1. What happened yesterday afternoon when you went to your son's apartment in Palo Alto?
Answer: I came across two Amazon packages left in the hallway in front of a neighbor's apartment, and I photographed them.
2. Were those packages significant?
Answer: They were, yes, because they were addressed to a fake name under which an FBI affiliate had rented the apartment, and further, they were packages that my son's handler was directing him to move from one place to another without his ever knowing their contents.
3. Has the FBI falsely accused your son of "weapons trafficking" for following such directives in the past?
Answer: The FBI appears to allege so, yes. The agency also appears to allege that it has falsely accused him of involvement in a terrorist plot of some kind that the agency itself has concocted together with its affiliate agencies, and specifically the CIA.
4. Is the FBI functioning as a kind of arsonist/fire fighter with regard to this situation?
Answer: It absolutely is, and I think it's an important observation to say that the FBI and its affiliates are acting as the arsonist/firefighter with regard to the majority of terrorist actions within the United States. They are creating false narratives of crimes that don't exist without agency directives, and they are forcing related misconduct by innocent people who are in fear for their lives.
5. Like both of your sons and MX.
Answer: Like both of my sons and MX, yes.
6. And, to be clear, they are in fear for their lives because their own handlers are threatening their lives directly.
Answer: Yes.
7. Is the FBI causing public terror within the United States in other ways currently?
Answer: The FBI, through sovereignty violations, is causing a certain percentage of the incidents of public violence that we see in the news every day. What percentage remains unclear, but there is a direct link.
8. Is the FBI causing a majority of incidents of public violence?
Answer: It seems clear that the FBI is causing the vast majority of these incidents, yes.
9. Do you believe the FBI has been involved in past terrorist incidents within the United States?
Answer: The FBI actively targeted the agent who publicly complained that her warnings about two hijackers went unheeded in advance of 9/11.
Now, a substantive part of 9/11 litigation is frozen in the court system, seemingly unable to advance to a definitive verdict.
10. Will verdicts regarding ultimate responsibility for 9/11 ever be reached?
Answer: Absolutely not.
11. Why?
Answer: Because the FBI and the CIA were centrally involved in the planning of 9/11, and the courts don't know how to address that treasonous reality. The FBI and the CIA, behind closed doors, argue to various judges that this is a "national security matter." And it is, but not in the way they mean.
The fact is that the FBI and the CIA are acting at the bidding of the foreign adversaries of the United States, and Russia chief among them, to cause public suffering and disorder in ways that are completely outside of any mission and objectives the agencies possess.
This is a sovereignty issue.
The FBI and the CIA are violating the national sovereignty requirements of the United States in planning and executing terrorist actions against the American public.
It's as simple and as complicated as that.
12. Has the FBI claimed to you that it is involved in planning for the use of a radiological or chemical weapons assault on San Francisco or an EMP assault affecting San Francisco?
Answer: Many times.
13. Is your view that the agency is serious about this?
Answer: Oh, yes. The FBI is very serious about causing terrorist harm to San Francisco.
14. What is your personal perspective on this?
Answer: I think it's outrageous, and I think the American people will find it outrageous as well.
15. Who is directly responsible for engaging in these plans?
Answer: Txx Lxxxx and Bxxxxxx Pxxx for starters.
16. Are these men under the control of Vladimir Putin in directing harm against the United States?
Answer: This is what we need to ascertain. The Joint Committee needs the opportunity to plan for the defense of the nation in a manner that reclaims the national sovereignty of which we have all been deprived for far too long.
17. Is it too far a reach to say that your own son's life might have been rendered forfeit if he had visited his apartment alone yesterday, without your presence and documentation?
Answer: Absolutely not. There are many people who are frightened of the truth of FBI and FBI-affiliate abuse of my sons' and MX's human rights. These people are seeking to silence my loved ones in any way they can.
18. Who approved of this latest scheme of false reporting against your older son? Was that approved by the White House? By Elon Musk? Where did that order come from?
Answer: You're asking an important question, and I think it's one that should be publicly answered.
19. Your sons' and MX's names all need to come off of the agencies' targeting lists, don't they? And don't all of them require honorable discharge?
Answer: Yes, and yes.
20. Does your family require dispensation to speak openly among yourselves, at the very least in a private setting, about the human rights abuses that the FBI and its affiliates have perpetrated against you?
Answer: This is absolutely necessary for our recovery, without question.
21. Have you received appropriate outreach regarding your case as of this time?
Answer: I have not.
22. Given your recent revelations of unlawful actions by the FBI and the CIA against your family and against the nation as a whole, will that now be forthcoming?
Answer: There are many reasons why this outreach should occur immediately, and I hope it does.
23. You have made the argument that the reclaimed sovereignty of the United States is necessary for the preservation of the freedom of mankind over the longterm.
Answer: Yes, I have. And that link has never been more clear. In the longterm, none of us wants to be enduring under a murderous and predatory police state, and we don't want our family members to run that gauntlet either.
Yet, if we don't rescue the sovereignty of the United States at this juncture, that's exactly what we will experience.
Individual human sovereignty and national sovereignty are linked for us. Without one, we cannot have the other.
24. Why is this the case?
Answer: Because no nation is free if to speak the wrong word or to think the wrong thought is to suffer assassination at the hands of unjust authority.
At that point, national defense becomes meaningless, because there is no freedom left to protect.
So, our decision point for the future course of human civilization is now, not later.
If we want to emerge from our current global crisis as a free people, we need to make that commitment at this time and we need to make it publicly.
25. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment