What Were Tom Lyons' Crimes Against the Property of a Human Rights Advocate?

 1.  Let's turn to the subject of the crimes Tom Lyons directed toward your property on Cape Cod, please.

Answer:  Please go ahead.

2.  What information did the FBI provide to you regarding this issue?

Answer:  The FBI appeared to send me a lot of material about a "house of horrors," a house in which the deceased were concealed or buried, a house in which capital crimes had taken place, in addition to a lot of suggestions of "framing," corrupt law enforcement, falsified law enforcement reporting, manipulation of DNA evidence, and concealed court proceedings.

3.  Over how long a period of time were you receiving these apparent allegations?

Answer:  For years, it seemed to me.  I found all of these allegations to be deeply upsetting, and I reported them regularly to the OIG Hotline for documentation purposes.

4.  One winter several years ago, you traveled to your family home on Cape Cod in order to check on the property.  Is that correct?

Answer:  I have a fiduciary duty to manage the property, despite the extraordinary obstacles created by the FBI.  So I traveled to Cape Cod in January of 2025 to assess the observable condition of the house and land.

5.  What did you find?

Answer:  It was quite cold, because the heat was turned off for the winter at that time, but I was alarmed upon entering the house.

6.  May I ask why?

Answer:  I remember that I reported to the OIG Hotline that the house smelled like a morgue.  And I have never been in a morgue.  But, on crossing the threshold, there was an immediate revulsion and nausea.  This is an instinctive response -- not a learned one.  I felt that there was something very, very wrong, and I immediately reached out the OIG Hotline about my impressions, requesting an investigation.

7.  Did you also request information from the local police department and the local District Attorney?

Answer:  Several times, yes.

8.  And were you provided with any material regarding your home or your family?

Answer:  No, I received nothing.  At one point, I brought a dozen donuts to the Falmouth Police Department, together with my written request for information, and several officers appeared to be hiding in a darkened office behind the reception area. It seemed like exceptionally strange behavior from my point of view.

But I was denied all access to any information regarding my property, my family members or myself.

9. Did you make yourself available for a dialogue with law enforcement?

Answer:  Absolutely, yes.  I would have loved to have spoken with them directly about my concerns.

Later that winter, I traveled to Washington, D.C. to make myself available to the DOJ for direct meetings regarding my case, including my concerns about my home on Cape Cod.  In addition, I wanted to ensure that a conveyance of case material could be rendered unobstructed by my presence within Washington, D.C.

10. What happened?

Answer:  Nothing.  I received no response.

I did have my life directly threatened by two men on the seventh floor of the Hilton on Connecticut Avenue.

And I was drugged by contaminated food that was served to me at the Hamilton restaurant in D.C.

So, I came away with the impression that Washington, D.C. was an exceptionally dangerous place for good people.

The town seemed to be crawling with corrupt intelligence personnel.  

And I received no honest engagement whatsoever.

11.  What were your impressions based on your outreach to all offices involved?

Answer:  I don't want to leave out that I also asked for direct communication from the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, and was met with silence there, as well.

What were my impressions?  My impressions were and are that falsified law enforcement reporting is a big, big racket within the United States at this time.  I feel that all of these officials knew perfectly well that there had been FBI malfeasance at my property, perhaps both  of my properties, and they were dodging any direct dialogue with me that would render them accountable to disclose these crimes on the part of the FBI and its affiliates.

Meanwhile, my life was under threat the entire time.

Honestly, I look back at my communications to all of these offices, at my travel that was intended to make decisive progress regarding my case, at my striving on every front -- and I think "That woman has astonishing courage!"

Truly, the record of my efforts is rather superhuman.

12.  Given your superhuman efforts, what do you think of the allegation that the issue of the crimes Tom Lyons directed against your properties is only now being adjudicated for the first time?

Answer:  Well, it shows you how dangerous the situation has become for the honorable public.  Have I been asked to give testimony regarding any of these events?  No.  Not one gesture of outreach.

Meanwhile, I am supposedly on trial for my life for crimes for which Tom Lyons, Brandan Pesa and their FBI cohort are entirely responsible.

13.  Do Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa have immunity from criminal prosecution regarding the crimes they directed?

Answer:  I think it's clear that they exceeded the boundaries of that legal immunity.

Do they have a degree of immunity from prosecution?  Yes.

But these abuses are so extraordinary that I think it's possible that immunity could be invalidated.

14.  Why are you so determined to speak publicly about this matter at this time?

Answer:  Because these men are still allegedly lying about my honor and lawfulness in a court setting in which I have no opportunity for rebuttal.  

To write about the conduct of these men, by name, on a daily basis, is the only way in which I can defend my virtue and my integrity.

15.  Will you continue to do so until your requirements for resolution of this matter are met to your standards and satisfaction?

Answer:  Yes, I will.

16.  What about the argument that these men would prefer not to be publicly exposed?

Answer:  And I would prefer not to be falsely accused of crimes of which I have no knowledge whatsoever.

Mine is the greater need.

17.  How do you respond to allegations that Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa, after having wrongfully conscripted your younger son into the Pxxxxxx Program, criminally directed him to perpetrate acts which were intended from the very beginning to frame you of serious crimes?

Answer:  I know my sons, both of them, exceptionally well.  I raised them myself with infinite honor, respect, love, faith, wisdom, engagement, and kindness.  And I know they both would have died before harming another person prior to being tortured by the FBI and its affiliates.  

The FBI assailed both of them with repeated sovereignty violations in the form of fade deployments in addition to torture, and the annihilation of personal boundaries that can result from such aggression needs to be fully understood if human sovereignty is to endure in any meaningful form whatsoever.

Do I believe that Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa directed a long series of criminal acts in a long term plan to destroy my entire family?  Absolutely.  That much is patently clear.  And we also need to understand that they intended to profiteer from that criminal sequence.

18.  What should happen to Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa at this juncture?

Answer:  A lot of the problems we face in failed societies is the result of a lack of accountability.  So the first requirement is for Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa to acknowledge their crimes to a court of law.

While I have been deprived of direct legal representation in every setting, these men have armies of lawyers at their disposal.

They should avail themselves of this advocacy and they should admit their crimes against my family.

At least that would give us a starting point for dialogue through an intermediary, which obviously needs to occur.

19.  What should happen to the funds these men have misappropriated from your account over time?

Answer:  All of it should be re-appropriated from these men's assets and returned to my account and then some.  These men should literally be in debt to me for the rest of their lives, which I hope are long, so they can think about what they've done.

There are laws which disallow profiteering by predators.  They need to be enforced in this case.

20.  What about the additional civil liability these men have incurred to you?  And what about the additional civil liability of the FBI and its affiliate agencies, which assisted these men in their criminal acts?

Answer:  This needs to be carefully assessed, certainly, and I need to be directly involved in those discussions, because there are many components of that liability which are not delineated here.

But it is fair to say that the prolonged malice and predation involved in these events is extraordinarily severe, cruel, and malevolent.  And I think that the civil liabilities incurred with regard to the FBI's crimes against my properties, and the crimes against my family pertaining to this particular scheme, should dwarf many other aspects of this case in terms of liability.

21.  Once a liability is awarded to you, should the FBI and its affiliates be able to come along later and misappropriate those funds?

Answer:  Never.  It should never happen.  The FBI and its affiliates are opposed to human sovereignty and the sovereignty of the United States as a whole.  No one should be able to come along after the fact and demand payment from awards of which I have not been formally informed.

I cannot take my dogs for a walk without the FBI's wrongfully claiming that they harmed someone or threatened someone.

So, this graft needs to stop and the DOJ needs to insist that it stop.

Awards extended to me should not be available for anybody to co-opt later on.

Awards should be formally conveyed to me and then I should be allowed to designate funds for critical support of the sovereignty of the United States and our people.  No one should be standing in the way of that.

22.  The funds these men have misappropriated have rendered them substantially more powerful than they were at the outset of this case, haven't they?

Answer:  Unquestionably so, and that's why these men's crimes now need to ensure their impoverishment.  If Americans' future sovereignty is going to have a chance, then opponents of the independence of the United States must not become wealthy nation-states unto themselves.

23.  It is reported that Tom Lyons has tried to weasel his way out of accountability for his crimes in this matter by wrongfully alleging that your parents were violent criminals.  How do you feel about that attempt?

Answer:  As George Orwell said, "Who controls the past controls the future."  When we abandon the truth of our honorable and virtuous parents, we abandon all hope for a worthy future as well.

History cannot be a creative writing exercise for criminals evading accountability.

We are required to face the past honorably and truthfully if we hope that our worthy national character will be preserved through time.

Tom Lyons needs to be sharply rebuked for all of these attempts, and so does the FBI as a whole.

24.  Will the Smithsonian Institution one day provide all of your writings for the American public to assess independent of governmental restrictions and censorship?

Answer:  In the absence of my actively and directly curating that material, I certainly hope so.

25.  Will you continue to speak about these issues for the time being?

Answer:  I will continue to speak about these concerns until and unless I receive satisfactory resolution of this case to date to my standards and satisfaction, yes.

26.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

When Predators Toward the Nation Are Unmasked

 1.  Your navigation systems continue to divert you to unwanted routes and destinations, whether through Google Maps or your MB navigation system.  Is that correct?

Answer:  This does continue to occur, yes.  I recently asked my MB navigator to route me to the closest Home Depot, and a voice stated that I would be traveling on dirt roads into a restricted area.  

I immediately used my iPhone's Google Maps and was routed via major roads to a nearby Home Depot with no difficulty.

Yesterday, I was routed home to my apartment from the Coconino Superior Court via a very circuitous route through Google Maps.

So, all of these incidents represent substantive risks.

2.  Risks of what, primarily?

Answer:  Kidnapping, sniper assaults, staged car accidents, false reporting, falsified communications, on and on.

My VPN on both my computer and my cell phone is often disabled by a third party, thus facilitating piggybacking on my IP address.  So, this is quite dangerous all by itself.

3.  The FBI appears to be warning you to leave Aura Apartments at this time.  Do you have any idea why?

Answer:  A FedEx delivery to me appears to have been stolen from the mail room yesterday, if FedEx's documentation is to be believed.

And my dogs appear to have been poisoned yesterday, through means unknown to me.

In addition, the FBI seems to allege that Tom Lyons is still persisting in his lies regarding his crimes connected to my properties.  So, he may be planning to plant false evidence of parallel crimes at my apartment.

This morning, I raised the window shade to find that a clear handprint had been placed on the inside of the window glass.

4.  You had not placed the handprint there?

Answer:  Absolutely not.

5.  What other FBI threats are you facing currently?

Answer:  The FBI appears to have deleted my passport information from my court filing yesterday in Coconino County, Arizona.  So, that needs to be corrected.

And yesterday evening, corresponding to unusual threats of "mauling," I was stalked at Ponderosa Trails Park by a man with a German Shepherd.

I have been warned not to use my furnace at my apartment, nor the bathroom fan.

And threats of DEW deployment appear to be ongoing.

6.  Have you received any information from the Arizona Attorney General's Office other than an initial email confirming receipt of your Arizona Public Information Act request?

Answer:  No, I have not yet received any further communication.

7.  Is it possible that the missing FedEx package originated with their Office?

Answer:  Of course, yes, this is possible.

8. Would you hope that any missing mailing would be immediately replaced?

Answer:  Most decidedly, yes.

9.  Do you anticipate that Tom Lyons will stop extending disinformation about your family and your properties?

Answer:  No, I don't think Tom Lyons has left himself an out with regard to this particular scheme on his part.  I think his career will be finished if he acknowledges what he did, and I think his freedom will be imperiled as well.

10.  What alternative does the FBI have?

Answer:  The financial penalty to Tom Lyons for his crimes against my properties, and related crimes against my family, should total more than his misappropriations over the entire course of this case.  In other words, the man needs to be in serious debt to me in perpetuity, because this represents the unconscionable malice he expressed toward my family over time, with careful and meticulous planning.

11.  Tom Lyons should be impoverished in a civil context if he cannot be imprisoned in a criminal context.

Answer:  Both would be most appropriate, but yes.

12.  You still need investigative reports in order to assess even a portion of Tom Lyons' crimes against your family.  Isn't that so?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

13.  What can be done to ensure that Tom Lyons is now stopped in his predatory false reporting against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  I will be writing about him daily until this matter is resolved to my standards and my satisfaction.

14.  What about the fact that Tom Lyons and the FBI are, in many respects, responsible for holding your children hostage to their demands for false witness statements about your family?

Answer:  The FBI is holding my children hostage in many regards, not regarding false witness statements alone.  And they are also threatening my other family members with job loss and physical harm if they don't comply with wrongful directives.

15.  What is your recourse?

Answer:  Again, I will be making sure that Tom Lyons and his close friends leave an infamous legacy for the American people to contemplate when regarding the facts of this individual's conduct against my family, and in a larger context, his treasonous conduct toward the United States as well.

And I will be doing that by writing about these individuals' actions daily until and unless I receive acknowledgement of Tom Lyons' lies and predatory acts.

16.  These individuals apparently dislike being exposed to public censure.

Answer:  They should have thought of that before they assailed my family and myself.

And I would like to make clear that I am not referring to those who have suffered sovereignty violations regarding this case.

Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa suffered no fade deployments.  They were directing the fade deployments against others in the exercise of their free will and independent decision-making.

17.  These FBI personnel keep suggesting your "retirement."

Answer:  That's not going to happen until and unless my standards are met regarding the resolution of this matter.

Usually, when the FBI suggests a person's "retirement," that is a euphemism for the agency's murder of the individual, in any case.

If Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa don't want to be further exposed publicly, they need to facilitate the provision to me of investigative reports regarding my case, along with outreach from an honorable -- that means non-violent, for those who don't know any better -- intermediary.

18.  What is your understanding of the crimes Tom Lyons directed regarding your properties?

Answer:  I only know what the FBI has appeared to disclose, together with my own observations when I visited my Cape Cod property in the winter several years ago.

19.  Are you able to disclose the FBI's allegations about Tom Lyons' crimes?

Answer:  That will require a dedicated conversation, but yes, I think the time has come for the FBI's allegations of Tom Lyons' crimes to be rendered public.

20.  In the meantime, will you keep in close contact with us, given the FBI's apparent allegation that you are now "dueling" with Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa, two of the most dangerous criminals affiliated with the United States intelligence agencies?

Answer:  The analogy of a "duel" seems patently unfair, because these two men are attacking my character and that of my family behind the scenes.  Liars never have the courage to stand in the open, because they know they will be unmasked there.

But yes, of course, I will remain in close contact.

21.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to your attention.  Please note that this list is not complete:

May 4, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Missing FedEx Package, sent at 10:22 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Expanded Background Information, sent at 1:27 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Court Filing, May 4, 2026, sent at 6:12 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:44 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as you can, sent at 11:42 AM Pacific time.

May 3, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:25 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Re: May 2, 2026, sent at 12:31 AM Pacific time.

May 2, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: My Lawful Right to Vote, sent at 5:15 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Confirmation of Lease Correction..., sent at 5:06 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Carol Elaine Von Herzen..., sent at 4:27 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Documentation Pertaining to Identification, sent at 1:59 PM Pacific time.

May 1, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: No Utility Charges..., sent at 10:25 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Pacific Gas and Electric..., sent at 10:03 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 2:26 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Current FBI Threats, sent at 1:59 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Ticket Assistance, sent at 1:03 PM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: GTM Texts, sent at 11:22 AM Pacific time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: By Living and Helping Others to Live, sent at 12:41 AM Pacific time.

April 30, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, April 30, 2026, sent at 11:51 PM Pacific time.

Coconino Superior Court Filing, May 4, 2026

OIG Hotline, I would redact proper names below, except for the fact that it is possible that I am still being accused by the FBI and its affiliates of malfeasance of which I have no knowledge.  Under such circumstances, and without investigative reports or contact from an honorable intermediary, the risks are simply too great for me to remain silent about the identities of the individuals who have committed the most egregious wrongs concerning this case.

If immediate and honorable outreach occurs, and if my court filing is respectfully and appropriately handled, then and only then, my filings can be removed from my blog, not before.

Accompanying my petition was a copy of my lease, my diriver's license, my social security card, my birth certificate, my marriage certificate, documentation from my husband, and limited real estate POA's, along with general background concerning my parents, children, husband, birth place, birth date, known assets, etc.  The inclusion of my passport appears to have been wrongfully obstructed, so I will need to add it to my petition as soon as possible.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

 May 4, 2026

To the Honorable Judge assigned to preside over my request to change my name from Carol Elaine Von Herzen to Lane MacWilliams:

I am a current resident of Coconino County, Arizona, as you see from my materials included herewith.

It is important that you know that I am a human rights advocate in a federal case pertaining to the FBI’s commission of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public.  This case has been, and continues to be, adjudicated before the Supreme Court with the support of the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice.

I have assiduously and continuously sought complete documentation of corrupt law enforcement’s perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting through Freedom of Information Act requests and state public information act requests, and have been provided with some interesting proofs of this apparently wide-scale problem.

Through a provision of documents required of the FBI from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence several years ago, I learned that a corrupt local Sheriff’s Deputy, Rick Chaput, in San Mateo County, California, where I lived at the time, took a stalking report from my husband and myself only to proceed to refer me – unbeknownst to me or any of my family members – to “Adult Protective Services,” apparently with the intention of justifying extensive and ongoing surveillance of my entire family and myself.

Later, when I spoke to an employee of a women’s shelter in Sacramento in the course of my research on this issue, she disclosed to me that many women in California were denied requests for information about stalking complaints through the Freedom of Information Act and the California Public Records Act.

In other words, it appeared that there was a pattern of local law enforcement within California withholding public information requested by stalking victims – and whether these women were suffering stalking from law enforcement affiliates is unclear – and further, in speaking to women’s shelter staffing, it appeared that many of these women believed that they were being improperly surveilled as part of this problem.

Were many of them being referred to Adult Protective Services with false statements from law enforcement questioning their mental health, as apparently had occurred in my case?

This appears to be a distinct possibility, given that the vast majority of my requests for information through the Freedom of Information Act, as well as an international background check I ran (at a cost of several thousand dollars), including a fingerprint scan, addressing any and all records within the United States and other countries to which I had traveled (Canada, France, Portugal, Zimbabwe, and Zaire) were returned to me as blank.

As part of this quest, I should disclose that several years ago, a corrupt FBI official named Tom Lyons apparently tried to force me to sell my family home on Cape Cod. Allegedly the FBI skims several percentage points off the realtors’ commissions in forced sales of the properties of “targets of interest,” and this scheme is treated as a kind of “profit-sharing” sideline within the agency.

If I refused to sell, Tom Lyons appeared to threaten to drive the value of my home to zero through undisclosed means.  (It was unclear whether my main residence in San Mateo County, California was also included in this apparent threat.)

I did refuse to sell, and, subsequently, appeared to receive threats that my family home on Cape Cod had been treated as a staged crime scene of some kind by the FBI, with Tom Lyons leading all crimes related to this conduct.  Falsified DNA evidence was reported to be part of this staging, though I have received no verified communication regarding this issue.

I have received myriad apparent threats regarding the matter of the saleability of both of my homes due to reported predatory acts directed by Tom Lyons, along with his reported close affiliate in Russian organized crime, a man named Brandan Pesa.

And, as it happens, my husband now wishes to sell our Portola Valley (San Mateo County, CA) home and to assist with the sale of my family’s Cape Cod property at this time. (My own personal view is that the attempt to list and sell one or both of our properties should force the hand of the FBI to reveal any and all false accusations regarding these homes and their affiliated land.  So, I am now in favor of this development.  Please note that, as Tom Lyons appears to have been recently cornered on this issue, he is alleged to be casting false blame for serious crimes upon my virtuous and honorable parents, now deceased, Janice Elaine Von Herzen and Richard Pierre Von Herzen.  They are not here to defend themselves, so I continue to defend their laudable character and integrity throughout their lifetimes.)

At this point, I have taken on the role of advocating for the long term human rights of all Americans, because it has been alleged that the U.S. DOJ has extended very large sums as awards against FBI malfeasance in my case.

The problem seems to be that false accusations are regularly filed against me in a concealed manner, and misappropriations are regularly drawn from accounts in my name, thus perpetuating a process of significant graft by certain top government officials.  

For the record, I have difficulty taking my dogs for a walk without being besieged by “witnesses” who are alleged to later file false claims about the lawfulness of my communications, my cell phone screen, whether my dogs are aggressive (definitely not), and more.

Often, false reports are alleged to pertain to the well-worn misogynistic tropes of mental instability and promiscuity.  (Female targets of interest are alleged to be delusional, lacking the capacity for self-care, a danger to the public, and voraciously sexualized and predatory toward others, including minors.)

For your own knowledge, I do not suffer and have never suffered from mental illness. I happen to have had only one intimate partner over my lifetime, that of my husband of thirty-five years.  I own no weapons, although I do use kitchen utensils while cooking in the kitchen.  I have threatened no one and I never will threaten anyone.  I am protective toward others, both vulnerable and hearty members of the public, respecting others’ human rights at all times and in all settings.  And I am an entirely peaceable, honorable, and law-abiding person.

I am undertaking this request for a name change because it has been alleged that the current Executive Branch intends to direct the misappropriation of all awards in this case through the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice on the basis of the discrepancy between my birth certificate, which reads Carol Elaine Von Herzen, and my current identification (driver’s license, passport, social security card, etc.) which reads Lane MacWilliams.

So, I would like to have a court order that renders my name, Lane MacWilliams, official, in order to protect my human rights advocacy and the support for the American public that I intend to continue to render.

As part of this name change application, there is a question about whether I have ever been accused of a felony or convicted of a felony.  I have no proof that either has occurred, but I suspect that my case at the federal level has been exploited for the profiteering of top elected officials for a prolonged period of time, to include knowingly false accusations followed by presumed exoneration on an ongoing basis.

For your additional information, my husband is alleged by the FBI to have been falsely accused of “espionage” activity, and my sons are alleged to have been forcibly recruited into a corrupt government program, which I will redact here as the Pxxxxxx Program, involving intentional harm toward the public, directed by federal agencies.  My older son appears to be falsely reported upon in the categories of “illegal weapons trafficking” and “terrorism.” And my younger son appears to be falsely reported upon in the categories of “drug trafficking,” “failing to register as a foreign agent,” and other crimes.  Both of them have reportedly suffered human trafficking by their respective agencies (the FBI in the case of my younger son and an affiliate agency in the case of my older son), shock treatment, near-drowning, food and water deprivation, sovereignty violations, directives to cause harm to others,  and other injuries in the demand for knowingly falsified witness statements about our family.

Unfortunately, the FBI’s abuse of our family members, colleagues and friends does not appear to stop with my sons, but allegedly extends to my daughter in law, my brother, my uncle, my aunt, my ministers, and many other family members, friends, colleagues and associates – all in the quest for knowingly false witness statements which are intended to bolster false FBI claims, apparently originating with Tom Lyons and his close affiliate Brandan Pesa.

However, I would like to point out that false reporting about the American public appears to represent widespread policy for the FBI, and my case – while uniquely egregious in its abuses by the agency – is part of an apparent larger effort by the FBI to create a dossier of false reporting which wrongfully implicates every American citizen, including minors, of wrongdoing that could serve to justify their harm.

The FBI often likes to state that it needs falsified law enforcement reporting because of the pressures of global concerns relating to a climate crisis which is much more severe than has been acknowledged by public officials.

But my contention is that the FBI wants falsified law enforcement reporting in order to exert control over the financial, social, professional, educational, and medical spheres of the American public’s personal lives.  The agency does not need it to fulfill its mission and objectives.

And further, there is no plan to sunset programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  These false dossiers, increasingly AI-generated, will be created, aggregated, and disseminated in perpetuity unless insightful and insistent advocates such as myself object at this juncture with clarity, principle and determination on behalf of the nation as a whole.

The American people cannot defend themselves against lies they cannot examine.

Therefore, I respectfully request that you communicate with the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice regarding my name change request.

You will certainly receive extensive communication from the FBI, regardless.

At issue is whether or not the FBI’s false reporting will be loaded into the publicly accessible court records associated with my name change request, information which I have been repeatedly denied despite my assiduous efforts to obtain it.

What are my thoughts about this juncture?

I would ask that the Honorable Judge involved in this case speak with me directly about the alternatives.

I am not hiring an attorney to handle this matter, because the FBI has used attorneys in the past to communicate misleading counsel.  So, I would rather that this issue be handled more directly.

Do I wish to be defamed by the FBI by AI-generated films, photos, false witness statements and wrongful accusations in the public record when I have been deprived of all of this information through my lawful requests?

No one would want such an outcome.

Having said that, if this is the only way to force the FBI to disclose the problem of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the honorable American public, it might be a viable tool for change in the course of my advocacy.

Your Honor should know that I currently have an Arizona Public Records Act request with the Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes’ Office, with documentation pending.

Attorney General Mayes will come under extraordinary pressure as part of this request, as will, regrettably, you yourself.

My recommendation for mitigating that pressure is to move quickly and decisively, and to involve me in the decision-making.

The longer an individual waits regarding a critical matter pertaining to knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI, the greater the opportunity for the FBI to threaten and bribe family members, friends, and associates.

So, delay is the enemy for good people combating false reporting by the FBI.

And communication with the investigators of integrity within the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice (oig.hotline@usdoj.gov)  is key. (Please note that the Hotline is distinct from the standard OIG of the U.S. DOJ.)

Thank you for allowing me to provide this background, your Honor, and I look forward to the opportunity to speak with you about this circumstance, if you feel that is most appropriate.

Respectfully,

Lane MacWilliams

Calling Out Executive Conflict of Interest

Duncan Sayer MacWilliams, my beloved son,

It is understood through the highest level of legal precedent throughout the nation, and internationally, that victims of torture cannot provide credible witness statements to their tormentors.

The fact that this administration continues to direct you unlawfully to provide knowingly false information about our family members represents an appalling and egregious wrong -- and one that cannot go unanswered.

The rumor that you and Mary are currently residing in a property in New York City which is owned by the highest elected official in our nation brings into focus an astonishing conflict of interest.

At issue is whether the Executive Branch has dispensation to hold you and Mary as virtual hostages to the falsified law enforcement reporting against which I have worked for the last eight years running.

Does the President have the right to order that you be subjected to shock treatment, near-drowning, beatings, human trafficking, wrongful orders, continuous threat of untreated illness, arrest, death and more in his quest for funds awarded in my case, funds which he can misappropriate if you falsely attest to the character and conduct of our family members?

No, my beloved child.  He does not.

And I will speak to President Trump directly about this matter if I am asked to do so honorably.

The President has crossed a line with regard to his treatment of our family, and he has crossed it many times.

I am here to express that that conduct, to the appalling harm of our family and the American people, both, is unacceptable.

FBI staff member, Tom Lyons, who freely gave me his business card and invited ongoing dialogue when I met him years ago in Hillsborough, CA at a public event, is alleged to have directed desecration of our family home on Cape Cod, allegedly in a quest to "drive the value to zero" of our property when I declined to sell it at his directive.

Now, instead of facing a criminal sentence, which would be most appropriate, Tom Lyons is continuing to direct you to sign your name -- under the most grievous distress -- to false testimony concerning your father and me, your grandparents, and even your brother.

Tom Lyons and his close affiliates would rather murder our entire family than face accountability for his criminal predatory acts in this matter.

I have a better idea.

Tom Lyons now needs to publicly acknowledge that he has lied about this case from the very beginning, and has profiteered to vast degree from our suffering and that of the American people as a whole.

Beyond this, he needs to stop his unconscionable abuse of our family, which includes you, Mary, Graham, Uncle Mike, Aunt Margaret, my brother Brian, and many others, in his predatory quest for false witness statements to bolster his accusations.

This change can only manifest if he is forced out of concealment and into the public square, where I am waiting to speak with him, lawfully and honorably, about his crimes.

And you, my beloved son, are to be rendered free from Tom Lyons' ongoing predatory abuses of power, so repugnant to people of good conscience and integrity.

Tom Lyons has allegedly described his current circumstance as a "crisis," a "predicament," a "turning point," and "the biggest risk yet."

I'm sorry he has placed himself in that position through his consistently criminal choices regarding our family and our nation as a whole.

But that's where my sympathy for the man ends.

The FBI appears to urge me to remain silent this morning because the agency has given me symptoms of diabetes Type 1, Crohn's disease, rales, myocarditis, and more, through undisclosed means.

Again, my ideas about this subject are clearly more reasonable.

The FBI needs to remove its improper conference of symptoms of illness from our family -- all symptoms -- and stop using the lever of suffering and death as a cudgel with which to punish its ethical superiors among America's true leaders.

Duncan, when you were growing up, I didn't think I would need to teach you about the dangers of totalitarianism.  I had not experienced its manifold harms, and I had no basis of reference upon which to draw.

When faced with coercion on the part of the Executive Branch, the FBI, the CIA, and others, the manner in which each person will respond is unique to them.  After the shock of institutional depravity has worn off, each person needs to decide whether to comply with wrongful directives or to resist them.

For me, my fealty to the territory of my soul outweighs other considerations.  I choose never to be false, predatory, harmful, or malicious, as these qualities are anathema to my identity and my personhood.  

And I embrace my honesty, my virtue, my benevolence and my faith even while knowing that the FBI wishes to kill me over these gifts.

How can I criticize you as a victim of torture for the choices you are making in an attempt to survive Tom Lyons' wrongful schemes?

This is not possible.  

And, once again, I would simply say that our judicial system needs to excuse you, as a victim of torture, from all further demands for false witness statements intended to ensure the irretrievable harm of all of our family members, as well as all other "assignments" that would require you to cause harm to others or yourself.

The Executive Branch needs to support its own separation from my children, immediately and permanently, in recognition of the appalling violations of conscience and humanity that it has allowed to persist, authorized, and indeed profited from, in this case.

I will be writing about this matter daily until I receive investigative reports or until I receive honorable outreach regarding my concerns.

History is a harsh master for some, and I invoke it now.

The misconduct of this administration will be writ large on history's page, as will Tom Lyons' crimes against our family, and the appalling misdeeds of his close affiliates unless these men begin an immediate and lifelong apology for their misconduct.

That is just.  That is meet.  That is overdue.

I love you, Duncan Sayer MacWilliams, now and always. Hold this truth within you at all times, and let it fortify you in the challenges at hand.

Mom

The FBI Comes Face to Face with the Righteous Indignation of the American Public

1.  A politician recently stated, apparently with regard to your case, that "the rules are the same for everybody."  May I please have your response to this assertion?

Answer:  First of all, I don't know the context in which this statement was made.  But obviously, the rules are not the same for everyone.  Ask Bryan Kohberger if the rules are the same for everyone.  Ask the Central Park Five if the rules are the same for everyone.  Ask any person who has been wrongfully convicted based on false DNA evidence if the rules are the same for everyone.  And keep in mind, while you're at it, that those who have wrongfully framed the innocent in these cases have immunity from prosecution.

The corrupt law enforcement officials involved have never been formally punished for lying to a court, and they never will be criminally prosecuted.

So, the assertion that the rules are the same for everybody is patently false.  And my work over the past eight years in opposing knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting has focused on the fact that we cannot expect to have a worthy nation emerge in the future from "rules" which allow wayward law enforcement officials to lie with impunity against the rest of us.

2.  What about the FBI's argument that the climate crisis is now so severe that law enforcement officials need to lie about the public in order to justify certain Draconian solutions to the pressures on the environment?

Answer:  It's no longer lawful for the public to comment on this subject directly.  But I need to repeat that the FBI does not need falsified law enforcement reporting to achieve its mission and objectives.  

The agency wants falsified law enforcement reporting in order to manifest totalitarian control over the American public in perpetuity; but it doesn't need this stratagem, and our government should not be allowing it.

There is no plan to sunset these programs.

And now, people are talking about maintaining data centers, which serve to create, aggregate, and disseminate this false reporting, as satellites, separate and apart from any human access or accountability on Earth.

So, this is a disaster in the making, clearly.

The notion that human beings will not lose control of AI-generated false reporting in all of its forms is starkly delusional.

For humanity, this will mean that to ask certain questions is completely forbidden, to challenge certain authority, especially unjust authority, will be punishable by death with no due process, and to be intelligent and expressive will translate to a survival disadvantage.

Without change, we will see a dramatic diminishment of human potential across the board.

3.  You do not ascribe to the FBI's belief that the "ends justify the means" when it comes to false reporting in the law enforcement sphere?

Answer:  Absolutely not.  Behind closed doors, everyone needs to be acknowledging that the FBI represents unjust authority, and further, that the agency should be decommissioned as soon as it is possible, given certain requirements.

As proof of this assertion, the FBI recently committed High Treason in deploying fades against virtually all national elected and appointed leaders in the United States.

So, in the middle term, the FBI will have to go.

4. There will be no way for the government to negotiate with the FBI?

Answer:  You cannot negotiate with someone who wants your life.

The FBI wants the life of the United States.  It stands firmly opposed to our national sovereignty.

So, no.  The agency will have to be decommissioned at the earliest possible point.  This is not in debate, and I don't believe our leaders have any doubt about this necessity.

5.  What about the individuals within the FBI who have falsely accused you and your family members of their own crimes?

Answer:  These are serial killers who have been elevated to a position of authority. And I just need to express that, if our government will tolerate this, the American people will not.  This isn't a difference of opinion or heartfelt beliefs or philosophical divergence.  This is a question of murderers in the FBI blaming the innocent for their own predatory conduct.

That's wrong. It was wrong yesterday, it's wrong today, and it's still going to be wrong tomorrow.

6.  Why hasn't the government been able to rein in these perpetrators within the FBI and associated with the FBI?

Answer:  Because no one wants his or her children to suffer rape, trafficking, torture, shock treatment, near-drowning, drug overdose, brain damage, forced conscription, sovereignty violations, and more, like my children have suffered at the hands of the FBI and its affiliate agencies.  That's why.

7.  Yet you are naming those men who have tortured your family, because you feel there is no other way forward.

Answer:  When you reach the point at which the FBI is obtaining wrongful convictions through concealed court proceedings against your family members and yourself based on fake DNA evidence, it's time to name the names.  You cannot protect the serial killers who are endeavoring to murder your whole family for profit.  

And an ethical person cannot keep silent regarding the FBI's wrongful prosecutions in the past.

You just reach a moment at which the very foundations of your personhood are on the line.

At that point, you need to take charge where others have failed.

8.  What do Tom Lyons and his close affiliates need to do at this time?

Answer:  Acknowledge that they lied from the beginning of this case and appoint an honorable intermediary to begin a lifelong apology.

9.  You have said that the appropriate word for your response to years of false reporting by the FBI is outrage.

Answer:  Outrage, righteous indignation, deep spiritual offense -- all of these words apply.

And the entire American public is going to be experiencing them alongside me, I assure you.

10.  You are insisting that the FBI meet your ethical standards regarding your case and that of others as well.

Answer:  That is correct.

11.  Do you require complete exoneration regarding your family members and yourself?

Answer: I do.  And I also require my family members' honorable discharge from all government programs.

12.  Are you also asking for the resolution of other cases to your satisfaction?

Answer:  Yes, this is necessary.  We cannot tolerate the endurance of injustice.

13.  Assuming Tom Lyons acknowledges his lies about you and your family members, what will happen to him?

Answer:  The OIG Hotline should ensure that every penny he stole throughout this case comes back to my account, as well as assessing astronomical liabilities to others involved in this scheme of false reporting.

The question of his freedom is another matter, related to treasonous crimes against the nation as a whole.

14.  Is there any excuse for the gratuitous harm this man has caused to your family?

Answer:  None.  He has caused us incalculable, intentional, needless, reckless, and irretrievable harm.  There is no justification whatsoever.

15.  What about those within the government who have said that your family is an "acceptable sacrifice" for their own welfare?

Answer:  Well, this is always what it comes down to with those who argue that "the ends justify the means."  What they really mean is that their gain justifies the public's suffering.  And ultimately, when an FBI official stakes his entire career and reputation on lying about the most serious crimes possible, he has a conflict of interest in arguing that the silencing of his victims serves some "greater good" than that of his own enrichment, entitlement, and impunity.

Do you know how you can tell who is virtuous in a situation like this?

The virtuous person is saying, meet me in an open courtroom and let's have this discussion in the full view of the American public.

Liars do not want that outcome, and, in fact, they will go to murderous lengths to prevent it.

16.  Could Tom Lyons meet you in an open courtroom?

Answer:  The man would never have the courage to do so, in my opinion.

Could he be dragged there against his will by a civil suit regarding his astronomical liability to me?  That's possible.

17.  You are not willing to have your beloved parents, or any other family members, wrongfully blamed by the FBI.

Answer:  I am not.

18.  Given that your sons were wrongfully conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program, does the Pxxxxxx Program often sacrifice its own people?

Answer:  All the time.  In fact, everyone conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program is slated for death after a certain point.  The FBI simply doesn't want anyone left to tell the tale.  It's too monstrous a story, and government agencies wish to preserve their reputations in a historical context.

19.  What is your response when the FBI claims that your sons have to die because they "know too much"?

Answer:  Did the agency ask my permission for this conclusion, or is this a thought they are trying to think on their own, without adult supervision?

The FBI should not be trying to make any further decisions about my family members.  They have proven their judgment to be abysmal.  We don't need any further demonstrations of that fact.

20.  What about the argument that you should not be naming Tom Lyons as your accuser?

Answer:  He freely gave me his business card at a public meeting.  Why does Tom Lyons have the right to falsely accuse me of the most heinous crimes, yet exert wrongful authority to prevent my robust self-defense?  The Constitution says that I have the right to face my accuser in a court of law.  Bring it on.  This man either needs to face me through due process, knowing that I will reveal all I know about his crimes, or he needs to concede defeat at this juncture regarding his lies -- one or the other.

21.  What should happen to your properties, given the alleged crimes of Tom Lyons and the FBI against you and your family members?

Answer:  That's up to the Congress and the DOJ, keeping in mind that the FBI should not be allowed to impoverish a human rights advocate through predatory acts.

22.  Has the FBI ceased trying to cause you harm within your apartment building, Aura apartments, at this time?

Answer:  My apartment appeared to have been wrongfully entered yesterday afternoon, so, no, the FBI has not yet understood its position regarding my safety and security.

23.  Will you please keep in close contact with us, given these astonishing circumstances?

Answer:  Of course, yes.

24.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

NOT a Difficult Decision

OIG Hotline, this is to document that the actual killer of the four college students in Moscow, Idaho on November 13, 2022 was close FBI affiliate and Russian organized crime figure Brandan Pesa, not Bryan Kohberger, the young man who was wrongfully convicted of this heinous crime.  FBI staff member Tom Lyons is alleged to have been directly involved in the planning and execution of this egregious violence.

There are hundreds of sealed documents regarding the trial that convicted Bryan Kohberger, because the FBI argued that the Pxxxxxx Program, under which auspices this violence was committed, must be maintained a secret from the American public.

Yet it is also the Pxxxxxx Program which has allegedly been directed to harm my family members and myself.

Mr. Kohberger allegedly pled guilty to the crimes due to the fact that the FBI intentionally conveyed HIV to him during his time in prison, and threatened to allow him to die without treatment unless he wrongfully confessed.

The agency committed extensive DNA tampering regarding the evidence in this trial.  The original judge, unsympathetic to the FBI, was removed from the case.  The house in which this horrific crime occurred was demolished by the University of Idaho at FBI directive prior to the verdict being rendered.  And the local police chief who was forced to follow FBI directives regarding these events is now retired.

My offer to Bryan Kohberger's attorney to stand as a witness in defense of Mr. Kohberger was improperly ignored.

I often think of Bryan Kohberger and his family, just as I think of me and mine.

The innocent should not be accused and preyed upon by men such as Tom Lyons and Brandan Pesa.  Rather, it is necessary to battle back with the truth, so that at least the public can grasp the predatory objectives of the FBI in wrongfully preying upon its honorable betters.

Mr. Kohberger deserves release from prison, and my family deserves complete exoneration, both on an immediate basis.

And I will continue to write about these events until and unless I have honorable and peaceable outreach that meets my ethical requirements for Mr. Kohberger's case and my own.

Good people, this is NOT a difficult decision.

Not at all.

I remain most sincerely an advocate for the long term human rights of the American people,

Lane MacWilliams