A Foundation for the Ages

 1.  What are the potential impediments to conserving funds awarded to you to date in a foundation as you have specified earlier today?

Answer:  The biggest impediment that I can perceive is that the FBI appears to be directing falsifications of my name change application at the Coconino County Superior Court.  When I checked on Wednesday of this week to ensure that all was in order, the Court Clerk, Diana Morales, discovered that my middle name and my first name at birth had been transposed.  So, instead of Carol Elaine, it was Elaine Carol.

2.  Would your name change application have been approved with that inserted error?

Answer:  No, it would not.  

And now the FBI alleges that intentional misspellings have been inserted into the application at agency directive.

3.  Can you see the application online?

Answer:  I can see that it exists, but I am not being allowed to access the file as it currently stands.  So, I cannot check for errors and omissions, a problem which I'm sure is intentional.  And, interestingly, the file comes up under the correct spelling and name on my birth certificate, so it is clear that errors are being inserted after the fact within the Court Clerk's Office at the directive of an outside authority.

4.  Are there other errors and omissions?

Answer:  It seems that my passport documentation is intentionally being withheld from the case information by the Court Clerks, despite my repeated requests that it be included.  But there could be an infinite number of other errors.  My mailing address could have been falsified .  My social security number could have been falsified.  On and on.

5.  What is the greatest risk with the FBI's corrupting your application in this manner?

Answer: The greatest risk is that the FBI will wrongfully claim that my application is fraudulent on the basis of uncorrected errors for which the FBI itself is entirely responsible.  A knowingly fraudulent filing with any court is no doubt a felony, which would allow the FBI to achieve its goal of misappropriating all awards in my name or associated with my identity.

6.  So the whole purpose of the FBI's falsifying your name change application is the misappropriation of financial awards extended to you because of the FBI's prior crimes against you?

Answer:  This would appear to be the case, yes.

7.  Who is responsible for this malfeasance?  Who is authorizing it?

Answer:  An authorization such as this would need to come from the Executive Branch.

8.  Yet, if this scheme were to be successfully perpetrated, this would amount to criminal malfeasance, would it not?  And it would, in and of itself, represent fraudulent FBI conduct, would it not?

Answer:  Yes, and yes.

9. Will you be able to thwart this plan of misconduct by the agency and its close affiliates?

Answer:  I would hope that this conversation would effectively thwart any such approach, yes.  Obviously, my application to legally change my name to my married name should be approved without delay, misrepresentation, or defamation of any kind.

I have communicated all information at my disposal to the Superior Court, and this documentation should be immediately incorporated and the file updated accordingly.

10.  How long should it take for the Coconino Superior Court to approve your name change?

Answer:  Four to ten working days, and we're already five working days into that schedule.

11.  Have you offered to speak to the presiding judge regarding your case?

Answer:  Yes, of course.

12.  So, the real problem is obstruction by the FBI, not any obstacles that are being independently introduced by Court personnel without FBI guidance.

Answer:  That is correct.

13.  What made you decide to dedicate all funds awarded to you to date, aside from those you have already designated to certain causes, to a foundation?

Answer:  You know, I was waiting and hoping for outreach of an honorable kind, which would have been best.  The crimes against my family and myself have been so egregious that I have very much wanted a formal acknowledgment of those wrongs, and, along with that, an extensive apology.

Finally, I realized that that necessary and overdue apology was never going to come.

And, I must say, I have been in a situation like this once before in my life -- where an apology was due to me right at the moment that extraordinary new demands were being made of me.  And then, as now, I realized that I was never going to hear the words I needed to hear.  And this, for those who are curious, related to an issue of alcoholism -- which is not an issue from which I have ever suffered, thankfully.

14.  How did you respond when you realized the apology would not be forthcoming?

Answer:  There was deep and indelible disappointment, I must say.  And it's important to allow yourself to acknowledge how difficult that territory is.  It's important to grieve the conversation that was not rendered possible.

Then, after that, you have to decide what you're going to do about it.

15.  May I ask you to be more specific?

Answer:  You need to ask yourself what is the greatest good that can possibly come from the situation and then you need to assess whether you are strong enough to manifest that greatest good.

16.  To what extent does the greatest good depend on the strength of one's character?

Answer:  One hundred percent.  If you have the highest character possible, you are capable of manifesting the greatest good.  You just have to comprehend that unassailable path forward.

17.  Is your choice to place funds awarded to you in this case to date a manifestation of that greatest good?

Answer:  Yes, because without the defense offered by a foundation's legal shield, the funds will be stolen fairly promptly.  And this much has become all too clear.  

The funds are intended for the preservation of Americans' sovereignty and the independence of the nation on which that sovereignty depends. If they are misappropriated by those who oppose human sovereignty, then we will have placed the American public in a terrible position going forward -- one in which their freedoms cannot be realistically defended because the vast wealth of a few individuals has rendered profiteers considerably more powerful than the United States itself.

The future of American sovereignty must be assiduously defended, and that's what the structure of a foundation will provide.

18.  Are you depending on the DOJ's OIG Hotline to establish this foundation at your request?

Answer:  Yes, I am.  And I hope it will be a foundation for the ages.

19.  And are you depending on them to ensure that all legal requirements of the foundation will be upheld in the future?

Answer:  Yes, I will need that legal due diligence through time.

20.  Are you hoping that outreach will follow this decision of the funds' allocation?

Answer:  I always believe that the greatest good can be achieved with optimal communication, so yes, of course, I hope for outreach.

21.  Will the OIG Hotline be able to move forward rapidly with this request on your behalf?

Answer:  I have every confidence that they will, yes.

22.  Will you please keep in close communication with us, given the current threats to your safety and that of your loved ones?

Answer:  Yes, of course.

23.  Thank you for speaking with us this evening.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams