UPDATE: Today, Thursday, July 14, 2022, I am in receipt of myriad threats which appear to be intended to coerce me into signing the settlement agreement extended by the neighbors and the attorneys involved in the matter described below. The threats imply that physical and/or career harms will come to my family members and myself if I refuse to settle at this time. The threatener is referencing everything from staged car crashes to sniper assaults to job loss. He is also referring to means of attack about which I know comparatively little, including HAARP and DEW technologies.
The viciousness, specificity, and volume of the threats on this particular subject are notable.
They are appearing on my Pegasus-hacked iPhone, sent by a presumed FBI contractor.
Given that neither attorney representing us has uttered a word of denial about the FBI's possible instigation of this lawsuit, and the neighbor has not taken the initiative to offer any denial of the possibility of fraud, I find these threats to indicate that the parties are seriously frightened at the prospect of accountability -- and probably none more urgently than the FBI itself, whose corruption in this matter, if it proves as present as it appears, would be quite egregious.
The settlement offer, if signed, would absolve everyone of legal liability for any circumstances pertaining to this lawsuit.
And so, the parties are quite desperate to achieve closure.
I'm interested in something else.
I'm interested in the truth.
Did the FBI compensate our neighbors to sue us over a spurious matter? And is this corruption part of the FBI's standard protocol of harassment toward "targets of interest"? And do Democrats and journalists represent the majority of those designated as "targets of interest"? And is the FBI perpetrating widespread falsified law enforcement reporting against law-abiding American citizens in order to place and keep them on the "target of interest" list?
I think most Americans would be interested in learning the answers to these questions.
I think our democracy requires those answers.
So, I'm holding the line.
*********************************************************************************
Part of the FBI's unconstitutional "target of interest" program appears to include FBI agents directing the neighbors of "targets of interest" to file spurious lawsuits against them regarding minor disputes. Apparently, Infragard compensates neighbors for their complicity, as well as attorneys on both sides of such legal actions. The longer term goals seem to include harassment, impoverishment and property divestment of "targets."
Our own neighbors, who, for the purposes of this post, I will anonymize as the "Millers," filed a strange lawsuit against my husband and me a couple of years ago -- strange because they blocked a drainage system, causing a minor landslide on their property, and then asked us to pay for the repairs. Mr. "Miller" refused to allow the insurance companies to settle the matter, despite repeated offers. Only after I began reporting to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. DOJ that I suspected this lawsuit of having been instigated by FBI personnel did Mr. "Miller" have a sudden change of heart and wish to settle!
In response to the settlement offer, I wrote the following letter to our own attorneys.
Is it surprising to anyone that these two men refuse to answer any questions as to whether they have been in ongoing communication with the FBI concerning this matter?
Given the ethics and legal violations inherent in attorneys accepting pay to undermine their own clients, I have the impression that these attorneys are panicked about the prospect of needing to explain themselves before the California Bar or a federal investigator.
Yet, this legal fraud and insurance fraud being perpetrated by FBI agents and affiliates merits full illumination, surely.
July 9, 2022
Dear Attorney xxxxx:
This represents a confidential communication and qualifies in all respects for attorney-client privilege under the regulations of the California State Bar. I authorize you to discuss its contents only with me by means that are direct and in writing.
My husband tells me that you have been a help to him in the defense of the Miller suit, and I extend my gratitude for your efforts.
I am in receipt of the proposed settlement of the Millers' lawsuit and the countersuit my husband filed under your advice, dated June 2, 2022.
My assessment of this settlement offer is predicated on your sworn answers, in writing and under penalty of perjury, to the following questions, in addition to questions I request that you arrange for opposing counsel to extend to Ms. Miller, also included herewith:
1. Have you engaged in any communication whatsoever with employees or affiliates of the FBI and/or Infragard concerning the Millers' legal actions?
2. Have you accepted compensation from the FBI and/or Infragard in return for your cooperation with the directives of FBI personnel in this matter?
3. Have you provided "witness statements" or the equivalent to the FBI concerning your interactions or others' interactions with my husband and/or myself?
4. Have you ascertained whether any such statements accompanied by your signatures were later falsified, and even notarized, in a process internal to the auspices of the FBI?
5. To your knowledge, is Lloyd's of London signatory to Infragard or to the UK's corollary to Infragard?
6. To your knowledge, has Lloyd's of London accepted any compensation from any source in return for its cooperation with the FBI or collaborating law enforcement personnel with regard to the Millers' legal actions?
7. To your knowledge, did Mr. and/or Ms. Miller accept compensation from Infragard to file suit in this matter at the express direction of the FBI or FBI affiliates?
8. To your knowledge, have any of the Millers' attorneys engaged in any communication whatsoever with the FBI and/or Infragard concerning the Millers' legal actions?
9. To your knowledge, have any of the Millers' attorneys accepted compensation from the FBI and/or Infragard in return for their cooperation with the directives of FBI personnel concerning the Millers' legal actions?
Your replies to the questions above should take the form of full sentences, with named, specified subjects and objects, and they should be provided to me as an attested affidavit.
Questions for Ms. Miller follow herewith. Her replies should take the form of a videotaped attested affidavit, with corresponding transcript provided to me.
1. Have you or your husband Mr. Miller engaged in any communication whatsoever with employees or affiliates of the FBI and/or Infragard concerning the legal actions you have undertaken in this matter?
2. If the answer is yes, when did those communications commence?
3. What has been their form and content?
4. Did you or your husband file suit against us at the express directive of the FBI and/or FBI affiliates?
5. Have you or your husband accepted compensation from the FBI and/or Infragard in return for your cooperation with the FBI or collaborating law enforcement personnel with regard to your legal actions?
6. How much compensation and in what form?
7. Have you or your husband engaged in other actions pertaining to us as your neighbors at the behest of FBI personnel or affiliates?
8. If so, what were those actions?
9. Were you compensated for those actions?
10. When did they occur?
11. To your knowledge, have any of your attorneys accepted compensation from the FBI and/or Infragard in return for their cooperation with the directives of FBI personnel concerning the legal actions in this matter?
12. To your knowledge, have your legal bills been waived, compensated, or reimbursed by the FBI and/or Infragard in the pursuit of your legal actions?
13. Have you ever expressed concerns to anyone regarding the legality of directives extended to you and/or your husband by the FBI?
14. What form did those communications take and what was their content?
Of course, I would like to resolve the legal matters initiated by the Millers. However, I can only do so with full and unfettered access to the truth concerning my queries above. I would appreciate your replies to these questions as soon as possible.
If you are unable to reply, and further, if Ms. Miller is unable to reply, I would observe that the Millers' original suit was almost certainly brought on a fraudulent basis. I would further observe that the Millers would have little choice but to retract it at this time.
In this case, all legal fees incurred by my husband and myself in this matter should be immediately reimbursed by you and Attorney xxxxxx.
If the FBI or its affiliates instigated the Millers' original lawsuit, any settlement extended by Lloyd's of London would constitute insurance fraud -- and I cannot ethically or legally consent to that crime.
If the Millers have committed fraud, and potentially other crimes, under directives from the FBI and/or its affiliates, this raises many questions concerning FBI malfeasance, currently being investigated by the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Beyond this, of course, there is also a concern regarding the preservation of attorney/client privilege and unbiased representation in the face of malfeasance knowingly perpetrated by FBI personnel.
Certainly, this would warrant thoughtful evaluation.
I will simply observe that good people can sometimes engage in wrongful, unethical, and even illegal actions if they become confused about the nature of authoritative directives being extended to them.
As you know, I stand as a whistleblower of corruption within several major FBI programs, the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the FBI's affiliated "target of interest" program among them. It appears that FBI agents are knowingly employing fake video, fake audio, false email, fake messaging, manipulated DNA "evidence", falsified witness testaments -- on and on -- in a large-scale perpetration of falsified law enforcement reporting for anti-democratic objectives. These actions stand in stark violation of the Constitution and the rule of law.
Democracy depends partly upon a society's determined commitment to uphold the truth, even, and perhaps especially, when individuals within that society are placed under duress. Your contribution to the truth of this matter is important, not only to us, but to many, many other Americans who are facing unlawful predation by the FBI and its affiliates.
Please be aware that any FBI personnel who have been in contact with you will direct you to destroy all records of their communications with you. It is important for you to understand that concealment of this kind protects criminal FBI agents, not you.
By contrast, you are protected by retaining full and complete documentation of your communications with the FBI and/or Infragard.
I look forward to your formal reply, Attorney xxxxx.
Please note that Attorney xxxxxx will receive a separate letter addressed to him, but otherwise bearing identical content.
Sincerely yours,
Lane MacWilliams
The above material was sent to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice in care of the OIP regarding our attorneys' apparent inability to deny serving as paid FBI informants in an active and ongoing legal matter, raising the specter of legal and ethics violations concerning this case. This communication, with a fourteen-page attachment, was sent to the OIG H from lmacwilliams7417@gmail.com at 5:47 pm Pacific time, and to selected recipients within the OIP at 5:50 pm Pacific time, with copies forwarded to lanemacwilliams@gmail.com and lmacwilliams77419@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment