FORMAL NOTIFICATION OF LACK OF ALL CONFIDENTIALITY REQUESTS FROM THE FBI

Federal Bureau of Investigation:

You and your affiliates have engaged in knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against my family and myself in a case which you decisively lost before the Supreme Court.

FOIA reports and investigative reports are now due to me on an immediate basis.

Your ongoing efforts, through the effects of torture and individual sovereignty violations, to task my two sons with human trafficking assignments, assassinations, animal cruelty, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, terrorism-affiliated crimes, and espionage-related crimes condemn every aspect of your failed agency's corruption and predation.

Your ongoing attempts to impugn the high character of my husband and myself are equally reprehensible.

I requested outreach regarding my case by today, April 2, 2025, explaining that in the absence of any communication from the FBI or its representative by this date, the agency would be communicating to me that it possessed no confidentiality concerns whatsoever regarding my case.

The OIG Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice and the ODNI are said to have awarded more than 8 trillion dollars in my name regarding the FBI's crimes, yet I have not been formally notified of any of those awards.

Instead, the FBI has continued to attempt to take my life and those of my family members through plans of first-degree murder against its betters.

To ensure that the FBI and its affiliates are fully apprised of my understandable assumption, given its unexplained silence in the face of my repeated requests for communication, that the agency has no confidentiality needs regarding this matter, I am publishing this letter publicly, as well as sending a copy to the FBI's FOIA Office, with a copy to the OIG Hotline.

I will grant the FBI until 5:00 PM East Coast time on April 3, 2025 to engage in outreach if the agency possesses any requests for confidentiality regarding my case which it would like to communicate.

My email and phone number are known by the OIG Hotline, which has been investigating this matter on an ongoing basis.

Sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 2, 2025

OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com,.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Outreach

1. You do not recommend that PG&E cut your power tomorrow.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct.  Such an action would be highly inadvisable.

2.  May I ask why?

Answer:  I have sufficient information about PG&E's predations toward my family and my properties specifically that any further aggression whatsoever will be taken as overt, unjustifiable hostility that will require a response involving public exposure of this agency's crimes and many other details of the FBI's criminal predation toward my family.

3.  Would an exception be presented by outreach to you by tomorrow, which you have requested?

Answer:  Outreach will not occur tomorrow if the power is cut.  So, for there to be a power outage on the day of a deadline for outreach -- this would represent an unfortunate signal toward escalation of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting by the FBI and attendant harms.

And that is simply unacceptable to me.

4.  What do you mean by unacceptable?

Answer:  If I do not receive outreach by tomorrow, I will be formally expressing to the FBI that the agency has, in failing to engage in honorable outreach, communicated that it has no confidentiality concerns regarding any aspect of my case whatsoever.

5.  So, if you do not receive honorable outreach by tomorrow, the FBI will be giving you permission to discuss all of its crimes against you publicly.  

Answer:  It most certainly will.

6.  Do you believe that any aspect of your case may be considered confidential by the FBI or any of its affiliates?

Answer:  I don't have any idea.  I'm a civilian.  That's why I have repeatedly asked for honorable outreach concerning this matter -- so that appropriate, peaceable communication can take place that includes any and all expression of confidentiality concerns that could possibly exist.  

Any viable federal law enforcement agency would respond to such a request with professional and peaceable outreach.  In that absence of that, it is reasonable to assume that there are no confidentiality concerns on the part of the FBI or any of its affiliates pertaining to this case.

7.  Will you please let us know if you experience a power outage tomorrow?  

Answer:  I may not be able to do so in real time due to the impediments to communication, but yes, I will post on my blog as soon as I am able to do so.

8.  The FBI appears to be suggesting that it has coerced one or both of your sons into providing knowingly false witness statements intended to wrongfully justify a raid on your household tomorrow, during a power outage inappropriately facilitated by PG&E.  Is that your understanding?

Answer:  The FBI appears to be making this suggestion, yes.

9.  What is your perspective regarding this threat?

Answer:  The FBI needs to find another line of work.  This cycle of torture, coerced false witness statements, and threatened law enforcement raids is a dystopian system that needs to be retired completely.

10.  What do you think about the FBI's renewed threats of conveying tuberculosis, HIV, and many other acute illnesses to your family members or to you yourself, in addition to the threats of cancer, car accident, arson, wildfire, staged plane accident, intentional brain damage, kidnapping, arrest, predation toward your pets, and countless other harms?

Answer:  Again, these standard operating procedures on the part of the FBI simply need to be shelved.  They're deeply wrong from an ethical perspective.  No worthy court of law is going to uphold such harms, knowing that they are based on false witness statements extracted under torture.

11.  Does President Trump hold the power to pull the FBI into line?

Answer:  This has been the hope.

12.  Has that hope materialized?

Answer:  I do not yet have outreach, but I hope it will be soon forthcoming.

13.  Outreach would tell you what?

Answer:  That President Trump is running the country as an effective and conscientious chief executive who is not going to tolerate an FBI that trafficks, tortures and preys upon our youth and others in a manner that stands completely separate and apart from mission and objectives.

14.  And the lack of outreach would tell you what?

Answer:  That organized crime has taken over, with the FBI and the CIA as its chief representatives, often advancing the interests of the foreign adversaries of the United States.

15.  Will you be writing more about this if there is no honorable outreach extended to you by the end of the business day tomorrow?

Answer:  Much more.

16.  Specifically because the FBI will be communicating that it has no confidentiality concerns regarding your case whatsoever?

Answer:  Exactly so.

17.  You are not willing to suffer additional health harms to your family members, your pets or you yourself perpetrated by a wayward FBI or by anyone.  

Answer:  No, I am not.

18.  And you are no longer willing to wear a gas mask in your own home, check for radon gas constantly, measure ionizing radiation "hotspots," be constantly on guard for infectious disease caused by both environmental and non-conventional vectors.

Answer:  No, I am not.

19.  You traveled to Washington, D.C. in order to make yourself available to the DOJ and to facilitate the conveyance of FOIA and investigative reports due to you, in addition to traveling to Cape Cod and then back home, communicating honorably to District Attorneys, police departments and sheriff's offices all the while.  So, you now feel done with law enforcement corruption.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  When law enforcement does not accept your open invitation to an honorable conversation, there is no truthful law enforcement reporting going on.  It's all a sham, and those perpetrating it know perfectly well it's a sham.  By offering to assist them in their work by speaking to them directly, I simply called their bluff.  These people had nothing to say.  Zero.  And that says it all.

20.  They're lying.

Answer:  They're lying, and they've been lying the whole time.  And those lies are being utilized to hurt the best Americans we have.  

So, once again, we're facing a problem with law enforcement corruption in which law enforcement personnel are doing the bidding of our foreign adversaries who want to see us weak, disorganized, confused, sick, dying, impoverished and undone as a nation.

21.  You want more for us.

Answer:  Yes, I do.  I expect more for the United States and that means that outreach needs to occur regarding this matter, and it needs to occur right away.

22.  Please keep us updated with regard to the simple question of whether PG&E cuts your power tomorrow.

Answer:  I will do my best.

23.  If an attorney contacts you, will you be updating us?

Answer:  An attorney may request confidentiality during discussion, and I would be inclined to honor that request.

24.  For what reason?

Answer:  If someone is engaging in outreach in good faith, it's appropriate to converse with them with an understanding of their concerns.

25.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, April 1, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including, but not limited to, those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Crimes Against Human Sovereignty By the FBI

1.  What is it like to have your older son unlawfully tasked with "cleaning" assignments or worse by his corrupt handler within the CIA?

Answer:  To be clear, the CIA is acting as an FBI contractor in this case, because the CIA only forcibly recruited my older son at FBI initiative.

But in answer to your question, the experience is horrific and stands in direct repudiation of all human decency and societal virtue.

2.  Your son has a disability which, through your Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney, has invalidated his prior agreements with the CIA.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

3.  Even so, his handler continues to unlawfully task him by threatening his life.  Isn't that so?

Answer:  Yes.

4.  And the threats to his life are not empty.  Rather they have involved the CIA's communication to your son of deadly disease, which his handler refused to treat unless your son follows his handler's directives.  Isn't that accurate?

Answer:  It is accurate.

5.  What wrongful acts did your son's handler direct him to perpetrate last night?

Answer:  I honestly don't know.  This could have constituted a "cleaning" assignment, though the FBI alleges that he was forced to perpetrate harm of some kind.

6.  What is a "cleaning assignment"?

Answer:  It is the forced desecration of a human corpse through dismemberment following a first-degree murder committed by the FBI or its affiliates.  And I'm sure it involves an attempt to erase evidence that a violent crime has been committed.

7.  When your son's handler has forced him to perpetrate harm in the past, what has that harm consisted of?  Torture?  Rape?  Murder?

Answer:  I don't know.  What I can say is that my son has lost his sovereignty as a direct result of the FBI's crimes against him and against our family. So his handler could direct him to do anything and he would be unable to refuse.

8.  What methods are utilized in stealing the sovereignty of an American citizen?

Answer:  In my older son's case, torture, rape, trafficking, and the conveyance of deadly disease have all been utilized, in addition to numerous other "methods" routinely used by the FBI as mechanisms of control over targeted members of the American public.

9.  You have recently disclosed that the FBI is heavily involved in the trafficking of American citizens.  Is the agency attempting to discredit your family as a result?  Is this why your son was given a wrongful directive by his handler last night?

Answer:  Honestly, it seems to be about discrediting my family, yes.  But I think the larger objective is to attempt to extract false witness statements from my older son that would allow a wrongful law enforcement raid on our home.

10.  With a violent intent?

Answer:  Yes, with a violent intent.

11.  And is the plan oriented toward the misappropriation of funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI?

Answer:  It appears to be, yes.

12.  So, really, this is about greed.  Avarice.

Answer:  I believe that greed is the driving force behind these crimes against my family -- this insatiable hunger for money.

13.  Who is participating in these crimes against your family as perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates at this time?

Answer:  This is an important question, certainly.  Who knows about them?  Who is authorizing them?  Who is seeking to profit from them?

14.  The FBI has routinely threatened, having stolen your son's sovereignty, to direct him to commit public harm toward innocents, has it not?

Answer:  Yes, it has.

15.  Do you think the FBI, through its experiments with sovereignty violations, is responsible for a certain percentage of mass shootings in the public sphere?

Answer:  This is occurring, without doubt.  The question is to what degree.  Is the FBI responsible for fifty percent of mass shootings in the United States?  Eighty percent?  Ninety?  There is direct culpability for the agency in a majority of these crimes.

Again, I am not disclosing here the full range of methods the FBI is utilizing in sovereignty violations.  But the tools are extensive, and when I say sovereignty violations, I am really talking about a total usurpation of independent human will.

16.  A total overthrow of the individual's ability to make his or her own decisions?

Answer:  Complete.  Yes.  There are no vestiges left of the individual's capacity to reject wrongful directives from his handler.  

17.  What is it like to witness these violations perpetrated by the FBI against your own children?

Answer:  What is the scariest horror film you have ever seen?  Multiply it by one thousand.

18.  You have said that all of your efforts to invest your sons with an unshakeable ethical framework, guiding principles, and a moral reference frame to aid them in decision-making throughout life have been effectively erased by a predatory FBI in an astonishingly short period of time.

Answer:  The loss of sovereignty makes no exceptions for the children of those of us who were excellent, attentive and loving parents.  All of that human investment in raising wonderful young men and women is simply wiped out by these predatory and inhuman stratagems of sovereignty violation being deployed by the FBI.

19.  If this matter is not illuminated further, how do you evaluate the future freedoms of Americans as a whole?

Answer:  They are utterly forfeit.

If this nation cannot muster the will to care about my children, it will care about no one's children.

The FBI's sovereignty violations make a mockery of the Constitution, and the agency knows it well.

So without proper accountability in this case, there can be no future freedoms, and we cannot expect we will have another chance to rescue them.

20.  Why not?

Answer:  There's already a tremendous knowledge gap between the public's awareness of tools being wielded by the FBI and the FBI's active deployment of those modalities, and this chasm is rapidly expanding.  There will not come a future time in which we can pause to consider the effects of the FBI's virtual enslavement and exploitation of the public through the co-opting of the human will.  That moment is now, not later.

21.  Should the communications devices of the FBI and its affiliates have been removed from your sons and MX the moment it was determined that sovereignty violations were occurring?

Answer:  That very instant, yes.

22.  And did you request this?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  I requested it endlessly.

23.  Yet those communications devices are still in place?

Answer:  Yes, they are.

24.  Is this a failure of the DOJ?  Is this a failure of a judicial process?  Why were those communications devices not removed?

Answer:  These are important questions, and their answers deserve our full attention as a nation.

25.  Can't your sons' handlers be stopped?  Can't the White House forcefully direct them to stop?

Answer:  Again, these are critical questions, and I'm glad you're giving voice to them.

26.  The FBI has also recently conveyed serious illness to you and to your pets.  It's not only your sons who are experiencing the terrible harms the agency is now wielding against you.

Answer:  That's true.

27.  Is this also because you revealed that the FBI is responsible for human trafficking crimes within the United States?

Answer:  I think the agency has been shamed by the human trafficking revelations, and I also think they have been shamed over their treasonous betrayals of American athletes on the world stage.

28.  Do you believe that the exacerbation of harm against your family has been the result of planning by both national and international participants?

Answer:  I do.  There is likely an intent to raid the coffers of the U.S. Treasury in a manner that transcends our borders.

29.  And you have still not been formally informed about funds awarded in your name?

Answer:  No, I have not.

30.  What needs to happen next?

Answer:  Leadership needs to happen next.  I will appreciate outreach on an immediate basis, along with a full investigation of the recent harms of my sons and MX.

31.  In the meantime, you are allowing the publication of your recent texts to your older son, below, in order to illuminate a portion of the impact of the FBI's crimes against your family.

Answer:  Yes, I am.  Keep in mind that I extend these exhortations to him even knowing he has lost his sovereignty.  It's like speaking a prayer to a person in a coma.  He cannot respond.  He cannot save himself.  But in the future, he may remember that I was advocating for him, and this may help him in some manner yet to be elucidated.

32.  You do not believe your words alone can overcome the FBI's sovereignty violations toward your sons and MX.

Answer:  Absolutely not.

33.  Can their sovereignty be returned to them?

Answer:  If we are a worthy nation, we will insist on finding out.

34.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Nowhere On Earth

 1.  Who would have sold out the USA gymnasts through paying Larry Nassar as an FBI informant running "background checks" while he was abusing those virtuous girls and young women who were representing our nation?

Answer:  Obviously, that initiative originated with an adversary of the United States, someone who felt that it was satisfying to harm those formally representing the United States at the highest level in athletic competition, and particularly in the realm of gymnastics.  I would expect that the originator of those acts represented a nation that competes with the U.S. internationally in women's gymnastics competitions -- a nation that believes that, were the USA gymnasts incapacitated, they might be dominant.

2.  You're talking about Russia or China.

Answer:  Russia and/or China would represent reasonably deduced answers here.  I think the American people deserve to know where these directives originated, who within the FBI was paid to advance them, and further, what other teams may be suffering from harm in various manifestations due to similarly competitive initiatives.

For example, it was documented that the U.S. men's swimming team during the Paris Olympics appeared to be intentionally undermined by an improper training schedule immediately before critical team competitions.

3.  The men on the U.S. swim team apparently felt betrayed by what transpired, I understand.

Answer:  Yes, they did.

So, we would want to know what happened there.  The FBI or FBI affiliates were likely pressuring the coaches with threats and bribes, and so we would want to illuminate these events and fully understand their origin.

4.  Who won the men's 4 x 100 relay in swimming at the Paris Olympics?

Answer:  China.

5.  Because the United States is is normally dominant in this event.

Answer:  Without question.

6.  Some of the Chinese swimmers had earlier tested positive for a banned substance that was ruled to be the result of unexplained contamination within a restaurant.

Answer:  This was reported, yes.

7.  What is going on here?

Answer:  The United States is experiencing fundamental problems with sovereignty due to the corruption of the FBI and FBI-affiliated agencies, and the world-class U.S. athletes who are some of the most visible and dominant representatives of U.S. competition on the global stage are paying a high price.  That's what's going on.

8.  How critical is it that the FBI's crimes against the American public in the realm of human trafficking be illuminated at this juncture?

Answer:  How critical is the future of the American people?  Those questions are one and the same.

9.  You feel righteous indignation over this issue.

Answer:  Every American is going to feel righteous indignation over this issue.  The human trafficking crimes of the FBI and its affiliates represent such a fundamental assault on our nation's families and communities -- and such a profound betrayal of everything the FBI is meant to stand for in defending the nation -- that righteous indignation is the least of the feelings the public is going to bring to this matter.

10.  Did the FBI offer to remodel your home on Cape Cod if you kept quiet about this?

Answer:  That appeared to be something the agency was suggesting, albeit indirectly.

11.  What is your response to that suggestion?

Answer:  Do I seem like the type of person who would sell out America's children in return for a remodeled house?

12.  No, you don't.

Answer:  Thank you very much.

13.  What needs to happen regarding this matter?

Answer:  We need to understand who is paying off the FBI to undermine the nation, and we need to comprehend whether those payments are also being directed to key figures within the United States' military and within other spheres as well.

14.  What will happen if we don't?

Answer:  Adversarial nations will continue to cause the American public appalling harms in the realm of human trafficking and other realms having nothing whatsoever to do with our nation's goals, and the FBI will continue to help them.

15.  Has the FBI acted in treasonous ways toward the American public pertaining to human trafficking?

Answer:  I believe the FBI has done so, yes.  And I also suspect that FBI affiliates have acted in treasonous ways when in comes to drug trafficking that has harmed countless American citizens.

Again, neither human trafficking nor drug trafficking have anything whatsoever to do with the mission and objectives of the FBI or its affiliate agencies.  This is important to keep in mind.

16.  Human trafficking and drug trafficking do not meet any national objectives of the FBI, whether concealed or overt.   Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct.

However, these are highly lucrative "businesses" that are controlled by organized crime figures within the United States and elsewhere, and those funds are being funneled to certain key figures within the FBI and elsewhere, without doubt.

The American public can be disabled by human trafficking and drug trafficking crimes perpetrated by the FBI, with a portion of Americans losing their lives over these forms of enslavement.

And with a disabled public, the interests of our foreign adversaries are greatly advanced.

17.  You want outreach concerning these crimes against your family, and you want outreach concerning these crimes against our nation.  Is that true?

Answer:  Oh, yes.

18.  Isn't the FBI continuing to engage in knowingly falsified reporting against your family?

Answer:  I would say that the knowingly falsified reporting by the FBI has accelerated, not abated, over recent days.

19.  What are the reasons for this?

Answer:  Obviously, the FBI is attempting to avoid accountability with regard to its own predation toward the American public in the realm of human trafficking.  So, there is an exacerbation of falsified law enforcement information concerning my family and myself.

20.  Isn't it likely that the FBI was offering to remodel your house on Cape Cod only to claim that you accepted those improvements as a bribe from Russia or China for malfeasance of which you and and your husband know nothing whatsoever?

Answer:  This would be a typical pattern for the agency.  The FBI appears incapable of acknowledging its own guilt.  Instead, it projects all of its own crimes onto its victims.  This is an institutional culture, deeply ingrained, and it represents a terrible flaw within the organization and a pressing problem for the nation as a whole.

21.  Is the FBI, having betrayed the national interest through human trafficking crimes toward the American people, still worthy of the public trust?

Answer:  Let's ask the American public that question, and let's be certain they know all the facts as they decide upon their answer.

22.  You have said that the American public is a sleeping giant.

Answer:  The giant is not always asleep, and no one should be counting on the giant's indefinite slumber regarding this issue.

23.  You want outreach regarding your case on an immediate basis, and you want outreach regarding the human trafficking crimes against the American public as a whole.  Is that right?

Answer:  I don't know how many times I have to say this.  Yes.  Lawful and honorable outreach is necessary at this time.

24.  Is there a greater or more determined love than that you feel for America's children?

Answer:  Nowhere on earth.

25.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, March 24, 2025

OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including, but not limited to, those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

The FBI Lost This Case

OIG Hotline, there is an apparent suggestion by the FBI that awards extended in my name through your auspices and that of the ODNI may be argued by attorneys for the FBI itself to be unconstitutional, with the agency's intention of subsequently misappropriating already designated funds.

Clearly, what is unconstitutional is the FBI's theft of funds intended to address the FBI's flagrant abuse, misconduct, and predation in this case.

If the case itself were unconstitutional, the Supreme Court would have refused to hear it.

Yet the Highest Court has, according to the FBI, spent great time and effort on this matter, including rendering myriad judgements in my favor, not the least of which is reported to be an Order that FOIA reports and investigative reports be provided to me.

Concealment of this case has allowed the FBI altogether too much judicial leeway.

If the FBI chooses to make the argument that future judgements should be handled in a different manner, that argument may be considered.

But the agency should not be enabled to retroactively invalidate a legal process in which the agency has played an astonishingly active, if consistently dishonest, role.

The FBI lost this case.

That doesn't mean that the agency is now allowed to question its constitutionality with a view toward misappropriating judgements against it as perpetrator.

That means that the FBI lost.

How public that loss becomes is a matter for discussion, no doubt, but the fundamentals of the agency's violations of my rights and those of my family members cannot be in doubt.

Thank you for allowing me to express this concern.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, March 23, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

OIG, Please Access Communications Sent to Your Attention Within Lanemacwilliams@gmail.com.

 

In Light of This Revelation

 1.  Has Congress been informed that the FBI was, in fact, paying child predator Larry Nassar to conduct "background checks" of the USA gymnasts as he was facilitating the agency's filming of his child abuse?

Answer:  I believe it has.

2.  And what is Congress' response to this outrage, please?

Answer:  I have no information about Congress' response, but I can say that the only possible response of a human being to this information is shock, dismay, and horror.

3.  In light of this revelation, have the President and Congress insisted that you be provided with FOIA reports and investigative reports pertaining to your case?

Answer:  I would expect that they have done so, yes.

4.  And have you received those reports as of this time?

Answer:  I have not.

5.  Has the FBI once again appeared to remove them from the U.S. Postal Service?

Answer:  This would appear to be the case.

6.  Was the agency claiming all the while that you had received them?

Answer:  Lies along this line would be completely consistent with the continuous deceit and prevarication coming from this agency.

7.  Is the FBI continuing to produce knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting regarding your sons?

Answer:  I must assume that the FBI's assertions that it is directing one or both of my sons to accept or transfer items that could be misinterpreted as contraband for terrorists is based on the agency's total control over my sons' conduct.  If the FBI directs them to move a box from person A to person B, they are going to comply at this point.

8.  Have your sons lost their sovereignty to the FBI?

Answer:  Oh, yes.

9.  So their ability to tell the FBI "No, I am not going to comply with your directive in this case" is ...

Answer:  Non-existent.

10.  Is the FBI attempting to turn your sons into terrorists before the reports can reach you?  Is this the agency's idea of thoroughly discrediting your family?

Answer:  The FBI could direct my sons and MX to do anything at this point, and that conduct would be a total, uncontested reflection of the FBI itself.  That's what the loss of sovereignty entails -- the rendering of previously independent citizens into functional wards of the state, automatons who are completely dependent on directives and permission for the smallest acts.

Do you want a sip of water?  Your handler is going to need to approve it.

This is the control the FBI is exerting over my sons and MX at this time.

11.  If our government is currently unable to stand up to the FBI's criminal harm, having nothing whatsoever to do with its mission and objectives, what are the odds that that ability will emerge in the future?

Answer:  They're zero.  The FBI is not suddenly going to grow a conscience and stop terrorizing the American public in a manner that is separate and apart from the agency's mission and objectives.  And it is not going to halt its improper deployments of harm in seeking to control the public in gratuitous ways.  So, if our leaders cannot stand up to the agency now, that confrontation is not going to happen in any meaningful measure in the future.

12.  How do you yourself feel about all of this?

Answer:  Appalled.  I want to hear our leaders stepping up forcefully and determinedly to say "No, it is not acceptable that the public is being victimized in gratuitous ways by this unethical agency."

13.  What about the mission and objectives of the FBI that have been approved?  Do the agency's gratuitous predations place its approved goals at risk?

Answer:  I think you're asking whether the FBI can be replaced by an agency that will hold strictly to mission and objectives for as long as necessary and then immediately pivot to other priorities when instructed to do so.

And I think the answer is yes.  

14.  What do you make of the FBI's description of your sons as "marked men" because the agency is so frightened of the truth they might tell about having been raped, trafficked and abused at agency directives?

Answer:  I don't think my sons should be suffering from so much as a hangnail at this point.  That's what I think of it.  The FBI's ongoing threats to murder my sons and MX, and indeed my whole family, are duly noted.  They do not do the agency credit.

15.  And what about the agency's assertions that your younger son Duncan is being forced to provide egregiously falsified witness statements about your whole family?

Answer:  This is nothing new.  My sons have been subjected to torture by the FBI.  Their witness statements prepared at the directive of agency personnel and affiliates no longer hold any value as a direct result.

16.  Is the agency still falsely accusing you and other family members of "espionage"?

Answer:  I haven't ever seen the agency admit its lies, so I have to assume these FBI deceits are ongoing.

17.  How are you supposed to be profiting from these non-existent crimes?

Answer:  I have no idea.  Has the agency opened up bank accounts in my name and placed money within them?  I honestly don't know.  What I can say is that I have not profited in any way from FBI schemes or unlawful acts.  In truth, I have been deprived of income and savings by the predations of the FBI at every turn.

18.  Are FBI threats of kidnapping you or your family members wrongfully justified on the basis of the FBI's lies about terrorism or espionage of which you have no knowledge?

Answer:  I think they're based on sheer avarice.  The agency simply wants a big payday and is willing to commit gratuitous kidnapping and first-degree murder to get it.  

What is the false justification for such indefensible crimes?  I have no idea, and it hardly matters.

19.  Have you had indications that those kidnapping threats are serious?  

Answer:  I have.  And I think it's likely that the sniping threats, staged car accident threats, threats of drone assault meant to mimic natural disaster and bomb threats against my family are serious as well.

20.  To be clear, you have never consented to harm of any kind perpetrated against your family members, your friends, your acquaintances, your pets, your properties or yourself.  

Answer:  To be clear, I have not and I will not.

21.  Will you please keep us apprised of your family members' health and wellbeing, including that of your pets?

Answer:  Of course I will.

22.  Thank you for sharing your insights this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

OIG Hotline, Please File an Appeal

 1.  Your older son Graham MacWilliams has allegedly contracted deer prion disease due to malfeasance by the FBI, utilizing a vector you would prefer not to disclose here.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  Deer prion disease is very much like BSE in that it leads to a horrible death with insanity along the way.  Normally, it's not a risk for anyone who is not eating diseased venison.

Answer:  This is all accurate, yes.

3.  And what is the conveyance of this horrible illness meant to compel your older son to do?

Answer:  Well, I would be quick to point out that this is not the only cause of my older son's loss of sovereignty, by any means.  There have also been other horrific violations of his sovereignty and his free will through means that have had an even greater impact on his decision-making.

But in answer to your question, without sovereignty, a victim of the FBI can be compelled to do anything.  Their free will has been stolen from them.  Their fundamental personhood has been violated.  Their personality, their ethics, and their moral frame of reference has been destroyed.  So, there are no limits in these cases.  And both of my sons, Graham MacWilliams and Duncan MacWillians, as well as MX, have been egregiously harmed in this manner.

4.  What wrong has the FBI specifically instructed your older son to commit relating to the agency's conveyance of deer prion disease to him?

Answer:  The FBI has directed him to cause direct harm to me, according to the FBI's own allegations.

5.  Through violence?

Answer:  Yes, this is what the FBI appears to allege.  The agency seems to say that he has been provided with a weapon of some kind within his backpack and that he is meant to utilize it when he is in the house alone with me at some point.

6.  Is this supposed to be a firearm?

Answer:  I don't have that information.  My older son has been forced to learn to shoot a firearm as well as to wield a knife and other weapons by an FBI-affiliate agency that forcibly conscripted him into a program he was not qualified to consent to.

Recently, the FBI has expressed that it intends to invalidate his Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney documentation, which explain that any concealed document prepared by the FBI and its affiliates are invalid due to his disability.

7.  The FBI would like to invalidate your son's POA documentation immediately prior to taking his life?

Answer:  Presumably.  The FBI appears to be trying to set up an "event cascade," in which they could compel my son to invalidate his POA documents, extract false witness statements from him concerning his childhood and our family, direct him to cause physical harm to me, and take his life in an alleged law enforcement response to my harm.

This strikes the FBI as "neatness" and a "job well done," mainly because every event in the cascade appears to exonerate the agency and its affiliates while condemning the FBI's victims.

8.  Do your son's POA documents remain valid as of this moment?

Answer:  I don't have that information, but I believe the FBI has been actively attempting to invalidate them.  So, their safety is in doubt.

9.  How recently do you feel your life has been placed at risk by this circumstance?

Answer:  Yesterday.

10.  Yesterday in your home?

Answer:  Yes.

11.  Your son's handler directed him to cause harm to you yesterday in your home?

Answer:  The directive was apparently given for him to act if given an opportunity.

12.  You were able to perceive the risk of violence?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  That potential was highly palpable.

13.  How, may I ask?

Answer:  During normal conversation, my son became completely silent, stopped responding altogether, and became oriented toward an internal focus, presumably of active directives.  The expression that overtook his face was absolutely horrible, utterly unlike him.  He was barely recognizable facially, in the sense that he was no longer animated by his own personality, values, or principles.  And the possibility of violence hung in the air like a latent potential -- like a gathering storm -- like the electrical charge gathers before lightning.

14.  Were you frightened of your own son?

Answer:  Honestly, it wasn't him in that moment.  He had been separated from himself by a corrupt FBI and corrupt FBI affiliates.  Was I frightened of the murderous intent of the FBI facing me in my own family room?  It's fair to say that the situation was alarming.

15.  Is there any way to put your family back together after the horrific crimes of the FBI toward you?

Answer:  I would hasten to state that the FBI has co-opted other agencies and other criminal actors in its harm of my family.

Is there a way to rescue the sovereignty of all individual members of my family?  Is there a way to speak the truth to one another about the crimes that have been committed against us?  Is there a way to restore our deep bonds?  Is there a way to reclaim our physical and cognitive health?

I wouldn't be here if I did not believe that were possible.

16.  Have you received FOIA or investigative reports at this time?

Answer:  I have not.

17.  Will you?

Answer:  I believe President Trump made the decision to provide them to me in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling, so I certainly hope so.

18.  Has the FBI removed the reports from the mail once more?

Answer:  It would appear so.

19.  What is the answer?

Answer:  I traveled all the way to Washington, DC to facilitate courier delivery.  So, there are answers here.  

20.  There was a suggestion yesterday that your neighbors Ron and Rhonda Hyver were directed to install yet another harmful device placing your husband and you yourself at direct risk.  Do you have reason to believe this might be true?

Answer:  I do.

21.  Any thoughts?

Answer:  Clearly, that device should not be deployed, nor should any other harm against us.

22.  You're also facing extensive kidnapping threats from the FBI, mostly pertaining to you, but also threatening other family members.

Answer:  That's true.

23.  Is that exclusively about ransom?

Answer:  No, I think it's about ransom to the FBI and first-degree murder by the FBI, both.

24.  Is your stalker proposing a marriage that is intended to result in your murder?

Answer:  Apparently so.  It seems like half the films and book that are being recommended to me online have titles such as "Death on a Honeymoon," and "Murder of the Bride."  Certain types of sadists actually seek consent from their victims, it should be explained.  So, this is what I seem to be dealing with, unfortunately.

25.  What is your response to that suggestion?

Answer:  I have had better proposals.  

I prefer life, healing, character, integrity. courage, virtue and genuine bonds.

26.  You do not consent to your own harm nor to the harm of your family members.

Answer:  Not now, not ever.

27.  Do you believe that there is a potential for a contribution to the longterm freedom of mankind if you are provided with reports that do not demonstrate redactions and omissions?

Answer:  Yes, I believe that's possible.

28.  Are there others who desire to support that sovereignty?

Answer:  We all need to hope and pray that there are.

29. Does an appeal need to be filed immediately to ensure that your life and the lives of your loved ones are no longer under threat?

Answer:  I believe it does, yes.

30.  Do you ask for that appeal to be pursued most rigorously?

Answer:  Yes, I do.

31.  Will you please let us know whether you receive the reports the Supreme Court and President Trump have intended that you should have?

Answer:  Yes, I will.

32.  Will you please let us know how you and your family members are faring under these astonishing circumstances?

Answer:  Absolutely.

33.  Before closing, you adopted two puppies recently.  How has that been proceeding?

Answer:  We need a puppy trainer, which the FBI is preventing us from obtaining.  But in general, the puppies are concerned with love, not money, and so it's a solace to spend time with little beings who know what's important.

Their joy is not dependent upon their Bitcoin account, and that's a colossal relief.

34.  How many people has your stalker paid off in order to attempt to continue to cause your family appalling harm?

Answer:  How many people has he not paid off?  This is a shorter and more manageable list.

35.  Is the nation's longterm sovereignty important enough to now treat you honorably, fairly and respectfully regarding this matter?

Answer:  That's what we're about to find out.

36.  Thank you for speaking with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Happy Birthday to My Beloved Son

 Duncan, my beloved son, I was prevented from wishing you a happy birthday yesterday by threats that you would be harmed if I did so.

As a result, I found myself silenced, when I wanted all day to extend to you the retelling of your miraculous birth, your blessed welcome into this world, and the way, impossibly, you smiled at me when I first held you in my arms.

What a tumultuous journey we had already survived, given the high risk pregnancy that both you and I had endured.

But there, at Stanford Hospital, on St. Patrick's Day of 1997, with a room filled with doctors and nurses ready for any emergency, you simply smiled up at me as if to say "We made it."

We had passed a first critical test that would not be our only one.

Later you enjoyed a childhood in which you were cherished and upheld, but your young adulthood has represented a horrific gauntlet due to a corrupt FBI.

Central to all of the crimes this agency has perpetrated against you is the loss of your personal sovereignty, your individual self-determination, your human right to say "yes," to say "no," to say "I choose this and not that."

And Duncan, I am here to say that your sovereignty must be restored to you in full, generously, abundantly, completely, until it is entirely and irrevocably returned.

Those who have perpetrated human trafficking crimes against America's youth have quite a public reckoning in store.

And those who have separated you from your independent decision-making capability owe you, our family, and our entire nation an apology without end.

The weight of those crimes fall upon the men within the FBI who directed them, not upon you.

The objective of the torturers within the FBI is the same as the objective of all torturers -- to separate their victims from their own knowledge of themselves, and so to cause the greatest spiritual and psychological distress possible.

So, I say this to you in response.

I remember who you are, who you really are, and I am here to recall you to yourself.

There is no human trafficker who can separate me from my knowledge of your fierce spirit.  There is no predator who can make me abandon your virtuous soul.  There is no employee of the FBI who can convince me that you cannot be returned to yourself, and there is no person on this earth who will convince me to stop trying.

I do not relinquish you, my son.

I do not forsake you.

I do not abandon you.

And I never will.

Happy birthday, my beloved son.

I love you with a love that transcends all wrongs against you.

Feel my arms around you,

Mom

A Request for Our Leaders to Insist on America's Sovereignty

 1.  Are your sons' and MX's lives currently under threat pertaining to the trafficking crimes of the FBI and affiliated agencies toward them?

Answer:  Yes, they are.  And beside overt death threats, the FBI is threatening to coerce them into committing crimes against others.

2.  Do you know what crimes the FBI is threatening to coerce them into specifically?

Answer:  No.  But I know the agency is alleging it has engaged in false imprisonment of both of them already, only releasing them with their promise to comply with all agency directives.

3.  Both of your sons have been directed by the FBI and its affiliates to cause harm to members of your own family, haven't they?

Answer:  Yes, they have, monstrously enough.

4.  What are your thoughts about the FBI's actions in this case?

Answer:  This simply represents one of the worst possible manifestations of corrupt law enforcement imaginable.  We might see these sort of atrocities manifesting in North Korea or other totalitarian regimes.  It manifests the extremes of failing "national security" institutions in preying upon the honorable public.

5.  And what has been the result of these FBI directives?

Answer:  The result has been that my sons immediately distance themselves from me in order to avoid carrying out such directives.

6.  So, the FBI has completely deconstructed your family.

Answer:  Oh, yes.

7.  And how does the FBI's central involvement in trafficking in the United States relate?

Answer:  The FBI's trafficking of my children and MX is simply utilized as a powerful method of coercion toward them -- coercion of knowingly false witness statements, coercion of harm, coercion of silence.

8.  Isn't the FBI currently directing both of your sons to cause harm in a manner that could lead to the loss of their lives?

Answer:  I have reason to believe this is occurring, yes.

9.  Why is the agency doing so?

Answer:  The agency appears to be demanding a payoff from funds awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.  And this appears to be an ongoing process that has nothing to do with me whatsoever.  The FBI appears to be filing false claims toward me of criminal activity or mental imbalance and then directing various individuals in Washington, D.C. to file claims for funds against accounts in my name.  After that, the FBI siphons off the funds from the claimants.

10.  And where do the funds go after that?

Answer:  My impression is that they are primarily directed into the hands of organized crime within the United States, along with key figures within the FBI, the CIA, the DoD, and the political sphere.

11.  So, others are effectively feeding off of the torture of your family for their own profit and benefit.  And the FBI's central involvement in trafficking within the United States has enabled the coercion of your sons and MX through that particular form of enslavement.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct, yes.

12.  Have your sons been able to tell the truth about what has happened to them?

Answer:  I believe that OIG Hotline investigators have gleaned bits and pieces.  

13.  Not the whole ordeal?

Answer:  No, I don't think so.

14.  Why do you believe that disclosures to the OIG Hotline are incomplete?

Answer:  Because my sons' lives are currently under threat, as is MX's.  So, the agencies still believe they are effectively hiding the worst of their crimes against my family.  And at the same time, they are directing my sons to harm others, attempting to cast them in the worst possible light.

15.  Are those FBI directives being extended in an effort to deflect blame away from the FBI itself?

Answer:  There can be no doubt about this.  America as a whole does not know that the FBI is trafficking the nation's youth.  And the FBI is keenly motivated to prevent those broad disclosures from occurring.

16.  You have said that your sons' and MX's fundamental sovereignty has been violated.  Can you elaborate further on this subject?

Answer:  I regret that I cannot do so on this forum.  The means of the FBI's sovereignty violations of the honorable public do not constitute public information.  However, I can say that my sons and MX are not able to protect themselves through the exercise of their own free will at this time.

17.  Does the FBI exercise complete control over them?

Answer:  This seems to be the case, yes.  They are being puppeteered at this time.  And they have no ability to cut the strings the FBI is using to animate and control them.

18.  What is required in this case?

Answer:  We need intervention from President Trump, Vice President Vance, the U.S. Congress, the DOJ and the Supreme Court.  Without it, my children's lives are over, but so is the future of America's youth.  The government will never have a clearer opportunity to expose the FBI's participation in the trafficking of our most vulnerable and important generation.  If my children are sacrificed at this juncture, so is our shared future.

19.  Why do you believe that?

Answer:  No nation can preserve a worthy future when its premier federal law enforcement agency is trafficking its youth for profit.  It's simply not possible.

20.  What would your children need in order to feel safe in testifying about this issue?

Answer:  Removal of all communications devices from the FBI and its affiliates would be the first order of the day.  Until that is accomplished, those preying upon my children are still being given 24/7 access to them.  After that, they need to recover their sovereignty, their boundaries, and their safety.  Then, they might be able to express what the FBI has done to them.

21.  How long would that process take?

Answer:  The most important aspects of recovery could begin right away as long as the government demonstrated seriousness and consistency in the intent to preserve their lives and restore our family.  They are not likely to engage in full disclosure until they see some signs that others are committed to an entirely different course regarding human trafficking by the FBI and a significant portion of the agency's other crimes.

22.  Why not all?

Answer:  Not all of the FBI's crimes can be publicly revealed.  But some of them can.  And the sovereignty of Americans now and in the future depends upon our determination to do so.

23. Your point has been that the human trafficking crimes of the FBI have nothing whatsoever to do with the agency's mission and objectives.

Answer:  That's entirely correct.  They don't relate to mission and objectives at all.  And the cost to our nation, both now and in the future, is inestimably high.

24.  The FBI is engaging in human trafficking crimes against the American public for profit and coercion, not for some larger purpose.

Answer:  That is the lamentable fact of the matter, yes.

25.  What if we fail now to illuminate that fact?

Answer:  Then our freedoms are forfeit.

26.  Why?

Answer:  Because the FBI's coercion of the public through human trafficking and other crimes will simply spread and advance over time.  And in the future, due to the technologies the FBI is wielding, sovereignty will not be guaranteed to anyone.  So, barring decisive action now, the public will be functionally enslaved.

And I think it's important to understand that when I say the public, I am including the political sphere, the military sphere, and the law enforcement sphere.  Anyone who seeks to engage in self-determination will be targeted for trafficking or have to watch their children be raped and trafficked, as I have.

So, without intervention at this juncture, we will lose human sovereignty, and together with it, national sovereignty.

27.  How are human sovereignty and national sovereignty related?

Answer:  If individual Americans' free will can be violated and co-opted and controlled, then so can America itself.  This is clear.

28.  You would like to see determined and cohesive intervention to halt the FBI's human trafficking of America's youth, your own children among them.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  It is fair to say, yes.  It's more accurate to say that I exhort our leaders to act without delay on behalf of my family, and on behalf of the nation as a whole.

29.  Where does our freedom come from as a nation?

Answer:  It comes from our deep concern for one another.  We can only be free if our children are free, if our neighbors are free, and if our communities are free.

No individual is free when federal law enforcement in the form of the FBI is perpetrating human trafficking against our youth.

30.  Can this be appropriately exposed at this crossroads for our nation?

Answer:  This is the urgent question we're facing, and I ask that our leaders answer with a resounding, immediate, and heartfelt "yes."

31.  Thank you for speaking to these critical issues this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

The Safety and Security of My Sons in the Face of Directives to Harm Our Family

A Request for Intervention from President Trump and Others

 

Those I'm Rooting For

1.  You need restorative medical care for your pets and your family members, both, due to recent crimes perpetrated against your family by the FBI.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  Would you like to discuss the nature of those crimes?

Answer:  My older son was raped and trafficked on Saturday, March 8, and my younger son is now being given an assignment to assassinate someone.  Beyond this, my older son is being given "cleaning" assignments.  So, this is a set of horrific developments in the absence of any and all other considerations.

3.  Why is there such an emphasis on rape and trafficking within the FBI?

Answer:  Honestly, there's a tremendous institutionalized set of sexual aggressions that are part of the U.S. military.  The FBI is just an extension of that, and the agency is profiting from those atrocities.  A huge percentage of enlisted personnel in the U.S. armed forces is raped at least once.

4.  Why?

Answer:  Because this is being used as a method of torture and coercion.  It has become a routinized way of gaining compliance and destroying individual sovereignty within the United States military.  And there have been task forces assigned to characterize this problem. So its extent is well-known.

The fact that the FBI has been profiteering from the organized trafficking of America's youth is less recognized, but more devastating.

5.  Why is it more devastating?

Answer:  Because the FBI has so much leeway at this time.  No one is reining it in to the extent required.  The FBI and its affiliate agencies have been preying upon America's youth through social media, working hand in glove with organized crime.  And any time the FBI extends a communications device to a young person, this is a virtual guarantee of rape and trafficking.

6.  Why is that the case?

Answer:  If you grant human traffickers 24/7 access to concealed communications with our sons and daughters in the name of "national security," the rape and trafficking are a foregone conclusion.  These crimes have been perpetrated so fiercely by the agencies, and the so-called "profits" are so extreme.  So, there's a practiced predation and a viciousness surrounding this trap.  And young people have no way out.

7.  Can't their parents help them?

Answer:  Do you know how many times and how many ways I have asked for help in forcing the FBI to stop trafficking my sons?

8.  And the FBI and its affiliates have not stopped trafficking them?  Have not stopped assigning assassinations?  Have not stopped assigning "cleaning"?

Answer:  They have not.

9.  Does President Trump know about the crimes that are now being perpetrated against your family, during his term in Office?

Answer:  This is an important question to ask, and I'm glad you're asking it.

10.  What is the answer?

Answer:  I do not believe that President Trump supports the rape and trafficking of my children and I do not believe that he supports the rape and trafficking of America's children as a whole.

11.  So, you're describing an FBI that is out of the control of anyone.

Answer:  Well, the FBI's lawlessness has been known for quite some time.  I think President Trump and FBI Director Kash Patel are attempting to change that equation.

12.  Can it be done?

Answer:  Those who are trafficking my children, and America's children as a whole, should be fired as soon as possible, in my opinion.  And after that, there should be an extensive inquiry about how and why the agency went wrong regarding this area. 

13.  How will the American public feel about an FBI which has profited from the trafficking of America's children, after their personnel have vowed to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic?

Answer:  I can tell you exactly how they'll feel, because it's how I feel.  They will feel devastated, as I have felt devastated.  They will feel outraged, as I have felt outraged.  They will feel indignant, as I have felt indignant.  They will feel infuriated, as I have felt infuriated.  And they will feel determined, as I feel determined. 

And as part of all that, we need to ask our elected and appointed officials to insist that this appalling abuse of authority by the FBI and its affiliates changes right away.

14.  You mentioned that the FBI appeared to threaten having rendered your animals ill with a zoonotic illness that affects the heart.  Is that the case?

Answer:  This was the statement of the FBI, so this could be heartworm or something more sophisticated.  Then again, they could assail the health of my puppies in a thousand different ways.  

15.  Can the puppies' health be restored, along with your family members' health and your own?

Answer:  This is certainly within the FBI's capability, so I hope others will insist on our restoration right away.

16.  Have you received FOIA reports or investigative reports as of this time, 5:51 on Tuesday, March 11, 2025?

Answer:  Not as of this time.  No, I have not yet received FOIA reports or investigative reports.

17.  Will you receive them?  Has anyone communicated to you that there is a commitment to provide them to you?

Answer:  I have received no communication that there is a timeline to provide them or a promise to provide them as of yet.  I do believe the Supreme Court would be inclined for me to have them, and if this is the case, I am most grateful to the Honorable Justices for that determination.

18.  A man dropped an Amazon package at your door yesterday, but somehow the Ring video only showed him walking away, not walking toward your door.  Was that Ring video edited by others?

Answer:  Yes, it most certainly appeared to be.

19.  May I ask the intent of his presence on your property?

Answer:  In the photo in which he is walking away, he appears to be wearing a bullet proof vest.  With his cap to complete the picture, he looks like Special Forces personnel sent to my property to file a false witness statement.

20.  And you had a white truck stationed directly outside of your property all day today, didn't you?

Answer:  Yes, I did.

21.  Did you feel that might have been related to the appearance of Special Forces personnel at your door?

Answer:  Clearly, yes.

22.  What lie could he have told?

Answer:  In the past the FBI has suggested ridiculous things like kidnappings, hostages, and serial killings.  The only way the agency could coerce that type of false witness statement at this stage would be from military personnel or contractors.  So, that's how bad the situation has become.

23.  Can you show us the photograph of this so-called Amazon driver walking away from your front door?

Answer:  Absolutely.  Here it is.  

24.  And what is the package he left, please?

Answer:  This one:

25.  And could this "Amazon driver" possibly have seen anything illegal on your property?  A sign of a kidnapping?  Illegal drugs or weapons?  Signs of violence or serial killing?

Answer:  I've been outside today.  I cannot see any signs of any of the horrific events you describe whatsoever.  The house looks normal.  The driveway looks normal.  So any such assertions are completely and entirely fabricated, and I just feel stunned that, after everything I have communicated to the D.A.'s and the local police department, this kind of abuse is still being perpetrated.

26.  Is this actually about certain individuals wanting to appropriate the 8.3 trillion dollars allegedly awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI?  Perhaps individuals within the DoD?

Answer:  That explanation seems all too likely, I'm sorry to say.

27.  Is there any intention to communicate with you fairly and honorably?  Any intention at all?

Answer:  I believe President Trump, Vice President Vance, the Congress, the DOJ, and the Supreme Court desire to communicate with me fairly and openly, yes.

28.  Can they prevail over and above a corrupt FBI and its wayward affiliates?

Answer:  I think there's a possibility.  I'm rooting for them, and I hope they're rooting for my family and me at the same time.

29.  You are currently receiving renewed threats that the Hotshots and the Woodside Fire Protection District could set fire to your property in Portola Valley, CA and that the Falmouth Fire Department could set fire to your property in Woods Hole, MA.  What are your thoughts about this?

Answer:  Outreach from an honorable government representative -- someone agreed upon by the White House, the Congress, and the DOJ -- will clearly be protective against such crimes.

30.  Will you please continue to let us know about the wellbeing of your family members, including your pets, in the coming days?

Answer:  Of course, yes.  This is the only way I have of keeping the spotlight on this highly challenging circumstance, and ensuring that my family has even the slightest amount of safety.

31.  The FBI has appeared to lie about the intent of upcoming trips your husband plans to make.  What do you feel are the odds of his being able to travel without egregious harm?

Answer:  This is unknowable, so I will not be making that assessment.

32.  Please recover your health, and remain safe and secure.

Answer:  Thank you for those kind wishes.

Lane MacWilliams