My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Wednesday, September 21, 2022

Library of Congress: A "Reservoir" of Disinformation for the American Far Right?

1.  You received some messages from your stalker this morning pertaining to the Library of Congress.

Answer:  Yes, I did.

2.  What did they consist of?

Answer:  They seemed to contain assertions that fake messaging, fake emails, fake diary entries, and compromising photographs and/or films had been placed within the Library of Congress by far right affiliates of the FBI for the purposes of facilitating slander and defamation toward me in the future.

3.  Do you know of any nude photographs with you as the subject?

Answer:  Absolutely not.

4.  Did you ever consent to compromising photographs or films with you as the subject?

Answer:  Absolutely not.

5.  You have had how many lifetime intimate partners?

Answer:  One.  

6.  And who is that?

Answer:  My wonderful husband of 32 years.

7. Did you ever grant law enforcement the right to enter your home for the purposes of surveilling you at will?

Answer:  Never.

8.  Did you ever break the law, giving justification to law enforcement to surveil, harass and harm you?

Answer:  In no way, shape or form.

9.  Did your family members ever break the law, giving justification to law enforcement to surveil, harass and harm your family members or you yourself?

Answer:  Never.

10.  Did you ever grant the FBI the right to slander and defame you?

Answer:  Never.

11.  Yet, you suspect they have perpetrated these crimes against you and your husband in an extensive and ongoing manner?

Answer:  I do.

12.  Do you know the manner in which the Library of Congress has been co-opted to serve the defamatory aims of far right personnel within the FBI in this case?

Answer:  I do not.  I only know that my stalker has repeatedly indicated that "clerks" have been bribed in order to place defamatory material within the Library of Congress at the direction of the FBI.

13.  Why do you think the FBI is working so hard to establish "reservoirs" of defamatory information concerning you, one of them appearing to be the Library of Congress?

Answer:  It seems that one of the primary means the FBI has of controlling "targets" resides in the agency's attempt to publicly shame them.  This is reflective of the Russian approach to totalitarianism, which makes liberal use of "kompromat."  I stand as a whistleblower of extensive corruption of the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative and the FBI's "target of interest" program.  The agency leadership is frightened enough at this point that it seems there is a concerted effort to discredit my truthful testimony regarding the unlawful actions of far right personnel within FBI ranks.

14.  Who do you think should be ashamed in this situation?

Answer: Far right personnel within the FBI and their far right affiliates. I think the American people would feel that it is wrong for the FBI to invade the bedroom of a loving, long-married couple in order to film their intimacy.  Further, I think the American people would be horrified by the actions of agency personnel in distributing such depictions online and elsewhere.  The shame clearly belongs to those within federal law enforcement who are perpetrating these crimes against the law-abiding American public.

15.  Do you think slander and defamation represent the worst of the FBI's crimes against "targets of interest"?

Answer:  I do not.  I suspect the FBI's predations, all of which the FBI attempts to justify through falsified law enforcement reporting, far exceed slander and defamation.

16.  How can the FBI's threat to our democracy best be faced?

Answer:  With courage.  Abundant courage.  Abiding courage.  Unwavering courage.

************************************************************************************

At the end of my posts regarding the unlawful actions of far-right personnel within the FBI, I will be adding the following statement.  The FBI is a deeply divided agency.  There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment.  The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general.  The safety of FBI agents should be protected, just as the safety of the American citizenry should be protected.  As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance.  The rule of law must always be honored and upheld.  It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of ALL AMERICANS that renders the United States a democracy.  We must never abandon this promise.  All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.


No comments:

Post a Comment