Crimes Against Human Sovereignty By the FBI

1.  What is it like to have your older son unlawfully tasked with "cleaning" assignments or worse by his corrupt handler within the CIA?

Answer:  To be clear, the CIA is acting as an FBI contractor in this case, because the CIA only forcibly recruited my older son at FBI initiative.

But in answer to your question, the experience is horrific and stands in direct repudiation of all human decency and societal virtue.

2.  Your son has a disability which, through your Power of Attorney and Medical Power of Attorney, has invalidated his prior agreements with the CIA.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

3.  Even so, his handler continues to unlawfully task him by threatening his life.  Isn't that so?

Answer:  Yes.

4.  And the threats to his life are not empty.  Rather they have involved the CIA's communication to your son of deadly disease, which his handler refused to treat unless your son follows his handler's directives.  Isn't that accurate?

Answer:  It is accurate.

5.  What wrongful acts did your son's handler direct him to perpetrate last night?

Answer:  I honestly don't know.  This could have constituted a "cleaning" assignment, though the FBI alleges that he was forced to perpetrate harm of some kind.

6.  What is a "cleaning assignment"?

Answer:  It is the forced desecration of a human corpse through dismemberment following a first-degree murder committed by the FBI or its affiliates.  And I'm sure it involves an attempt to erase evidence that a violent crime has been committed.

7.  When your son's handler has forced him to perpetrate harm in the past, what has that harm consisted of?  Torture?  Rape?  Murder?

Answer:  I don't know.  What I can say is that my son has lost his sovereignty as a direct result of the FBI's crimes against him and against our family. So his handler could direct him to do anything and he would be unable to refuse.

8.  What methods are utilized in stealing the sovereignty of an American citizen?

Answer:  In my older son's case, torture, rape, trafficking, and the conveyance of deadly disease have all been utilized, in addition to numerous other "methods" routinely used by the FBI as mechanisms of control over targeted members of the American public.

9.  You have recently disclosed that the FBI is heavily involved in the trafficking of American citizens.  Is the agency attempting to discredit your family as a result?  Is this why your son was given a wrongful directive by his handler last night?

Answer:  Honestly, it seems to be about discrediting my family, yes.  But I think the larger objective is to attempt to extract false witness statements from my older son that would allow a wrongful law enforcement raid on our home.

10.  With a violent intent?

Answer:  Yes, with a violent intent.

11.  And is the plan oriented toward the misappropriation of funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI?

Answer:  It appears to be, yes.

12.  So, really, this is about greed.  Avarice.

Answer:  I believe that greed is the driving force behind these crimes against my family -- this insatiable hunger for money.

13.  Who is participating in these crimes against your family as perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates at this time?

Answer:  This is an important question, certainly.  Who knows about them?  Who is authorizing them?  Who is seeking to profit from them?

14.  The FBI has routinely threatened, having stolen your son's sovereignty, to direct him to commit public harm toward innocents, has it not?

Answer:  Yes, it has.

15.  Do you think the FBI, through its experiments with sovereignty violations, is responsible for a certain percentage of mass shootings in the public sphere?

Answer:  This is occurring, without doubt.  The question is to what degree.  Is the FBI responsible for fifty percent of mass shootings in the United States?  Eighty percent?  Ninety?  There is direct culpability for the agency in a majority of these crimes.

Again, I am not disclosing here the full range of methods the FBI is utilizing in sovereignty violations.  But the tools are extensive, and when I say sovereignty violations, I am really talking about a total usurpation of independent human will.

16.  A total overthrow of the individual's ability to make his or her own decisions?

Answer:  Complete.  Yes.  There are no vestiges left of the individual's capacity to reject wrongful directives from his handler.  

17.  What is it like to witness these violations perpetrated by the FBI against your own children?

Answer:  What is the scariest horror film you have ever seen?  Multiply it by one thousand.

18.  You have said that all of your efforts to invest your sons with an unshakeable ethical framework, guiding principles, and a moral reference frame to aid them in decision-making throughout life have been effectively erased by a predatory FBI in an astonishingly short period of time.

Answer:  The loss of sovereignty makes no exceptions for the children of those of us who were excellent, attentive and loving parents.  All of that human investment in raising wonderful young men and women is simply wiped out by these predatory and inhuman stratagems of sovereignty violation being deployed by the FBI.

19.  If this matter is not illuminated further, how do you evaluate the future freedoms of Americans as a whole?

Answer:  They are utterly forfeit.

If this nation cannot muster the will to care about my children, it will care about no one's children.

The FBI's sovereignty violations make a mockery of the Constitution, and the agency knows it well.

So without proper accountability in this case, there can be no future freedoms, and we cannot expect we will have another chance to rescue them.

20.  Why not?

Answer:  There's already a tremendous knowledge gap between the public's awareness of tools being wielded by the FBI and the FBI's active deployment of those modalities, and this chasm is rapidly expanding.  There will not come a future time in which we can pause to consider the effects of the FBI's virtual enslavement and exploitation of the public through the co-opting of the human will.  That moment is now, not later.

21.  Should the communications devices of the FBI and its affiliates have been removed from your sons and MX the moment it was determined that sovereignty violations were occurring?

Answer:  That very instant, yes.

22.  And did you request this?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  I requested it endlessly.

23.  Yet those communications devices are still in place?

Answer:  Yes, they are.

24.  Is this a failure of the DOJ?  Is this a failure of a judicial process?  Why were those communications devices not removed?

Answer:  These are important questions, and their answers deserve our full attention as a nation.

25.  Can't your sons' handlers be stopped?  Can't the White House forcefully direct them to stop?

Answer:  Again, these are critical questions, and I'm glad you're giving voice to them.

26.  The FBI has also recently conveyed serious illness to you and to your pets.  It's not only your sons who are experiencing the terrible harms the agency is now wielding against you.

Answer:  That's true.

27.  Is this also because you revealed that the FBI is responsible for human trafficking crimes within the United States?

Answer:  I think the agency has been shamed by the human trafficking revelations, and I also think they have been shamed over their treasonous betrayals of American athletes on the world stage.

28.  Do you believe that the exacerbation of harm against your family has been the result of planning by both national and international participants?

Answer:  I do.  There is likely an intent to raid the coffers of the U.S. Treasury in a manner that transcends our borders.

29.  And you have still not been formally informed about funds awarded in your name?

Answer:  No, I have not.

30.  What needs to happen next?

Answer:  Leadership needs to happen next.  I will appreciate outreach on an immediate basis, along with a full investigation of the recent harms of my sons and MX.

31.  In the meantime, you are allowing the publication of your recent texts to your older son, below, in order to illuminate a portion of the impact of the FBI's crimes against your family.

Answer:  Yes, I am.  Keep in mind that I extend these exhortations to him even knowing he has lost his sovereignty.  It's like speaking a prayer to a person in a coma.  He cannot respond.  He cannot save himself.  But in the future, he may remember that I was advocating for him, and this may help him in some manner yet to be elucidated.

32.  You do not believe your words alone can overcome the FBI's sovereignty violations toward your sons and MX.

Answer:  Absolutely not.

33.  Can their sovereignty be returned to them?

Answer:  If we are a worthy nation, we will insist on finding out.

34.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Nowhere On Earth

 1.  Who would have sold out the USA gymnasts through paying Larry Nassar as an FBI informant running "background checks" while he was abusing those virtuous girls and young women who were representing our nation?

Answer:  Obviously, that initiative originated with an adversary of the United States, someone who felt that it was satisfying to harm those formally representing the United States at the highest level in athletic competition, and particularly in the realm of gymnastics.  I would expect that the originator of those acts represented a nation that competes with the U.S. internationally in women's gymnastics competitions -- a nation that believes that, were the USA gymnasts incapacitated, they might be dominant.

2.  You're talking about Russia or China.

Answer:  Russia and/or China would represent reasonably deduced answers here.  I think the American people deserve to know where these directives originated, who within the FBI was paid to advance them, and further, what other teams may be suffering from harm in various manifestations due to similarly competitive initiatives.

For example, it was documented that the U.S. men's swimming team during the Paris Olympics appeared to be intentionally undermined by an improper training schedule immediately before critical team competitions.

3.  The men on the U.S. swim team apparently felt betrayed by what transpired, I understand.

Answer:  Yes, they did.

So, we would want to know what happened there.  The FBI or FBI affiliates were likely pressuring the coaches with threats and bribes, and so we would want to illuminate these events and fully understand their origin.

4.  Who won the men's 4 x 100 relay in swimming at the Paris Olympics?

Answer:  China.

5.  Because the United States is is normally dominant in this event.

Answer:  Without question.

6.  Some of the Chinese swimmers had earlier tested positive for a banned substance that was ruled to be the result of unexplained contamination within a restaurant.

Answer:  This was reported, yes.

7.  What is going on here?

Answer:  The United States is experiencing fundamental problems with sovereignty due to the corruption of the FBI and FBI-affiliated agencies, and the world-class U.S. athletes who are some of the most visible and dominant representatives of U.S. competition on the global stage are paying a high price.  That's what's going on.

8.  How critical is it that the FBI's crimes against the American public in the realm of human trafficking be illuminated at this juncture?

Answer:  How critical is the future of the American people?  Those questions are one and the same.

9.  You feel righteous indignation over this issue.

Answer:  Every American is going to feel righteous indignation over this issue.  The human trafficking crimes of the FBI and its affiliates represent such a fundamental assault on our nation's families and communities -- and such a profound betrayal of everything the FBI is meant to stand for in defending the nation -- that righteous indignation is the least of the feelings the public is going to bring to this matter.

10.  Did the FBI offer to remodel your home on Cape Cod if you kept quiet about this?

Answer:  That appeared to be something the agency was suggesting, albeit indirectly.

11.  What is your response to that suggestion?

Answer:  Do I seem like the type of person who would sell out America's children in return for a remodeled house?

12.  No, you don't.

Answer:  Thank you very much.

13.  What needs to happen regarding this matter?

Answer:  We need to understand who is paying off the FBI to undermine the nation, and we need to comprehend whether those payments are also being directed to key figures within the United States' military and within other spheres as well.

14.  What will happen if we don't?

Answer:  Adversarial nations will continue to cause the American public appalling harms in the realm of human trafficking and other realms having nothing whatsoever to do with our nation's goals, and the FBI will continue to help them.

15.  Has the FBI acted in treasonous ways toward the American public pertaining to human trafficking?

Answer:  I believe the FBI has done so, yes.  And I also suspect that FBI affiliates have acted in treasonous ways when in comes to drug trafficking that has harmed countless American citizens.

Again, neither human trafficking nor drug trafficking have anything whatsoever to do with the mission and objectives of the FBI or its affiliate agencies.  This is important to keep in mind.

16.  Human trafficking and drug trafficking do not meet any national objectives of the FBI, whether concealed or overt.   Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct.

However, these are highly lucrative "businesses" that are controlled by organized crime figures within the United States and elsewhere, and those funds are being funneled to certain key figures within the FBI and elsewhere, without doubt.

The American public can be disabled by human trafficking and drug trafficking crimes perpetrated by the FBI, with a portion of Americans losing their lives over these forms of enslavement.

And with a disabled public, the interests of our foreign adversaries are greatly advanced.

17.  You want outreach concerning these crimes against your family, and you want outreach concerning these crimes against our nation.  Is that true?

Answer:  Oh, yes.

18.  Isn't the FBI continuing to engage in knowingly falsified reporting against your family?

Answer:  I would say that the knowingly falsified reporting by the FBI has accelerated, not abated, over recent days.

19.  What are the reasons for this?

Answer:  Obviously, the FBI is attempting to avoid accountability with regard to its own predation toward the American public in the realm of human trafficking.  So, there is an exacerbation of falsified law enforcement information concerning my family and myself.

20.  Isn't it likely that the FBI was offering to remodel your house on Cape Cod only to claim that you accepted those improvements as a bribe from Russia or China for malfeasance of which you and and your husband know nothing whatsoever?

Answer:  This would be a typical pattern for the agency.  The FBI appears incapable of acknowledging its own guilt.  Instead, it projects all of its own crimes onto its victims.  This is an institutional culture, deeply ingrained, and it represents a terrible flaw within the organization and a pressing problem for the nation as a whole.

21.  Is the FBI, having betrayed the national interest through human trafficking crimes toward the American people, still worthy of the public trust?

Answer:  Let's ask the American public that question, and let's be certain they know all the facts as they decide upon their answer.

22.  You have said that the American public is a sleeping giant.

Answer:  The giant is not always asleep, and no one should be counting on the giant's indefinite slumber regarding this issue.

23.  You want outreach regarding your case on an immediate basis, and you want outreach regarding the human trafficking crimes against the American public as a whole.  Is that right?

Answer:  I don't know how many times I have to say this.  Yes.  Lawful and honorable outreach is necessary at this time.

24.  Is there a greater or more determined love than that you feel for America's children?

Answer:  Nowhere on earth.

25.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, March 24, 2025

OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including, but not limited to, those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

The FBI Lost This Case

OIG Hotline, there is an apparent suggestion by the FBI that awards extended in my name through your auspices and that of the ODNI may be argued by attorneys for the FBI itself to be unconstitutional, with the agency's intention of subsequently misappropriating already designated funds.

Clearly, what is unconstitutional is the FBI's theft of funds intended to address the FBI's flagrant abuse, misconduct, and predation in this case.

If the case itself were unconstitutional, the Supreme Court would have refused to hear it.

Yet the Highest Court has, according to the FBI, spent great time and effort on this matter, including rendering myriad judgements in my favor, not the least of which is reported to be an Order that FOIA reports and investigative reports be provided to me.

Concealment of this case has allowed the FBI altogether too much judicial leeway.

If the FBI chooses to make the argument that future judgements should be handled in a different manner, that argument may be considered.

But the agency should not be enabled to retroactively invalidate a legal process in which the agency has played an astonishingly active, if consistently dishonest, role.

The FBI lost this case.

That doesn't mean that the agency is now allowed to question its constitutionality with a view toward misappropriating judgements against it as perpetrator.

That means that the FBI lost.

How public that loss becomes is a matter for discussion, no doubt, but the fundamentals of the agency's violations of my rights and those of my family members cannot be in doubt.

Thank you for allowing me to express this concern.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications for the OIG Hotline, March 23, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please access communications sent to your attention within lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, as well as communications sent to your Office's email address from alternate gmails lanevonherzen@gmail.com and lanevonherzen1@gmail.com, including those listed below.

You are welcome to access all of my legitimate email accounts at any time.  Please note that gmail represents the only email provider I am currently utilizing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

OIG, Please Access Communications Sent to Your Attention Within Lanemacwilliams@gmail.com.

 

A Request for Our Leaders to Insist on America's Sovereignty

 1.  Are your sons' and MX's lives currently under threat pertaining to the trafficking crimes of the FBI and affiliated agencies toward them?

Answer:  Yes, they are.  And beside overt death threats, the FBI is threatening to coerce them into committing crimes against others.

2.  Do you know what crimes the FBI is threatening to coerce them into specifically?

Answer:  No.  But I know the agency is alleging it has engaged in false imprisonment of both of them already, only releasing them with their promise to comply with all agency directives.

3.  Both of your sons have been directed by the FBI and its affiliates to cause harm to members of your own family, haven't they?

Answer:  Yes, they have, monstrously enough.

4.  What are your thoughts about the FBI's actions in this case?

Answer:  This simply represents one of the worst possible manifestations of corrupt law enforcement imaginable.  We might see these sort of atrocities manifesting in North Korea or other totalitarian regimes.  It manifests the extremes of failing "national security" institutions in preying upon the honorable public.

5.  And what has been the result of these FBI directives?

Answer:  The result has been that my sons immediately distance themselves from me in order to avoid carrying out such directives.

6.  So, the FBI has completely deconstructed your family.

Answer:  Oh, yes.

7.  And how does the FBI's central involvement in trafficking in the United States relate?

Answer:  The FBI's trafficking of my children and MX is simply utilized as a powerful method of coercion toward them -- coercion of knowingly false witness statements, coercion of harm, coercion of silence.

8.  Isn't the FBI currently directing both of your sons to cause harm in a manner that could lead to the loss of their lives?

Answer:  I have reason to believe this is occurring, yes.

9.  Why is the agency doing so?

Answer:  The agency appears to be demanding a payoff from funds awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI.  And this appears to be an ongoing process that has nothing to do with me whatsoever.  The FBI appears to be filing false claims toward me of criminal activity or mental imbalance and then directing various individuals in Washington, D.C. to file claims for funds against accounts in my name.  After that, the FBI siphons off the funds from the claimants.

10.  And where do the funds go after that?

Answer:  My impression is that they are primarily directed into the hands of organized crime within the United States, along with key figures within the FBI, the CIA, the DoD, and the political sphere.

11.  So, others are effectively feeding off of the torture of your family for their own profit and benefit.  And the FBI's central involvement in trafficking within the United States has enabled the coercion of your sons and MX through that particular form of enslavement.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct, yes.

12.  Have your sons been able to tell the truth about what has happened to them?

Answer:  I believe that OIG Hotline investigators have gleaned bits and pieces.  

13.  Not the whole ordeal?

Answer:  No, I don't think so.

14.  Why do you believe that disclosures to the OIG Hotline are incomplete?

Answer:  Because my sons' lives are currently under threat, as is MX's.  So, the agencies still believe they are effectively hiding the worst of their crimes against my family.  And at the same time, they are directing my sons to harm others, attempting to cast them in the worst possible light.

15.  Are those FBI directives being extended in an effort to deflect blame away from the FBI itself?

Answer:  There can be no doubt about this.  America as a whole does not know that the FBI is trafficking the nation's youth.  And the FBI is keenly motivated to prevent those broad disclosures from occurring.

16.  You have said that your sons' and MX's fundamental sovereignty has been violated.  Can you elaborate further on this subject?

Answer:  I regret that I cannot do so on this forum.  The means of the FBI's sovereignty violations of the honorable public do not constitute public information.  However, I can say that my sons and MX are not able to protect themselves through the exercise of their own free will at this time.

17.  Does the FBI exercise complete control over them?

Answer:  This seems to be the case, yes.  They are being puppeteered at this time.  And they have no ability to cut the strings the FBI is using to animate and control them.

18.  What is required in this case?

Answer:  We need intervention from President Trump, Vice President Vance, the U.S. Congress, the DOJ and the Supreme Court.  Without it, my children's lives are over, but so is the future of America's youth.  The government will never have a clearer opportunity to expose the FBI's participation in the trafficking of our most vulnerable and important generation.  If my children are sacrificed at this juncture, so is our shared future.

19.  Why do you believe that?

Answer:  No nation can preserve a worthy future when its premier federal law enforcement agency is trafficking its youth for profit.  It's simply not possible.

20.  What would your children need in order to feel safe in testifying about this issue?

Answer:  Removal of all communications devices from the FBI and its affiliates would be the first order of the day.  Until that is accomplished, those preying upon my children are still being given 24/7 access to them.  After that, they need to recover their sovereignty, their boundaries, and their safety.  Then, they might be able to express what the FBI has done to them.

