My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Friday, May 30, 2025

Continuing Illumination of Knowingly False Reporting Against a Whistleblower and Her Family

 1.  May I know your response to the FBI's recent allegations that the agency is coercing knowingly false witness statements from your neighbors, and creating other falsified evidence, in order to pursue knowingly false allegations against you or your family members?

Answer:  The FBI is pursuing a totalitarian agenda, and is counting on obfuscation, AI-generated false evidence, falsified witness statements, etc. to do so.  This is consistent with the agency's prior bent, but it is likely that the volume and severity of the falsehoods is increasing at this time.  

2.  How is it possible to combat these dangerous falsehoods?

Answer:  By continuing to expose them when it comes to my family members and myself, which I retain the full right and provenance to do.

3.  Do you have the impression that the agency believes it can actually prevail in court?

Answer:  No, the FBI knows by this time that it cannot prevail in court against me.  So the agency is attempting to utilize a violent law enforcement raid, violent street crime, medical accident, staged car accident, staged plane accident, staged suicide -- this kind of thing -- to attempt to conceal first-degree murder with an intent to profiteer from the misappropriation of funds awarded in my name through the OIG Hotline.

4.  Are you endeavoring to be more alert to possible threats given these circumstances?

Answer:  Of course, yes.

5.  Have there been recent Supreme Court rulings in your favor?

Answer:  While I am not privy to that information, I will simply say that I believe in the integrity of the Supreme Court.  I believe the Honorable Justices have their eyes focused on preserving the long term freedoms of Americans and the long term sovereignty of the nation on which those freedoms depend.  So I anticipate that the Supreme Court has been favorable toward my attempts to support the United States in all of these respects, and I believe that the Honorable Justices will continue to express this standpoint.

6.  Do you possess the ongoing support of the OIG Hotline, the Congress, and the Joint Committee?

Answer:  It is important for us to recognize the heroes among all of these groups, and the manner in which they continue to stand in support of our long term sovereignty by siding with my case.  Yes, I believe the support is there.

7.  Are you attempting to take additional security measures at your home at this time, in an effort to ensure your safety and that of your family insofar as possible?

Answer:  Yes, I am endeavoring to install redundant security systems.  And my puppies are blessedly vigilant at all hours.  So, I feel that I'm taking the steps that I need to take to support our long term wellbeing on the part of my own initiatives.  Of course, I hope that is being mirrored by protective interventions on the part of those in Washington, DC and elsewhere who are advocating for us faithfully.

8.  Will you please keep us up-to-date on your wellbeing and that of your family members?

Answer:  With dedication.  

9.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.





Lane MacWilliams


Thursday, May 29, 2025

A Response to the FBI's Defamation Toward My Family

 1.  You and your family are receiving threats from the FBI of the conveyance of chronic or acute disease through a non-conventional vector.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, I am.  Threats include MS, ALS, dementia of various etiologies, cancer, HIV, syphilis, on and on.

2.  You have no risk factors for HIV or syphilis.  Is that true?

Answer:  That is true, yes.  No risk factors whatsoever.  But that does not prevent the FBI from conveying a whole panoply of diseases to my family members and myself as its "targets of interest."

3.  The FBI appears to enjoy impugning the upstanding character of its "targets" such as yourself by using the presence of antibodies as a tool of defamation.  Have you been informed of this?

Answer:  You know, I think this fact stands as a profound indictment of the agency.  For the FBI to disseminate a serious disease to me through a non-conventional vector, and then without my permission, test me for antibodies to that disease, and further, utilize both of those crimes to suggest that my conduct has been anything less than exemplary is a monstrosity.  

It demonstrates a fulminant misogyny within the agency that will be difficult to eradicate, certainly.

4.  How would you choose to characterize your personal life, for those who are wondering?

Answer:  I have had one intimate partner over my lifetime, that of my husband of 34 years.

5.  What about the FBI's claims that one of your family members or you yourself have committed espionage, terrorism, weapons trafficking, drug trafficking, human trafficking, wild animal trafficking, child abuse, elder abuse, animal abuse, spousal abuse or capital crimes?

Answer:  All of those allegations are categorically false and defamatory.

6.  What is your perspective toward those who have defamed you in this manner?

Answer:  They have the option of recanting or being sued.  The truth is non-negotiable.  My conduct stands as a testament to my high character.  I earned that character, and I will not be relinquishing it to false claims.

7.  What about your family members?

Answer:  My husband is a person of very high character as well.  And so were my sons until the FBI and its affiliates darkened their door.

8.  May I ask for more specifics regarding that observation?

Answer:  When my younger son's handler tells him to take hard drugs at a specific gathering as part of an alleged undercover operation for the FBI, then films him doing so, then proceeds to defame him to everyone he meets with that film -- this represents a serious problem of FBI criminal conduct all the way around.  

Similarly, when FBI affiliates direct my older son to move a package from one door in his apartment building to another, filming him doing so, with the intent of accusing him of weapons trafficking and terrorism -- this represents a devastating betrayal of trust.

9.  So, there is a mindset of calculation and entrapment on the part of the FBI.

Answer:  Entrapment is too mild a term for what the FBI is doing in these cases.  The agency is simply confabulating crimes, inventing them, and then directing their real-life perpetration -- in a distorted stage play of real life.

And I would hasten to point out that the forced conscription of the sons and daughter-in-law of a whistleblower of FBI misconduct is completely unethical, and likely unlawful.

The reason for that is that the FBI has a high motivation to harm them in appalling ways.  And it has.

10.  Did your younger son's FBI handler intentionally force him to become addicted at least three times, through directing him in successive "undercover operations" over time?

Answer:  Yes, he did.

11.  And is the FBI now utilizing your younger son's repeated residential treatment for addiction to discredit your family, even though the agency was entirely at fault?

Answer:  This is what is being alleged, yes.

12.  Did the FBI film certain personal surgical procedures of your family members and then utilize those films as a means to defame your family?

Answer:  Yes, I am told this is the case.

13.  Including gynecological care?

Answer:  Yes.

14.  Is it true that the FBI coerced both pregnancy and pregnancy termination in for certain members of your family?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  This FBI coercion was perpetrated under threat of death, so the circumstances represented extreme duress.

15.  And is it true that the FBI has rendered at least one of your children infertile without consent?

Answer:  This is the agency's own assertion, yes.

16.  And this was perpetrated through extremely elevated radiation doses while sleeping?

Answer:  Yes, this is the agency's claim.

17.  Has the FBI rendered all of your children infertile through such intentional acts?

Answer:  This is entirely possible.  I don't know.

18.  And this may have been done as punishment for your revelations of the FBI's gratuitous crimes, separate and apart from mission and objectives, against the American public.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes.

19.  Have your children been raped, trafficked and tortured by the FBI?

Answer:  Yes, they have.

20.  Have they experienced repeated sovereignty violations perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates?

Answer:  Yes, they have.

21.  Have your children, at certain times, lied about your family under torture by the FBI?

Answer:  The FBI itself says they have.

22.  Do you know the content of those lies?

Answer:  I am told that they have run the whole gamut, from lies about owning a copy of The Communist Manifesto, which we don't, to lies about causing harm to others, which stands in direct opposition to our beliefs about the purpose of human society and which we would never do.

23.  Why does the FBI has such an emphasis on scurrilous defamation of its victims?

Answer:  Because the FBI's current ethos is to "disrupt, discredit and divide."  The agency has adopted an approach dictated by our foreign adversaries in many cases.  Extensive defamation, whether with AI-generated material or no, allows the FBI to assume color of authority in implicating virtuous Americans for the agency's own profit, and abstolute control.  Defamation is a primary tool of propagandists, used to stoke fear, hatred, distance, condemnation and violence.

24.  Is the FBI attempting to instigate civil violence?

Answer:  It already has, and I have discussed the specifics elsewhere.  But the FBI has rendered many American communities unsafe and not secure.

25.  You have been careful to say that the FBI must be checked in areas that stand outside of mission and objectives.

Answer:  Yes, I have.  If we don't set these limits, we cannot expect to recover the sovereignty of the nation later.

26.  The FBI has appeared to suggest that a trial is currently underway concerning your family members and yourself.  Have you seen the evidence presented?

Answer:  No, not at all.

27.  You have no idea of the specifics of which you are accused?

Answer:  None.

28.  Does this FBI suggest that that trial, in which you have played no part in your own defense, will be complete by the beginning of July?

Answer:  Yes, it does.

29.  And what will happen then?  Will you be informed of the results?

Answer:  I have certainly requested peaceable, lawful and honorable outreach.  So, I would like to learn the results of the ajudication of this matter.  

30.  If the results were wrongfully condemnatory of one or more of your family members or even you yourself, what would occur?

Answer:  I have a bark scorpion that is not native to my area in Northern California currently in my freezer.  And this is the risk, that a wrongful conviction might result in a fatal scorpion sting, a fatal emergency room encounter, a fatal car accident, without our ever knowing that we have wrongfully been placed on trial for our lives.

31.  And staged "natural disaster," staged gas explosion, remote air bag deployment in your vehicle, other staged car accident, house arson, wildfire -- all of these have long been threatened by the FBI against your family, haven't they?

Answer:  Yes, they have.  In addition, the FBI is threatening to direct forced job loss for my husband and younger son, the obstruction of graduate school admission for my older son, and the killing of my pets through parasites I have already documented for the OIG Hotline.  

Beyond this, the FBI is threatening various forms of financial predation including a spurious lawsuit initiated by my brother Brian Von Herzen, as directed by his handler, as well as fraud perpetrated on my credit card accounts through FBI tampering.  Wrongful IRS audit prompted by the actions of a corrupted tax accountant has also been threatened by the FBI over the last week or so.

32.  Is it extremely hurtful to be preyed upon in this manner when you are a person who loves the United States?

Answer:  It is.  There can be no question about this.  I would like to have the apology from the FBI that is due to my family.  I would like to read the details of this case, as is my right.  But our leadership must be determined to uphold my human rights and those of my family, even in the face of AI-generated propaganda and the wider systems that support them. 

And this requires leadership that understands that the sovereignty of the nation, if sacrificed now, will not be reclaimed at some later time as an afterthought, an appendix, a footnote, or a flourish.

This requires outreach that is, as I said, honorable, peaceable, lawful and benevolent -- prioritizing both the sovereignty of the United States and the long term freedom of mankind that accompanies that sovereignty.

33.  Given that certain individuals in the government could benefit to a total of 9 trillion dollars awarded in your name through falsely accusing you of malfeasance or physically taking your lives, will that outreach be forthcoming?

Answer:  We will see.

34.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.





Lane MacWilliams

Monday, May 26, 2025

The Heroic and Exceptional American Ethos: In Defense of My Brave Sons

1.  Is your sons' sovereignty recoverable?  What are your thoughts about this agonizing issue?  

Answer:  My sons have been separated from their true identities in ways that are devastating and inhuman, and this profound harm has been manifested through repeated sovereignty violations.  

And the truth is, I don't know to what extent their true selves are recoverable.  In addition to repairing the fundamentals of independent decision making, the boundaries of their ethics and principles need to be restored.  They need to remember who they were before all of this harm was perpetrated, and they need to make their way back to their true selves.

Do I think it is possible?  Yes, I believe their true identities are likely in hibernation and can be re-established.  But this will take work, advanced rehabilitation, and dedication.

And I think it must be done.

2.  Why do you feel so strongly about this issue?

Answer:  Individual sovereignty and national sovereignty are linked.  If the individual can defend the boundaries of identity, of personhood, of decision-making, and of the spiritual development that corresponds to all of these, then the nation can defend its sovereignty, too.  It is not too far a reach to say that the freedom of mankind depends upon our success in this realm.  

The sovereignty of the United States is necessary in order for us to emerge from our current challenges as a free people.

So, I want my children's and MX's sovereignty to be restored as proof that it can be done.  What better testament to the restoration of the individual will than the rehabilitation of my beloved family members?

If my sons and MX can be rendered free, truly free, then so can our nation be rendered free, thus allowing humanity itself to insist on the sovereign self-determination that renders the most meaningful human progress possible.

3.  Has the FBI suggested that the agency has been directed to take the lives of your sons?  And if so, why would this be the case?

Answer:  The FBI has, in fact, suggested this.  And it seems clear that the agency wishes to erase the evidence of its own malfeasance regarding my family.  

4.  May I ask what specific threats have been extended?

Answer:  The FBI has suggested that my older son was or is meant to be murdered through a staged suicide involving a train accident.  And it has suggested that my other family members are intended to be murdered through a staged plane crash.

5.  You have received many, many other threats from the FBI pertaining to your family members as well, though.  Isn't that true?

Answer:  Yes, the FBI has threatened to harm my sons through myriad other means, including kidnapping, a forced fall from a height, a staged drug overdose, staged street violence, a staged law enforcement encounter, a staged hit and run, etc.  This list goes on.

Right now, there seems to be a focus for the FBI on ensuring that autopsy would be rendered impossible.  Hence the threats of staged train accident and staged plane crash.

6.  Are these harms within the FBI's capabilities?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Well within their capabilities.  Once substantive sovereignty violations have occurred, it's really possible for the agency to direct a whole panoply of harms that would have been impossible if the individual had maintained access to his or her true self-determination.

To the wider world, nothing has changed.  The individual is walking and talking just as they were before.

But inwardly, there is a supplanting of the sovereign will, the independent self, the ethical reference frame and the moral boundaries that define and guide our decision-making throughout our lives.  So, suddenly, deceit and prevarication are quite easily manifested in someone who may have been scrupulously honest previously.  And, of course, their actions in many other areas of life may reflect that erosion of their fundamental selves as well.  They've lost control of their own actions, even though they appear superficially to be unchanged.  It's difficult to imagine a more disastrous means of harm regarding the freedom of mankind in the long term.

7.  And your point is that if your own sons' sovereignty cannot be reclaimed, if MX's sovereignty cannot be rescued, then it's unlikely the nation's will be either.  Is that correct?

Answer:  It is, yes.  Because I am going public in advocating quite fiercely for their restoration.  I think their stories are necessary for us to hear, including the tremendous challenges they have faced, due to the fact that this sovereignty issue is critical for all of us right now -- as it will be in the future.

8.  May I ask why the FBI seems intent on obviating the possibility of autopsy for your family?  Because it seems to me that this information could be critical in keeping all of you alive.

Answer:  My older son has a pituitary tumor which has neither been diagnosed nor appropriately treated due to the FBI's obstruction of expert medical care.  In addition, he has an implanted communications device which is retrievable, and certainly, this proof would be a major embarrassment to former President Biden.  In addition, he has had a whole series of unnecessary root canals, also due to the improper authorizations of President Biden.   He has anal scarring due to forced human trafficking -- which in every way constitutes forcible rape -- that he has experienced due to the predation of the FBI in complicity with Russian organized crime and, in his case, a mental health care organization in Palo Alto called LaSelva.  And the FBI claims to have intentionally rendered him sterile through targeted irradiation during sleeping hours.

So, all of this and more tells the tale of the FBI's crimes against my older son.  And that's why two Presidents, the FBI, the CIA (which is my older son's agency, technically, although it has been acting in the capacity of FBI contractor in this instance), and numerous affiliates are all very afraid of the truth of this matter being revealed.

The physical evidence is condemnatory of many.  That's the bottom line.

In the case of my younger son, he has, according to the FBI, experienced spinal tumors caused by extremely elevated radiation exposures perpetrated by the agency.  In MX's case, there is breast cancer for the same reason, according to the agency.  And the implanted communications devices are present for both of them as well, together with the unnecessary root canals, anal scarring, potential infertility, and likely a number of other diseases the FBI has threatened all of us with, including HIV, syphilis, HSV2, TB, and more.

I will not mention other foundational changes to health perpetrated by the FBI, but this aspect of FBI harms is discoverable as well.

So, there's a great deal here that is entirely condemnatory of the agency.

And the FBI is simply not accustomed to being held to account.

9.  What are we to make of the FBI's determined human trafficking of your sons and MX, even after you revealed this concern to the OIG Hotline?

Answer:  We are to conclude that this is a horrible problem, not only for my family, but for the nation as a whole.  The FBI is pursuing the human trafficking of the nation's youth with a viciousness and entitlement that demonstrate that the agency is most loyal to our foreign adversaries, not to the United States.  

The FBI thinks it has the right to rape our children, in other words, for pleasure and profit, both.  And it is up to us to stand together to clarify for the agency that on this point it is simply wrong, outrageously wrong, permanently wrong.

If we do not solve the human trafficking of America's youth by the FBI, we will not be capable of defending humanity's sovereignty in the future, on the basis of this one issue alone.

10.  Why?

Answer:  Because repeated rapes are annihilating to anyone.  And if we give federal law enforcement authorities the dispensation to traffic our beloved children, then the future of the United States as a nation is rendered forfeit, as is the future freedom of mankind.  Will there ever come a day when a predatory FBI says "That's enough! Let's not rape the beautiful children of a nation now completely under our control"?  No.  That day will never come.

It's up to us to set those boundaries, and it's up to us to defend them.  And now is the time, not later.

11.  What does it take to defend America's beloved youth?

Answer:  It takes courage, determination, character, and insistence.  You know, I had posted myself on the deck of a LaSelva residence two days ago while my son was inside, so that I could prevent my son from being trafficked again.  And let me tell you, there were ten or twelve attempts, through intimidation, to get me to leave that property.  

And you just hold your ground.  This is your child you're defending.  Hold the line.  Don't give way.  Stand strong.

12.  Were you receiving sniping threats while you were on that deck?

Answer:  Yes, I was.

13.  But you refused to leave.

Answer:  Yes, I refused.  This is my son.  I will protect him with every capability I possess.  And America's sons and daughters deserve as impassioned and heartfelt and immovable a defense.  On this commitment, our entire nation depends, and the fate of many more.

Stand your ground.  Muster your courage.  Hold that line.

14.  What do you make of the FBI's assertions that the U.S. military has played a role in the human trafficking perpetrated by the agency?

Answer:  Our military leaders do not want their own beloved children to be raped and trafficked.  So we need to insist that they defend the beloved children belonging to the nation as a whole.  If our foreign adversaries have coerced certain individuals within our military to involve themselves in human trafficking, we should consider granting immunity to key figures so that we can assess the extent of the compromise.  And then we need to reclaim our sovereignty with all the fortitude we possess, with the military supporting us every step of the way.

This is about real leadership, real character, real force of will regarding the sovereignty of our nation.  So, we need to bring forward all the considerable gifts we possess in solving this problem.

15.  Your unwillingness to leave your sons or MX behind reflects your unwillingness to relinquish the sovereignty of the nation as a whole.  Is that fair to say?

Answer:  It is, yes.  The heroic and exceptional American ethos consists of our deep commitment to defend one another's human rights and free will.  So, I defend my sons with the same courage with which I defend the sons and daughters of the nation.  

16.  How would you characterize that courage?

Answer:  Limitless, just as my love for my own children and the children of this nation is limitless.

17.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.





Lane MacWilliams

Saturday, May 24, 2025

UPDATE: Illuminating Certain Crimes of the FBI Against the MacWilliams Family

UPDATE:  Please note that twice in the dialogue below, the text was altered without my participation or consent to read "the FBI has been threatened," instead of the "the FBI has been threatening," thus changing the entire meaning of the sentence.

To clarify, while the FBI may feel under threat because I am exposing its crimes, I am not threatening the agency.

The only support I wield is the truth.  

By contrast, the FBI continues to both threaten and harm my family members and myself --  physically, through knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting, and through myriad means of obstruction, harassment, and injury.

I have attempted to correct the text of the document below to the original phrasing.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

****************************************************************************

 1.  What does it mean to you when children are asked, under the auspices of government programs, to harm their own parents?

Answer:  Well, it signals a dystopian regime, certainly.  These are crimes that stand as fundamental offenses against our knowledge of right and wrong, our ethics, our humanity, our personhood, and our spiritual standing.

We might see officials in a North Korean gulag trying to convince children to kill their parents.

But we're not accustomed to seeing that kind of conduct in the United States.

We're not used to children being offered billions of dollars by elected officials if they will only kill their own parents.

And we're not used to anyone presenting such atrocities as "for the good of the nation," when the real motive is purely one of profiteering off of first-degree murder.

2.  What is the significance of these directives being extended to young men whose sovereignty has been violated?

Answer:  Well, it's extremely serious to violate someone's sovereign will through repeated rape, trafficking, torture and other harms.  In these cases, the ability of the individual to decide between right and wrong is so eroded as to have been rendered invisible.  The boundaries of the personality have been erased.  So to ask someone who has been so egregiously harmed to commit an atrocity against his own family members is an unconscionable offense.

3.  What happens when a President directs such an offense?

Answer:  What, indeed?

4.  Something similar to the Davies Symphony Hall debacle of several weeks ago?

Answer:  I will leave this to others to consider.  I can simply say as a parent that it was horrifying that my sons were coerced into being part of that attempted assassination.

5.  When the FBI directs sons to murder their parents, does it extend copious disinformation and defamation in that process?

Answer:  I assume so.  I think the FBI is likely saying to the children, "You have experienced torture only because your parents don't care about you." Or "This never would have happened to you without your parents' placing selfish concerns over your own wellbeing."  Meanwhile, the FBI is giving disinformation to the parents by saying "Your children will be relieved when you're dead."  So, they're working both sides as hatefully and viciously as they can, lying with every breath, as far as I can ascertain.

6.  Is it true that the FBI treats the murder of certain "high-value targets" as a game with points and rewards and payoffs along the way?

Answer:  The FBI appears to indicate that it is true, yes.  However, I have made no direct verification of those claims.

7.  And are there special payoffs connected to coercing sons into murdering their parents?

Answer:  I have no doubt that there are.  

8.  What is the amount of money that would render murdering one's own parents a possibility?

Answer:  What is the amount of money that would render relinquishing one's own soul a possibility?  The amount is the same.

9.  What can officials do when they have been caught in a scheme of attempting to murder a virtuous whistleblower for profit?

Answer:  They can apologize through an attorney, which is now necessary.

10.  Doesn't the FBI typically try to implicate family members of murder in schemes like this one, so that no one is left to tell the tale of the agency's predatory crimes?  In other words, doesn't the agency typically coerce adult children into committing unthinkable crimes, and then use those very crimes to justify the agency's harm of the adult children themselves?  

Answer:  Yes, this is exactly the way the agency works.  They promise the adult children billions of dollars, dinners at the White House, a life on private jets.  And then they simply murder them as well.  Right now, the FBI appears to be threatening to murder my sons through staged plane crashes, but they have extended a myriad of other unconscionable methods as well.

11.  Do your sons have any inkling of the way this particular trap works?

Answer:  I don't know, honestly.  Their sovereignty has been so profoundly and repeatedly violated that they may not be able to make use of their knowledge in the course of any important decision-making, even if they were able to perceive the scheme.

12.  You discovered today that your son has been trafficked by the FBI every Saturday afternoon and every Wednesday night for months on end, all while you were communicating your concerns to the OIG Hotline.  Is this correct?

Answer:  Yes, the FBI was using the cover of a mental health organization named LaSelva in Palo Alto in order to traffic my son against his will, a crime that is in all ways equivalent to rape.

13.  And you discovered this by remaining present at LaSelva's hosting of a Settlers of Catan game this afternoon.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes, it is.

14.  How aggressively did the FBI attempt to force you to leave the property?

Answer:  They engaged in active harassment over the course of more than two hours, asking me to move my car, directing LaSelva employees and LaSelva patients to repeatedly crowd my perfectly peaceful and quiet perch on an outdoor deck.

15.  Were all of these people later coerced by the FBI into providing knowingly false witness statements?

Answer:  Oh, I have no doubt about that coercion whatsoever.  I did document the entire afternoon, however, should the OIG Hotline request it.  So, there can be no objective dispute about the facts.

16.  So, if the FBI directs people to claim that you were inebriated or behaving inappropriately?

Answer:  I can easily prove them to be liars.  But again, this is why we allow American citizens, according to the Constitution, to know what charges have been extended against them.  People need to have the opportunity to rebut false claims, and false complainants need to be charged for lying to the Court, just as the FBI handlers who directed them to lie need to be charged.

17.  Would your son have been trafficked today if the FBI's manipulations had succeeded in forcing you to leave the LaSelva property? 

Answer:  I'm certain he would.  The FBI has no shame in this regard whatsoever.  These personnel treat their victims as targets to be aimed at and destroyed.  They exhibit no humanity, connection, compassion or wisdom whatsoever.  These are not the people we want to be running the nation and certainly not international affairs.

18.  You believe the FBI is acting in treasonous ways in trafficking America's youth?

Answer:  Treason is a gentle word for what the FBI has perpetrated, in my opinion.

19.  How can you reclaim your family, your access to legal representation, your human rights, your health, and your future?

Answer:  By speaking about certain of the FBI's atrocities until someone will listen.

Does anyone care about the FBI's willful and predatory trafficking of America's youth?

If we care about anything beyond ourselves, we have to care about this.

20.  What are we to make of the FBI's extraordinary crimes in tunneling under your home through unlawful access created at your neighbors Ron and Rhonda Hyvers' property?  Didn't you find an access door in the retaining wall of their driveway that leads to an extraordinary depth, from which this entirely improper excavation was completed at enormous expense?

Answer:  Yes, I did.

21.  What does that door look like?

Answer:  It looks like this photograph, which I took with the realtor's permission:


22.  And it's on the basis of this excavation project that the FBI has been threatening to cause "earthquake," "landslide" "sinkhole," "eruption," and even non-natural disasters like "gas explosion" at your home, isn't it?  All with the reported objective of perpetrating first-degree murder for profit?

Answer:  Yes, that's correct.  The FBI has even threatened "meteor fall" in addition to all the harms you mentioned above as a means of obscuring its crimes toward my property.  

So, it's hard to imagine a more serious circumstance.  And the FBI is entirely and completely at fault.

23.  Didn't the FBI lie to the OIG Hotline when concerns of malfeasance were raised during the construction of this driveway at the Hyvers?

Answer:  I believe the FBI did lie about this subject to both the OIG Hotline and the Supreme Court, yes.

24.  What are the consequences when the San Jose Chief of Station of the FBI lies to the OIG Hotline and the Supreme Court?

Answer:  That's an excellent question.  Clearly, there should be criminal charges regarding this instance.

25.  Who approved the "Big Dig" underneath your property -- as the FBI likes to call it?

Answer:  This excavation occurred during the Biden administration.  So, this is a critical question for us to clarify, certainly.

26.  Was President Biden profiteering from awards extended in your name while he had authorized an excavation deep underneath your property, as overseen by a corrupt FBI?

Answer:  This appears to be exactly what he did, yes.

27.  How do you feel about the political parties now?

Answer:  People need to be directly asked about their reasoning and their circumstances given actions that seem incomprehensible.  We need to try to fully comprehend what was going through their minds, whether they were profiting from causing gratuitous and unjustifiable harm, whether they made repeated decisions over time to cause gratuitous and unjustifiable harm -- all of this and more.

Political parties are made up of individuals, so it's critical that we not begin to assume that all people are alike or indistinguishable.

When we protect American sovereignty, we are saying that we want individual Americans to make their own choices between right and wrong, and further, that we want them to maintain accountability for those choices.

So we need to ask for these answers and we need to do so with courage, no matter what the answers might be.

28.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening, despite these extraordinary circumstances caused by FBI malfeasance.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

29.  Please maintain your safety and that of your family members as well.

Answer:  Thank you for your good wishes.








Lane MacWilliams

Request for the Invention of the OIG Hotline If Appropriate

 OIG Hotline, both of my sons and/or MX may be experiencing coercion regarding the signing of settlement agreements at this time that would permanently undermine my family, preventing us from openly acknowledging to each other in a private context the egregious harms that have been perpetrated against us by the FBI and its affiliates.

I most strenuously object to this attempt, should it be occurring, and request your support in preventing all such settlements and agreements from being extended, signed or settled by my sons and/or MX.

Thank you for your active intervention in this matter should this coercion be occurring.

Most sincerely,





Lane MacWilliams


Monday, May 19, 2025

Severe Sovereignty Violation Against Lane MacWilliams, May 19, 2025

 OIG Hotline, I experienced a severe sovereignty violation last night during an unscheduled PG&E power outage at my home.

Without going into too many details, this appears to be a jxxxx deployment, significantly more severe than a previous deployment about which I wrote to your Office.  The FBI appears to allege that there are different "types of jxxxxxx," which exert differing levels of influence over decision making and free will.

I do not have enough knowledge of the course of this assault to be able to accurately predict its course over time, nor whether I can maintain my independent thought in the face of this astonishing violation.

I do not not have sufficient information about how to become free from this sovereignty violation, nor the previous one.  Nor do I have sufficient information about how to free my family members from parallel sovereignty violations which have dramatically harmed their lives.

Accordingly, my judgment allows me only to know that my judgment is impaired, but not to assess to what degree.

This constitutes an FBI deployment, perpetrated with DoD assistance, and authorized by the White House.

All of these facts are deeply disappointing.

In light of what is likely to be my increasingly impaired judgement over time, and lacking any outreach which could assist me in decisively recovering my full sovereignty on an immediate basis. I am electing to submit a formal complaint to your Office through your Office's online portal regarding recent issues of concern.  That confirmed complaint will be forwarded to you through email so that you have a verified copy of its contents.

I am fully aware that the submission of this complaint may cost me my life.

However, I view sovereignty violations of the kind currently being perpetrated by the FBI to represent a diminishment akin to death of the individual identity.  This constitutes a diminishment of humanity that is so egregious and far-reaching, the long term enslavement of the human will of all of us will mean a grievous and likely irreversible loss to the potential of mankind in the longterm.

I most heartily object.

That the FBI would subject me to this sovereignty violation knowing my dedicated advocacy for the human rights of others points out the fundamental problem of the FBI's malevolence, ill will, irresponsibility, thievery, harm and murder of its betters, alongside its treason toward the United States.

We will not rescue the sovereignty of mankind in the long term if we cannot speak about it now.

And no one has extended the appropriate respect, honor and lawfulness regarding my case to reach out to me directly and express "this is wrong."

And, good people, it is wrong.

Some within the United States have chosen to profiteer from the torture of the virtuous public, and that will never be acceptable.

I do not believe that the FBI should be raping and trafficking America's children, that the FBI should be violating the separation of Church and State in its attempt to undermine America's houses of worship, that the FBI should be despoiling America's irreplaceable landscapes at the directive of our foreign adversaries, or that the FBI should be violating the integrity of the United States' military chain of command.  

Nor should the FBI be violating the sovereignty of free American citizens like my children, my husband and myself.

I am no less than horrified that the decision was made to violate my sovereignty last night, in what is tantamount to a declaration of war against my efforts to protect the long term freedom of mankind and the sovereignty of the nation as a whole.

Others should be horrified alongside me.

The FBI, the DoD, and the White House need to reverse course regarding this matter, and they need to do so immediately.

Most sincerely,





Lane MacWilliams

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Update. : A Tour of My Neighbors' Property at 55 Vista Verde Way, Portola Valley

Update: 2:00 PM on Sunday, May 18, 2025

This tour was successfully completed, with details forwarded to the OIG Hotline.

Most sincerely,





Lane MacWilliams

********************************************************************************


Update:  OIG Hotline, please be apprised that, immediately in advance of my tour of 55 Vista Verde Way, I am in receipt of apparent kidnapping threats from the FBI or its affiliates.

Alongside this are apparent threats of staged "natural disaster" or gas explosion at the neighbors' home I will be touring.

I will follow up with you immediately following completion of this visit.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams

***************************************************************************


I have requested to tour the property of Ron and Rhonda Hyver, which is currently for sale, through Zillow-affiliated Compass realtors Andrew Oldham and Brandon Stovall, tomorrow, Sunday, May 18, 2025 at 1:00 PM Pacific time.

In the meantime, I have asked these realtors to provide me with the full disclosures document pertaining to this property.

While the FBI appears to be claiming that this information is classified, I, as a potential buyer, have every right to access the full document.

The agency appears to suggest that Txx Lxxxx has initiated this sale of the Hyver's property to the FBI or an FBI affiliate in order to conceal the FBI's environmental crimes toward the entire neighborhood.

Note that, despite my repeated requests for outreach regarding my own despoiled land, the FBI has extended no communication to me whatsoever.

What am I to make of the FBI's mounting threats to take my life between now and tomorrow afternoon, or to take my life while I am touring the Hyvers' property?

This appears to be an entirely consistent response for a murderous, thieving and defamatory institution, disloyal to the United States, one which willing and eager to despoil our sovereign territory for personal gain and individual avarice.

Americans have a right to demand more from the FBI than FBI personnel's current role as Vladimir Putin's conscienceless and treasonous henchmen.

The nation deserves vastly better conduct.

I will be reporting back here, assuming our corrupt, disloyal FBI allows me to live that long, about my tour of my neighbors' property tomorrow afternoon.

Most sincerely,





Lane MacWilliams