1. You and your puppies are said to have suffered a very serious assault on your health on July 1, 2025. Is that the case?
Answer: Yes, it is.
2. There seems to have been a short term assurance that your recovery would be immediately prioritized. Was that your experience?
Answer: Yes, it was. There was the implication that we would be helped on an urgent basis.
3. How long did that assurance of support for your fundamental survival last, may I ask?
Answer: One day exactly. Less than 24 hours.
4. Did the withdrawal of support have anything to do with the fact that you have sought a consultation regarding your human rights within Canada?
Answer: I believe there was a direct correlation.
5. May I ask what the connection is?
Answer: The FBI appears to feel strongly that I not receive FOIA materials and investigative reports pertaining to my case to date, even though the Supreme Court has ordered provision of these materials. If I take certain steps within Canada, I would have the clear right to access those materials.
6. So the immediate withdrawal of a promise of life-saving health care for you, your family members and your pets is punitive in nature?
Answer: Almost certainly, yes.
7. Does President Trump have the ability to reassert your human rights in this instance? Does he have the power to direct the FBI to restore your health and that of your family members and pets in its entirety?
Answer: Yes, he does. He is the Commander in Chief. This is within his provenance.
8. The FBI possesses a powerful conflict of interest regarding this case, because the agency appears to regularly be attempting to misappropriate funds awarded in your name as payoffs for its own cronies. Does that conflict extend to the White House, by any chance?
Answer: You are asking a reasonable question under these circumstances. I think the Congress may be interested in the answer, as am I.
9. Would the restoration of your health and that of your family members and pets demonstrate that President Trump is insisting on the support of Constitutional rights for the honorable American public?
Answer: Most definitely. And I would say that the restoration of our health should be a long term guarantee, not a short term lever with which to extract or extort various concessions. It's relatively meaningless to be told that we will be restored to health over a period of 6-12 hours only to have that assurance reversed.
10. Has this been your experience with the FBI? That promises of the restoration of your health are short-lived and mercurial?
Answer: It has, yes. The agency is much more confident in causing gratuitous harm than it is apologetic in reversing those malevolent acts. At least, this is my consistent impression with regard to my own family.
11. Why is this the case?
Answer: There are many reasons for the problems within the institutional culture of the FBI, many of them dating back to the tenure of J. Edgar Hoover, who was deeply troubled psychologically.
12. You are asserting your access to your Constitutional rights one day in advance of the 4th of July, even though your life is being placed at risk over that insistence. Has that occurred to you?
Answer: Oh, yes. It certainly has. That confluence of events is not lost on me.
13. Will you be writing about the future of American independence tomorrow?
Answer: I hope to do so, yes.
14. Have you been asked to keep your puppies away from the general public for a certain period of time?
Answer: Someone appeared to mention that two weeks would be safest. But if our medical restoration has been withdrawn by the FBI, I don't know that that holds true.
15. You cannot keep your puppies locked up in your hotel room forever. They need some time outside, don't they? And isn't the FBI entirely responsible for this problem in the first place?
Answer: Yes, and yes.
16. Will you please inform us if the FBI elects to handle this situation responsibly, by reinstating your health care, your family's health care and your pets' health care?
Answer: I most certainly will. I know we would all feel reassured to see the FBI behaving with some belated honor in this matter.
17. In the past, the FBI has caused this type of harm and then gone before a judge to suggest that the agency's victims should be killed because they represent a danger to the public. Are you concerned about this horrific stratagem in your own case?
Answer: Of course, this represents a serious concern given the wayward tactics of the agency.
18. You are currently sitting in a Public Library. Is it safe for you yourself to be in public?
Answer: Ideally, I would have direct contact from someone within the FBI to ascertain all of these specifics. In answer to your question, I don't know. I don't have any symptoms, but I am self-monitoring carefully. The FBI has cut off my access to Wifi at my hotel, so I don't have ready options to communicate with the OIG Hotline from a confined residence. Beyond this, I need to take care of meals every day, etc. I do take public health considerations very seriously, and I would appreciate direct communication regarding this latest crime on the part of the FBI, to say the least. If this is a public health matter, the FBI should be handling itself with honor and integrity in open communication with me.
19. And you have not received that communication as of yet?
Answer: No, I have not.
20. Is the FBI also continuing to threaten to direct your sons to cause unknown harms to others?
Answer: Yes, these threats are continuous from the FBI. Absolutely unceasing. Together with the sovereignty violations of my sons, they represent astonishing violations of our human rights as a family and as citizens of the United States.
21. Please keep us closely informed of your circumstances, in addition to that of your pets.
Answer: Thank you for your concern for us. I most certainly will reach out on a regular basis.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment