Protecting the Sovereignty Interests of Our Nation

 OIG Hotline, I am working on a Trust into which settlements and awards extended in my name and/or connected to my identity through the OIG Hotline and U.S. DOJ are to be placed on an immediate basis.

I do not believe that a foundation is possible in this instance because of the fact that I am advocating for long term policy changes that may result -- and in fact already have resulted -- in the initiative or establishment of new government rules, regulations, legislation and/or Constitutional amendments.

Because there seems to be a focused effort on the part of Txx Lxxxx and his FBI cohort at this time to falsely accuse me of wrongdoing, bias, espionage, terrorism, human trafficking, predation, abuse and/or capital crimes, all with the apparent intention of wrongfully taking my life for the purpose of profiteering from accounts connected to my name and/or identity within the U.S. DOJ, I ask that my accounts be maintained as locked and inaccessible to invasion by all comers until such time as the funds can be appropriately protected within the Trust created for this purpose.

This process should not take longer than several days, certainly.

In the meantime, I should not be receiving threats that my younger son was forcibly overdosed with Fentanyl recently, that he was given a stroke by Txx Lxxxx, that Txx Lxxxx is encouraging his suicide in the name of "patriotism," that there are further efforts to cause damage to his cognition and memory through Dxx deployment during night or day, that he is being threatened with staged car or plane "accident," or that he has been forced by the DoD to sign false witness statements alleging a "captive" of some kind, held within our home during his childhood.  

(What kind of disordered mind comes up with these horrors?  Has Txx Lxxxx perpetrated these atrocities?  Have his friends?  What kind of human being would be imagining these scenarios?)

I should not be prevented by Txx Lxxxx from speaking to my younger son to ascertain his state of health.  

I should not be receiving threats that my older son was asked to meet with an attorney today to attest to a parallel set of falsehoods to those forcibly required of his younger brother.

I should not be receiving threats that one of my sons could be directed by his handler to perpetrate a "public shooting," to meet with a train "accident," to fall off a roof, that my family members could be paralyzed, further brain damaged, kidnapped, maimed, or any other horror the FBI cares to extend.

I should be assured that President Trump, Vice President Vance, and Secretary Pete Hegseth care enough about this nation to protect my family members, my pets and myself from any further harm whatsoever.

Until those promises and directly and honorably extended, I appreciate your efforts to assist me in my ongoing advocacy for the long term sovereignty of our nation and our people by protecting all funds awarded to my name and/or identity connected to this case.

Thank you for your critical support.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Surrender of Badge and Title

 OIG Hotline, please be informed that two days ago I received a threat that, at Txx Lxxxx' directive, my unspecified belongings were being harmed in some manner.  Yesterday, the right sole of a pair of non-slip winter boots I purchased recently was leaking through the ball of the foot due to a piercing of the rubber sole that was difficult, though not impossible, to locate.

It is alleged that this sabotage was intended to force me to throw away the boots -- a reasonable conclusion, as that had been my plan.

Having said that, the discarded boots were allegedly intended to be utilized by Txx Lxxxx to stage a crime scene in which I was -- obviously -- to have no involvement whatsoever.

It is alleged that this FBI conduct was intended to "link" me to crimes committed or directed by Txx Lxxxx pertaining to one or more of my properties within the United States.

To say that I am alarmed by this ongoing attempt by Txx Lxxxx to frame me for his own crimes is the understatement of the millenium.  Clearly, this man must be feeling appreciable guilt in order for him to continue to attempt to project his predations onto the innocent.

Yet, should he really be allowed to continue to address his palpable guilt in this manner?

Shouldn't he be stopped before he hurts more innocent people?

Shouldn't he be charged right away?  Relieved of his duties?  Required to surrender his badge and his title?

Shouldn't he be further prevented from engaging in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting regarding my family members and myself?

Thank you for allowing me to express these serious concerns.

While I am relieved that Txx Lxxxx' check forgery scheme appears to have been detected, I hope we can agree that this does not represent the least of this man's crimes, nor the worst of his intentions.

Good people must stop the gratuitous predations of predators of this sort, or we will lose the most noble, honorable, virtuous Americans to the manipulations of Machiavellian and sadistic officials seeking to profiteer from the victims of their torturous aims and methods.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Alleged Attempt at Misappropriation of Funds by the FBI's Txx Lxxxx

 1.  There is an allegation that Txx Lxxxx claimed further false accusations against you and your family members before the Supreme Court recently with a view toward opening your accounts and misappropriating funds.  Did you make any donations to anyone recently?

Answer:  I did not.  

2.  Did you make any donations through ActBlue recently?

Answer:  No.

3.  Did you send any checks to any political figures?

Answer:  No.

4.  Did the FBI steal your check to the Stanford University Women's Club for the purpose of forging checks in your name?

Answer:  This stands as an unverified allegation of the FBI.  I simply do not yet have proof that the FBI committed this crime.

5.  May we see voided checks to political officials -- those which you decided not to send because of the fact that your funds must represent the human rights of all Americans and not just some?

Answer:  I forwarded a screenshot of five voided checks to the OIG Hotline at 2:14 PM this afternoon.

6.  Should your accounts remain locked in every regard at this time?

Answer:  Yes, funds may be added, but they should not be withdrawn from these accounts.

7.  Why is this so critical?

Answer:  So that the enemies of human sovereignty do not aggregate further power that cannot be countered in the future.

8.  You have not created a foundation in which these funds can reside.  Why not?

Answer:  Because I will be advocating for certain Constitutional amendments and legislation relating to my case, in which case a foundation would stand in violation of federal tax rules.

9.  Can you create a Trust that would receive those funds, and from which misappropriations could not be made?

Answer:  I can, and I think this is a necessity.

10.  In the meantime, can the DOJ and the Supreme Court reject all demands for the misappropriation of those funds?

Answer:  They can and they must, yes.

11.  What should happen to Txx Lxxxx regarding this attempt, if it is borne out by the facts of what has transpired?

Answer:  You know, this man is not going to stop behaving in knowingly criminal ways.  His history is violent, predatory, abusive and avaricious in the extreme.  And that is simply not going to change until and unless we insist that he step down from any and all aspects of responsibility regarding this case in the future.

12.  Should he face criminal charges?

Answer:  The DOJ needs to address this question, knowing that they could be accountable to the American people in the long term regarding their evaluation of this matter.

13.  Please continue to keep us updated regarding this concern.

Answer:  I will.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

When the First Amendment Is Paused By the Pentagon

 1.  The New York Times is suing the Pentagon with regard to First Amendment restrictions at this time.  What are your thoughts on the current situation?

Answer:  The Pentagon finds itself between a rock and a hard place, frankly.  There are critical factors that cannot be revealed to the American public at this time, and Pentagon staff members are trying to navigate the straits.

2.  Would it be to the American people's advantage to know more?

Answer:  It would have been to the American people's advantage to know more seventy years ago and during many administrations since that time.  Truman and Eisenhower and many others decided to keep critical secrets from the American public immediately following World War II, and we are dealing with the consequences of those choices today.  

3.  Do you accept that there will continue to be critical pieces of information the public simply cannot know into the indefinite future?

Answer:  If we accept that assertion, then we sacrifice human sovereignty, and national sovereignty along with it, in perpetuity.  So, no, I don't think we can say that the current gap in knowledge between governance and the governed can persist to the far horizon.

But the Pentagon is currently saying that there are subjects they are unable to address with journalists, and the public is not going to be receiving access to those sensitive issues at this time.

4.  Not in any measure?

Answer:  Not in any direct, confirmed or formal way, no.  

5.  Does the Pentagon find itself under threat regarding subjects about which the American public knows nothing at all?

Answer:  That is fair to say.  The Pentagon is attempting to do the best it can within a highly challenging framework.

6.  What would happen to a journalist who continued to speak about off-limits subjects, given these new guidelines from Pete Hegseth and others?

Answer:  He or she would not be able to persist.

7.  How long will this period of time last, when there are questions that journalists are simply unable to ask of the Pentagon?

Answer:  Two to three years at a minimum.  My point is that this time can be used to plan for the reclamation of our sovereignty, both national and individual, in ways that will protect mankind's greatest potential into the future.

8.  What are the most critical sovereignty issues as you see them today?

Answer:  We don't want the FBI's falsified law enforcement reporting to endure forever, nor the FBI's involvement in human trafficking, the FBI's limits on freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and, of course, ultimately, we don't want the FBI and its affiliates limiting a free press.  The subject of the architecture of free and fair elections will be critical as well.

We will need our military leaders to be setting environmental goals for the public in the long term, so that these issues can be de-politicized.

And we will need to define key elements of territorial integrity that involve open disclosure to the public on a whole range of subjects in the long term.

We will need to evaluate our energy policy with great rigor into the future, if we hope to maintain the fundamentals of our sovereignty.

And we will need to assess the myriad means of individual sovereignty violations by the FBI and its affiliates that are currently being deployed, and have the potential to derail all self-determination of the individual into the indefinite future.

This list is by no means complete, but it is a starting point for thorough assessment by someone who knows what the persistence of these programs would mean through direct experience.

9.  Why?

Answer:  It's fairly easy for most people to abandon someone else's sovereignty, without understanding the structural implications which will necessitate that they relinquish their own in short order.

We need an evaluation of the path forward by someone who understands how catastrophic such an abandonment of human sovereignty would be.

10.  Someone who has directly suffered from the FBI's programmatic violations of human sovereignty?

Answer:  Yes.  Such an individual will possess the appropriate insight into the challenges at hand, as well as they consequences of failure of governance should we continue to see programmatic expansion in the long term.

11.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Unique Biometrics of Lane MacWilliams

OIG Hotline, the following represents images taken by the Iris Galerie in Whistler, B.C.  My left eye shows a slight brown "birthmark" at the four o'clock position on the outer portion of the iris.  

My eyes have a  central brown starburst against a green-blue field.  "Central heterochromia," or an iris of two distinctly different colors, appears in less than 1% of the population.

There are a few "crowns," which appear as petals of a flower.  One can be seen at the four o'clock position, radiating from the starburst on the left eye, and at the nine o'clock position radiating from the starburst on the right eye.

If I had a twin sister, possessing my identical genetics from birth, her eyes would still demonstrate a different pattern from those details photographed herewith.

In this way, the iris serves as a unique biometric "fingerprint."  There may be ways of duplicating certain patterns with contact lenses that reflect an image.  But a person who is not wearing contact lenses will never exhibit the exact patterns shown below.

For the record, I have never worn contact lenses, and I do not plan to start.

Because the FBI has reportedly endeavored to impersonate me using nanotechnology advances, it is important to know that a person wearing a nanotechnology-based mask does not show normal physiological skin responses to pressure on the skin of the face.

Because certain other aspects of the eye can change slightly over time, I will be providing iris images to your Office on an ongoing basis.  Please note that I am not identifying all anomalies present within these photographs at this time.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Documented Will of Lane MacWilliams, December 2, 2025

 

Will Documentation

OIG Hotline, I will be witnessing and notarizing my Will tomorrow morning in Whistler, BC.

Because I am not categorized as a temporary resident in Canada, and because my assets are within the United States exclusively, I will be ensuring that my Will meets California legal standards for execution, in addition to British Columbia, Canada requirements.  The witnesses will also be signing Affidavits of Execution, in order to avoid being called to testify to their witnessing within the United States.

The Will's intent is to protect the lives and health of my loved ones and myself, alongside ensuring that the long term human rights of Americans are prioritized and substantively advanced by my case.  I hope it will have this effect.

I will be publishing my Will online in order to guarantee that its content is publicly available at this time.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

My Profound Thanks for Support from Both Sides of the Aisle

 OIG Hotline, because I am endeavoring to advocate for the human rights of all Americans, those of every race, creed, color, origin, orientation and political affiliation, I feel that it is inappropriate for me to make political contributions at this time.

Furthermore, it is important to clarify that my accounts maintained within the DOJ should remain locked at this point in order to ensure that funds intended for the preservation of the human rights of American citizens in the long term be safeguarded from invasion and/or misappropriation.

I believe that, just as many Democrats hope that knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates will not endure indefinitely, so, too, do many Republicans.

I believe that, just as many Democrats hope that the involvement of the FBI and its affiliates in the human trafficking of America's youth will not endure in perpetuity, so, too, do many Republicans.

I believe that, just as many Democrats hope that fundamental sovereignty violations of individual American citizens will not persist into the future, so, too, do many Republicans.

And I believe that President Trump and Vice President Vance are among those Republicans who stand with me in all of these concerns.

The attack on my younger son over the weekend was initiated by a specific individual, identified for your Office many times, within the FBI who appears to be most immediately implicated in crimes against my family.

It appears to have been his attempt to wrongfully suggest that this harm was initiated by others within elected office.

This simply was not the case.

And I need to express to all who hold high elected office, especially President Trump and Vice President Vance, to the Supreme Court, to the DOJ, and to the U.S. Congress, that I view most seriously the potential for my case to make a difference to the long term outcome of the sovereignty of the United States as a whole and the freedom of the American people.

It is heartbreaking to see one's children suffer torture by the FBI as a direct result of my advocacy for the human rights of our beloved family members, friends, and neighbors as Americans.

But this was the choice of one criminal actor within the FBI and his criminal affiliates within Russian organized crime within the United States.  Granted, these individuals wield appreciable power.  Still, I insist that they cannot traffic America's children with impunity, engage in egregiously falsified law enforcement reporting against honorable Americans, or violate the self-determination of our people in contempt for the public's sovereignty without our unified and unyielding reassertion of Americans' long term right to self-determination.

I believe that President Trump, Vice President Vance, and many others on both sides of the aisle are insisting on these points together with me, and for this support in this critical effort, I wish to extend my profound thanks.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Thanksgiving Reflections on the Character of Justice

 1.  What should happen to Txx Lxxxx as a direct result of his crimes against your family?

Answer:  Txx Lxxxx obviously feels under extreme threat, which is the reason he arranged with a long term rental management company to attempt to take my life this afternoon during a viewing of a rental property in Whistler, B.C.

Somebody needs to force this man to step down immediately, and that needs to be the first order of business.

Next, there needs to be a thorough evaluation of his criminal and civil liabilities to me.  

2.  Txx Lxxxx cannot continue in his current position?

Answer:  Absolutely not.  That is no longer a possibility.

3.  What should Txx Lxxxx' future employment prospects be in the federal government of the United States?

Answer:  Zero.

4.  What about his potential to run for elected office?

Answer:  After Txx Lxxxx gives back the funds he stole from accounts bearing my name and/or identity within the DOJ, he won't have the financial position to run for elected office.

On the basis of his crimes alone, this should be an impossibility.

5.  Should Txx Lxxxx be allowed to continue to communicate with anyone affiliated with the three-letter agencies?

Answer:  Decidedly not.  This should be absolutely prohibited.

6.  Should Txx Lxxxx be allowed to continue to communicate with your family members, directly or indirectly?

Answer:  That would be an emphatic no.

7.  Why can't Txx Lxxxx admit that he lied about you and your family regarding this case, and that he preyed upon all of you in the most unconscionable way?

Answer:  The short answer is that he would be disavowed if he admitted the truth of this matter.

The long answer is that Txx Lxxxx is gay, and the man who represents his lifetime unrequited love interest does not reciprocate his depth of feeling.  If Txx Lxxxx admitted his crimes in this case, he would be condemning his love interest, as well as other highly ranked officials.

So, that will not happen.

8.  Is Txx Lxxxx' life currently on the line because he has so embarrassed the FBI with his gratuitous crimes against your family?

Answer:  Knowing something about the FBI and its affiliates, I would be shocked if it weren't.

9.  You have been told that Txx Lxxxx cannot be formally prosecuted at this time.  But what does Txx Lxxxx owe you?  What does he owe your family?

Answer:  His remorse, his apology, his respect, his resignation, and his restitution consisting of all the funds he stole from accounts bearing my name and identity, along with further penalties.

10.  What happens when formal justice is not available to hold a man like Txx Lxxxx accountable?

Answer:  Then society must repudiate the man so that he understands that the crimes he has freely chosen to commit are unacceptable to everyone.

11.  Will you please keep us updated with regard to your family's safety and wellbeing, in addition to your own.

Answer:  I will be happy to do so.

12.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

To Save a Mockingbird, to Spare a Nation

 1.  After your younger son was ordered by the FBI to participate in an effort to frame you for crimes of which you know nothing, what happened next?

Answer:  I honestly have no details regarding the specifics of the crimes directed by the FBI's South Bay Chief of Station, Txx Lxxxx.

However, it was alleged that one or more of my properties was seriously affected by these crimes.

Much more concerning than the property issues was the alleged attempt on the life of my younger son once the frame was complete.

2.  Did Txx Lxxxx and the FBI attempt to take your younger son's life once they had coerced the participation they needed for the crime of framing you?

Answer:  Yes, they did.  No one wanted him to be able to report what he had been directed to do.

And, even now, he remains imperiled, as does my older son, as a result of wrongful directives extended to him during this scheme.

3.  Your older son has recently refused to sign a false witness statement pertaining to your family.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

4.  What happens when the DoD orders someone to sign a false witness statement and they refuse to do so?

Answer:  Typically, they are prioritized for first-degree murder by the FBI, whose personnel don't want them to tell the truth.

5.  First degree murder by the FBI and its affiliates?

Answer:  In this case, yes.

6.  And there have been threats of a shooting and of many other "accidents" toward your sons, yourself, and your other family members.

Answer:  Yes, there have.

7.  You measured dangerously high radiation levels of 205 CPMs in your hotel room this morning.  And there are threats of extremely high radon levels as well.  Isn't that the case?

Answer:  It is, yes.  And I would like to point out that, at 205 CPMs, the alarms are going off on the Geiger counter.  This is a level known to be hazardous to human health and to result in genetic damage and cancers within a short period of exposure.

8.  How could your hotel possibly defend exposing you to such extreme levels of ionizing radiation?

Answer:  You know, there is tremendous liability, obviously.  The FBI claims it has caused me a brain cancer due to previous unwarranted radiation exposures by the agency, and I have not been allowed to schedule an MRI.  

But for a hotel to collude in such cancer-causing initiatives is a very serious matter, indeed.

With regard to how it could be justified by the FBI, I will simply say that someone, almost certainly Txx Lxxxx, is making an argument that I represent a risk to national security.

9.  But that's not true, is it?

Answer:  No, it is not.  I may represent a risk to Txx Lxxxx' impunity, given that this man has persisted in wrongful claims against my family members and myself for years.

But throughout that ordeal, I have consistently demonstrated my loyalty to the nation.

10.  Why have you made that choice?

Answer:  Once again, I have done it because I am demonstrating the leadership which the American people deserve.

11.  Do you assume that your whole family is now being exposed to extremely elevated levels of radiation?

Answer:  I do.  I think this is a standard element of the "exxxxxxxxx protocol," and I think Txx Lxxxx is trying to erase his crimes against all of us through first-degree murder.

12.  What is the alternative?

Answer:  Txx Lxxxx either needs to acknowledge his crimes to me publicly, through the DOJ's prosecution of his conduct, or privately, through an attorney who is qualified to negotiate on his behalf.  At this point, I think that choice is mine to make.

13.  How do you think your younger son feels in knowing that there was a decided attempt on his life after his role in the attempt to frame you was complete?

Answer:  I'm assuming he comprehends how devastating a betrayal this represented against our whole family.  The intent from the beginning was, in accordance with the FBI's motto, to "disrupt, discredit and divide," but to do so within a scheme of first-degree murder and vast profiteering from accounts connected to my name and identity.

14.  How can this situation be made right at this point?

Answer:  I need to have outreach regarding the resolution of my concerns to date pertaining to this case.  The FBI and the CIA, along with their affiliate agencies, need to halt all aggression against my loved ones and myself, and that means that all radiation, Dxx deployment, non-conventional vectors of illness, and contamination initiatives need to cease without recommencing in the future.  

After that, I need security clearances and access regarding the history of these programs within the agencies, the engagement with certain concerns by the State Department, and the view of the Executive Branch, the U.S. Congress, the DOJ and the Supreme Court with regard to certain initiatives.  There is a great deal to learn, and I would like to be able to make substantive recommendations within a reasonable time period.

15.  Does the government feel that it is doing fine without wise guidance at this juncture?

Answer:  The government, respectfully, will benefit from more perceptive and far-reaching guidance of the depth I offer.

16.  What about Txx Lxxxx?  What should happen to him?

Answer:  He needs to withdraw his false claims on an immediate basis, and this is obvious.  There are those who appear to be recommending his retirement, but that alone does not satisfy my concerns in their entirety regarding this matter.  A high-level attorney should assist in this discussion, and right away.

17.  Txx Lxxxx has never apologized to you or to your family?

Answer:  Absolutely not.  This has never occurred, whether directly or indirectly.

18.  You have made the point that falsified law enforcement reporting is not necessary for the implementation of the FBI's mission and objectives.

Answer:  That's correct.  It is not necessary.  And for the FBI to create and aggregate a false dossier on every single American citizen, including minors, for the purpose of wielding totalitarian control over Americans for the foreseeable future will lead us -- should we not change course -- into a dystopia from which we cannot recover.

19.  And this is due to the concealed court processes that accompany those false dossiers?

Answer:  Quite so.  On the basis of the Patriot Act and the Espionage Act, individual Americans can lose their lives due to the FBI's false allegations, with no opportunity to know what they are accused of, or to defend themselves against false claims.

And it's the concealed nature of the false evidence and the accompanying judicial processes that render the honorable defense of the virtuous American citizen virtually impossible.

20.  You are advocating for the abandonment of falsified law enforcement reporting over the long term.

Answer:  Anyone who cares about the United States is now advocating for the abandonment of falsified law enforcement reporting over the long term.  And yes, I am foremost among them.

21.  In addition to the Pandora Program, the Particle Program, and the Prometheus Program, are there other programs about which the U.S. Supreme Court and the United States Congress currently needs to be fully informed?

Answer:  I would add the Genesis Program at this time.

22.  Will you please update us with regard to your safety and that of your family members, especially given the hazardous radiation levels you measured today?

Answer:  I will, and thank you for your concern for us.

23.  I appreciate your speaking with me this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

The Empty Frame

 

In this photo of my younger son's wedding rehearsal dinner, there are "frames" shown on the back left wall, and champagne celebrants shown on the back right wall.  I was unable to attend my son's wedding because of FBI threats of wrongful arrest.  This photo demonstrates the type of self-congratulatory symbolism with which the FBI likes to destroy American families.  The implication here is, "we are all celebrating the manner in which Txx Lxxxx has "framed" a loving and engaged parent for the profiteering of everyone else.

*********************************************************************************

1.  It is reported that President Trump invited your younger son to a dinner at the White House and then proceeded to explain to him that framing you, his mother, of crimes of which you know nothing would stand as a "patriotic act."  Is that your understanding?

Answer:  It is, unfortunately.  Yes.

2.  What are your thoughts about this conduct, please?

Answer:  You know, the FBI had already violated my younger son's sovereignty through myriad deployments of the Pandora Program, the Particle Program, the Prometheus Program and others.  So, he was not in charge of his own decision-making at that point.  Nor is he now.

So, to disable a young man in that manner, and then to direct him to lie about his own mother for profit, knowing that he would be unable to refuse -- these represent extremely serious crimes, obviously.

3.  Have you had outreach from an attorney regarding your case and its resolution according to your standards?

Answer:  Not as of this time, no.

4.  How would you evaluate current risks to your dogs and yourself, given current circumstances?

Answer:  I would assess them as quite high.  We are experiencing harassment every time I emerge from my hotel room, though my dogs are friendly to everyone and have not caused any harm whatsoever.  That said, I'm sure false witness statements are being coerced left and right.

5.  The FBI has appeared to suggest that you are to be harmed in some manner tomorrow as the result of one or more false witness statements from your sons, allegedly ordered by President Trump.  Is that your impression?

Answer:  The FBI is referencing the "billionaire boys' club," so yes, it seems as though attempts to frame me or frame my husband for crimes actually committed by Txx Lxxxx or directed by Txx Lxxxx continue unabated.

6.  What is the motive regarding such a crime of framing the innocent?

Answer:  Profiteering.  Pure and simple.  These men are seeking to misappropriate large sums awarded under my name through the auspices of the OIG Hotline, as they have allegedly done before.

7.  What do you make of apparent allegations that sums are now being awarded under Macwilliams, with a small "w," or Williams, in order to conceal the scheme from review by the Supreme Court and the United States Congress?

Answer:  It seems that these allegations likely represent genuine and intentional malfeasance in an attempt to evade detection by the Executive Branch.

8.  Wouldn't Pam Bondi have to be signing off on these schemes as well?

Answer:  Without question.  Yes, she would.

9.  You have stated recently that you would like to contribute to Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Cory Booker and Minority Whip Hakeem Jeffries.  Yet, you are being threatened that your checks will be diverted from Canada Post or the United States Postal Service.

Answer:  That is true.  I will need to photograph the checks and track the mailings, without question.

10.  The FBI appears to suggest that both of your sons require disability attorneys at this point because South Bay Chief of Station Txx Lxxxx has injured them both so seriously.

Answer:  That is the FBI's contention, and I'm sure it's true.  This is the reason I need to be involved in their treatment and recovery, and it is also the reason why no financial settlements whatsoever should be extended to them without my direct involvement.

11.  You have tried to continue to help the United States in every way possible, even while the FBI and its affiliates have been persisting in harming your family members and yourself in ways that the American public would no doubt consider an abomination.

Answer:  That's true.

12.  Why have you made this choice?

Answer:  The American people deserve the quality of leadership I am demonstrating.  That's why.

13.  What would be your response if President Trump's people reached out to you to address your case?

Answer:  I would certainly be interested to hear the perspectives of President Trump and his administration regarding my case.  One must always listen, and then one must evaluate the actions of all concerned.

14.  Your family needs healing at this time.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  It is, and I would add that healing is best supported by the truth spoken to one another.  In the absence of that reckoning, further harm is rendered highly likely.

15.  Will you please keep in close communication with us regarding the wellbeing of your family and your own health as well?

Answer:  Of course.  Thank you for your concern.

16.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

The Difficult Truth: Pressing Concerns Regarding the Defense of U.S. Sovereignty

 1.  What are your thoughts regarding the militarization of certain U.S. cities at the current time?

Answer:  There are concerns for the territorial integrity of the United States, in truth.  The militarization of certain urban areas allows for the planning of a more robust response to violations of our border integrity, and I'm not referencing the border with Mexico over and above others.

2.  Can you please be more specific?

Answer:  There is a tremendous problem right now regarding the manner in which the Chinese are utilizing container ships in Western ports:  San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Seattle, even Vancouver.

Containers are being used to transport people in significant numbers.  Further, there is a constant flow of illicit substances and even illegal weapons trafficking.

And the ports remain completely unregulated.

3.  We are not spot checking the contents of container ships?

Answer:  Not in any meaningful way, no.

4.  What are the risks?

Answer:  The Chinese may have plans to utilize unregulated ports to place Chinese military personnel within the territorial borders of the United States and other nations.  And these plans are likely coordinated with other foreign adversaries of the United States.

5.  Why are we allowing current inflows from the Chinese that run counter to the security interests of the United States?

Answer:  The Chinese have us in an economic bind due to the extent of U.S. bonds they own.  So they are regularly threatening to crash the bond market if we make moves to regulate the ports, and this is a type of ongoing extortion about which the American public remains uninformed.

6.  Are the ports a significant weak point for the United States?

Answer:  Highly significant.  Yes.  And the potentially catastrophic consequences of our continuing to allow the Chinese free control of the flow of people and goods through U.S. ports and the ports of our allies are foreseeable.

This is a sovereignty issue.  It cannot wait.

7.  What are parallel concerns at this time?

Answer:  Right now, there are not active plans to defend San Francisco in the event of a violation of territorial integrity.  And a combination of "natural" and "unnatural" disasters could easily result in large migration flows from this area.

This is a significant concern that must be addressed.

In addition, the Chinese have an interest in moving the financial capital of the world away from New York City.

Should the CIA support the perpetration of some type of terrorist event in the city, to be blamed on illegal immigration, together with the liberal politicians who will be governing in the future -- the Chinese could capitalize on financial disruption to effectively establish the yuan as the world's reserve currency.

This is China's goal, and China is supported in its current plans by other foreign adversaries of the United States, Russia foremost among them.

8.  So this is an extremely serious matter.

Answer:  It is, and we need to ensure that the CIA and its affiliates are not helping the enemies of our national security interests and those opposed to human sovereignty over the long term.

Significant territorial and geopolitical losses are involved in these plans, and, for the sake of our national sovereignty and the security interests of our allies, they must be halted.

9.  You have mentioned previously that there is a significant push at this time for "one world government" due to the global environmental crisis together with individuals who wish to exert totalitarian control over human society in the future.

Answer: That's correct.

10.  And you have stated your support for the United States to retain its territorial sovereignty in the hope that human sovereignty over the long term can also be rescued.

Answer:  I have, yes.  The sovereignty of the United States and the future sovereignty of humanity are inextricably linked.  If we don't have one, we will not have the other.,

And, clearly, as part of the this, the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court need immediate disclosure regarding certain programs implemented by the FBI and CIA.

11.  You have also pointed out that the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court need full disclosure regarding underground and in-mountain military facilities that our own military has constructed over time.

Answer:  The U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court need full information pertaining to all facilities constructed by the U.S. military and its contractors not currently in use by our own military personnel, and not intended for use by our own military personnel.  That is correct.

12.  Is there still time for a meaningful difference to be made?

Answer:  Of course, many factors must be understood in balancing the whole.  We all want to preserve the planet's environment.  But a future reliance on totalitarian governance by our foreign adversaries will not allow for the preservation of the global climate, nor for the sustenance of human sovereignty over the long term.

The United States needs to assume the global leadership role regarding these concerns.

We don't want to sell ourselves short at this juncture, because the costs in terms of the Earth's future and human freedoms are too overwhelming.

13.  What leverage do we have?

Answer:  We have the truth, which is not being spoken in China or Russia at all.

And the American people, in comprehending the truth, will elect to defend the territorial integrity of our nation, just as they will choose to defend the Constitutional principles on which our nation was founded.

Our people are capable of adapting to new circumstances quickly.  But we do need to provide them with their sovereignty when we ask for their support.

14.  So the Pandora Program?  The Particle Program?  Other programs that gratuitously violate the sovereignty of the individual, separate and apart from mission and objectives of the FBI and other agencies?

Answer:  These must be withdrawn, and as soon as possible.  The American people will rise to meet astonishing challenges, in my opinion.  But they need to be asked to do so with respect, with honor and with integrity.

15.  What are the risks if we fail to do so?

Answer:  The people cannot defend themselves against sovereignty assaults about which they are utterly uninformed.

The risks are the diminishment of human capacities in perpetuity.

The very real threat is, as Shoshana Zuboff referenced in her book, Surveillance Capitalism, a coup from above.

16.  What can alter the course we're currently on?

Answer:  As I said, the truth can alter the path.

We're all writing our own legacies at this juncture, and by that I mean that history will judge us by our courage and integrity in this moment.  No one should count on being able to conceal his or her conduct from the evaluations of history.

The truth is an astonishingly insistent and resilient force for good, even the difficult truth.

So, all of us who still possess the freedom to do so need to muster the courage to illuminate it.

17.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Dystopian History: Lying as an Institutional Culture Within the FBI

 1.  How did the FBI's system of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting get started?  What is the history of this astonishing undermining of the foundation the United States?

Answer:  J. Edgar Hoover was a big proponent of altering witness statements in-house under the auspices of Counterintelligence.  So, this was part of the training of FBI recruits for the fifty years of his tenure, and, unfortunately, it has expanded considerably since then.

Hoover was engaged in false reporting against John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr., whom he wrongfully accused of perpetrating violence behind closed doors.  

And he was engaged in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against certain members of Congress as a means of consolidating his power over time.

2.  What was the FBI's role in the assassination of JFK?

Answer:  Together with Allen Dulles at the CIA, the FBI's role was quite substantive.

There have been enough death-bed confessions now to illuminate exactly who was involved and through which agency they were hired.  

But the public is not going to see the most important FBI files on this subject released, despite the fact that President Trump has stated his support for that disclosure.

3.  Ever?  The American public will never have access to those files?

Answer:  The files implicate both the FBI and the CIA, and they contain knowingly false reporting that JFK was passing state secrets to his paramours.  So, no, we are not going to see that information released.

4.  But to what extent are the FBI and its affiliate agencies now coercing our elected leaders through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting about them and about their family members?

Answer:  This is currently happening at a level of 100%.  This is not to say that all votes on Capitol Hill are coerced, but it is rather to assert that the FBI is making the attempt to control the political process across the board, within both political parties, and with every election, every vote, and every law.

5.  What is the future of the sovereignty of the United States under these conditions?

Answer:  There are grievous concerns.  The assault by the FBI and its affiliates on the sovereignty of the United States is extensive, broad-based, predatory and relentless.  Every American has a dossier of false reporting about him or her, including many minor children.  And all of this information, most of it AI-generated at this point, is being aggregated for future use in the data centers that are currently being constructed all over the nation, and, indeed, the world.

(Corrupt San Mateo County Sheriff's Deputy Rick Chaput spent quite a while explaining to me that his children are not allowed to have any social media accounts, and his family photos are posted nowhere online, because they could be misused for the false reporting he himself was perpetrating against me.)

6.  So, everyone is really a "target of interest" for the FBI and its affiliates?

Answer:  That's right.  Everyone.  The FBI wants to exercise complete control over the social, financial, physical and political lives of everyone.  And the agency sees false reporting as necessary for the maintenance of that control.

7.  Why is this information now being aggregated within the data centers currently being constructed with the partnership of private companies like Apple and Google?

Answer:  Because AI-generated film, photos and audio is data rich, which is to say, it takes up a great deal of computing space.  Until now, the FBI has been reliant on private institutions to temporarily store the false dossiers of innocent Americans.  But the agency wants a more permanent storage solution which is met by the cloud computing manifested by the data centers.

8.  Is there any intention to sunset these programs?  To retire the false dossiers?  To dismantle the data centers?

Answer:  None whatsoever.  These are viewed by the FBI as the permanent architecture of totalitarianism with the FBI and its affiliate agencies at the top of the societal structure.

So, unless we state our objection at this moment in time, this will represent our future.

And it is unequivocally dystopian.

9.  What are the greatest risks?

Answer:  The greatest risks are already being realized, and they consist of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and its affiliates being brought by corrupt law enforcement agencies before judges who approve of physical harm toward innocent defendants as a direct result of those lies.

10.  This is a result of conceal judicial processes that took hold following 9/11?

Answer:  Exactly so.  The FBI simply needs to accuse an innocent person of "terrorism" or "espionage" at some point through AI-generated messaging, and the agency can easily have the individual sentenced to death through a concealed judicial proceeding as a result.

11.  The accused person will never have an idea of those proceedings?

Answer:  Not a whisper.  

12.  But they can be killed for crimes of which they have no knowledge?

Answer:  Exactly so.

13.  What is your view of this conduct?

Answer:  The FBI has a difficult set of mission and objectives.  But the agency does not need knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting to assist in their manifestation.  Behind closed doors and in the open, the agency should not be purveying lies about the American public in the name of so-called "national security."

That type of dishonorable conduct will serve to destroy the security of our nation, not preserve it.

14.  What do you say to Txx Lxxxx' and Bxxxxxx Pxxx's assertions that "sovereignty is over"?

Answer:  Good people will always yearn to be free.  And these men cannot kill that desire.  They cannot kill that dream.  They cannot kill the soul of our nation, as much as they might desire to do so.

15.  What would you say to Txx Lxxxx, knowing that he is still lying about you in judicial proceedings to which you yourself have no access in the hope of gaining a court order authorizing your murder?

Answer:  Don't forget that he's hoping to profiteer from that process to very substantive degree.  This is a story of murder for profit for these men, and that's what the public cannot forget.

I would say to him that he needs to explain himself to me in an open courtroom, where the public can have access to his lies alongside my own access, alongside my beloved family members' access, alongside my cherished friends' access.

16.  Is Txx Lxxxx accountable to you as an American citizen, as a parent, as a wife, as a highly honorable person who continues to advocate for the sovereignty of our nation and the human rights of our citizens and others in the long term?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  He certainly is.  But I think it is also important to understand that the whole of the FBI is accountable to the American people for its lies about them, for its gratuitous trafficking of their children, for its treasonous undermining of the sovereignty of our nation in its entirety.  The whole agency is wrong for the harm it is causing, separate and apart from mission and objectives.  And the architecture which has systematized this gratuitous institutional harm must be undone.  Publicly or privately, these steps must be taken if any meaningful sovereignty of our country, and indeed of humankind, is to endure.

17.  You have spoken about the Pandora and Particle programs as appalling FBI assaults on fundamental human sovereignty.  Are there other programs that are perhaps too sensitive to describe publicly, about which the Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress in its entirety should have unfettered access?

Answer:  The Prometheus Program and the Ark Program.

18.  Is there anything at all that you can disclose about these programs?

Answer:  Not much, no.  I can say that the American public should not be subjected to unconsented experimentation as a general principle.  And I would hope this is a commitment that we can all proclaim in good faith.

19.  What kind of outreach do you need at the current time regarding your loved ones' safety, your own personal safety, and the progress of your case?

Answer:  Immediate and honorable.

20.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

The Particle Program

 1.  What is the CIA's "Particle Program," about which the FBI is fully informed?

Answer:  Particle refers to the nanotechnology program which involves mind-mapping and neural stimulation on the cellular level within the cortical space with the express intention of perpetrating sovereignty violations of targeted individuals.

2.  How do nanoparticles become introduced into the human body in the first place?

Answer:  Through touch.  So, hand creams, moisturizers, shampoos, sun screen, makeup, clothing, bedsheets, furniture, car upholstery -- all of these represent easy routes for the deployment of nanotechnology.

3.  If nanoparticles enter the skin through any of these routes, is the process noticeable for the victim?  Is there a break in the skin?

Answer:  There is no break in the skin whatsoever.  No visible wound or entry point.  The victim might notice a slight tingling sensation on the skin at the entry locus, but there is no redness or irritation to be noticed.  So, this is an invisible deployment with very scant means of detection.

4.  You mentioned "mind-mapping" as a significant part of Particle.  What is "mind-mapping" exactly?

Answer:  Some people may be familiar with the fact that the state of California recently added "neural data" to its list of "sensitive information" that can be collected about any given individual.  This is not science fiction, so we truly need to attend to what is going on here.  Companies which are listed as "contractors" by the CIA and FBI collect "neural data" through nanotechnology deployments, after which this information is transferred to the three-letter agencies for active use.

The "mind-mapping" conducted by agency contractors involves patterning which areas of the brain are activated when certain thoughts or activities are manifesting.

So, for example, if I have a positive thought about my best friend, the areas of my brain that are activated when I think about that particular friend, and also the areas of my brain that are activated when I am thinking lovingly about my friend, are documented and recorded.

That's "mind-mapping."

When I think about my best friend, my mind illuminates with a unique pattern.  

With nanotechnology, the FBI and its affiliate agencies, are actively learning, without my consent, what that pattern is.

5.  Why is the FBI interested in this type of invasion of privacy?

Answer:  Because nanotechnology can not only document mind-mapping patterns on the part of the individual, but it can later activate specific patterns at the directive of the FBI or its affiliates.

The particles representing a nanotechnology deployment can stimulate the same areas of the brain in the same pattern that "lights up" when I think about my best friend.

They can also stimulate certain areas of the brain when I am making an important decision, for example, because the FBI will have been paying close attention to the way my brain works when I say "yes" to something, as opposed to the way it works when I say "no" to something.

6.  So, the Particle Program can overtake the sovereignty of the individual?

Answer:  It's critical for us to understand that this is its intent.  If we're aware of Particle deployments, we can appropriately combat them, however.  And this is what is necessary if American citizens, and, by extension, the United States as a whole, is to maintain its sovereignty over any meaningful period of time.

The sovereignty of the individual and the sovereignty of the nation are inextricably linked.  If we lose one, we also lose the other.

So the question of individual sovereignty is critically bound to our hope to defend our national security interests over the long term.

7.  We recently heard Senator Mark Kelly and other Democrats urging the United States armed forces to refuse orders that are unlawful.  What does that urgent warning mean in the context of sovereignty violations like the Pandora and Particle programs?

Answer:  Senator Mark Kelly is an astronaut and maintains close ties to the DoD.  What we are hearing is concern from our military leadership with regard to some of the directives that may be currently reaching the chain of command.  In other words, our military leadership would like for there to be a failsafe mechanism in place, so that military personnel, on receiving an order that clearly contradicts the long term security interests of the United States, could object.

8.  Can you give us an example?

Answer:  Of course.  Yes.  Let's say that military personnel or military contractors were directed to deploy a radiological weapon in San Francisco, for example.  Such an act would clearly violate the Constitution, the territorial integrity of the United States and the long term security interests of our nation.  

Under those circumstances, the military leadership would like the rank and file to have the freedom, in exercising their own independent sovereignty, to say no in such a way that the matter could be formally evaluated by a judicial process, which would almost certainly disallow the deployment.

9.  Is the Particle Program an impediment to the type of failsafe you are referencing, in which the individual musters the self-determination to object to a direct order, knowing that he or she would be violating critical aspects of Constitutional mandates if he or she carried out the order?

Answer:  Every sovereignty violation endangers this failsafe, yes.  Pandora, Particle, and others.  If the individual making the decision about whether to object to a wrongful command has suffered extensive sovereignty violations, he or she simply will no longer have the independence of mind to appropriately evaluate the dilemma.

That's why it is critical that programs such as Pandora and Particle be withdrawn as soon as possible.

10.  If someone has suffered from nanotechnology deployments, and it seems as though many of us may have done so without our knowledge or consent, what can they do to combat the effects?

Answer:  Taking the supplement EDTA, along with higher dose Vitamin C, appears to chelate nanotechnology particles.  So, this approach is key.

In addition, magnet therapy will disrupt the organization of nanoparticles in the brain and elsewhere, causing a delay in the intended stimulation of regions of the brain involved in higher order thinking, critical decision-making among them.

So, these approaches should be utilized by key decision-makers within our government and our military, both.

11.  Should the OIG Hotline be requesting all information regarding Particle from the FBI, so that this program can be evaluated by the Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress as a whole?

Answer:  That's an emphatic yes.  The Supreme Court and the U.S. Congress need to intervene here to ensure that our individual sovereignty is protected as a foundational right, one that the FBI and its affiliates cannot violate, invade, or overthrow.

12.  How urgent is this necessity?

Answer:  Highly urgent.  The U.S. military leadership may not approve of the some of the directives that are scheduled to enter the chain of command through the influence of Russia and others.  They want the rank and file to serve as a safeguard to the nation, and that means we all need to be on high alert with regard to our potential contribution to the ongoing sovereignty of our nation.

13. Can the individuality that Americans have always prized as part of our national ethos effectively rescue the sovereignty of our nation as a whole?

Answer:  We need to be repeating the message to Americans to strive to think for themselves, and we need to give them the tools to do so.  But, in answer to your question, yes, our independence can serve as a profoundly resilient bulwark against attacks on our country's sovereignty.

14.  But aren't military personnel trained to follow orders without question?  Isn't this drilled into them from Basic Training onward?

Answer:  Our country now needs more, and that's why our leaders are asking for more.  It would help military personnel to be provided with hypothetical scenarios in allowing them to practice the circumstances in which objections to direct orders could be raised.

15.  Haven't your sons received direct orders to lie about their childhoods in order to wrongfully justify harm against your husband and yourself?

Answer:  This is what the FBI has repeatedly alleged, yes.

16.  Do direct orders to lie about one's own parents for the sake of first-degree murder and profiteering constitute wrongful directives?

Answer:  Of course.

17.  Yet, your sons have experienced profound sovereignty violations, haven't they?

Answer:  Yes, they have.

18.  Can they object to those wrongful directives at this time?

Answer:  The FBI seems to be preventing me from speaking to them directly, so I suspect that, with encouragement from me, they might still be able to object.

Without loving communication from me, they are isolated and imperiled, and their ability to resist such directives is profoundly diminished.

19.  To be clear, have your sons and MX all suffered Particle deployments?

Answer:  They have suffered Particle deployments, Pandora deployments, and more.  Yes.

20.  Will you please keep in close communication with us with regard to your wellbeing and that of your family under these astonishing circumstances, both for your loved ones and for our nation?

Answer:  Yes, I will, and thank you for your concern for us.

Lane MacWilliams

Pandora

 Pandora is the name of the CIA program about which the OIG Hotline should request all information possessed by the FBI, in order to provide full documentation to the U.S. Supreme Court and all members of the United States Congress.

This program represents the source of the most serious sovereignty violations being perpetrated against United States citizens currently, and its far-reaching harms are being felt among all U.S. allies.

The scope of the harm to be perpetrated against U.S. citizens through the Pandora program is disproportionate to the harm to other nations, however.  And this imbalance is due to decision-making by Russia as our foreign adversary.

Within a comparatively short period of time, under circumstances in which Pandora has been deployed, affected individuals lose all capability of sovereign decision-making.  This is not solely due to the brain-damaging sequelae of Pandora deployment, but is also due to certain external controls of which it is critical that the OIG Hotline, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the United States Congress now be fully informed.

The Pandora program has been part of the CIA since its founding, and its deployments were utilized in a much broader context, not understood by the United States, during World War II.

Problems with disproportionate deployment of Pandora within the United States at this time pertain to a clear and present risk of the loss of the territorial integrity of the United States as a whole.  The threat of land invasion by our foreign adversaries is greatly heightened by current Pandora deployments, a vulnerability to which the United States military leadership takes serious objection while the CIA pleads relative neutrality.

At risk is not only the sovereignty of the United States, but along with it, the sovereignty of mankind for the foreseeable future.

The subject of defense against Pandora deployment on the part of the public is receiving no media focus whatsoever, given that there remains a threat of Russian nuclear aggression if Pandora is effectively countered.

The task is to make the point that other deployments related to gxxxxxx exxxxxxxxxx and pxxxxx hxxxxx render Pandora deployments utterly unnecessary, and to combine this argument with pragmatic disclosures to the public which advice that certain steps be taken in the interests of individual health.

Those steps include the following:

1.  the role of music in the normalization of human cognitive patterns following Pandora deployment

2.  the role of vibration plates in optimizing neural function within the human brain following Pandora deployment

3.  the role of electrical stimulation devices in the normalization of human cognition following Pandora deployment

4.  the role of heat therapy through sauna exposure in the optimization of cognitive health following Pandora deployment

5.  the role of magnet therapy exposure in the optimization of cognitive health following Pandora deployment

6.  the role of nutritional adjuncts in the preservation of cortical matter under adverse conditions, including Pandora deployment

Specific guidelines should be provided to the American public, and others, as determined appropriate by the U.S. military leadership in defense of the nation's preservation of fundamental sovereignty and security.

To be clear, Pandora deployments and fade deployments are one and the same, constituting assaults on the sovereignty of our nation, alongside the identity, personhood, and self-determination of the individual citizen.

In every respect, individual sovereignty and the national interest can be seen as synonymous.

The capability of the CIA to withdraw Pandora deployments on a broad scale is unknown.

American citizens must continue to think for themselves, to reason independently, to engage in moral decision-making that is based on the ethical compass and inner conscience developed by each individual over a lifetime of complex and deep development of compassion and principle, wisdom and discernment, courage and integrity, love of justice and temperance in its manifestation, and the deepest bonds that inform and enrich the human condition.

Only in this way can the worthiness, the benevolence, and the magnificent potential of the human endeavor be preserved.

Can we accept a rebalancing of human populations with the long term needs of the earth's environment, even as we insist that human sovereignty, together with that of the United States, be preserved as among our most sacred and inviolable gifts?

This is our most urgent mandate, and in its manifestation, we cannot fail.

Lane MacWilliams

Monopoly Reconceived

 1.  What are the greatest challenges you are currently facing?

Answer:  It seems that the FBI has been forced to remove my family's names from their Disposition Matrix list, but the CIA has not.  So the greatest challenge I am currently facing relates to the increasing presence of the CIA and CIA contractors in preying upon me, and preying upon my loved ones as well.

2.  What does that mean in terms of your daily experience?

Answer:  It means that the CIA is reported to have placed an explosive device in whatever car I drive, including my rental car.  And, associated with that, the agency threatens to detonate it while I am driving, as well as to cause a "gas explosion" in my hotel room, intended to be attributed to a faulty fireplace.

But it also means that people I encounter daily are paid to cause me gratuitous harm.  

A young woman named Finn at Bosley's Pet Store in Whistler was allegedly paid to injure my puppy Birdie yesterday, requiring an urgent trip to the Vet's office.

So, routine daily tasks can become exceptionally dangerous for me, and they have.

3.  The FBI has allegedly explained this heightened aggression by stating that the agency is "desperate."  What are your thoughts about this issue?

Answer:  I believe that Txx Lxxxx is desperate, certainly.  And I believe that those who are closely associated with him may be desperate, too.  But this is the reason that a high-level intermediary should be brought on immediately, someone with whom I can be communicating on an immediate basis in the restoration of my fundamental human rights, as well as the rights of my loved ones.

4.  Can this be accomplished?

Answer:  It really must be accomplished.

5.  Your prior hotel, Delta Whistler Village Suites, has not yet refunded a wrongful $47 Clearance Fee charge for a FedEx package that never arrived.  Why is this?

Answer:  The manager's handler is not allowing the refund to take place, apparently.  And the reason for this is that the contents of the alleged package, which are unknown to my husband and unknown to me, must be terribly implicating.

6.  Does this FBI know what the contents of the package are?

Answer:  The FBI or its affiliate agencies impersonated my husband to send it, so, yes, the FBI knows what the contents are.

7.  There has been an allegation that the FBI and its affiliate agencies plan to stage a "terrorist attack" at Delta Whistler Village Suites or a local hotel, with a plan to blame you for the damage.  Somehow, the FBI's mysteriously missing FedEx package is supposed to be part of this scheme.  What are your thoughts about this?

Answer:  Well, don't stop there.  

There is also an allegation that FBI and affiliated contractors have utilized military telemetry to mark fixed points in my hotel suite so that sniping from long distances can be perpetrated with astonishing precision.

Further, there is an allegation that the FBI and its affiliates have seeded cliffs above Hwy. 99 with explosives in order to time a fatal detonation of my car to be simultaneous with a staged "avalanche."

Beyond this, there are threats to rebuild a demolished hotel with funds awarded and misappropriated from my own case, in a remarkable "Monopoly" game that consists of criminal "detonations" by the FBI and its affiliates to be followed by new Hotel construction owned by President Trump.

8.  That's quite a strategy for owning the Boardwalk by the end of the game.

Answer:  Isn't it?  I have never heard of a more cynical or abusive ploy, yet the FBI appears to be asserting with confidence that this is one of the plans actively being advanced.

9.  You have made clear that you do not believe all aspects of your case should be made public.

Answer:  That's correct.

10.  But at the same time, you do not believe that the FBI's schemes of gratuitous harm and profiteering from predation against innocents should be allowed.

Answer:  I do not.  Whether this is manifesting through gratuitous human trafficking or real-life Monopoly games with the lives and private property of others, these needless predatory schemes should be decisively disallowed.

11.   Who needs to remove your family members' names and your own from the CIA's "Disposition Matrix," or whatever it is named within CIA auspices?

Answer:  The ODNI needs to do so, and, correspondingly, President Trump needs to do so.

12.  Will you please let us know how you and your loved ones are managing, including your beloved pets, under these extraordinary circumstances?

Answer:  Of course.  Yes.

13.  It seems that material progress is required on an immediate basis, and the presence of a high-level intermediary, as you have suggested, is well overdue.

Answer:  Quite so.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  I appreciate your concern for us, and you are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Cell Phone Use Again Appropriated Entirely By the FBI and Its Affiliates

  At this particular time, no assessments against my account should be allowed through allegations of wrongdoing on the part of one or more of my family members or on the part of myself, or on the basis of documentation from me allowing withdrawals, given that such documentation would represent forgeries.  Settlements should not be extended to my sons or MX in any manner that represents withdrawals from my account, nor should settlements be extended in any form to my sons without my express knowledge and consent, given capacity concerns.  At this time, I grant the OIG Hotline my permission to address misconduct by the FBI and its affiliates that may have occurred during an interim period when this was disallowed.  Resulting penalties against the FBI or its affiliates may be funded to my account, but assessments may not be withdrawn for any reason at this time.

Please be apprised that as of 12:02 PM today, November 16, 2025, my cell phone was disabled for my use.  My iPhone cannot now be turned off due to the FBI's Pegasus-style hack of my device.  Nor can "airplane mode" be turned on.  The screenshot function has been disabled, and my messages to my older son and husband, and theirs to me appear to be rapidly erased from my device.

In this state, my iPhone can suffer from "Wifi piggybacking," in which nearby hackers are enabled to send messages utilizing my IP address to impersonate me online.

This is to confirm that I remain honorable and lawful in every regard, demonstrating the highest character and integrity, as always.

Under these circumstances, the ability of the FBI and its affiliates to engage in egregiously falsified law enforcement reporting is exaggerated, affording me no ability to limit access of corrupt individuals to my device, even while I myself am completely unable to use my cell phone.

It must be noted that the borrowed laptops at the Whistler Public Library do not appear to possess a VPN, rendering them vulnerable to IP appropriation as well.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Lane MacWilliams

The Risks to Public Safety When the FBI Descends on a Small Resort Town in Canada

 OIG Hotline, please be apprised that, next door to my suite #3xx at the Westin this afternoon, a young child was screaming for a prolonged period of time.  This sounded like a toddler, and certainly, toddler tantrums are commonplace.  However, because of Txx Lxxxx' apparent desire to project his own crimes onto me as his innocent "target of interest," this type of event is dangerous for the child and for me as well.

Further, this afternoon, on entering Whistler Public Library, a toddler appeared without any parent nearby.  I immediately reunited her with her mother, who appeared to be concealing herself around the building's corner in an apparently staged interaction with the child, though certainly not hide-and-seek.  Later, within the Library, the same toddler approached me with a big "hello!" while I was working on my computer.  Once again, I immediately reunited her with her mother.

Clearly, there appears to be a potential agenda here.

I do love children and I do support their safety at all times, and a two to three year old should never be wandering alone anywhere in public.  Period.

I gently chastised the mother in this instance, expressing that I was certainly glad the child was not be herself, as she appeared to be.

I raised my two sons with great love and attention to their safety.  Children need freedom, yes, but at two or three years of age, they need a loving parent or attentive caregiver close by.  And no child development expert will disagree with me.

The FBI appears to have advised me to keep a log of all of my time and activities in order to prevent any false allegations by Mr. Lxxxx and his corrupt law enforcement cohort.  In addition, I audio record all of my time.  However, I am concerned about these potentially staged situations, and particularly that at the Westin, given recent FBI references to Madeleine McCann, who apparently disappeared from a hotel room while traveling with her family.

Is Txx Lxxxx desperate enough to harm a child and blame the crime on someone else for the sake of defending his own reputation?

He is alleged to have already done so!

So, yes!  The man appears to be highly capable of harming the innocent and blaming those crimes on the innocent as well!

Suffice it to say that I do not want to be hearing about any children missing from any hotel at which I am staying, whether the Westin, Delta Whistler Village Suites, or otherwise.

Mr. Lxxxx needs to account to me for his crimes against my family members and myself, and whether he is granted judicial or executive permission to stand to account privately, through an attorney, or whether he must face accountability publicly, through broad public exposure, is now largely up to me.

The man's lack of remorse does not do him credit, I must say, nor does it credit the FBI as a whole.

Because of the seriousness of the sovereignty violations perpetrated against me last night, and due to the FBI's apparent allegations of aggression against me at my hotel tonight, November 15/16, 2025, I will be rendering this documentation public until and unless I have appropriate dialogue with a high-level attorney who can begin to resolve my concerns to date to my satisfaction.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this important documentation to your Office.

Most sincerely,  

Lane MacWilliams

A Request for Intervention Re: Our Shared and Sovereign Future

OIG Hotline, there is an allegation that an explosive device was placed within my second rental vehicle in two days, under the driver's seat, yesterday afternoon while I was shopping for sundries within Longs Drugs in Squamish, British Columbia.

When I returned to my vehicle, there was evidence that it had been entered during my fifteen minute absence, as four or five dashboard controls had been altered.

Additionally, there was a municipal project in Whistler on Highway 99 yesterday morning, which allegedly involved the placement of explosives within a rock face overlooking southbound traffic, high enough to place both sides of the highway at risk of falling boulders and debris in the event of "landslide."

Both explosions, timed concurrently, could lead to an event with a 100 percent chance of fatality for me.

So, I need a spotlight on this issue, unfortunately.

Most pressingly, I need President Trump, CIA Director Ratcliffe, and FBI Director Patel, together with the United States Congress, to insist on the withdrawal of any and all directives to cause me harm and/or to cause harm to my loved ones.

It is my honor, my integrity, and my personal gifts that have allowed me to endure for eight years in the role of advocate for the American people, and, indeed, for all who love freedom.

If the long term sovereignty of our nation can ultimately flourish, it will be because of those who have had the courage, as my family has, to stand for what is right, and benevolent, and virtuous, and honorable and worthy against seemingly impossible odds.

I need the consensus of all who love our nation to be able to survive this ordeal and begin to make the meaningful difference to the future that is clearly intended.

So I thank our government officials in advance for their intervention on my behalf and that of my loved ones.

It is an astonishing realization that the legacies that last are the ones we ourselves write, often out of the public view, when no one is watching, and our courage is a private and heartfelt matter, seemingly concealed from the assessment of others.

Later, we may be surprised by the power and insistence of those private decisions, by their importance to others, and by their transformative potential.

The truth has a will, certainly, and that will has a life that cannot be diminished by time or weather or forgetting.

We as human beings reaffirm our worthiness when we stand for our highest principles, our deepest bonds, our most profound encounters with our souls' mysterious territory.  Ultimately, our love for one another cannot be replaced, feigned, duplicated, mimicked, performed, defamed or criminalized through AI aggregation.

Our human dignity will not be undone, and nor will the lives that most brightly illuminate it, as long as we remember our commitments to one another as promises that cannot be broken.

In this spirit, I ask for your efforts on my behalf and that of my family, so that I, in turn, may support our shared and sovereign future.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams