OIG Hotline, the FBI alleges that a particular Justice has authorized terrible harm to me on the basis of knowingly false allegations put forward by the FBI — allegedly pertaining to wrongful Pxxxxxx Program allegations relating to our family home in Massachusetts. My sons have once again been coerced to extend complete lies, according to the agency itself, as the result of repeated visits by two uniformed DoD personnel demanding false statements from each of them as a “national security matter.”
Who authorized these coercive visits to my sons and MG, which were, it is alleged, accompanied by death threats from my sons’ handlers?
Who sought to justify the assassination of an FBI whistleblower in this manner?
And who will now acknowledge to the Court that these lies were directed by the person who also authorized their creation and aggregation?
Is this someone who would stand to benefit financially from my demise?
Politically?
In other ways?
I will appreciate a rigorous appeal in this matter. The fact that a member of the Court allegedly sentenced me to death in absentia for crimes of which I know nothing whatsoever represents a terrible failure of jurisprudence within our country.
And what am I to make of the FBI’s allegation that the “re-opening” of a sweepstakes to meet certain political candidates at the highest level, sent to me at 10:22 AM this morning via email, is accompanied by a plan of assassination toward me involving a shooting, allegedly approved by the same politician who directed the coercion of my sons and the placement of wrongful Pxxxxxx Program “evidence” through the DoD?
The conflicts of interest in this circumstance, if the FBI’s assertions about false evidence presented to the Court anre to be believed, are stunning. They cannot be justified, overlooked, or ignored.
No government should be perpetrating murder for profit. No White House should be condoning, directing, or authorizing it.
And, if the FBI’s allegations about the agency’s false reporting in this matter have been committed, this malfeasance — on the part of everyone involved — should be exposed and redressed.
Please consider this my Statement of Appeal should the FBI’s account of wrongdoing by the agency and its leadership represent a credible and factual account.
Most respectfully,
Sunday, October 6, 2024
Statement of Appeal, If Appropriate
Maintaining Open Lines of Communication
OIG Hotline, please be apprised of an email within my gmail account, bearing the subject heading of Notes to Myself Re: Apparent FBI Threat of Facebook Deletion, Email Deletion, Blog Deletion and Ransomware or Similar Attack, sent at 6:35 AM today, October 6, 2024.
I would respectfully request that you access the contents of this documentation at your earliest convenience.
It is important for me to state that I will not be deleting my blog, my Facebook account, or my gmail accounts, nor will I be deleting any other online account at this time. I wish to reiterate that all of my online accounts reflect my honorable and lawful conduct, as does the rest of my life.
Clearly, my ability to communicate publicly and daily helps to preserve my life at this time, as well as the lives of my loved ones, and, indeed, courageous others.
In gratitude for your efforts now, as always,
Lane MacWilliams
Saturday, October 5, 2024
Important Email for the OIG Hotline
False Claims and Helicopter Flyovers
1. You had a double helicopter flyover yesterday evening at 7:21 PM, October 4, 2024. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is. Two helicopters flew over my residence of 45 Vista Verde Way, Portola Valley, CA 94028 at 7:21 PM on October 4, 2024 at an elevation of approximately 300 feet. They appeared to be military aircraft.
2. Are you receiving threats of further coerced witness statements from your sons and MG today?
Answer: Yes, I am.
3. Has President Biden refused to release your sons and MG from the Pxxxxxx Program?
Answer: Yes, he has refused.
4. Your sons and MG have been faced with repeated visits from pairs of uniformed DoD officers demanding false witness statements from them in the name of "national security." Is that correct?
Answer: These are the allegations the FBI has made.
5. But in truth, isn't the issue that President Biden may have compromised himself within materials that are now due to you through the Freedom of Information Act? And further, isn't the issue that President Biden should never have authorized the forced "recruitment" of the sons of an FBI whistleblower with the intent of coercing false statements from them?
Answer: Those are two major issues, and there may well be more.
6. The President has apparently authorized the torture of your sons and MG, is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
7. Do you know the content of the latest false statements coerced from them?
Answer: The FBI claims that they have something to do with a "reactor," which I assume to be a nuclear reactor -- although who knows? But if the President is directing the FBI to make false claims about terrorism against my family, then that could correspond to a knowingly fake narrative created by corrupt law enforcement.
8. Hasn't the DoD also forced your sons to falsely testify to other crimes as well?
Answer: Yes, according to the FBI, they have been forced to lie about their childhoods as well as to extend false allegations pertaining to some form of "espionage."
9. And this may relate to IP that the FBI has itself misappropriated and sold?
Answer: Yes, it may.
10. And this crime may have been committed against two of your family members?
Answer: Three, if you include me.
11. Then, additionally, hasn't the FBI threatened to wrongfully implicate your family members of Pxxxxxx Program crimes?
Answer: Oh, yes. Many, many times.
12. So, we basically see a grab bag of false accusations, one more serious than the next, in a wide array of areas that would strain credulity even on the face of it. What is the likelihood that one person would ever be involved in the commission of so many unrelated serious crimes?
Answer: The chances of that are almost zero. I would venture to guess that it has never happened.
13. The FBI has appeared to suggest that ten people have been listed as primary "targets" of the agency because of what they know about certain malfeasance.
Answer: Yes, it has. The agency has repeatedly claimed that there are ten.
14. Do you know who they are?
Answer: I believe that five of them are members of my family. I believe that three of them are investigators. And I believe that one of them is referred to as an "accountant," -- someone who provided detailed financial information to the Supreme Court regarding my case.
15. Who is the tenth person?
Answer: There may be someone else within the DOJ who is aware of my case and attempting to ensure that it be handled according to the just application of the rule of law.
16. Did the FBI make a threat of "poisoning" the person identified by the agency as the "accountant" regarding this matter?
Answer: They did, and I hope it hasn't happened. Perhaps this dialogue will prevent it from happening.
17. Has this list of top "targets" been authorized by the President?
Answer: I would be shocked if that had not happened.
18. So what needs to be done to ensure the safety of investigators, the "accountant," an advocate within the DOJ, and your family members?
Answer: They need to document their experience in as much detail as they can, and they need to make others aware of that documentation on the chance that anything should happen to them. That's a reasonable insurance policy against harm.
19. How is your family doing in Yellowstone National Park this week?
Answer: The FBI appears to have alleged that they are experiencing dizziness due to wrongful Dxx deployment against them within the hotel. And I have received specific threats from the FBI pertaining to their travel throughout Other than that, I hope they are alright.
20. You will be providing their flight information to the OIG Hotline as soon as you receive it.
Answer: Yes, I will.
21. Will you please update us on their return home?
Answer: Of course I will.
Lane MacWilliams
Thursday, October 3, 2024
Documentation of Two New Email Communications to OIG Hotline and ODNI Investigators
OIG Hotline, please see two potentially important email communications sent to your attention this evening within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com with the following subject headings and date/time stamps:
- ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: State Collections Services May Possibly Be Delaying a Charge of $2250 to My Credit Card, sent at 7:31 PM today, October 3, 2024
- ATTN: OIG HOTLINE and ODNI Investigators Re: Audio Recording of Bank of America Call with Diane Addressing Possible Delay of State Collection Service Charge of Credit Card, October 3, 2024, sent at 7:44 PM on October 3, 2024
Wednesday, October 2, 2024
UPDATE: An Eminently Reasonable Question
UPDATE: Current photographs of air quality measures have been added below.
*********************************************************************************
1. You were told by the FBI that your sons have once again been threatened with death by DoD personnel directed from the highest level. And supposedly that was to coerce more false witness statements from them.
Answer: That is what I understand, yes.
2. The FBI even conveyed to you that your younger son lied to investigators about these allegations recently. Isn't that so?
Answer: It is, yes.
3. How could they manage to coerce him to lie in this setting?
Answer: The FBI alleges that the DoD gave my younger son a choice of poisoning his father, harming his brother, suffering a "staged suicide" by FBI affiliates, or defaming me through misreporting about his childhood to investigators.
4. None of those are particularly attractive options.
Answer: They are not.
5. Especially when we consider that your ability to combat falsified law enforcement reporting in any context is dependent upon your receipt of your FOIA reports and the investigative reports from the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.
Answer: Yes, this is the issue that the FBI is keenly aware of. These people will do anything not to be exposed. There are no limits for them. Murder of family members is just one more atrocity in the FBI's long list of atrocities. They are not going to be demonstrating restraint out of a sense of ethics.
6. Do you know the nature of the allegations?
Answer: The FBI alleges that Brandan Pesa, Tom Lyons and a third individual are once again directing false allegations of felony child abuse and industrial espionage. There are other allegations, no doubt, but those were the two the FBI chose to disclose.
7. But shouldn't the White House be immediately disallowing those knowingly false allegations?
Answer: They should.
8. Why isn't that happening?
Answer: You are asking an eminently reasonable question.
9. What are the motives for the White House to allow this false reporting, and perhaps even to direct it, in a manner that leaves you and your loved ones extremely vulnerable to harm?
Answer: Another eminently reasonable question.
10. Is there a financial incentive?
Answer: A third eminently rational question.
11. Is there a desire to evade criminal accountability due to the content of the FOIA materials and investigative reports in some regard?
Answer: A fourth.
12. Your sons have both denied in writing that they ever experienced child abuse at the hands of anyone as children. Isn't that so?
Answer: It is.
13. But for your younger son to lie about this -- what an agonizing position.
Answer: Both of my sons and MG have repeatedly experienced torture at the hands of the FBI and their affiliates. So, agonizing is the word.
14. Hasn't the FBI also suggested that Tom Lyons may have stolen IP from your younger son's company in order to sell it to a foreign adversary, just like they are alleged to have done with another family member?
Answer: Yes, this is supposed to be Tom Lyons' specialty. After he steals material and sells it to our foreign adversaries, then he goes about creating a trail of fake "evidence" with which to implicate the victims of his own crimes.
15. That sounds reflective of an extremely disordered psychology.
Answer: Yes, it does. It sounds psychopathic to those of us who have made somewhat of a study of human psychology.
16. Hasn't Tom Lyons taken a vow to uphold the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic?
Answer: He has. All FBI agents take that vow at the commencement of every new position within the agency.
17. What is your perspective about the FBI's claim that its knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting is a "national secret"?
Answer: It's not a secret when my family is being victimized by it. Once the FBI acknowledges its lies toward my family and stops engaging in damaging falsehoods that risk our lives, they can begin to speak to me about their "national security" concerns.
18. The FBI would likely defend itself in this moment by explaining that their directives are coming from above. Isn't that the case?
Answer: Look, I think when people make wrongful choices, they are always going to seek to distribute the blame to a larger circle coordinating defamation and harm. That doesn't render these atrocities justifiable. There is no end that justifies these means -- no one's Bitcoin account -- no one's yacht. The government is destroying the most virtuous families it has. No ethical person will ever call that acceptable.
19. Do you find the specifics of this corruption infuriating?
Answer: You know, I think appalling is a better word. There are many aspects of the government's atrocities that I have not disclosed, and for good reason. But the FBI has in every way imaginable abused my reticence and restraint. The wisdom and insight just are not present in the leadership of the agency. At all. And obviously, other branches of the government are struggling mightily with this challenge to democratic fundamentals.
20. No one has yet provided you with FOIA materials or investigative reports, your neighbor continues to install autonomous devices of harm, yesterday you were suffering from sky-high radiation exposures based on yet different false reporting. Now, you're being told that the CIA has extended an assassination contract to the mafia through a black budget, and you probably only have until the election to try to find a way for your family and yourself to survive. Are there any other environmental harms going on right now?
Answer: I am receiving repeated threats of toxin and chemical exposures to all of my family members, MG and myself. And the interior air quality at my residence is extremely poor at this time, yet again.
21. Can you give us specifics about this latest environmental harm?
Answer: Yes, here is the latest reading of small and large particulates on my interior Dylos gauge:
Small particulates are 6136 and large particulates are 5212 -- both indicative of extremely poor air quality, to the extent that the lungs are being damaged.
22. Can you feel that damage taking place?
Answer: Oh, yes. The lungs and the throat burn quite severely under these circumstances.
23. Has the FBI ever apologized for this aggression? Has anyone ever offered to assist you in healing?
Answer: Oh, no. That has not happened. We have just had increasing encounters with the so-called "exxxxxxxxx protocol."
24. Those words are so offensive in and of themselves.
Answer: Yes, they are. They speak of human atrocities and those who feel all-too-comfortable in perpetrating them.
25. You spent a great deal of time on the phone today attempting to resolve a billing issue. Yet this evening, the FBI cut your Wifi while threatening an unjustified law enforcement raid based on AI-generated audio of those calls. In other words, falsified audio of those calls was created quite rapidly.
Answer: Yes, it was. On one occasion, a customer service representative went silent for a full fifteen seconds, which was highly unusual. But later, I realized that this type of blank in the conversation greatly assists the FBI and its affiliates in dropping in dialogue that never occurred. They still can make use of the same background static sounds on the call -- which supports the credibility of the falsifications a great deal. But people need to realize that falsified audio can be used to justify first-degree murder on the part of the FBI. So, these circumstances are extremely serious.
26. You have been told that you are actually now at the top of the Democrats' "hit list." Isn't that true? At the very top? How could that possibly be?
Answer: Because President Biden and quite a few others have wrongfully invaded funds awarded through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI in my name. And so there is a terror of accountability over those crimes, I'm sure. And the fact that the financial misappropriations have occurred simultaneously with first-degree murder attempts toward my family members, MG and myself just renders the whole situation that much more heinous.
27. When you reference the "third individual" above, are you talking about President Biden?
Answer: I actually am.
28. President Biden knows Brandan Pesa and Tom Lyons quite well, evidently, and has allegedly utilized them to plan many unspeakable harms against your family members and yourself.
Answer: This is what the FBI appears to convey.
29. And then today, you were under immense pressure to disclose your impressions of the Vice Presidential debate. Why didn't you do so?
Answer: Because I believe that the Freedom of Information Act was written for Democrats and Republicans, alike. And I believe that the Constitution was written for all Americans, not merely those with certain political affiliations. So, it's wrong for our leaders to politicize this situation when the decisions they make at this time will have such profound implications for the freedom of all of mankind in the future.
30. If it is true that you and your family members are currently at the top of the Democrats' "hit list," who will protect you and your family members, including MG?
Answer: I don't know. I hope that writing about this situation publicly can help to defend us, but I don't know. I hope that all good people everywhere will defend us. But they need to learn about our plight first.
31. What do you make of the FBI's assertion that you are once again being exposed to Paraquat, chloropicrine and other lung-damaging agents within your own home?
Answer: My lungs certainly feel like this is the damage being done at this time. I just cannot support the use of torture toward highly honorable whistleblowers and their families, and I don't believe that President Biden should be supporting it either.
