1. Your Friday fax to ODNI and your FedEx mailings to the Honorable Avril Haines and the OIG Hotline Investigations Division may have been recently obstructed and/or altered.
Answer: It appears so. There is specific content within my material that the FBI does not want investigators to access. I posted it for a brief time yesterday, with the caveat that the contents were restricted. But I received a threat of arrest fairly rapidly after that, so I was forced to remove it.
2. What other means of communication are open to you?
Answer: There's not much, frankly. It seems that my faxes have been intercepted and altered in the past. FedEx mailings and certified mailing through U.S.P.S. have been intercepted. My email has demonstrated extensive tampering. Voicemail communications do not seem to be available to me at this time.
3. That sounds like a fairly complete silencing.
Answer: It certainly feels that way. And I would just like to state that, of all the civil liberties the FBI has taken away from the American public, I find the loss of free speech to be among the most devastating. This is a situation in which the FBI is obstructing an investigation of its own malfeasance, so the crimes are particularly acute.
But for the FBI to be paying contractors to record the everyday conversations of "targets of interest" and others, specifically so that this information can be aggregated, and in some cases, re-edited to discredit law-abiding American citizens -- this is a devastating abuse of the public trust.
4. Have you seen a public example of this recently?
Answer: Yes. I was watching CNN a couple of weeks ago, when Jake Tapper played a voicemail of President Biden addressing a private family issue of drug addiction in expressing concern for his son. I think it's important to state that President Biden was extremely supportive, insightful, and loving during the message that was played. Families that are in the throes of addiction are not always so calm -- and that is perfectly understandable. But to play this message publicly was a horrific violation of the privacy of the Biden family. There is no earthly justification for this kind of breach. And no news editor worth his or her salt would deign to violate the private family life of a sitting President of the United States in this manner.
5. You were offended by CNN's foray into this realm.
Answer: Deeply offended on President Biden's behalf, yes. And further, I wondered how many Americans would pause to ask themselves how such a voicemail ever ended up in the hands of the news media to begin with. Are we to believe that Hunter Biden sold it? That's not credible. That a housekeeper recorded it at the time? I don't find that believable either.
6. Then how did this private voicemail end up on CNN?
Answer: The NSA records and aggregates every phone conversation engaged in by every American in the United States. Without a warrant. Without justification. The greatest likelihood is that the NSA and FBI released this information to the news media as a political ploy intended to damage the public perception of President Biden and his family in advance of the Midterm Elections.
7. If that is true, then we would have an example of the national security apparatus of the United States, which is meant to be apolitical, utilizing illegally obtained information in an attempt to affect the outcome of an ostensibly democratic election.
Answer: That is correct.
8. What if an American citizen is recorded in the middle of a marital disagreement, or losing his or her temper, or shedding some tears over a disappointment?
Answer: That's the question, isn't it? What if the FBI is eager to discredit anyone who objects to its totalitarian gambit? Isn't it possible that anyone at all could be defamed? If the FBI doesn't have recordings that can be misused in this manner, it can simply re-edit separate conversations to create a conversation that never transpired.
9. In the world of disinformation as wielded by the FBI, it becomes possible to discredit anyone.
Answer: Yes, it does. And it's necessary to understand the reasons why the FBI would engage in such crimes. It's necessary to comprehend the agency's objectives.
10. What are those objectives?
Answer: Complete social, economic and physical control over the American public, and, by extension, other populations as well.
11. Totalitarian rule, despite the fact that we have an ostensible democracy.
Answer: A democracy involves freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of assembly, a free press, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, on and on. We cannot be satisfied with the presence of a pageant of democracy, a performance of its traditions, without insisting that the fundamental civil liberties and human rights it represents are vigorously upheld.
12. Do you feel that you are being silenced as an FBI whistleblower at the same time that the FBI is undertaking a concerted effort to discredit your truthful testament to its law-breaking?
Answer: Without question. The FBI is apparently endeavoring to discredit me through the means it uses to disparage all whistleblowers, which involves allegations of psychological instability centrally. Has the agency coerced the false testaments of Mr. Doug Bodin (to whom I have never spoken), Dr. Jacob Ballon and Dr. Kristen Stent, none of whom are my physicians, to attempt to discredit me, as has been alleged? In one case, I have evidence that it has happened.
13. What evidence do you have?
Answer: I have notes in my husband's handwriting from a conversation he had with Dr. Jacob Ballon in which my husband documents Dr. Ballon's assertion, based on no evidence whatsoever, that I possess a "delusional disorder."
14. You believe that Dr. Jacob Ballon was coerced into extending this false assertion.
Answer: I do. Dr. Ballon doesn't know me at all. Any assertion he is rendering about my psychological health is categorically false. The same holds true for Mr. Doug Bodin, whom I have never met, and Dr. Kristen Stent, whom I chatted with via Zoom for ten minutes together with my husband as she was commencing treatment of my son. These people are not my physicians, and the false assertions they are extending at the behest of the FBI violate their professional ethical standards in every conceivable way.
15. But the FBI is attempting to assert you are unbalanced in some manner, even as they silence hard facts you are trying to convey to investigators within the OIG Hotline.
Answer: Yes.
16. Has your son Duncan been pressured to make these assertions as well?
Answer: I have reason to believe so. Recently, my stalker has made myriad allegations that Duncan, at the direction of his FBI handler, has falsely alleged that I possess a personality disorder known as "narcissism." Prior to that, on Christmas Day of 2021, Duncan suggested that it was "unbalanced" to think that he had been approached by FBI personnel to report on his law-abiding parents.
17. Yet, you felt confident that he had, in fact, been approached.
Answer: Yes, I felt certain of it.
18. Why, may I ask?
Answer: In October of 2021, Duncan called me on the phone, out of the blue. This was unusual, because Duncan almost always sends text messages as opposed to phoning. The entire purpose of the call, as far as I was able to ascertain, was his message to me that I should stop pursuing the contents of San Mateo County Case Reports #19-11840 and #20-02355, both of which had been unlawfully withheld from me.
19. You were pursuing that information through a Writ of Mandamus petition at the Santa Clara County Superior Court, is that correct?
Answer: Yes, I was. But what was most remarkable about Duncan's call was that I had not informed him that I was pursuing the court case. My husband had not mentioned it to him either. Someone had informed him all about the court case, and further, that someone had advised him to tell me to abandon my legal quest.
20. And you think that someone was the FBI, which did not want its engagement in falsified law enforcement reporting against the law-abiding American public to be discovered.
Answer: I do. Shortly after that phone call, Duncan called my husband to tell him that, if I did not abandon my court case, Duncan was receiving threats that his whole life might be "ruined." The FBI is the only agency I know of that trains its agents to threaten to "ruin the lives" of witness informants if they do not agree to comply with FBI demands.
21. And in this way, the agency's threats and incentives have become indistinguishable from those of organized crime.
Answer: True. Through extensive threats and lavish bribes, the FBI believes it can enforce the cooperation of anyone. Anyone at all.
22. And yet, that cooperation is not complete.
Answer: No, it's not. President Biden is pushing back against the FBI's attempt to wrest power away from the American electorate. Parts of ODNI are holding strong. Parts of the DOJ.
23. And you yourself.
Answer: Yes, I myself remain strong, despite the FBI's crimes of slander, defamation, obstruction, and more.
24. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?
Answer: I do.
Lane MacWilliams
**********************************************************************************
At the end of my posts regarding the unlawful actions of far-right personnel within the FBI, I will be adding the following statement. The FBI is a deeply divided agency. There are many FBI employees who view their vows to the Constitution with the utmost seriousness and honor, and who strive to defend the fundamentals of our democracy with courage, fortitude and commitment. The fact that some segments of the FBI appear to have embraced a lawless course is not a justification to assail the FBI in general. The safety of FBI agents should be protected, just as the safety of the American citizenry should be protected. As President Joseph R. Biden has so rightly expressed, violence is never justified in any circumstance. The rule of law must always be honored and upheld. It is our shared determination to preserve the civil liberties and human rights of ALL AMERICANS that renders the United States a democracy. We must never abandon this promise. All of our most cherished freedoms depend upon it.
No comments:
Post a Comment