1. You have previously stated that every single American has a dossier of false reporting from the FBI. Does that include children?
Answer: It does, yes. And we really need to pause here for a moment to understand the seriousness of the mistake when a society decides to commence institutional lying about children from birth.
2. What form might those lies take?
Answer: Any form at all, because the information is increasingly AI-generated. The point is that it doesn't have to be true. Does your child ask the wrong question in front of an Amazon Echo? They could be classified as psychologically aberrant, and that information is aggregated. Does your teenager swear in front of friends? They could be viewed as having an anger disorder. That information is logged. Does your child pick the wrong topic or the wrong perspective if he or she is studying the Civil Rights Movement in American history class? That writing may be interpreted as subversive, and that information is made part of the permanent record. But in addition, if your child uses social media, he or she is being documented as taking part in chat groups he or she has never heard of, as engaging in dialogue (actually AI-generated) that could be viewed as dangerous to the public interest, as extending threats toward others (also AI-generated) that your child never expressed, etc.
3. Yet, aren't our children innocent?
Answer: Yes, our children are innocent. This is what we need to now assert and this is what we need to be expressing to our children on an ongoing basis.
All children will ask questions. All children will be curious about the world. All children will have developmental anomalies that don't fit a standard time table.
Einstein had a serious depression at the age of fifteen or sixteen. How tolerant would we be of that setback at this point in our history?
4. What happens when our children are confronted with the dossiers of false reporting the FBI has aggregated about them?
Answer: If the FBI reveals documentation that could result in charges or arrest, then the agency is seeking coercion, false witness statements implicating family members or friends, human trafficking compromise, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, and more.
5. Haven't your own young adult sons been given Executive Orders to sign knowingly false witness statements?
Answer: The FBI appears to allege that they have, yes.
6. And what do those knowingly false witness statements allege?
Answer: The FBI appears to suggest that they contain the usual misogynist tropes of promiscuity and/or mental illness.
7. The FBI and its affiliates, including the Executive Branch, are forcing your sons to sign this documentation containing defamatory statements about you?
Answer: This is the allegation, yes.
8. For the purpose of theft on the part of this administration?
Answer; I cannot comment on the amount of funds that may have been misappropriated on this basis. But avarice seems to be a powerful motivator in this case, certainly.
9. Has the FBI suggested that you should accept the defamation in this instance?
Answer: The FBI has always suggested that I should accept the agency's defamation, including this instance.
10. What is your willingness to be called unstable by an agency that is attempting to steal from accounts bearing your name?
Answer: Zero. The FBI's defamation is a prelude to murder in each and every case. In my situation, one in which I am advocating for the sovereignty of many Americans, no defamation can be viewed as acceptable or tolerable.
11. The FBI is currently urging you to "resign." What does that mean? Have you had any direct communication from anyone affiliated with the government?
Answer: None. I did receive a mostly redacted report from the FBI at the insistence of the ODNI several years ago, which demonstrated that the FBI was wrongfully referring complainants to Adult Protective Services in order to justify their ongoing surveillance.
But other than this, I have received no substantive provision of documentation.
12. Is that about to change with your FOIA request to the State of Illinois?
Answer: I don't know. I was supposed to receive notification from the Public Access Counselor yesterday about their decision to force the Secretary of State Police to provide me with documentation.
13. Did you receive any email regarding this decision?
Answer: I did not have it in my gmail inbox, no. Having said that, the FBI often erases critical emails from my inbox. So, it's entirely possible that it was sent to me.
Given that the FBI appears now to suggest that I will be shot if I don't "resign," it seems likely that there is a missing email communication.
14. What is your perspective on your circumstances as they now stand?
Answer: I would certainly like to learn what the Public Access Counselor has to say.
15. And what about the false accusations your sons are allegedly being ordered to sign?
Answer: It is indefensible for any part of the United States government to be directing family members to lie about family members.
That's North Korean gulag territory.
That does not reflect worthy American conduct.
16. Will your sons correct the record soon enough?
Answer: They will, without doubt. But the funds associated with this case need to be protected from misappropriation in the interim.
17. Will you please remain in close communication with us today, given these unprecedented circumstances?
Answer: Yes, of course.
18. Thank you for speaking with us this morning.
Answer: You are most welcome.
Lane MacWilliams
No comments:
Post a Comment