I Am Not Patient Zero

 OIG Hotline, please be informed that I just recently took my dogs for a long walk to Ponderosa Pines Park and Ponderosa Trail.

They did walk on the grass and briefly roll on the grass, although they were wearing coats.  I had recently treated their paws with Lotrimin as a precaution.

At a distance, there were children playing with hula hoops on the lawn, but we had no interaction with them whatsoever.

The dogs rather exuberantly said hello to one older golden retriever, but they did not touch noses or paws.  I do not believe there was the possibility of any contagion of a fungal illness, though I have no idea of whether spores associated with the FBI's recent alleged dissemination of a dangerous fungal illness invade the lungs and airways.

I raise this subject because of the fact that the FBI has a history of conveying dangerous diseases to "targets of interest," only to go before a judge in a concealed proceeding and argue that she or he must be killed, or her or his pets must be killed, in order to prevent contagion.

I have been through this routine before regarding certain dangerous viral illnesses the FBI has conveyed to us, and I find this method of harm to be astoundingly manipulative and predatory.

The FBI now appears to allege that Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx has directed this approach today as a political "stratagem" intended to justify first degree murder and subsequent misappropriation of funds awarded over the course of this case.  (For the record, I don't know Sxxxxxx Mxxxxx and have no basis for judging the veracity of this allegation.)

What is the reality of this circumstance?

The FBI appears to be playing with numerous pathogens, intentionally disseminated to the American public, with the express purpose of causing mxxx fxxxxxxxxx.

The agency finds it convenient to silence its critics by alleging that they are "patient zero" in what later is to become an out-of-control pxxxxxxx.

With falsified evidence of "patient zero" status for a given "target of interest," the FBI goes before a judge to ask for the death penalty "in the interests of public safety."

Later, in what the FBI publicly characterizes as a "tragic" sequence of events, many people dxx.

And this is allegedly what the FBI has attempted to do today in indicting me for taking my dogs for a walk when the FBI allegedly caused them a deadly fungal infection.

Normally, I would not post this information on my blog, for confidentiality reasons.

But the FBI clearly has yet to learn its lesson here.

I will be contacting various authorities regarding the FBI's conduct in this instance, and I will be making them all public.

If President Trump chooses to withdraw this intentional harm from my dogs, from myself, from the Flagstaff Veterinary Hospital, and from the community of Flagstaff, that would be highly appropriate.

If not, history will remember him as a President who violated all human rights with the apparent intention of personally profiteering from that process.

That's his call, certainly, and I'm sure he will consider it with care.

Thank you for allowing me to extend this documentation to your Office today.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams