1, The FBI has reportedly caused your impending divorce through a myriad of harms to your marriage and family, yet the agency is also depriving you of a lawyer, Linda Anderson, because it appears to be afraid that you might gain genuine legal advocacy regarding your case. What are your thoughts on this circumstance, please?
Answer: I find it to be an appalling violation of my human rights, and I refuse to accept it.
2. What recourse do you have?
Answer: I'm going on strike. All my efforts on behalf of the nation as a whole have ended up strengthening the enemies of the United States and those staunchly opposed to long term human sovereignty. So, this is deeply disappointing, and I simply won't tolerate ongoing violations of my standards.
3. Is the United States a failed nation because of the way certain elected officials are handling this matter?
Answer: You know, failed nations embrace knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, propaganda, defamation, human trafficking, drug trafficking, wrongful imprisonment, unjustified torture and first-degree murder against such regimes' detractors.
So there are enormous warning signs when it comes to my case.
When I checked into a hotel in Sedona, Arizona yesterday afternoon, the FBI appeared to reference a nearby "black site" designed for the torture and killing of the agency's critics. This is clearly designed to terrorize the agency's betters, and it has no place in our society.
4. You were feeling extremely nauseous today because of an apparent fade deployment last night -- this, at the same time that you were requesting that all fades be withdrawn immediately. Would you care to reflect on this situation?
Answer: Competent leadership is not going to allow sovereignty violations against those advocating for the nation's long term human sovereignty, because the damaging effects on the country as a whole are greatly amplified.
I find the FBI's decision-making to be monstrous, and I reject it out of hand.
It's not just that these FBI personnel are betraying the nation; it's that they are betraying the human race.
5. Meanwhile, you have had great difficulty obtaining safe food and water, including an incident at a take-out restaurant yesterday. Can you express what happened?
Answer: I ordered four chicken sandwiches at a McDonald's in Tucson, and I paid $26.00 for them, after which the restaurant refused to provide me with the food. I was nearly fainting from hunger, and this restaurant willfully failed to extend the food I had paid for. My order never appeared on the electronic board as being in progress. And it seems the FBI thought this was an amusing denial of nourishment. Ultimately, I needed to walk out, because it was clear I was never going to be served.
6. What are your thoughts about this experience?
Answer: Again, it's completely unacceptable to me. Denying food to a famished person is not a joke. It's concentration camp territory, and I find it highly notable that the FBI thinks this is amusing conduct. The malice of this agency is quite an indictment.
7. When you stopped to charge your electric vehicle this afternoon, a woman appeared to stalk you and your dogs through the parking lot. Is that the case?
Answer: Yes, she was mildly harassing us, following us with her car, calling out the window to ask about the dogs. I face this kind of situation all the time. Who knows what falsehoods accompanied the antics? But, depending on the lies, this conduct can be highly endangering.
8. Her conduct was so unusual that you later photographed her license plate. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is. The Arizona plates showed 431 YRK.
9. How does it make you feel to be stalked in public in this manner?
Answer: Deeply saddened for our country. No worthy nation can be built on lies about the virtuous.
10. What do you make of allegations that your case is being used as an inflation vector regarding intentional and concealed monetary policy?
Answer: Again, I think this is cause for grief. My case should never be used to cause harm to the American public.
11. And no one has been willing to meet with you to discuss your case and its importance for the human rights of Americans as a whole?
Answer: No, they have not. Two senators and a governor asked to meet with me and then cancelled. But I have spoken to no one about my case.
12. So, how does it feel to have divorce attorney decline to represent you at the directive of the FBI, when the FBI, through myriad means, has dictated your divorce?
Answer: Annihilating. It feels like a prelude to a murder, in which the FBI is focusing on isolating the victim from all known supports. Institutionally, it fits with the FBI's credo of "disrupt, discredit and divide." But more than this, it just represents psychopathic predatory behavior, in which the victim is separated from all family and friends prior to first-degree murder.
13. You don't have any faith in the goodwill of the FBI or its affiliates.
Answer: Decidedly not. This agency has deprived me of all of my human rights over a period of years, and the threats are now worse than they have ever been.
14. Do you give credence to the FBI's threats of abduction and murder?
Answer: The FBI's affiliates have perpetrated abductions all through Central and South America, so yes, it is reasonable to assume that the horror of abduction will be brought to the United States due to the predations of the FBI as well.
15. What would happen to the awards extended to you if you suddenly disappeared, were imprisoned, or were murdered by the FBI?
Answer: Those funds would be misappropriated within a short period of time, and the American public would likely never hear about them.
16. So, you protest your treatment on every level.
Answer: Yes, I do. The fade deployments as fundamental sovereignty violations alone are extremely wrong. The deprivation of legal counsel is appalling and unacceptable. The intent to isolate, harm, and profiteer from my case is unconscionable.
All of it represents an astonishing betrayal of good faith, and the fact that my case has become this horrible distortion of justice is something of which the nation's leaders should be ashamed.
17. Has the government failed to fulfill its most basic responsibilities to you and to the public of the United States?
Answer: The treatment has been outside of all bounds of human decency, of the requirements of jurisprudence, and of representative government.
18. The government is still ignoring the requirements of the Supreme Court to provide you with investigative reports concerning your case.
Answer: Yes.
19. What are your thoughts about a DOJ that ignores Supreme Court rulings?
Answer: It's likely that Pam Bondi lost her job over this issue alone, because she likely expressed that, as Attorney General, she was responsible for upholding those rulings.
But when the Supreme Court is ignored, the results for the nation are devastating. We cannot expect that the long term future of the nation can be protected on any level when the Supreme Court is disrespected and disregarded.
So, we're seeing an abandonment of Constitutional requirements.
20. You are deeply disappointed. Is that fair to say?
Answer: It is fair to say. I need to re-evaluate all aspects of this matter and my participation in advocating for the American people, because my efforts appear to be serving the adversaries of the United States, and not advancing the long term human rights about which I care so deeply.
21. Will you be writing further about the compromise of your safety through fade deployments?
Answer: Stacked fade deployments are usually intended to result in heart attack, stroke or aneurysm, but yes, the loss of full sovereignty they result in is by far the worst consequence of the monstrosity that such deployments constitute. Presuming I don't have a heart attack, stroke or aneurysm, I will be writing much more about this, yes.
22. You have repeatedly asked for outreach regarding your case, and you have repeatedly been answered with silence, isolation, and violations of your most fundamental freedoms.
Answer: I have.
23. Your friends, including your minister, have suffered extreme targeting by the FBI in their own right.
Answer: Yes.
24. And still, no one has been willing to speak with you regarding these most critical concerns.
Answer: You know, money is profoundly corrupting, and when money, not people, is the most important priority of government, then we see horrible distortions developing in which the government is profiteering from the torture of the people.
25. With regard to your properties, has the FBI apologized for its conduct?
Answer: Not as of this moment, no. Any forward progress with my properties seems designed to create knowingly false reports and planted evidence, with an apparent intent to lead to arrest and worse.
26. And, remarkably, you know that names of the individuals most responsible for these schemes?
Answer: I do know their names, yes.
27. What is your opinion of these individuals?
Answer: These people struggle with self-hatred, insecurity, and severe mental illness. They should not be in charge of a goldfish bowl, much less critical aspects of governance of the United States.
28. What does it say about the United States when serial killers are permitted to stalk, harass, terrorize and harm the honorable public over a period of long years, without anyone in the government halting the abuse?
Answer: What, indeed?
29. Will you please continue writing about these issues, given their import for so many?
Answer: You know, it's all I can now do. All other recourse has been closed to me. My only option is to write publicly about the FBI's predations in the hope that this information will be preserved and made accessible by historical examination of this period of time.
30. Can history hold the worst of the FBI's perpetrators accountable?
Answer: It can and it must.
31. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment