1. How do you respond to FBI allegations that your disclosures regarding the FBI's deployment of fades against U.S. leadership represents an "existential threat" to the nation?
Answer: Well, I think that's quite a projection. For Vladimir Putin to attempt a hidden coup of the United States by directing the FBI to deploy fades against our Congress, our Supreme Court, our Executive Branch, certain members of the DOJ, the U.S. military leadership, and even certain key state governments -- this is the existential threat to our sovereignty.
2. What about Russian threats regarding the deployment of non-conventional weapons?
Answer: Vladimir Putin has often discussed the use of non-conventional weapons, but only in the context of other conflicts. He always wants to project blame onto certain "radical factions" in order to absolve himself from the moral stain that history would attribute to him. So, we need to be fully educated about his thinking in this regard, and maintain the pressure on him by letting him know he will be held fully accountable for any such acts.
The truth is that fades represent non-conventional warfare in and of themselves, and those within the FBI who have directed their deployment against U.S. leadership have engaged in treasonous acts.
3. There can be no justification for the deployment of fades in this circumstance?
Answer: Fades represent an enslavement of our leadership and our nation as a whole. No, there can be no justification.
It's important to understand just how insidious fade deployments are.
The "hosts" of fade deployments ordinarily have no idea that they have been affected. Even so, gradually, they are going to experience an erosion of their character, personality, identity, moral compass, empathy toward others, boundaries, ethical framework, decision-making and conduct.
They may recognize that there is a change in their decision-making, but they are highly unlikely to understand the origins of that change.
In other words, they still feel as though they are making independent determinations, even when they are not.
These are parasitic deployments that involve a gradual hollowing out of individual character.
So, they go right to the heart of who we are as human beings, including our ability to make the most important decisions affecting our lives and the lives of those surrounding us.
4. Does the FBI need broad scale fade deployments to achieve its mission and objectives?
Answer: Absolutely not.
Fade deployments against U.S. leadership have been perpetrated for the purpose of totalitarian control over the United States by a foreign adversary, and for no other reason than this.
5. The FBI states that your sons have suffered "stacked" fade deployments involving ten or more fades each. How much individual control over decision-making can an individual exert if they have suffered ten or more fade deployments?
Answer: Zero. It's just too great a burden for any one individual to sustain.
6. So, the individual's original character, personality, boundaries and decision-making -- in the event of such stacked deployments -- are effectively ...?
Answer: Annihilated. They simply cannot defend against wrongful directives in that state.
7. And the FBI is fully aware of this?
Answer: Oh, yes. They extend these stacked deployments when they intend to render someone guilty of criminal acts that the handlers themselves direct. It becomes a "Crime and Punishment" puppet show for the FBI, a stage play in which they exercise full control.
8. And has the FBI demanded false witness statements from your sons when they have been burdened by these extreme "stacked" fade deployments?
Answer: This is the FBI's allegation, yes.
9. False witness statements regarding their childhoods?
Answer: Exactly so. This is what the FBI has suggested.
10. What are your thoughts about this?
Answer: I know my sons extremely well. I know the strength of their character. They never would have signed false witness statements if they had been in possession of their sovereignty.
11. What should happen next for your sons?
Answer: The fades should be withdrawn in their entirety, and my sons should be allowed to give their true testimony as to the torture they have suffered at the hands of the FBI and its affiliates. Whether or not that information is rendered immediately public is up to them. But it needs to be documented as part of the formal record, because there is the possibility that great good can result from their accounts.
If we care about the long term sovereignty of Americans, then we need to hear from my sons and daughter-in-law.
12. What about those who would wish to suppress that testimony, because they are concerned that they will be blamed for wrongfully authorizing these acts of torture?
Answer: If they have suffered fade deployments themselves, then they are in a position to take the larger view for the good of the nation. In other words, if their judgment could possibly have been compromised, then the truth about the perils for all of us regarding diminished sovereignty need to be openly evaluated.
Again, we cannot solve this problem without courage, honesty, integrity and disclosure.
We need to be stronger than our adversaries expect us to be.
The United States has always had a capacity for self-examination, and that might just serve to rescue the cause of human sovereignty.
This is tough territory. Let's demonstrate that we're up to the challenge.
13. How do you think about problem-solving in general? Because these are unprecedented problems for our country, and yet you seem to hold to the belief that we can surmount them.
Answer: I think about problem-solving in terms of transformation. The hardest problems can be harnessed to their own destruction, in a way.
Once we comprehend the means of attack with regard to a deployment such as that involved with fades, we can illuminate it and dismantle it by going after the origins and methods of dissemination. Fades are not indestructible. We need to demonstrate that we have greater resilience and adaptability than they do.
14. Should the use of fades be prohibited as acts of war in both a domestic and international context?
Answer: Without question.
15. Once the U.S. Congress fully characterizes what has happened domestically with regard to fade deployments, should we notify other countries about these developments?
Answer: This is a worldwide concern. Yes.
16. How are you yourself feeling, given that you have suffered stacked fade deployments in unknown number?
Answer: I am feeling fantastic about having exposed this issue for our nation's sovereignty and the sovereignty of all those we will influence. It just gives me great pleasure to be in the position to shine a bright light on this critical concern, knowing that now we will have the chance to defeat it.
17. Who inspires you when you are required to stand alone on a critical issue?
Answer: My parents. My grandparents. Many outstanding leaders throughout history, including Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Jr., Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
Leadership is not always about having a lot of company in the beginning.
Sometimes, it means that you are standing alone, speaking for the cause of freedom, not knowing whether anyone can hear your words.
But if we believe in the indomitable human spirit, we're going to try anyway, in the hope that, as Abraham Lincoln said, we can attain a "new birth of freedom," and that human sovereignty, with all its attendant gifts, "shall not perish from the Earth."
18. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment