1. It has been suggested that the Congress is weighing RICO prosecution of the manner in which your case is being manipulated for the profiteering of this administration. May I know your thoughts?
Answer: If RICO prosecutions have a four-year statute of limitations, as the Supreme Court has suggested, then such a prosecution could occur, yes.
2. This administration has reportedly forged documents in your name, extended fake donations in your name, and committed other crimes in a scheme of sequestering large amounts from awards that have been extended to you. Should all of that conduct come to light?
Answer: You know, this is exceedingly difficult for people who feel that they are not accountable, but I am a person who upholds the truth. I just do not believe we can rescue human sovereignty without a commitment to the truth. Yes, the specifics should come to light.
If certain leaders have sustained fade deployments and other sovereignty violations, and these FBI aggressions have caused misjudgments and mistakes among our leadership, then we need to know it all.
But I think it's clear that we cannot rescue American sovereignty by hiding what has transpired. We just need to be phenomenally courageous about it, and in this way, ensure that we have much more robust defenses against these violations in the future.
3. What should happen to funds that were misappropriated through criminal conduct relating to your awards?
Answer: I need to state once again that the risks to Americans' sovereignty that are present through the sequestering of funds by Vladimir Putin and other opponents of human freedom are profound.
Accordingly, we need to ensure that funds that were awarded in this case come back to the greatest extent possible. We cannot have vast wealth being accumulated by the Txx Lxxxx types within the FBI and among its affiliates. Their loyalties are with Russia.
Similarly, we cannot have our elected or appointed officials profiteering from the suffering of the public, because the incentives there are disastrous.
And I think that, as critical as the sovereignty concerns are relating to the misappropriations of funds by the FBI and its affiliates, there are greater sovereignty concerns relating to fade deployments by the FBI, human trafficking crimes by the FBI, torture by the FBI, wrongful directives by the FBI, false reporting by the FBI, defamation by the FBI, concealed prosecutions by the FBI, and meting out of concealed sentences by the FBI.
4. Successful RICO prosecutions would require the return of misappropriations of funds in this case.
Answer: Then they should occur, and hopefully, the anticipation of that outcome would halt the outflow of funds based on current criminal schemes. The National Treasury is not an ATM. Russia's attempt to turn it into one are profoundly wrong and offensive.
5. Are these acts of war by Russia against the United States?
Answer: They are better understood as acts of treason by the FBI, the CIA, and their affiliates, who are loyal to Russia.
There is a push for one world government. The FBI and the CIA understand the origins of that impetus as residing with Russia and others, and so they feel their treasonous conduct can be justified.
6. Do you disagree?
Answer: I do. I believe the American people deserve to know the truth of what is occurring on the world stage and the manner in which their lives will be affected. Part of that picture is an inflationary policy that is utilizing my case as a conduit for vast money printing and misappropriations, over my strenuous objections and to my family's great peril and my own. That is a Russian agenda, not a domestic one.
Now, with our understanding of the FBI's widespread fade deployments, we can get a clearer view into the manner in which the FBI and its affiliates have sought to perpetrate an invisible coup toward the nation as a whole.
7. The Congress must be shocked over this disclosure.
Answer: Everyone should be shocked over this disclosure.
8. The Congress recently renewed the FBI's FISA 702, which allows the aggregation of communications of Americans through a large-scale surveillance program, but only for ten days. What is your view of that decision?
Answer: My praise to the members of Congress. I believe our elected leaders are requiring an explanation from the FBI regarding fade deployments, and they're holding the agency's feet to the fire until they get the information they need.
9. Are there specific questions the Congress should be asking?
Answer: When J. Edgar Hoover died, it was discovered that he had directed and maintained extensive "Official and Confidential" files on virtually all members of Congress, and every President during his tenure as FBI Director, including "reams of information" about their families, their friends, and their contacts.
If I were a member of Congress currently, I would be asking for complete files about each member of the House and Senate. Because, allow me to observe, fade deployments are only perpetrated when the FBI is claiming that the intended "host" has done something wrong.
I have been speaking about knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting for a long time.
The Congress should now see how it applies to them and to their families, not merely to me and mine.
10. Are there any other specific questions they should be asking when it comes to fade deployments?
Answer: Fade deployments are often first directed to the pet of a targeted individual, with a later transfer of the fade to the intended host. So the Congress should be asking about deployments to their pets that may have later affected them. The FBI will have all of these records.
11. You have said that fade deployments serve to hollow out the victim's personality over time.
Answer: That's true. Over time there is reported to be a diminishment of affect, conscience, ethical engagement, higher order reasoning, the quality and character of decision-making, the depth of human bonds, the capacity to love others, loyalty toward others, the extent and quality of emotional memory and factual memory, and the boundaries that prevent reckless sexual or violent acts.
12. Is the deployment of fades fundamentally intended to deconstruct human self-governance?
Answer: Yes, it is. It can be understood as an attack on the human race as a whole, and one that is not intended to be withdrawn.
It would be difficult to imagine an assault against our national security that was more serious.
13. Will you be commenting further on fade deployments over this critical period of time, when the Congress is making urgent assessments as to the damage wrought by the FBI against our national security interests?
Answer: Yes, certainly.
14. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment