Post in Progress

 1.  What threats are you facing currently within your hotel room at Day's Inn in Lincoln, Illinois?

Answer:  There appears to be an allegation of room entry during our absence this evening while my dogs and I were purchasing dinner, with a specific suggestion of a sxxxxx vector deployed in the room during that time period.

2.  Can sxxxxx vectors be deadly to the victims?

Answer:  Quite so.  They can convey any number of diseases, and, in the case of a zoonotic illness, my dogs could become ill a short time prior to any signs in myself.

3.  Who is actually responsible for sxxxxx vector deployments?  The FBI?  Robert F. Kennedy?  The President?  Who is authorizing these deployments?

Answer:  You know, once again, these are Executive directives, so, in general, staff members feel that they are compelled to comply.

4.  Has the vector affected one or both of your dogs as of yet?

Answer:  I think they're still alright as of this moment.  But their continued health and my own will depend upon the cancellation of all plans to deploy any sxxxxx vector within my hotel room or elsewhere.

5.  Did you consider moving hotel rooms?

Answer:  I'm already in a different hotel room every night.  What needs to change now is the impunity with which the FBI is stalking, harassing, and harming a profound advocate for American sovereignty.  

6.  What would the symptoms be if you were affected by this deployment?

Answer:  Generalized arthritis, rapid aging, tick-borne diseases, mosquito-borne diseases, heart attack, aortic dissection, HIV, hepatitis B or C, stroke, dementia, aneurysm, anemia, kidney disease, liver disease -- this list goes on.

7.  So any decline in your health whatsoever would likely be connected to this wrongful deployment.

Answer:  Yes, it would.

8.  How did the FBI gain access to your hotel room in the first place, if I might ask?  This is Day's Inn, which is a Wyndham hotel.  Did they hand over the key to your room?  

Answer:  Allegedly, they did, yes.  The FBI comes along and calls the situation a "national security matter."  Then they appropriate a hotel room key.

9.  Did you have any signs that this trespass could occur?

Answer:  When I left in search of dinner, a police department vehicle was parked at the entrance to the street, as if waiting for my departure.  And previously, in the parking lot, there had been two spotters, so this was a concerning red flag as well.

10.  What are spotters?

Answer:  Surveillance personnel, normally on their phones or with a headset, actively reporting on your location and activities.  

11.  Do they stand out?

Answer:  Immediately.  These are people who are very busy doing nothing and going nowhere.

12.  Is all of this intended to prevent you from obtaining reports that you have requested from the state of Illinois?

Answer:  Apparently so, yes.

13.  And those are due imminently?

Answer:  Yes.

14.  May I ask your perspective on allegations that there is a new attempt to wrongfully challenge your California residency, and, correspondingly, your right to vote in the June 2, 2026 election?

Answer:  I have been prevented from returning to California due to the allegation that there is a wrongful "death squad sentence" against me, allegedly due to Txx Lxxxx' crimes against my family involving my properties.  I should not have to die to prove that I am a California resident.

15.  Is there an intention to sell your home in California?

Answer:  The home is not on the market, and I don't think Txx Lxxxx has any intention of allowing the home to be placed on the market.  The fact that my husband would like to sell the home seems entirely immaterial.  My husband's hxxxxxr appears to have done everything possible to obstruct my husband's moving forward in selling the home.  The agency cannot have it both ways.  If the FBI cannot stand up to the public scrutiny of whatever Txx Lxxxx did regarding my properties, the agency should confess that much.  But when the FBI drives a human rights advocate from her home through harassment and predatory abuse, the agency has no right to claim that she willingly left her address.

I was born in California, my primary residence is in California, my sons were born in California, my family's primary residences are in California, and I would be in California right now if the FBI had allowed me to travel back to my home state in a safe and timely way.

Further, I had a short term rental in Arizona that would also be closed out if it were not for the FBI's predatory conduct.

So, again, we have an agency which is obstructing the free and safe movement of a human rights advocate within the United States while simultaneously accusing her of failing to demonstrate a return to her home state through free and safe movement.

16.  If the agency had allowed you to sell your homes, would you have been able to search for another place to live within California?

Answer:  Obviously, if the FBI had allowed one or both of my homes to be sold, then I would be able to search for another home in California.  Without this, the agency has deprived me of all of my property rights, and then proceeded to complain that I am dispossessed.

Despite all of the agency's criminal conduct against my family, my legal address is still in Portola Valley, where I own my primary residence together with my husband.  I have no other permanent home whatsoever.

And if the agency burned my house to the ground, my current and legal home would still be in California.

17.  You have been traveling for a few months in an attempt to obtain information regarding your case through requests to State Atttorneys General.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

18.  Do you feel that you may now be close to obtaining material relating to your case?

Answer:  I hope that I am, because that progress would allow me to reclaim my safety in a much more substantive and lasting way.

Obviously, when the FBI is breaking into my hotel room in order to carry out a "sentence" related to its own crimes, utterly unknown to me, things have reached a dystopian stage.

19.  The FBI has asserted that FOIA material related to property may be withheld in the state of Illinois.

Answer:  That provision is not intended to support knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  It is intended to relieve the Attorney General's Office from the burden of releasing information on property tax, which should be requested from the County assessor.  In this case, I am asking for any and all information relating to the FBI's allegations about me.  So, if the FBI says that I committed any crimes connected to my property(ies), then that information is still due to me under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.

Truman Upheld

 1.  You are being threatened with a car bombing, shooting, drone assault, staged car accident, harm to your family members, and more if you insist on full disclosure to you within reports now due to you through the Illinois Freedom of Information Act.  Is that correct?

Answer:  I have received these apparent threats, yes.

2.  Who would possibly have approved of harms like these?  Don't these threats fall under the heading of extortion?

Answer:  You know, the threats certainly have a military component, given the repeated mention of drone assault.  So I would consider the possibility that Pete Hegseth is offering "alternatives" in this circumstance.

The problem here is that concealed misappropriations may well be sequestered by the enemies of United States' sovereignty, such as Vladimir Putin, Xi Xinping, and others.  And we need to assume that they will be if these misappropriated funds are not returned.  

We don't want this case, which is intended to ensure Americans' sovereignty, to result in the foreclosure of their freedoms.  

So, we need to ask that full disclosure be included in the reports, and we need to guarantee that this occurs.

3.  That means that tremendous pressure is being exerted on a handful of people at this time, you and your family foremost among them, doesn't it?

Answer:  It does, and I would also include key investigative personnel in the OIG Hotline, central accounting personnel, and others who know what the judgments have been over the course of this case.  I'm not suggesting that all information is public information, but I am suggesting that, given my advocacy for the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, the disclosures to me should be complete, without redactions or omissions.

4.  What about the suggestion that Pete Hegseth could order inappropriate aggression against you or your family and then simply lose his job at a later time?

Answer:  It's a substantive risk, this kind of planned disavowal of responsibility.  With ongoing turnover in the cabinet, those risks rise, certainly.  

I think the best defense against that stratagem is to talk about it, as we're doing now.

5.  Where does the ultimate responsibility rest with regard to planned aggression against an American human rights advocate?

Answer:  Truman said it best with "The buck stops here."  This is an Executive Branch responsibility.

6.  Is President Trump now responsible for your health and safety, along with the health and safety of your loved ones?

Answer:  Absolutely.  This timing is critical, because of the fact that reports are now due to me. So, we all should be hale and hearty, including our pets, while that provision of information is extended to me in its entirety.

7.  What about threats that a bomb has been placed in your vehicle?  Don't those concerns inhibit your freedom to travel?

Answer:  I'll be checking out of my hotel at 11:00 AM.  That means that anyone involved in this alleged aggression has one hour to remove any and all harmful devices before I drive away.  Fifty-five minutes, to be precise.

8.  You are insisting on the American people's right to sovereignty in the long term by requiring the provision of reports in their entirety?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

A tremendous number of our freedoms depend on this kind of benevolent but unyielding insistence.

This is the time for us to express it.

9.  Will you please keep in close contact with us, given these circumstances?

Answer:  Of course, yes.

10.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Formal Claim of All Awards Pertaining to Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting

 To the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, this letter is to formally claim all awards that have been extended in adjudication of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates at this time.

This is to include all awards extended in my name and/or associated with my identity and/or social security number as of this writing.  This is to include my maiden name, Carol Elaine Von Herzen, and misspellings of my maiden name, my author name, Lane von Herzen, and misspellings of my author name, and my married name, Lane MacWilliams, and misspellings of my married name.

This is also to include any and all funds extended through adjudication of other cases of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates, if the Supreme Court has ruled that those funds may be legally and ethically claimed and deposited into the Foundation I have designated for the preservation of the sovereignty of the United States.

Due to apparent repeated attempts to misappropriate these funds, please place them in the Foundation at your earliest opportunity, thus protecting them from invasion by those who may seek to personally profiteer from this case.

If government agencies or current or former government officials have facilitated the hacking or invasion of my accounts in order to misappropriate funds awarded to me, I ask that those funds be assertively re-appropriated and replaced.

Please allow me to make designations on behalf of specific causes for the support of Americans' long term sovereignty, and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole, from this umbrella Foundation.

I ask that any funds that have been wrongfully withdrawn and cannot be legally reclaimed be reimbursed to my account under the auspices of the Foundation at the earliest possible time.

Please ensure that my direct participation is required for designations of funds from the Foundation in every circumstance, unless I myself broaden that responsibility at a later time through notarized documentation which I would place on my blog and elsewhere for public review.  And please disallow impersonation of my identity through genetic manipulation, Wifi piracy, namesake or familial claims that are unknown to me and unconsented by me, and/or other unapproved assumptions of my identity.

At the appropriate time, please engage in direct outreach to me to ensure that I can be of the greatest support to the nation at this most critical point in the struggle for the human sovereignty of the American people, the territorial integrity of our national provenance over the United States and associated waters, and the future independence of our nation in its entirety.

Please accept all legal responsibility for the correct and complete filing of documents, paperwork, reporting, exact and comprehensive accounting, and follow up associated with the Foundation and the designations I have made and will make regarding the support for American sovereignty.

Thank you for your support in this most critical effort.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Emails to the OIG HOTLINE

 OIG Hotline, please see the following emails sent to the attention of your Office.  Please note that this list is not complete.

August 17, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as possible, sent at 10:20 AM Central Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 6:55 AM Central Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, August 17, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 6:52 AM Central Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: JPEG Files of LM Notarized Affidavit, Confidential, sent at 6:42 AM Central Time.

August 16, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: LM Notarized Statement, August 16, 2028, Confidential, sent at 10:28 PM Central Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: My Support for You Is Always Present, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 12:07 PM Central Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 11:19 AM Central Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, August 16, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 11:14 AM Central Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, August 16, 2026, sent at 11:06 AM Central Time.

August 15, 2026:

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Formal Claim of All Awards Pertaining to Knowingly Falsified Law Enforcement Reporting, sent at 4:24 PM Central Daylight Time.

When Children Are Ordered to Lie: Should the United States Emulate a North Korean Stratagem to Allow FBI Misappropriations?

1. You have previously stated that every single American has a dossier of false reporting from the FBI.  Does that include children?

Answer:  It does, yes.  And we really need to pause here for a moment to understand the seriousness of the mistake when a society decides to commence institutional lying about children from birth.

2.  What form might those lies take?

Answer:  Any form at all, because the information is increasingly AI-generated.  The point is that it doesn't have to be true.  Does your child ask the wrong question in front of an Amazon Echo?  They could be classified as psychologically aberrant, and that information is aggregated.  Does your teenager swear in front of friends?  They could be viewed as having an anger disorder. That information is logged.  Does your child pick the wrong topic or the wrong perspective if he or she is studying the Civil Rights Movement in American history class?  That writing may be interpreted as subversive, and that information is made part of the permanent record.  But in addition, if your child uses social media, he or she is being documented as taking part in chat groups he or she has never heard of, as engaging in dialogue (actually AI-generated) that could be viewed as dangerous to the public interest, as extending threats toward others (also AI-generated) that your child never expressed, etc.

3.  Yet, aren't our children innocent?

Answer:  Yes, our children are innocent.  This is what we need to now assert and this is what we need to be expressing to our children on an ongoing basis.

All children will ask questions.  All children will be curious about the world.  All children will have developmental anomalies that don't fit a standard time table. 

Einstein had a serious depression at the age of fifteen or sixteen.  How tolerant would we be of that setback at this point in our history?

4.  What happens when our children are confronted with the dossiers of false reporting the FBI has aggregated about them?

Answer:  If the FBI reveals documentation that could result in charges or arrest, then the agency is seeking coercion, false witness statements implicating family members or friends, human trafficking compromise, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, and more.

5.  Haven't your own young adult sons been given Executive Orders to sign knowingly false witness statements?

Answer:  The FBI appears to allege that they have, yes.

6.  And what do those knowingly false witness statements allege?

Answer:  The FBI appears to suggest that they contain the usual misogynist tropes of promiscuity and/or mental illness.

7.  The FBI and its affiliates, including the Executive Branch, are forcing your sons to sign this documentation containing defamatory statements about you?

Answer:  This is the allegation, yes.

8.  For the purpose of theft on the part of this administration?

Answer;  I cannot comment on the amount of funds that may have been misappropriated on this basis.  But avarice seems to be a powerful motivator in this case, certainly.

9.  Has the FBI suggested that you should accept the defamation in this instance?

Answer:  The FBI has always suggested that I should accept the agency's defamation, including this instance.

10.  What is your willingness to be called unstable by an agency that is attempting to steal from accounts bearing your name?

Answer:  Zero.  The FBI's defamation is a prelude to murder in each and every case.  In my situation, one in which I am advocating for the sovereignty of many Americans, no defamation can be viewed as acceptable or tolerable.

11.  The FBI is currently urging you to "resign."  What does that mean?  Have you had any direct communication from anyone affiliated with the government?

Answer:  None.  I did receive a mostly redacted report from the FBI at the insistence of the ODNI several years ago, which demonstrated that the FBI was wrongfully referring complainants to Adult Protective Services in order to justify their ongoing surveillance.

But other than this, I have received no substantive provision of documentation.

12.  Is that about to change with your FOIA request to the State of Illinois?

Answer:  I don't know.  I was supposed to receive notification from the Public Access Counselor yesterday about their decision to force the Secretary of State Police to provide me with documentation.

13.  Did you receive any email regarding this decision?

Answer:  I did not have it in my gmail inbox, no.  Having said that, the FBI often erases critical emails from my inbox.  So, it's entirely possible that it was sent to me.

Given that the FBI appears now to suggest that I will be shot if I don't "resign," it seems likely that there is a missing email communication.

14.  What is your perspective on your circumstances as they now stand?

Answer:  I would certainly like to learn what the Public Access Counselor has to say.

15.  And what about the false accusations your sons are allegedly being ordered to sign?

Answer:  It is indefensible for any part of the United States government to be directing family members to lie about family members.

That's North Korean gulag territory.

That does not reflect worthy American conduct.

16.  Will your sons correct the record soon enough?

Answer:  They will, without doubt.  But the funds associated with this case need to be protected from misappropriation in the interim.

17.  Will you please remain in close communication with us today, given these unprecedented circumstances?

Answer:  Yes, of course.

18.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Did Chase Bank Defame a Customer Seeking a Notarization on Behalf of the American Interest?

 OIG Hotline, I will share the information below with Illinois officials this morning in order to be certain that they remain fully informed.

I did ask Chase Bank officer Dwayne Keith Ticer if I had his permission to audio record or video record the notarization process, and he refused.  If, following this, false audio and false video were produced in a defamatory initiative by the FBI, that certainly points out the extreme imbalance in the public's right to record themselves and the FBI's right to lie about them through AI-generated disinformation.

This is to confirm that my conversation with Mr. Ticer was cordial, polite, respectful and professional in every regard.

Mr. Ticer did comment for an inordinate period of time about how children in their teens and twenties seemed to be constantly staring at their phones.  This appeared to be a non-sequitur, unrelated to anything we had discussed previously.

And it's worth pointing out that eye contact during a banking meeting, which was appropriate in this case, is much less important than honesty and integrity.

Please note that Mr. Ticer's original documentation misspelled my last name as Lane Macwilliams, with a lowercase "w," and when I pointed this out to him, he recreated the document from the beginning and voided the original.

Given the number of times the FBI appears to have directed this exact error recently, Mr. Ticer's identical misspelling did not appear accidental.

At the conclusion of our meeting, he removed the original documentation for shredding.

While I am not able to file a complaint with Chase Bank, it is appropriate for me to request an injunction against false reporting by Chase Bank in this instance.

Given the sensitivity of my FOIA request, and the importance of its timely fulfillment, an order of injunctive relief will place a stay on further defamation by the FBI and its affiliates -- a buffer against further falsehoods that appears to be necessary at this time.

Please be informed that, immediately following the notarization at Chase Bank, I was followed closely by a BMW sedan, the driver of which was following my (lawful) U-turns to evade him for a certain time period.

Together with this, the FBI was extending threats of my being shot by a small caliber weapon, potentially wielded by a woman, in a "contract" assault.

This leads me to wonder whether the bank officers involved may have falsely asserted that I extended threats of some kind that could have justified immediate violence and further whether false AI-generated documentation of an interaction that never took place was created by the FBI and its affiliates, and wrongfully supported for pay by the Mr. Ticer.

The public has no defense against this sort of collusive malfeasance.

Yet the American people as a whole should not have to suffer if Mr. Ticer accepted a payoff or if other employees at the same Chase Bank branch joined in.

Please assist me in ensuring that Chase Bank not obstruct the interests of Americans by contributing to the knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting of the FBI and its affiliates in this instance.

If Chase Bank employees have acted wrongfully in this instance, Americans' long term access to sovereignty should not suffer through withheld documentation of FBI misconduct.

Thank you for your intervention in this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Sent to Chase Bank Customer Satisfaction on August 12, 2026 at 8:03 PM.

Dear Chase Bank: 

This communication is to confirm that today, August 12, 2026. I visited your Champaign, Illinois branch on 301 S. Mattis Ave. in order to have a personal affidavit notarized by bank officer, Dwayne Keith Ticer. 

Because I am a human rights advocate involved in an important federal case, I need to provide general affidavits regarding my lawfulness and integrity on a fairly regular basis to the US Department of Justice. Having said that, the government agency which feels most implicated by this case often pressures notaries, including bank officers, to file false witness statements regarding my capacity, my cogency, and my state of mind pertaining to notarizations. Sometimes, the agency involved will produce knowingly falsified video within a few hours of these appointments, depicting me engaged in dialogue or actions that never took place.  AI generated video and audio is now sufficiently sophisticated that this material is credible and rapidly produced.  

Having said that, when I walk into Chase Bank as a customer, I expect truthfulness and integrity in all of my interactions, including any and all witness statements that may be collected afterwards.

Today, as every day, my interactions with Chase Bank staff, including Mr. Ticer, were respectful, cordial, polite, and professional in every way, shape, and form. 

While Mr. Ticer was able to provide me with an individual acknowledgment appended to my affidavit, he did not request that I sign his logbook, a step which is ordinarily required by every notary when documenting an authorization process in person. Without this critical step, in-person notarizations cannot be considered complete.  

This omission, in and of itself, represents a significant indicator that Mr. Ticer may have been wrongfully influenced by a third-party pertaining to my notarization process. 

Correspondingly, Mr. Ticer is highly likely to be asked to sign a falsified witness statement regarding this notary appointment. 

As follow up, I called Chase Bank customer service this evening and spoke to Rahul on a recorded line, with a separate recording also conducted and pre-announced by me, to document this circumstance.  He extended helpful guidance, and acknowledged the courtesy, cogency, and respectful tenor of all aspects of our phone conversation. 

In addition, I am following up with this written communication to suggest that Chase Bank direct Mr. Ticer to support only the truth about our notary appointment today. 

Again, the omission of Mr. Ticer’s request for my signature in his logbook serves as a strong indication that he may have been directed a priori to corrupt the notarization process. 

Given this problem, I will now need to seek duplicate notarization of my affidavit, representing substantial delay and attendant risks to my legal case advocating for the long term human rights of all Americans. 

I will appreciate Chase Bank’s withdrawal of any and all falsified documents and information regarding my visit to Chase Bank today. 

Certainly, there is no business model for a consumer bank which engages in active defamation of its customers, and correspondingly contributes to  the harm that may follow as a direct consequence. 

I look forward to your outreach concerning the resolution of this matter. 

Please note that this communication does not constitute a complaint, and should not be listed as a complaint. The reason for this is that any complaint can be found fraudulent if accompanied by improper information from any source, and fraud constitutes a felony offense which could damage my human rights advocacy. 

I appreciate your strict observation of my request regarding this point. 

Thank you very much for your support. 

Sincerely yours,

Lane MacWilliams 

Recent Emails to the OIG Hotline

OIG Hotline, please see the following emails, recently sent to your Office.

August 14, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: I Did Not Sign Replacement Real Estate POA Documentation Requested By My Husband's Hxxxxxx, sent at 12:40 PM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: When Children Are Ordered to Lie:  Should the United States Emulate a North Korean Stratagem to Allow FBI Misappropriations, sent at 11:36 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Strange Behavior from Bxxxxxx Front Desk Staff, sent at 11:17 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as possible, sent at 10:58 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLNE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 9:40 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, August 15, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 9:36 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Thank you for shopping at Walgreens, sent at 7:59 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, August 15, 2026, 7:53 AM Central Daylight Time.

August 13, 2026

ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: R

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Battling False Claims, sent at 8:57 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, August 13, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:54 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Request for Honorable Withdrawal of Any Improper FedEx Incident Report, sent at 8:12 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update Re: August 12/13, 2026, sent at 7:28 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Boys, please respond as soon as possible, sent at 6:45 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Did Chase Bank Defame a Customer Seeking a Notarization on Behalf of the American Interest?, sent at 5:46 AM Central Daylight Time.

August 12, 2026

• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: Battling False Claims, sent at 8:10 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Background Information, August 12, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 8:08 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Update, August 11/12, 2026, Conditionally Confidential, sent at 7:48 AM Central Daylight Time.
• ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: Fwd: ATTN: Hilton Honors... sent at 6:31 AM Central Daylight Time.