1. Has Congress been informed that the FBI was, in fact, paying child predator Larry Nassar to conduct "background checks" of the USA gymnasts as he was facilitating the agency's filming of his child abuse?
Answer: I believe it has.
2. And what is Congress' response to this outrage, please?
Answer: I have no information about Congress' response, but I can say that the only possible response of a human being to this information is shock, dismay, and horror.
3. In light of this revelation, have the President and Congress insisted that you be provided with FOIA reports and investigative reports pertaining to your case?
Answer: I would expect that they have done so, yes.
4. And have you received those reports as of this time?
Answer: I have not.
5. Has the FBI once again appeared to remove them from the U.S. Postal Service?
Answer: This would appear to be the case.
6. Was the agency claiming all the while that you had received them?
Answer: Lies along this line would be completely consistent with the continuous deceit and prevarication coming from this agency.
7. Is the FBI continuing to produce knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting regarding your sons?
Answer: I must assume that the FBI's assertions that it is directing one or both of my sons to accept or transfer items that could be misinterpreted as contraband for terrorists is based on the agency's total control over my sons' conduct. If the FBI directs them to move a box from person A to person B, they are going to comply at this point.
8. Have your sons lost their sovereignty to the FBI?
Answer: Oh, yes.
9. So their ability to tell the FBI "No, I am not going to comply with your directive in this case" is ...
Answer: Non-existent.
10. Is the FBI attempting to turn your sons into terrorists before the reports can reach you? Is this the agency's idea of thoroughly discrediting your family?
Answer: The FBI could direct my sons and MX to do anything at this point, and that conduct would be a total, uncontested reflection of the FBI itself. That's what the loss of sovereignty entails -- the rendering of previously independent citizens into functional wards of the state, automatons who are completely dependent on directives and permission for the smallest acts.
Do you want a sip of water? Your handler is going to need to approve it.
This is the control the FBI is exerting over my sons and MX at this time.
11. If our government is currently unable to stand up to the FBI's criminal harm, having nothing whatsoever to do with its mission and objectives, what are the odds that that ability will emerge in the future?
Answer: They're zero. The FBI is not suddenly going to grow a conscience and stop terrorizing the American public in a manner that is separate and apart from the agency's mission and objectives. And it is not going to halt its improper deployments of harm in seeking to control the public in gratuitous ways. So, if our leaders cannot stand up to the agency now, that confrontation is not going to happen in any meaningful measure in the future.
12. How do you yourself feel about all of this?
Answer: Appalled. I want to hear our leaders stepping up forcefully and determinedly to say "No, it is not acceptable that the public is being victimized in gratuitous ways by this unethical agency."
13. What about the mission and objectives of the FBI that have been approved? Do the agency's gratuitous predations place its approved goals at risk?
Answer: I think you're asking whether the FBI can be replaced by an agency that will hold strictly to mission and objectives for as long as necessary and then immediately pivot to other priorities when instructed to do so.
And I think the answer is yes.
14. What do you make of the FBI's description of your sons as "marked men" because the agency is so frightened of the truth they might tell about having been raped, trafficked and abused at agency directives?
Answer: I don't think my sons should be suffering from so much as a hangnail at this point. That's what I think of it. The FBI's ongoing threats to murder my sons and MX, and indeed my whole family, are duly noted. They do not do the agency credit.
15. And what about the agency's assertions that your younger son Duncan is being forced to provide egregiously falsified witness statements about your whole family?
Answer: This is nothing new. My sons have been subjected to torture by the FBI. Their witness statements prepared at the directive of agency personnel and affiliates no longer hold any value as a direct result.
16. Is the agency still falsely accusing you and other family members of "espionage"?
Answer: I haven't ever seen the agency admit its lies, so I have to assume these FBI deceits are ongoing.
17. How are you supposed to be profiting from these non-existent crimes?
Answer: I have no idea. Has the agency opened up bank accounts in my name and placed money within them? I honestly don't know. What I can say is that I have not profited in any way from FBI schemes or unlawful acts. In truth, I have been deprived of income and savings by the predations of the FBI at every turn.
18. Are FBI threats of kidnapping you or your family members wrongfully justified on the basis of the FBI's lies about terrorism or espionage of which you have no knowledge?
Answer: I think they're based on sheer avarice. The agency simply wants a big payday and is willing to commit gratuitous kidnapping and first-degree murder to get it.
What is the false justification for such indefensible crimes? I have no idea, and it hardly matters.
19. Have you had indications that those kidnapping threats are serious?
Answer: I have. And I think it's likely that the sniping threats, staged car accident threats, threats of drone assault meant to mimic natural disaster and bomb threats against my family are serious as well.
20. To be clear, you have never consented to harm of any kind perpetrated against your family members, your friends, your acquaintances, your pets, your properties or yourself.
Answer: To be clear, I have not and I will not.
21. Will you please keep us apprised of your family members' health and wellbeing, including that of your pets?
Answer: Of course I will.
22. Thank you for sharing your insights this morning.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment