1. You have been informed that far right factions of the FBI are attempting to frame your husband in wrongdoing of which he has no knowledge. Is that true?
Answer: Yes. I am informed that the FBI is utilizing misappropriated DNA as "evidence," in addition to some type of "fingerprinting" technology with which I am not familiar.
2. Is it actually possible to simulate fingerprints?
Answer: I have no idea. It may be that FBI informants are simply trying to obtain a "target's" fingerprints on something as simple as a pen that can subsequently be placed elsewhere.
3. What are the specific threats you have received pertaining to your husband?
Answer: Threats of faked communications, threats of attempts to "reverse engineer" his accomplishments at work, threats of the possession of "state secrets" of some sort, threats of a "nuclear scam" of some kind.
4. You have also been told that the far right may have engaged in some efforts to implicate your younger son in a similar manner.
Answer: Yes, I have received a number of "like-father-like-son" threats, appearing to imply that both my husband and my son could be falsely accused of similar crimes, the specifics of which we do not know.
5. Alongside these threats, you have received myriad threats lately of water-borne illness, or a "plague in the water."
Answer: I have, and I don't know what illness these threats are referring to in particular. But they seem to threaten hospitalization and/or death to one or more of my family members as the result of some type of water-borne disease.
6. Your younger son's parked car was impacted by a bus a few days ago.
Answer: Yes, it was.
7. Did your stalker appear to take credit for this accident?
Answer: He did, yes.
8. Afterwards, your younger son spoke to your husband over the phone about this incident, and then was allegedly forced to file a report with his FBI handler about that conversation.
Answer: That is my understanding.
9. But you have been told that your younger son's FBI handler is also falsifying witness statements internally to the FBI, after they have been signed.
Answer: That is what I have been told, yes. It seems that handlers often persuade witnesses to sign statements that they may have seen or heard something suspicious, but they can't be certain. Afterwards, it appears that the handlers remove the equivocal language without informants' consent.
10. In this way, FBI handlers obtain a falsified witness statement with the informant's signature appended. And this process appears to be routine for certain segments of the agency.
Answer: Yes, it does.
11. Your stalker appears to have claimed recently that the minister of your church, Matthew McDermott, signed a knowingly falsified witness statement for the FBI. He also seems to have claimed that Kimberly Kelly, your children's former nanny, has recently been coerced into signing knowingly falsified witness statements about your family.
Answer: I have received those claims, but I have no direct knowledge of those events. I will simply say that it appears that far right FBI personnel are adept at frightening people into signing almost anything.
12. But a minister?
Answer: Anyone can be a victim of these tactics. During World War II, control of churches and ministers was assigned to Adolf Eichmann. Each congregation ultimately had an SS officer assigned to it. But it was a process that was gradual. A church's National Socialist "representative" in 1939 became a church's National Socialist "liaison" by 1941. By 1943, the National Socialists were approving or disapproving ministers' sermons directly. All words spoken from the pulpit had to be submitted to the SS in advance.
13. It seems that the FBI is attempting to coerce false statements from your minister in wielding the public assumption that a minister will not lie.
Answer: I cannot comment on the FBI's methods in this case. The agency may be falsifying material internally after it is signed by informants. I can encourage informants to review previously submitted reports and correct them. And I believe that encouragement to be important.
14. Why?
Answer: Because most people do not want to lie about others, and most people would be horrified to know that coerced lies are being used to cause harm to innocents.
15. Why do far right segments of the FBI seem to be so intent on implicating you and your family of wrongdoing?
Answer: The agency as a whole has never been encouraged to accept responsibility for the wrongs it has committed. There is a culture of impunity and aggression within its ranks. FBI personnel are instructed to follow orders through a military-style chain of command, and not to evaluate whether those orders violate the Constitution or the rule of law.
16. It seems that the far right within the FBI seeks not only to silence whistleblowers through intimidation, but to silence them through violence.
Answer: It does seem that way. The agency appears to be utilizing the "target of interest" list, the "Phoenix Program," the "disposition matrix," and the military's "signature reduction program" to extend acts of violence and harm toward whistleblowers and their families.
17. You have sometimes said that a dystopia is defined by a society that locks up the truth tellers while the criminals go free.
Answer: I have, yes.
18. How long has it been since you have had the freedom to leave your home in safety?
Answer: Many, many months. Too many to count.
19. How do you feel about that?
Answer: I feel deeply concerned for the future of our democracy.
20. Yet, you have not chosen to be rendered silent.
Answer: No. Silence is acquiescence to totalitarianism. And I will not relinquish my hopes for our country by acquiescing to those who wish to usurp power through unconstitutional means from the American electorate. Democracy requires that we speak out loud.
19. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?
Answer: I do.
Lane MacWilliams
