1. You have been asked to comment this morning regarding your efforts to bring attention to FBI atrocities committed in Moscow, Idaho in 2022. It is suggested that the FBI has requested permission from the Executive Branch to confiscate your records, and further, to perpetrate violence in that process. It is also suggested that the agency seeks to cause harm to your other family members and MG in its desire to evade accountability for the atrocities referenced here.
Answer: Well, I think it is clear that the FBI will do all it can to avoid being held to account for this crime. However, I have already provided to the public defender sufficient information for her to win her case. So, I don't think it will be a simple matter for the FBI of eliminating a witness. The agency is caught, as are its affiliates, and now people really need to pick sides. Do they support the sadistic and gratuitous murder of our loved ones or do they not? Most politicians are going to be responding with an emphatic no.
2. Are the perpetrators of this crime protected through immunity agreements with the FBI and DoD?
Answer: More than individual culpability, there is institutional culpability. Perpetrators can certainly assert that they were "just doing their jobs" within the chain of command. But the existence of these programs serves as quite an indictment.
3. Because these were not "rogue actors."
Answer: No, they weren't. They were operating within a programmatic framework that has been well-established.
4. Was the Phoenix Program initiated by Nixon?
Answer: It was approved by Nixon. And this is probably the worst aspect of his legacy. Watergate was nothing in its assault on our democracy compared to Phoenix.
5. Won't Phoenix just be renamed and moved to other auspices after this, as the three-letter agencies always do when they wish to have their way?
Answer: It will, yes. But we're talking about one case in Moscow, Idaho that everyone in the world can immediately see as an appalling and grievous abuse of power.
And my point is that the falsified law enforcement reporting that enabled these heinous crimes needs to be investigated, evaluated, and judged through due process.
Because those lies, wielded systematically by law enforcement, will lead us straight to a failed nation.
So, the public needs to awaken, and it needs to awaken now.
6. What kind f nation do we want to have ten years from now?
Answer: This is exactly the question we should be asking. Do we want to create a totalitarian states, ruled by fear and falsehood, enforced by torture, institutional violence and mayhem?
Or can the United States maintain a right to individual sovereignty in insisting on the preservation of Constitutional law?
7. You have made the point previously that our national sovereignty and our individual sovereignty are related.
Answer: They are bound together, yes. Without our individual sovereignty, our nation cannot retain its free and independent identity either.
8. Yet, you think the defense of our Constitutional liberty is possible.
Answer: In standing up for the Freedom of Information Act, yes.
In standing up for direct DOJ and ODNI communication with whistleblowers, yes.
In standing up for the truth of events in Moscow, Idaho, yes.
But we need to work together, and with the highest possible ethics to guide us.
9. Would you like to reconfirm your lawful and honorable conduct at this time?
Answer: Certainly. This is to reconfirm that all of my activities, communications, conduct, intentions, purchases, subscriptions, and viewing of videos/films on any platform have been and continue to be lawful and honorable in every way, shape, and form. I hereby contest the claims of any person who suggests otherwise as knowingly, willfully, and categorically false.
10. Do you hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct?
Answer: I do.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment