer:  Congress needs to evaluate this matter behind closed doors.  I would certainly hope that Ben Sasse's care would be prioritized under these circumstances.

Republicans and Democrats alike need to know that they are empowered to speak their minds, to help their constituents, to uphold long term human rights for Americans, and to lead with honesty, integrity, courage, and fortitude.

That means we're going to need certain changes within the FBI, because no Congressperson or former Congressperson should be suffering due to their public service.  Our nation is immeasurably weakened whenever this happens.

11.  Do you think both Democrats and Republicans can join together to address this particular issue?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Everyone needs to express that, as our elected leaders, they are collectively insisting that their ability to exercise their Constitutional freedoms in defense of the national interest must be protected.

And the same holds true for our military leaders and retired military leaders.  We don't want to see those who demonstrate the power of extraordinary character and integrity being targeted in any manner whatsoever by the FBI or any of its affiliates.  We need our military to be able to hold the line in certain critical aspects of the nation's future.  That means our leaders within the Congress and the military both need to reject the targeting of those who are serving or have served Americans' sovereignty and security.

12.  When should this concern be taken up by a busy and overburdened Congress?

Answer:  How soon is now?  This is an urgent matter for all of our leaders, and it needs to be addressed immediately.  Any time we have a problem with the architecture of our government, the issue needs to rise to the top of our priorities.

13.  Will we be reading about this issue in the newspapers?

Answer:  No, I expect that Congress will address it confidentially.  But Congress, the Supreme Court and the DOJ have a critical role in ensuring that there are laws in place that protect civilian and military leaders who are advocating -- or, as in the case of former Senator Ben Sasse -- who have advocated in the past -- for the welfare of the American public and their long term human rights.

14.  You have documented recently that the FBI seems to be expressing profound antipathy to American churches and houses of worship.

Answer:  Yes, and that antipathy plays a role in this particular instance, I have no doubt.  But Americans of faith are not insane, dangerous, delusional, or radicalized.  And as Americans, we have the right to worship as we choose, with all the Constitutional freedoms that are afforded to us.  Now is not the time to be relinquishing that right.  Our nation is much weaker if we are disallowed from exercising religious freedom.  Spiritual inquiry should not translate to an indictment.  And this needs to be made much clearer to the FBI.

15.  Is there anything you would like to add?

Answer:  Totalitarianism can often arrive with technological advances that outpace our moral and spiritual development.  Knowledge without commensurate wisdom and benevolence represents a tremendous risk for human society, and, indeed, for the world as a whole.

Right now, the FBI is wielding highly advanced tools without the insight, wisdom, and restraint that we require.  And, in the realm of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, AI is increasingly being harnessed to the aggregation of disinformation about Americans and to the unseen consequences of that aggregation.

We don't currently have meaningful plans in place to deconstruct the architecture of that false reporting.  These files of disinformation represent Americans' permanent records.  And they may not be public, but they are determinative.

So, this represents a governmental crisis, and not only for the United States, but for other nations as well.

16.  Can we change our current course?

Answer:  We need to engage at every inflection point available to us.  But yes, if I didn't think we could rescue human sovereignty for Americans, and by extension all those we influence, I wouldn't be striving for our future in this manner.

17.  What do we need to be focusing on most?

Answer:  Right now, let's focus on the good Senator Ben Sasse, and, regardless of our political views, let's see what a Congressional investigation into this matter will illuminate.

18.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline, on April 10. 11,12, 13 and 14,, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to the attention of your Office on April 10, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Signing of Listing Agreement, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:38 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Code Red Allegation, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:39 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Best Western Dos Rios Management and Best Western Management, sent at 10:39 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Austin Airport Hilton Management, sent at 9:56 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Communication to Task Rabbit Support Team, sent at 9:42 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 8:51 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Stranded Due to Apparent EV Tampering, sent at 4:33 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 10, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:38 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 11:15 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: We Need to Talk About Ben Sasse, sent at 8:33 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Document shared with you..., sent at 1:03 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Strengthening Words for My Beloved Young Man, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:21 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 9, 2026, sent at 12:03 AM Central time.

April 11, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 9:00 AM Central time.
• The Need for Heightened Caution, sent at 8:56 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Code Red Allegation, sent at 5:18 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Apparent Vehicle Charging Obstruction, sent at 4:27 AM Central time.

April 12, 2026:

• Notes to Myself, sent at 10:39 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Signing of L...., sent at 5:16 PM Pacific time  (signature postponed while FedEx sent).
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 3:54 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Electrify America Management, sent at 10:39 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 12, 2026, sent at 8:41 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 7:15 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Please Do Not Commence Work Until I Hear from My Insurance... sent at 7:12 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Photos Fwd: ATTN: Atrium Inn's Management, sent at 7:00 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Atrium Inn's Management, sent at 3:08 AM Pacific time.

April 13, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: 2025 Chase Bank 2124 Records, sent at 1:16 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys,please respond as soon as you can, sent at 1:09 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: 2025 Accounting Information for 40 Gansett, sent at 1:03 PM Pacific time. (in addition to 12:05 AM Pacific time on April 14, 2026)
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Tucson Airport Hilton Front Desk, sent at 6:25 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Notes to Myself Re: A Few Words About ActBlue, sent at 5:39 AM Pacific time.

April 14, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Raising the Red Flag, sent at 6:55 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: I will call you tomorrow, sent at 12:09 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx, Confidential, sent at 12:15 AM Pacific time.
• List, Confidential, sent at 12:15 AM Pacific time.

Emails Sent to the OIG Hotline on April 7, 8, and 9, 2026

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your Office today, April 7, 2026.

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Taskrabbit in Austin, TX, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 10:58 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 2:53 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: A Call for Clear, Consistent, and Sustained Change, sent at 2:42 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 2:26 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 7, 2026, sent at 5:53 AM Central time.

April 8:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, 7:32 PM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information, sent at 5:07 PM Central time.

April 9:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 9:46 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Information,  sent at 9:05 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Traveling Once More, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:53 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Engagement Letter; Draft Letter, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:44 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: FK Consultation Information, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:41 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Amazon Package Delivery, sent at 8:02 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Real Estate Attorney Referrals, Etc., Pertaining to... , sent at 8:00 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd:  Referral from Kxxxxxxx Lxxxxx, sent at 7:58 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Policy #1509219 Coverage of Attorney Needed Due to Third Party Malfeasance,  sent at 7:56 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Additional Tax Documentation for 2025 and 2026, sent at 7:55 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Case Number 21030976 Pick Up of MB EQS 450,  sent at 7:54 AM Central time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Document shared with you: "45 Vista Verde Marketing", sent at 7:49 AM Central time.