32. Given that President Biden has unethically conscripted your sons and MG into a program you have previously named for investigators, are you concerned for your family's safety this week?
Answer: Very concerned. If my younger son is lying to investigators, as the FBI said he did, then he is genuinely frightened. And he's a brave fellow overall. So the circumstance would have to be extreme in order for him to lie to investigators about his childhood, or about his parents' honor and lawfulness.
33. Will you please keep us updated on your family's well-being and your own under these arduous circumstances?
Answer: Of course I will.
34. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?
Answer: Yes, I do.
Lane MacWilliams
Accounts Paid in Full
OIG Hotline, I have now paid my Stanford Medicine account four times over, with two payments to Stanford (one by credit card paid by my husband on September 30, 2024 and one paid by electronic funds transfer from my bank account on October 1, 2024), and two payments to State Collection Service (one through electronic funds transfer from my bank account on October 2, 2024 and one through my credit card, which I activated expressly to make this payment, also on October 2, 2024), due to the fact that the FBI extended so many threats of false claims concerning non-payment.
After all of that effort, the FBI had the temerity to suggest that it would now allege that I was behaving irrationally.
One has to have a sense of humor about predators within the FBI, it would seem.
I will be sending you recordings of all conversations pertaining to this matter in order to document the often conflicting and contradictory information that Stanford Medicine, State Collections Service (a Stanford "in-house" contractor), and Bank of American provided to me.
I hope this matter is now resolved. I will be checking my credit card daily to ensure that the FBI does not engage in further tampering with my accounts, which was the cause of my locking all of my credit cards recently.
I must say that the quadruple effort this required may be reflective of the friction and grief the FBI's predations are currently causing to the larger society.
One would hope that we can improve the foundations of trust and good faith within the United States, despite the FBI's apparent efforts to divide, disrupt and discredit the honorable activities of virtuous Americans.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
**********************************************************************************
OIG Hotline, please be apprised that both Stanford Medicine and and State Collection Services have stated to me that my account was wrongfully linked to my older son's account, and that this was the reason for the additional charges. Both Stanford Medicine and State Collections Services have de-linked these accounts and both of them have accepted full payment for both my own outstanding charges and my older son's outstanding charges. Stanford currently shows an overpayment of my account, and I have double paid the statement balances on my son's accounts through Stanford and State Collection Services as well in order to ensure that these accounts are cleared with a zero balance.
My payment through electronic funds transfer of $2550.39 to Stanford Medicine has already been withdrawn from my bank account, so the FBI cannot argue that I am in arrears on any medical billing at this time, except through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting or corruption of my accounts.
I will be forwarding to you audio recordings of the associated phone calls today.
Thank you very much for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office and, by extension, the ODNI. I would respectfully request that you forward all information to them promptly.
Most gratefully,
Lane MacWilliams
Important Documentation for the OIG Hotline, October 2, 2024
OIG Hotline, please access this original email with attachments sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 2:48 AM on October 2, 2024.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
Tuesday, October 1, 2024
Important Documentation for the OIG Hotline
OIG Hotline, please access an audio recording of my husband's payment of $3079.09 pertaining to a Stanford Medicine bill for care within the Emergency Department on April 26/27, 2024.
This communication was sent to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com on October 1, 2024 at 6:49 PM.
Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
Statement of Appeal, October 1, 2024
OIG Hotline, please accept this Statement of Appeal, dated October 1, 2024.
The FBI has appeared to allege that the agency has forged one or more affidavits or statements utilizing my name, my signature, my voice or my image.
This must be the explanation for renewed aggression at the Hyver's property, in addition to highly elevated ionizing radiation within my home (please see below), extremely poor air quality interior to my home, and elevated radon -- all of which appear to be caused by the FBI or its affiliates on the basis of knowingly falsified documentation.
Clearly, without open communication with investigators and attorneys representing my case, I remain at a profound disadvantage with regard to the FBI's perpetration of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.
The FBI is capable of forging documents and handwriting, creating fake photos, producing AI-generated video co-opting my image and AI-generated audio co-opting my voice, coercing falsified witness statements, falsifying location information, and the list goes on.
When I no longer am protected by my Constitutional right to examine false accusations regarding my conduct, I have very little opportunity to defend my own life and the lives of my family members.
When Court processes are conducted in secret, without my ability to face my accusers and learn of the falsehoods they are extending, the potential for unjustified harm perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates becomes almost unlimited.
This document is to confirm that none of my affidavits or witness statements ever disclosed any unlawful or dishonorable activity, communications, conduct or intention on my part for the simple reason that I never engaged in any of these.
All of my actions, communications, conduct and intentions continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form. (This is confirmed daily within my Wifi access log, so this documentation is readily available within my gmail account on a regularly updated basis.)
I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully and categorically false.
I will observe that this morning I viewed an autonomous sniper device for the first time, ready to be installed at my neighbor's property. Given that I am a highly honorable person who is endeavoring to support the Constitutional freedoms of the American electorate, this was a shocking experience.
It appears clear to me that my FOIA reports and investigative reports of the OIG Hotline and the ODNI must be conveyed to me on an urgent basis, or my family members and I cannot survive this ordeal.
Can the Court now please reinstate all Orders for Injunctive Relief extended in my favor, ensuring that reports be conveyed to me immediately?
Can a Stay against additional false claims please be enforced?
I respectfully request advocacy regarding my family members' fundamental safety and my own, none of which can be supported without the immediate provision of reports as approved directly by the Honorable Justice originally granting my petitions for injunctive relief.
Please file an appeal based on this statement on an immediate basis, while still preserving Orders for Injunctive Relief in my favor, so that my family members' lives and my own can be preserved.
Thank you for your urgent intervention in this matter.
Most respectfully.
Lane MacWilliams
Ionizing radiation measures within my home on October 1, 2024:
Letter to My Sons, October 1, 2024
OIG Hotline, please be aware that neither one of my sons responded to my request for communication if they believed there was any way in which I had ever violated the law.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
*******************************************************************************
Gxxxxx and Dxxxxx, sweethearts, the FBI has appeared to suggest that the extremely elevated radiation exposures I am currently suffering within our home have been justified on the basis of falsified witness statements coerced from both of you under threat of death by your handlers and the DoD, and authorized at a high level.
This is further to reconfirm that all of my activities, communications, conduct, intentions, subscriptions, purchases, and viewing of videos/films on any platform have been and continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form. This is further to confirm that my husband and I possess no firearms and have no intention of possessing, purchasing or acquiring any firearms. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I have caused elevated radiation of any kind within our home or anywhere else. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I possess any secret codes for any purpose (nor do we know of anyone who does), though we do have ostensibly private passwords for Gmail and other perfectly lawful and honorable online access. Specifically, this is further to confirm all of my previous statements regarding the trash and recycling of my husband and myself. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I are Communists, Socialists or radicals, nor are we in any manner sympathetic to Communist, Socialist or radical ideology. Beyond this, our aversion to Communism, Socialism and radicalism has always been true and will continue to be so. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I wish to overthrow the government. This is further to confirm that we are not shoplifters, thieves, plagiarists, adulterers, predators of any kind, spies of any kind, terrorists of any kind, illegal or prescription substance abusers of any kind, alcoholics, human traffickers, or drug traffickers. This is further to confirm that my husband remains my sole intimate partner over my lifetime. This is further to confirm that neither I nor my husband have extended threats to anyone or sent hate mail to anyone. This is further to confirm that neither I nor my family have any knowledge, codes, plans, communications, serial numbers, or any information whatsoever concerning "reactors," nor do we know anyone who does. Further, this is to confirm that my husband and I are both peaceable people, committed to the rule of law and honorable engagement with all others at all times. We have always endeavored to help and support all those we encounter, and have assiduously and conscientiously avoided causing harm to anyone. This is further to confirm that all of my conduct has been and continues to be honorable and law-abiding. Finally, this is to confirm that my husband and I have exercised the highest ethics and standards of conduct in our professional lives, as well as our personal lives.
I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully, and categorically false.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
Expanded Reconfirmation of Previous Statements
OIG Hotline, the FBI, a short while ago, appeared to confess to false allegations toward my family members and/or myself through a Spotify title consisting simply of "Reactor," included herewith:
This is further to reconfirm that all of my activities, communications, conduct, intentions, subscriptions, purchases, and viewing of videos/films on any platform have been and continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form. This is further to confirm that my husband and I possess no firearms and have no intention of possessing, purchasing or acquiring any firearms. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I have caused elevated radiation of any kind within our home or anywhere else. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I possess any secret codes for any purpose (nor do we know of anyone who does), though we do have ostensibly private passwords for Gmail and other perfectly lawful and honorable online access. Specifically, this is further to confirm all of my previous statements regarding the trash and recycling of my husband and myself. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I are Communists, Socialists or radicals, nor are we in any manner sympathetic to Communist, Socialist or radical ideology. Beyond this, our aversion to Communism, Socialism and radicalism has always been true and will continue to be so. This is further to confirm that neither my husband nor I wish to overthrow the government. This is further to confirm that we are not shoplifters, thieves, plagiarists, adulterers, predators of any kind, spies of any kind, terrorists of any kind, illegal or prescription substance abusers of any kind, alcoholics, human traffickers, or drug traffickers. This is further to confirm that my husband remains my sole intimate partner over my lifetime. This is further to confirm that neither I nor my husband have extended threats to anyone or sent hate mail to anyone. This is further to confirm that neither I nor my family have any knowledge, codes, plans, communications, serial numbers, or any information whatsoever concerning "reactors," nor do we know anyone who does. Further, this is to confirm that my husband and I are both peaceable people, committed to the rule of law and honorable engagement with all others at all times. We have always endeavored to help and support all those we encounter, and have assiduously and conscientiously avoided causing harm to anyone. This is further to confirm that all of my conduct has been and continues to be honorable and law-abiding. Finally, this is to confirm that my husband and I have exercised the highest ethics and standards of conduct in our professional lives, as well as our personal lives.
I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully, and categorically false.
I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
Request for Injunctive Relief, Part #20, October 1, 2024
OIG Hotline, I would normally render the following communication confidential, but, given the extreme and verified nature of these threats, I am unable to do so.
I respectfully request assistance in ensuring that no further harms are ordered toward my loved ones or myself in retaliation for my serving as a whistleblower of FBI malfeasance in the form of the agency's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.
I need to be able to move to a safe residence, but I cannot do so until the President chooses a lawful and honorable course of action regarding this matter.
Unfortunately, that lawful and honorable course is not in evidence at this time.
Please allow me to express my gratitude to those who are vigorously defending my family members' safety and my own under these extraordinary circumstances.
Most respectfully,
Lane MacWilliams
Monday, September 30, 2024
Statement of Appeal, 7:57 PM on Monday, September 30, 2024
OIG Hotline, my ability to create a new blog post is being blocked at this time.
The FBI appears to allege that there has been a judicial order for my harm this evening based on the FBI's argument that my disclosures regarding the FBI"s corruption of the public utilities, together with the revelations of the FBI's unconstitutional Dxx deployment against the law-abiding American public constitute "a major leak."
The agency appears to further allege that an assault toward me of some kind has been permitted in a judicial setting based on this argument. I respectfully request an immediate appeal of this ruling, without endangering injunctive relief that has already been extended in my favor.
My communications about the issues described above have not been widely distributed.
Rather, I have sought to communicate with the OIG Hotline and the Court in addressing whether these issues are Constitutional and lawful, both of which I highly doubt.
If the public is disallowed from describing to investigators and the Court the means by the which corrupt branches of the government are attempting to take their lives, then being a "good citizen" takes on the definition of simply dying on time without complaint.
What would the founders of our nation have to say about this?
How is our national security served by programs which prey upon the honorable public with the wrongful justification of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting?
This is totalitarianism writ large.
The public is decidedly unsafe with the FBI's "target of interest" program in active maintenance and expansion.
The Court can decide whether the FBI's right to concealment of its atrocities outweighs the public's right to preserve their own lives and those of their loved ones.
But I don't think I should be rendered brain damaged or dying from DEW deployment, nor should my loved ones, because the FBI is horrified by the prospect of its accountability before the American public as a whole.
I respectfully request vigorous defense in this circumstance, with the preservation of previous injunctive relief orders extended in my favor by the Court.
With appreciation for prompt intervention in this matter,
Lane MacWilliams
*******************************************************************************
Courage, Character and Integrity
OIG Hotline, my Wifi was interrupted while I was working on a "question and answer" essay from 5:40 PM to 5:57 PM today, September 30, 2024. I did not engage in communications with anyone during that time. I did not leave my home during that time.
I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully and categorically false.
Instead, I dictated my thoughts into a recording device. Particulates are currently elevated within my home, as is radon, indicating to me that knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting has not been disqualified. The result of this is that I and my family members are vulnerable to additional and unwarranted harms.
So, if an executive order of harm has been extended regarding my loved ones and/or me, I would ask that it be immediately rescinded.
If a judicial order of harm has been extended regarding my loved ones and/or me, I would ask that it be immediately challenged.
I am highly aware that the DoD feels that a "major leak" has occurred with regard to both the corruption of utilities companies and the deployment of Dxxs against the law-abiding American public.
But my blog is read by a handful of people who are aware of this situation already.
And my emails to my own account on these subjects are marked as confidential.
So, I expect to be treated with respect by the White House and the Congress in this circumstance. And I expect threats of sniper assault, Dxx assault, bomb deployment, staged "landslide," "earthquake," "meteor fall," "sinkhole" or "geologic eruption," home invasion, kidnapping/murder, poisoning of my loved ones, "fall from a height" of my loved ones, staged drug overdose, arson, power outage, deadly illness, toxin and chemical exposure, additional harms to our foundational health, staged car accident, mafia hit and yet more harms to be withdrawn right away.
I would like to express my appreciation to the OIG Hotline and to others who have no doubt acted heroically in protecting our safety at this time.
Thank you for your courage, your character and your integrity.
Most gratefully,
Lane MacWilliams
Ongoing Defamation of a Whistleblower, Enforced by the DoD
1. The DoD has appeared to assert to the President that you have been the cause of a "major leak." To what subject does that pertain?
Answer: It may pertain to the FBI's utilization of the utility companies to harm law-abiding "targets of interest." And it may pertain to the FBI's wrongful deployment of Dxxs against the law-abiding American public.
2. These are overlapping subjects, in a way, because of the fact that Dxxs are so power-hungry. Isn't that true? So the deployment of Dxxs against the law-abiding American public always involves special arrangements through the electric companies involved. Isn't that the case?
Answer: It is, yes. And so, there are many questions surrounding these unconstitutional initiatives. Do we want the FBI to be deploying weapons of covert war against the honorable public on the basis of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting? Do we want the FBI to be co-opting monopolistic utilities companies to cause covert harm to large numbers of virtuous Americans? Isn't totalitarianism inevitable if these programs remain both widespread and concealed?
3. The truth is that you exposed the utilities companies' corruption to the OIG Hotline, and presumably from there to President Biden, a long time ago. What did you expect to happen when those revelations were made?
Answer: There should have been a press conference right away. There should have been major news coverage immediately. There should have been a DOJ initiative to investigate and address the unconstitutional programs that were being supported by Americans' tax dollars to cause them harm.
4. But none of that happened.
Answer: No, it did not.
5. Why didn't it occur?
Answer: You know, I think there was a fundamental failure of courage. I think it was viewed as a "big risk" to inform the public about the government's malfeasance in this realm. It's exceptionally difficult for any government to acknowledge its own atrocities, and I think that, ultimately, these revelations were used as bargaining chips behind the scenes, but there wasn't enough integrity to defend the interests of the public through honest disclosure.
6. What are your thoughts about that failure?
Answer: It's tragic. There was a historic opportunity to reclaim the freedom of mankind in this situation, where we are facing technologies that have raced far ahead of the public awareness. And there was simply a failure of character in the top leader.
7. You have sometimes said that leaders may find themselves in situations, when guiding the ship of state, in which there is a continuous cocktail party being hosted on the top deck. But that is illusory and it is the job of leaders to go below deck and find out how real people are experiencing their challenges and what kind of response they are receiving from their representative government to those challenges. Does that require a kind of determination to discover what is not immediately apparent on the surface?
Answer: I think we always need to be receptive to the possibility of hidden truths. Democracy and secrecy are diametrically opposed. So, if we care about the freedom of mankind, we need to care about programs that may be completely concealed from public scrutiny.
8. You are not suggesting that all of the FBI's concealed programs should be revealed to the public.
Answer: No, I am not. For many reasons, that is not possible. But I am suggesting that we need to closely attend to those programs which threaten the sovereignty, the safety, the Constitutional liberties, and the human rights of the electorate at large. Due to the emergence of AI and other rapidly advancing technologies, if we do not defend the freedom of mankind at this juncture, it will be lost. Human liberty will not find another chance. If we do not find a way to defend our most fundamental and cherished rights as Americans, they will not be defended.
9. If we do not find a way, no one will?
Answer: That is correct. We need to demonstrate great discernment and wisdom at this juncture, in respect for all who will come after us. Have we done all that we can do to illuminate this threat to individual sovereignty? I don't think we have.
10. What is your thought about the broad-based compromise of the utilities?
Answer: These are monopolistic entities. If you want power or water, you have only one choice in most cases as a member of the public. So, for harm to be meted out from these utilities toward the public is an appalling violation of the public trust. And if we fail to reclaim that trust now, when exactly will it be reclaimed? Who exactly will reclaim it for us? These are likely to be permanent structural changes to our society unless we find a way to talk about this. And it doesn't matter whether we are talking about a small town or a bustling metropolis. Future generations will want to be able to extend their trust to monopolistic utilities and to government institutions. Will we have made that possible for them?
11. You have been told that certain individuals are attempting to discredit your truthful testimony with false assertions about your mental health and stability. What is your response?
Answer: Was it ever thus? I realize that defamation can seem like the easiest way to avoid difficult disclosures for reluctant government institutions. That doesn't justify the defamation, however.
12. And supposedly your own sons are being forced by the DoD to sign knowingly false witness statements pertaining to your character and stability. May I have your response?
Answer: The DoD is threatening the lives of my sons if they don't comply, and those directives are coming straight from the Commander in Chief. So, there are enormous ethical problems and conflicts of interest present.
13. You have made the point that Navalny's children were never subjected to the torture your children and MG have experienced at the hands of this government.
Answer: This is true. Most nations have a sense of restraint surrounding the family members of whistleblowers. Most leaders understand that they will be roundly criticized for perpetrating this sort of crime against the innocent.
14. The FBI and CIA ordered your three young people, under threat of death, to violate the law in certain ways and then proceeded to justify their further defamation and harm with those violations. Isn't that true?
Answer: Yes, it is.
15. Your family is all vacationing at Yellowstone National Park this week, but you yourself will not be there. Why not?
Answer: I am still babysitting my documents, because I have had no contact from the government, despite repeated pleas for guidance with regard to the safe classification and disposition of that information.
16. You would not leave your documents alone at this point?
Answer: No. Absolutely not.
17. You view it as your responsibility to ensure that they are safely classified and given to the appropriate Office or receiver.
Answer: I do, yes.
18. Would you still like to see the government speak publicly about the issue of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting as perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates?
Answer: Emphatically yes. We need to know how the Presidential candidates feel about this issue and how they would address it if elected. And I think the perspectives of Congressional candidates are just as critical.
19. So much time has been wasted through the suppression of this information. Is there enough time to let the public know a portion of the realities so they can assess candidates on that basis?
Answer: I cannot say. But I feel deeply alarmed by the delays, the silence, and the aggression toward my loved ones and myself in response to this issue.
20. You still do not have FOIA materials or investigative materials from the OIG Hotline or the ODNI in your possession at this time?
Answer: No, I do not.
21. Will you please update us with regard to new developments regarding this issue?
Answer: Of course.
22. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?
Answer: Yes, I do.
Lane MacWilliams
Additional Information Pertaining to Emergency Petition for Injunctive Relief
OIG Hotline, please see additional information pertaining to my emergency petition for injunctive relief regarding the construction project at Ron and Rhonda Hyvers' home. This communication was sent to your Office's attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com at 2:29 PM Pacific time today, September 30, 2024.
In gratitude for any and all efforts to safeguard my family,
Lane MacWilliams
EMERGENCY PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF PERTAINING TO RON AND RHONDA HYVER'S DXX INSTALLATION
OIG Hotline, this is to document that Ron (Ralph) and Rhonda Hyver are currently allowing the demolition of an 8 foot by 8 foot segment of their driveway by Bill Brown Construction. This segment of the driveway abuts a retaining wall with direct sightline access to our home at 45 Vista Verde Way.
Because the FBI has appeared to threaten that this work involves the installation of a powerful Dxx intended to cause physical harm to my husband and myself, I am hereby submitting an Emergency Petition for Injunctive Relief to halt this project.
Ron and Rhonda Hyver have an FBI handler who has previously spoken with me at my home to apologize for his actions as directed by his boss.
I would respectfully request that all communications between the Hyvers and the FBI and their affiliates regarding this project be aggregated and examined by the OIG Hotline and submitted to the Supreme Court.
Rhonda Hyver spoke with me a few moments ago in a disheveled state, barefoot, unshowered, unkempt and disoriented. She extended an assertion that her driveway is being demolished for drainage purposes, but no civil engineer would shore up a retaining wall by demolishing an 8 foot by 8 foot segment of the driveway above it. Rhonda appeared emotional and aggressive, stating that she could also demolish my driveway if she wished to do so. I encouraged Rhonda to remain calm and comfortable, as well as to feel free to ask me any questions at any time in an attempt to assist her.
It is noteworthy that Rhonda Hyver suggested that I had objected to her project involving tree removal last week, even though I had no contact with her about this issue whatsoever. It is also noteworthy that she suggested that there could be "a tunnel" from her property to mine, when I never mentioned any information about tunneling or undergrouond digging whatsoever. It appears clear that Rhonda Hyver has had regular updates on my communications with the OIG Hotline regarding numerous matters, and she appears to be slightly confused regarding the source of that information.
It is noteworthy as well that Rhonda Hyver threatened to contact my husband in a manner that was clearly scripted by her handler. Yet it is she who appeared to be disheveled and irrational in this circumstance. Her sweatpants were stained and her hair was unwashed. She appeared to be suffering from malodor resulting from a lack of personal hygiene. I will also observe that the Hyvers' recycling contents every week demonstrates an overflow of wine and alcohol bottles.
I would ask that Bill Brown Construction be directed to halt all work on the Hyvers' property until the conduct of the FBI and its affiliates regarding this project can be fully assessed by the OIG Hotline and the Court.
Jorge Ramirez is the on-site supervisor of this project, and his phone number is (408) 640-0873.
Mr. Ramirez lists the phone number of Bill Brown Construction as (408) 297-3637.
The area of the Hyvers' driveway which is being demolished currently appears to be in line with an underground power line or will involve the installation of an underground power line.
Dxxs are notoriously power-hungry devices. They require a tremendous amount of electricity in order to "project" energy at a distance.
It is greatly concerning to me that a project such as this one would have had to receive high-level authorization from the government. I believe this represents a profound conflict of interest for President Biden, given that the FBI has claimed that the President has previously invaded funds awarded in my name to the OIG Hotline and the ODNI through knowingly inaccurate claims extended for improper purposes.
I believe that President Biden should not be authorizing the installation of a deadly Dxx on my neighbor's property at this time or at any time.
To do so represents an attempted first-degree murder of an honorable whistleblower who is attempting to defend the democracy on behalf of the nation as a whole.
Ron and Rhonda Hyver's contact information is as follows: 650-529-1921, 650-868-1366 (Rhonda's cell), (650) 799-5298 (Ron/Ralph's cell). Their email is hyver@sbcglobal.net. Their address, nextdoor to ours, is 55 Vista Verde Way.
I need to emphasize that the Hyvers and their handler, as well as the FBI as a whole, and those who wrongfully authorized this action, bear joint and several liability for any and all harms incurred as a result of this intended installation.
Please assist me in halting this demolition on an immediate basis in order to preserve my husband's safety and my own.
To serve as a whistleblower of the FBI's predation against the law-abiding American public is certainly an immense challenge. But it ought not to be one that costs my family members their lives due to corruption in our government, in the FBI, or in my neighbor.
I will appreciate immediate intervention of our behalf in the form of an emergency order for injunctive relief.
Most gratefully,
Lane MacWilliams