1. Your sons are allegedly both being directed to perpetrate assassinations as part of the Pxxxxxx Program in the near future. Is that the case?
Answer: This is the allegation I have received, yes.
2. Are these "assignments" intended to coerce your own actions in some manner?
Answer: I have no doubt that there is a punitive component vis a vis my recent revelations about the apparent plans of the FBI and its affiliates. And certainly, the FBI and its affiliates have desired to silence me in general.
But I think it's important to recognize that these agencies appear to have asked for silence at the same time that they have furthered plans to take the lives of my whole family.
This is a consistent pattern for the FBI. The agency extends an apparent plea for confidentiality, even while plotting first-degree murder toward those who might comply.
3. Having said that, you are not disclosing everything you know about the plans of the FBI and its affiliates.
Answer: No, I'm not. I am making ongoing assessments about what disclosures are in the best interests of the nation. And if the FBI and its affiliates have forgotten their commitment to serve the United States, I have not.
4. Your younger son has been allegedly forced to engage in drug trafficking at FBI directive, and your older son has been allegedly forced to engage in weapons trafficking at CIA directive, with the CIA acting as FBI contractor in this particular case. What is the purpose of these activities?
Answer: Basically, the FBI uses the activities the agency itself has directed for the purposes of blackmail and coercion. Once the agency forces an individual to break the law in any context, FBI personnel make it clear that they can sacrifice that individual at any time by turning around and prosecuting them publicly. The agency pleads "national security concerns" before a judge, while simultaneously explaining to their victims that it is elementary for the agency to have people killed in a prison setting. And off the individual goes to jail for a long sentence.
5. In this specific case, however, you are well informed about the agency's stratagems. So doesn't that render them ineffective?
Answer: Yes, if the FBI or its affiliates attempted to prosecute my sons, they would be wading into deep waters, given the crimes the agencies have already committed against my family members. The FBI and its affiliates can threaten these steps, but I don't think they can actually take them.
The greater risk is out and out murder of my family members, and, obviously, I face the same threat myself.
6. By the FBI?
Answer: By the FBI and its affiliates, yes. The agency has made clear to me that it has bribed certain elected and appointed officials repeatedly regarding this case. So, the agency can further plans of first-degree murder by referring to legacy concerns for highly placed leaders. And this was their objective from the beginning: leverage and control.
7. What should happen to the plans of the FBI and its affiliates regarding current "assignments" to your sons and perhaps even your daughter-in-law?
Answer: They should be canceled immediately.
8. And what about the apparent demands of the FBI that you hold silent at this point?
Answer: Again, I need to point out that I am not disclosing everything I know about the FBI's conduct outside of its mission and objectives, or even its activities within the framework of its central approved tasks.
But complete silence is not possible due to allegations of ongoing attempts to harm my loved ones.
I am endeavoring to ensure that my voice reflects wisdom, courage, discernment, insight, and often restraint.
9. What is your take on the FBI's attempt to duplicate and expand on AI-generated false reporting investigative efforts as a means of inflating the currency and enriching a handful of officials who would be regularly siphoning off funds derived from spurious judgements?
Answer: This would represent an unforgivable distortion of the intent of my case, which is to defend the long term human rights of all Americans, not to render that defense impossible.
10. Does Attorney General Pam Bondi have an important role to play in refusing to allow that approach?
Answer: Yes, her role is critical. She needs to be able to insist that knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting will not become further entrenched because of my case, but rather to ensure that the opposite will occur.
11. You have been traveling over the last five days, so your time has been limited. Will you now have the opportunity for more discussion about matters of importance regarding the country as a whole?
Answer: I plan to make the time expand, because these issues are so critical to our shared future, yes.
12. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment