OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to suggest that attorneys are fighting for my life this morning in the face of FBI allegations that I have violated the agency's confidentiality regarding both its trafficking of America's youth for profit, and its willful violations of human sovereignty in the same population.
But the FBI has never communicated to me one word about its confidentiality requirements, despite my repeated requests that it do so, and despite the Supreme Court's own ruling that FOIA reports and investigative reports are due to me in their entirety.
Instead, the FBI has simply raped and trafficked my loved ones.
While I was in Washington, D.C. last week, making myself available to your Office for both courier delivery and direct communication with your investigators regarding the FBI's crimes against my family, the FBI was perpetrating the rape and trafficking of my oldest son.
I don't think that represents good faith engagement or lawful professionalism in any way, shape or form. And I don't think the American people do either.
Some time ago, I wrote to the Supreme Court to explain that there are now two visions of humanity's future civilization, and that we ourselves are asked to choose between these divergent scenarios of human potential.
One prefigures human enslavement, the loss of all meaningful human sovereignty, the usurpation of free will on a permanent and irreversible basis.
And the other envisions the preservation of meaningful freedom.
To place this in context, I republish below my writing on President Trump's capacity to rescue the freedom of mankind for our nation and for humanity as a whole, written on the eve of his inauguration:
Our Greatest Human Potential: Reflections on the Eve of the Inauguration
1. What kind of threats is your younger son experiencing at this time, please?
Answer: There is a reprise of previous threats, certainly. But I believe that he is currently being safeguarded by those who wish to see him recover, together with my other family members.
2. President Trump's inauguration is tomorrow. What is your feeling about this all-important changing-of-the-guard?
Answer: As I mentioned yesterday, I am extremely hopeful that it will signal a critical and timely shift in responsiveness to this issue, together with much needed improvement in my family's fundamental safety and well-being.
3. What are the opportunities for President Trump in addressing this issue?
Answer: They are historic. President Trump's determinations pertaining to the fundamental sovereignty of American citizens will have repercussions for all of human civilization for the foreseeable future.
4. Is that hyperbole in any regard?
Answer: No. Decidedly not. The choices President Trump will make pertaining to the right of the individual to make his or her own decisions will determine the future potential of human society as a whole. That's not an exaggeration. That's where we currently stand. All of our greatest potential hinges on the question of whether we can defend human sovereignty from being usurped at this time.
5. If we cannot defend critical aspects of our self-determination, what will happen?
Answer: If we lose our right to individual sovereignty, we will see the majority of society, over time, become functionally enslaved. The public will have one opinion, with no dissent -- one view of history, one view of education, one view of economics, one view of family life, one view of art, one view of other nations. There simply will not be complexity or depth of analysis, opinions, challenges or achievements. Instead we will express the approved thoughts of others -- and that is all.
6. What would that mean for the human race as a species?
Answer: It would mean -- should such a tragedy come to pass -- a great diminishment of human civilization. Our most magnificent epiphanies, inventions, discoveries, artistic creations, insights, spirituality and transformational human bonds would be lost to us. We simply would not be capable of the depth of feeling, thought, or originality required.
7. What if President Trump can rescue human sovereignty at this inflection point?
Answer: Well, as I said, this would be historic. It's difficult to think of a greater contribution to mankind, frankly. It would dwarf President Lincoln's emancipation of the slaves in its impact by thousands of times. There is no precedent.
8. Do you believe that President Trump has the determination to take such a stand?
Answer: I do. I believe in his courage. I believe in his willingness to insist on the freedom of mankind. I believe that he has both the insight and the force of will to change the course of human history for the better.
9. In the face of these immense challenges to our freedoms, what will be the fate of falsified law enforcement reporting? What will be the fate of the Constitution?
Answer: It may take a little time to alter the current expansion of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. But I hope that President Trump will decide to reject the undermining of society that its long term presence would manifest. Every human interaction is predicated on an assumption of trust. If I buy an apple at the grocery store, I am trusting that the grocer will not lie about me afterwards by saying that I bought a suspicious apple, or a poisoned apple, or a forbidden apple. So even the smallest human interactions are diminished by knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting. Ultimately, such lies destroy our worthiness within families, communities, neighborhoods, and the nation as a whole. So, they cannot be allowed to predominate if we want to be a substantive and worthy country.
10. And the Constitution itself?
Answer: While our Constitution is hugely valuable in balancing the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of our government, it does not envision the problem that is presented by the intelligence agencies, which, with total aggregation of information about the law-abiding American public, have begun to function in the capacity of organized crime toward the other three branches of government and toward the American public itself. So we have a profound imbalance of power that has resulted.
The national security apparatus has begun to act in a predatory capacity toward the legitimate powers of U.S. government, and there are concerns that it is involved in human trafficking, drug trafficking, extortion, bribery and violence against the healthy elements of society. So, we have a tremendous problem within the counterintelligence divisions of the FBI and the CIA, and one that is rapidly expanding due to the harnessing of AI as a producer and aggregator of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting about all Americans.
So our Constitution needs substantive work to catch up to our current structural problems and to solve them.
It would be wonderful if the current Congress could begin to address changes to the Constitution so that it appropriately prevents the vast encroachments on our freedoms that we are currently experiencing.
11. Does the Freedom of Information Act need to be strengthened?
Answer: It does in my view, and, again, President Trump may have an opinion about the Freedom of Information Act becoming a Constitutional Amendment. In and of itself, this would represent a tremendous achievement in ensuring that we do not slip into a dystopia controlled by the unelected.
12. You have said that you will be watching President Trump's inauguration tomorrow with great expectation and enthusiasm.
Answer: Yes, I will. Our freedoms are being given a chance at a critical inflection point in human history due to the election of President Trump. And I hope that Americans as a whole come to appreciate how critical his leadership will be for us and for the future freedoms of mankind.
13. Would you hope to continue to illuminate what is at stake for us at this moment in history?
Answer: Again, it is important to ensure that certain confidentiality requirements on the government's part are being upheld. But within that framework, yes, of course, I want people to know how crucial President Trump is to the most meaningful and worthy realization of our nation's future.
Nelson Mandela wrote that "to be free is not merely to cast off one's chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others."
President Trump may be the leader who ensures that mankind can claim the dignity, the honor, and the worthiness of human sovereignty in perpetuity.
That would represent an unprecedented legacy, transcendent of all other Presidential contributions, in my opinion.
14. Thank you for your insights this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
Let's take the opportunity now to stand for a future, and its related present, which is worthy of our nation, worthy of our neighbors, worthy of our families, and worthy of ourselves.
Human sovereignty is not an "add on" to civilization that can be alternately abandoned or tacked on at will.
Freedom is, rather, foundational to the manner in which we pursue family health, education at every level, professional attainment, scientific discovery, artistic creation, spiritual epiphany, emotional maturity, the accrual of wisdom and the pursuit of peace.
So, I hope the Supreme Court will recognize freedom's requirements as paramount to our nation as it was founded, and necessary to our nation as it is envisioned in the future.
If the FBI has secrecy needs, it should express them to me through an attorney, as I have asked, not through advocating the agenda of first-degree murder it has pursued against my family from the outset.
Without this accountability, Americans will have already fallen into an irretrievable enslavement. The only difference between now and 1850 is that most of them don't know.
Please stand with me in extending a sharp rebuke to the FBI, whose only answer to my respectful questions has to date been silence, aggression, defamation, and law-breaking.
Our nation deserves better. So does my family. And so do I.
Most sincerely,
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment