An Urgent Matter: Insisting on the Territorial Integrity of the United States

 1.  What is your perspective regarding the planned Qatar air force base in Idaho?

Answer:  This is an issue that pertains directly to national sovereignty concerns for the United States.  Qatar has served in some international negotiations as a proxy for Russia.  So the plans to build a Qatari air force base open the door to Russian use of an extensive military facility within the territorial borders of the United States.

2.  Could we potentially see the Qatari air force base serving as a kind of Trojan horse in the future, from which Russian forces could extend a tangible hold on the territorial claim to the United States?

Answer:  We could, yes.  And beyond the Russians, we need to consider Putin's close cooperation with the Chinese and other foreign adversaries of democratic societies, Constitutional republics, and the West in general.

There is a push by some for "one world government," so the Qatari air force base is not the last foreign military installation that is planned within the borders of the United States.  It is simply the first.

3.  Can it be halted?

Answer:  The Supreme Court may have the ability to disallow this development, though Congressional intervention is likely more immediate.

4.  It has been stated that the air force base will simply be used for joint military training.

Answer:  That's just not the case.  There are plans for an extensive underground installations at that location, and involving the surrounding mountainous terrain as well.  And truthfully, these underground installations are the primary security concern for Americans.  This is a relatively remote location, and the average American is simply going to have no idea of what is happening.

But, as I said, this is a sovereignty violation regarding the territorial integrity of the United States.  And because of the long term plans for this facility, it should be halted.

The United States military leadership needs to be able to uphold its vows to the Constitution in defending our country as a whole.

And this planned installation would force them to violate every one of those promises to the nation.

The Joint Chiefs see this quite clearly.

5.  Who is requiring the establishment of "one world government" at this time?

Answer:  You are asking the correct question.

6.  That necessity is not being mandated by the United States, or even Russia or China?

Answer:  It is not.  No.

7.  So someone else is dictating these comprehensive changes worldwide?

Answer:  Yes.

8.  Your stance is that the United States' military leadership needs to maintain control over the territorial integrity of the United States, and should, in fact, assume a leadership position regarding issues of paramount global concern.

Answer:  Yes, that's true.  Only with the United States in this leadership role can we hope to protect human sovereignty in its most meaningful manifestations in the future.  So we need to insist that the United States not cede its leadership role, even in the midst of great change and upheaval.

9.  Is it possible for the United States to insist in this regard?

Answer:  We have a much greater balance of power than other superpower nations.  The American public remains a profoundly formidable force with a fierce commitment to independence and self-determination.  So, yes, we do have the ability to insist, whereas the publics of other nations have been subordinated and repressed to totalitarian regimes in a manner that leaves them comparatively voiceless.

10.  Do the American people have a role to play in contacting Congress regarding this fundamental sovereignty concern?

Answer:  Again, the true plans for this facility are not being written about in the general press.  But our executive leadership has seen them, our military leadership has seen them, and a few members of Congress have seen them.

With those pieces in place, we need to find a way to express that the underground construction planned at this air force base will not be accepted by the American public, nor by Congress, nor by the Supreme Court, nor by our executive leadership behind closed doors.

Our elected leaders may disagree on many aspects of the governance of the nation, but they do all agree on fundamental sovereignty questions such as this one.

So, we need to assist them in protecting our territorial integrity in this instance, and in all other attempts by others to violate it -- because they will arise.

11.  Thank you for speaking with us about this critical issue this afternoon.

Answer:  You are quite welcome.

Lane MacWilliams