1. What are the threats you are receiving from the FBI and its affiliate agencies currently, given your recent exposure of Tom Lyons' treasonous conduct toward the United States?
Answer: Trafficking threats toward my sons and MX, false reports of terrorism and other extremely serious crimes against all of my family members and myself, kidnapping threats against all of us, kidnapping threats toward my pets, staged explosion, fire, and/or power outage at my hotel, Dxx deployment in my hotel, fatal pxxxxxxx deployment in my hotel and elsewhere, car bomb, package bomb, sexual assault, forced job loss, staged car accident, dog bite incident plus lawsuit, staged plane accident, sniper assault, accident caused by a motorcycle-, e-bike, bicycle or scooter, drug overdose, fall from a height, Pxxxxxx Program assignments, "cleaning" assignments, untreated physical illnesses caused by Mr. Lyons' directives, sovereignty violations against all of us, false messaging, false AI-generated film and photos, violent law enforcement raid, on and on.
2. Are all of these threats the result of the fact that Mr. Lyons is virtually "untouchable," according to his own account, within the ranks of the FBI?
Answer: Mr. Lyons may well be untouchable by the DOJ. I cannot answer to that issue.
If he previously assured the DOJ that he was reversing certain critical health harms toward me, he obviously lied to the OIG Hotline and the Attorney General regarding that concern. My life is now grievously imperiled as a direct result of those lies.
And I would be shocked if my family members' lives have not been unconscionably placed at risk in the same way.
I think the question we all need to consider is whether a man who views himself as above the law, wielding great power, is capable of betraying not only the most honorable citizens of our nation, but also our nation itself.
And, obviously, the answer is yes.
3. Did Tom Lyons directly facilitate the transfer of the nuclear codes of the United States and Western Europe to Vladimir Putin?
Answer: The FBI itself alleges that he did, yes.
4. And did he do so for pay?
Answer: It hardly matters, given the seriousness of his crime. But yes, I'm sure he was compensated.
5. What was the direct result of his crime?
Answer: The direct result was that Vladimir Putin was proceeding down a path of using non-conventional weapons against Ukraine and Western Europe in a continuing plan of territorial aggression against the West.
6. In other words, mutual deterrence had been removed from the equation with Tom Lyons' transfer of those codes.
Answer: Yes. Completely removed. Vladimir Putin could have deployed nuclear weapons at any time and we could not have responded in kind. Nor could European nations. So Russia had total control, with no consequences. And I cannot think of a more dangerous proposition in the realm of geopolitics.
7. And we were seeing the set-up for Russia's nuclear deployment in the plan to initiate drone forays from Ukraine deep into Russian territory. Is that the case?
Answer: Yes, it is. This was meant to be later described as an escalation of territorial aggression that provoked the use of nuclear arms. But in fact, Russia is participating in this plan of stepped-up aggression in every aspect.
8. What was the real intent behind Russia's unconscionable plan to deploy one or more nuclear weapons?
Answer: The real intent, as I have said, was for Russia to advance through Western Europe. With no real military deterrent, and with a world that would have been in shock over the tragedy and scope of the destruction, Russia would have met with little resistance.
9. So how serious was Tom Lyons' crime in this context?
Answer: As serious as it gets.
10. You are describing an FBI that has been thoroughly compromised by Russian interests.
Answer: I am, yes. The CIA has the same problem. Fundamentally, there is a push by others for "one world government," and Russia's infiltration of our three-letter agencies has been justified by this objective.
And we have run into these conflicts before, as when Russia placed bounties on the heads of U.S. servicemen and -women in Afghanistan -- and this information was well-known within our national security apparatus.
11. What kind of view does the U.S. military take of this compromise?
Answer: Our military leaders do not want to be damaging the territorial integrity of the United States, nor of the Northern Hemisphere. They do not want to be despoiling the landscape gratuitously, and they do not want to be causing excessive and egregious damage that will undermine our nation and human sovereignty worldwide in perpetuity.
So, I would say with confidence that they stand opposed to Russia's agenda in this matter, and I'm sure they stand opposed to China's objectives as well.
Both Russia and China long ago abandoned any pretense that the defense of human rights over the long term was a worthy or defining priority.
It's going to be up to the United States over the long term to insist on environmental preservation, national security interests, and human sovereignty, one alongside the other.
And my point is that that long term planning must begin now, not at some undetermined future point.
If Russia were allowed to deploy nuclear weapons as the result of Tom Lyons' treason, the whole planet would be irretrievably diminished.
So, it's up to us to make sure that doesn't happen.
12. You have illuminated some of Tom Lyons' most heinous and indefensible crimes against the nation and against your family. Is Mr. Lyons still directly controlling your sons and daughter-in-law at this juncture?
Answer: Yes, he is.
13. So, if he ordered your sons or MX to break the law in some way...?
Answer: Given the sovereignty violations Mr. Lyons perpetrated against them, they would feel compelled to comply.
14. So Mr. Lyons could easily wrongfully implicate your sons and/or daughter-in-law only to follow up by causing their grievous injury or death in some manner. Is that true?
Answer: Without question. Beyond this, I am receiving extensive threats pertaining to forced job loss for a family member -- also directed by Tom Lyons. So, the retaliatory capacity of this man is not to be underestimated, unfortunately.
My point is simply that Mr. Lyons' crimes of treason have led to the vulnerability of the Northern Hemisphere to catastrophic Russian aggression. And I think we can all agree that that possibility must be decisively prevented.
If the DOJ cannot hold Mr. Lyons to account, the American and European and worldwide members of the public can.
And beyond this, we need to ask if we want Mr. Lyons to have the freedom in the long term to wield the kind of appalling harms toward others which he has wielded against my family members and myself.
Should the FBI be able to murder anyone who voices concerns about the manner in which the agency is conducting itself? Should the FBI be able to murder the family members of anyone who voices concerns? Because this is where we're currently heading.
15. You complained to the OIG Hotline repeatedly over the last few years that the titles of Spotify songs or the subject headings of emails sent to you were sometimes being replaced by long letter/number sequences that had no meaning to you. Was that an attempt by Tom Lyons to project blame for his own treason onto others?
Answer: I honestly have no idea. I thought the incidents were concerning enough to report to the OIG Hotline, however. In general, malignant narcissists like Tom Lyons project the guilt for their crimes onto virtuous others. So, we can best understand their accusations as a kind of ongoing confession of their own misconduct. Malignant narcissism is a serious mental illness, and we want to be certain that those who suffer from it are being adequately treated.
They probably cannot have access to the nuclear codes of the United States or our allies under any circumstances, it bears repeating, because they will find a way to sell, disseminate or otherwise cause maximum harm to others through the misuse of that information.
These people draw a sense of their own power through causing harm to others -- many others. So wise governance would always withhold the most sensitive military information from all individuals who suffer from this type of psychopathology.
16. How would such individuals justify the sale of the nuclear codes of the United States and our allies to a foreign adversary like Russia?
Answer: You know, I'm not interested in exploring the lies that Mr. Lyons has told to himself about his worst crimes against the nation and the world as a whole. Is there some internal narrative that stands separate from reality? Absolutely. But we are only interested in Mr. Lyons' conduct, not the confabulating that accompanies it within his own disordered mind.
17. Does Mr. Lyons take neuroleptic medication?
Answer: The FBI says that he does, yes, but to what extent these accusations apply to him and to what extent they apply to close associates of the FBI, I don't know. Does he have auditory hallucinations that require the medication? What is his diagnosis? How severe is his mental illness? I don't have this information, but I think the DOJ should acquire it.
18. Did Tom Lyons have your older son hospitalized in a psychiatric unit at Stanford when he was really suffering from a pituitary tumor?
Answer: Yes, he did.
19. Did he direct that your older son be misdiagnosed with schizophrenia and fail to treat his pituitary tumor all the while?
Answer: Yes, he did.
20. Did he direct that your older son be placed on so much medication that he would experience what Mr. Lyons termed a "pharmaceutical lobotomy"?
Answer: Yes, he did.
21. Did your older son develop tardive dyskinesia as a direct result of Tom Lyons' crimes against him in this one area alone?
Answer: Yes, he did.
22. Do you feel that Mr. Lyons has exercised a sadistic predatory focus on your loved ones and you yourself over time?
Answer: He has, and so have his close associates.
I think the issue for the United States and, indeed, the planet as a whole, is that there is no real limit to the public harm Mr. Lyons would like to perpetrate.
One of Mr. Lyons' close associates said that Mr. Lyons was "laughing" when he lied to the DOJ about remediating certain health harms toward me, and "laughing" further over the following years as my heart, lungs, kidneys, liver and brain became more and more damaged.
So, this is a person who draws pleasure from causing gratuitous harm, whether to one person or one billion, to one backyard or the Northern Hemisphere, to a single puddle or the Atlantic Ocean.
And we all need to worry about the kind of world Tom Lyons has in mind for us and for our children.
What good is a man who is kind to his own children, but tortures yours?
This is a deeply unworthy individual, and we need to ensure that power is wrested from his grip as soon as possible.
23. Have you helped to ensure that Russia will not be able to utilize nuclear weapons against Ukraine and Western Europe due to Tom Lyons' treason against the United States?
Answer: One can only hope. Mutual deterrence is a worthy paradigm, and it's one that must be preserved and upheld at all times. I'm sure our military leadership would heartily agree.
24. Do you have a hope of physical recovery, given the astonishing harms Tom Lyons has perpetrated against you and against your family members?
Answer: Would I like for us to have the opportunity to make a full recovery from Mr. Lyons' crimes against us? Of course, yes. And I hope the recovery of my loved ones and myself can be prioritized.
25. You would like to continue to advocate for the United States to assume a position of global leadership with regard to the environmental crisis and other critical challenges we will face in the future. Is that the case?
Answer: Emphatically so. Our national sovereignty and the future sovereignty of mankind are now dependent on the ability of the United States to rise to that role of primary leadership, entirely separate and apart from the ambitions of Russia and/or China. And my point has been that my case, correctly handled through outreach to me, can be harnessed to ensure that the United States succeeds in this necessity.
26. Thank you for speaking with us this afternoon.
Answer: You are quite welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment