Where Are the Documents?

 OIG Hotline, this is to confirm that I still have no FOIA materials, no investigative materials, no letter from your Office, and no follow up regarding my case whatsoever.

The FBI appears to report that it is "working on" unlawful redactions and omissions of these documents at this time.

Meanwhile, my entire family is being endangered at FBI direction.

Does anyone see a conflict of interest present in the current situation?

I traveled to Washington, D.C. to facilitate a courier's delivery of these documents into my hands.

So, I know something about the appreciable challenges present.

This is not a case in which material could be placed in the mail or even placed in the hands of a courier without extensive communication with me as the intended recipient, and thorough security precautions provided regarding means of delivery.

Outreach is required -- outreach constituting real two-way communication regarding the secure and successful delivery of complete documents into my possession.

Please contact me so that this can be effectively accomplished without further delay that endangers my family.

My older son is beginning two classes with labs at a local community college this week, and already, I am receiving threats of kidnapping, trafficking, and further violence toward him, comparable to previous threats I have received from the FBI.

So we need intervention on our behalf in the form of direct outreach, and we need it immediately, please.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

The FBI As America's Lethal Parasite

OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to allege that the agency conveyed a Smith and Wesson into the hands of my older son today at an unknown point.

If this allegation is true, the agency will now need to "investigate" its own crime in weapons dealing, and "consider immunity" for my son who is acting in all measures under threat of death at the directive of his handler.

This corrupted manipulation of my sons and MX will go on indefinitely until some ethical person calls a halt to it.

It seems that ethical person is me.

So, fine.

I hereby inform the FBI that if it persists in the predatory abuse of my children, it willingly waives all future rights to have its concerns heard by me in any context except a public one.

My direct message to the agency is a simple one:

FBI, stop perpetrating weapons crimes and creating false "terrorism investigations" and "espionage investigations" through my sons by threatening them with ongoing trafficking, torture, illness and death. Stop coercing false witness statements from them under extreme duress. And stop your falsified law enforcement reporting regarding my other family members, who deserve to pursue their well-earned careers and lives with freedom that makes no room for your corrupt initiatives, which are deceitful and unworthy at every turn.

FBI personnel, the true parasite America is battling is you yourselves, who seek to profit from the suffering of your betters, and thus assuage your unremitting and indelible guilt.

It's not that easy, people.

FBI personnel, you are responsible for your crimes against my family, just as you are responsible for your crimes against our nation as a whole.

If you think your conduct is forgivable, let's ask the American people what they have to say, shall we?

Knowing the full truth, they will abandon the FBI as a failed, immoral, and predatory agency that can no longer serve the nation in any capacity.

I am not afraid of the nation's close scrutiny, FBI.

Why are you?

Lane MacWilliams

Communications to the OIG Hotline, April 7, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails previously identified by me for your Office.

Please pay special attention to an email to your Office with the subject heading ATTN: OIG HOTLINE Re: GTM Texts, Confidential, sent at 5:18 AM today, April 7, 2025.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 5, 2025

OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails previously identified by me for your Office.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

President Trump, Call My Sons Back, Please

President Trump, if in fact my sons have been deployed to commit assassinations through the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program, as the FBI appears to indicate, I respectfully request that they be called home on an immediate basis.

Whether their respective agencies have disclosed to you that they have allegedly deployed my sons, in direct contravention of all ethical standards, remains unclear.

But I believe you disagree with the human trafficking and torture that have been inflicted on my sons and my youngest son's fiancee, in direct violation of their constitutional rights.

And I believe you now wish to stand before the American public, the Congress, the DOJ, and the Supreme Court in order to convey that human trafficking and torture, as perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates against honorable Americans, is profoundly and unequivocally wrong.

And I believe you now wish to convey that you respect and uphold the Supreme Court's ruling in my favor, indicating that FOIA reports and investigative reports should now be provided to me on an immediate basis, without redaction or omission.

And I believe you now wish to communicate that to turn the sons of a highly honorable whistleblower into murderers at the behest of a corrupt FBI, as President Biden directed during his presidency, represents an intolerable violation of the civil rights of the American public.

And I believe you value the future freedoms of Americans more highly than you do the plans of the FBI and its affiliates to profiteer from the profound and unforgivable harm of America's children, separate and apart from any mission or objectives ever extended to this federal agency or any other.

In recognition of your insistence on leading the United States with character and integrity, I appreciate your intervention to safeguard my family's wellbeing and my own on an immediate basis.

For your reference, Mr. President, this is my son Graham Tate MacWilliams:

And this is my son Duncan Sayer MacWilliams:

Thank you for prioritizing my family's wellbeing and my own by forbidding my sons' participation in any further harms, just as you forbid any further harms from being perpetrated against them by the FBI and its affiliates.

I also extend my gratitude to the U.S. Congress, the DOJ, and the Supreme Court for extending their united support for the full recovery of my sons and my youngest son's fiancee, along with my husband and myself, and including our pets, who have also suffered recent harm at FBI directive.

I look forward to addressing all areas of concern with regard to my case so that my family can be reunited and restored in every capacity, and so that the long term freedoms of Americans can be safeguarded in a manner that will prove us worthy of the public trust.

Thank you for your ethical engagement with this matter, Mr. President.

Sincerely yours,

Lane MacWilliams

On What Can We All Agree?

• A Bitcoin account, in any total imaginable, is not as important as the freedom of mankind.

• Uncut diamonds, in any amount collectible, will never be equal to the wellbeing of our children.

• 8.5 trillion dollars, awarded in my name under the auspices of the OIG Hotline and ODNI, should not be misappropriated by those who would trade our future for those funds.

• Our concern for one another transcends material wealth.

• Our deep sense of community is a fundamental part of what renders human society worthy.

• Our obligations to one another consist of a commitment to care about the wellbeing and the future of others.

• The FBI and its affiliates have engaged in the trafficking of America's children separate and apart from any mission or objectives with which the agency has ever been tasked.

• If that institutional crime is not now halted, our future freedoms will be rendered forfeit.

• There can be no "profit" from the enslavement of our children that is worth the loss to human civilization.

• None of our children should be forced to harm themselves or others through coercion by the FBI and its affiliate agencies.

• None of our children should be rendered ill or dying by the FBI if they refuse.

• None of our children should be killed by the FBI if they refuse.

• Separate and apart from politics, no human being will benefit from the loss of the sovereignty of the human race.

• The left and the right are called to stand in defense of America's children, as I stand in defense of them.

• In the final analysis of our contributions, nothing will matter more.

• The Supreme Court's ruling that outreach should now be extended to me, disclosing FOIA and investigative reports in full, should be honored and upheld.

• The courage and fortitude of those who stand in defense of our freedoms is seen and known, and their request for unity in this task must be answered by our full voices.

• On these truths, all of us can agree, and so I ask for our leaders' overwhelming and unequivocal support at this time.

Lane MacWilliams

Update Re: Health, Communication, and Safety

 1.  Did you receive any communication from the FBI yesterday expressing any possible confidentiality requests on the part of the agency?

Answer:  No, I did not.

2.  Have you been asked to sign any confidentiality agreements regarding the agency's unjustified harms against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  No, I have not.

3.  Have you received any outreach from the DOJ or anyone else pertaining to your case?

Answer:  No, I have not.

4.  Has your family members' health been restored, as far as you know?

Answer:  No, it has not.

5.  Has the health of your pets been restored as of this documentation?

Answer:  No, it has not.

6.  Has your own health been restored at this time?

Answer:  No, it has not.

7.  Hasn't the Supreme Court required that honorable and lawful outreach to you now occur?

Answer:  I believe it has, yes.

8.  Are you insisting that the Supreme Court's ruling in your favor now be upheld?

Answer:  Yes, I am.

9.  Are there those within the government who uphold your position?

Answer:  I know there are.

10.  Do your family members' lives, your own life, and the lives of your pets continue to be under active threat from the FBI?

Answer:  They do.

11.  Is there anything more you would like to state at this time?

Answer:  I will be making a statement separately.

12.  Thank you for the update.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 4, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com,.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 3, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com,.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF LACK OF ALL CONFIDENTIALITY REQUESTS FROM THE FBI

Federal Bureau of Investigation:

You and your affiliates have engaged in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against my family and myself in a case which you decisively lost before the Supreme Court.

FOIA reports and investigative reports are now due to me on an immediate basis.

Your ongoing efforts, through the effects of torture and individual sovereignty violations, to task my two sons with human trafficking assignments, assassinations, animal cruelty, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, terrorism-affiliated crimes, and espionage-related crimes condemn every aspect of your failed agency's corruption and predation.

Your ongoing attempts to impugn the high character of my husband and myself are equally reprehensible.

I requested outreach regarding my case by today, April 2, 2025, explaining that in the absence of any communication from the FBI or its representative by this date, the agency would be communicating to me that it possessed no confidentiality concerns whatsoever regarding my case.

The OIG Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice and the ODNI are said to have awarded more than 8 trillion dollars in my name regarding the FBI's crimes, yet I have not been formally notified of any of those awards.

Instead, the FBI has continued to attempt to take my life and those of my family members through plans of first-degree murder against its betters.

To ensure that the FBI and its affiliates are fully apprised of my understandable assumption, given its unexplained silence in the face of my repeated requests for communication, that the agency has no confidentiality needs regarding this matter, I am publishing this letter publicly, as well as sending a copy to the FBI's FOIA Office, with a copy to the OIG Hotline.

I will grant the FBI until 5:00 PM East Coast time on April 3, 2025 to engage in outreach if the agency possesses any requests for confidentiality regarding my case which it would like to communicate.

My email and phone number are known by the OIG Hotline, which has been investigating this matter on an ongoing basis.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 2, 2025

OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com,.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Outreach

1. You do not recommend that PG&E cut your power tomorrow.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct.  Such an action would be highly inadvisable.

2.  May I ask why?

Answer:  I have sufficient information about PG&E's predations toward my family and my properties specifically that any further aggression whatsoever will be taken as overt, unjustifiable hostility that will require a response involving public exposure of this agency's crimes and many other details of the FBI's criminal predation toward my family.

3.  Would an exception be presented by outreach to you by tomorrow, which you have requested?

Answer:  Outreach will not occur tomorrow if the power is cut.  So, for there to be a power outage on the day of a deadline for outreach -- this would represent an unfortunate signal toward escalation of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and attendant harms.

And that is simply unacceptable to me.

4.  What do you mean by unacceptable?

Answer:  If I do not receive outreach by tomorrow, I will be formally expressing to the FBI that the agency has, in failing to engage in honorable outreach, communicated that it has no confidentiality concerns regarding any aspect of my case whatsoever.

5.  So, if you do not receive honorable outreach by tomorrow, the FBI will be giving you permission to discuss all of its crimes against you publicly.  

Answer:  It most certainly will.

6.  Do you believe that any aspect of your case may be considered confidential by the FBI or any of its affiliates?

Answer:  I don't have any idea.  I'm a civilian.  That's why I have repeatedly asked for honorable outreach concerning this matter -- so that appropriate, peaceable communication can take place that includes any and all expression of confidentiality concerns that could possibly exist.  

Any viable federal law enforcement agency would respond to such a request with professional and peaceable outreach.  In that absence of that, it is reasonable to assume that there are no confidentiality concerns on the part of the FBI or any of its affiliates pertaining to this case.

7.  Will you please let us know if you experience a power outage tomorrow?  

Answer:  I may not be able to do so in real time due to the impediments to communication, but yes, I will post on my blog as soon as I am able to do so.

8.  The FBI appears to be suggesting that it has coerced one or both of your sons into providing knowingly false witness statements intended to wrongfully justify a raid on your household tomorrow, during a power outage inappropriately facilitated by PG&E.  Is that your understanding?

Answer:  The FBI appears to be making this suggestion, yes.

9.  What is your perspective regarding this threat?

Answer:  The FBI needs to find another line of work.  This cycle of torture, coerced false witness statements, and threatened law enforcement raids is a dystopian system that needs to be retired completely.

10.  What do you think about the FBI's renewed threats of conveying tuberculosis, HIV, and many other acute illnesses to your family members or to you yourself, in addition to the threats of cancer, car accident, arson, wildfire, staged plane accident, intentional brain damage, kidnapping, arrest, predation toward your pets, and countless other harms?

Answer:  Again, these standard operating procedures on the part of the FBI simply need to be shelved.  They're deeply wrong from an ethical perspective.  No worthy court of law is going to uphold such harms, knowing that they are based on false witness statements extracted under torture.

11.  Does President Trump hold the power to pull the FBI into line?

Answer:  This has been the hope.

12.  Has that hope materialized?

Answer:  I do not yet have outreach, but I hope it will be soon forthcoming.

13.  Outreach would tell you what?

Answer:  That President Trump is running the country as an effective and conscientious chief executive who is not going to tolerate an FBI that trafficks, tortures and preys upon our youth and others in a manner that stands completely separate and apart from mission and objectives.

14.  And the lack of outreach would tell you what?

Answer:  That organized crime has taken over, with the FBI and the CIA as its chief representatives, often advancing the interests of the foreign adversaries of the United States.

15.  Will you be writing more about this if there is no honorable outreach extended to you by the end of the business day tomorrow?

Answer:  Much more.

16.  Specifically because the FBI will be communicating that it has no confidentiality concerns regarding your case whatsoever?

Answer:  Exactly so.

17.  You are not willing to suffer additional health harms to your family members, your pets or you yourself perpetrated by a wayward FBI or by anyone.  

Answer:  No, I am not.

18.  And you are no longer willing to wear a gas mask in your own home, check for radon gas constantly, measure ionizing radiation "hotspots," be constantly on guard for infectious disease caused by both environmental and non-conventional vectors.

Answer:  No, I am not.

19.  You traveled to Washington, D.C. in order to make yourself available to the DOJ and to facilitate the conveyance of FOIA and investigative reports due to you, in addition to traveling to Cape Cod and then back home, communicating honorably to District Attorneys, police departments and sheriff's offices all the while.  So, you now feel done with law enforcement corruption.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  When law enforcement does not accept your open invitation to an honorable conversation, there is no truthful law enforcement reporting going on.  It's all a sham, and those perpetrating it know perfectly well it's a sham.  By offering to assist them in their work by speaking to them directly, I simply called their bluff.  These people had nothing to say.  Zero.  And that says it all.

20.  They're lying.

Answer:  They're lying, and they've been lying the whole time.  And those lies are being utilized to hurt the best Americans we have.  

So, once again, we're facing a problem with law enforcement corruption in which law enforcement personnel are doing the bidding of our foreign adversaries who want to see us weak, disorganized, confused, sick, dying, impoverished and undone as a nation.

21.  You want more for us.

Answer:  Yes, I do.  I expect more for the United States and that means that outreach needs to occur regarding this matter, and it needs to occur right away.

22.  Please keep us updated with regard to the simple question of whether PG&E cuts your power tomorrow.

Answer:  I will do my best.

23.  If an attorney contacts you, will you be updating us?

Answer:  An attorney may request confidentiality during discussion, and I would be inclined to honor that request.

24.  For what reason?

Answer:  If someone is engaging in outreach in good faith, it's appropriate to converse with them with an understanding of their concerns.

25.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 1, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including, but not limited to, those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Crimes Against Human Sovereignty By the FBI

1.  What is it like to have your older son unlawfully tasked with "cleaning" assignments or worse by his corrupt handler within the CIA?

Answer:  To be clear, the CIA is acting as an FBI contractor in this case, because the CIA only forcibly recruited my older son at FBI initiative.

But in answer to your question, the experience is horrific and stands in direct repudiation of all human decency and societal virtue.

2.  Your son has a disability which, through your Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney, has invalidated his prior agreements with the CIA.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

3.  Even so, his handler continues to unlawfully task him by threatening his life.  Isn't that so?

Answer:  Yes.

4.  And the threats to his life are not empty.  Rather they have involved the CIA's communication to your son of deadly disease, which his handler refused to treat unless your son follows his handler's directives.  Isn't that accurate?

Answer:  It is accurate.

5.  What wrongful acts did your son's handler direct him to perpetrate last night?

Answer:  I honestly don't know.  This could have constituted a "cleaning" assignment, though the FBI alleges that he was forced to perpetrate harm of some kind.

6.  What is a "cleaning assignment"?

Answer:  It is the forced desecration of a human corpse through dismemberment following a first-degree murder committed by the FBI or its affiliates.  And I'm sure it involves an attempt to erase evidence that a violent crime has been committed.

7.  When your son's handler has forced him to perpetrate harm in the past, what has that harm consisted of?  Torture?  Rape?  Murder?

Answer:  I don't know.  What I can say is that my son has lost his sovereignty as a direct result of the FBI's crimes against him and against our family. So his handler could direct him to do anything and he would be unable to refuse.

8.  What methods are utilized in stealing the sovereignty of an American citizen?

Answer:  In my older son's case, torture, rape, trafficking, and the conveyance of deadly disease have all been utilized, in addition to numerous other "methods" routinely used by the FBI as mechanisms of control over targeted members of the American public.

9.  You have recently disclosed that the FBI is heavily involved in the trafficking of American citizens.  Is the agency attempting to discredit your family as a result?  Is this why your son was given a wrongful directive by his handler last night?

Answer:  Honestly, it seems to be about discrediting my family, yes.  But I think the larger objective is to attempt to extract false witness statements from my older son that would allow a wrongful law enforcement raid on our home.

10.  With a violent intent?

Answer:  Yes, with a violent intent.

11.  And is the plan oriented toward the misappropriation of funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI?

Answer:  It appears to be, yes.

12.  So, really, this is about greed.  Avarice.

Answer:  I believe that greed is the driving force behind these crimes against my family -- this insatiable hunger for money.

13.  Who is participating in these crimes against your family as perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates at this time?

Answer:  This is an important question, certainly.  Who knows about them?  Who is authorizing them?  Who is seeking to profit from them?

14.  The FBI has routinely threatened, having stolen your son's sovereignty, to direct him to commit public harm toward innocents, has it not?

Answer:  Yes, it has.

15.  Do you think the FBI, through its experiments with sovereignty violations, is responsible for a certain percentage of mass shootings in the public sphere?

Answer:  This is occurring, without doubt.  The question is to what degree.  Is the FBI responsible for fifty percent of mass shootings in the United States?  Eighty percent?  Ninety?  There is direct culpability for the agency in a majority of these crimes.

Again, I am not disclosing here the full range of methods the FBI is utilizing in sovereignty violations.  But the tools are extensive, and when I say sovereignty violations, I am really talking about a total usurpation of independent human will.

16.  A total overthrow of the individual's ability to make his or her own decisions?

Answer:  Complete.  Yes.  There are no vestiges left of the individual's capacity to reject wrongful directives from his handler.  

17.  What is it like to witness these violations perpetrated by the FBI against your own children?

Answer:  What is the scariest horror film you have ever seen?  Multiply it by one thousand.

18.  You have said that all of your efforts to invest your sons with an unshakeable ethical framework, guiding principles, and a moral reference frame to aid them in decision-making throughout life have been effectively erased by a predatory FBI in an astonishingly short period of time.

Answer:  The loss of sovereignty makes no exceptions for the children of those of us who were excellent, attentive and loving parents.  All of that human investment in raising wonderful young men and women is simply wiped out by these predatory and inhuman stratagems of sovereignty violation being deployed by the FBI.

19.  If this matter is not illuminated further, how do you evaluate the future freedoms of Americans as a whole?

Answer:  They are utterly forfeit.

If this nation cannot muster the will to care about my children, it will care about no one's children.

The FBI's sovereignty violations make a mockery of the Constitution, and the agency knows it well.

So without proper accountability in this case, there can be no future freedoms, and we cannot expect we will have another chance to rescue them.

20.  Why not?

Answer:  There's already a tremendous knowledge gap between the public's awareness of tools being wielded by the FBI and the FBI's active deployment of those modalities, and this chasm is rapidly expanding.  There will not come a future time in which we can pause to consider the effects of the FBI's virtual enslavement and exploitation of the public through the co-opting of the human will.  That moment is now, not later.

21.  Should the communications devices of the FBI and its affiliates have been removed from your sons and MX the moment it was determined that sovereignty violations were occurring?

Answer:  That very instant, yes.

22.  And did you request this?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  I requested it endlessly.

23.  Yet those communications devices are still in place?

Answer:  Yes, they are.

24.  Is this a failure of the DOJ?  Is this a failure of a judicial process?  Why were those communications devices not removed?

Answer:  These are important questions, and their answers deserve our full attention as a nation.

25.  Can't your sons' handlers be stopped?  Can't the White House forcefully direct them to stop?

Answer:  Again, these are critical questions, and I'm glad you're giving voice to them.

26.  The FBI has also recently conveyed serious illness to you and to your pets.  It's not only your sons who are experiencing the terrible harms the agency is now wielding against you.

Answer:  That's true.

27.  Is this also because you revealed that the FBI is responsible for human trafficking crimes within the United States?

Answer:  I think the agency has been shamed by the human trafficking revelations, and I also think they have been shamed over their treasonous betrayals of American athletes on the world stage.

28.  Do you believe that the exacerbation of harm against your family has been the result of planning by both national and international participants?

Answer:  I do.  There is likely an intent to raid the coffers of the U.S. Treasury in a manner that transcends our borders.

29.  And you have still not been formally informed about funds awarded in your name?

Answer:  No, I have not.

30.  What needs to happen next?

Answer:  Leadership needs to happen next.  I will appreciate outreach on an immediate basis, along with a full investigation of the recent harms of my sons and MX.

31.  In the meantime, you are allowing the publication of your recent texts to your older son, below, in order to illuminate a portion of the impact of the FBI's crimes against your family.

Answer:  Yes, I am.  Keep in mind that I extend these exhortations to him even knowing he has lost his sovereignty.  It's like speaking a prayer to a person in a coma.  He cannot respond.  He cannot save himself.  But in the future, he may remember that I was advocating for him, and this may help him in some manner yet to be elucidated.

32.  You do not believe your words alone can overcome the FBI's sovereignty violations toward your sons and MX.

Answer:  Absolutely not.

33.  Can their sovereignty be returned to them?

Answer:  If we are a worthy nation, we will insist on finding out.

34.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Nowhere On Earth

 1.  Who would have sold out the USA gymnasts through paying Larry Nassar as an FBI informant running "background checks" while he was abusing those virtuous girls and young women who were representing our nation?

Answer:  Obviously, that initiative originated with an adversary of the United States, someone who felt that it was satisfying to harm those formally representing the United States at the highest level in athletic competition, and particularly in the realm of gymnastics.  I would expect that the originator of those acts represented a nation that competes with the U.S. internationally in women's gymnastics competitions -- a nation that believes that, were the USA gymnasts incapacitated, they might be dominant.

2.  You're talking about Russia or China.

Answer:  Russia and/or China would represent reasonably deduced answers here.  I think the American people deserve to know where these directives originated, who within the FBI was paid to advance them, and further, what other teams may be suffering from harm in various manifestations due to similarly competitive initiatives.

For example, it was documented that the U.S. men's swimming team during the Paris Olympics appeared to be intentionally undermined by an improper training schedule immediately before critical team competitions.

3.  The men on the U.S. swim team apparently felt betrayed by what transpired, I understand.

Answer:  Yes, they did.

So, we would want to know what happened there.  The FBI or FBI affiliates were likely pressuring the coaches with threats and bribes, and so we would want to illuminate these events and fully understand their origin.

4.  Who won the men's 4 x 100 relay in swimming at the Paris Olympics?

Answer:  China.

5.  Because the United States is is normally dominant in this event.

Answer:  Without question.

6.  Some of the Chinese swimmers had earlier tested positive for a banned substance that was ruled to be the result of unexplained contamination within a restaurant.

Answer:  This was reported, yes.

7.  What is going on here?

Answer:  The United States is experiencing fundamental problems with sovereignty due to the corruption of the FBI and FBI-affiliated agencies, and the world-class U.S. athletes who are some of the most visible and dominant representatives of U.S. competition on the global stage are paying a high price.  That's what's going on.

8.  How critical is it that the FBI's crimes against the American public in the realm of human trafficking be illuminated at this juncture?

Answer:  How critical is the future of the American people?  Those questions are one and the same.

9.  You feel righteous indignation over this issue.

Answer:  Every American is going to feel righteous indignation over this issue.  The human trafficking crimes of the FBI and its affiliates represent such a fundamental assault on our nation's families and communities -- and such a profound betrayal of everything the FBI is meant to stand for in defending the nation -- that righteous indignation is the least of the feelings the public is going to bring to this matter.

10.  Did the FBI offer to remodel your home on Cape Cod if you kept quiet about this?

Answer:  That appeared to be something the agency was suggesting, albeit indirectly.

11.  What is your response to that suggestion?

Answer:  Do I seem like the type of person who would sell out America's children in return for a remodeled house?

12.  No, you don't.

Answer:  Thank you very much.

13.  What needs to happen regarding this matter?

Answer:  We need to understand who is paying off the FBI to undermine the nation, and we need to comprehend whether those payments are also being directed to key figures within the United States' military and within other spheres as well.

14.  What will happen if we don't?

Answer:  Adversarial nations will continue to cause the American public appalling harms in the realm of human trafficking and other realms having nothing whatsoever to do with our nation's goals, and the FBI will continue to help them.

15.  Has the FBI acted in treasonous ways toward the American public pertaining to human trafficking?

Answer:  I believe the FBI has done so, yes.  And I also suspect that FBI affiliates have acted in treasonous ways when in comes to drug trafficking that has harmed countless American citizens.

Again, neither human trafficking nor drug trafficking have anything whatsoever to do with the mission and objectives of the FBI or its affiliate agencies.  This is important to keep in mind.

16.  Human trafficking and drug trafficking do not meet any national objectives of the FBI, whether concealed or overt.   Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct.

However, these are highly lucrative "businesses" that are controlled by organized crime figures within the United States and elsewhere, and those funds are being funneled to certain key figures within the FBI and elsewhere, without doubt.

The American public can be disabled by human trafficking and drug trafficking crimes perpetrated by the FBI, with a portion of Americans losing their lives over these forms of enslavement.

And with a disabled public, the interests of our foreign adversaries are greatly advanced.

17.  You want outreach concerning these crimes against your family, and you want outreach concerning these crimes against our nation.  Is that true?

Answer:  Oh, yes.

18.  Isn't the FBI continuing to engage in knowingly falsified reporting against your family?

Answer:  I would say that the knowingly falsified reporting by the FBI has accelerated, not abated, over recent days.

19.  What are the reasons for this?

Answer:  Obviously, the FBI is attempting to avoid accountability with regard to its own predation toward the American public in the realm of human trafficking.  So, there is an exacerbation of falsified law enforcement information concerning my family and myself.

20.  Isn't it likely that the FBI was offering to remodel your house on Cape Cod only to claim that you accepted those improvements as a bribe from Russia or China for malfeasance of which you and and your husband know nothing whatsoever?

Answer:  This would be a typical pattern for the agency.  The FBI appears incapable of acknowledging its own guilt.  Instead, it projects all of its own crimes onto its victims.  This is an institutional culture, deeply ingrained, and it represents a terrible flaw within the organization and a pressing problem for the nation as a whole.

21.  Is the FBI, having betrayed the national interest through human trafficking crimes toward the American people, still worthy of the public trust?

Answer:  Let's ask the American public that question, and let's be certain they know all the facts as they decide upon their answer.

22.  You have said that the American public is a sleeping giant.

Answer:  The giant is not always asleep, and no one should be counting on the giant's indefinite slumber regarding this issue.

23.  You want outreach regarding your case on an immediate basis, and you want outreach regarding the human trafficking crimes against the American public as a whole.  Is that right?

Answer:  I don't know how many times I have to say this.  Yes.  Lawful and honorable outreach is necessary at this time.

24.  Is there a greater or more determined love than that you feel for America's children?

Answer:  Nowhere on earth.

25.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, March 24, 2025

OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including, but not limited to, those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

The FBI Lost This Case

OIG Hotline, there is an apparent suggestion by the FBI that awards extended in my name through your auspices and that of the ODNI may be argued by attorneys for the FBI itself to be unconstitutional, with the agency's intention of subsequently misappropriating already designated funds.

Clearly, what is unconstitutional is the FBI's theft of funds intended to address the FBI's flagrant abuse, misconduct, and predation in this case.

If the case itself were unconstitutional, the Supreme Court would have refused to hear it.

Yet the Highest Court has, according to the FBI, spent great time and effort on this matter, including rendering myriad judgements in my favor, not the least of which is reported to be an Order that FOIA reports and investigative reports be provided to me.

Concealment of this case has allowed the FBI altogether too much judicial leeway.

If the FBI chooses to make the argument that future judgements should be handled in a different manner, that argument may be considered.

But the agency should not be enabled to retroactively invalidate a legal process in which the agency has played an astonishingly active, if consistently dishonest, role.

The FBI lost this case.

That doesn't mean that the agency is now allowed to question its constitutionality with a view toward misappropriating judgements against it as perpetrator.

That means that the FBI lost.

How public that loss becomes is a matter for discussion, no doubt, but the fundamentals of the agency's violations of my rights and those of my family members cannot be in doubt.

Thank you for allowing me to express this concern.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, March 23, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

OIG, Please Access Communications Sent to Your Attention Within Lanemacwilliams@gmail.com.

 

In Light of This Revelation

 1.  Has Congress been informed that the FBI was, in fact, paying child predator Larry Nassar to conduct "background checks" of the USA gymnasts as he was facilitating the agency's filming of his child abuse?

Answer:  I believe it has.

2.  And what is Congress' response to this outrage, please?

Answer:  I have no information about Congress' response, but I can say that the only possible response of a human being to this information is shock, dismay, and horror.

3.  In light of this revelation, have the President and Congress insisted that you be provided with FOIA reports and investigative reports pertaining to your case?

Answer:  I would expect that they have done so, yes.

4.  And have you received those reports as of this time?

Answer:  I have not.

5.  Has the FBI once again appeared to remove them from the U.S. Postal Service?

Answer:  This would appear to be the case.

6.  Was the agency claiming all the while that you had received them?

Answer:  Lies along this line would be completely consistent with the continuous deceit and prevarication coming from this agency.

7.  Is the FBI continuing to produce knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting regarding your sons?

Answer:  I must assume that the FBI's assertions that it is directing one or both of my sons to accept or transfer items that could be misinterpreted as contraband for terrorists is based on the agency's total control over my sons' conduct.  If the FBI directs them to move a box from person A to person B, they are going to comply at this point.

8.  Have your sons lost their sovereignty to the FBI?

Answer:  Oh, yes.

9.  So their ability to tell the FBI "No, I am not going to comply with your directive in this case" is ...

Answer:  Non-existent.

10.  Is the FBI attempting to turn your sons into terrorists before the reports can reach you?  Is this the agency's idea of thoroughly discrediting your family?

Answer:  The FBI could direct my sons and MX to do anything at this point, and that conduct would be a total, uncontested reflection of the FBI itself.  That's what the loss of sovereignty entails -- the rendering of previously independent citizens into functional wards of the state, automatons who are completely dependent on directives and permission for the smallest acts.

Do you want a sip of water?  Your handler is going to need to approve it.

This is the control the FBI is exerting over my sons and MX at this time.

11.  If our government is currently unable to stand up to the FBI's criminal harm, having nothing whatsoever to do with its mission and objectives, what are the odds that that ability will emerge in the future?

Answer:  They're zero.  The FBI is not suddenly going to grow a conscience and stop terrorizing the American public in a manner that is separate and apart from the agency's mission and objectives.  And it is not going to halt its improper deployments of harm in seeking to control the public in gratuitous ways.  So, if our leaders cannot stand up to the agency now, that confrontation is not going to happen in any meaningful measure in the future.

12.  How do you yourself feel about all of this?

Answer:  Appalled.  I want to hear our leaders stepping up forcefully and determinedly to say "No, it is not acceptable that the public is being victimized in gratuitous ways by this unethical agency."

13.  What about the mission and objectives of the FBI that have been approved?  Do the agency's gratuitous predations place its approved goals at risk?

Answer:  I think you're asking whether the FBI can be replaced by an agency that will hold strictly to mission and objectives for as long as necessary and then immediately pivot to other priorities when instructed to do so.

And I think the answer is yes.  

14.  What do you make of the FBI's description of your sons as "marked men" because the agency is so frightened of the truth they might tell about having been raped, trafficked and abused at agency directives?

Answer:  I don't think my sons should be suffering from so much as a hangnail at this point.  That's what I think of it.  The FBI's ongoing threats to murder my sons and MX, and indeed my whole family, are duly noted.  They do not do the agency credit.

15.  And what about the agency's assertions that your younger son Duncan is being forced to provide egregiously falsified witness statements about your whole family?

Answer:  This is nothing new.  My sons have been subjected to torture by the FBI.  Their witness statements prepared at the directive of agency personnel and affiliates no longer hold any value as a direct result.

16.  Is the agency still falsely accusing you and other family members of "espionage"?

Answer:  I haven't ever seen the agency admit its lies, so I have to assume these FBI deceits are ongoing.

17.  How are you supposed to be profiting from these non-existent crimes?

Answer:  I have no idea.  Has the agency opened up bank accounts in my name and placed money within them?  I honestly don't know.  What I can say is that I have not profited in any way from FBI schemes or unlawful acts.  In truth, I have been deprived of income and savings by the predations of the FBI at every turn.

18.  Are FBI threats of kidnapping you or your family members wrongfully justified on the basis of the FBI's lies about terrorism or espionage of which you have no knowledge?

Answer:  I think they're based on sheer avarice.  The agency simply wants a big payday and is willing to commit gratuitous kidnapping and first-degree murder to get it.  

What is the false justification for such indefensible crimes?  I have no idea, and it hardly matters.

19.  Have you had indications that those kidnapping threats are serious?  

Answer:  I have.  And I think it's likely that the sniping threats, staged car accident threats, threats of drone assault meant to mimic natural disaster and bomb threats against my family are serious as well.

20.  To be clear, you have never consented to harm of any kind perpetrated against your family members, your friends, your acquaintances, your pets, your properties or yourself.  

Answer:  To be clear, I have not and I will not.

21.  Will you please keep us apprised of your family members' health and wellbeing, including that of your pets?

Answer:  Of course I will.

22.  Thank you for sharing your insights this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

OIG Hotline, Please File an Appeal

 1.  Your older son Graham MacWilliams has allegedly contracted deer prion disease due to malfeasance by the FBI, utilizing a vector you would prefer not to disclose here.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  Deer prion disease is very much like BSE in that it leads to a horrible death with insanity along the way.  Normally, it's not a risk for anyone who is not eating diseased venison.

Answer:  This is all accurate, yes.

3.  And what is the conveyance of this horrible illness meant to compel your older son to do?

Answer:  Well, I would be quick to point out that this is not the only cause of my older son's loss of sovereignty, by any means.  There have also been other horrific violations of his sovereignty and his free will through means that have had an even greater impact on his decision-making.

But in answer to your question, without sovereignty, a victim of the FBI can be compelled to do anything.  Their free will has been stolen from them.  Their fundamental personhood has been violated.  Their personality, their ethics, and their moral frame of reference has been destroyed.  So, there are no limits in these cases.  And both of my sons, Graham MacWilliams and Duncan MacWillians, as well as MX, have been egregiously harmed in this manner.

4.  What wrong has the FBI specifically instructed your older son to commit relating to the agency's conveyance of deer prion disease to him?

Answer:  The FBI has directed him to cause direct harm to me, according to the FBI's own allegations.

5.  Through violence?

Answer:  Yes, this is what the FBI appears to allege.  The agency seems to say that he has been provided with a weapon of some kind within his backpack and that he is meant to utilize it when he is in the house alone with me at some point.

6.  Is this supposed to be a firearm?

Answer:  I don't have that information.  My older son has been forced to learn to shoot a firearm as well as to wield a knife and other weapons by an FBI-affiliate agency that forcibly conscripted him into a program he was not qualified to consent to.

Recently, the FBI has expressed that it intends to invalidate his Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney documentation, which explain that any concealed document prepared by the FBI and its affiliates are invalid due to his disability.

7.  The FBI would like to invalidate your son's POA documentation immediately prior to taking his life?

Answer:  Presumably.  The FBI appears to be trying to set up an "event cascade," in which they could compel my son to invalidate his POA documents, extract false witness statements from him concerning his childhood and our family, direct him to cause physical harm to me, and take his life in an alleged law enforcement response to my harm.

This strikes the FBI as "neatness" and a "job well done," mainly because every event in the cascade appears to exonerate the agency and its affiliates while condemning the FBI's victims.

8.  Do your son's POA documents remain valid as of this moment?

Answer:  I don't have that information, but I believe the FBI has been actively attempting to invalidate them.  So, their safety is in doubt.

9.  How recently do you feel your life has been placed at risk by this circumstance?

Answer:  Yesterday.

10.  Yesterday in your home?

Answer:  Yes.

11.  Your son's handler directed him to cause harm to you yesterday in your home?

Answer:  The directive was apparently given for him to act if given an opportunity.

12.  You were able to perceive the risk of violence?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  That potential was highly palpable.

13.  How, may I ask?

Answer:  During normal conversation, my son became completely silent, stopped responding altogether, and became oriented toward an internal focus, presumably of active directives.  The expression that overtook his face was absolutely horrible, utterly unlike him.  He was barely recognizable facially, in the sense that he was no longer animated by his own personality, values, or principles.  And the possibility of violence hung in the air like a latent potential -- like a gathering storm -- like the electrical charge gathers before lightning.

14.  Were you frightened of your own son?

Answer:  Honestly, it wasn't him in that moment.  He had been separated from himself by a corrupt FBI and corrupt FBI affiliates.  Was I frightened of the murderous intent of the FBI facing me in my own family room?  It's fair to say that the situation was alarming.

15.  Is there any way to put your family back together after the horrific crimes of the FBI toward you?

Answer:  I would hasten to state that the FBI has co-opted other agencies and other criminal actors in its harm of my family.

Is there a way to rescue the sovereignty of all individual members of my family?  Is there a way to speak the truth to one another about the crimes that have been committed against us?  Is there a way to restore our deep bonds?  Is there a way to reclaim our physical and cognitive health?

I wouldn't be here if I did not believe that were possible.

16.  Have you received FOIA or investigative reports at this time?

Answer:  I have not.

17.  Will you?

Answer:  I believe President Trump made the decision to provide them to me in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling, so I certainly hope so.

18.  Has the FBI removed the reports from the mail once more?

Answer:  It would appear so.

19.  What is the answer?

Answer:  I traveled all the way to Washington, DC to facilitate courier delivery.  So, there are answers here.  

20.  There was a suggestion yesterday that your neighbors Ron and Rhonda Hyver were directed to install yet another harmful device placing your husband and you yourself at direct risk.  Do you have reason to believe this might be true?

Answer:  I do.

21.  Any thoughts?

Answer:  Clearly, that device should not be deployed, nor should any other harm against us.

22.  You're also facing extensive kidnapping threats from the FBI, mostly pertaining to you, but also threatening other family members.

Answer:  That's true.

23.  Is that exclusively about ransom?

Answer:  No, I think it's about ransom to the FBI and first-degree murder by the FBI, both.

24.  Is your stalker proposing a marriage that is intended to result in your murder?

Answer:  Apparently so.  It seems like half the films and book that are being recommended to me online have titles such as "Death on a Honeymoon," and "Murder of the Bride."  Certain types of sadists actually seek consent from their victims, it should be explained.  So, this is what I seem to be dealing with, unfortunately.

25.  What is your response to that suggestion?

Answer:  I have had better proposals.  

I prefer life, healing, character, integrity. courage, virtue and genuine bonds.

26.  You do not consent to your own harm nor to the harm of your family members.

Answer:  Not now, not ever.

27.  Do you believe that there is a potential for a contribution to the longterm freedom of mankind if you are provided with reports that do not demonstrate redactions and omissions?

Answer:  Yes, I believe that's possible.

28.  Are there others who desire to support that sovereignty?

Answer:  We all need to hope and pray that there are.

29. Does an appeal need to be filed immediately to ensure that your life and the lives of your loved ones are no longer under threat?

Answer:  I believe it does, yes.

30.  Do you ask for that appeal to be pursued most rigorously?

Answer:  Yes, I do.

31.  Will you please let us know whether you receive the reports the Supreme Court and President Trump have intended that you should have?

Answer:  Yes, I will.

32.  Will you please let us know how you and your family members are faring under these astonishing circumstances?

Answer:  Absolutely.

33.  Before closing, you adopted two puppies recently.  How has that been proceeding?

Answer:  We need a puppy trainer, which the FBI is preventing us from obtaining.  But in general, the puppies are concerned with love, not money, and so it's a solace to spend time with little beings who know what's important.

Their joy is not dependent upon their Bitcoin account, and that's a colossal relief.

34.  How many people has your stalker paid off in order to attempt to continue to cause your family appalling harm?

Answer:  How many people has he not paid off?  This is a shorter and more manageable list.

35.  Is the nation's longterm sovereignty important enough to now treat you honorably, fairly and respectfully regarding this matter?

Answer:  That's what we're about to find out.

36.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams