Lane von Herzen: Failure to Fulfill Privacy Act Requirements by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

My Third Novel's Conclusion, My Heartbreak

My heart begins to break when I think about completing this particular book -- because this narrative has sustained me like no other story I've known. It's both more personal and more universal than my other works. But beyond memory and archetype, it's a cri-de-coeur about needing to become the person one is destined to be. And in the writing, I have met my own life's work, my own fated journey -- having the sense all the while that the pages are suffused with a resonance, an energy, an electrified field that defies explanation. Writers hope and pray to be overtaken by a work in this way -- to be conscripted into passionate service of a profound story. To experience it even once in a lifetime seems a great privilege. I still have several months before this novel is complete, and this constitutes my reprieve. Because I'm not ready for the beauty to end.

Monday, October 6, 2025

Failure to Fulfill Privacy Act Requirements by the Canadian Human Rights Commission

The failure of a government office to uphold its commitments to the public in this case should be accompanied by immediate high-level outreach to ensure that resolution of all concerns is being fully addressed. Yet, I have received no such outreach regarding this matter as of this time, 3:31 PM on Monday, October 6, 2025.

This would appear to be yet one more gambit to profiteer from the ongoing torture of my family members and myself, with no real attempt to reclaim our health or human rights, even through confidential dialogue, which I have repeatedly recommended.

The FBI's ongoing threats of brain damage through sonic weapons, in addition to recent threats from the agency of causing deafness, heart attack, stroke, dementia, cancer, HIV, TB, syphilis, hepatitis, schistosomiasis, thyroid disease and more, are highly notable.

But partial withdrawal of the extensive health harms caused to my family members and myself by the FBI over the course of this case is simply not enough of a response to satisfy the moral imperative of this circumstance.

The DOJ needs to insist on honorable outreach to me at this time, in defense of judicial standards for which it is accountable.

I look forward to receiving that outreach, and beginning a confidential dialogue regarding the most pressing sovereignty concerns of the United States government at this time.

Lane MacWilliams

To the Canadian Human Rights Commission:

Thank you for your email.

May I ask why the CHRC is unable to accommodate the provision of records responsive to my Privacy Request through in-person examination within a government office, as is the policy of the Privacy Act?

This access was to have been made available to me by September 29, 2025, as you know. Yet, it was never extended.

The CHRC appears to be stating, in contrast to previous email correspondence, that it is unable to uphold the requirements of the Privacy Act at this time.

This assertion appears to be highly unusual, as it contradicts the CHRC's explicit and implicit commitments to the public.

Does the CHRC believe, through information that has been provided to its auspices by the FBI or its affiliates, that my safety would be placed at risk through in-person viewing of the documentation in a government office?

Or is there no government office which desires to be held accountable for the provision of incomplete or falsified records?

Or both?

Please inform me of the specific reasons why the requirements of the Privacy Act cannot be upheld by the Canadian Human Rights Commission in this case.

I appreciate your assistance in this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Lane MacWilliams