My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Thursday, May 29, 2025

A Response to the FBI's Defamation Toward My Family

 1.  You and your family are receiving threats from the FBI of the conveyance of chronic or acute disease through a non-conventional vector.  Is that correct?

Answer:  Yes, I am.  Threats include MS, ALS, dementia of various etiologies, cancer, HIV, syphilis, on and on.

2.  You have no risk factors for HIV or syphilis.  Is that true?

Answer:  That is true, yes.  No risk factors whatsoever.  But that does not prevent the FBI from conveying a whole panoply of diseases to my family members and myself as its "targets of interest."

3.  The FBI appears to enjoy impugning the upstanding character of its "targets" such as yourself by using the presence of antibodies as a tool of defamation.  Have you been informed of this?

Answer:  You know, I think this fact stands as a profound indictment of the agency.  For the FBI to disseminate a serious disease to me through a non-conventional vector, and then without my permission, test me for antibodies to that disease, and further, utilize both of those crimes to suggest that my conduct has been anything less than exemplary is a monstrosity.  

It demonstrates a fulminant misogyny within the agency that will be difficult to eradicate, certainly.

4.  How would you choose to characterize your personal life, for those who are wondering?

Answer:  I have had one intimate partner over my lifetime, that of my husband of 34 years.

5.  What about the FBI's claims that one of your family members or you yourself have committed espionage, terrorism, weapons trafficking, drug trafficking, human trafficking, wild animal trafficking, child abuse, elder abuse, animal abuse, spousal abuse or capital crimes?

Answer:  All of those allegations are categorically false and defamatory.

6.  What is your perspective toward those who have defamed you in this manner?

Answer:  They have the option of recanting or being sued.  The truth is non-negotiable.  My conduct stands as a testament to my high character.  I earned that character, and I will not be relinquishing it to false claims.

7.  What about your family members?

Answer:  My husband is a person of very high character as well.  And so were my sons until the FBI and its affiliates darkened their door.

8.  May I ask for more specifics regarding that observation?

Answer:  When my younger son's handler tells him to take hard drugs at a specific gathering as part of an alleged undercover operation for the FBI, then films him doing so, then proceeds to defame him to everyone he meets with that film -- this represents a serious problem of FBI criminal conduct all the way around.  

Similarly, when FBI affiliates direct my older son to move a package from one door in his apartment building to another, filming him doing so, with the intent of accusing him of weapons trafficking and terrorism -- this represents a devastating betrayal of trust.

9.  So, there is a mindset of calculation and entrapment on the part of the FBI.

Answer:  Entrapment is too mild a term for what the FBI is doing in these cases.  The agency is simply confabulating crimes, inventing them, and then directing their real-life perpetration -- in a distorted stage play of real life.

And I would hasten to point out that the forced conscription of the sons and daughter-in-law of a whistleblower of FBI misconduct is completely unethical, and likely unlawful.

The reason for that is that the FBI has a high motivation to harm them in appalling ways.  And it has.

10.  Did your younger son's FBI handler intentionally force him to become addicted at least three times, through directing him in successive "undercover operations" over time?

Answer:  Yes, he did.

11.  And is the FBI now utilizing your younger son's repeated residential treatment for addiction to discredit your family, even though the agency was entirely at fault?

Answer:  This is what is being alleged, yes.

12.  Did the FBI film certain personal surgical procedures of your family members and then utilize those films as a means to defame your family?

Answer:  Yes, I am told this is the case.

13.  Including gynecological care?

Answer:  Yes.

14.  Is it true that the FBI coerced both pregnancy and pregnancy termination in for certain members of your family?

Answer:  Yes, it is.  This FBI coercion was perpetrated under threat of death, so the circumstances represented extreme duress.

15.  And is it true that the FBI has rendered at least one of your children infertile without consent?

Answer:  This is the agency's own assertion, yes.

16.  And this was perpetrated through extremely elevated radiation doses while sleeping?

Answer:  Yes, this is the agency's claim.

17.  Has the FBI rendered all of your children infertile through such intentional acts?

Answer:  This is entirely possible.  I don't know.

18.  And this may have been done as punishment for your revelations of the FBI's gratuitous crimes, separate and apart from mission and objectives, against the American public.  Is that the case?

Answer:  Yes.

19.  Have your children been raped, trafficked and tortured by the FBI?

Answer:  Yes, they have.

20.  Have they experienced repeated sovereignty violations perpetrated by the FBI and its affiliates?

Answer:  Yes, they have.

21.  Have your children, at certain times, lied about your family under torture by the FBI?

Answer:  The FBI itself says they have.

22.  Do you know the content of those lies?

Answer:  I am told that they have run the whole gamut, from lies about owning a copy of The Communist Manifesto, which we don't, to lies about causing harm to others, which stands in direct opposition to our beliefs about the purpose of human society and which we would never do.

23.  Why does the FBI has such an emphasis on scurrilous defamation of its victims?

Answer:  Because the FBI's current ethos is to "disrupt, discredit and divide."  The agency has adopted an approach dictated by our foreign adversaries in many cases.  Extensive defamation, whether with AI-generated material or no, allows the FBI to assume color of authority in implicating virtuous Americans for the agency's own profit, and abstolute control.  Defamation is a primary tool of propagandists, used to stoke fear, hatred, distance, condemnation and violence.

24.  Is the FBI attempting to instigate civil violence?

Answer:  It already has, and I have discussed the specifics elsewhere.  But the FBI has rendered many American communities unsafe and not secure.

25.  You have been careful to say that the FBI must be checked in areas that stand outside of mission and objectives.

Answer:  Yes, I have.  If we don't set these limits, we cannot expect to recover the sovereignty of the nation later.

26.  The FBI has appeared to suggest that a trial is currently underway concerning your family members and yourself.  Have you seen the evidence presented?

Answer:  No, not at all.

27.  You have no idea of the specifics of which you are accused?

Answer:  None.

28.  Does this FBI suggest that that trial, in which you have played no part in your own defense, will be complete by the beginning of July?

Answer:  Yes, it does.

29.  And what will happen then?  Will you be informed of the results?

Answer:  I have certainly requested peaceable, lawful and honorable outreach.  So, I would like to learn the results of the ajudication of this matter.  

30.  If the results were wrongfully condemnatory of one or more of your family members or even you yourself, what would occur?

Answer:  I have a bark scorpion that is not native to my area in Northern California currently in my freezer.  And this is the risk, that a wrongful conviction might result in a fatal scorpion sting, a fatal emergency room encounter, a fatal car accident, without our ever knowing that we have wrongfully been placed on trial for our lives.

31.  And staged "natural disaster," staged gas explosion, remote air bag deployment in your vehicle, other staged car accident, house arson, wildfire -- all of these have long been threatened by the FBI against your family, haven't they?

Answer:  Yes, they have.  In addition, the FBI is threatening to direct forced job loss for my husband and younger son, the obstruction of graduate school admission for my older son, and the killing of my pets through parasites I have already documented for the OIG Hotline.  

Beyond this, the FBI is threatening various forms of financial predation including a spurious lawsuit initiated by my brother Brian Von Herzen, as directed by his handler, as well as fraud perpetrated on my credit card accounts through FBI tampering.  Wrongful IRS audit prompted by the actions of a corrupted tax accountant has also been threatened by the FBI over the last week or so.

32.  Is it extremely hurtful to be preyed upon in this manner when you are a person who loves the United States?

Answer:  It is.  There can be no question about this.  I would like to have the apology from the FBI that is due to my family.  I would like to read the details of this case, as is my right.  But our leadership must be determined to uphold my human rights and those of my family, even in the face of AI-generated propaganda and the wider systems that support them. 

And this requires leadership that understands that the sovereignty of the nation, if sacrificed now, will not be reclaimed at some later time as an afterthought, an appendix, a footnote, or a flourish.

This requires outreach that is, as I said, honorable, peaceable, lawful and benevolent -- prioritizing both the sovereignty of the United States and the long term freedom of mankind that accompanies that sovereignty.

33.  Given that certain individuals in the government could benefit to a total of 9 trillion dollars awarded in your name through falsely accusing you of malfeasance or physically taking your lives, will that outreach be forthcoming?

Answer:  We will see.

34.  Thank you for sharing your insights with us this morning.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.





Lane MacWilliams

No comments:

Post a Comment