Auschwitz 2025, Thanks to the FBI

  1.  You have become emaciated because of the FBI's crimes against you to contaminate your food and water supply over a prolonged period of time.  Is that accurate?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

2.  Today is August 31, 2025, but the FBI has effectively starved you within your own home.

Answer:  Yes, that is the case.

3.  And this problem has persisted over this summer, despite the fact that you have moved your residence.  Because of these FBI crimes, you have continued to lose weight.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  Yes, it is fair to say.

4.  You are 5'9" or 5'10" at this time.  How much do you weigh?

Answer:  Perhaps one hundred and five pounds.  Perhaps one hundred pounds.

5.  Have you ever been this weight?

Answer:  As a twelve year old, I might have been this weight.

6.  What does your husband say about your emaciated appearance at this point?

Answer:  He has observed that I look like I am a concentration camp resident of Auschwitz.

7.  Do you feel he is being truthful?

Answer:  Oh, yes, he is being truthful.  The photographs of what the FBI has done to me are horrifying.

8.  Your bones are jutting from your skin in the above photograph.  Was this taken recently?

Answer:  My husband took that photograph this morning.

9.  The FBI has repeatedly conveyed to you a deadly parasitic illness that causes a protein synthesis deficiency.  Is that accurate?

Answer:  Yes, the type of Echinococcus multilocularis the FBI conveyed to my family causes extreme generalized muscle wasting of all muscles in the body, including the heart.  And it doesn't matter how much you eat or how you exercise, because sufferers will simply become emaciated no matter what.

10.  Is this an unusual type of Echinococcus multilocularis?  

Answer:  Yes, it's a highly dangerous variant of this normal illness, which is generally fatal even in its most common form.

11.  Your older son Graham was hospitalized at El Camino Hospital and also Stanford Hospital with Echinococcus multilocularis, wasn't he?

Answer:  Yes, he was.  He had lost fifty pounds and was experiencing severe abdominal pain.  And his gallbladder, when scanned, looked like this:

12.  Can you describe what we're seeing here?

Answer:  The dark areas are fluid filled cysts which contain the parasite, which is a type of worm that can colonize almost any organ in the body.  The cysts can grow to an enormous size and the illness acts identically to a rapidly growing cancer, interfering with normal physiological functions.  This is a painful and debilitating illness, make no mistake.

13.  And when your son Graham was hospitalized at El Camino Hospital, what did the doctors say?

Answer:  They indicated to him, at Tom Lyons' directive, that there was nothing wrong with him, and that he was making up his pain.

14.  Yet, they gave you this ultrasound scan of his gallbladder, which is grossly abnormal.

Answer:  Yes, they did.

15.  What did the radiologist say?

Answer:  Here's the report he wrote:

16.  Can you please comment on this radiology report?

Answer:  There are many irregularities here.  Many falsehoods.  But the most astonishing thing is the radiologists second "impression," which has been left completely blank.

17.  What is your interpretation of this "error"?

Answer:  That Tom Lyons and the radiologist had a serious disagreement about the duty of care, one that resulted in a complete redaction of the radiologist's most critical finding regarding my son's gallbladder.

18.  Was Tom Lyons trying to kill your son Graham?

Answer:  He was trying to kill my son Graham, as well as my son Duncan, together with my daughter-in-law, absolutely.  And he is not leaving out my husband or myself!  One month before Graham was hospitalized at El Camino Hospital, I received an ultrasound at O'Connor Hospital showing nine liver cysts.

19.  Nine?

Answer:  That is correct.

20.  And why had you requested the ultrasound?

Answer:  Unexplained and sudden pain in my liver.

21.  So, the FBI has dragged your family into being inmates of Auschwitz without ever sending you to formal concentration camps.

Answer:  Yes, it has.

22.  Is this reflective of a generalized policy of the agency?

Answer:  It is not legal at this time, due to the passage of concealed laws by the United States Congress, to discuss certain generalized policies of the FBI.

However, I can speak about what has happened to my family.

23.  Your beloved cat Oliver was killed by Echinococcus multilocularis conveyed to him by the FBI, was he not?

Answer:  Yes, he was.

24.  You paid for a necroscopy which conclusively proved that diagnosis upon aspirating his kidney cysts following his death.  Isn't that true?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

25.  Did Tom Lyons attempt to suppress those necroscopy results?

Answer:  Yes, he did.

26.  Returning to your older son, Graham, for a moment, the FBI appeared to suggest that it was going to wait until his illness was more advanced and then direct that he be misdiagnosed with late stage liver cancer.  Isn't this the case?

Answer:  Yes, it certainly is.

27.  Has the FBI caused other illnesses to your family through gratuitous and malevolent predation?

Answer:  Oh, yes.

28.  Hasn't the FBI suggested that it has ensured that your older son will return to the United States at the end of this weekend by intentionally conveying HIV to him through Dr. Davis Beckstead's Office during a recent dental appointment?

Answer:  The agency has appeared to suggest that it committed this crime, yes.

29.  Does the FBI's control over your sons and MX appear to be complete at this time?

Answer:  As far as I can tell, yes.  I do not see my sons exercising sovereignty at this time.

30.  Thinking about the emaciating effects of Echinococcus multilocularis, does it strike you as odd that some MAGA Republicans are now wearing "Camp Auschwitz" t-shirts?

Answer:  I am not able to comment about this phenomenon for the legal reasons I previously mentioned.  

31.  Is the FBI guilty of unusual cruelty, predation, defamation and attempted murder toward your family members and yourself?

Answer:  One hundred percent guilty.  Yes, it is.

32.  What does the agency now need to do to atone?

Answer:  It needs to get a lawyer on the phone immediately.

33.  Do you feel outrage over the FBI's crimes in turning your beloved family members into concentration camp victims?

Answer:  Outrage is an appropriate word.  And that is not to say that I approve of anger for anger's sake.  But the FBI is demonstrating sadistic and predatory behaviors that we would consider to be inhuman and unacceptable to any civilized society.

34.  Thank you for having the courage to illuminate the agency's crimes toward your family in this one area this afternoon.  I must assume there are many others.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.  And yes, there are many, many other sets of crimes the FBI has committed against us, all unacceptable, most of them equally or more inhuman than those depicted here.

35.  Please keep us apprised of your health and that of your family members under these appalling circumstances caused by the FBI.

Answer:  I certainly will.

Lane MacWilliams

Communications Update, August 31, 2025

 

A Dispatch from the Front Lines of Whistler, BC

 -1. What is the current status of your background checks? 

 Answer: They're in progress, because I think the company involved realized they could not legally refuse to assist me. At the same time, it is clear that there is ongoing communication between the company and the FBI regarding the criminal records checks. 

 2. How can you tell that this communication is taking place? 

 Answer: The Falmouth Police Department seems under extreme stress given my records requests. They say they cannot locate any records about me at all, and when I supply them with case numbers regarding prior false reports from the FBI, my emails are promptly deleted. 

 Also, my requests for fingerprinting checks are not being encouraged or facilitated at all. I am being told that I could mail a fingerprint card to the FBI for processing, but not that the local RCMP in Canada could run the check online immediately, which of course they can. 

 3. Why do you think no one wants you to request the fingerprint check immediately? 

 Answer: Because I think the FBI has a false charge sitting out there that would bring up a wrongful match with my fingerprints. And I think the FBI and local law enforcement would be in a horrific bind if that match were verified in the short term. 

 4. Why? 

 Answer: Because no one is willing to admit that the FBI has engaged in egregiously falsified law enforcement reporting in this case. The agency would rather murder my whole family than admit this wrongdoing, from which they have profiteered extensively, I might add. And, in fact, a violent approach still appears to be the agency's preferred way of "solving" all of its self-created problems. 

 5. Is your blog being suppressed at this time? 

 Answer: It appears to be, though the specifics are difficult to verify. 

 6. Meanwhile, your family members have come under heightened attack by the FBI, with your husband being the victim of the FBI's tampering with your blog, and your sons and MX experiencing physical attack. 

 Answer: That is correct. 

 7. What is the agency trying to accomplish through this aggression? 

 Answer: It seems that the agency would like to silence me for a long enough period of time to wipe the record of their false reporting clean. They appear to be approaching a judicial process to keep false reporting concealed from members of the public who request criminal record checks. 

 8. This has never come up before? 

 Answer: If you are a law-abiding person, you are never going to seek to run a criminal record check on yourself. It certainly never occurred to me! You might submit a Freedom of Information Act request. But not a criminal record check for which you might need to pay thousands of dollars even while you know you are perfectly honorable. Good people have confidence in their character and integrity, and this is never going to seem like a logical step for the law-abiding American. 

 9. What about the FBI's claims of DNA evidence implicating you or your loved ones of Pxxxxxx Program crimes the agency itself is reported to have directed and overseen? 

 Answer: I can easily discuss the FBI's means of falsifying DNA "evidence," but I'm fairly sure the FBI considers that information confidential. My concern is regarding the number of people the FBI has wrongfully convicted using these techniques. I am very concerned about racial profiling in this context, in addition to political targeting, and other forms of discrimination. If the FBI can accuse anyone of the most heinous crimes by using these methods, then we have entered into totalitarian territory from which retreat will be exceptionally difficult. 

 10. Are the lives of the FBI's South Bay Chief of Station, Txx Lxxxx, and his close associate, Bxxxxxx Pxxx, on the line over this case? 

 Answer: I would be shocked if they weren't. The FBI doesn't want the Pxxxxxx Program to be exposed, and the agency would certainly be willing to murder their own in order to conceal it from the public view. 

 11. Aren't these man responsible for setting up these false accusations against your family members or you yourself over a period of years? 

 Answer: I have not ascertained the FBI's actions in this case, so I simply cannot conjecture over questions of responsibility. I can say that the FBI appears to suggest that these two men have been centrally involved, yes. 

 12. What should happen at this point? 

 Answer: I should receive full reports, and the FBI should engage in dialogue with me through an attorney. In this manner, this case, which has caused so much suffering to my family, could be assessed for its potential to assist with the long term defense of human rights in the United States, and, in fact, around the world. 

 13. Isn't the problem that the FBI is trying to take your life instead of face even that confidential degree of accountability? 

 Answer: Yes, it is. 

 14. Is President Trump authorizing the agency to aggress against all of your family members at this time? 

 Answer: Honestly, the agency seems out of control. Agency personnel seem to indicate that the FBI has made the disastrous decision to target my whole family in the immediate term in order to avoid accountability. And in this context the agency keeps referring to false "espionage" allegations, false allegations of capital crimes, forced job loss, arson, staged car accidents, the usual endless list from these people. 

 15. How can you best respond? 

 Answer: I'm in the process of determining my next steps. But we need to bring transparency to this situation in order to ensure that no one else connected to this case is hurt, and I include Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx in that perspective. The agency should not be committing first degree murder to silence me or to silence their own employees and affiliates. Any such attempt would likely be ruinous. So, as much as the FBI is unaccustomed to being caught, it has been caught in this particular instance, and it needs to acknowledge that fact to me, at least privately. 

 16. If the FBI does not acknowledge its culpability in this matter, what is the likelihood that the agency will cease targeting your family and yourself? 

 Answer: It's zero. Less than zero. Torture of my family has been astonishingly profitable for the FBI, by all accounts, and they are not prepared to give that up. 

 17. So, you need to address this situation using the best of your own judgement, wisdom and insight. 

 Answer: Yes, I do. 

 18. Will you please keep us informed about what happens next?

 Answer: Of course, I will. However, I will say that, if the FBI were to contact me through an attorney, I would honor a request for confidentiality regarding those discussions. 

 19. Thank you for taking the time to update us regarding these extraordinary events. 

 Answer: You are quite welcome.

 Lane MacWilliams

Communications Update, August 28, 2025

 

A Call for President Trump to Reverse Standing Orders of Assassination Toward a Highly Honorable American

 OIG Hotline, for your full knowledge, the information I provided to the IRCC yesterday consisted of a copy of an email asking for a delayed interview, a declaration of amended application, my birth certificate order, and my documents showing that the link to upload documents in my IRCC account is still not working, in addition to a color copy of my passport and driver's license.

When I attempted to visit Canada's IRCC myself yesterday, I was met with an assassination threat from the FBI.

Good people, I drove past the building, and my assessment was that the threats were genuine.  Police were everywhere, there was a staged altercation with a homeless person unfolding on the street, and there were at least ten plainclothes security personnel on the block.

I kept on driving.

I believe it is appropriate for the IRCC to postpone my interview by six weeks or more while I gather information pertaining to my case, including my background checks.

During that information gathering, it would be appropriate for attorney outreach to occur so that FBI malfeasance can be discussed in detail.

This is an important case, with profound implications for the long term human rights of all.

I want to receive the respectful and honorable engagement from our government that is required given the astonishing stakes involved.

I will not be satisfied with the FBI's attempt to conceal its false claims regarding my husband and myself, nor with attempts to conceal its torture of my children.

Instead, I want access to the truth of the FBI's malfeasance in this matter, and I want it right away.

Only in this manner can the FBI be forced into a lawful discussion about its conduct toward my family and its far-reaching implications regarding the long term sovereignty of our nation and our people.

I hasten to add that I well understand that not all FBI programs can be discussed publicly, which is the reason I have suggested attorney dialogue regarding this matter.

The fact that my family has continued to suffer egregious harm, and threats of harm, while I have repeatedly requested honorable and confidential engagement represents a clear disservice to the public trust.

We need to engage in these issues with abundant honor and integrity, not respond to them with attempts to assassinate those who are standing up for the long term sovereignty of all.

I call on President Trump to reverse standing orders specifying my harm and the harm of my loved ones and instead act ethically and worthily in allowing the postponement of my IRCC interview, in allowing the full provision of documents revealing the FBI's misconduct in this matter, and in prompting attorney outreach to discuss the critical issues for the future brought to the fore by my case.

Thank you for allowing me to document these deeply serious concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Delivery to IRCC, August 26, 2025

 

When the FBI Criminally Obstructs a Background Check That Will Prove Its Misconduct Conclusively

 OIG Hotline, this constitutes my petition for the removal of the ban on all internet services from my cell phone and computer.

This obstruction, based on entirely false evidence which I have not had the opportunity to see, is placing my life at risk, and it needs to be withdrawn immediately.

Secondly, the FBI has apparently been in direct communication with CSI in directing this company to delay, and then decline, my background check until the FBI can perpetrate further harm.

Information that should have been available to me within 24 hours will not be -- thus materially endangering my life and the lives of my loved ones.  This delay has been verified this morning by alleged CSI staff member "Terry," who refused to place Kori on the phone.

I have a right to run a background check on the FBI's false claims regarding me, and I have a right to that information now, not later.

The FBI is attempting to buy time in which to take my life, discredit my case, and misappropriate funds awarded to the FBI's victims in my name.

Meanwhile, I appear to have caught the agency red-handed in an appalling attempt -- years long in the making, allegedly -- to falsely implicate me or my loved ones of Pxxxxxx Program crimes or other criminal activity.

The agency is now caught in a predicament of its own corruption.

I have a right to run a background check on the FBI's false claims against me, even while the FBI wants to keep its crimes a secret from the public.

FOIA and other information requests can be wrongfully redacted or denied.  A criminal background check cannot.

So, the FBI is now caught in a plan of yet further harm, harassment, intimidation and violence toward my family.

To say that this agency is violating my human rights is the understatement of the millenium.

Who authorized this criminal predation?

What are they intending?

That I will waltz into an IRCC interview on Thursday morning and have my passport seized while I experience wrongful arrest?  That my application will be denied for lack of evidence, even while these FBI criminals are withholding it?

Would that make an entertaining video update to their online feed regarding my case?

Or are they really pushing for the higher ratings with a video or first degree murder against my loved ones, and me alongside them?

Will we merit a vague reference on an FBI International episode?

Is that a worthy epitaph?

Good people, I am endeavoring to ensure that our national sovereignty and individual freedoms survive in the long term.

The manner in which these men are betraying our country and our people constitutes a national disgrace.

I respectfully request that the OIG Hotline direct the FBI to allow my thorough background check through CSI to proceed immediately.

I further request that the FBI be directed to postpone my IRCC interview for six weeks or more, as originally agreed by IRCC personnel on August 20, 2025.

Beyond this, I would suggest that a lawyer reach out to me immediately to discuss the FBI's serious crimes against my family.

To wait further will be to ensure agency exposure regarding egregious FBI misconduct that the public will find as inexcusable as I do.

Thank you for your vigorous advocacy regarding these pressing concerns.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*At this particular time, none of the information pertaining to my case should be utilized by the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, or any other entity, office, institution or individual for the assessment of settlements or penalties against the FBI or FBI affiliates for knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting or its associated harms against me or against my loved ones.

Communications Update, August 25, 2025

 

Background Screening Request of CSI

 OIG Hotline, today, I ordered a background check within both the United States and Canada from a company called CSI Background Screening.  I further requested information pertaining to France, Portugal and Zambia, to which I have traveled with my husband in recent years.

CSI's employee Kori has guaranteed to me that CSI will maintain my privacy by refusing to disseminate to third parties any and all defamatory information regarding me.

I have explained my whistleblower role regarding FBI malfeasance in my case, and CSI has committed to me that they will fully protect my privacy and security.

This conversation was fully documented.

I will be in communication with your Office with regard to any and all information provided to me regarding this request.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Communications Update, August 24, 2025

 OIG Hotline, please note that the following email was sent to your Office at 9:28 PM on August 24, 2025, despite the incorrect date/time stamp, which appears to reflect tampering by a third party.

This is a valid communication to your Office, and should be regarded as such if needed in my defense.

Thank you for your ongoing efforts regarding this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Documentation of Information Requests, August 23, 2025

OIG Hotline, my information requests of the Falmouth Police Department, the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office, and the British Columbia RCMP, sent to your email address today, August 23, 2025 at 3:56 PM, 4:25 PM and 4:20 PM, respectively, cover all information regarding me that is currently within these Office's possession or accessible by them.  In addition, copies of these communications will be sent to the Canadian Human Rights Commission and Ambassador Hillman.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Recent Communications Through Email, August 22, 2025

 

Recent Communications Through Email

 

Important Restrictions at This Time

 

OIG Hotline, at this particular time, none of the information within my communications should be utilized by the OIG Hotline of the U.S. DOJ, or any other entity, office, institution or individual for the assessment of settlements or penalties against the FBI or FBI affiliates for knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting or its associated harms against me or against my loved ones.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Apparent Interference with Asylum Application

 OIG Hotline, it seems clear that there is a desire for me not to advance my application for political asylum in Canada, and to receive reports in support of that application, given that my Notice to Return for Interview has a blank date, time and location, as seen in the attached screenshot, below.

Am I to be allowed safe harbor anywhere?

This appears to represent clearly illegal obstruction of my application, and it is not accompanied in time by any outreach whatsoever pertaining to my case.

This is alarming, in that, if I miss a scheduled interview, my application can be summarily canceled.

I have been deprived of legal advocacy regarding my application for asylum, so I need to navigate this process on my own, without any assurance of equitable or reasonable treatment.

If my asylum application is rejected due to a missed interview, presumably, the Trump Administration could take my life at will based on knowingly false accusations, whether in Canada or elsewhere.  So, this is a concerning matter, to be sure.

Due to the seriousness of this situation, I am posting this documentation on my blog, as well as providing it to your Office via email.

Most sincerely, 

Lane MacWilliams

Formal Request for Temporary Suspension of Penalty Phases Within OIG Hotline Agreement on My Behalf

 OIG Hotline, I documented for myself several weeks ago that if I were not supported in attending my son's wedding safely, there would be major changes in my efforts through your Office.

I have grown deeply concerned that there have been those who are stealing funds intended for the FBI's victims through accounts bearing my name under DOJ auspices.  It seems possible that, rather than discourage falsified law enforcement reporting against me, your original settlement with the FBI (which I have not had the privilege of seeing, I must point out) must have specified penalty phases that corrupt members of our government, including Tom Lyons and even the highest elected officials, are finding quite lucrative.

It seems that I may alternately be defamed with knowingly false accusations by the FBI and its affiliates, and exonerated daily with my own protestations of my innocence, in a process that has generated trillions in "privatized" funds for the enemies of human sovereignty, stolen from the American people through the national treasury.

This represents a terrible distortion of my case, and one that I never intended.

Accordingly, I hereby formally request a temporary suspension of the original settlement agreement clauses pertaining to penalty phases toward the FBI and its affiliates.  

I ask that no additional funds be awarded in my case until and unless I receive the provision of reports regarding my case, and accompanying outreach to discuss its contents.

At that point, I will request that penalty clauses of the original settlement agreement be reinstated, with assurances that that process cannot be turned against the American people.

During this time, while I am waiting for the provision of reports and accompanying outreach, I would respectfully request that malfeasance from the FBI and its affiliates result in criminal charges against FBI and FBI-affiliate perpetrators. (The one caveat here is that my sons and MX have lost their sovereignty entirely, so they cannot defend themselves against wrongful directives from their handlers.  Under such circumstances, they cannot be held liable for handler-directed actions -- and they should be exonerated in all regards pertaining to past coercion.  The necessary status of my sons and MX should be immediate honorable discharge from any and all government programs, in order to ensure that coercive control can no longer be exercised against them, or any of my family members, including myself.  I do believe I possess full sovereignty at this time, but I am endeavoring to monitor possible threats to my sovereignty rigorously.)

My conduct will remain honorable and lawful in every regard unless I notify you otherwise.  This may be relied upon, certainly.

But the money needs to stop flowing in order to insist that I receive appropriate outreach regarding my case.

So, I ask for your immediate and determined help in this regard.

Clearly, I would request that all access to these funds through claims by anyone other than me be strictly prohibited.  

Thank you for your support regarding this critical matter, so central to the question of whether human sovereignty can be rescued in the long term.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

A White Wedding, Please

 OIG Hotline, the FBI appears to suggest that my older son has been asked to extend harm by placing an unknown substance within exposed drinks, and further, that others have been asked to extend this identical harm to him.  Beyond this, there is the suggestion that my younger son has been asked to target my husband in an identical manner.

The FBI appears to suggest that a contagious and fatal illness of some kind has been conveyed to both of my sons, and potentially MX as well, and that medical care will be withheld from them unless they comply with their agencies' demands.

The parents of the bride are within the grips of the FBI because their younger daughter developed an aggressive cancer due to high radiation exposures perpetrated by the agency.  She now has an infant, and she and her husband are extremely vulnerable to the FBI's predations.  So, the bride's whole family has been co-opted, alarmingly.

Clearly, it appears that the FBI imagined turning my son's and MX's celebration today into the Game of Thrones' "Red Wedding" episode, in which everyone is harmed through malevolent predation.

A significant number of the groomsmen have been forcibly recruited into the Pxxxxxx Program, much to this group's diminishment.

My defense of my son's and MX's celebration today is the public exposure of these allegations.

I have asked that Tom Lyons and his close associates be excluded from the wedding, and I have requested that my family members and the wedding party usher them out of the building if they should have the temerity to appear.

Thank you for allowing me to document these remarkable allegations for your Office.

We would wish that they represented a delusional fantasy of harm, but I have come to learn that Tom Lyons takes great pleasure in nurturing delusional fantasies of harm.

So, those who are sane among us must unfortunately take these astonishing allegations seriously.

Certainly, I ought to have been able to attend my son's and MX's wedding in safety and to celebrate with them without fear for my family's security or my own.  The fact that this was not prioritized represents a great loss for our family, and one that is gratuitous in its cruelty.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Post in Progress

 

Signed statement sent to oig.hotline@usdoj.gov at 2:24 PM on August 13, 2024

Holding Wayward Men to Account

 OIG Hotline, please see the following communications I sent to your Office, included below.

Please note that two important emails were sent to your Office's attention at 5:10 PM and 5:31 PM this afternoon.

I am now receiving death threats, ostensibly from the Pxxxxxx Program, regarding revelations in the 5:10 PM communication.

Apparently, Txx Lxxxx is worried about being indicted due to his actions relating to both emails to your Office.

He certainly appears to have earned that concern.

Specifically, it appears that false claims Mr. Lxxxx extended to court in both the United States and Canada have prevented me from obtaining access to information pursuant to my requests for documentation from your Office and the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

Now, it appears that the Pxxxxxx Program is threatening to take my life and/or my family members' lives as the result of a break in on Thursday night, August 14, 2025.

Bxxxxxx Pxxx appears to have directed this plan as a result of fears of charges of treason which the government is said to be considering against him.

It is also possible that Mr. Pxxx will be found culpable of alleged Pxxxxxx Program crimes at one or more of my properties, according to FBI allegations.

So, his fear may be driving this exacerbated aggression as well.

This is the reason why I have suggested provision of reports to me on an urgent basis, with sealed, certified contents to be signed for by me directly.

Please provide this documentation as rapidly as possible, with accompanying tracking numbers pertaining to delivery, and associated outreach to discuss the contents the reports.

Thank you for holding these wayward men to account regarding these most serious false allegations.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Evening of August 10, 2025

 

OIG Hotline, having finished walking my dogs for the evening, I have walked to the Whistler Fairmont in order to communicate with your Office regarding the honor and lawfulness of all interactions.

When I walked Birdie, we did not meet anyone this evening, because I took a different route than normal.

Following this, I walked Poppy along the same path.  She met a dog named Puka, all black, whose owners seemed completely charmed by Poppy's excellent manners. Puka, by contrast, snarled and snapped on one occasion, with no precipitating incident, prompting our departure.  Puka's mom photographed Poppy greeting Puka sweetly, so I'm certain she will file a witness statement.  In general, dog owners do not photograph one another's dogs without permission to do so -- a favor I would have withheld.

After we left, a stranger on the Village Stroll commented on how sweet and loving Poppy is, and I readily agreed.

Later on our walk, a one-year-old, toddling with his mother on the left side of the path, walked past Poppy, who lay down to show submission and concern.  When the toddler was close by, she stood up to say hello, though the mother did not stop.  I explained that Poppy is very friendly to children, and the mother seemed delighted.

On the path home, an off-leash dog named Timber ran up to Poppy, who happily greeted him.  Timber's mom quickly leashed him and gave affection to Poppy, who was asking for belly rubs.  This woman, too, was extremely complimentary, repeatedly calling Poppy a "sweetheart," a judgement with which I readily agreed.

We met no one else on the way home, but once in the hotel suite, I received an apparent threat of false reporting regarding my walk with Poppy.  This puppy is an absolute sweetheart, submissive, affectionate, and trusting to everyone she meets.  She exhibits no aggression whatsoever.

Following my return to the hotel suite, I walked to Shoppers Drug Mart, where I purchased dix Perrier water, one box of ginger green tea, and one bag of cheddar popcorn.  The cashier was absent and a sign was in place directing customers to utilize self-checkout, which I subsequently did.  However, before leaving the store, I notice that the cashier had reappeared.  Accordingly, I asked her to verify the accuracy of my receipt, which she did.  The risk in this setting seemed to me to be an AI-generated film suggesting shoplifting a few hours hence.  Accordingly, I engaged with the cashier honorably prior to leaving the store.

After this, I walked to the Fairmont, giving one of my waters to a young man with a sign asking for drinks or contributions along the path.

Following this documentation, I will walk home, as it is still light outside.

Please be apprised that I have provided this communication to your Office via email as well.  Although the date/time stamp on the Fairmont's desktop computer is false, it is August 10, 2025, and I have provided your Office with documentation allowing you to update communications for several important specified reasons.  Accordingly, your Office should be adequately supported in rendering this document valid.

This is to confirm that all of my conduct, activities,  communications, interactions, internet access, phone calls, phone use, and intentions have been and continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form.

I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully and categorically false.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Most sincerely, 

Lane MacWilliams

Documentation for the OIG Hotline on August 10, 2025

 OIG Hotline, for the sake of redundancy, I am including screenshots herewith of my gmail documentation for your Office today, August 10, 2025.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Signed Statement of Lane MacWilliams, August 10, 2025

OIG Hotline, please be apprised that my signature appears to be deleted within my gmail account, lanemacwilliams@gmail.com, due to third-party tampering at this time.

As a result, I am endeavoring to place documentation for your Office on my blog at this time.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

*********************************************************************************

 This is to confirm that all of my activities, communications, conduct, intentions, subscriptions, purchases, internet access, phone use, phone calls, and viewing of videos/films on any platform have been and continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape and form.  Furthermore, this is to confirm that my husband and I are both peaceable people, committed to the rule of law and honorable engagement with others at all times.  We have always endeavored to help and support all those we encounter, and have assiduously and conscientiously avoided causing harm to anyone.  My husband and I have exercised the highest ethics and standards of conduct in our professional lives, as well as our personal lives.

I hereby confirm that I have had only one lifetime intimate partner, that of my husband of thirty-five years.

I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully, and categorically false.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and understanding.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

Three Purposes of This Revised Authorization

 OIG Hotline, please note that all dates appearing below are August 9, 2025.  My previous "Revised Authorization" demonstrates tampering with dates.  Accordingly, I am endeavoring to clarify all current documentation for the OIG Hotline's use.

There are three purposes of this revised authorization:

1.  to assist the OIG Hotline or its designees in defending me, or my family members, from false, defamatory, wrongful or unjust accusations by the FBI or its affiliates.

2.  to update all documentation that assists the OIG Hotline or its designee, such as Ambassador Hillman, in providing me with all materials in the possession of the OIG Hotline relating to my case.

3.  to assist the OIG Hotline or its designees in advocating for the immediate honorable discharge of my sons and MX from any all government programs and affiliations, vacating any and all "convictions" connected to their handers', agencies', or agencies' affiliates' directives, and further, to advocate for the immediate and permanent removal of all implanted communications devices for my sons and MX, and, in addition, to ensure that my sons and MX will no longer have handlers, nor communications with agency personnel, save for dialogue with your Office regarding health and safety concerns, and beyond this, to remove my husband, my sons, MX, our friends, and my pets from all lists of targeted harassment, defamation, false reporting and harm.  Of course, I would also ask that documents be updated to assist the OIG Hotline in ensuring that I myself will suffer no further defamation or harm.

This document has no other purpose than those listed above.

I hope this helps to clarify my intent.  I regret that I do not have the ability to consult with an attorney regarding this matter, so it is not possible for me to be appropriately protected under the law.  Nor do I know what false, defamatory, wrongful or unjust accusations may be extended by others regarding my family members or myself.

It does seem as though the FBI has consistently focused on false accusations of mental illness and promiscuity in the past, both rather hackneyed and misogynistic tropes.  So, I assume these pathways of false reporting are well-worn by the agency.

Nonetheless, they remain entirely untrue.  My psychological resilience and stability remain admirable and sound, and I continue to have had only one intimate partner over my lifetime, that of my husband of 35 years.

With regard to other possible accusations, our Constitution means that Americans should not behaving to guess about the nature of false charges invented by malevolent security agencies.

While I recognize the difficult nature of the FBI's mission and objectives, I simply do not believe that knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting against my family has assisted the society, the agency, the nation, or my family.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.

Most sincerely,

 Lane MacWilliams

Formal Request for All Information in OIG Hotline's Possession Relating to My Case

 OIG Hotline, please be apprised that I spent today preparing and submitting my application as a refugee protection claimant within Canada.  Due to increasing threats to my personal safety, that of my family members, friends and pets, it seemed that it was necessary to take this additional step at this time.  As I mentioned, I view the United States as my home, and I view funds awarded to me through your auspices as funds I intend to dedicate to the long term freedoms of American citizens, with my active participation.  

In order to support my application, I respectfully request that all information pursuant to investigative materials in your Office's possession be conveyed to me at the earliest possible time.  In this way, I can ensure that selected information is available for my initial interview.

Thank you very much for your support regarding this critical matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

The FBI's Obstruction of Justice Through the CHRC

 1.  Was the FBI allowed to extend knowingly false accusations pertaining to a knowingly false investigation to the Canadian Human Rights Commission?

Answer:  It appears so.

2.  Who is responsible?

Answer:  The worst of the perpetrators in this instance?  Bxxxxxx Pxxx, Txx Lxxxx, President Trump.  I'm sure there are others, but those are the worst abusers of the public trust in this case.

3.  What renders these men so indelibly unworthy?

Answer:  They're liars, all of them.  Inveterate and unrepentant liars, defamers, and slanderers.

4.  And what is the result of lies that are institutionally generated, with the help of AI, and the dedication of men with no ethics and no restraint?

Answer:  Historically?  Mass murder.  That's the reason the Anti-defamation League was formed.  It was seen that throughout history, false reporting and intentional defamation was a prelude, accompaniment, and postlude to mass murder.

I won't speak about current programs in this context, because it's no longer lawful to do so.

5.  Can you be more specific?

Answer:  Congress allegedly passed a concealed law affecting the American people which does not allow commentary on the objectives of certain current programs of the FBI and its affiliates.

6.  And what will happen to people who break that unknown law?

Answer:  Again, I would not comment.  But we can certainly express concern for those honorable Americans who might believe they were at liberty to exercise freedom of speech on this subject.

7.  Was an account bearing your name within the Department of Justice recently emptied by President Trump?

Answer:  The FBI alleges so, yes.

8.  The FBI seemed to suggest that you should request reinstatement of those funds.  Was that so that President Trump could raid those coffers again through newly false accusations against you?

Answer:  I have no doubt.  Yes, it seems these crimes are being repeated by the Executive Branch, and further, it seems there is the intention that they should continue.

9.  Are these dollar amounts large enough to be translating to increasing food and energy prices for the American consumer?

Answer:  Yes.  They will ultimately lead to mass inflation, which is the current unstated policy.  The dollar will be radically devalued for the simple reason that the United States is massively over-indebted.

10.  What will happen to the American consumer?

Answer:  Terrible things.  It's just going to be extremely difficult for American citizens, and, indeed, for everyone who is affected by the American economy around the world.

11.  Meanwhile, President Trump has allegedly approved the placement of unknown "evidence" of capital crimes on your properties in Woods Hole, Massachusetts and Portola Valley, California with the express intention of repeatedly raiding an account bearing your name -- all of this through the auspices of the FBI's Pxxxxxx Program.  Is that the case?

Answer:  The FBI appears to suggest this, yes.

12.  On the basis of those false accusations, could President Trump have you wrongfully arrested or killed?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  He's already tried it.  I filed my complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission in an effort to force him to stop the aggression.

13.  And in response, he simply had the FBI extend false claims to the CHRC?

Answer:  That appears to be the case.

14.  So a complaint about false claims was obstructed by false claims from the same perpetrators?

Answer:  That is correct.

15.  How does it feel to have had your high character and integrity harnessed to the profiteering from torture of the innocent by men with no moral integrity at all?

Answer:  Horrific.  Nightmare-ish.  The worst distortion of advocacy for the human rights of Americans imaginable.

16.  Does President Trump feel immune from the judgement of history?

Answer:  I think so, yes.  He feels that he can control the flow of information to the extent that he can murder whomever he wants, obstruct the emails of whomever he wants, rewrite history in whatever manner he wants.  All of it represents the most astonishing abuses of power our nation, and indeed the world, has ever seen.

17.  What would you like Americans to know about the corruption of the FBI if you could convey the information?

Answer:  I think it would help Americans to know that their tax dollars are funding propaganda departments within the FBI that are directed domestically, against Americans themselves.  This pertains to the news and the way Americans hear news reporting surrounding almost all world events, all politics, all developments of consequence.  This might encourage them to look past the headlines, to see past the usual tropes, and to start to ask questions.

Fundamentally, the FBI is lying to Americans, and it is lying to them institutionally, with intent, and over a broad range of subjects.

So, the American people would benefit from understanding that foundational fact, and from beginning to wonder why that might be the case.

18.  Would the American people be furious with the Executive Branch if they understood the predatory conduct that has been manifested through your case alone?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Outraged.  And this sentiment would be justified entirely.

19.  One question for you with regard to the Pxxxxxx Program crimes the President authorized as connected to your properties:  who actually committed those crimes?  Was it Bxxxxxx Pxxx?

Answer:  I don't have that information, certainly, but I'm sure Bxxxxxx Pxxx was directly involved in arranging their perpetration.

20.  Why do you say that?

Answer:  His colleagues describe him as a known serial killer who is obsessed with ideas relating to causing harm to my family members and myself.

21.  And he suffers from psychosis?

Answer:  Yes.  According to the FBI, he had a psychotic break for which he was hospitalized in the autumn of 2017.  He still allegedly hears "voices" ordering his conduct through "command hallucinations."

22. Is this the person who should be setting national policy?

Answer:  You are asking the right question, certainly.

23.  Is Bxxxxxx Pxxx the reported Russian-affiliated mob boss who is "pulling the strings" of the Presidency?

Answer:  He describes himself this way, apparently.  He referred to President Biden as a "marionette," and his view of President Trump appears identical.

24.  Does America realize that a self-described psychotic serial killer is in charge of critical aspects of national policy at this time?

Answer:  They have no idea whatsoever.

25.  What would the American people have to say about President Trump, Bxxxxxx Pxxx and Txx Lxxxx if they knew they had ordered the forced conscription of both of your sons into the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program and proceeded to wrongfully direct them, under threat of death?

Answer:  Well, I think the American people would see these men for what they are, which is failed human beings, devoid of conscience, an ethical compass or a moral framework that most of us view as defining of our humanity.  I think the American public would identify them as torturers, abusers, defamers, and murderers.  And I think the American public would be correct.

26.  What is your response to this terrible distortion of your advocacy for Americans' long term human rights?

Answer:  I find it abysmal.  It represents the worst of avarice, deceit and predation among some of the most powerful men in the country.  And I hope history remembers them for their unconscionable self-dealing and their gratuitous and unforgivable harm of innocents.

27.  You are being threatened with death daily for speaking about this issue.  Isn't that true?

Answer:  I'm going to be getting louder about this issue until my concerns are addressed honorably and respectfully.  

28.  That hasn't happened yet.

Answer:  No, it has not.

29.  Do you feel that President Trump has betrayed the nation with regard to the conduct you are describing here?

Answer:  He has betrayed the nation, and he has betrayed the human race, both.

30.  What are the odds that Bxxxxxx Pxxx will be held accountable for the murders he has committed?

Answer:  You know, I think ultimately people could take out billboards advertising the crimes of the men mentioned here, and I think that accountability will occur, despite their attempts to control all public discourse on this subject.  The truth contains a remarkable power, and the American people will ultimately have access to it, despite these lamentable totalitarian abuses.

31.  Realistically, will the American people have the opportunity to regain their rights after this raiding of the National Treasury?

Answer: Bxxxxxx Pxxx is now bragging about being a trillionaire because of these abuses, so the odds are quite low, in truth.  There will be many factors that prevent the American people, and others, from enjoying free speech, free thought, and other fundamental Constitutional rights in the future, but none more significant that the wrongful enrichment of a predator like Bxxxxxx Pxxx.  And there are many reasons why this is so.  But the broad-based diminishment of the human race will be the inevitable result.

32.  When President Trump keeps referring to the current time as The Golden Age of America, is he really referring to his historic theft of public funds and his privatization of those monies for his own personal benefit?

Answer:  There can be no question about this.  Yes, for President Trump, Bxxxxxx Pxxx, Txx Lxxxx and their corrupt cohort, it is a "golden age."  Not for others.  And, as I said, the results for human freedoms will be no less than disastrous.  So, this is a terrible development for humanity, and it's not one from which we will recover.

33.  I'm sorry to hear this disheartening update.

Answer:  I'm sorry to give it.  But it's the truth, and it's one we all need to hear.

34.  Please keep us updated on your wellbeing and that of your family members.

Answer:  Thank you for your concern for us.  I certainly will.

Lane MacWilliams