21.  How long would that process take?

Answer:  The most important aspects of recovery could begin right away as long as the government demonstrated seriousness and consistency in the intent to preserve their lives and restore our family.  They are not likely to engage in full disclosure until they see some signs that others are committed to an entirely different course regarding human trafficking by the FBI and a significant portion of the agency's other crimes.

22.  Why not all?

Answer:  Not all of the FBI's crimes can be publicly revealed.  But some of them can.  And the sovereignty of Americans now and in the future depends upon our determination to do so.

23. Your point has been that the human trafficking crimes of the FBI have nothing whatsoever to do with the agency's mission and objectives.

Answer:  That's entirely correct.  They don't relate to mission and objectives at all.  And the cost to our nation, both now and in the future, is inestimably high.

24.  The FBI is engaging in human trafficking crimes against the American public for profit and coercion, not for some larger purpose.

Answer:  That is the lamentable fact of the matter, yes.

25.  What if we fail now to illuminate that fact?

Answer:  Then our freedoms are forfeit.

26.  Why?

Answer:  Because the FBI's coercion of the public through human trafficking and other crimes will simply spread and advance over time.  And in the future, due to the technologies the FBI is wielding, sovereignty will not be guaranteed to anyone.  So, barring decisive action now, the public will be functionally enslaved.

And I think it's important to understand that when I say the public, I am including the political sphere, the military sphere, and the law enforcement sphere.  Anyone who seeks to engage in self-determination will be targeted for trafficking or have to watch their children be raped and trafficked, as I have.

So, without intervention at this juncture, we will lose human sovereignty, and together with it, national sovereignty.

27.  How are human sovereignty and national sovereignty related?

Answer:  If individual Americans' free will can be violated and co-opted and controlled, then so can America itself.  This is clear.

28.  You would like to see determined and cohesive intervention to halt the FBI's human trafficking of America's youth, your own children among them.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  It is fair to say, yes.  It's more accurate to say that I exhort our leaders to act without delay on behalf of my family, and on behalf of the nation as a whole.

29.  Where does our freedom come from as a nation?

Answer:  It comes from our deep concern for one another.  We can only be free if our children are free, if our neighbors are free, and if our communities are free.

No individual is free when federal law enforcement in the form of the FBI is perpetrating human trafficking against our youth.

30.  Can this be appropriately exposed at this crossroads for our nation?

Answer:  This is the urgent question we're facing, and I ask that our leaders answer with a resounding, immediate, and heartfelt "yes."

31.  Thank you for speaking to these critical issues this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

The Safety and Security of My Sons in the Face of Directives to Harm Our Family

A Request for Intervention from President Trump and Others

 

Those I'm Rooting For

1.  You need restorative medical care for your pets and your family members, both, due to recent crimes perpetrated against your family by the FBI.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  Would you like to discuss the nature of those crimes?

Answer:  My older son was raped and trafficked on Saturday, March 8, and my younger son is now being given an assignment to assassinate someone.  Beyond this, my older son is being given "cleaning" assignments.  So, this is a set of horrific developments in the absence of any and all other considerations.

3.  Why is there such an emphasis on rape and trafficking within the FBI?

Answer:  Honestly, there's a tremendous institutionalized set of sexual aggressions that are part of the U.S. military.  The FBI is just an extension of that, and the agency is profiting from those atrocities.  A huge percentage of enlisted personnel in the U.S. armed forces is raped at least once.

4.  Why?

Answer:  Because this is being used as a method of torture and coercion.  It has become a routinized way of gaining compliance and destroying individual sovereignty within the United States military.  And there have been task forces assigned to characterize this problem. So its extent is well-known.

The fact that the FBI has been profiteering from the organized trafficking of America's youth is less recognized, but more devastating.

5.  Why is it more devastating?

Answer:  Because the FBI has so much leeway at this time.  No one is reining it in to the extent required.  The FBI and its affiliate agencies have been preying upon America's youth through social media, working hand in glove with organized crime.  And any time the FBI extends a communications device to a young person, this is a virtual guarantee of rape and trafficking.

6.  Why is that the case?

Answer:  If you grant human traffickers 24/7 access to concealed communications with our sons and daughters in the name of "national security," the rape and trafficking are a foregone conclusion.  These crimes have been perpetrated so fiercely by the agencies, and the so-called "profits" are so extreme.  So, there's a practiced predation and a viciousness surrounding this trap.  And young people have no way out.

7.  Can't their parents help them?

Answer:  Do you know how many times and how many ways I have asked for help in forcing the FBI to stop trafficking my sons?

8.  And the FBI and its affiliates have not stopped trafficking them?  Have not stopped assigning assassinations?  Have not stopped assigning "cleaning"?

Answer:  They have not.

9.  Does President Trump know about the crimes that are now being perpetrated against your family, during his term in Office?

Answer:  This is an important question to ask, and I'm glad you're asking it.

10.  What is the answer?

Answer:  I do not believe that President Trump supports the rape and trafficking of my children and I do not believe that he supports the rape and trafficking of America's children as a whole.

11.  So, you're describing an FBI that is out of the control of anyone.

Answer:  Well, the FBI's lawlessness has been known for quite some time.  I think President Trump and FBI Director Kash Patel are attempting to change that equation.

12.  Can it be done?

Answer:  Those who are trafficking my children, and America's children as a whole, should be fired as soon as possible, in my opinion.  And after that, there should be an extensive inquiry about how and why the agency went wrong regarding this area. 

13.  How will the American public feel about an FBI which has profited from the trafficking of America's children, after their personnel have vowed to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic?

Answer:  I can tell you exactly how they'll feel, because it's how I feel.  They will feel devastated, as I have felt devastated.  They will feel outraged, as I have felt outraged.  They will feel indignant, as I have felt indignant.  They will feel infuriated, as I have felt infuriated.  And they will feel determined, as I feel determined. 

And as part of all that, we need to ask our elected and appointed officials to insist that this appalling abuse of authority by the FBI and its affiliates changes right away.

14.  You mentioned that the FBI appeared to threaten having rendered your animals ill with a zoonotic illness that affects the heart.  Is that the case?

Answer:  This was the statement of the FBI, so this could be heartworm or something more sophisticated.  Then again, they could assail the health of my puppies in a thousand different ways.  

15.  Can the puppies' health be restored, along with your family members' health and your own?

Answer:  This is certainly within the FBI's capability, so I hope others will insist on our restoration right away.

16.  Have you received FOIA reports or investigative reports as of this time, 5:51 on Tuesday, March 11, 2025?

Answer:  Not as of this time.  No, I have not yet received FOIA reports or investigative reports.

17.  Will you receive them?  Has anyone communicated to you that there is a commitment to provide them to you?

Answer:  I have received no communication that there is a timeline to provide them or a promise to provide them as of yet.  I do believe the Supreme Court would be inclined for me to have them, and if this is the case, I am most grateful to the Honorable Justices for that determination.

18.  A man dropped an Amazon package at your door yesterday, but somehow the Ring video only showed him walking away, not walking toward your door.  Was that Ring video edited by others?

Answer:  Yes, it most certainly appeared to be.

19.  May I ask the intent of his presence on your property?

Answer:  In the photo in which he is walking away, he appears to be wearing a bullet proof vest.  With his cap to complete the picture, he looks like Special Forces personnel sent to my property to file a false witness statement.

20.  And you had a white truck stationed directly outside of your property all day today, didn't you?

Answer:  Yes, I did.

21.  Did you feel that might have been related to the appearance of Special Forces personnel at your door?

Answer:  Clearly, yes.

22.  What lie could he have told?

Answer:  In the past the FBI has suggested ridiculous things like kidnappings, hostages, and serial killings.  The only way the agency could coerce that type of false witness statement at this stage would be from military personnel or contractors.  So, that's how bad the situation has become.

23.  Can you show us the photograph of this so-called Amazon driver walking away from your front door?

Answer:  Absolutely.  Here it is.  

24.  And what is the package he left, please?

Answer:  This one:

25.  And could this "Amazon driver" possibly have seen anything illegal on your property?  A sign of a kidnapping?  Illegal drugs or weapons?  Signs of violence or serial killing?

Answer:  I've been outside today.  I cannot see any signs of any of the horrific events you describe whatsoever.  The house looks normal.  The driveway looks normal.  So any such assertions are completely and entirely fabricated, and I just feel stunned that, after everything I have communicated to the D.A.'s and the local police department, this kind of abuse is still being perpetrated.

26.  Is this actually about certain individuals wanting to appropriate the 8.3 trillion dollars allegedly awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline and the ODNI?  Perhaps individuals within the DoD?

Answer:  That explanation seems all too likely, I'm sorry to say.

27.  Is there any intention to communicate with you fairly and honorably?  Any intention at all?

Answer:  I believe President Trump, Vice President Vance, the Congress, the DOJ, and the Supreme Court desire to communicate with me fairly and openly, yes.

28.  Can they prevail over and above a corrupt FBI and its wayward affiliates?

Answer:  I think there's a possibility.  I'm rooting for them, and I hope they're rooting for my family and me at the same time.

29.  You are currently receiving renewed threats that the Hotshots and the Woodside Fire Protection District could set fire to your property in Portola Valley, CA and that the Falmouth Fire Department could set fire to your property in Woods Hole, MA.  What are your thoughts about this?

Answer:  Outreach from an honorable government representative -- someone agreed upon by the White House, the Congress, and the DOJ -- will clearly be protective against such crimes.

30.  Will you please continue to let us know about the wellbeing of your family members, including your pets, in the coming days?

Answer:  Of course, yes.  This is the only way I have of keeping the spotlight on this highly challenging circumstance, and ensuring that my family has even the slightest amount of safety.

31.  The FBI has appeared to lie about the intent of upcoming trips your husband plans to make.  What do you feel are the odds of his being able to travel without egregious harm?

Answer:  This is unknowable, so I will not be making that assessment.

32.  Please recover your health, and remain safe and secure.

Answer:  Thank you for those kind wishes.

Lane MacWilliams

No Delivery of Reports on March 10, 2025 or in Previous Days

 OIG Hotline, this is to document that I did not receive reports yesterday, March 10, 2025, nor in the days prior to that date.  There were quite a few FedEx trucks which were traveling on Vista Verde Way yesterday, but I did not receive a FedEx delivery.  I removed my signature authorization for deliveries to be left at the top of my driveway.  Instead, tracked deliveries now need to be signed for by me directly.

If FedEx misreported a delivery to my address in recent days, the company extended false information.  In the event that this occurred, please resend a certified, sealed copy of this mailing to me, together with email notification of its anticipated arrival date.

Thank you for allowing me to document these details for your Office.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Claiming the Laudable and Worthy Path Forward

OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to be extending a series of serious threats to me this morning, and, unfortunately, I have no means of assessing the credibility of these threats nor the likelihood of their manifestation.

If I hold silent, and the threats are legitimate, my family and I will die.  If I speak, and the threats are legitimate, I may unknowingly violate confidentiality rules of the FBI and others about which I have never been informed, despite my repeated and respectful requests for information.

At issue is whether individual American citizens, questioning the malfeasance of the FBI, have the right to their lives in doing so, and whether in the future, they will ever have the right to their lives again.

In other words, is it a capital crime for an individual American citizen to observe that the FBI is endeavoring to commit capital crimes against one's own family or against oneself?

Is it a capital crime for an individual American citizen, having observed astonishing wrongdoing on the part of the FBI, to extend a Freedom of Information Act request and insist that it be duly fulfilled?

Is it a capital crime for an individual American to voice the importance of the sovereignty of her children, or to ask that they not be raped by the FBI's dictate, or to request that they not be trafficked by the FBI's design, or to suggest that they not be tortured in the FBI's coercion of false witness statements about her family?

Is it a capital crime for an individual American to assert her human rights against a predatory FBI, and will it always be a capital crime for her to do so?

Is the Declaration of Independence, in which the individual American's right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is taken as a self-evident truth, still representative of the ethos of our nation, still emblematic of its fierce spirit of benevolence and self-determination and freedom, all at once?

This is the question I now seek to answer, and this is the question I ask President Trump, Vice President Vance, the U.S. Congress, the OIG Hotline and the Supreme Court to help me clarify.

I appreciate the ethics of all who step forward at this time to insist that the individual American still possesses freedom of speech in the absence of her government's honorable and forthright communication asking for her confidentiality.

If the freedom of our words matters,  and it does, if the freedom of our opinions matter, and it does, if the uniqueness of our accomplishments matters, and it does, if the sovereignty of our souls matter, and it does, then the questions I am here asking of our honorable leaders matter very profoundly, indeed.

I hope they will now choose to stand with me in initiating discussions to address the most laudable and worthy path forward.

Lane MacWilliams

*******************************************************************************

Threats to the MacWilliams family on the morning of March 8, 2025 include but are not limited to the following:

• An apparent allegation that our pets have been targeted with a viral vector that can cause severe brain injury, heart attack or stroke through zoonotic transmission within a few days, weeks or months.

I regret that I do not possess the ability to assess the credibility of this claim, the existence of this technology, or the likelihood of manifestation.  Certainly, if this assertion is legitimate, I hope this documentation will prompt the immediate reversal of any such deployment.

No one in my family should be experiencing any kind of cognitive impairment, physical pain, ill health, functional deficits or demise.

• An apparent allegation that the tires on one or more of our family vehicles are now damaged to cause blowout, and further, that our cars are subject to spontaneous, remote-controlled airbag deployment, with the intent of causing loss of control of the vehicle.

Once again, I have no means of assessing the likelihood of this sabotage, or even whether the FBI possesses the ability to deploy airbags remotely.

• Apparent threats of the ongoing human trafficking of my children and MX by the FBI.

It seems these threats are designed to cause me the greatest distress a parent can face.  My children have indeed been trafficked by the FBI, and further, the agency appears to be trafficking America's children as well, a circumstance no leader can find acceptable for our worthy nation.

• Apparent threats from the FBI that my sons' sovereignty has been violated to such egregious degree that they can now be wrongfully directed to cause harm to themselves or others and not have the independent ability to decline such an order.

I am not here disclosing the means of these sovereignty violations, but I will say that these claims of the violations of the human rights of my family members appear legitimate, in my observation.  Accordingly, I ask that our leaders immediately step forward to return my family members' full sovereignty to them, with no further incursions into their sovereign decision-making capability.

• Apparent threats from the FBI of wrongfully claiming fraud or conspiracy because I am documenting threats to my family members' lives that have appeared on my cell phone this morning or previously.

To clarify for everyone, my cell phone has been hacked, as has my computer, against my will and without my consent.  That may be a conspiracy, but it's not mine.

If the FBI suggests that a false witness statement has been documented by someone in my acquaintance, I may document the truth of my honorable interactions with others for the OIG Hotline.

But the preservation of my good name is not an act of conspiracy.  It is an act of survival.

If I had not set the record straight for the OIG Hotline with regard to my respectful and virtuous interactions with others, I would long since have perished from the judgments connected to false accusations which I have not had the privilege of examining or refuting in detail.

Whatever hints FBI personnel have extended to me regarding false witness statements of others may be viewed as "leaks" by some within the government.

From my perspective, they have simply represented the actions of men and women who have hoped I might preserve my own life in order, in the longterm,  to help abolish a system of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting within our nation that will inevitably result in the loss of sovereignty for all.

Yes, there have been some employees of the FBI and the DOJ who have appeared to help me to survive a system of false reporting which has been in every measure designed to steal my life.

Perhaps they acted because they thought I might have the strength to defend American's long term freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of assembly, right to privacy, right to own private property, and freedom of the press.

Have I benefited from those who have attempted to defend my life?

I am alive.

But financially, the target of interest program has impoverished my family and myself, ruined our properties, stolen our sovereignty, isolated our family and friends, threatened our lives daily with knowingly false criminal allegations. and defamed us to all.

That's not a conspiracy on my part, good people.  I think that's clear to see.

It seems to me that there are some leaders within our government who want to help ensure that the worthiness of our nation will survive our current travails.

I have not spoken with them, corresponded with them, or met with them.  But I'm glad they're present.  That's not fraud.  That's gratitude that I'm alive to write these words.  There is a difference.

Because of worthy leaders, our longterm freedoms have a chance to endure, but only if we now respect the rulings of the Supreme Court in my favor.

For the sake of our sovereignty, I ask us all to join together in upholding the Highest Court's decision to provide me with FOIA and investigative reports pertaining to my case.

I appreciate the integrity and ethics of all who commit to do so.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*******************************************************************************

Please allow me to once again extend the disclaimer that many threats received by me and extended by the FBI are unsubstantiated by me at this time.  Some threats constitute willful disinformation on the part of the FBI, without doubt.  I regret that I am unable to assess the credibility of every threat extended by this agency or its affiliates, and also that I am not in a position to judge the likelihood of manifestation.  Having said that, many of the FBI's threats toward my family in the past have manifested in real-world harms.  As a result, I believe that FBI threats extended to me must be viewed as potentially substantive.

Reason, Honor, and Integrity Must Now Prevail

OIG Hotline, the following email was copied to lead counsel for San Mateo County, Attorney David Silberman.

Attorney Silberman is allegedly out of the office until next Wednesday at FBI directive, given that he has expressed discomfort with the latest plans of harm the FBI has expressed toward my family members and myself.  It is, of course, possible that this absence is feigned in order to avoid Attorney Silberman's liability concerns.

OIG Hotline, everyone should be uncomfortable with further FBI plans of harm toward my family and myself, beginning with the FBI's alleged alteration of medication my older son is about to receive from Safeway Pharmacy at 525 in Menlo Park at 3:00 PM this afternoon.

My email below delineates the best course of action at this time, and I simply must observe that this is what leadership looks like.

Those who feel paralyzed by conflicting regulations, rulings, or priorities can simply post this email on their bulletin boards and they will know what to do next.

Let's make some tangible progress now, please, using our substantive talents to do so.

Thank you very much for your support, and the support of all others, in conveying to the FBI, the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, and all of their affiliates, that harm will no longer be tolerated in this case, and that reason, honor and integrity must now prevail.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

CPRA Request of San Mateo County Sheriff Christina Corpus

OIG Hotline, the following email, bearing the subject heading ATTN: SHERIFF CHRISTINA CORPUS Re: CPRA REQUEST, was sent to Sheriff Corpus, David Silberman, Karen Rosenthal, sheriffs_recordsrequest@smcgov.org, sheriffs_recsup@smcgov.org, sheriffcorpuscare@gmail.com, sheriffs_civil_enforcement@smcgov.org, and pio@smcgov.org at 6:09 AM today, March 6, 2025, with identical material forwarded to your Office at 6:24 AM.  The attachment mailed with this communication consists of my CPRA request of the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office.

Thank you for your support for Sheriff Corpus and for all those demonstrating a commitment to truth and integrity in law enforcement at this time.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams