My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Request for an Appeal

 1.  The FBI has appeared to state this morning that it will not be relinquishing control of the U.S. government.  May I know your thoughts about this assertion?

Answer:  Oh, I think it will.  After the revelations about the FBI's attempted coup through deploying fades against the entire House and Senate, the entire Executive Branch, a large part of the DOJ, and a significant number of military leaders, I don't think American leadership is particularly inclined to enable more of the FBI's abuses of power.

2.  Will the Congress get the information they require regarding the FBI's conduct in this area?

Answer:  I have no doubt that through FISA withholding, budget withholding, and other methods, the United States Congress can obtain the material they need.

3.  You have said that special emphasis should be placed on identifying those FBI personnel and affiliates associated with your case who have not suffered fade deployments.  May I ask why that is?

Answer:  Because those are the ones who have been deploying fades against others.  Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx have been boasting for years about the American president being a "marionette" due to fade deployments.  I'm sure the Executive Branch, over two administrations, is not going to be particularly happy about those statements.

4.  If Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx are found primarily responsible for the deployment of fades against the elected and appointed leadership of the United States, what is their crime?  Is it espionage, a crime which, ironically enough, they have wrongfully projected onto you and your family?

Answer:  Are they guilty of espionage?  Almost certainly.  (And thank you for clarifying that my family and I are not.)

But more than this, I think there may be charges of treason involved.

So, it is difficult to imagine a more serious result of these men's egregious misconduct against our national security interests over the course of recent years.

5.  These individuals have argued that they have immunity from prosecution with regard to your case.

Answer:  Treason against the government as a whole is likely a different problem for them entirely.  I don't think they have immunity regarding treason, and I don't think any court will be granting it to them.

6.  In retaliation for your alerting the government about the conduct of Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx, the FBI has appeared to advance knowingly false accusations about you and your family not through the Supreme Court, but through a different judge.  Would you like to comment on that conduct?

Answer:  The FBI has allegedly taken false evidence to Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx, yes, with the specific intention of obtaining a concealed capital judgment.

7.  You are choosing not to name the particular Judge alleged to be involved in this scheme.

Answer:  I am not naming her, no, because I don't feel that our judges should be publicly singled out, even in extreme circumstances such as this one.  We need to know that our judicial processes are protected from threats, bribery, and coercion of all kinds.  So we have to maintain these guardrails, even when we suspect that a particular judgment has been corrupted.

8.  Is Txx Lxxxx still attempting to project onto you and your family legal blame for his own alleged capital crimes connected to one or more of your properties?

Answer:  This is what the FBI alleges, yes.  It may be that he is feeling panicked over these new revelations about his crimes against the nation as a whole.  So, he may not want to deal with people who can speak knowledgeably about his criminal history.

9.  What should occur with regard to his approach to Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx with false evidence and the resulting plans to take not only your life, but the lives of your family members and pets as well?

Answer:  I would respectfully ask for an appeal to be filed with the Supreme Court regarding Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx's judgement and sentencing, and I would hope to have the support of our leaders in the U.S. government in doing so on an immediate basis.

10.  The FBI appeared to cause an Achilles tendon tear in your dog two days ago, and now is alleged to have planned with a Flagstaff veterinary office to inject her with a deadly zoonotic parasite known as lungworm disease, in addition to a viral zoonotic infection that is alleged to cause heart attack within several weeks. In addition, there may be other pathogens involved of which you are unaware.   Is this the result of the wrongful judgement for which Txx Lxxxx asked Judge Axxxxx Cxxxxx?

Answer:  Absolutely.  The FBI is running its own Crime and Punishment series in which the crimes are, if not made up, then wrongfully attributed to the innocent.  After that, concealed judicial proceedings, judgements and sentencing lead to exactly this type of aggression.

11.  Can this be considered an assassination attempt?

Answer:  I believe so, yes.

12.  What is the appropriate response?

Answer:  The appropriate response is always a lawful one, and hopefully one that exposes the wrongdoing that caused a spurious judgement.  We need to recognize that the FBI is acting not only as the enemy of the United States, but also as the enemy of human sovereignty.  These personnel have had no meaningful checks on their misconduct that diverges from mission and objectives.  And that needs to change without delay.

13.  What is your response to the FBI's assertion that you need to make sacrifices at this time?

Answer:  I'll let the FBI know when I'll be making sacrifices of any nature.  I think it's the FBI's turn to make some sacrifices in its abusive overreach.  The agency's misconduct has led to appalling aggression against the United States government, and now the presumption of trust and confidence in FBI personnel has reached an undeniable nadir.

We cannot allow the agency to return to business as usual, because business as usual for the FBI was treason.

So we need to demand change, and now is the time.

14.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

No comments:

Post a Comment