1. Some of your most serious concerns relating to the long term future of humanity in general and Americans in particular pertain to individual sovereignty. Is that correct?
Answer: It is, yes. Individual sovereignty and national sovereignty are closely linked, for the simple reason that our elected leaders are expected to maintain both simultaneously in order to manifest the best future for others. So, when we think about sovereignty as a national priority, we need to consider the ways in which, long term, we plan to support its reclamation and defense on behalf of the individual citizen.
2. What does individual sovereignty mean in specific terms?
Answer: It means that our thoughts and expressions reflect our own cognition and speech and no one else's. It means that our speech is free and uncontrolled, not guided, shaped, directed or controlled by handlers, agencies, propaganda, or anyone or anything else. It means that people who think differently should not be punished in the long term, nor should their loved ones. Nor, long term, should the future of any citizen be diminished if they elect to speak out in defense of the human rights of others.
In the short term, we're going to have more uniformity of public opinion, print journalism, television reporting, research publications and educational curricula. And this is true for many reasons.
But in the long term, we don't want homogeneity in analysis, the interpretation of historical and current events, journalism, scientific research, artistic contributions, or political thought. We will want multiplicity and breadth and depth and contrasting theories and opinions. We will want civil disagreement, and civil discourse to express that disagreement, in the process of reclaiming true freedom of speech.
3. Will humanity manifest true self-governance in the future?
Answer: There are global concerns such as the environmental health of the planet that will require much closer feedback loops than the public has known heretofore. So, this will represent a dramatic long term change in the procedures of governance.
And, as I have said elsewhere, I would recommend that our military play a role that is front and center with regard to communicating with the public about certain benchmarks, recommendations and follow through. In this way, the public will immediately understand that certain environmental concerns transcend politics and the public must pay closer attention and cooperate with adaptations guided by our military leaders.
Beyond this, we won't see 10 billion or 15 billion or 20 billion people in terms of long term worldwide population. The current trajectories will not hold. Instead, in the long term, we will see human populations at a relatively low and stable level, and everyone will be participating in the manifestation of those goals.
But other than these new limitations, we do have the potential to realize self-governance in the long term future.
And that achievement will best be accomplished with the United States assuming a position of global leadership regarding certain international concerns.
The national sovereignty of the United States in the long term will translate to the possibility of individual sovereignty within human societies throughout the world. So, our leadership's engagement with long term sovereignty issues as a separate policy sphere at this juncture is absolutely critical and must not be overlooked.
4. Humanity is making fairly rapid advancements technologically at this time. Is that your view?
Answer: Our military science is far in advance of our civilian science. But yes, we are making some transformative advancements, and with the advent of AI, we will make many more.
The real challenge for us is not an assessment of our technological capabilities, which, while impressive for us, are still comparatively simple in history's broad reach. The real challenge for us is to maintain the best of what defines us as human -- our capacity for learning, creation, love, courage, epiphany, insight, transformative individual development and resonant spiritual growth -- through periods of great change and upheaval.
Humanity's potential for greatness and transcendent growth must not be abandoned in the exigencies of the world's immense challenges in the short term.
We need to hold to our vision for the best of humanity, and we need to insist that we protect and preserve our best -- no matter what travails the short term may bring.
5. Your loved ones have experienced sovereignty violations, as have you yourself, given your role as a whistleblower pertaining to certain FBI programs. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
6. Are you able to speak to your personal experience of encroachments on your own sovereignty without compromising information others may consider confidential?
Answer: I need to consider the confidentiality issues for the FBI, but I would like to be able to address this in a meaningful way, yes. The FBI has endeavored to build in "human insurance" with regard to my potential disclosures by trafficking my sons and MX and also by forcing them to commit certain acts at the directive of their handlers. So, they can be arrested or killed at any time, and all of this is true due to the fundamental violations of their sovereignty that should never have occurred.
7. Will you give your further commentary on this subject some thought?
Answer: I will.
8. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment