1. People appear to be upset with you, because of the fact that you have identified fades as having compromised both Democrats and Republicans. Is that the case?
Answer: It would appear to be the case, yes. But I think that our leaders need to understand that the point of fades is total control over humanity in general. Fades don't really care about your political leanings. Fades are deployed for the purpose of co-opting the human will. So, all of our leaders are going to find themselves affected, and if we didn't see compromised decision-making, compromised ethics -- that would be the surprise.
Our leaders need to ask themselves not whether the public might discredit them or discriminate against them if they have suffered fade deployments. Rather they need to ask themselves whether they possess the moral courage to assess whether their decision-making has changed in any substantial way considering their long-held standards and values.
This isn't about popularity or campaigning or polls or legacy-shaping.
This is about the future of human sovereignty and whether we are going to have any.
So, we need our leaders to be identifying themselves first as members of the human race who support the self-determination and freedoms that we hold as foundational to a meaningful human society.
Maybe later, we can talk about less critical matters like our children's Little League games, and our dinner recipes, and our political leanings.
2. Is the Congress going to be able to subpoena information about the deployment of fades against the House and Senate, the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, the Executive Branch, and others?
Answer: I hope this will be considered an urgent matter for the Congress to take up, yes, and on both sides of the aisle.
3. What about you yourself? What is it like to know that fades have been deployed against you as a human rights advocate?
Answer: Well, fades make it necessary to face the hardest things, because the reality is that they are deployed with the intention of killing their victims, but only after destroying their independence and sovereignty. So, we have to look at those worst possible outcomes and we each need to make some decisions about our boundaries and our limits. No one wants to have his or her identity stolen. No one wants to be deprived of his or her God-given selfhood and ability to make decisions that derive from a lifetime of character-building.
4. You have repeatedly asked that the fades be withdrawn, but that hasn't happened.
Answer: No, it hasn't.
5. What is your feeling about that fact?
Answer: It's extremely upsetting, of course, to know that one's government intends to commit first degree murder of a human rights advocate in this manner or any other. After you get over the initial shock of that realization, you begin to ask about the most meaningful ways you can contribute to the future of human sovereignty with the sovereignty you have left.
But you don't take anything for granted. And you really need to constantly engage in the evaluation of whether your decision-making adheres to your highest ethical and personal standards.
6. Wouldn't you be able to perceive if you were departing from your previous ethical decision-making?
Answer: I do think that people can perceive that they are changing in some manner, but mostly they don't understand the cause. If you know you have suffered from one or more fade deployments, you can be quite rigorous about your self-evaluation. But it slows everything down, and that alone is an unconscionable impediment to what should be freedom of decision-making.
7. You have said you would die before you would compromise your ethics.
Answer: Yes, and that is my own way of dealing with this assault to my sovereignty. I don't think that many people would feel as strongly as I feel about this matter. But my whole identity is built on the strength of my character, and I'm not willing to compromise that integrity for anyone under any circumstances. Life and sovereignty are synonymous to me. One without the other has no meaning.
8. To be clear, you are in no way suicidal.
Answer: No, I'm not. I'm simply highly watchful and aware given the fade deployments I have suffered, which have not been withdrawn despite my requests.
9. You are trying to make the point that fades are not political.
Answer: Yes! Exactly so. If we cannot understand this fundamental point, then humanity will devolve into a lesser species. That's foreseeable from this vantage. So, we need to ask ourselves whether we are for or against the development of the human race to its fullest potential in the future. That decision is being made right now, not at some future indeterminate time.
10. What about people who feel criticized by your writings on this subject?
Answer: If people feel concerned that they made have made unethical determinations regarding my case, then I think they should be keenly interested in whether they have suffered from fade deployments without their knowledge. If there have been fade deployments against U.S. leaders or former leaders, then this would present a unique opportunity for them to express what happened from their own perspective in the cause of Americans' sovereignty in the long term.
Again, the stakes are so high in this situation that if we fail to demonstrate courage in speaking about this issue openly, we will fail in the defense of human sovereignty, and fail spectacularly.
The President who brings fades to the American public's awareness will be remembered as a staunch defender of human freedoms.
11. What if there are restrictions that prevent this disclosure?
Answer: Then we need to rely on those outside the government to say this is unacceptable.
12. People like you.
Answer: People like me. Yes. When the Executive Branch, the Congress, the DOJ and the Supreme Court are all being affected by fade deployments that cannot be discussed publicly, we have reached a crisis point in the sovereignty of the nation as a whole.
This is not a crisis that will be solved without investigative hearings, new legislation and continuous monitoring.
But when we say that our most profound problems are too confidential to talk about, we have lost the fight for our freedoms before we've begun.
If we can't name the problem, we can't solve it.
We need to have the courage to talk about this issue.
13. What are the odds that you could be killed for talking about this issue publicly?
Answer: Well, they're not zero. I'm staying at the Marriott Bonvoy Springfield Suites in Flagstaff, Arizona, and my neighbors in Suite #209 seem to be taking an unusual interest in everything I do.
14. That couldn't be by chance?
Answer: The FBI says that I'm leading a convoy of travelers who plan to stay wherever I'm staying. So unnatural interest is noteworthy.
15. What are the greatest risks in such a circumstance?
Answer: Dxx deployments and other non-conventional deployments during sleeping hours.
16. And these could lead to further harm of your dogs or yourself?
Answer: Easily.
17. Of what kind?
Answer: Brain damage, blindness, deafness (I have already lost half my hearing because of the FBI), organ damage, knee damage or damage to other joints (My dog Birdie is already limping with no discernible injury.) Other acute or chronic illnesses. Stacked fade deployments designed to cause heart attack, stroke or aneurysm. Hotel fire. FBI planted explosive device. Sniper assault. It's a long list.
Lately the FBI has also threatened car theft.
18. Does the FBI have the capability of restoring your hearing?
Answer: Unknown.
19. You were asked earlier today what you stand for. What is the answer?
Answer: I stand for the Truth. I stand for the indomitable human spirit. I stand for relentless courage in the face of long odds. I stand for the long term human rights of Americans and all those we influence. I stand for the sovereignty of the United States. I stand for our deepest, most genuine bonds to one another. I stand for generosity as an answer to defamation by the FBI. I stand for good faith as an answer to cynicism. I stand for our ability to surmount extraordinary obstacles. I stand for our capacity to transcend astonishing wrongs. I stand for the greatness of human potential. And I stand for our ability to begin again.
20. Thank you for speaking with us this evening.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment