Lane von Herzen: Accountable

My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.

Monday, March 23, 2026

Accountable

1. Has Trump advisor Stephen Miller allegedly advocated for the theft of your entire awards from the U.S. DOJ?

Answer: This is what the FBI alleges, yes.

2. On what basis, please?

Answer: On the basis of knowingly false accusations by the FBI.

3. Are these related to your family property on Cape Cod?

Answer: The FBI is alleged to have extended so many false accusations, it is unknown which lies are being emphasized in this latest attempt to steal from the American people through intended misappropriations.

4. Have these referenced misappropriations yet occurred?

Answer: Not yet.

5. Must Attorney General Pam Bondi approve them?

Answer: I'm sure that approval is required.

6. Is there any sense whatsoever that these individuals are accountable to history, to the public's evaluation, or to you yourself for this conduct?

Answer: I think you are asking whether there is fear on the part of anyone involved regarding the possibility of being exposed for unprecedented theft from the American people of funds totaling many trillions of dollars.

And the answer is yes, these people are conscious that they are suggesting flagrant violations of the law, of ethical standards, of judicial boundaries, and of reasoned judgement.

7. Can wrongful appropriations from your account be halted?

Answer: Most certainly. But the Congress and the Supreme Court need to demonstrate the determination to protect the future of human sovereignty by blocking this attempt to steal those funds.

8. Will they do so?

Answer: We need to call on them to do so, because the stakes are so high.

9. Can you articulate them once more, please?

Answer: If we allow the misappropriation of funds from my account, we are allowing the aggregation of wrongful wealth in the hands of those who will destroy all hope of human sovereignty in the future. The transfer of massive wealth to foreign adversaries of the United States, which will be the inevitable result of misappropriations, will prevent us from recovering our most fundamental human freedoms in the future.

It cannot be allowed.

10. What should happen with regard to those advising this conduct, in this case Stephen Miller, allegedly?

Answer: The greatest quality of leadership is wisdom. Where it is lacking, the risks for disastrous outcomes are greatly amplified.

I don't know Stephen Miller, but I am deeply concerned about the allegations that have been extended in this instance.

11. Won't these problems continue to occur unless the Supreme Court ruling concerning your case is upheld through appropriate communication with you regarding the investigative reports?

Answer: As long as there is defiance and disrespect for the Supreme Court by those responsible for upholding the ruling, the risks are untenable.

12. Who is most responsible for upholding the Supreme Court's ruling?

Answer: The United States Department of Justice, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, clearly.

13. Is AG Pam Bondi also responsible for protecting funds in your account from wrongful invasion?

Answer: Yes, she must hold the line defined by the Supreme Court with regard to protecting the funds.

14. Are you still awaiting honorable outreach regarding your case?

Answer: Yes, I am.

15. Are your children and daughter in law still being threatened with active harm by their agencies?

Answer: Most definitely.

16. Your older son has what appears to be an electrical burn on the back of his left hand. What caused this injury, please?

Answer: There appears to be the possibility that this was caused by a contact pad associated with electric shock.

17. Are you referencing intentional torture when you say "electric shock"?

Answer: Yes, I am.

18. To what does your son attribute this injury?

Answer: To scalding water at the kitchen sink in his apartment.

19. Is this explanation plausible?

Answer: No, his apartment building sets controls on water temperature that are quite low by comparison to the standard water temperature range. So, there is no possibility that he was scalded by hot water anywhere in the building.

20. Has your older son suffered electric shock torture in the past?

Answer: Yes, the FBI alleges that this crime has been committed against him previously.

21. By whom?

Answer: By agency affiliates at the directive of the FBI within his apartment building.

22. Isn't this conduct illegal?

Answer: For FBI contractors to be torturing American citizens within the continental United States? Yes, I believe that is illegal in every measure.

23. Do you believe that the FBI's ongoing involvement in human trafficking also constitutes torture?

Answer: Without question, it does.

24. So the human rights of your children are being egregiously violated while you are advocating for the long term human rights of all Americans?

Answer: Yes.

25. You must be profoundly displeased.

Answer: Mightily displeased, yes.