OIG Hotline, at this particular time, no assessments against accounts bearing my name or associated with my identity should be allowed through allegations of wrongdoing on the part of one or more of my family members or on the part of myself, or on the basis of documentation from me allowing withdrawals other than those specified herewith, given that such documentation would represent forgeries.
Please note that this should include misspellings of my name, including Lane Macwilliams (small W), Lane Mac Williams, Lane McWilliams, Lane Williams, Lane William, LANE MACWILLIAMS, Carol Elaine Von Herzen, Lane von Herzen, and any variations of the above.
Settlements should be extended to my two sons and/or daughter-in-law with my express knowledge and consent.
At this time, I grant the OIG Hotline my permission to address misconduct by the FBI and its affiliates. Resulting penalties against the FBI or its affiliates may be funded to my accounts, but assessments may not be withdrawn for any reason at this time, except in the amount of 200 billion dollars to fund a foundation for the preservation and expansion of the National Parks, 5 billion dollars to the Smithsonian Institution for an exhibit pertaining to my case, 50 billion dollars to the Smithsonian Institution for an independent endowment, 50 billion dollars to PBS for an independent endowment, 100 billion dollars to fund a foundation for fusion research and development, and provisions for my two sons and daughter-in-law that avoid conflict of interest and meet listed requirements, as previously specified, and taxes owed on these allocations, which, in the interests of the nation, should be minimized.
Other than this, accounts affiliated with my name, any variations of my name, and/or my identity should be treated as locked, with the exception that deposits may occur.
All documentation, including deposits and appropriations made regarding this case, should be fully disclosed to the American public in perpetuity through the Smithsonian Institution until and unless I specify otherwise through my direct and ongoing communications with the Smithsonian, none of which have commenced as of this writing.
1. What are the wrongful directives that were extended to your older son yesterday afternoon at a meeting in Palo Alto?
Answer: There are allegations of commands to sign knowingly false witness statements, and further, there are allegations of commands to place explosive devices on our vehicles. Beyond this, there are allegations of the deployment of non-conventional vectors of disease, as well as allegations of the transfer of a firearm into my older son's possession.
2. So, these are all allegations of lethal or potentially lethal harms.
Answer: Yes, they are.
3. Do you feel they are credible?
Answer: Unfortunately, the allegations need to be taken seriously. The FBI appears to allege that more than 50T have been awarded in my case, so the motivation to cause egregious harm to me and to my family is overwhelmingly present.
4. Who would benefit from first degree murder toward your family members and yourself?
Answer: It is alleged that directives being given to my older son at this point are being extended through the military chain of command. So we would need to ask our military leadership if those directives are coming from our Commander in Chief, from foreign interests, or elsewhere.
The worst possible answer is all of the above.
5. On what basis could funds be misappropriated from accounts bearing your name and/or identity?
Answer: There could be false allegations that I have donated to political causes recently, something which I have not done.
There could be false allegations concerning the FBI's crimes at my family property on Cape Cod.
There could be false allegations concerning a 2010 Buick I just donated to the Disabled Veterans Empowerment Network, for which the organization has failed to give me a receipt as of this writing.
And the FBI could be perpetrating all of the above and more if they have been commanded to do so from above.
6. How could certain elected officials be exercising so much impunity at this time regarding this case? Are there any brakes on this conduct? Is there anyone who has the capacity to force them to halt this theft from the American people as a whole?
Answer: You know, the fundamental problem is that we are facing an unprecedented climate crisis. And right now, we are facing the prospect of permanent injury to the atmosphere if we don't change the stresses we are placing on the global environment as a whole.
Instead of fully informing the public about the nature of the historic challenges that are upon us, we are seeing a separation between governance and the governed.
Behind closed doors, governments are preparing for disruptive events.
Publicly, we are seeing a coarsening of political rhetoric along with articulation of ideological extremism.
But the public as a whole is not informed about the causes of this crisis, nor its planned answer.
So, the risks to everyone are heightening dramatically, and we are not seeing honest disclosure about that fact.
In such a context, profiteering becomes more commonplace, and we can even see it occurring among top leadership, which is a tragedy for the nation.
In response to your question about whether there are any safeguards in this situation, I would say that the U.S. military has the potential to place some guardrails on the problem of graft by elected leaders. The military does not like to see the sovereignty of the nation undermined, and its top officials will not go along with plans to effectively cede governance of the nation through a concealed coup. They will object in one way or another.
7. There has been speculation that the mid-term elections in November may be canceled under certain circumstances.
Answer: Yes, there has.
8. Do you see this as a realistic possibility?
Answer: When the President of the United States is publicly discussing cancellation of elections, we need to understand that this is possible under certain circumstances.
9. What is the military's view of the prospect of canceling elections?
Answer: The military understands that a cancellation of elections would render us much more vulnerable to overthrow by a foreign power. So, again, they are not in favor of damage to the architecture of the nation's governance that would render a usurper more likely to aggress against the United States. We are now seeing an increased militarization of U.S. cities, and this is partly in anticipation of a possible defense of our fundamental sovereignty.
10. So the deployment of ICE is not solely related to immigration.
Answer: No, there are multiple reasons for the deployment, and the majority of them are not being publicly disclosed.
11. What needs to happen to ensure that the wrongful directives toward your sons and daughter-in-law now cease?
Answer: Illumination of the sources of the problem is always helpful. We need President Trump to order that all attempts on the lives of my family members and my own will be halted, and further, that our health will be restored.
My older son should not be directed to participate in any further LxSxxxx-related meetings, nor should any of my children (and I include my daughter-in-law) be subjected to further harm of any kind, including sovereignty violations, and any and all tasking through any government programs or government contracts should be decisively and permanently discontinued.
12. There is an allegation that your sons and daughter-in-law have undergone the implantation of a device close to their adenoids that, once deployed, would injure the carotid artery from interior physiological means. What is the nature of this device, and what is its intent?
Answer: It is alleged to be an implanted method of murder, essentially. If either of my sons or daughter-in-law decided to disclose the truth of their experience or to disregard a command extended by his or her handler, he or she would be killed through a remote detonation of this interior implanted device.
13. Who allegedly implanted this device?
Answer: It is alleged that their oral surgeons did so.
14. Do your sons and daughter-in-law know the purpose and capabilities of this device?
Answer: They do allegedly know.
15. So the chances that they will be able to disclose to you their true experience as forcible recruits of the Pxxxxxx Program?
Answer: Zero. Until those devices are removed, the chances are zero.
16. These represent astonishing human rights violations.
Answer: Yes, they do.
17. You have spoken about many different kinds of sovereignty violations, but the implantation of the devices you describe represents a complete deprivation of the individual's ability to control their own words and actions in the course of their lives.
Answer: It does, yes.
18. Your sons and daughter-in-law could be killed at any time if these allegations are true.
Answer: Yes.
19. Why hasn't it happened yet, given the allegation that all of you have been targeted?
Answer: Because my sons and daughter-in-law are being used to sign false witness statements on command, and also, they are being directed to deploy potentially fatal harms toward other members of my family, including myself.
20. Can President Trump direct that these implanted devices be removed?
Answer: Yes, he can.
21. Shouldn't this order be extended immediately?
Answer: It most certainly should.
22. And as part of that withdrawal, shouldn't the false witness statements from your sons and daughter-in-law be disqualified?
Answer: Urgently so, yes. And beyond this, any and all false reporting regarding my properties, my vehicles, my belongings, and my communications should be withdrawn. Obviously, any all explosive devices should be removed from my vehicles and home, as should all means of harm, whether conventional or non-conventional.
Wrongful convictions that have justified such reprehensible deployments should be vacated on an immediate basis.
23. What needs to happen after that?
Answer: After that, I want to see the return of funds misappropriated from my accounts.
24. You have expressed your belief that the United States needs to be in a position of global leadership in the future regarding environmental concerns and other issues of critical importance.
Answer: Yes, I have. And this belief is ongoing. Without our global leadership role, the future of human sovereignty will be abandoned. And we cannot accept such an outcome with passivity, cowardice, or acquiescence.
We need to do more.
25. Will you please keep us updated with regard to new developments regarding your family's wellbeing and your own?
Answer: Of course I will.
26. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
