1. Your sons are allegedly still being asked to cause harm to your family. Is that correct?
Answer: Yes, it is.
2. Where are these directives coming from?
Answer: My sons are allegedly receiving them as Executive orders.
3. Orders from the Executive Branch?
Answer: Yes.
4. Your sons were both wrongfully conscripted into the Pxxxxxx Program, entirely against their will, and with the express intention of coercing them to provide knowingly false witness statements regarding your family that would lead to your deaths, and, ultimately, their own. Is that your understanding?
Answer: Yes, it is.
5. Over recent days, what has happened to your sons and your daughter-in-law?
Answer: Torture, human trafficking, Pxxxxxx Program "assignments," and "cleaning assignments." Agency personnel probably directed them to move a few packages from one place to another so that they could wrongfully claim drug dealing or terrorism activity.
6. In addition to all of those horrors, did the FBI and its affiliates coerce your sons and daughter-in-law to provide knowingly false witness statements regarding your family?
Answer: This is always part of the drill. Once their sovereignty is decimated, then their handlers demand that false witness statements -- which have already been composed -- be signed. As soon as that is accomplished, those statements are taken into a courtroom somewhere and the FBI argues for capital punishment for crimes of which we know nothing whatsoever.
7. What crimes do you think the FBI -- and I'm assuming that Txx Lxxxx is leading the charge on this initiative -- is alleging that you and/or your husband may have committed through aggregating false witness statements from your sons and daughter-in-law?
Answer: Well, the unconstitutional part of this is that I have no idea. At various points, the FBI has indirectly claimed that it is wrongfully accusing us of everything from mental illness to espionage to human trafficking to terrorism to child abuse to capital crimes. We just don't know, and, not having the wrongful accusations to examine, we have scant means of defending ourselves.
8. Your sons have confirmed for you many times that they had happy childhoods and suffered no abuse whatsoever. Isn't that true?
Answer: Yes, it is.
9. So, why is Txx Lxxxx circling back to this false accusation?
Answer: The FBI appears to have stated that his own father abused him in his childhood. If so, there is likely psychiatric pathology driving this particular individual. It's possible that he never found the strength of character to accuse his own father. Instead, he may be taking satisfaction in accusing innocent American parents. This represents the psychological phenomenon known as projection.
But some have appeared to suggest that the FBI is also routinely accusing Americans of Communism, prostitution, drug abuse and a whole set of other unlawful behaviors.
10. Is Txx Lxxxx' career on the line because he staged a set of unknown crimes at your family's property on Cape Cod?
Answer: Again, this has not been disclosed to me directly. But quite a few people have appeared to suggest that Txx Lxxxx has repeatedly defamed me regarding to crimes he staged at one or more of my properties.
11. And you have now requested that all of this information be transferred to the Smithsonian Institution. Is that the case?
Answer: Yes, it is. I'm not fearful of complete illumination of this matter. The FBI is. So, I have requested that all documentation be transferred to the Smithsonian. If I am alive and well, I will assist in curating that exhibit, which should exist in perpetuity. If not, all legitimate documents should be made available to the public for their examination.
12. Do you include all documentation pertaining to your sons in materials you wish to be transferred to the Smithsonian at this time?
Answer: Yes, I do. I am serving as Durable Power of Attorney for my older son, so I have the legal standing to insist that this information be included.
13. Why is this important?
Answer: Because my sons and daughter-in-law have had their sovereignty stolen from them, yet the American public has no idea what that means.
14. What does it mean?
Answer: It means that an individual has his or her free will erased, and in its place, the FBI will be dictating their words, their actions, their attestations about the past, their health, their medications, their sanity, their relationships, their marriages, their finances, their intimacy, whether they have children, their education, their friends, where they live, whether they can travel, and the manner and timing of their deaths.
That's what it means.
15. Anything else?
Answer: When there is this degree of totalitarian control over an individual, then their potential for development is strictly circumscribed -- and this means their intellectual development, their social development, their emotional development and their spiritual development are dramatically diminished.
So, that's a fair characterization of how devastating sovereignty violations by the FBI actually are, and it's a realistic portrait of our future if we do nothing about the course we're currently taking.
16. Because of the fact that the stakes are so high for humanity, you want the logs of the torture and trafficking crimes of the FBI affiliates against your sons to be made available to the American public.
Answer: Yes, I do. Their names can be redacted, but all of the information regarding the crimes against their sovereignty, and what the FBI did to them following the loss of their self-determination, should be made public.
17. We have always, throughout human history, assumed that free will would remain intact for humanity, haven't we?
Answer: The works of classical antiquity, thousands of years old, spend a great deal of time on the concept of free will. The Greeks were tremendously interested in the manner in which the character of a person determined their fate, and Sophocles and Homer and Aeschylus were all profoundly concerned with the course of human destiny as defined by self-determined human identity.
Lucretius wrote about the fact that, even though the outer world may "strike against a man"* to act in a certain way, he may choose to exercise restraint. He may choose to resist.
So, yes, we have assumed that free will would remain available to us. And when we remove mankind's ability to choose his own words and his own actions, then we lose everything that is meaningful to human civilization.
18. Given the nature of human rights violations currently transpiring through the FBI and its affiliates, what are the chances that we will be able to rescue the most important facets of human sovereignty?
Answer: In the short term, we are not likely to rescue sovereignty, unfortunately. Our circumstances are now too imperiled by the climate crisis and other challenges, and the FBI is not inclined to withdraw its sovereignty violations against the public at this time.
But in the long term, we may be able to insist that sovereignty return to us. That's what I'm striving for, and that's why I'm asking others to strive alongside me.
And to be clear, sovereignty does not mean that we're deciding whether to have the vanilla or the chocolate ice cream cone.
It means that we're deciding whether our lives will be filled with learning, epiphany, friendship, genuine love for one another, scientific discovery, masterworks of art, sustainable stewardship of the environment, spiritual growth, and advancement in every area of human potential we can imagine.
So, this matters, and it matters more than anything else we've ever done.
19. Given the tremendous concerns, what can be done in the short term to try to hold onto the best of our humanity? What can you do regarding your own circumstances when your two sons are being wrongfully directed to take the lives of your family members as a Christmas gathering?
Answer: Illumination is always the answer regarding these intended crimes. Txx Lxxxx is attempting to take the lives of my family members for the purpose of profiteering from funds awarded in my name pertaining to my complaint against the FBI through the OIG Hotline at the U.S. Department of Justice. So, those accounts, with the exception of those funds I have designated for the Smithsonian Institution, should be locked and inaccessible at this time.
20. The FBI has encouraged you to give up this battle for the future of our nation and the freedom of our people, hasn't it?
Answer: There is no giving up. If we love our children, our neighbors, our nation, and our wider world, there is no giving up.
All that is best within us -- our courage, our fortitude, our faith, our kindness, our leadership, our deepest bonds to one another, and our vision for the future -- depends on our perseverance against wind and weather.
21. And you're still standing.
Answer: I'm still standing, and I'm still expressing my gratitude for those who are choosing to stand with me in defense of the sovereignty of our nation and the American people.
22. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
*Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, referenced by Stephen Greenblatt, The Swerve, W.W. Norton, copyright 2011, First Edition, p. 189.
No comments:
Post a Comment