Not at This Time

 1.  Do you support Senate and House passage of President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," currently being discussed within the halls of Congress?

Answer:  Not at this time.  Absolutely not.

2.  May I ask why?

Answer:  The President has prevented Canada's officials from reaching out to me regarding my case, all the while my life has been under active and ongoing threat in Whistler, B.C.  There have been ongoing break-ins of my hotel room and car.  Further, it appears that critical communications from me to the Office of the Inspector General Hotline have been willfully obstructed over recent days.

The "Big Beautiful Bill" should not pass while my family members and I myself are suffering harm, harassment, defamation, obstruction, falsified law enforcement reporting which endangers our lives, and torture from the FBI with the assent of the Executive Branch.

There needs to be direct outreach to me from Canadian officials, and that outreach needs to be supported on an immediate basis by the entirety of the Congress, the DOJ, and the Supreme Court.

No one should be able to silence a whistleblower of FBI malfeasance against her family while endeavoring to profiteer from her torture and the torture of her family members.

In directing immediate and honorable outreach from Canadian officials, President Trump will be indicating that he is insisting that our human rights and civil liberties be upheld and protected on an urgent basis.

And that has simply not happened yet.

I will be the first to acknowledge when my case is being appropriately addressed with me, and I will maintain necessary confidentiality in that process.

But again, these critical communications have simply not yet occurred.

3.  President Trump has been dealing with a number of international crises over the last week.  Is it possible that he is simply unaware of the harm that has been willfully perpetrated against your family members and yourself?

Answer:  Of course that is possible.  If that is the case, I would hope that this blog post would remedy that deficit.

4.  In other words, you would still accept outreach from appropriate Canadian officials at this time.

Answer:  I would.

5.  Did the OIG Hotline receive the complaint you filed with their Office yesterday?

Answer:  That is not clear, which is why I will be publishing segments of it on this blog shortly.

6.  It seems that you may have suffered intentional defamation over the last week even while your attempts to defend yourself with truthful documentation have been willfully obstructed.  Is that your impression?

Answer:  It is, yes.  And I will certainly be disclosing more about the details of how difficult it has been not to be able to be safe from defamation when taking a simple elevator ride in one's hotel, using the stairwell in one's hotel, taking one's dogs to the dog park, etc.   These are normal human activities.  People need to be able to travel safely, without defamation and false reporting, to the ground floor of their hotel.  And people need to be able to walk their dogs without being lied about in false statements to corrupt law enforcement personnel.  Further, people need to be able to access food, water and environmental safety without fear for their fundamental security.  

7.  Have all of these basic rights been wrongfully taken away from you?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Without question.

I cannot go to the dog park without helicopters flying overhead at this point.  My circumstance is truly extreme.

8.  Don't helicopters sometimes fly over dog parks in Canada?

Answer:  Every time a particular person tries to exercise her dogs?  No.  No, they don't.

9.  What other kind of deceit has the FBI engaged in recently?

Answer:  I will be illuminating some of the apparent schemes shortly, but, as an immediate example, I will recount this particular circumstance, since it's current.  On Saturday, my husband wired $1,000 in American dollars to Western Union here in Whistler, B.C.  I need cash for incidentals and tipping, and he was kind enough to extend this to me as a temporary solution. 

10.  What appears to be the problem?

Answer:  The FBI appears to be falsely reporting that I am scheduled to accept large wires of funds through Western Union the moment I go to the location.  So, once again, I am being prevented from living my normal life due to FBI schemes suggesting that I am accepting some form of payoffs for illegal activity of some kind.

11.  Specifically, the FBI has wrongfully suggested that you are accepting huge payoffs from Chinese sources.  Isn't that the case?

Answer:  Chinese, North Korean, Russian.  It's a fairly consistent list, but yes.  The FBI appears to be endeavoring to create a narrative of payoffs that I simply have not accepted or assented to -- nor would I ever accept or assent to.

12.  What are the payoffs meant to be compensating you for, may I ask?

Answer:  Since the FBI appears to have sold intellectual property of some unknown kind to foreign buyers without my knowledge or consent, I'm going to guess that the agency is now trying to create a false narrative that furthers that wrongful allegation.  The FBI is always trying to justify itself.  This is an agency that simply never admits wrongdoing, even when presented with incontrovertible evidence.

13.  The FBI allegedly sold your unfinished novel to foreign buyers.  Isn't that true?

Answer:  Yes, that allegation has been made to me many times.

14. Will America suffer from a loss of confidence if it becomes known that the FBI has stolen your personal intellectual property and sold it without your knowledge or consent?

Answer:  You know, I think you're asking a question about whether there are programs within the FBI that stand well outside the agency's mission and objectives. 

Our national sovereignty depends partly on the confidence of honorable Americans, and, indeed, legal immigrants, that their intellectual property belongs to them and can be created, developed and realized by them in the manner that they see fit.

No nation can thrive in the event of institutional violations of intellectual property rights.  It's simply not possible.

15.  Will you be able to let us know if you receive outreach which meets your professional standards?

Answer:  Yes.  I may not be able to identify the particular form or origin of that outreach.  But if it meets my professional standards, I will be indicating so.

16.  Please keep us updated about your safety and security, as well as all of these pressing matters of concern.

Answer:  Thank you for your concern.  I certainly will.

Lane MacWilliams