1. Your older son Graham MacWilliams has allegedly contracted deer prion disease due to malfeasance by the FBI, utilizing a vector you would prefer not to disclose here. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
2. Deer prion disease is very much like BSE in that it leads to a horrible death with insanity along the way. Normally, it's not a risk for anyone who is not eating diseased venison.
Answer: This is all accurate, yes.
3. And what is the conveyance of this horrible illness meant to compel your older son to do?
Answer: Well, I would be quick to point out that this is not the only cause of my older son's loss of sovereignty, by any means. There have also been other horrific violations of his sovereignty and his free will through means that have had an even greater impact on his decision-making.
But in answer to your question, without sovereignty, a victim of the FBI can be compelled to do anything. Their free will has been stolen from them. Their fundamental personhood has been violated. Their personality, their ethics, and their moral frame of reference has been destroyed. So, there are no limits in these cases. And both of my sons, Graham MacWilliams and Duncan MacWillians, as well as MX, have been egregiously harmed in this manner.
4. What wrong has the FBI specifically instructed your older son to commit relating to the agency's conveyance of deer prion disease to him?
Answer: The FBI has directed him to cause direct harm to me, according to the FBI's own allegations.
5. Through violence?
Answer: Yes, this is what the FBI appears to allege. The agency seems to say that he has been provided with a weapon of some kind within his backpack and that he is meant to utilize it when he is in the house alone with me at some point.
6. Is this supposed to be a firearm?
Answer: I don't have that information. My older son has been forced to learn to shoot a firearm as well as to wield a knife and other weapons by an FBI-affiliate agency that forcibly conscripted him into a program he was not qualified to consent to.
Recently, the FBI has expressed that it intends to invalidate his Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney documentation, which explain that any concealed document prepared by the FBI and its affiliates are invalid due to his disability.
7. The FBI would like to invalidate your son's POA documentation immediately prior to taking his life?
Answer: Presumably. The FBI appears to be trying to set up an "event cascade," in which they could compel my son to invalidate his POA documents, extract false witness statements from him concerning his childhood and our family, direct him to cause physical harm to me, and take his life in an alleged law enforcement response to my harm.
This strikes the FBI as "neatness" and a "job well done," mainly because every event in the cascade appears to exonerate the agency and its affiliates while condemning the FBI's victims.
8. Do your son's POA documents remain valid as of this moment?
Answer: I don't have that information, but I believe the FBI has been actively attempting to invalidate them. So, their safety is in doubt.
9. How recently do you feel your life has been placed at risk by this circumstance?
Answer: Yesterday.
10. Yesterday in your home?
Answer: Yes.
11. Your son's handler directed him to cause harm to you yesterday in your home?
Answer: The directive was apparently given for him to act if given an opportunity.
12. You were able to perceive the risk of violence?
Answer: Oh, yes. That potential was highly palpable.
13. How, may I ask?
Answer: During normal conversation, my son became completely silent, stopped responding altogether, and became oriented toward an internal focus, presumably of active directives. The expression that overtook his face was absolutely horrible, utterly unlike him. He was barely recognizable facially, in the sense that he was no longer animated by his own personality, values, or principles. And the possibility of violence hung in the air like a latent potential -- like a gathering storm -- like the electrical charge gathers before lightning.
14. Were you frightened of your own son?
Answer: Honestly, it wasn't him in that moment. He had been separated from himself by a corrupt FBI and corrupt FBI affiliates. Was I frightened of the murderous intent of the FBI facing me in my own family room? It's fair to say that the situation was alarming.
15. Is there any way to put your family back together after the horrific crimes of the FBI toward you?
Answer: I would hasten to state that the FBI has co-opted other agencies and other criminal actors in its harm of my family.
Is there a way to rescue the sovereignty of all individual members of my family? Is there a way to speak the truth to one another about the crimes that have been committed against us? Is there a way to restore our deep bonds? Is there a way to reclaim our physical and cognitive health?
I wouldn't be here if I did not believe that were possible.
16. Have you received FOIA or investigative reports at this time?
Answer: I have not.
17. Will you?
Answer: I believe President Trump made the decision to provide them to me in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling, so I certainly hope so.
18. Has the FBI removed the reports from the mail once more?
Answer: It would appear so.
19. What is the answer?
Answer: I traveled all the way to Washington, DC to facilitate courier delivery. So, there are answers here.
20. There was a suggestion yesterday that your neighbors Ron and Rhonda Hyver were directed to install yet another harmful device placing your husband and you yourself at direct risk. Do you have reason to believe this might be true?
Answer: I do.
21. Any thoughts?
Answer: Clearly, that device should not be deployed, nor should any other harm against us.
22. You're also facing extensive kidnapping threats from the FBI, mostly pertaining to you, but also threatening other family members.
Answer: That's true.
23. Is that exclusively about ransom?
Answer: No, I think it's about ransom to the FBI and first-degree murder by the FBI, both.
24. Is your stalker proposing a marriage that is intended to result in your murder?
Answer: Apparently so. It seems like half the films and book that are being recommended to me online have titles such as "Death on a Honeymoon," and "Murder of the Bride." Certain types of sadists actually seek consent from their victims, it should be explained. So, this is what I seem to be dealing with, unfortunately.
25. What is your response to that suggestion?
Answer: I have had better proposals.
I prefer life, healing, character, integrity. courage, virtue and genuine bonds.
26. You do not consent to your own harm nor to the harm of your family members.
Answer: Not now, not ever.
27. Do you believe that there is a potential for a contribution to the longterm freedom of mankind if you are provided with reports that do not demonstrate redactions and omissions?
Answer: Yes, I believe that's possible.
28. Are there others who desire to support that sovereignty?
Answer: We all need to hope and pray that there are.
29. Does an appeal need to be filed immediately to ensure that your life and the lives of your loved ones are no longer under threat?
Answer: I believe it does, yes.
30. Do you ask for that appeal to be pursued most rigorously?
Answer: Yes, I do.
31. Will you please let us know whether you receive the reports the Supreme Court and President Trump have intended that you should have?
Answer: Yes, I will.
32. Will you please let us know how you and your family members are faring under these astonishing circumstances?
Answer: Absolutely.
33. Before closing, you adopted two puppies recently. How has that been proceeding?
Answer: We need a puppy trainer, which the FBI is preventing us from obtaining. But in general, the puppies are concerned with love, not money, and so it's a solace to spend time with little beings who know what's important.
Their joy is not dependent upon their Bitcoin account, and that's a colossal relief.
34. How many people has your stalker paid off in order to attempt to continue to cause your family appalling harm?
Answer: How many people has he not paid off? This is a shorter and more manageable list.
35. Is the nation's longterm sovereignty important enough to now treat you honorably, fairly and respectfully regarding this matter?
Answer: That's what we're about to find out.
36. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment