1. What are the initial points of a "truce" that has been ostensibly extended to you by the FBI?
Answer: A potential truce would include the following:
- immediate honorable discharge of my sons and MX from all further involvement in government programs. All communications devices would be removed and they would be free to focus on their recovery. Settlements would need to be approved by me given the nature of the harms they have all sustained due to aggression by the FBI. Their sovereignty would be restored in its entirety, as would the sovereignty of all of my family members, friends, loved ones and myself. Any "convictions" of my family members would be vacated and my family members would be granted immunity and freedom from ongoing investigation and surveillance. All agency or organized crime requirements of my loved ones would cease in perpetuity. My sons and MX would receive no further "assignments" and would experience no further harm of any kind. My husband would experience no further harm of any kind.
- my hotel and community would be rendered entirely safe and my stay there would be facilitated for as long as I desire, and this is to include environmental concerns, freedom from Dxx deployment, rxxxxxxxx exposure, cxxxxxxx exposure, pxxxxxxx exposure, etc.
- our health would be entirely restored without further harm, including the health of my pets
- Tom Lyons and the FBI would cease all attempts to implicate my family members, living or dead, of crimes perpetrated at FBI direction as part of the unconstitutional Pxxxxxx Program and would further cease any tangible harms based on programs of knowingly falsified law enforcement reporting
- educational pursuits, amended claim, settlement to my family members with my direct involvement
- larger settlements extended to me in the interests of national and individual sovereignty for the United States and United States citizens, to include concerns relating to territorial integrity, environmental preservation, the sustenance of American culture, history, religion, journalism, agriculture, intellectual property, technological innovation, the support of long term economic stability and other national priorities.
- United States' leadership regarding ongoing global concerns
- sovereignty of the United States military leadership to act in the national interest in accordance with the Constitution
- discussion of all other concerns
2. Together with the above, you have asked that the United States pause the construction of any underground or in-mountain facilities for others, both in Idaho and in other locations.
Answer: Yes, I have. There are many environmental concerns relating to these facilities, including geologic stability studies, environmental impact studies, watershed studies, and communication with the public that our military will wish to insist upon -- and that President Trump, the Supreme Court, the lower courts, the Department of Justice and the United States Congress will no doubt wish to prioritize as well.
Other nations should be guided to engage in parallel due diligence regarding these proposed installations.
And that simply takes time.
3. Do you have other concerns that you would articulate?
Answer: I would caution every individual and interest group involved in this situation against any attempt to despoil the environment, the oceans, the atmosphere, or our predominant ecosystems based on photosynthesis, etc. We shouldn't be seeing any unprecedented meteor falls or any escalation to non-conventional weapons at any location in the world. Nor should we be suffering from stepped-up terrorist activity or EMPs or functional "nuclear winter."
I want to see a preservation of the environment alongside the best of humanity's artistic, cultural, historic, scientific, literary and technical achievements, and I want to know that appropriate steps are being taken to ensure this critical protection.
4. Will you speak to other concerns in the coming days?
Answer: I will.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment