1. Is it disqualifying of the Nobel Peace Prize for a President of the United States to attempt to frame and/or take the life of a highly honorable American FBI whistleblower and her family members in order for him to "privatize" funds awarded in her name through the OIG Hotline of the U.S. Department of Justice?
Answer: First degree murder attempts by a sitting President in the name of profiteering from the torture of the innocent? Yes, I think that's likely disqualifying of Nobel Peace Prize candidacy.
2. Has the OIG Hotline proven that the President wrongfully authorized the Pxxxxxx Program to make a direct attempt on your life on the evening of July 19, 2025 in Whistler, British Columbia?
Answer: I believe they have, yes.
3. So, if the Nobel Committee were to request your reports from the OIG Hotline, would they be in receipt of proof that the sitting President of the United States had committed serious crimes against your family and against the American public as a whole?
Answer: I believe so, yes.
4. Does the Nobel Committee know where to find that information?
Answer: They probably have no idea at the current time.
5. It has been suggested to you that President Trump's attempts to murder your family members and you yourself might be likened to "political opponents on a debate stage."
Answer: In my experience, a lawful political debate in which there is policy disagreement has nothing to do with first degree murder by an elected or would-be-elected official for profit. Further, the rape and trafficking of my children does not represent civil disagreement between "a team of rivals." Rather, it represents the most brutal form of torture and repression known to human society anywhere on the planet.
6. What about the Trump administration's apparent threats to frame you or your family members of capital crimes if you do not allow him to steal public funds from awards extended in your name through the OIG Hotline?
Answer: That's a very regrettable approach, and I highly doubt it's one of which the American public would approve.
7. Any comment on the FBI's assertions that you are a Communist?
Answer: I have a horror of Communism, and so does my husband. Democrats are not Communists, and I think the label is an extremely dangerous and wrongful justification for harm and aggression by our trusted law enforcement agencies at the federal level.
8. What about the apparent threats of the Trump administration to have you shot through sniper action, killed through transmission of acute illness, murdered through street crime or wrongful arrest? And haven't you received threats pertaining to your family members regarding all of these concerns as well?
Answer: Again, I don't think further crimes toward me or further crimes toward my family members would cast President Trump in a favorable light in the public's view.
9. What about the threats of the Trump administration to cause you and your family members broad defamation if you fail to allow him to steal funds awarded in your name through the OIG Hotline?
Answer: How would history reflect on such a man? I don't think that line of conduct is defensible.
10. What is the appropriate manner in which the Trump administration can address the appalling crimes the FBI has committed against you and against your family members?
Answer: Outreach from a real person who is authorized to apologize on behalf of the government represents a necessary first step.
11. In the absence of that apology, should the Nobel Prize Committee have full access to the specific aspects of your reports that reflect malfeasance on the part of President Trump?
Answer: In the absence of that apology, together with resolution of my concerns regarding this matter, they certainly should.
12. Thank you for taking the time to speak with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment