1. Your younger son is traveling to Washington, D.C. today at the invitation of the White House. Can you tell us what this is regarding?
Answer: This is regarding President Trump's alleged order to my younger son through the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program to participate in plans intended to result in the loss of my life connected to his wedding next month in California.
2. Your sons have been forced to participate in plans intended to cause you grievous harm before, like the attempt on your life at Davies Symphony Hall several months ago. Isn't that the case?
Answer: Yes, it is.
3. Would you care to comment on this particular manner of deconstructing the very foundations of a loving American family?
Answer: Well, what I would say is that, in this case, the profit motive has clearly overwhelmed people, separating them from their lawful oaths to the public interest, the Constitution, and the future well-being of the nation.
4. Your sons should never have been conscripted into the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program should they?
Answer: They should not. This violated every ethical guideline that one could imagine in terms of government conduct toward the family of an FBI whistleblower.
Even their coerced recruitment as paid informants against their parents was destined to result in knowingly falsified witness statements from the very beginning.
5. May I ask why?
Answer: In a word, torture. When you torture young people, as the FBI has tortured my sons and MX -- when you rape and traffic the loving sons of an FBI whistleblower, as the FBI has raped and tortured my loved ones -- when you engage in sovereignty violations, as the FBI has engaged in sovereignty violations against my children -- there is a breaking point for the vast majority of people.
6. And has there been a breaking point for your sons and MX?
Answer: Oh, yes. There has. Absent the sovereignty violations, they might have been able to hold on to themselves. But with the repeated, merciless violations of their personhood and their very identities, there really was no chance for them.
7. And are your sons and MX still being tortured for knowingly false witness statements against your husband and yourself?
Answer: Yes, they are.
8. What is the intent with these ongoing human rights violations?
Answer: The intent is first-degree murder. Once the FBI or FBI affiliates get hold of a particularly egregious false statement coerced under various forms of torture, they can receive dispensation from a judge -- not from the Supreme Court any longer, because my case is too well known -- but from a lesser judge granting the agency permission to implement plans of first-degree murder against me as a whistleblower who is entirely innocent of the crimes the agency is alleging.
9. And what would happen to funds awarded under your name through the auspices of the OIG Hotline, in that instance?
Answer: They would be privatized quite quickly.
10. By whom?
Answer: You're asking the right questions, certainly. It is highly appropriate to question who has misappropriated funds recently through false accusations extended about me. This will tell the public everything it needs to know.
11. The FBI appears to be alleging that it has arranged for an incident of street violence to take your life in Whistler, supposedly perpetrated by a young man with schizophrenia, someone who carries a viola case with him around town. This is a person you have seen on three occasions before. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, the FBI has alleged quite a detailed plan regarding this young man.
12. Has the FBI engaged in sovereignty violations against this person?
Answer: The agency alleges that it has done so extensively, yes.
13. Does the FBI use people whom it has labeled as mentally ill to engage in public violence?
Answer: Well, by way of answer, I will simply say that the agency has repeatedly threatened my older son in this very manner.
14. With certain types of sovereignty violations, is it impossible for the victims of the FBI's sovereignty breaches to decline the wrongful directives of the FBI or FBI affiliates?
Answer: Yes, and this is the heart of the problem. The sovereignty violations are so invasive and overwhelming that victims cannot effectively reference their own standards, ethics, conscience, morality and boundaries to say no.
15. Are you able to speak to the specifics of those sovereignty violations here?
Answer: I need to evaluate that question. For the time being, I will simply say that certain methods of torture can result in an inability on the victim's part to say no to the tormentor. The realities in the cases we're discussing are quite complex, however. And I am engaging in some deep thought regarding these issues of violations of human sovereignty in the manner in which the FBI is currently perpetrating these unconscionable crimes against the public at large. This is extremely serious territory, obviously, and it's implications for the future of mankind are far-reaching.
16. The FBI has continuously threatened to accuse your older son of terrorist activity, even while his agency has directed him to move packages from one location to another under threat of death from his handler Axxxxx. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
17. And the FBI has continuously threatened to imprison your younger son on charges of committing an act directed by the President in a foreign nation while failing to register as a foreign agent, all details of which were arranged at the directive of his FBI handler Txx Lxxxx. Is that correct as well?
Answer: Yes, it is.
18. Meanwhile, the FBI claims to have collected enough false reporting regarding other family members that the agency could imprison or kill them at any time. Is this what has been conveyed to you?
Answer: Yes.
19. Are all of these crimes on the part of the FBI, or a significant portion of them, included within reports now due to you from the OIG Hotline pursuant to your request for your evaluation of all materials regarding a potential political asylum application?
Answer: I believe so, yes.
20. And is this the reason the FBI appears to be so panicked at the prospect of your receiving full investigative reports and FOIA reports from the OIG Hotline?
Answer: Apparently so. Yet, I will observe that there is no safety for us without my receipt of those reports in their entirety.
I cannot know what nation might offer me safe harbor in light of the FBI's falsified law enforcement reporting against us unless I can see the investigative reports directly.
And the United States does not have dispensation to torture its most honorable citizens and then prevent them from seeking safety elsewhere.
21. Your animals have been extensively harmed by FBI affiliates at FBI directive as well, have they not?
Answer: They absolutely have.
22. Is there any commitment by the FBI to restore your family's health, your own health and your pets' health on an immediate basis?
Answer: I am still awaiting that commitment at this time.
23. What are the other current threats to your safety from the FBI?
Answer: Kidnapping, further sovereignty violations, Dxx deployments, blindness, deafness, lymphadenitis, dangerous parasitic infection, fungal infection, TB exposure, heart attack, cancer, dementia, traumatic brain injury, incontinence, sepsis due to kidney infection, thyroid disease, car bxxx threats, gas explosion threats, arson threats pertaining to hotel fire or fire at my properties, myriad other disabling illnesses and fatal environmental exposures. This list goes on and on.
24. What is the answer to this litany of horrors, because the FBI is demonstrating a commitment to lawlessness and corruption that could ruin the entire nation, isn't it?
Answer: The answer is to provide me with the reports in their entirety on an immediate basis. After that, we can engage in a prompt conversation about their contents vis a vis the wellbeing of the American public in the long term.
25. Should the DoD be involved in that discussion?
Answer: It most certainly should.
26. Should the FBI be involved?
Answer: Yes. But the FBI should not withhold restoration of our health in an attempt to extort certain concessions regarding the reports. That approach is a non-starter.
27. Should the Congress be involved?
Answer: Most definitely.
28. Others?
Answer: All stakeholders should be engaged in a confidential conversation regarding this matter on an immediate basis.
I do need the reports to make an evaluation of my options regarding my physical safety pursuant to a possible asylum application. My life is on the line.
But once I am in possession of them, I would fully expect there to be robust dialogue, yes.
29. Will you please keep us updated about your safety and wellbeing and that of your family members and pets?
Answer: I most certainly will.
30. Please take extra care of your safety and security at this time.
Answer: Thank you for your thoughtfulness. I will endeavor to do exactly that.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment