My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.




Saturday, June 20, 2026

The FBI's Use of AI to Harm a Human Rights Advocate

1.  You have been evaluating national debt cycles, alongside the current fiscal solvency issues for the United States.  Is that correct?

Answer:  That process is ongoing, but I am looking at the macroeconomic picture, yes.

2.  Do you welcome input regarding different perspectives on our current financial circumstances as well as financial models for the future?

Answer:  Absolutely.   I would hope to take in as much information as possible.

3.  Are you able to share anything with us so far regarding your evaluation?

Answer:  Putting deficits aside for the moment, there are two widely divergent views of our long term economic future.  One of them involves a guaranteed minimum income for American citizens and the other involves a discontinuation of all federal and likely state entitlement programs.  

The problem for us resides in the fact that both models likely sacrifice human sovereignty.  Both structures see AI as dominant over human society in the future.  And both paradigms have difficulty in preserving what is most unique, irreplaceable and worthy within human civilization, which is the fundamental freedom of the individual in thought, speech, reading, association with others, private property, journalism, privacy, voting, and more.

In other words, when AI is aggregating all human communications, with the intelligence agencies "curating" that material, the result is necessarily dystopian no matter what the economic models look like.

4.  May I ask why?

Answer:  Because the dossiers on each individual American, and, indeed, each individual citizen around the world, will be (redacted content).  And the particular contents in each case will allow human beings to be categorized by political views, race, ethnicity, personal orientation, religion, gender, affiliations, genetics, expressed views, and more.

And I need to make clear that "more," in this case is the whole world of (redacted content).

5.  Does the ascendance of AI lead us inevitably to totalitarian governance?

Answer:  AI will be used as the tool for ensuring that individuals demonstrate compliance in every setting, and the "national security" agencies will be enforcing that submission across the board.  So, yes, most of the arguments about AI that we see currently expressed in the public sphere are focusing on the wrong problems with AI's accelerating advancement. In answer to your question, "total information awareness," which AI directly facilitates, does lead to totalitarian governance under all circumstances, yes.

6.  May I ask why?

Answer:  Because even if we leave aside AI's profound tendencies to confabulate, human beings are imperfect.  

When 98-year-old Mrs. McGillicuddy places her diamonds under her pillow at night, the FBI will know about it, and so will the local police department, which communicates freely with the FBI.  Under the circumstances, how long do we think it will take before Mrs. McGillicuddy mysteriously misplaces her family heirlooms?

This is a very elementary example of potential predatory misconduct on the part of law enforcement.  I would hasten to point out that there are myriad situations that are much, much more perilous.

Fundamentally, when we allow an agency -- any agency -- to surveil the minutest detail of the American public and to do so in concealment, we will ultimately confront a totalitarian regime.

Secrecy is inimical to democracy.  So if we want long term human sovereignty, we need to change the architecture of the national security agencies by ensuring there are many more checks and balances in place.

7.  The Constitution does not address the national security agencies as a fourth branch of government.

Answer:  No, it does not.  I am not permitted to speak to the specifics of Constitutional changes that might be considered, due to my foundation work.  But it's fair to say that the Founders did not foresee our current predicament.

8.  How have you yourself suffered from the advancement of AI modalities?

Answer:  This is an excellent question.  The FBI has broadly defamed me with AI-generated films that reportedly show me abusing underage victims -- minors -- through both sexual predation and through violence.

None of my FOIA requests or state information requests have been fulfilled, so I have never had the opportunity to view this false documentation.

But I can tell you that the results of this defamation are profound, tragic, and devastating in every regard.

9.  How so?

Answer:  Aside from pure defamation, the FBI uses this material to inflame a murderous rage in contractors who have been directed to cause me physical harm, even lethal harm.  So the existence of this AI-generated material, in the hands of the FBI, places my life at risk every single day, whether in public or private.

And I need to express that it is quite something to be ragefully targeted on the basis of a crime or crimes one has never committed and would never commit.

When a man you don't know is treating you, as a highly honorable American, with hatred, this is a palpable and visceral experience, whether violence is perpetrated or not.

10.  Can you give us some examples of these astonishing violations by the FBI?

Answer:  Certainly.  My current upstairs neighbor, in apartment #262 of Aura Apartments in Flagstaff, currently spends a good part of the day and night dragging a hundred pound (redacted content) to a position directly above my location in order to cause me physical harm, with apparent threats by the FBI of dementia, heart attack, kidney failure, and more.  The repositioning of this device is loud enough to be clearly audible with each and every location change.  "Txxxxxxx," as he calls himself, has almost certainly seen the FBI's AI-generated films.  This young man thinks he's being just and patriotic in attempting to assassinate me at Executive directive.  So, this is one appalling set of violations.

Separate from this, the FBI has contracted with at least two Venezuelan gang members to take my life later this afternoon at a PetCo in Flagstaff, during a training session for my dogs -- this, through the use of a firearm.

These young men visited PetCo last Saturday, June 13, 2026 and circled the training enclosure several times in a manner that was highly predatory, with expressions of pure hatred on their faces the entire time as they were focused on my location.

These young men have allegedly been promised immigration favors by the FBI if they fulfill the "contract" as specified.

I guarantee that both of them have seen AI-generated films bearing my likeness, depicting me engaged in conduct I would never perpetrate in a million years.

So, defamation by the FBI is not benign, and it is not intended to be benign.

11.  Why is the FBI making this horrific information available to certain viewers?

Answer:  Because Txx Lxxxx, a highly placed FBI employee, allegedly directed a series of capital crimes associated with one or more of my properties.

At this point, if he is not to be held accountable for those crimes, which stand completely separate and apart from the FBI's mission and objectives, he needs to present false evidence to a court and obtain a capital sentence without my opportunity to defend myself.

In fact, these events have already occurred, which is the reason for the astonishing aggression by "Txxxxxxx," as well as the planned aggression by the two Venezuelan men.

The FBI cannot assassinate anyone without having conducted a concealed judicial proceeding in which they are found "guilty" of a serious crime.

And this is what has happened as of this time.

12.  So, Txx Lxxxx appears to be endeavoring to avoid accountability for his own crimes against your family by corrupting the judicial system in all kinds of totalitarian ways.

Answer:  Yes.

13.  Is there a profit motive involved in Txx Lxxxx' ongoing crimes against you and your family members?

Answer:  Oh, yes.  Most assuredly.  Txx Lxxxx, Bxxxxxx Pxxx, certain elected officials, Vladimir Putin, A., and others would profiteer to vast degree if these false accusations resulted in my incapacity or demise.

14.  The FBI has effectively told you to no longer speak in public about your family's victimization at the hands of the agency, as well as to no longer reference your own.  

Answer:  Well, yes, Txx Lxxxx would like to clap his hand over the mouths of his victims, that's true.

That proposition doesn't work for me.  Mr. Lxxxx is going to have to acknowledge his crimes against my family, either publicly or privately, but to my satisfaction.

And that hasn't happened yet.

15.  What should happen to the wealth that Txx Lxxxx and others have misappropriated through the full course of your case?

Answer:  Those assets need to be recovered and deposited in the foundation for the long term human sovereignty of Americans, as I have specified.  On top of that, there should be generous penalties that will garnish the income of Mr. Lxxxx and others in perpetuity.

16.  Do you authorize an immediate appeal regarding Txx Lxxxx' wrongful acts against your family and yourself, in addition to the corrupted judicial proceedings that followed?

Answer:  I do.

17.  Do you authorize civil suits against Txx Lxxxx, Bxxxxxx Pxxx and those who authorized wrongful aggression against your loved ones, including your pets and yourself?

Answer:  I do.

18.  Do you authorize international courts to prosecute Vladimir Putin, A., any Chinese personnel, and others involved in the abuses of this case with a view toward recollecting misappropriated funds to be deposited within the foundation you have specified?

Answer:  I do.

19.  Do you authorize civil suits against Txx Lxxxx, Bxxxxxx Pxxx and others for schemes relating to your impersonation following your intended murder by the FBI?

Answer:  I do.

And if any or all civil suits are lost, I reserve the right to sue independently at a future time, with all information available to me.

No legal complaint can be complete without the active participation of the complainant.

20.  How can these egregious abuses of power against your family and yourself be prevented in the future?

Answer:  By ensuring that there is a high personal cost to individuals who prey upon us for the purpose of profiteering and entertainment, and that cost should be manifested through civil judgments and public exposure.

21.  What should happen to the false documentation with which the FBI has defamed you to such perilous degree?

Answer:  Number one, I should have the right to evaluate it in its entirety.  It's only in this way that I can best defend the nation against ongoing harm through AI-generated material in the future.

Secondly, the perpetrators who created, aggregated and disseminated false material in this case must acknowledge that they did so with astonishing malice aforethought, and their confessions in this regard should be made a central part of the documentation of my case, to be made available to the American public in perpetuity.

22.  Will you be attending dog training at PetCo this afternoon?

Answer:  That's not going to happen, no.  Gun violence is a tragic phenomenon in the United States, one which the FBI is all too comfortable in precipitating.  And I will simply say that our friends and neighbors are not targets in a video game conducted by corrupt law enforcement.  Neither am I.

23.  Will you please keep in close communication with us, given the unprecedented threats to your safety?

Answer:  Yes, of course.

24.  Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.

Answer:  You are most welcome.

Lane MacWilliams

No comments:

Post a Comment