Redacted Complaint, Submitted to the OIG Hotline on June 29, 2025

 OIG Hotline, I am including a copy of my complaint submitted through your online portal yesterday, June 29, 2025, although it appears here with more extensive redactions.

Please be apprised that my sons and MX appear to have suffered extensive sovereignty violations over the past seven days, together with intentional disease dissemination by the FBI that has rendered them in despair.

I would respectfully request that you reach out to them on an immediate basis to determine their medical needs and offer urgent support.

It is appropriate to worry that my beloved family members, on experiencing repeated and vicious torture, may give up hope that they can ever be restored, ever be sovereign, ever reclaim their identities, their dignity, their personhood, their souls as they were before all FBI harm was perpetrated against them.

We must demonstrate to them that they can be rehabilitated, healed and restored to themselves in every measure.

If the long term sovereignty of mankind matters to us all, the restoration of my family members matters to us all.

Let us understand the necessity of their healing as proof that in the long term our sovereignty can be reclaimed in its entirety as the soul's provenance.

The ethical mandate of a worthy nation will demand no less.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*********************************************************************************

OIG Hotline, this complaint pertains to repeated break-ins of my hotel room and car over recent days and weeks.

I have returned to my hotel suite with both of my dogs in my company to find dog food scattered on the bathroom floor by an unknown party.  I have returned to my hotel suite to find that items placed on the balcony have been moved to the interior of the suite.

I have returned to my car to find the sunroof open, the windows rolled down, and the trunk open on three separate occasions.

The FBI appears to have made repeated allegations of food tampering, and, indeed, my dogs have often been inexplicably ill.

For my own part, my hxxxx and lxxxx are extremely painful, both a direct result of what the FBI claims to be pxxxxxxxx, previously described to your Office.  Please be aware of the FBI's claims of deployment of unfamiliar and, indeed, unnatural pxxxxxxxx, which progress and harm victims much more rapidly that other infections or infestations.

At this time, the FBI appears to claim that it intends to cause me hxxxx failure within six months.

This targeting may be the result of Dxx harms in combination with the above.

But I view the claim seriously, knowing something about the FBI's capabilities and intent, and I think the perpetration of these latest harms is truly saddening and utterly unacceptable to any civilized society.

Meanwhile, the FBI claims that my children are continuing to suffer sovereignty violations by the FBI, human trafficking by the FBI, disease caused by the FBI, coercive demands by the FBI for false reporting about our family, wrongful directives to harm others, wrongful convictions of crimes directed by their handlers, and other forms of torture in direct retaliation for my ongoing documentation of the agency's crimes against my family members and myself.

So, this circumstance is utterly untenable and unsustainable.

It seems to me that, especially given a recent sensitive discovery I made regarding FBI conduct, xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx would have been perfectly positioned to extend confidentiality agreements and other necessary resolution of my case to date.

Instead, it appears as though the FBI intends to continue with plans of first-degree murder against my loved ones and myself.  The agency even alleges the ongoing intent to kill my beloved pets, along with all of the rest of us.

So, despite my best efforts, I cannot see any honorable conduct on the part of the FBI whatsoever.

(redacted content)

As I indicated to you via email, no one who is advocating for the sovereignty of her nation and the long term freedom of mankind should experience this kind of dishonorable falsified law enforcement reporting and physical harm from her government.

It is deeply saddening when a nation fails to honor and uphold the citizens who love it best.

So many opportunities are lost in this kind of abandonment of those with the highest possible integrity.

And a nation can never thrive when it pursues this kind of depraved, dishonest, and murderous course.

I will keep you closely updated with regard to this matter.

I appreciate your presence and your ongoing efforts to protect my life and those of my loved ones.

In the meantime, I would respectfully request a cessation of all torture of my family members and myself, including all human trafficking of my loved ones, sovereignty violations, brain damage, organ damage, torture and harm of our animals, Dxx deployments, Hxxxx deployments, dissemination of all false and/or defamatory information pertaining to my family, disease dissemination to my family, failure to reverse previous medical harms perpetrated against my family, environmental harm affecting my family and property, property, vehicle, and hotel room break-ins, and first-degree murder in any form.

OIG Hotline, I currently weigh 110 pounds at 5'10" tall.  I look like a concentration camp victim because of the pxxxxxxxx and physical harms the FBI has perpetrated against me.  To behave in this manner to someone who is endeavoring to help the nation as a whole and the long term sovereignty of our citizens is a deeply shameful and inexcusable course of action.  History will condemn it, as will everyone who profiteered from the torture of my family members and myself.

There is no Bitcoin account that will ever equal the safety of our children, the sanctity of our worship, the right to privacy and dignity we all possess, and the sovereignty of our hearts and minds.

The soul is not for sale, has never been for sale, and can never be for sale if our nation's future is to be worthy.

I deeply appreciate your ongoing advocacy in these most troubling circumstances.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Not at This Time

 1.  Do you support Senate and House passage of President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," currently being discussed within the halls of Congress?

Answer:  Not at this time.  Absolutely not.

2.  May I ask why?

Answer:  The President has prevented Canada's officials from reaching out to me regarding my case, all the while my life has been under active and ongoing threat in Whistler, B.C.  There have been ongoing break-ins of my hotel room and car.  Further, it appears that critical communications from me to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline have been willfully obstructed over recent days.

The "Big Beautiful Bill" should not pass while my family members and I myself are suffering harm, harassment, defamation, obstruction, falsified law enforcement reporting which endangers our lives, and torture from the FBI with the assent of the Executive Branch.

There needs to be direct outreach to me from Canadian officials, and that outreach needs to be supported on an immediate basis by the entirety of the Congress, the DOJ, and the Supreme Court.

No one should be able to silence a whistleblower of FBI malfeasance against her family while endeavoring to profiteer from her torture and the torture of her family members.

In directing immediate and honorable outreach from Canadian officials, President Trump will be indicating that he is insisting that our human rights and civil liberties be upheld and protected on an urgent basis.

And that has simply not happened yet.

I will be the first to acknowledge when my case is being appropriately addressed with me, and I will maintain necessary confidentiality in that process.

But again, these critical communications have simply not yet occurred.

3.  President Trump has been dealing with a number of international crises over the last week.  Is it possible that he is simply unaware of the harm that has been willfully perpetrated against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  Of course that is possible.  If that is the case, I would hope that this blog post would remedy that deficit.

4.  In other words, you would still accept outreach from appropriate Canadian officials at this time.

Answer:  I would.

5.  Did the OIG Hotline receive the complaint you filed with their Office yesterday?

Answer:  That is not clear, which is why I will be publishing segments of it on this blog shortly.

6.  It seems that you may have suffered intentional defamation over the last week even while your attempts to defend yourself with truthful documentation have been willfully obstructed.  Is that your impression?

Answer:  It is, yes.  And I will certainly be disclosing more about the details of how difficult it has been not to be able to be safe from defamation when taking a simple elevator ride in one's hotel, using the stairwell in one's hotel, taking one's dogs to the dog park, etc.   These are normal human activities.  People need to be able to travel safely, without defamation and false reporting, to the ground floor of their hotel.  And people need to be able to walk their dogs without being lied about in false statements to corrupt law enforcement personnel.  Further, people need to be able to access food, water and environmental safety without fear for their fundamental security.  

7.  Have all of these basic rights been wrongfully taken away from you?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Without question.

I cannot go to the dog park without helicopters flying overhead at this point.  My circumstance is truly extreme.

8.  Don't helicopters sometimes fly over dog parks in Canada?

Answer:  Every time a particular person tries to exercise her dogs?  No.  No, they don't.

9.  What other kind of deceit has the FBI engaged in recently?

Answer:  I will be illuminating some of the apparent schemes shortly, but, as an immediate example, I will recount this particular circumstance, since it's current.  On Saturday, my husband wired $1,000 in American dollars to Western Union here in Whistler, B.C.  I need cash for incidentals and tipping, and he was kind enough to extend this to me as a temporary solution. 

10.  What appears to be the problem?

Answer:  The FBI appears to be falsely reporting that I am scheduled to accept large wires of funds through Western Union the moment I go to the location.  So, once again, I am being prevented from living my normal life due to FBI schemes suggesting that I am accepting some form of payoffs for illegal activity of some kind.

11.  Specifically, the FBI has wrongfully suggested that you are accepting huge payoffs from Chinese sources.  Isn't that the case?

Answer:  Chinese, North Korean, Russian.  It's a fairly consistent list, but yes.  The FBI appears to be endeavoring to create a narrative of payoffs that I simply have not accepted or assented to -- nor would I ever accept or assent to.

12.  What are the payoffs meant to be compensating you for, may I ask?

Answer:  Since the FBI appears to have sold intellectual property of some unknown kind to foreign buyers without my knowledge or consent, I'm going to guess that the agency is now trying to create a false narrative that furthers that wrongful allegation.  The FBI is always trying to justify itself.  This is an agency that simply never admits wrongdoing, even when presented with incontrovertible evidence.

13.  The FBI allegedly sold your unfinished novel to foreign buyers.  Isn't that true?

Answer:  Yes, that allegation has been made to me many times.

14. Will America suffer from a loss of confidence if it becomes known that the FBI has stolen your personal intellectual property and sold it without your knowledge or consent?

Answer:  You know, I think you're asking a question about whether there are programs within the FBI that stand well outside the agency's mission and objectives. 

Our national sovereignty depends partly on the confidence of honorable Americans, and, indeed, legal immigrants, that their intellectual property belongs to them and can be created, developed and realized by them in the manner that they see fit.

No nation can thrive in the event of institutional violations of intellectual property rights.  It's simply not possible.

15.  Will you be able to let us know if you receive outreach which meets your professional standards?

Answer:  Yes.  I may not be able to identify the particular form or origin of that outreach.  But if it meets my professional standards, I will be indicating so.

16.  Please keep us updated about your safety and security, as well as all of these pressing matters of concern.

Answer:  Thank you for your concern.  I certainly will.

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Communications to the OIG Hotline

 OIG Hotline, due to the fact that there may have been tampering or obstruction pertaining to my communications to your Office over recent days, and, in fact, prior to that, I am including herewith screenshots of my gmail accounts for your reference.

Please cross-check to ensure that you have received all information I have sent to you.  In the event that there is material missing from your records, please let me know directly so that I can provide the information to you immediately.

Thank you for your support regarding this critical matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

More Truth for the U.S. Public at Large

 1.  On December 2, 2024, the New York Times published an article regarding President Biden's investment in a system to detect geoengineering of the sun should it be perpetrated by some unknown billionaire.  Is that your understanding?

Answer:  The article was entitled The U.S. Is Building An Early Warning System to Detect Geoengineering.  https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/28/climate/geoengineering-early-warning-system.html

2.  Did you see any problems with this article?

Answer:  The main problem with the piece is that our most advanced technologies as human beings are nowhere close to effecting geoengineering of the sun.

3.  There is no military system that is near to achieving this alteration?

Answer:  Again, humanity doesn't possess this advancement at the current time.

4.  But is geoengineering of the sun a threat that has been extended to the United States?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

5.  The United States military is attempting to assess whether and when such tampering may be perpetrated.  Is the military genuinely worried about that possibility?

Answer:  The concerns of the U.S. military are sincere, yes.

6.  So someone has threatened to perpetrate geoengineering of the sun if the U.S. military does not comply with other objectives that may not be in our national interest.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That is correct, yes.

7.  And that someone is not represented by a rogue billionaire or a wayward totalitarian state.

Answer:  No, it is not.

8.  What does the U.S. military require in order to reclaim some meaningful degree of sovereignty in this situation?

Answer:  There needs to be public awareness over the problem, frankly, so that our military has more freedom in which to address the threat.

9.  You feel there is too much reticence over this issue, is that right?

Answer:  This issue and a thousand more.  We need to see more real information getting to the public so that our leaders have more room in which to effect meaningful improvements in our long term security.

10.  You were told that there was a recent order to take your life via sniper action, presumably pertaining to your knowledge of certain events in 2022, about which you may be asked to testify.  Is that true?

Answer:  It is true, unfortunately.  It would be best for the government to reach out to me through embassy personnel on an immediate basis so that my safety and that of my loved ones can be protected.

11.  Please keep in close contact with us regarding your safety and wellbeing under these highly unusual circumstances.

Answer:  I certainly will.

Lane MacWilliams

A Conversation on Sovereignty

 1.  Some of your most serious concerns relating to the long term future of humanity in general and Americans in particular pertain to individual sovereignty.  Is that correct?

Answer:  It is, yes.  Individual sovereignty and national sovereignty are closely linked, for the simple reason that our elected leaders are expected to maintain both simultaneously in order to manifest the best future for others.  So, when we think about sovereignty as a national priority, we need to consider the ways in which, long term, we plan to support its reclamation and defense on behalf of the individual citizen.

2.  What does individual sovereignty mean in specific terms?

Answer:  It means that our thoughts and expressions reflect our own cognition and speech and no one else's.  It means that our speech is free and uncontrolled, not guided, shaped, directed or controlled by handlers, agencies, propaganda, or anyone or anything else.  It means that people who think differently should not be punished in the long term, nor should their loved ones.  Nor, long term, should the future of any citizen be diminished if they elect to speak out in defense of the human rights of others.

In the short term, we're going to have more uniformity of public opinion, print journalism, television reporting, research publications and educational curricula.  And this is true for many reasons.  

But in the long term, we don't want homogeneity in analysis, the interpretation of historical and current events, journalism, scientific research, artistic contributions, or political thought.  We will want multiplicity and breadth and depth and contrasting theories and opinions.  We will want civil disagreement, and civil discourse to express that disagreement, in the process of reclaiming true freedom of speech.

3.  Will humanity manifest true self-governance in the future?

Answer:  There are global concerns such as the environmental health of the planet that will require much closer feedback loops than the public has known heretofore.  So, this will represent a dramatic long term change in the procedures of governance.  

And, as I have said elsewhere, I would recommend that our military play a role that is front and center with regard to communicating with the public about certain benchmarks, recommendations and follow through.  In this way, the public will immediately understand that certain environmental concerns transcend politics and the public must pay closer attention and cooperate with adaptations guided by our military leaders.

Beyond this, we won't see 10 billion or 15 billion or 20 billion people in terms of long term worldwide population.  The current trajectories will not hold.  Instead, in the long term, we will see human populations at a relatively low and stable level, and everyone will be participating in the manifestation of those goals.

But other than these new limitations, we do have the potential to realize self-governance in the long term future.

And that achievement will best be accomplished with the United States assuming a position of global leadership regarding certain international concerns.  

The national sovereignty of the United States in the long term will translate to the possibility of individual sovereignty within human societies throughout the world.  So, our leadership's engagement with long term sovereignty issues as a separate policy sphere at this juncture is absolutely critical and must not be overlooked.

4. Humanity is making fairly rapid advancements technologically at this time.  Is that your view?

Answer:  Our military science is far in advance of our civilian science.  But yes, we are making some transformative advancements, and with the advent of AI, we will make many more.

The real challenge for us is not an assessment of our technological capabilities, which, while impressive for us, are still comparatively simple in history's broad reach.  The real challenge for us is to maintain the best of what defines us as human -- our capacity for learning, creation, love, courage, epiphany, insight, transformative individual development and resonant spiritual growth -- through periods of great change and upheaval.

Humanity's potential for greatness and transcendent growth must not be abandoned in the exigencies of the world's immense challenges in the short term.

We need to hold to our vision for the best of humanity, and we need to insist that we protect and preserve our best -- no matter what travails the short term may bring.

5.  Your loved ones have experienced sovereignty violations, as have you yourself, given your role as a whistleblower pertaining to certain FBI programs.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

6.  Are you able to speak to your personal experience of encroachments on your own sovereignty without compromising information others may consider confidential?

Answer:  I need to consider the confidentiality issues for the FBI, but I would like to be able to address this in a meaningful way, yes.  The FBI has endeavored to build in "human insurance" with regard to my potential disclosures by trafficking my sons and MX and also by forcing them to commit certain acts at the directive of their handlers.  So, they can be arrested or killed at any time, and all of this is true due to the fundamental violations of their sovereignty that should never have occurred.

7.  Will you give your further commentary on this subject some thought?

Answer:  I will.

8.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

A Letter to Two Embassies Requesting Intervention

 1.  How is your safety and security within Whistler, B.C. at the current time?

Answer:  I would rate it as poor.  It's difficult for me to ride an elevator or take my dogs for a walk without a threat of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, physical harm or kidnapping.  So, I continue to be needlessly imperiled, without question.

2.  You have requested help from the U.S. Ambassador to Canada and the Canadian Ambassador to the U.S.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

3.  And will that help be forthcoming?

Answer:  I don't believe the ambassadors wish to see me come to harm and I don't believe they wish to see my dogs harmed either.  So, I hope their concerns will prevail in this circumstance.

4.  Did you originally send your communication to the Embassies confidentially?

Answer:  I did.  However, a prompt response was not forthcoming.

5.  Are you now willing to publish your emailed letters to the Embassies in order to fully document your communications to them?

Answer:  I am, yes, and this is due to security concerns that are mounting and as yet unaddressed.

6. When were these emails originally sent, please?

Answer:  They were sent on Monday, June 16, 2025 at 3:27 PM Pacific Time.

7.  What was the subject line, please?

Answer:  It was Priority Request for Embassy Intervention to Ensure Safety and Security of U.S. Traveler to Canada.

8.  Thank you for sharing this documentation with us this afternoon.  Please check back with us as soon as possible to let us know how your safety is being supported.

Answer:  You are quite welcome, and I will continue to update my blog with the status of our health and wellbeing.

Lane MacWilliams

The Fanfare for a Substantive Change

 1.  What are your thoughts about recent events in California?

Answer:  The looting and the fires have been planned by outsiders.  There are a few in Congress who are getting this right in terms of the instigators.  But of course this represents a serious situation.

2.  What are your thoughts about Gavin Newsom's rather embattled position?

Answer:  Governor Newsom is in an exceptionally difficult position given the manner in which California has experienced conflict.  Further, the difficulties will grow.  So, he's managing a circumstance the origins of which are occluded.

3.  Will we see increasing arrests of Democratic politicians?

Answer:  Unfortunately, we will.  And I say this because I don't like to see the arrest of any elected political officials.

4.  In the near term?

Answer:  In the near term, yes.

5.  Does the military parade on June 14th mark the advent of martial law?

Answer:  It's the fanfare for a substantive change in our rules of governance, yes.

6.  Does the public fully understand what it represents?

Answer:  My family doesn't fully understand what it represents, so I highly doubt the general public does.

7.  Why is this?

Answer:  As human beings, we resist change and we resist the harbingers of change.  Many of us rely on the structures of denial and delay -- and these stratagems will no longer postpone this transition.

8.  Are you worried about your family members at this time?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Extremely worried about them.  They continue to be threatened and harmed by the FBI in an unconscionable manner.  Both of my sons are currently being pressed for knowingly falsified witness statements regarding my family.  So, it's a terrible situation, and there can be no question about the extremes of this circumstance.

9.  Is it true that you yourself are now being targeted with Dxxs in your hotel room in Whistler, B.C.?

Answer:  Unfortunately, this targeting has occurred, yes.

10.  Can the hotel halt that process?

Answer:  This is my written request, so I certainly hope so.  I do note that I have not received a response from the hotel management as of this time, at 4:21 PM on Friday afternoon, June 13, 2025.

11.  CNN and MSNBC are not available in your hotel room, only Fox News.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

12.  You would ordinarily choose to take in news from multiple perspectives, but this is no longer possible.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  Multiplicity of opinions can deepen and inform our understanding of any given situation.  But that breadth in journalism is disappearing, and we need to be ready for it.

13.  You and your family -- and even your pets -- are also now being threatened with the deployment of non-conventional vectors of harm at this time.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes, and the non-conventional vectors of disease are deadly and often rapid.  If they don't convey acute disease, they can simply cause heart attack or disabling brain damage in short order, so these threats are quite lethal in and of themselves.

14.  Will you please keep us apprised of your wellbeing, and that of your family and pets?

Answer:  Of course.

15.  Thank you for sharing your insights this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

A Whistleblower in Whistler, a Family Left Behind

 1.  The FBI appears to allege that your older son was trafficked by his handler Axxxxx yesterday.  Is this the case?

Answer:  The allegation has been made, yes.  Obviously, I'm in Canada and cannot verify this allegation.  I can say that he was slurring his words when I spoke to him in the late afternoon, and this usually indicates that he has been forcibly raped and abused by the FBI and its affiliates.

2.  What is the agency trying to do in harming your family members so viciously and gratuitously?

Answer:  You know, totalitarian regimes often punish the family members of writers and journalists.  This is a well-known pattern.  Clearly, we would hope that our leaders would be determined to prevent any such initiatives.

3.  The FBI is also threatening to arrest other members of your immediate family based on knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting.  This threat has been long standing, but has it taken on a new urgency now?

Answer:  It has, yes.  There has been an allegation that more Americans than usual are crossing the border into Canada at this time, and that the United States has implemented a new checkpoint at the border, where Americans are being aggressively questioned by American personnel about why they are leaving the country right now.  If this allegation is true, the FBI would certainly be resentful, as would a number of others in Washington, D.C.

4.  Has the FBI stated that the border might close?

Answer:  There are circumstances under which the border could suddenly close.  The FBI has appeared to suggest that it has been tasked with writing a new border policy that will make it much more difficult for Americans to pass freely across the U.S. /Canadian border in both directions.  Americans who travel to Canada may need to apply for re-entry without re-entry guaranteed.  Americans may not be allowed to travel to Canada at all except for pre-approved reasons.  All of this could effectively close the border.

5.  What are the circumstances under which the border could suddenly close?

Answer:  While I cannot comment on current circumstances within the United States or even globally at this time, I will say that from a historical perspective, mass arrests have been accompanied by severe restrictions of civilian travel.  And these limitations have appeared suddenly, without advance notice.  Again, this is documented history, and people are perfectly capable of referencing these events in the 1930's and during other periods.  This information is public.

6.  Does the FBI appear to be afraid that you might apply for political asylum given your role as a whistleblower of the FBI's knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against your family members and yourself, in addition to the agency's sovereignty violations against all of you?

Answer:  Yes, the FBI does seem to be focused on this fear.  There appears to be an effort to take my life and those of my family members before that can happen.  So, again, we're facing a new urgency with regard to the FBI's threats against us.

7. Can you comment on your current level of safety?

Answer:  The FBI appears to be alleging that the Supreme Court's efforts to protect us are being ignored in the context of an executive order of a military deployment intended to take one or more of our lives. Hence, the sniping threats, the mentions of attempts to deploy non-conventional vectors of disease, the threats of arrest, Parkinson's onset, ALS onset, dementia onset, damaging changes to our foundational health, brain damaging targeted deployments, heart attack, heart disease, cancer, "natural disasters," car bxxx threats, threats of sudden airbag deployment, threats of staged car accident, threats of car theft, threats of arrest, threats of drug overdose, threats of staged suicide, threats of drowning.  This list goes on and on, unfortunately.

8.  Your hotel, the Delta Whistler Village Suites, appears to be attempting to protect your life, despite FBI demands that staff cooperate with a plan of harming you.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Ben Thomlinson and his boss, Matt, have both communicated to me that they are supporting my safety and security.  And I believe the owner of the hotel has made a commitment to the safety and security of the guests of the Hotel , despite pressure to do otherwise.  So, I find this to be heartening.

9.  What about the FBI's allegation that the agency is trying to co-opt individual housekeeping staff?

Answer:  I have not verified that allegation, and I have no comment other than to say that I hope housekeeping will be guided by management to reject all overtures from the FBI and its affiliates.

10.  What is your impression of Canada at this time?

Answer:  I am grateful for Canada's warm welcome at this time, and I hope to continue to express that  Canadians' conscientious offer of sanctuary at this moment is deeply meaningful to me.

So, too, the ongoing efforts of the OIG Hotline and others on my behalf is profoundly hopeful.

11.  Thank you for your time this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

In Defense of the Defenseless

 1.  The FBI is demanding your puppies for what reason exactly?

Answer:  The FBI is afraid that the puppies represent certain verifiable facts regarding the agency's atrocities.

2.  Do they?

Answer:  Generally speaking, the FBI's fears of being caught are well-founded in fact.  So, I'm sure the agency is worried for genuine reasons, and I'm also sure they have no right to my dogs.

3.  Can't the FBI heal your dogs of all the problems the agency has caused?

Answer:  Of course it can.  There is simply an obstinacy and obstruction that are part of the culture of the FBI.  The agency doesn't like to admit being wrong.  And to reverse the harm to my dogs is to admit that the agency was wrong.

4.  The FBI has threatened to kill both you and your dogs if you insist that the dogs be rendered well.  Isn't that the case?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

5.  Do you believe the FBI has the capability to kill the dogs and to kill you yourself if you insist that your animals be restored?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  The FBI has the capability.

6.  So why won't you relent?

Answer:  To be clear, the FBI wants to kill and dissect my dogs.  It's not that the agency wants to run innocuous tests to see how they're functioning.  Further, the FBI has no specific need of my dogs in particular.  It is simply that the dogs are protective of me, and it is clear that I cherish them in turn.  These are the real reasons the FBI wants to claim my dogs for "scientific experimentation" to which I never consented.

The FBI would like to drag us all to the Island of Dr. Moreau, and I am declining.

My dogs have a right to their restored health, just as I have a right to my restored health, just as my family members have a right to their restored health.  And the FBI needs to comply with regard to all of these concerns.

7.  You are not willing to relinquish your dogs to euthanization and dissection by the FBI.

Answer:  I am not.

8.  Are the actions of the FBI in demanding your dogs reminiscent of some of the worst crimes of the Nazis toward animals?

Answer:  They are, without question.  The Nazis disallowed pet ownership among Jews simply because animals are such a source of love, sustenance, and joy within one's personal life, and there was a decided priority to steal from the Jews and other targeted populations everything good, virtuous, supportive, hopeful, meaningful, and renewing.

Of course, the Nazis were committing human atrocities that paralleled their atrocities against animals.

The experimentation on animals, children, and twins as a particular focus, was appalling from its inception and unconscionable at every stage of its implementation.

Overall, there was an attempt to dehumanize, impoverish and annihilate our most meaningful and loving bonds with others.

And this is exactly what we're seeing the FBI perpetrate at this time.

9.  You stand by your animals, and you will not abandon them.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  The FBI's atrocities against my puppies and my two cats, one of whom died as a result of FBI crimes, are not their fault.  My dogs are extremely important to me as loving and protective companions, and I will not relinquish them to the horrors of FBI experimentation.

10.  And you feel this way even at the risk of your own life?

Answer:  Perhaps it's worth considering how many times my animals have risked their lives in order to protect mine.  I can only advocate for the long term sovereignty of the United States and the long term freedom of mankind if I am alive.  Without my beloved pets, I would not be here to say that our most loving bonds must not be relinquished at this most difficult juncture in the history of our nation.

My pets matter not only to me in this regard.  They also matter to many.

11.  Please keep us updated with regard to your pets' wellbeing, your family members' wellbeing, and your own.

Answer:  I most certainly will.

Lane MacWilliams

The FBI Visits Whistler, British Columbia

 1.  What is your impression of your time in Canada to date?  You are in Whistler, British Columbia at this time, correct?

Answer:  Yes, I am.  Frankly, the FBI is extremely active here, having followed me from Surrey, British Columbia and Burnaby, British Columbia.

2.  How do you know they followed you?

Answer:  Some of the license plates on the white windowless vans are the same as those I was seeing 120 miles away two days ago.  I have photographed them as proof, but the third-party hack of my phone is preventing me from forwarding these photos to the OIG Hotline.

3.  Last night, you had the experience of seeing two turbaned gentlemen five minutes apart -- one at your hotel lobby reception desk after it was closed at 7:00 PM and the other filming you with his cell phone in the Village of Whistler.  What was your impression of these occurrences?

Answer:  You know, I'm sure that Sikhs are present in Whistler, but even so, I think these encounters were staged.  Strangers generally don't film me unless they're working for the FBI, which plans to alter the film with the help of AI later.  And to have two of these unusual incidents of crossing paths within five minutes seems indicative of false reporting.

4.  What would the FBI's false claims be in this instance?

Answer:  I'm guessing that the FBI doctored some cell phone footage and now is claiming that I'm a terrorist or that I support terrorists.  The whole narrative is so racist and hackneyed, it's deeply discouraging to me.  But this is the culture of the FBI, in truth.  The agency has a few well-worn narratives that it repeats and repeats and repeats.

5.  What are the threats you are receiving that are accompanying these unusual events?

Answer:  Today, it seems the FBI is threatening to expose me to HIV or other deadly virus through a non-conventional vector.  There are also sniping threats, given the supposedly "urgent" nature of  my non-existent crimes.  Beyond this, I am receiving threats that my sons will be kidnapped and never seen again, or that they will suffer ongoing torture, that my family members will suffer forced job loss, that my pets will be taken and killed, that my homes will be destroyed, on and on.

6. Do you feel safe in Whistler?

Answer:  Oh, no.  The community is fundamentally extremely safe, but, as I said, the FBI is here, and that changes everything.  The presence of the FBI can instantaneously remove safety from the most secure places on the planet.

7.  Do you have other examples of false reporting that are likely occurring?

Answer:  You can generally sense an FBI set-up when people are overly friendly.  This morning, a young woman named Shannon pushed very hard for my phone number with the alleged intent of helping to socialize my puppies with her five year old dog.

8.  How might that event be falsely reported?

Answer:  The FBI would typically take an occurrence like that and say that I pushed my phone number onto a young woman who was innocently passing by.  They would turn it into a predatory event, in which I was not the victim but the aggressor.  I happen to be heterosexual and monogamous.  Basically, the FBI just likes to reverse all truths.  Victims become aggressors in the FBI's false reporting.  Aggressors become victims within those narratives.  Once you understand this, you can grasp the agency's tactics more readily.

9.  Are there other instances of false reporting you can think of?

Answer:  Strangers have asked to take ownership of one of my dogs.  Strangers have asked to walk my dogs for me.  Strangers have asked me whether I have room for significant relationships, given the demands of my dogs.  I view these comments as unusual.

10.  Do you view the FBI's threats to kidnap or kill your dogs as serious threats?

Answer:  Yes, I do.  There are reasons why the FBI is interested in my dogs from an experimental perspective.

11.  But are your dogs an FBI experiment?

Answer:  My dogs are members of my family, as is my cat and any other pet my family members or I might acquire.  I am endeavoring to make that clear.

12.  You hold the expectation that your dogs will be rendered well by the FBI and that they will live long and joyful lives, alongside your own.

Answer:  Yes, I do.

13.  Are there those who are supporting your safety and that of your family members while you are in Canada?

Answer:  I certainly hope so.

14.  Do you hope that your concerns regarding your case will be addressed to your satisfaction while you are in Canada?

Answer:  Most decidedly.

15.  Please be careful regarding your safety and security in every setting.

Answer:  Thank you for your thoughtfulness regarding this issue.  I most certainly will.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams