1. There appears to have been an Executive Order, allegedly originating with Vladimir Putin, to take your life on the basis of recent disclosures you made regarding the dissemination of fades in an extensive manner against U.S. leadership within the Congress, the Supreme Court, the U.S. DOJ, the Executive Branch, and even extending to the U.S. military leadership and certain agents within the FBI and CIA, as well as toward the American public.
May I have your response to this allegation?
Answer: It's not unexpected, in that Vladimir Putin would be quite concerned about a Congressional investigation into the manner in which he has violated our national sovereignty.
2. Have you seen any signs of such an "assignment" in or near your hotel in Flagstaff, Arizona?
Answer: There are a few suspicious characters wandering around with what seem like Eastern European-style backpacks who seem to do nothing but monitor the parking lot where my car is located.
3. Should Vladimir Putin be directing President Trump to extend Executive Orders?
Answer: The FBI indicates that Vladimir Putin directed at least one fade deployment toward President Trump himself, which stands as a great irony in this situation. No, Vladimir Putin should not be directing our own President to extend Executive Orders.
4. Where does your safety reside?
Answer: It resides in this conversation, frankly. The American public could have no greater confirmation of the urgent sovereignty crisis that Russia has imposed on our nation than further aggression against my family members or myself.
5. So, what should happen to that alleged Executive Order?
Answer: I think Vladimir Putin will understand that it is in his best interest to withdraw it immediately.
I intend to move around Flagstaff with freedom and safety, without others' entry to my hotel room or any targeted or environmental harms whatsoever, whether toward my dogs or myself.
6. Will the Congress take up the matter of fades on an urgent basis?
Answer: Oh, I believe so. I'm sure the subpoenas are being prepared.
7. What will happen when the list of fade deployments is determined? Are there tests of autonomy and independent decision-making that can be utilized to assess the health of our leaders?
Answer: I am under the impression that the FBI has made quite a study of individual sovereignty and its compromise. My understanding is that complete recovery from fade deployment is dependent on the length of time that the fade has been present, as well as numerous other factors.
But certainly, the FBI is responsible for disclosing everything it knows about fade withdrawal and "hosts'" recovery.
8. Why do you use the word "host"?
Answer: Fades are parasites, and their victims are hosts. Fades can be thought of as a low level of plasma energy that slowly feeds off of host tissue to survive. That's problematic enough, because of gradual cortical atrophy, but the most pressing issue is the invasion of consciousness and decision-making while the host still perceives him or herself as independent.
9. Is the word "fades" an acronym?
Answer: The FBI alleges so, yes.
10. Do you know what the letters stand for?
Answer: No, I do not.
11. To what extent are jellies also germane to this investigation?
Answer: I think they should be included in every inquiry about these remote sovereignty violations. Jellies are allegedly somewhat less dangerous, but I don't know the details.
12. How quickly can our Congress get to the truth of this circumstance?
Answer: They can initiate their investigation very rapidly, I'm sure. In the meantime, the FBI should be sharing everything it knows about withdrawal and remediation for our leaders.
13. Will you please continue to keep us informed about your wellbeing in Flagstaff?
Answer: Yes, of course.
14. Thank you for speaking with us this evening.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment