1. You are having a family gathering this afternoon at your Portola Valley home, just before your younger son and daughter-in-law leave to relocate to New York City.
Answer: Yes, this is true.
2. What are the alleged directives that have been extended to both of your sons under these circumstances?
Answer: Allegedly, the FBI and its affiliates are directing my sons to falsely attest to witness statements suggesting mental illness on my part, specifically depression, anxiety or delusional thinking.
3. These false statements have been coerced from your sons previously, so it seems that the FBI and its affiliates are expressing a pattern in this regard. What are your thoughts about this?
Answer: The consistent misogyny on the part of the agency is concerning. And I say this because it is highly unlikely that any young men anywhere are going to untie the Gordian knot of the FBI's perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.
4. Why?
Answer: There is too much pressure for them to comply with dominantly male totalitarian initiatives -- either through military structures or intelligence agencies.
In other words, the agencies that have profiteered from the trafficking of America's youth are not going to be solving the problem of the trafficking of America's youth.
The organizations that have profiteered from the perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against the American public are not going to be solving the problem of false reporting.
These institutions are filled with young men.
But to make real progress, we need women and men of goodwill, wisdom, courage and insight working together -- and they probably won't be young.
5. And the reason for this?
Answer: The young are being victimized too broadly to mount any effective defense of themselves or the nation as a whole. Only people who are not being trafficked have their heads above water enough to see the patterns of predation and their possible solutions.
6. Are your sons both in the position, once again, of being functionally enslaved to demands for false witness statements?
Answer: There can be no question about this. And if we have any doubt, I can bring into the public square the identity of a certain physician who treated my older son with an unwanted procedure in March of 2025, one which has placed him in the position of constantly having his life threatened by his agency.
7. You are not going to accept further false reporting among your family members?
Answer: Absolutely not.
8. Do your sons both require surgical remediation of the surgical harms that were previously caused to them without their foreknowledge or consent?
Answer: They do, yes.
9. What about the medical care now required by your family? Is President Trump demonstrating the leadership to insist that this be provided on an immediate basis?
Answer: I hope that the President is prioritizing my family's health under these extraordinary circumstances, yes.
10. What is the amount of awards that have been awarded to you over the full duration of your case?
Answer: The FBI appears to assert that it is between 63 and 64 T as of this morning.
11. And the Supreme Court has insisted that the full accounting be provided to you, even though those details have not yet been extended. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
12. So, the FBI has ignored the Supreme Court's ruling on this issue, and is now directing that your sons both lie about a family gathering that is to take place at your home this afternoon?
Answer: These allegations appear to be present, yes.
13. There is allegedly some concern regarding funds that may have been misappropriated from awards extended to you through this case. Specifically, the DOJ is wrestling with whether and how those funds should be repaid. What are your thoughts about this?
Answer: I think this needs to be a determination by the Supreme Court, with the Honorable Justices understanding that misappropriated funds that end up in the hands of the opponents of the sovereignty of the United States represent a significant threat to our freedoms in the future.
14. At one point, the FBI appeared to state that Vladimir Putin had received a "gift" of cash from President Trump, derived directly from misappropriations from awards extended to you in this case. Is that your recollection?
Answer: Yes, it is.
15. What if you were to receive an accounting that showed that 20 T from this case had been misappropriated?
Answer: I would want to know whether the Supreme Court or the DOJ was aware of where those resources ultimately traveled.
16. Why?
Answer: Because when you're enriching unknown individuals by this amount of personal wealth, the obstacles to the sovereignty of Americans in the future are rising, not falling.
17. Would you accept an accounting with 20 T missing from total awards extended to you?
Answer: Good people need to start working together on behalf of the American people. Of course I would accept that prompt provision. Then I would hope that the Supreme Court would rule on any missing funds in this case, knowing that the intent of this case has always been to support and uphold Americans' long term sovereignty.
18. Your assertion is that women cannot be excluded as leaders in the initiative to defend our long term human rights as Americans.
Answer: I believe that ethical women, along with ethical men, have taken the initiative to advance this case from the beginning.
Will we be able to solve the problem of the FBI's perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting without women's continued forward role? No. We need women to continue to provide their insight, their wisdom, their courage, their compassion, their intellectual gifts, and their insistence on the worthy path forward.
And they need to be leading in this capacity.
I won't see them sidelined, just as I myself will not be sidelined.
19. What is your response to the FBI's persistent false allegations regarding your psychological stability?
Answer: I am a remarkably resilient person psychologically, and, while I cannot credit the FBI with these gifts in their entirety, I can say that the FBI has made me much, much stronger than I was eight years ago, at the outset of my advocacy.
20. In what way, may I ask?
Answer: The FBI preys upon most "targets of interest" by attempting to isolate them from social approbation and support. My response to that has been to speak the truth as compellingly as possible about the agency's wrongful stratagems. And this approach has consistently brought me more support, not less.
21. Will you please report back here following your family gathering this afternoon?
Answer: Most certainly.
22. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment